1997 02 13 CC MinutesN
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR SESSION
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN
February 13, 1997
The City Council of the City of Baytown, Texas, met in regular session on
February 13, 1997, at 6:30 p.m., in the John Tucker Lecture Hall at Lee College,
with the following in attendance:
Eva Benavides
David Byford
Manuel Escontrias
E. Frank Hinds, Jr.
Stephen DonCarlos
Rolland J. Pruett
Pete C. Alfaro
Bobby Rountree
Ignacio Ramirez
Eileen P. Hall
Council Member
Council Member
Council Member
Council Member
Council Member
Council Member
Mayor
City Manager
City Attorney
City Clerk
The meeting was opened with a quorum present, and Council Member
Escontrias offered the invocation, after which the following business was
conducted:
Consider Approval of Minutes for the Regular Session held on January 23,
1997
Council Member DonCarlos moved to approve the minutes for the
meeting held on January 23, 1997, with the correction that Council Member
Benavides was absent. Council Member Pruett seconded the motion. The vote
follows:
Ayes: Council Members Benavides, Byford, Escontrias,
Hinds, DonCarlos, and Pruett
Mayor Alfaro
Nays: None
970213 -2
Minutes for Regular Session - February 13, 1997
Consider Proposed Ordinance No. 970213 -2, Amending Agreement for
Engineering Services Between the City of Baytown and Langford
Engineering, Inc., for the Garth Road Manhole Repair Project
This ordinance amends an agreement that originally included the repair of
one manhole to design a repair for approximately 1,500 feet of 21 -inch concrete
sewer pipe and manholes from Garth Road to the lift station near Spur 201. On
February 3 the 21 -inch pipe downstream of the Garth Road manhole collapsed.
Rather than perform a point repair, the City recommended pipe- bursting
approximately 1600 feet of sewer pipe at an estimated construction cost of
$250,000. The estimated engineering cost is $20,680. Council Member
Escontrias moved to adopt the ordinance. Council Member DonCarlos
seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Council Members Benavides, Byford, Escontrias,
Hinds, DonCarlos, and Pruett
Mayor Alfaro
Nays: None
ORDINANCE NO. 7892
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE AGREEMENT FOR
ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF BAYTOWN
AND LANGFORD ENGINEERING, INC., FOR REROUTING A
TWENTY -ONE INCH SEWER LINE ON GARTH ROAD IN THE
AMOUNT OF TWENTY THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED EIGHTY
AND NO1100 DOLLARS ($20,680.00); AND PROVIDING FOR
THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF.
Consider Proposed Ordinance No. 970213 -3, Authorizing Agreement with
Planergy, Inc., for implementing an Electric Curtailment Program Between
June 1 and September 30 Each Year
The HL &P Planergy Curtailment program gives the City and the Baytown
Area Water Authority the opportunity to participate in a program designed to
provide rebates to commercial and industrial customers who agree to curtail
(shed) loads for brief periods during HL &P peak demands. A study has been
conducted at BAWA and at the East District Wastewater Treatment Plant to
determine the amount of load each plant can curtail for a three -hour period and
provide acceptable service during the curtailment period.
970213 -3
Minutes of Regular Meeting - February 13, 1997
The number of requests by HL &P to curtail load is limited to fifteen three -
hour occurrences during the four -month summer period from June 1 to
September 30. The notification time is one hour prior to the start of the load
reduction with a maximum request of three hours per pay only on weekday
afternoons between the hours of 12:00 noon and 8:00 p.m. Curtailment will not
occur on weekends or holidays. The baseline kilowatt usage that the reduction
will be calculated from will be the kilowatt usage of the plant one hour prior to the
call to reduce load. The contract with HL &P will be satisfied if the demand
curtailment is at least 75% of the contracted amount. Monitoring equipment will
be provided to each plant as part of the contract. This equipment will enable
each plant to monitor the load curtailment and can be used to monitor the load
24 hours a day even when not under any curtailment period. The rebate is paid
by check or credited to the electric bill for the period of June 1 to September 30
whether HL &P requires a curtailment of power demand or not. The City will be
paid $4,680 and BAWA $10,920 annually.
Council Member Escontrias moved to adopt the ordinance. Council
Member Benavides seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Council Members Benavides, Byford, Escontrias,
Hinds, DonCarlos, and Pruett
Mayor Alfaro
Nays: None
ORDINANCE NO. 7893
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY
MANAGER TO EXECUTE AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST
TO AN AGREEMENT WITH PLANERGY, INC., FOR
IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRIC CURTAILMENT PROGRAM;
AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF.
Hold Public Hearing On The Proposed Amendment To The Official Zoning
Map Of The City Of Baytown, Reclassifying Property Located At 1201
Lindberg From Neighborhood Conservation District To A Mixed Use
District At 6:40 P.M.
Mayor Alfaro called to order the public hearing concerning the proposed
amendment to the official zoning map of the City of Baytown reclassifying the
property located at 1201 Lindberg from Neighborhood Conservation District to a
Mixed Use District. He asked that everyone desiring to speak at the hearing sign
970213 -4
Minutes of Regular Meeting - February 13, 1997
the list in the foyer if they had not already done so as that list would provide the
speaking order for the hearing. He stated that the hearing was for the purpose
of receiving input with regard to the proposed property reclassification and that
everyone desiring to present information would be given ample opportunity to do
so. He encouraged each speaker to be as brief and to the point as possible. He
stressed that this was not an adversarial -type proceeding and that the purpose
was to give all interested persons an opportunity to be heard on the proposal.
He said that if anyone had any questions, they should be directed to him and
with the aid of City staff, he would attempt to have the questions answered.
The City Manager said that 1201 Lindberg is the address of an old
convenience store located south of Robert E. Lee High School at the intersection
of Carnegie and Lindberg. It is located south of the school district's old bus barn.
A vacant lot is to the northeast, residential structures are to the south, and the
Carnegie Street right -of -way followed by a residential structure to the west. The
property currently abuts the boundary line of a Mixed Use District but is located
in a Neighborhood Conservation District. It has been closed for over twelve
months; therefore, it is not a permitted NC use. Rezoning the property to a MU
district would permit the applicant to reopen the convenience store at this
location. Letters have been mailed to all residents within 300 feet of the property
and a sign was posted on the property of the possible reclassification.
In response to inquiry from Council, Mr. Ricardo Valdez, the applicant,
stated that he had lived in Baytown two years, that he did not plan to sell alcohol
at that location, and that he did believe there were enough people in the area to
support the business.
There being no others desiring to speak, Mayor Alfaro closed this public
hearing.
Consider Proposed Ordinance No. 970213 -1, Amending the Official Zoning
Map of the City of Baytown for Property Located at 1201 Lindberg from
Neighborhood Conservation to Mixed Use
The City Manager explained that the Baytown Zoning Commission held
one public hearing regarding this matter and had prepared a report along with a
recommendation of approval. The Commission made their decision based on
the staff analysis and comments from the applicant. Their decision to
recommend reclassification may be reasonable due to the proximity of the Mixed
Use District. Issues along district lines are difficult ones. This commercial
building is not in the center of a Neighborhood Conservation District; therefore,
there may be a tendency to allow its use. There are, however, residential
970213 -5
Minutes of Regular Meeting - February 13, 1997
structures on two sides. It has been closed for over twelve months and is not
eligible for "grandfathering."
Section 35- 17(b)(4)(g) of the Code of Ordinances provides six criteria for
City council to consider when determining a proposed amendment. Listed below
are the criteria, the administration's response, and the response of the
commission, respectively.
1. Consistent with the Zoning Ordinance. Whether and the extent to
which the proposed amendment would conflict with any portion of
the ordinance.
If the rezoning request is denied, the decision will be consistent
with the zoning ordinance by not encouraging business operation in
the Neighborhood Conservation District.
The request, if approved, would be consistent with the zoning
ordinance by not encouraging business operation in the
Neighborhood Conservation District. The purpose of the
Neighborhood Conservation District would be supported. The
subject property is thirty feet from the nearest Mixed Use District on
the edge of the Neighborhood Conservation District.
2. Compatible with Surrounding Land Uses. Whether and the extent
to which the proposed amendment is compatible with existing and
proposed adjacent land uses and is the appropriate district for the
subject property.
The property may be considered undesirable residential property
due to its proximity to the railroad tracks, but there are many
existing homes in the area closer to the tracks than this property. If
the request is denied, the property may become more desirable for
residential use because its commercial use will no longer be an
option. Residential users are currently on the south and west sides
of the property.
North of the subject property is a commercial establishment. Its
proximity to an established Mixed Use District and its proximity to
an established railroad track may make it undesirable residential
property.
3. Changed Conditions. Whether and the extent to which there are
changed conditions that require an amendment.
970213 -6
Minutes of Regular Meeting - February 13, 1997
There are no changed conditions in this area since the zoning
ordinance was adopted by council. The building has remained
vacant for over twelve months; therefore, it is not subject to
It grandfathering" under the ordinance. The structure has not been
maintained for several years except for recent exterior painting and
interior flooring. A visual inspection of the property was conducted
by the Inspection Department and the following items are needed
to bring the structure up to City Code. A conservative estimate for
the following work totals over $4,300. The structure and property
are on the tax rolls for $11,800.
a. Comply with ADA, restrooms and ramps.
b. Repair or replace rotten wood around the exterior,
mainly overhanging facias.
C. Remove the illegal addition on the rear of the building
that is in poor condition.
d. Bring electrical service up to code by master
electrician.
e. Bring hot water heater and plumbing up to code by
master plumber.
There are no changed conditions that require the amendment.
However, the area is an established neighborhood where no new
development is anticipated. A vacant commercial establishment in
this area could be detrimental to the stability of the neighborhood.
4. Effect on Natural Environment. Whether and the extent to which
the proposed amendment would not result in significant adverse
natural environmental impacts including but not limited to water, air,
noise, stormwater management, wildlife, vegetation, wetlands, and
the natural functioning of the environment.
When the store was open several years ago, the police responded
to several incidents due to people congregating in the vicinity of the
store. The noise and traffic of these incidents adversely impacted
the neighborhood.
The Commission foresees no adverse impact on the natural
environment.
970213 -7
Minutes of Regular Meeting - February 13, 1997
5. Demonstrated Community Need. Whether and the extent to which
the proposed amendment addresses a demonstrated community
need as evidenced in the case of a substantive amendment by an
advisory referendum vote of the electors.
There is no need for additional Mixed Use property as
demonstrated by the vacant property across the street classified as
Mixed Use.
There is no need for additional Mixed Use property; however, there
is a need in this segment of the community for a convenience
store. It is not allowed in a Neighborhood Conservation District, but
the subject property is very close (thirty feet) to a Mixed Use
District. The existing property will not develop as a single - family
structure in the future if left as Neighborhood Conservation.
6. Logical and Orderly Development Pattern. Whether and the extent
to which the proposed amendment would result in a logical
development pattern and not constitute spot zoning.
Denying the reclassification request will affirm the development
pattern approved by council when the district lines were drawn and
will eliminate a reclassification that could set a precedent for future
decisions.
The amendment would not constitute spot zoning and would result
in a logical and orderly development pattern. The amendment
would extend an existing Mixed Use District to encompass this site.
Council Member Hinds moved to adopt the ordinance. Council Member
Escontrias seconded the motion.
Council Member Benavides commented that since there was no
convenience store in the area, the neighborhood would benefit. She also
pointed out that the residents in the area were not protesting the change.
Council Member Byford stated that even if the present owner did not sell alcohol,
some future owner might. Council Member Escontrias emphasized that even
though he seconded the motion, he was concerned that changing the
classification would set a precedent for the future. Council Member Pruett felt
that the property would become an eyesore if it was not renovated as a store.
Council Member DonCarlos said that he did not believe the property met the
criteria required and that the purpose of zoning was to secure the residential
areas. The vote follows:
970213 -8
Minutes of Regular Meeting - February 13, 1997
Ayes: Council Members Benavides and Pruett
Nays: Council Members Byford, Escontrias,
Hinds, and DonCarlos
Mayor Alfaro
Consider Proposed Resolution No. 1300, Endorsing the Test Project for
Reforestation and Visual Enhancements Project at the Central Wastewater
Treatment Plant with the Texas Forest Service Public Outreach Grant
Program
The proposed resolution authorizes the City Manager to execute a
contract with the Texas Forest Service. The Baytown Rotary Club has donated
$5,000 toward this project and labor to plant the trees at the Central District
Plant. The project is designed to screen the plant from Highway 146 and the
Phase II Goose Creek Stream Park that will be located across the creek from the
plant. The planting has been accomplished, but the resolution is required as part
of the grant process. Council Member Hinds moved to adopt the resolution.
Council Member Benavides seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Council Members Benavides, Byford, Escontrias,
Hinds, DonCarlos, and Pruett
Mayor Alfaro
Nays: None
RESOLUTION NO. 1300
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BAYTOWN, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE APPROPRIATE
REPRESENTATIVE TO EXECUTE AGREEMENTS ASSOCIATED
WITH THE "URBAN FORESTRY PUBLIC OUTREACH GRANT
PROGRAM" OF THE TEXAS FOREST SERVICE REQUEST AND
COMMITTING SHARED COST OF THE PROJECT AS
DESCRIBED IN THE GRANT APPLICATION; AND PROVIDING
FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF.
970213 -9
Minutes of Regular Meeting - February 13, 1997
Consent Agenda
The Council considered the consent agenda items "a" through "j."
a. Proposed Resolution No. 1301, authorizes the City Manager to
apply for a federal grant in the amount of $283,882 from the Office
of National Drug Control Policy in conjunction with the Houston
High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area Grant Program. The money
awarded will continue to pay the administrative and operational
costs of the Director of the Houston HIDTA for the period 1 -1 -97 to
12- 31 -97. Council approved the Professional Services Agreement
between the City and Director Stanley Furce in September 1996.
The Director and the Executive Committee are responsible for the
systematic approach to regional drug law enforcement in the
Houston and Galveston area. The City is the managing agent for
the federal grant and we have received this grant since October of
1995. There are no City funds included.
We recommend approval.
b. Proposed Ordinance No. 970213 -4, authorizes an industrial district
agreement with First Chemical Company, L.P. for a seven -year
period. This is the first industrial agreement with First Chemical
Company, as the company has not yet started construction of its
manufacturing facility which will be located within Industrial District
No. 3 on property leased from Bayer Corporation. The facility will
have an estimated value of $40,000,000. It is projected that
nineteen permanent jobs and four contract jobs will be created as a
result of the construction and operation of the facility.
We recommend approval.
C. Proposed Ordinance No. 970213 -5, approves a contract with
Thos. Y. Pickett & Company, Inc. for Baytown Industrial District
appraisals in the amount of $22,000. The City contracts with
Thos. Y. Pickett to provide the valuations of properties for the City's
industrial districts and general advice on planning and on the
impact of any pollution control exemptions granted by TNRCC.
This contract has increased $2,000 due to the increased number of
entities and the tracking of pollution exemptions and is for the
calendar year beginning January 1, 1997.
We recommend approval.
970213 -10
Minutes of Regular Meeting - February 13, 1997
d. Proposed Ordinance No. 970213 -6, awards the bid for renovation
of the Roseland Park Boat Ramp Project and the related parking lot
to D & W Construction Company in the amount of $282,968.65.
We received five bids. The construction plans involve renovating
the existing ramps, new access points to the ramps, an asphalt
overlay of the parking area near the ramps, and additional lighting.
The ramps will be out of service during the months of March and
April, and the project should be complete by May 1. Our
consultants, Busch, Hutchison & Associates, have reviewed the
bids and recommend approval. Funds in the amount of $82,968.65
will come from the 1991 Parks Bond program and a $200,000 grant
from the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department.
We recommend approval.
e. Proposed Ordinance No. 970213 -7, awards the housing
rehabilitation contract for 3314 Michigan to Investment Group, Inc.
in the amount of $17,090. Six bid packages were picked up and
three were returned. Rehabilitation includes installing sheetrock,
exterior doors, an attic stairway, floorcoverings, electrical, and
plumbing systems, and an HVAC unit. The office estimate was
$20,092.79.
We recommend approval.
f. Proposed Ordinance No. 970213 -8, awards the housing
rehabilitation contract for 207 Hines to Colts Development in the
amount of $19,661. Six bid packages were picked up and three
were returned. Rehabilitation includes demolishing and
reconstructing a bedroom, installing sheetrock, repairing kitchen
cabinets, demolishing the front porch, rebuilding deck, foundation
repair, installing new plumbing and electrical systems, an HVAC
unit and a new roof. The office estimate was $20,946.91.
We recommend approval
g. Proposed Ordinance No. 970213 -9, awards the bid for a 2 Y2 ton
utility truck with a 20 foot flatbed body from H -GAC in the amount
of $39,563.17. The truck will be used by the Public Works
Drainage Division.
We recommend approval.
970213 -11
Minutes of Regular Meeting - February 13, 1997
h. Proposed Ordinance No. 970213 -10, awards the annual
photographic supplies contract to The Keepsake in the amount of
$23,021. Invitations to Bid were mailed to four suppliers and we
received three bids. This contract is used by various departments.
We recommend approval.
Proposed Ordinance No. 970213 -11, awards the annual
ammunition contract for the Police Department as follows:
Items 1, 2 & 3 G T Distributors $ 4,044.96
Items 4 & 5 Texas State Distributors 24.400.00
TOTAL $28,444.96
We recommend approval.
j. Proposed Ordinance No. 970213 -12, awards the bid for removal
and replacement of the roof at the City Hall Annex to American
Roofing Company in the amount of $89,400. Invitations to Bid
were mailed to five suppliers and we received two bids and one no-
bid. Two bids were sent back because the bid bond was not
submitted with the bids. Funds for this project are included under
the 1991 Bond Program.
We recommend approval.
Council Member Escontrias moved to approve the consent agenda items
"a" through "j." Council Member DonCarlos seconded the motion. The vote
follows:
Ayes: Council Members Benavides, Byford, Escontrias,
Hinds, DonCarlos, and Pruett
Mayor Alfaro
Nays: None
970213 -12
Minutes of Regular Meeting - February 13, 1997
RESOLUTION NO. 1301
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OF THE
CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS, TO MAKE APPLICATION TO THE
OFFICE OF NATIONAL DRUG CONTROL POLICY FOR A
GRANT IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE HIGH INTENSITY DRUG
TRAFFICKING AREA PROJECT; DESIGNATING AN
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE; AUTHORIZING THE
REPRESENTATIVE TO ACCEPT OR AFFIRM ANY GRANT
AWARD THAT MAY RESULT THEREFROM; AND PROVIDING
FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF.
ORDINANCE NO. 7894
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR
TO EXECUTE AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST TO AN
INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT AGREEMENT WITH FIRST CHEMICAL
COMPANY, L.P.; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE
THEREOF.
ORDINANCE NO. 7895
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY
MANAGER TO EXECUTE AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST
TO AN INDUSTRIAL APPRAISAL SERVICES CONTRACT WITH
THOS. Y. PICKETT & COMPANY, INC.; AUTHORIZING
PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, THE SUM OF
TWENTY -TWO THOUSAND AND NO1100 DOLLARS
($22,000.00); MAKING OTHER PROVISIONS RELATED
THERETO; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE
THEREOF.
ORDINANCE NO. 7896
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR
AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AND ATTEST TO A
CONTRACT WITH D &W CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR THE
RENOVATION OF THE BOAT RAMPS AND RELATED PARKING
LOT AT ROSELAND PARK; AUTHORIZING PAYMENT OF THE
SUM OF TWO HUNDRED EIGHTY -TWO THOUSAND NINE
HUNDRED SIXTY -EIGHT AND 651100 DOLLARS ($282,968.65);
MAKING OTHER PROVISIONS RELATED THERETO; AND
PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF.
970213 -13
Minutes of Regular Meeting - February 13, 1997
ORDINANCE NO. 7897
AN ORDINANCE AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT NO.
97 -01 TO INVESTMENT GROUP, INC., FOR THE SUM OF
SEVENTEEN THOUSAND NINETY AND NO /100 DOLLARS
($17,090.00); AUTHORIZING PAYMENT THEREOF; MAKING
OTHER PROVISIONS RELATED THERETO; AND PROVIDING
FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF.
ORDINANCE NO. 7898
AN ORDINANCE AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT NO.
97 -02 TO COLTS DEVELOPMENT FOR THE SUM OF NINETEEN
THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED SIXTY -ONE AND NO1100 DOLLARS
($19,661.00); AUTHORIZING PAYMENT THEREOF; MAKING
OTHER PROVISIONS RELATED THERETO; AND PROVIDING
FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF.
ORDINANCE NO. 7899
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF BAYTOWN,
TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT OF THIRTY -NINE
THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED SIXTY -THREE AND 171100
DOLLARS ($39,563.17) TO HOUSTON- GALVESTON AREA
COUNCIL FOR THE PURCHASE OF A TWO- AND - ONE -HALF (2-
1/2) TON UTILITY TRUCK WITH A FLATBED BODY; MAKING
OTHER PROVISIONS RELATED THERETO; AND PROVIDING
FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF.
ORDINANCE NO. 7900
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF THE KEEPSAKE
FOR THE ANNUAL PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES CONTRACT
AND AUTHORIZING PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN,
THE SUM OF TWENTY -THREE THOUSAND TWENTY -ONE AND
NO1100 DOLLARS ($23,021.00); MAKING OTHER PROVISIONS
RELATED THERETO; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE
DATE THEREOF.
970213 -14
Minutes of Regular Meeting - February 13, 1997
ORDINANCE NO. 7901
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BIDS OF G T
DISTRIBUTORS, INC., AND TEXAS STATE DISTRIBUTORS
FOR THE ANNUAL AMMUNITION CONTRACT AND
AUTHORIZING PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, THE
SUM OF TWENTY -EIGHT THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED
FORTY -FOUR AND 961100 DOLLARS ($28,444.96); MAKING
OTHER PROVISIONS RELATED THERETO; AND PROVIDING
FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF.
ORDINANCE NO. 7902
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF AMERICAN
ROOFING COMPANY FOR THE REMOVAL AND
REPLACEMENT OF THE ROOF AT CITY HALL ANNEX AND
AUTHORIZING PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, THE
SUM OF EIGHTY -NINE THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED AND
N01100 DOLLARS ($89,400.00); MAKING OTHER PROVISIONS
RELATED THERETO; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE
DATE THEREOF.
Consider Proposed Resolution No. 1302, Designating the City of Baytown
Representative and Alternate to the Houston - Galveston Area Council
General Assembly
Council Member DonCarlos moved to appoint Pete C. Alfaro as the
Representative of the City of Baytown to the Board of Directors and the General
Assembly of the Houston - Galveston Area Council for 1997 and E. Frank Hinds
as Alternate. Council Member Byford seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Council Members Benavides, Byford, Escontrias,
Hinds, DonCarlos, and Pruett
Mayor Alfaro
Nays: None
970213 -15
Minutes of Regular Meeting - February 13, 1997
RESOLUTION NO. 1302
A RESOLUTION APPOINTING PETE C. ALFARO AS THE
REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN TO THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF
THE HOUSTON - GALVESTON AREA COUNCIL FOR THE YEAR
1997 AND E. FRANK HINDS AS ALTERNATE SHOULD PETE C.
ALFARO BECOME INELIGIBLE OR RESIGN; AND PROVIDING
FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF.
For bid tabulations, see Attachments "A" through "E."
Consider Appointments to Baytown Area Community Long -Range Planning
Commission
Council will consider these appointments at a future meeting.
Consider appointments to the Growth Management and Development
Advisory Commission and the Baytown Zoning Commission
Council will consider these appointments at a future meeting.
Consider Appointments to Electrical Board
Council will consider these appointments at a future meeting.
Consider Appointments to Community Development Advisory Committee
Council will consider these appointments at a future meeting.
City Manager's Report
Tax Incremental Financing Program
Two meetings have been held with Goose Creek Consolidated
Independent School District and Lee College.
Hotel Study Team
A report will be given on February 24 to the administration.
970213 -16
Minutes of Regular Meeting - February 13, 1997
Adjourn
As there was no further business to be transacted, the meeting was
adjourned.
Eileen P. Hall, City Clerk
PROPOSAL FOR ROSELAND PARK BOAT RAHP RENOVATIONS AND PARKING LOT ADDITION
BID TABULATION
B1D
O d N
BEAN CONSTRUCTION
ANGEL BROTkERS
L 0 CONSTRUCTION
C C CARLTCN
ITEM
QUANTITIES
UNIT
BIO ITEM DESCRIPTION ANO UNIT PRICE BIO
N0.
4IRITTEN IN 1JORD5
UNIT
PRICE
TOTAL
UNIT
PRICE
TOTAL
UNIT
PRICE
TOTAL
UNIT
PRICE
TOTAL
UNIT
PRICE
TOTAL
1.
1.8
Acre
Clearing and Grubbing Construction Site,
Complete in Place
52,550.00
4.590.00
(650.00
1.170.00
1.500.00
2,700.00
10.000.00
18.000.00
15.000.00
69.000.00
2.
150
S.Y,
Remove Existing Concrete Boat Raps,
C lete in Place
32.80
4.920.00
6.50
975.00
35.00
5.250.00
25.00
3.750.00
130.00
19.500.00
3.
600
S.Y,
Remove a Portion of Existing Asphalt and
Material. Complete in Place
4.65
2.790.00
1.45
1.170.00
6.00
3.600.00
5.00
J.000.00
10.00
6.000.00
4.
All
Lump Sum
Ramp Excavation arsd Slope Preparation,
Complete in Place
1J.600.D0
13,600.00
6.175.00
6,175.00
11,000.00
11.000.00
24,000.00
2a,000.00
32.000.00
32.000.00
5.
1.175
C.Y.
Dredging and Spoil for Ramp Installation
as Shown on Drawings. Complete in Place
18.45
21.678.75
15.60
18.330.00
17.00
19.975.00
23.00
2).025.00
9.00
10.575.00
6.
All
Lump Sum
Spoil Storage Area Preparation and Spoil
Placement. Including Dike and Shaplrtq,
as Shown on Drawings. Complete in Place
6.350.00
6.350.00
7.150.00
7,150.00
7,000.00
7.000.00
7,000.00
T,OD0.00
6.000.00
6.000.GO
7.
650
L.Y.
Excavation from New Parking Area.
Complete in Place
9.40
6.435.00
4.55
2.957.50
8.00
5.200.00
15.00
9.750.00
b.00
J,900.00
8.
1.770
S.F.
6' Concrete Approach for Boat Ramps as
Shown on Drawings, Complete in Place
2.55
4.513.50
4.55
8.053.50
4.30
7.611.00
6.50
11.505.00
1.00
12.390.00
9.
2.208
S.f.
7 1/2' Concrete Boat Ramp as Shown nn
Drawings. Complete in Place
).45
16,449.60
5.66
12.497.26
8.25
18,216.00
10.00
22.080.00
9.00
19.812.00
10.
532
Gal.
Cut Back Asphalt Tack Caat (0.10
gal. /S.Y.I. Complete in Place
2.00
1.064.00
2.80
1.489.60
1.25
665.00
2.00
1.064.00
2.50
1.330.00
11.
816
Ton
Class D 1C�1AC for Constructing Parking
Lot. Complete in Place
43.10
35.169.60
50.20
40.463.20
45.00
36.720.00
41.00
33.456.00
44.00
35.904.00
12.
1.142
Gal.
MC30 Prime Coat for Parking Lot
Construction (0.25 - 0.35 gal. /S.Y.).
C lete in Place
1.85
2.112.70
2.40
2.740.00
1.50
1.113.00
1.SD
1.113.00
2.20
2.512.40
Page 1 of 4
PROPOSAL FOR ROSELAND PARK BOAT RAND RENOVATIONS ANO PARKING LOT ADDITION
BID TABULATION
slo
D E N
BEAR CONSTRUCTION
ANGEL BROTHERS
L D CONSTRUCTION
C C WiLTON
ITEM
QUANTITIES
UN17
BID ITEM OESLRIPT[ON AND UNIT PRICE BID
N0.
wRl1TEH [N 1JORD5
UNIT
PRICE
TOTAL
UNIT
PRICE
TOTAL
UNiT
PRICE
i'OTAL
UNiT
PRICE
TOTAL
UNIT
PRICE
TOTAL
13.
1.060
Ton
Crushed Limestone for Base, Complete in
Place
19.85
21.041.00
22.75
24.115.00
28.50
30.210.00
23.00
24.380.00
22.00
23.320.00
14.
87
Ton
Lime Slurry for Subgrade. Complete in
Place
111.50
9.7D0.50
110.00
9.570.00
85.00
7.395.00
100.00
8.100.00
100.00
8.700.00
15.
4,567
S.Y.
Mixlrtg and Canpacting b' Lime Stabilized
Subgrade. 24 Ib. /S.Y.. Complete in Place
1.25
5.708.75
2.60
11.874.20
1.50
6.850.50
2.00
9.134.00
4.00
18.2b8.00
16.
All
lump Sum
Electrical far Boat Ramp and Parking
Area, including Hiring, Conduct. light
Fixtures and Standards. Complete 1n
Place
18.270.00
18.270.00
20.000.00
20.000.00
15.000.00
15.000.00
18.000.00
18.000.00
17.400.00
17.000.00
17.
50
L.f.
6' Handicapped Pier with Toe Ratl as
Shawn an Drawings. Complete in Place
192.20
9.610.00
325.00
16.250.00
200.00
10.000.00
1)5.00
8.750.00
215.00
13.750.00
18.
50
L.f.
4' Launching Pier Between Boat Ramps as
Shown an Drawings. Conglete in Place
167.50
8.315.00
227.50
11.375.00
160.00
8.000.00
200.00
10.000.00
160.00
8.000.00
19.
50
L.F.
4' Launching Pier as Shawn on Orawirtgs.
Complete in Place
142.00
7.100.00
227.50
11.375.00
140.00
7.000.00
160.00
8.000.00
230.00
11.500.00
20.
133
L.f.
6' Courtesy Pier as Shown an Drawings.
Complete in Place
138.00
18.354.00
280.00
37.240.00
140.00
18.620.00
170.00
22.6!0.00
250.00
33.250.00
21.
203
L.F.
Hood Bulkheading as Shown an the
Drawings. Complete in Place
257.00
52.171.00
162.50
32.987.50
300.00
60.900.00
205.00
41.b15.00
200.OD
40.600.00
22.
2,835
S.F.
Stri in Parki lot. Complete in Place
0.95
2.693.25
0.65
1.842.75
0.50
1.411.50
2.00
5.610.00
1.D0
2.835.00
23.
All
Lump Sum
Signage as Required by Grant and Shown
an Drawings. Complete in Place
987.00
987.00
4.550.00
4.550.00
2.500.00
2.5D0.00
3.OD0.00
3.000.00
2.000.00
2.000.00
24.
310
L.F.
Galvanized Steel Beam Guard Fence. Gf
(TD1- -750 MOD per State Dept. Of
Highways and Public Transportation,
inCiudi End Flares. C fete in Place
18.00
6.660.00
23.10
8.547.00
21.00
7.770.00
15.00
5.550.00
16.00
5.920.00
Page 2 of 4
PROPOSAL FOR ROSELAND PARK BOAT RAMP RENOVATIONS AND PARKING LOT ADDITION
BID TABULATION
BID
0 8 w
BEJW CONSTRUCTION
ANGEL BROTHERS
L D CONSTRUCTION
C G CARLTON
ITEH
QUANTITIES
UN1T
BID ITEM DESCRIPTION AND UNIT PRICE B[D
N0.
isR[TTEN [N NORDS
UNIT
PRICE
TOTAL
UNIT
PRICE
TOTAL
UNIT
PRICE
TOTAI.
UNIT
PRICE
TDTAL
UNIT
PRICE
TOTAL
25.
25
Tan
Base failure Repair wfth Black Base
Asphalt fOr Repair Of Existing Asphalt
Paving Base Failure as Determined by
Contractor and Approved by Engineer.
Complete in Place
105.00
2.625.00
58.50
1.462.50
75.00
1.875.00
200.00
5.000.00
120.00
3.000.00
TOTAL BASE BID
5282.468.65
1294.860.03
5297.188.00
5332.752.00
5347.126.40
Page 3 of 4
d
un
m
0
A
Q
O
0
H
m
.D
m
Q
cp
�a
--1
O
Z
H
Q
-1
O
a.
Qz
cps
7 v
y 4p
N y O
O
z N
O p
N=
7 b
y
10n
M
b D
W
o
O
N
M e+
b
cx
r 10
r
r
r
rbf 7
n b_
2
y
a-
o
ny
mxv
n8y
m o
n
arm
o
np
��
y
eo
D �D
N rp m
va A A
vyh N m
z m
N N
G� 7
�'_
� '_
�CA
b~
gas
b
aas
�:a91
A
N n
L b
b N
b
�DD
0
0
�c /o
r �p
pro
d o
app
� f'f N
ryo
a f1 N
rv�p
G IR N
n
o n
x
mrxx
oxx
y
CL
rn
,a
0
N
O
b
0
0
o
v�az
b
n
p
CL
m
n
p
n
my
�
�e
o
o
o.
s
N
O
O
O
C
p
p
p
y
H
G
n
n
f
R
w
b
(n
o
�'
n -4
m
e+
b
Ln
O
N
(A
O,
O
to
6
O�
(Nl1
O
Z
N
10
N
O
O
0
0
�
m
CL
m
n
m
n
rnn=i
0
0
0
a
n
06
r
p
o
m
n
p
a
A �
J
O
O
O
p
p
p
yy
O
y
V
n
n
n
n
A C
2
l'7
o
0
o
n
i
rn
a
N
G
V
ip
i7
O
O
O
Q
O
0
H
m
.D
m
Q
cp
�a
--1
O
Z
H
Q
-1
O
a.
Qz
N
O
v
w
N
hJ
�D.
Y
W
0
0
0
Y
�ro
Y
N
Y
0
Attachment "B"
ro
0
o n
Y
HH
d
>HH
F3 tj F3
H
0
u;
l J
H
a O
bd
ro
H
ro
phi
0 C
�
'o
H
n lFn
0
N
z
rww
Y
�ro
Y
N
Y
0
t1i H
ro
0
o n
Y
HH
0
H
u;
H
a O
bd
ro
�
'o
rrr
rl
N
z
7
ro
H
n
t1i H
ro
Y
0
H
u;
�
rrr
0
(D
0
rr
J
i
0
N
W
w
Y
A
r•
w
h
H
H
H
0
z
ro
0
m
0
ro
H
n
ro
H
0
m
Y
Y
A
Fl-
Ln
0
co
Y
rD
cn
>HHH
HtjH
M ., r
11 rlt
L `+
7 O N
y m r•
I
I
r•
rr
a
0
w()
H
dF3
HO
a4
�td
r>
Hy
HO
0�
zz
slh /c /9711 -17 TABULATION ANNUAL PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES CONTRACT Page 1 of 4
CITY OF BAYTOWN
BID TABULATION
TITLE ANNUAL PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES CONTRACT
BID #: 9711 -17
DATE JANUARY 7,1997 2:00 P.M.
1 /2�' "'
CAMERAS ETC.
SOUTHWESTERN
THE KEEPSAKE; ; ��- •.���',
ITEM
QTY.
UNIT
DESCRIPTION
UNIT PRICE
EXT.PRICE
UNIT PRICE
EXT.PRICE
:UNIT:PRICE
EXT.PRICE
1. FILM (ITEMS
#1 -27)
:,�- �.;�:+ i�.;c,r. `{ :
.;r'�.� � - -= `;
1.
20
rolls
Size 135, Black and White
3.03
60.60
3.29
65.80
�' ��: a�� :�:�3.00 �
� : :. '�.+ 60.00
TMY- 135 -24, T -MAX 400
Kodak
Kodak
Kodak - :
;" �: �•: � .
...
,
... .
2.
20
rolls
Size 135, Black and White
2.93
58.60
3.15
63.00
•- ' ' 2.75
'55.00
ASA 100, Kodak TMX- 135 -24
Kodak
Kodak
Kodak " � :
� • .
T -MAX 100
..
:., •,
. '.::.
� ,
3.
20
rolls
Size 135, Black and White
4.99
99.80
5.35
107.00
. =-'- •:.�.• -: 4.75
• . : -', 95.00
TMX- 135 -36, T -MAX 3200
Kodak
Kodak
Kodak', �• �;
.::_� -;. ;:�•;;, �.
4.
30
rolls
Size 135, Color Print, ASA 100 -12
2.35
70.50
2.60
78.00
=�:•�. �,,- ;•2.20.
• • �,'- :66.00
Kodak or Fuji 135
Fuji
Fuji
Fuji 1?: ° -' =:� • � :
,, -:��:�
,. ,, ,„
5.
20
rolls
Size 135, Color Print, ASA 100 -24
2.99
59.80
3.49
69.80
��'':�:'� ;,2.75
,-_c-:•;55.00'
Kodak or Fuji 135
Fuji
Fuji
Fuji:',.'• - ' �
•''•'�•.
�.�, r;:.. � .
6.
250
rolls
Size 135, Color Print, ASA 200 -12
2.79
697.50
2.89
722.50
.��';.`:.:•;, :- 2.60
': 650.00
Kodak or Fuji 135
Fuji
Fuji
. . ♦
Fuji.��• ° ' �
J•
J 1
� :�:�,:� �� ~�
w
7.
: 250
rolls
Size 135, Color Print, ASA 200 -24
3.69
922.50
3.79
947.50
�;���- :r.��;.3.00.•
: >:r•:�,�:750.00�
Kodak or Fuji 135
Fuji
Fu i
Fu i`� "�y:' � '�t i
' �t��,• +'�� +''' •'i
,..�.� ;
}':��i�il'� ?� fro(•
' -' a�+Y ,!'��f'��'R'.�i�'
8.
200
rolls
Size 135, Color Print, ASA 400 -12
2.99
598.00
3.15
630.00
�' �Pr;�:�2:80:
t�;��';�t.560:00'
Kodak or Fuji 135
Fuji
Fuji
Fuji °��£,��.����
3 : ?;y�,�;-
t��;�:�:f�:
��.�•�I�4�N:
9.
200
rolls
Size 135, Color Print, ASA 400 -24
3.89
778.00
3.95
790.00
:;"3.90'
t��`�1•�';7.80:00:
1 /2�' "'
slh /c /9711 -17 TABULATION ANNUAL PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES CONTRACT Page 2 of 4
CITY OF BAYTOWN
BID TABULATION
TITLE ANNUAL PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES CONTRACT
BID #: 9711 -17
DATE JANUARY 7,1997 2:00 P.M.
1 /27. ^'
CAMERAS ETC.
SOUTHWESTERN
THE KEEPSAKE' ;; ..
ITEM
QTY.
UNIT
DESCRIPTION
UNIT PRICE
EXT.PRICE
UNIT PRICE
EXT.PRICE
UNIT;PRICE
EXT.PRICE
Kodak or Fuji 135
Fuji
Fuji
Fuji - .. '' . .�.
. , a.>,:.: -.
:�;
10.
deleted
rolls
Discontinued /Deleted
11.
20
rolls
Size 135, Color Slide, ASA 200 -24
5.79
115.80
6.29
125.80
"''a >r: � 5.75'
•��?115.00
Kodak ektachrome slide of Fuji chrom
Fuji
Fuji
Fuji
+• �:
r'
Ektachrome
12.
20
rolls
Size 135, Color, ASA 400 -24
6.99
139.80
7.59
151.80
'� 7.10
�� 142.00
Kodak ektachrome or Fuji chrome
Fuji
Fuji
Fuji
.:.: � -+
, ..
13.
20
rolls
Ektachrome 64
94.34
1,886.80
93.39
1,867.80
� '.�:. `; :86.25
.: • 1,725.00
Professional #5017
Kodak
Kodak
Kodak �.; •���
•� ��••"• � •' '
� 1
! . .
100 foot roll 35mm slide
; ,• :; � : � �.
• �.rl •
••
� -ti r
.1
•
14.
20
rolls
Kodak High speed
8.79
175.80
8.70
174.00
I 7:45
'' ; -149.00
infrared, type HIE - 135 -36
Kodak
Kodak
Kodak :- :
••:
:• ��
't'. .
15.
deleted
rolls
Kodak versicolor III 120
roll film t e VPS -120
� - -�� -
ij .
16.
deleted
boxes
Kodak T Max 100 (Catalog #8020737
Black &White, 4x5 sheet film,
,;:ti"i� =�f ;:• --•_�
.:r .Y�r�T -.
•
25 sheets to a box
, :-• •,�•� ?� ,:. '�
,•, �. ,,.,�,:_-
17.
deleted
boxes
Kodak high speed infrared, 4143,
Black 8� white, 4x5 sheet film,
- -�•�' -
� ^� °••••• •• �•�^•
1 /27. ^'
slh /c /9711 -17 TABULATION ANNUAL PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES CONTRACT Page 3 of 4
CITY OF BAYTOWN
BID TABULATION
TITLE ANNUAL PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES CONTRACT
BID #: 9711 -17
DATE JANUARY 7,1997 2:00 P.M.
1/27
CAMERAS ETC.
SOUTHWESTERN
THE KEEPSAKE;';�:;•� �',;:,�,::,
ITEM
QTY.
UNIT
DESCRIPTION
UNIT PRICE
EXT.PRICE
UNIT PRICE
EXT.PRICE
UNIT -PRICE
;EXT:PRICE.�
25 sheets to a box
.. +:•� -�• ° y.;r
.i- .,...,� � , �•. %; • .
• ��•
� ,,
18.
12
boxes
Polaroid type 51, Black &White,
41.35
496.20
43.75
525.00
� 40.00
.� 480.00
4x5 sheet, 20 per box
Polaroid
Polaroid
Polaroid '� •f ►,
:.: ��::•�.• �,; .; ,
19.
12
boxes
Polaroid type 52, Black 8� White,
36.75
441.00
40.15
481.80
-� ��,; 41.00:
�•�: -� 492.00
4x5 sheet, 20 per box
Poloroid
Polaroid
Polaroid ��'��.:
�:�:�`�`1�:�;;:; .
.. �•;-,
-
20.
24
pkgs
Polaroid type 55, Black 8 White
39.45
946.80
41.65
999.60
• �• �- � 40.00.
-'��' 960.00
4x5 positive /negative, 20 per box
Poloroid
Polaroid
Polaroid �•r��
� :�•,,-:.' -�_��. �• -
s}
� �' •.•
21.
12
boxes
Polaroid type 59, Color,
58.29
fi99.48
61.75
741.00
•�-:'.:� �� 64.00
� :''� 768.00
4x5, 20 per box
Poloroid
Polaroid
Poloaroid "; =�
••'� = -' - � �� � •'��� ��-
•.4�'�f�'•. �. %. =2YC
�t Via.. � ,.
�.i:�.
22.
25
boxes
Polaroid type 665, black 8� white,
9.90
247.50
10.45
261.25
� � �: ����� 10.00
' :.•_•'_.: 250.00
positive /negative, 8 per pack
Poloroid
Polaroid
Polaroid
�- ; � �-
;� .
..
23.
60
pkgs
Polaroid type 667, black 8� white,
18.35
1,101.00
20.05
1,203.00
-• • z -- 18.40
,-;. -':1;104.00
8 per pack, twin packs
Poloroid
Polaroid
Polaroid �• -• < �
'•, :�• �' -'- -� - �•���.
.��
; _ ,
24.
12
cases
Polaroid type 669, color,
531.25
6,375.00
577.50
6,930.00
:• -,; ���:531.25•
•: ;,, 6,375.00
16 per box, twin packs, 25 twin packs
Poloroid
Polaroid
Polaroid ` �- .
'r = =• -� � � •
per case
�•� "~ •
��
33 , ...,.�..._
y�tr����
25.
10
cases
Polaroid type 600, color, 20 per pack,
640.50
6,405.00
720.00
7,200.00
t���;-;642.00�
: �'::� 6;420.00
double packs
Poloroid
Polaroid
Polaroid�.•.�:���_
�•i +:•a;:'�;� °-��:',�
.1. .�
:��': nr .�..
26.
20
pkgs
Polaroid type 559, color,
22.55
451.00
23.80
476.00
:: >,dK;�:r22.00:i�i��
}F440:00•
4 "x5" pack
Poloroid
Polaroid
Polaroid; .'. _
.. ,
1/27
sih/c/9711 -17 TABULATION ANNUAL PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES CONTRACT Page 4 of 4
TITLE ANNUAL PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES CONTRACT
BID #: 9711 -17
DATE JANUARY 7,1997
2:00 P.M.
CITY OF BAYTOWN
BID TABULATION
_� —_. ... ... - -.. � ....... ....... ... •Ja. •uuc wum
CAMERAS ETC. - $25,351.73 deletion of chemicals from the annual contract. The quantities used last
year were too small to be put on an annual contract.
.Mailed 4 bids &received 3 bids.
Jobar Scienlifc Company's bid was received by mail after Quantities for film remained the same as last year's bid.
the bid opening deadline. There is a 5% decrease overall this year for the same items as last year due to
competitiveness among suppliers.
1/27( L
CAMERAS ETC.
SOUTHWESTERN
THE KEEPSAKE -• -
ITEM
QTY.
UNIT
DESCRIPTION
UNIT PRICE
EXT.PRICE
UNIT PRICE
EXT.PRICE
UNIT PRICE
EXT.PRICE
27.
20
pkgs
Polaroid type 552, black &while,
14.95
299.00
16.20
324.00
.: � 10.00
� 200.00
4 "x5" pack
Poloroid
Polaroid
Polaroid � �
-
28.
1D0
pkgs
Advanced Photo Systems, speed
3.19
319.00
3.45
345.00
�- - 3.30
�� �: 330.00
200, 15 exposures. Kodak or Fuji
Fuji
Fuji
Fuji
acceptable. Ued by Fire Dept.
-
AWARDED TOTAL:
23,444.46
25,279.65
;.�
29,021.00
'
,�
LOCATION:
PASADENA,
TEXAS
HOUSTON, TEXAS
BAYTOWN;.TEXAS;;St
<;t�r.�
LAST YEAR'S
DELIVERY: 2 io 5 DAYS ARO 2 to 5 DAYS ARO 2 to'5 DAY5AR07Er•,F, -:i'-
BID. There is a 7P decreasa fhic vnar in fhn aw�.�lod r..r�i i��r „ems. a.... .,. .�._
_� —_. ... ... - -.. � ....... ....... ... •Ja. •uuc wum
CAMERAS ETC. - $25,351.73 deletion of chemicals from the annual contract. The quantities used last
year were too small to be put on an annual contract.
.Mailed 4 bids &received 3 bids.
Jobar Scienlifc Company's bid was received by mail after Quantities for film remained the same as last year's bid.
the bid opening deadline. There is a 5% decrease overall this year for the same items as last year due to
competitiveness among suppliers.
1/27( L
a�
v
8
v
�n
d
rr:c:LOTUS,97 -PAGE 1 9711 -11t
CITY OF BAYTOWN
BID TABULATION
TITLE ANNUAL AMMUNITION CONTRACT
BID #: 9711 -11
DATE JANUARY 23, 1997 2:00 P.M.
BLACK HILLS AMMUN.. INC. G T DISTRIBUTORS. INC_ c;ui f= sreTF rnsr
ITEM
}UNIT
QTY. (_ UNIT j DESCRIPTION I UNIT PRICE
PRICE SHALL 8E FOR EACH 1,000 ROUNDS
EXT. PRICE UNIT PRICE EXT. PRICE UNIT PRICE EXT. PRICE
I I
I
1
_ 4
_rounds
Shotgun Ammunition - Buckshot ! 0.00
-
NO BID
___347.84 1 391.36
NO BID
� NO BID
�IV11W
X6124 I
I
i
2
2
rounds
1�
Shotgun Ammunition -Slugs I 0.00
� NO BID
886.40 1 772.80
NO BID
NO BID
I_
((SABOT
�
SLUG ONLY
I
wwV- SR_SH12 _( �
(Sabot Slug j
� _
I
I I
I
I
3
6
_
rounds (Shotgun
1
Ammunition - Birdshot � 0.00
_
NO BID
146.8_0 880.80
VVI/V- AAH127.5
NO BID
NO BID
I –�
I
I
4
50
rounds
Pistol Ammunition (180 grain
239.00
11 950.00
348.60
REINI0MMI3
17,430.00
NO BID
NO BID
BLACK HILLS D10N1
I
5
50
rounds
Pistol Ammunition - (155 grain 249.00 12 450.00
0.00 NO BID
NO BID
NO BID
_
�
BLACK HILLS 1710N2
�
1
I
_
(SUPPLY POINT: (RAPID CITY, SO. DAKOTA
A_U_STIN, TX.
MONTGOMERY,AL j
DELIVERY: 30 DAYS ARO
30 DAYS ARO
30 DAYS ARO
AWARDED TOTALS: ITEM #4 & 5
24,400.00
ITEM #1,2,3 � 4,044.96
TOTAL
CONTRACT
AMOUNT: $28,444.96 �
�
Mailed,
GULF
received 2 bids and 1 no -bid. 1
STATES 01ST. SUBMITTED A NO -BID. (COULD NOT COMPETE AGAINST JOBBER
There , as a 2 %decrease this year over last year because
LAST YEA�t'S BID_':
the manufacturer decreased their
!
UNIT PRICF] EXT. PRIC
prices in order to be more competitive
'
in the industry.
ITEM
QTY
UNIT
DESCRIPTION
! —I
1
4
rounds
Shot un Ammunition - Buckshot
359.90
1,439.60
GT Distributors
2
2
rounds
Shot un Ammunition - Slu s
872.24
1,744.48
GT Distributars
3
6
rounds
Shot un Ammunition - Birdshot
132.70
796.20
GT Distributors
4
50
rounds
Pistol Ammunition - 180 grain
243.80
12,190.00
GT Distributors
5
50
rounds
Pistol Ammunition - 155 rain
258.00
12,900.00
Texas State Distributors
I
TOTAL:
29,070.28
02/05/97
w
Attachment "E"
0 ou -4
Ej
M -i
r
!t� rn
-n 4
M M
;C
113
;U 0
C: Co <
>
z
-L
—L 0
to ;u
CD M
0
M
9
M
z
--I
0
n
;o
0
0
n
0
0
z
z
M
x
C13
Ei
a]
z
0
0
0
:E
z
M
M
C
z
z
0
C
z
0
C
z
0
G
0
n
0
0
0
z
z
4
z
0
>
-- I
z
X
>
0
0
r-
M
0
--1
0
r-
0
M
I
0
>
>
z
U)
0
0
> -4
>
z
Cn
0
M
z
22
N
ch
z
2?
-0
C6
r,
Xr-
M
-0
-4
r-
M
x
—1
0
0
X
0
6
z
0
0
;o
0
6)
z
0
0
-n
0
n
z
z
X
cn
co
0
0
>
>
0
C
(33
Ei
a)
C
z
z
�z
z
<
Co
C
z
M
;o
U)
0
0
z
M
M
CD
>
z
M
0
X
p
z
0
�5
>
0
M
..x-
M
0
M
1;0
o
<X
4A
4A
En
0
C D
z
M
0
in
Co
00
M
X
�"n
E5
-xi
(J)
G)
A
0
CD
0
0
-Z
0
M
cn
cu
0
� o
M
C
C13
FD
a
I
z
Co
0
z
V)
z
r,
p
M
z
0
-0
0
0
0
CD Cl
O
0
N
>
in
:z
3:
Co
z
0
M(J)
><:�M
—
—L
M
�C)
:0
0
C)
M
:M
(n
C,
M
a)
:z
C
>
C
M
;0:0
0
MA
n
"n
M
><
03
M
rn
E5
X
z
0
M
M
0 ou -4
Ej
M -i
r
!t� rn
-n 4
M M
;C
113
;U 0
C: Co <
>
z
-L
—L 0
to ;u
CD M
0
M
9
M
z
--I
0
n
;o
0
0
n
0
0
z
z
M
x
C13
Ei
a]
z
0
0
0
:E
z
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL SESSION
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN
February 13, 1997
The City Council of the City of Baytown, Texas, met in special session on
February 13, 1997, at 6:00 p.m., in the John Tucker Lecture Hall, Lee College,
with the following in attendance:
Eva Benavides
Council Member
David Byford
Council Member
Manuel Escontrias
Council Member
E. Frank Hinds, Jr.
Council Member
Stephen DonCarlos
Council Member
Rolland J. Pruett
Council Member
Pete C. Alfaro
Mayor
Bobby Rountree
City Manager
Ignacio Ramirez
City Attorney
Eileen P. Hall
City Clerk
The meeting was opened with a quorum present after which Mayor Alfaro
recessed into executive session pursuant to Section 551.071 of the Texas
Government Code to discuss pending and contemplated litigation.
When the open meeting reconvened, Mayor Alfaro announced that no action
was necessary as a result of the executive session.
Adjourn
There being no further business to be transacted, the meeting was
adjourned.
Eileen P. Hall, City Clerk
minutes101- 13 -97spc