Loading...
1997 02 13 CC MinutesN MINUTES OF THE REGULAR SESSION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN February 13, 1997 The City Council of the City of Baytown, Texas, met in regular session on February 13, 1997, at 6:30 p.m., in the John Tucker Lecture Hall at Lee College, with the following in attendance: Eva Benavides David Byford Manuel Escontrias E. Frank Hinds, Jr. Stephen DonCarlos Rolland J. Pruett Pete C. Alfaro Bobby Rountree Ignacio Ramirez Eileen P. Hall Council Member Council Member Council Member Council Member Council Member Council Member Mayor City Manager City Attorney City Clerk The meeting was opened with a quorum present, and Council Member Escontrias offered the invocation, after which the following business was conducted: Consider Approval of Minutes for the Regular Session held on January 23, 1997 Council Member DonCarlos moved to approve the minutes for the meeting held on January 23, 1997, with the correction that Council Member Benavides was absent. Council Member Pruett seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council Members Benavides, Byford, Escontrias, Hinds, DonCarlos, and Pruett Mayor Alfaro Nays: None 970213 -2 Minutes for Regular Session - February 13, 1997 Consider Proposed Ordinance No. 970213 -2, Amending Agreement for Engineering Services Between the City of Baytown and Langford Engineering, Inc., for the Garth Road Manhole Repair Project This ordinance amends an agreement that originally included the repair of one manhole to design a repair for approximately 1,500 feet of 21 -inch concrete sewer pipe and manholes from Garth Road to the lift station near Spur 201. On February 3 the 21 -inch pipe downstream of the Garth Road manhole collapsed. Rather than perform a point repair, the City recommended pipe- bursting approximately 1600 feet of sewer pipe at an estimated construction cost of $250,000. The estimated engineering cost is $20,680. Council Member Escontrias moved to adopt the ordinance. Council Member DonCarlos seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council Members Benavides, Byford, Escontrias, Hinds, DonCarlos, and Pruett Mayor Alfaro Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 7892 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF BAYTOWN AND LANGFORD ENGINEERING, INC., FOR REROUTING A TWENTY -ONE INCH SEWER LINE ON GARTH ROAD IN THE AMOUNT OF TWENTY THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED EIGHTY AND NO1100 DOLLARS ($20,680.00); AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF. Consider Proposed Ordinance No. 970213 -3, Authorizing Agreement with Planergy, Inc., for implementing an Electric Curtailment Program Between June 1 and September 30 Each Year The HL &P Planergy Curtailment program gives the City and the Baytown Area Water Authority the opportunity to participate in a program designed to provide rebates to commercial and industrial customers who agree to curtail (shed) loads for brief periods during HL &P peak demands. A study has been conducted at BAWA and at the East District Wastewater Treatment Plant to determine the amount of load each plant can curtail for a three -hour period and provide acceptable service during the curtailment period. 970213 -3 Minutes of Regular Meeting - February 13, 1997 The number of requests by HL &P to curtail load is limited to fifteen three - hour occurrences during the four -month summer period from June 1 to September 30. The notification time is one hour prior to the start of the load reduction with a maximum request of three hours per pay only on weekday afternoons between the hours of 12:00 noon and 8:00 p.m. Curtailment will not occur on weekends or holidays. The baseline kilowatt usage that the reduction will be calculated from will be the kilowatt usage of the plant one hour prior to the call to reduce load. The contract with HL &P will be satisfied if the demand curtailment is at least 75% of the contracted amount. Monitoring equipment will be provided to each plant as part of the contract. This equipment will enable each plant to monitor the load curtailment and can be used to monitor the load 24 hours a day even when not under any curtailment period. The rebate is paid by check or credited to the electric bill for the period of June 1 to September 30 whether HL &P requires a curtailment of power demand or not. The City will be paid $4,680 and BAWA $10,920 annually. Council Member Escontrias moved to adopt the ordinance. Council Member Benavides seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council Members Benavides, Byford, Escontrias, Hinds, DonCarlos, and Pruett Mayor Alfaro Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 7893 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST TO AN AGREEMENT WITH PLANERGY, INC., FOR IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRIC CURTAILMENT PROGRAM; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF. Hold Public Hearing On The Proposed Amendment To The Official Zoning Map Of The City Of Baytown, Reclassifying Property Located At 1201 Lindberg From Neighborhood Conservation District To A Mixed Use District At 6:40 P.M. Mayor Alfaro called to order the public hearing concerning the proposed amendment to the official zoning map of the City of Baytown reclassifying the property located at 1201 Lindberg from Neighborhood Conservation District to a Mixed Use District. He asked that everyone desiring to speak at the hearing sign 970213 -4 Minutes of Regular Meeting - February 13, 1997 the list in the foyer if they had not already done so as that list would provide the speaking order for the hearing. He stated that the hearing was for the purpose of receiving input with regard to the proposed property reclassification and that everyone desiring to present information would be given ample opportunity to do so. He encouraged each speaker to be as brief and to the point as possible. He stressed that this was not an adversarial -type proceeding and that the purpose was to give all interested persons an opportunity to be heard on the proposal. He said that if anyone had any questions, they should be directed to him and with the aid of City staff, he would attempt to have the questions answered. The City Manager said that 1201 Lindberg is the address of an old convenience store located south of Robert E. Lee High School at the intersection of Carnegie and Lindberg. It is located south of the school district's old bus barn. A vacant lot is to the northeast, residential structures are to the south, and the Carnegie Street right -of -way followed by a residential structure to the west. The property currently abuts the boundary line of a Mixed Use District but is located in a Neighborhood Conservation District. It has been closed for over twelve months; therefore, it is not a permitted NC use. Rezoning the property to a MU district would permit the applicant to reopen the convenience store at this location. Letters have been mailed to all residents within 300 feet of the property and a sign was posted on the property of the possible reclassification. In response to inquiry from Council, Mr. Ricardo Valdez, the applicant, stated that he had lived in Baytown two years, that he did not plan to sell alcohol at that location, and that he did believe there were enough people in the area to support the business. There being no others desiring to speak, Mayor Alfaro closed this public hearing. Consider Proposed Ordinance No. 970213 -1, Amending the Official Zoning Map of the City of Baytown for Property Located at 1201 Lindberg from Neighborhood Conservation to Mixed Use The City Manager explained that the Baytown Zoning Commission held one public hearing regarding this matter and had prepared a report along with a recommendation of approval. The Commission made their decision based on the staff analysis and comments from the applicant. Their decision to recommend reclassification may be reasonable due to the proximity of the Mixed Use District. Issues along district lines are difficult ones. This commercial building is not in the center of a Neighborhood Conservation District; therefore, there may be a tendency to allow its use. There are, however, residential 970213 -5 Minutes of Regular Meeting - February 13, 1997 structures on two sides. It has been closed for over twelve months and is not eligible for "grandfathering." Section 35- 17(b)(4)(g) of the Code of Ordinances provides six criteria for City council to consider when determining a proposed amendment. Listed below are the criteria, the administration's response, and the response of the commission, respectively. 1. Consistent with the Zoning Ordinance. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would conflict with any portion of the ordinance. If the rezoning request is denied, the decision will be consistent with the zoning ordinance by not encouraging business operation in the Neighborhood Conservation District. The request, if approved, would be consistent with the zoning ordinance by not encouraging business operation in the Neighborhood Conservation District. The purpose of the Neighborhood Conservation District would be supported. The subject property is thirty feet from the nearest Mixed Use District on the edge of the Neighborhood Conservation District. 2. Compatible with Surrounding Land Uses. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment is compatible with existing and proposed adjacent land uses and is the appropriate district for the subject property. The property may be considered undesirable residential property due to its proximity to the railroad tracks, but there are many existing homes in the area closer to the tracks than this property. If the request is denied, the property may become more desirable for residential use because its commercial use will no longer be an option. Residential users are currently on the south and west sides of the property. North of the subject property is a commercial establishment. Its proximity to an established Mixed Use District and its proximity to an established railroad track may make it undesirable residential property. 3. Changed Conditions. Whether and the extent to which there are changed conditions that require an amendment. 970213 -6 Minutes of Regular Meeting - February 13, 1997 There are no changed conditions in this area since the zoning ordinance was adopted by council. The building has remained vacant for over twelve months; therefore, it is not subject to It grandfathering" under the ordinance. The structure has not been maintained for several years except for recent exterior painting and interior flooring. A visual inspection of the property was conducted by the Inspection Department and the following items are needed to bring the structure up to City Code. A conservative estimate for the following work totals over $4,300. The structure and property are on the tax rolls for $11,800. a. Comply with ADA, restrooms and ramps. b. Repair or replace rotten wood around the exterior, mainly overhanging facias. C. Remove the illegal addition on the rear of the building that is in poor condition. d. Bring electrical service up to code by master electrician. e. Bring hot water heater and plumbing up to code by master plumber. There are no changed conditions that require the amendment. However, the area is an established neighborhood where no new development is anticipated. A vacant commercial establishment in this area could be detrimental to the stability of the neighborhood. 4. Effect on Natural Environment. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would not result in significant adverse natural environmental impacts including but not limited to water, air, noise, stormwater management, wildlife, vegetation, wetlands, and the natural functioning of the environment. When the store was open several years ago, the police responded to several incidents due to people congregating in the vicinity of the store. The noise and traffic of these incidents adversely impacted the neighborhood. The Commission foresees no adverse impact on the natural environment. 970213 -7 Minutes of Regular Meeting - February 13, 1997 5. Demonstrated Community Need. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment addresses a demonstrated community need as evidenced in the case of a substantive amendment by an advisory referendum vote of the electors. There is no need for additional Mixed Use property as demonstrated by the vacant property across the street classified as Mixed Use. There is no need for additional Mixed Use property; however, there is a need in this segment of the community for a convenience store. It is not allowed in a Neighborhood Conservation District, but the subject property is very close (thirty feet) to a Mixed Use District. The existing property will not develop as a single - family structure in the future if left as Neighborhood Conservation. 6. Logical and Orderly Development Pattern. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in a logical development pattern and not constitute spot zoning. Denying the reclassification request will affirm the development pattern approved by council when the district lines were drawn and will eliminate a reclassification that could set a precedent for future decisions. The amendment would not constitute spot zoning and would result in a logical and orderly development pattern. The amendment would extend an existing Mixed Use District to encompass this site. Council Member Hinds moved to adopt the ordinance. Council Member Escontrias seconded the motion. Council Member Benavides commented that since there was no convenience store in the area, the neighborhood would benefit. She also pointed out that the residents in the area were not protesting the change. Council Member Byford stated that even if the present owner did not sell alcohol, some future owner might. Council Member Escontrias emphasized that even though he seconded the motion, he was concerned that changing the classification would set a precedent for the future. Council Member Pruett felt that the property would become an eyesore if it was not renovated as a store. Council Member DonCarlos said that he did not believe the property met the criteria required and that the purpose of zoning was to secure the residential areas. The vote follows: 970213 -8 Minutes of Regular Meeting - February 13, 1997 Ayes: Council Members Benavides and Pruett Nays: Council Members Byford, Escontrias, Hinds, and DonCarlos Mayor Alfaro Consider Proposed Resolution No. 1300, Endorsing the Test Project for Reforestation and Visual Enhancements Project at the Central Wastewater Treatment Plant with the Texas Forest Service Public Outreach Grant Program The proposed resolution authorizes the City Manager to execute a contract with the Texas Forest Service. The Baytown Rotary Club has donated $5,000 toward this project and labor to plant the trees at the Central District Plant. The project is designed to screen the plant from Highway 146 and the Phase II Goose Creek Stream Park that will be located across the creek from the plant. The planting has been accomplished, but the resolution is required as part of the grant process. Council Member Hinds moved to adopt the resolution. Council Member Benavides seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council Members Benavides, Byford, Escontrias, Hinds, DonCarlos, and Pruett Mayor Alfaro Nays: None RESOLUTION NO. 1300 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE APPROPRIATE REPRESENTATIVE TO EXECUTE AGREEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE "URBAN FORESTRY PUBLIC OUTREACH GRANT PROGRAM" OF THE TEXAS FOREST SERVICE REQUEST AND COMMITTING SHARED COST OF THE PROJECT AS DESCRIBED IN THE GRANT APPLICATION; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF. 970213 -9 Minutes of Regular Meeting - February 13, 1997 Consent Agenda The Council considered the consent agenda items "a" through "j." a. Proposed Resolution No. 1301, authorizes the City Manager to apply for a federal grant in the amount of $283,882 from the Office of National Drug Control Policy in conjunction with the Houston High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area Grant Program. The money awarded will continue to pay the administrative and operational costs of the Director of the Houston HIDTA for the period 1 -1 -97 to 12- 31 -97. Council approved the Professional Services Agreement between the City and Director Stanley Furce in September 1996. The Director and the Executive Committee are responsible for the systematic approach to regional drug law enforcement in the Houston and Galveston area. The City is the managing agent for the federal grant and we have received this grant since October of 1995. There are no City funds included. We recommend approval. b. Proposed Ordinance No. 970213 -4, authorizes an industrial district agreement with First Chemical Company, L.P. for a seven -year period. This is the first industrial agreement with First Chemical Company, as the company has not yet started construction of its manufacturing facility which will be located within Industrial District No. 3 on property leased from Bayer Corporation. The facility will have an estimated value of $40,000,000. It is projected that nineteen permanent jobs and four contract jobs will be created as a result of the construction and operation of the facility. We recommend approval. C. Proposed Ordinance No. 970213 -5, approves a contract with Thos. Y. Pickett & Company, Inc. for Baytown Industrial District appraisals in the amount of $22,000. The City contracts with Thos. Y. Pickett to provide the valuations of properties for the City's industrial districts and general advice on planning and on the impact of any pollution control exemptions granted by TNRCC. This contract has increased $2,000 due to the increased number of entities and the tracking of pollution exemptions and is for the calendar year beginning January 1, 1997. We recommend approval. 970213 -10 Minutes of Regular Meeting - February 13, 1997 d. Proposed Ordinance No. 970213 -6, awards the bid for renovation of the Roseland Park Boat Ramp Project and the related parking lot to D & W Construction Company in the amount of $282,968.65. We received five bids. The construction plans involve renovating the existing ramps, new access points to the ramps, an asphalt overlay of the parking area near the ramps, and additional lighting. The ramps will be out of service during the months of March and April, and the project should be complete by May 1. Our consultants, Busch, Hutchison & Associates, have reviewed the bids and recommend approval. Funds in the amount of $82,968.65 will come from the 1991 Parks Bond program and a $200,000 grant from the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. We recommend approval. e. Proposed Ordinance No. 970213 -7, awards the housing rehabilitation contract for 3314 Michigan to Investment Group, Inc. in the amount of $17,090. Six bid packages were picked up and three were returned. Rehabilitation includes installing sheetrock, exterior doors, an attic stairway, floorcoverings, electrical, and plumbing systems, and an HVAC unit. The office estimate was $20,092.79. We recommend approval. f. Proposed Ordinance No. 970213 -8, awards the housing rehabilitation contract for 207 Hines to Colts Development in the amount of $19,661. Six bid packages were picked up and three were returned. Rehabilitation includes demolishing and reconstructing a bedroom, installing sheetrock, repairing kitchen cabinets, demolishing the front porch, rebuilding deck, foundation repair, installing new plumbing and electrical systems, an HVAC unit and a new roof. The office estimate was $20,946.91. We recommend approval g. Proposed Ordinance No. 970213 -9, awards the bid for a 2 Y2 ton utility truck with a 20 foot flatbed body from H -GAC in the amount of $39,563.17. The truck will be used by the Public Works Drainage Division. We recommend approval. 970213 -11 Minutes of Regular Meeting - February 13, 1997 h. Proposed Ordinance No. 970213 -10, awards the annual photographic supplies contract to The Keepsake in the amount of $23,021. Invitations to Bid were mailed to four suppliers and we received three bids. This contract is used by various departments. We recommend approval. Proposed Ordinance No. 970213 -11, awards the annual ammunition contract for the Police Department as follows: Items 1, 2 & 3 G T Distributors $ 4,044.96 Items 4 & 5 Texas State Distributors 24.400.00 TOTAL $28,444.96 We recommend approval. j. Proposed Ordinance No. 970213 -12, awards the bid for removal and replacement of the roof at the City Hall Annex to American Roofing Company in the amount of $89,400. Invitations to Bid were mailed to five suppliers and we received two bids and one no- bid. Two bids were sent back because the bid bond was not submitted with the bids. Funds for this project are included under the 1991 Bond Program. We recommend approval. Council Member Escontrias moved to approve the consent agenda items "a" through "j." Council Member DonCarlos seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council Members Benavides, Byford, Escontrias, Hinds, DonCarlos, and Pruett Mayor Alfaro Nays: None 970213 -12 Minutes of Regular Meeting - February 13, 1997 RESOLUTION NO. 1301 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS, TO MAKE APPLICATION TO THE OFFICE OF NATIONAL DRUG CONTROL POLICY FOR A GRANT IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE HIGH INTENSITY DRUG TRAFFICKING AREA PROJECT; DESIGNATING AN AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE; AUTHORIZING THE REPRESENTATIVE TO ACCEPT OR AFFIRM ANY GRANT AWARD THAT MAY RESULT THEREFROM; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF. ORDINANCE NO. 7894 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST TO AN INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT AGREEMENT WITH FIRST CHEMICAL COMPANY, L.P.; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF. ORDINANCE NO. 7895 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST TO AN INDUSTRIAL APPRAISAL SERVICES CONTRACT WITH THOS. Y. PICKETT & COMPANY, INC.; AUTHORIZING PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, THE SUM OF TWENTY -TWO THOUSAND AND NO1100 DOLLARS ($22,000.00); MAKING OTHER PROVISIONS RELATED THERETO; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF. ORDINANCE NO. 7896 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AND ATTEST TO A CONTRACT WITH D &W CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR THE RENOVATION OF THE BOAT RAMPS AND RELATED PARKING LOT AT ROSELAND PARK; AUTHORIZING PAYMENT OF THE SUM OF TWO HUNDRED EIGHTY -TWO THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED SIXTY -EIGHT AND 651100 DOLLARS ($282,968.65); MAKING OTHER PROVISIONS RELATED THERETO; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF. 970213 -13 Minutes of Regular Meeting - February 13, 1997 ORDINANCE NO. 7897 AN ORDINANCE AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT NO. 97 -01 TO INVESTMENT GROUP, INC., FOR THE SUM OF SEVENTEEN THOUSAND NINETY AND NO /100 DOLLARS ($17,090.00); AUTHORIZING PAYMENT THEREOF; MAKING OTHER PROVISIONS RELATED THERETO; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF. ORDINANCE NO. 7898 AN ORDINANCE AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT NO. 97 -02 TO COLTS DEVELOPMENT FOR THE SUM OF NINETEEN THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED SIXTY -ONE AND NO1100 DOLLARS ($19,661.00); AUTHORIZING PAYMENT THEREOF; MAKING OTHER PROVISIONS RELATED THERETO; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF. ORDINANCE NO. 7899 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT OF THIRTY -NINE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED SIXTY -THREE AND 171100 DOLLARS ($39,563.17) TO HOUSTON- GALVESTON AREA COUNCIL FOR THE PURCHASE OF A TWO- AND - ONE -HALF (2- 1/2) TON UTILITY TRUCK WITH A FLATBED BODY; MAKING OTHER PROVISIONS RELATED THERETO; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF. ORDINANCE NO. 7900 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF THE KEEPSAKE FOR THE ANNUAL PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZING PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, THE SUM OF TWENTY -THREE THOUSAND TWENTY -ONE AND NO1100 DOLLARS ($23,021.00); MAKING OTHER PROVISIONS RELATED THERETO; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF. 970213 -14 Minutes of Regular Meeting - February 13, 1997 ORDINANCE NO. 7901 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BIDS OF G T DISTRIBUTORS, INC., AND TEXAS STATE DISTRIBUTORS FOR THE ANNUAL AMMUNITION CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZING PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, THE SUM OF TWENTY -EIGHT THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED FORTY -FOUR AND 961100 DOLLARS ($28,444.96); MAKING OTHER PROVISIONS RELATED THERETO; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF. ORDINANCE NO. 7902 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF AMERICAN ROOFING COMPANY FOR THE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF THE ROOF AT CITY HALL ANNEX AND AUTHORIZING PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, THE SUM OF EIGHTY -NINE THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED AND N01100 DOLLARS ($89,400.00); MAKING OTHER PROVISIONS RELATED THERETO; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF. Consider Proposed Resolution No. 1302, Designating the City of Baytown Representative and Alternate to the Houston - Galveston Area Council General Assembly Council Member DonCarlos moved to appoint Pete C. Alfaro as the Representative of the City of Baytown to the Board of Directors and the General Assembly of the Houston - Galveston Area Council for 1997 and E. Frank Hinds as Alternate. Council Member Byford seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council Members Benavides, Byford, Escontrias, Hinds, DonCarlos, and Pruett Mayor Alfaro Nays: None 970213 -15 Minutes of Regular Meeting - February 13, 1997 RESOLUTION NO. 1302 A RESOLUTION APPOINTING PETE C. ALFARO AS THE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE HOUSTON - GALVESTON AREA COUNCIL FOR THE YEAR 1997 AND E. FRANK HINDS AS ALTERNATE SHOULD PETE C. ALFARO BECOME INELIGIBLE OR RESIGN; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF. For bid tabulations, see Attachments "A" through "E." Consider Appointments to Baytown Area Community Long -Range Planning Commission Council will consider these appointments at a future meeting. Consider appointments to the Growth Management and Development Advisory Commission and the Baytown Zoning Commission Council will consider these appointments at a future meeting. Consider Appointments to Electrical Board Council will consider these appointments at a future meeting. Consider Appointments to Community Development Advisory Committee Council will consider these appointments at a future meeting. City Manager's Report Tax Incremental Financing Program Two meetings have been held with Goose Creek Consolidated Independent School District and Lee College. Hotel Study Team A report will be given on February 24 to the administration. 970213 -16 Minutes of Regular Meeting - February 13, 1997 Adjourn As there was no further business to be transacted, the meeting was adjourned. Eileen P. Hall, City Clerk PROPOSAL FOR ROSELAND PARK BOAT RAHP RENOVATIONS AND PARKING LOT ADDITION BID TABULATION B1D O d N BEAN CONSTRUCTION ANGEL BROTkERS L 0 CONSTRUCTION C C CARLTCN ITEM QUANTITIES UNIT BIO ITEM DESCRIPTION ANO UNIT PRICE BIO N0. 4IRITTEN IN 1JORD5 UNIT PRICE TOTAL UNIT PRICE TOTAL UNIT PRICE TOTAL UNIT PRICE TOTAL UNIT PRICE TOTAL 1. 1.8 Acre Clearing and Grubbing Construction Site, Complete in Place 52,550.00 4.590.00 (650.00 1.170.00 1.500.00 2,700.00 10.000.00 18.000.00 15.000.00 69.000.00 2. 150 S.Y, Remove Existing Concrete Boat Raps, C lete in Place 32.80 4.920.00 6.50 975.00 35.00 5.250.00 25.00 3.750.00 130.00 19.500.00 3. 600 S.Y, Remove a Portion of Existing Asphalt and Material. Complete in Place 4.65 2.790.00 1.45 1.170.00 6.00 3.600.00 5.00 J.000.00 10.00 6.000.00 4. All Lump Sum Ramp Excavation arsd Slope Preparation, Complete in Place 1J.600.D0 13,600.00 6.175.00 6,175.00 11,000.00 11.000.00 24,000.00 2a,000.00 32.000.00 32.000.00 5. 1.175 C.Y. Dredging and Spoil for Ramp Installation as Shown on Drawings. Complete in Place 18.45 21.678.75 15.60 18.330.00 17.00 19.975.00 23.00 2).025.00 9.00 10.575.00 6. All Lump Sum Spoil Storage Area Preparation and Spoil Placement. Including Dike and Shaplrtq, as Shown on Drawings. Complete in Place 6.350.00 6.350.00 7.150.00 7,150.00 7,000.00 7.000.00 7,000.00 T,OD0.00 6.000.00 6.000.GO 7. 650 L.Y. Excavation from New Parking Area. Complete in Place 9.40 6.435.00 4.55 2.957.50 8.00 5.200.00 15.00 9.750.00 b.00 J,900.00 8. 1.770 S.F. 6' Concrete Approach for Boat Ramps as Shown on Drawings, Complete in Place 2.55 4.513.50 4.55 8.053.50 4.30 7.611.00 6.50 11.505.00 1.00 12.390.00 9. 2.208 S.f. 7 1/2' Concrete Boat Ramp as Shown nn Drawings. Complete in Place ).45 16,449.60 5.66 12.497.26 8.25 18,216.00 10.00 22.080.00 9.00 19.812.00 10. 532 Gal. Cut Back Asphalt Tack Caat (0.10 gal. /S.Y.I. Complete in Place 2.00 1.064.00 2.80 1.489.60 1.25 665.00 2.00 1.064.00 2.50 1.330.00 11. 816 Ton Class D 1C�1AC for Constructing Parking Lot. Complete in Place 43.10 35.169.60 50.20 40.463.20 45.00 36.720.00 41.00 33.456.00 44.00 35.904.00 12. 1.142 Gal. MC30 Prime Coat for Parking Lot Construction (0.25 - 0.35 gal. /S.Y.). C lete in Place 1.85 2.112.70 2.40 2.740.00 1.50 1.113.00 1.SD 1.113.00 2.20 2.512.40 Page 1 of 4 PROPOSAL FOR ROSELAND PARK BOAT RAND RENOVATIONS ANO PARKING LOT ADDITION BID TABULATION slo D E N BEAR CONSTRUCTION ANGEL BROTHERS L D CONSTRUCTION C C WiLTON ITEM QUANTITIES UN17 BID ITEM OESLRIPT[ON AND UNIT PRICE BID N0. wRl1TEH [N 1JORD5 UNIT PRICE TOTAL UNIT PRICE TOTAL UNiT PRICE i'OTAL UNiT PRICE TOTAL UNIT PRICE TOTAL 13. 1.060 Ton Crushed Limestone for Base, Complete in Place 19.85 21.041.00 22.75 24.115.00 28.50 30.210.00 23.00 24.380.00 22.00 23.320.00 14. 87 Ton Lime Slurry for Subgrade. Complete in Place 111.50 9.7D0.50 110.00 9.570.00 85.00 7.395.00 100.00 8.100.00 100.00 8.700.00 15. 4,567 S.Y. Mixlrtg and Canpacting b' Lime Stabilized Subgrade. 24 Ib. /S.Y.. Complete in Place 1.25 5.708.75 2.60 11.874.20 1.50 6.850.50 2.00 9.134.00 4.00 18.2b8.00 16. All lump Sum Electrical far Boat Ramp and Parking Area, including Hiring, Conduct. light Fixtures and Standards. Complete 1n Place 18.270.00 18.270.00 20.000.00 20.000.00 15.000.00 15.000.00 18.000.00 18.000.00 17.400.00 17.000.00 17. 50 L.f. 6' Handicapped Pier with Toe Ratl as Shawn an Drawings. Complete in Place 192.20 9.610.00 325.00 16.250.00 200.00 10.000.00 1)5.00 8.750.00 215.00 13.750.00 18. 50 L.f. 4' Launching Pier Between Boat Ramps as Shown an Drawings. Conglete in Place 167.50 8.315.00 227.50 11.375.00 160.00 8.000.00 200.00 10.000.00 160.00 8.000.00 19. 50 L.F. 4' Launching Pier as Shawn on Orawirtgs. Complete in Place 142.00 7.100.00 227.50 11.375.00 140.00 7.000.00 160.00 8.000.00 230.00 11.500.00 20. 133 L.f. 6' Courtesy Pier as Shown an Drawings. Complete in Place 138.00 18.354.00 280.00 37.240.00 140.00 18.620.00 170.00 22.6!0.00 250.00 33.250.00 21. 203 L.F. Hood Bulkheading as Shown an the Drawings. Complete in Place 257.00 52.171.00 162.50 32.987.50 300.00 60.900.00 205.00 41.b15.00 200.OD 40.600.00 22. 2,835 S.F. Stri in Parki lot. Complete in Place 0.95 2.693.25 0.65 1.842.75 0.50 1.411.50 2.00 5.610.00 1.D0 2.835.00 23. All Lump Sum Signage as Required by Grant and Shown an Drawings. Complete in Place 987.00 987.00 4.550.00 4.550.00 2.500.00 2.5D0.00 3.OD0.00 3.000.00 2.000.00 2.000.00 24. 310 L.F. Galvanized Steel Beam Guard Fence. Gf (TD1- -750 MOD per State Dept. Of Highways and Public Transportation, inCiudi End Flares. C fete in Place 18.00 6.660.00 23.10 8.547.00 21.00 7.770.00 15.00 5.550.00 16.00 5.920.00 Page 2 of 4 PROPOSAL FOR ROSELAND PARK BOAT RAMP RENOVATIONS AND PARKING LOT ADDITION BID TABULATION BID 0 8 w BEJW CONSTRUCTION ANGEL BROTHERS L D CONSTRUCTION C G CARLTON ITEH QUANTITIES UN1T BID ITEM DESCRIPTION AND UNIT PRICE B[D N0. isR[TTEN [N NORDS UNIT PRICE TOTAL UNIT PRICE TOTAL UNIT PRICE TOTAI. UNIT PRICE TDTAL UNIT PRICE TOTAL 25. 25 Tan Base failure Repair wfth Black Base Asphalt fOr Repair Of Existing Asphalt Paving Base Failure as Determined by Contractor and Approved by Engineer. Complete in Place 105.00 2.625.00 58.50 1.462.50 75.00 1.875.00 200.00 5.000.00 120.00 3.000.00 TOTAL BASE BID 5282.468.65 1294.860.03 5297.188.00 5332.752.00 5347.126.40 Page 3 of 4 d un m 0 A Q O 0 H m .D m Q cp �a --1 O Z H Q -1 O a. Qz cps 7 v y 4p N y O O z N O p N= 7 b y 10n M b D W o O N M e+ b cx r 10 r r r rbf 7 n b_ 2 y a- o ny mxv n8y m o n arm o np �� y eo D �D N rp m va A A vyh N m z m N N G� 7 �'_ � '_ �CA b~ gas b aas �:a91 A N n L b b N b �DD 0 0 �c /o r �p pro d o app � f'f N ryo a f1 N rv�p G IR N n o n x mrxx oxx y CL rn ,a 0 N O b 0 0 o v�az b n p CL m n p n my � �e o o o. s N O O O C p p p y H G n n f R w b (n o �' n -4 m e+ b Ln O N (A O, O to 6 O� (Nl1 O Z N 10 N O O 0 0 � m CL m n m n rnn=i 0 0 0 a n 06 r p o m n p a A � J O O O p p p yy O y V n n n n A C 2 l'7 o 0 o n i rn a N G V ip i7 O O O Q O 0 H m .D m Q cp �a --1 O Z H Q -1 O a. Qz N O v w N hJ �D. Y W 0 0 0 Y �ro Y N Y 0 Attachment "B" ro 0 o n Y HH d >HH F3 tj F3 H 0 u; l J H a O bd ro H ro phi 0 C � 'o H n lFn 0 N z rww Y �ro Y N Y 0 t1i H ro 0 o n Y HH 0 H u; H a O bd ro � 'o rrr rl N z 7 ro H n t1i H ro Y 0 H u; � rrr 0 (D 0 rr J i 0 N W w Y A r• w h H H H 0 z ro 0 m 0 ro H n ro H 0 m Y Y A Fl- Ln 0 co Y rD cn >HHH HtjH M ., r 11 rlt L `+ 7 O N y m r• I I r• rr a 0 w() H dF3 HO a4 �td r> Hy HO 0� zz slh /c /9711 -17 TABULATION ANNUAL PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES CONTRACT Page 1 of 4 CITY OF BAYTOWN BID TABULATION TITLE ANNUAL PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES CONTRACT BID #: 9711 -17 DATE JANUARY 7,1997 2:00 P.M. 1 /2�' "' CAMERAS ETC. SOUTHWESTERN THE KEEPSAKE; ; ��- •.���', ITEM QTY. UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE EXT.PRICE UNIT PRICE EXT.PRICE :UNIT:PRICE EXT.PRICE 1. FILM (ITEMS #1 -27) :,�- �.;�:+ i�.;c,r. `{ : .;r'�.� � - -= `; 1. 20 rolls Size 135, Black and White 3.03 60.60 3.29 65.80 �' ��: a�� :�:�3.00 � � : :. '�.+ 60.00 TMY- 135 -24, T -MAX 400 Kodak Kodak Kodak - : ;" �: �•: � . ... , ... . 2. 20 rolls Size 135, Black and White 2.93 58.60 3.15 63.00 •- ' ' 2.75 '55.00 ASA 100, Kodak TMX- 135 -24 Kodak Kodak Kodak " � : � • . T -MAX 100 .. :., •, . '.::. � , 3. 20 rolls Size 135, Black and White 4.99 99.80 5.35 107.00 . =-'- •:.�.• -: 4.75 • . : -', 95.00 TMX- 135 -36, T -MAX 3200 Kodak Kodak Kodak', �• �; .::_� -;. ;:�•;;, �. 4. 30 rolls Size 135, Color Print, ASA 100 -12 2.35 70.50 2.60 78.00 =�:•�. �,,- ;•2.20. • • �,'- :66.00 Kodak or Fuji 135 Fuji Fuji Fuji 1?: ° -' =:� • � : ,, -:��:� ,. ,, ,„ 5. 20 rolls Size 135, Color Print, ASA 100 -24 2.99 59.80 3.49 69.80 ��'':�:'� ;,2.75 ,-_c-:•;55.00' Kodak or Fuji 135 Fuji Fuji Fuji:',.'• - ' � •''•'�•. �.�, r;:.. � . 6. 250 rolls Size 135, Color Print, ASA 200 -12 2.79 697.50 2.89 722.50 .��';.`:.:•;, :- 2.60 ': 650.00 Kodak or Fuji 135 Fuji Fuji . . ♦ Fuji.��• ° ' � J• J 1 � :�:�,:� �� ~� w 7. : 250 rolls Size 135, Color Print, ASA 200 -24 3.69 922.50 3.79 947.50 �;���- :r.��;.3.00.• : >:r•:�,�:750.00� Kodak or Fuji 135 Fuji Fu i Fu i`� "�y:' � '�t i ' �t��,• +'�� +''' •'i ,..�.� ; }':��i�il'� ?� fro(• ' -' a�+Y ,!'��f'��'R'.�i�' 8. 200 rolls Size 135, Color Print, ASA 400 -12 2.99 598.00 3.15 630.00 �' �Pr;�:�2:80: t�;��';�t.560:00' Kodak or Fuji 135 Fuji Fuji Fuji °��£,��.���� 3 : ?;y�,�;- t��;�:�:f�: ��.�•�I�4�N: 9. 200 rolls Size 135, Color Print, ASA 400 -24 3.89 778.00 3.95 790.00 :;"3.90' t��`�1•�';7.80:00: 1 /2�' "' slh /c /9711 -17 TABULATION ANNUAL PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES CONTRACT Page 2 of 4 CITY OF BAYTOWN BID TABULATION TITLE ANNUAL PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES CONTRACT BID #: 9711 -17 DATE JANUARY 7,1997 2:00 P.M. 1 /27. ^' CAMERAS ETC. SOUTHWESTERN THE KEEPSAKE' ;; .. ITEM QTY. UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE EXT.PRICE UNIT PRICE EXT.PRICE UNIT;PRICE EXT.PRICE Kodak or Fuji 135 Fuji Fuji Fuji - .. '' . .�. . , a.>,:.: -. :�; 10. deleted rolls Discontinued /Deleted 11. 20 rolls Size 135, Color Slide, ASA 200 -24 5.79 115.80 6.29 125.80 "''a >r: � 5.75' •��?115.00 Kodak ektachrome slide of Fuji chrom Fuji Fuji Fuji +• �: r' Ektachrome 12. 20 rolls Size 135, Color, ASA 400 -24 6.99 139.80 7.59 151.80 '� 7.10 �� 142.00 Kodak ektachrome or Fuji chrome Fuji Fuji Fuji .:.: � -+ , .. 13. 20 rolls Ektachrome 64 94.34 1,886.80 93.39 1,867.80 � '.�:. `; :86.25 .: • 1,725.00 Professional #5017 Kodak Kodak Kodak �.; •��� •� ��••"• � •' ' � 1 ! . . 100 foot roll 35mm slide ; ,• :; � : � �. • �.rl • •• � -ti r .1 • 14. 20 rolls Kodak High speed 8.79 175.80 8.70 174.00 I 7:45 '' ; -149.00 infrared, type HIE - 135 -36 Kodak Kodak Kodak :- : ••: :• �� 't'. . 15. deleted rolls Kodak versicolor III 120 roll film t e VPS -120 � - -�� - ij . 16. deleted boxes Kodak T Max 100 (Catalog #8020737 Black &White, 4x5 sheet film, ,;:ti"i� =�f ;:• --•_� .:r .Y�r�T -. • 25 sheets to a box , :-• •,�•� ?� ,:. '� ,•, �. ,,.,�,:_- 17. deleted boxes Kodak high speed infrared, 4143, Black 8� white, 4x5 sheet film, - -�•�' - � ^� °••••• •• �•�^• 1 /27. ^' slh /c /9711 -17 TABULATION ANNUAL PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES CONTRACT Page 3 of 4 CITY OF BAYTOWN BID TABULATION TITLE ANNUAL PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES CONTRACT BID #: 9711 -17 DATE JANUARY 7,1997 2:00 P.M. 1/27 CAMERAS ETC. SOUTHWESTERN THE KEEPSAKE;';�:;•� �',;:,�,::, ITEM QTY. UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE EXT.PRICE UNIT PRICE EXT.PRICE UNIT -PRICE ;EXT:PRICE.� 25 sheets to a box .. +:•� -�• ° y.;r .i- .,...,� � , �•. %; • . • ��• � ,, 18. 12 boxes Polaroid type 51, Black &White, 41.35 496.20 43.75 525.00 � 40.00 .� 480.00 4x5 sheet, 20 per box Polaroid Polaroid Polaroid '� •f ►, :.: ��::•�.• �,; .; , 19. 12 boxes Polaroid type 52, Black 8� White, 36.75 441.00 40.15 481.80 -� ��,; 41.00: �•�: -� 492.00 4x5 sheet, 20 per box Poloroid Polaroid Polaroid ��'��.: �:�:�`�`1�:�;;:; . .. �•;-, - 20. 24 pkgs Polaroid type 55, Black 8 White 39.45 946.80 41.65 999.60 • �• �- � 40.00. -'��' 960.00 4x5 positive /negative, 20 per box Poloroid Polaroid Polaroid �•r�� � :�•,,-:.' -�_��. �• - s} � �' •.• 21. 12 boxes Polaroid type 59, Color, 58.29 fi99.48 61.75 741.00 •�-:'.:� �� 64.00 � :''� 768.00 4x5, 20 per box Poloroid Polaroid Poloaroid "; =� ••'� = -' - � �� � •'��� ��- •.4�'�f�'•. �. %. =2YC �t Via.. � ,. �.i:�. 22. 25 boxes Polaroid type 665, black 8� white, 9.90 247.50 10.45 261.25 � � �: ����� 10.00 ' :.•_•'_.: 250.00 positive /negative, 8 per pack Poloroid Polaroid Polaroid �- ; � �- ;� . .. 23. 60 pkgs Polaroid type 667, black 8� white, 18.35 1,101.00 20.05 1,203.00 -• • z -- 18.40 ,-;. -':1;104.00 8 per pack, twin packs Poloroid Polaroid Polaroid �• -• < � '•, :�• �' -'- -� - �•���. .�� ; _ , 24. 12 cases Polaroid type 669, color, 531.25 6,375.00 577.50 6,930.00 :• -,; ���:531.25• •: ;,, 6,375.00 16 per box, twin packs, 25 twin packs Poloroid Polaroid Polaroid ` �- . 'r = =• -� � � • per case �•� "~ • �� 33 , ...,.�..._ y�tr���� 25. 10 cases Polaroid type 600, color, 20 per pack, 640.50 6,405.00 720.00 7,200.00 t���;-;642.00� : �'::� 6;420.00 double packs Poloroid Polaroid Polaroid�.•.�:���_ �•i +:•a;:'�;� °-��:',� .1. .� :��': nr .�.. 26. 20 pkgs Polaroid type 559, color, 22.55 451.00 23.80 476.00 :: >,dK;�:r22.00:i�i�� }F440:00• 4 "x5" pack Poloroid Polaroid Polaroid; .'. _ .. , 1/27 sih/c/9711 -17 TABULATION ANNUAL PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES CONTRACT Page 4 of 4 TITLE ANNUAL PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES CONTRACT BID #: 9711 -17 DATE JANUARY 7,1997 2:00 P.M. CITY OF BAYTOWN BID TABULATION _� —_. ... ... - -.. � ....... ....... ... •Ja. •uuc wum CAMERAS ETC. - $25,351.73 deletion of chemicals from the annual contract. The quantities used last year were too small to be put on an annual contract. .Mailed 4 bids &received 3 bids. Jobar Scienlifc Company's bid was received by mail after Quantities for film remained the same as last year's bid. the bid opening deadline. There is a 5% decrease overall this year for the same items as last year due to competitiveness among suppliers. 1/27( L CAMERAS ETC. SOUTHWESTERN THE KEEPSAKE -• - ITEM QTY. UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE EXT.PRICE UNIT PRICE EXT.PRICE UNIT PRICE EXT.PRICE 27. 20 pkgs Polaroid type 552, black &while, 14.95 299.00 16.20 324.00 .: � 10.00 � 200.00 4 "x5" pack Poloroid Polaroid Polaroid � � - 28. 1D0 pkgs Advanced Photo Systems, speed 3.19 319.00 3.45 345.00 �- - 3.30 �� �: 330.00 200, 15 exposures. Kodak or Fuji Fuji Fuji Fuji acceptable. Ued by Fire Dept. - AWARDED TOTAL: 23,444.46 25,279.65 ;.� 29,021.00 ' ,� LOCATION: PASADENA, TEXAS HOUSTON, TEXAS BAYTOWN;.TEXAS;;St <;t�r.� LAST YEAR'S DELIVERY: 2 io 5 DAYS ARO 2 to 5 DAYS ARO 2 to'5 DAY5AR07Er•,F, -:i'- BID. There is a 7P decreasa fhic vnar in fhn aw�.�lod r..r�i i��r „ems. a.... .,. .�._ _� —_. ... ... - -.. � ....... ....... ... •Ja. •uuc wum CAMERAS ETC. - $25,351.73 deletion of chemicals from the annual contract. The quantities used last year were too small to be put on an annual contract. .Mailed 4 bids &received 3 bids. Jobar Scienlifc Company's bid was received by mail after Quantities for film remained the same as last year's bid. the bid opening deadline. There is a 5% decrease overall this year for the same items as last year due to competitiveness among suppliers. 1/27( L a� v 8 v �n d rr:c:LOTUS,97 -PAGE 1 9711 -11t CITY OF BAYTOWN BID TABULATION TITLE ANNUAL AMMUNITION CONTRACT BID #: 9711 -11 DATE JANUARY 23, 1997 2:00 P.M. BLACK HILLS AMMUN.. INC. G T DISTRIBUTORS. INC_ c;ui f= sreTF rnsr ITEM }UNIT QTY. (_ UNIT j DESCRIPTION I UNIT PRICE PRICE SHALL 8E FOR EACH 1,000 ROUNDS EXT. PRICE UNIT PRICE EXT. PRICE UNIT PRICE EXT. PRICE I I I 1 _ 4 _rounds Shotgun Ammunition - Buckshot ! 0.00 - NO BID ___347.84 1 391.36 NO BID � NO BID �IV11W X6124 I I i 2 2 rounds 1� Shotgun Ammunition -Slugs I 0.00 � NO BID 886.40 1 772.80 NO BID NO BID I_ ((SABOT � SLUG ONLY I wwV- SR_SH12 _( � (Sabot Slug j � _ I I I I I 3 6 _ rounds (Shotgun 1 Ammunition - Birdshot � 0.00 _ NO BID 146.8_0 880.80 VVI/V- AAH127.5 NO BID NO BID I –� I I 4 50 rounds Pistol Ammunition (180 grain 239.00 11 950.00 348.60 REINI0MMI3 17,430.00 NO BID NO BID BLACK HILLS D10N1 I 5 50 rounds Pistol Ammunition - (155 grain 249.00 12 450.00 0.00 NO BID NO BID NO BID _ � BLACK HILLS 1710N2 � 1 I _ (SUPPLY POINT: (RAPID CITY, SO. DAKOTA A_U_STIN, TX. MONTGOMERY,AL j DELIVERY: 30 DAYS ARO 30 DAYS ARO 30 DAYS ARO AWARDED TOTALS: ITEM #4 & 5 24,400.00 ITEM #1,2,3 � 4,044.96 TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $28,444.96 � � Mailed, GULF received 2 bids and 1 no -bid. 1 STATES 01ST. SUBMITTED A NO -BID. (COULD NOT COMPETE AGAINST JOBBER There , as a 2 %decrease this year over last year because LAST YEA�t'S BID_': the manufacturer decreased their ! UNIT PRICF] EXT. PRIC prices in order to be more competitive ' in the industry. ITEM QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION ! —I 1 4 rounds Shot un Ammunition - Buckshot 359.90 1,439.60 GT Distributors 2 2 rounds Shot un Ammunition - Slu s 872.24 1,744.48 GT Distributars 3 6 rounds Shot un Ammunition - Birdshot 132.70 796.20 GT Distributors 4 50 rounds Pistol Ammunition - 180 grain 243.80 12,190.00 GT Distributors 5 50 rounds Pistol Ammunition - 155 rain 258.00 12,900.00 Texas State Distributors I TOTAL: 29,070.28 02/05/97 w Attachment "E" 0 ou -4 Ej M -i r !t� rn -n 4 M M ;C 113 ;U 0 C: Co < > z -L —L 0 to ;u CD M 0 M 9 M z --I 0 n ;o 0 0 n 0 0 z z M x C13 Ei a] z 0 0 0 :E z M M C z z 0 C z 0 C z 0 G 0 n 0 0 0 z z 4 z 0 > -- I z X > 0 0 r- M 0 --1 0 r- 0 M I 0 > > z U) 0 0 > -4 > z Cn 0 M z 22 N ch z 2? -0 C6 r, Xr- M -0 -4 r- M x —1 0 0 X 0 6 z 0 0 ;o 0 6) z 0 0 -n 0 n z z X cn co 0 0 > > 0 C (33 Ei a) C z z �z z < Co C z M ;o U) 0 0 z M M CD > z M 0 X p z 0 �5 > 0 M ..x- M 0 M 1;0 o <X 4A 4A En 0 C D z M 0 in Co 00 M X �"n E5 -xi (J) G) A 0 CD 0 0 -Z 0 M cn cu 0 � o M C C13 FD a I z Co 0 z V) z r, p M z 0 -0 0 0 0 CD Cl O 0 N > in :z 3: Co z 0 M(J) ><:�M — —L M �C) :0 0 C) M :M (n C, M a) :z C > C M ;0:0 0 MA n "n M >< 03 M rn E5 X z 0 M M 0 ou -4 Ej M -i r !t� rn -n 4 M M ;C 113 ;U 0 C: Co < > z -L —L 0 to ;u CD M 0 M 9 M z --I 0 n ;o 0 0 n 0 0 z z M x C13 Ei a] z 0 0 0 :E z MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL SESSION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN February 13, 1997 The City Council of the City of Baytown, Texas, met in special session on February 13, 1997, at 6:00 p.m., in the John Tucker Lecture Hall, Lee College, with the following in attendance: Eva Benavides Council Member David Byford Council Member Manuel Escontrias Council Member E. Frank Hinds, Jr. Council Member Stephen DonCarlos Council Member Rolland J. Pruett Council Member Pete C. Alfaro Mayor Bobby Rountree City Manager Ignacio Ramirez City Attorney Eileen P. Hall City Clerk The meeting was opened with a quorum present after which Mayor Alfaro recessed into executive session pursuant to Section 551.071 of the Texas Government Code to discuss pending and contemplated litigation. When the open meeting reconvened, Mayor Alfaro announced that no action was necessary as a result of the executive session. Adjourn There being no further business to be transacted, the meeting was adjourned. Eileen P. Hall, City Clerk minutes101- 13 -97spc