The URL can be used to link to this page

1989 03 09 CC MinutesMINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN March 9, 1989 The City Council of the City of Baytown, Texas, met in regular session on Thursday, March 9, 1989, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the Baytown City Hall with the following attendance: Fred T. Philips Jimmy Johnson Perry Simmons Pete C. Alf aro Roy Fuller Rolland J. Pruett Emmett O. Hutto Fritz Lanham Randy Strong Bobby Rountree Eileen P. Hall Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Mayor City Manager City Attorney Assistant City Manager City Clerk The meeting was called to order with a quorum present. Councilman Simmons offered the invocation, after which the following business was conducted: Consider Minutes for the Regular Meeting Held February 23, 1989 Councilman Johnson moved for the approval of the minutes for the regular meeting held on February 23, 1989. Councilman Philips seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons Alf aro, Fuller and Pruett Mayor Hutto Nays: None W 890309 -2 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 9, 1989 Citizen's Communications a. Michael W. McClurg, 720 Gresham, will address council concerning the reinstatement of the four -way stop at Schilling and Pruett. Mr. McClurg stated that this was a very dangerous intersection, and urged council to reinstate the four - way stop at Schilling and Pruett. Council asked the administration to refer the matter to the Traffic Commission for reconsideration. b. Judy Hardy, 827 Briarcreek, will address council concerning the city government. Ms. Hardy expressed the feeling that council could have held an election on whether the citizens of Baytown favored the 5 -3 -1 Plan, but chose otherwise. Also, she stated that council's attitudes and actions have not constituted good government and that as the election draws nearer, she and her associates intend to speak to the citizens of the community about areas where council has been lax. Another area Ms. Hardy addressed was the selection of the auditor. She felt the selection did not represent an independent auditor. She pointed to the item on the agenda concerning waste collection and indicated that good government means people who are willing to go out and find ways to save money. She mentioned that Austin has a recycling program where in a matter of a few years, not only has waste collection stopped costing the taxpayers money, but it's beginning to make a profit. She felt that council should be concentrating on ways to save money. 890309 -3 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 9, 1989 Consider Proposed Ordinance, Amending Chapter 14, "Garbage, Trash and Brush" of the Code of Ordinances to Provide Refuse Collection At Certain Small Local Businesses It has been the policy of the City of Baytown for many years not to provide any type garbage service for any commercial enter- prise. A number of small businesses have contacted the adminis- tration requesting that the city consider contracting with them for their waste collection. These businesses in most cases do not generate enough waste to justify placement of a large container. Therefore, in some cases the waste products are carried home for disposal. The proposed ordinance change will allow the city to contract with certain small businesses for garbage service. The businesses would be eligible for garbage collection on the same days as residential customers but only paper or plastic bags would be allowed. The contract will specify the approximate quantity of bags to be disposed of weekly and the rate to be charged. The minimum charge shall be $20.00 per month and will vary depending on quantity. Contracts will be available only to those businesses who wish the service and who are located near existing residential customers. There are approximately 200 potential customers. The charge for this service will be included on the customer's utility bill. The administration recommended approval. In response to an inquiry from council, Mr. Lanham stated that the work generated by this proposal will be divided among the existing nine routes and will have very little impact since in almost every case, the city trucks are driving past the small businesses contracting for services. The foreman will be responsible for spot checking to see the number of bags that are being placed for collection. Councilman Philips moved for adoption of the ordinance; Councilman Pruett seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Fuller and Pruett Mayor Hutto Nays: None Abstained: Councilman Alf aro daziT a qpsd-tA@" P-1 -ielqsfiJ ptil-brismA p annanib-iQ nil ;:tDq!lo3 saij+sii a-bLvoIt9 of ;n.sr�osnib-O 3-a sjboJ sett +o, cleu-t-d aspi= aeniauri iGz)o_l ifism,:3 -ILI J f 'I I J I10 tri Cj I Cj I L V -7 I� n cl i j z, cl I d 1 1 J iL l q -ic', I iT fll _j, . 'it L A, 7 ij, 70 it) I.M I J I b-lo -f-IJ fil) i K') L;,i 0 f 4: iv': a -I t3 c: m "AliaL 890349 -4 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 9, 1989 Ordinance No. 5221 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 14, "GARBAGE, TRASH, AND BRUSH," BY ADDING ARTICLE VI, "SMALL BUSINESS REFUSE "; REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; CONTAINING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF. Councilman Alfaro requested that the administration provide council with a status report in three or four months. Mr. Lanham showed council photographs of city streets that have been damaged as a result of commercial refuse collection. In many cases, the large containers are placed just behind the curb and the vehicles are damaging the streets when the containers are picked up to be emptied. There have also been cases where the vehicles have backed or driven over the curb causing damage. Mr. Lanham suggested that an ordinance be prepared requiring the following: 1. A permit for a small fee; 2. Requirement that as part of the permit, the containers be placed off city right of way; 3. The refuse collector must have insurance to cover damages to public property. Council had no objections to the administration developing this ordinance. Consider Proposed Ordinance, Authorizing Change Order No. 1 to the Contract with H.B. Hamilton to Include Median Improvements In Front of the Post Office on Baker Road Ever since the post office opened there have been complaints about traffic problems within the parking area. One possibility to solve the problem, is to narrow the median on Baker Road in front of the post office and have the drop boxes there. Councilman Philips expressed concern that placing the drop boxes at that location would add to the traffic flow problem; Councilman Pruett concurred. Council agreed to table the item. IJ cJ I cl/l -isb-iD agrisdO pr; E :: E -iofi:�uA sonEnib-iO boaaqu-I'l nl eJrisfns3vo-iqml ripsibs-311 Ttbsjl:)nl oz no:tf_,n,;,H' rtJ-ivi Jns-i-Jrlt.:'j -,;I-1 br;,o'O -is lzfl no 9:)i+10 Jazo':: ort-i '(- I L 'Ll Ci ` :l V!L ;-i j _j -3 -1 e -7 _Ti. i 1- 1 t2 + 2 T' -)t t+ m j%*". r 1 b ?ii._ u j 'L -I 3 li t:) :2.: 1 'D I Cj 1-1 N cJ I cl/l -isb-iD agrisdO pr; E :: E -iofi:�uA sonEnib-iO boaaqu-I'l nl eJrisfns3vo-iqml ripsibs-311 Ttbsjl:)nl oz no:tf_,n,;,H' rtJ-ivi Jns-i-Jrlt.:'j -,;I-1 br;,o'O -is lzfl no 9:)i+10 Jazo':: ort-i '(- I L 'Ll Ci ` :l V!L ;-i j _j -3 -1 e -7 _Ti. i 1- 1 t2 + 2 T' -)t t+ m 890309 -5 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 9, 1989 Hold Public Hearing at 7:00 p.m. On Request By Houston Lighting & Power Company for Rate Increase Mayor Hutto open the public hearing and requested that all those present desiring to testify to register on the form provided outside the council chamber. He administered the oath to those present desiring to testify. Zane Wright, representing Houston Lighting & Power Company, stated that on November 23, the company had filed a rate increase amounting to $432,000,000 with the Public Utility Commission, as well as the cities served by the company. That increase was requested primarily to include in the rate base two generating stations which are currently complete and in commercial operation. Those include the Limestone Lignite Unit 1, located in Limestone County, Texas, and the South Texas Project Unit 1, located near Bay City, Texas. Both of these projects represent an investment to the company of $2,000,000,000. They also comprise a significant part of the company's fuel diversification program. As late as 1978, over 100% of the company's generating capacity used natural gas as a boiler fuel, but by 1990, and the completion of South Texas Project Unit 2 that reliance an natural gas will have been reduced to 30 %. It is important to note that well over 50% of the generating capacity of Houston Lighting and Power Company will use coal and nuclear as a boiler fuel. That becomes quite significant when you take into account the relative pricings of those fuels. The price of natural gas is approximately $1.96 per million BTU's, compared with the cost of nuclear at $ .49 per million BTU's. That is significant when you take into account that since the South Texas Project Unit 1 went into commercial operation in August, 1988, it has already saved our consumers over $10,000,000 in fuel costs. It is expected over the life of the project, including both Units 1 and 2, that it will save over $16,000,000,000. Fuel diversification has been an important component of HL &P's construction program since the earlier 70's, providing protection for customers against the radical swings in the cost of energy. These radical swings are reflected when you take into account the 1973 cost of natural gas at $ .30 per million BTU's, and you compare that with the 1983 peak of $4.70 per million BTU's. 890309 -6 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 9, 1989 The initial rate increase which is currently before council and under consideration represents a 15% system -wide average increase or 16.3% to the residential customers. To put that in perspective, an average customer who uses 1,000 kilowatt hours of energy can expect a rise in their bill of $13.00. Mr. Wright said that he felt it important to keep in mind that the price of electricity today is down. The average cost per kilowatt hour today is $ .075. Compare that to the 1983 peak, during the peak pricing of natural gas, at * .0825 per kilowatt hours. A quick comparison of 1,000 kilowatt hours of energy, September, 1982 compared with September, 1988, shows that the 1988 customers were paying $7.93 less for energy. Since the early 70's HL &P has been involved in an agressive construction program - -a fuel diversification effort where HL &P has systematically traded capital costs for fuel price stability. With the inclusion of the Limestone Lignite Unit 2 and the South Texas Project Unit 1 in the company's rate base, the company will not need to come before city council for many years. These two plants will consume the lowest costs energies available today providing on -going benefits to the customers of HL &P. Customers will benefit from price stability, service reliability and adequate capacity. Randy Strong, City Attorney, pointed out that the rate filing packet for HL &P is contained in the three boxes which he introduced as part of the hearing record. Councilman Johnson moved that the material be submitted; Councilman Alfaro seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Alf aro, Fuller Mayor Hutto Nays: None Philips, Johnson, Simmons, and Pruett Mr. Strong explained that in anticipation of the rate filing by Houston Lighting & Power, the City of Baytown joined with the City of Houston and a number of other cities in the Coalition of Cities with Original Jurisdiction, sometimes called the Houston Coalition. The purpose of this was to pool the resources, and in this case, primarily the resources of the City of Houston to be able to have rate experts to investigate, go through the filing and come up with recommendations as to the appropriateness of the increase requested by HL &P. The city has done this a number of times in the past. 890309 -7 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 9, 1989 One difference this year is that in order to get a broader participation in the decisions made by the coalition, there was actually a steering committee created which has been overseeing the conduct of the rate hearing and will continue to oversee the conduct of the appeal before the Public Utility Commission. As part of the coalition, the City of Baytown is a member of that steering committee, and Mr. Strong has been in attendance at all those meetings with representatives from other cities. The committee has not gone through and looked at all the documents in detail, but the committee did make the decisions as to hiring to review the rate case. There were experts hired outside the City of Houston staff to review some of the aspects of the case. The overall direction of the rate case has been determined by this committee; therefore, the City of Baytown has had input into these decisions. One of the major concerns that the steering committee had was to insure that all the cities engaged in responsible rate making. That is a very important factor because cities are given the duty and authority under the Public Utilities Regulatory Act to set fair and reasonable rate for the utilities such as Houston Lighting & Power Company. It is important that cities carry out this responsibility in a responsible manner. There have been some discussions or some efforts made to have all jurisdiction in rate cases given to the Public Utility Commission and remove that jurisdiction from local authorities. The steering committee believes that that would be a mistake. The committee also did not want, as a group of cities, to be making unsubstantiated recommendations or irresponsible recommen- dations to the various city councils as to this rate case, because the committee did not feel that the cities would want to be accused of engaging in irresponsible actions, and have that used against them at some other forum. The reason for that explanation was to lead into the most public and most pressing issue of the whole rate case - -the South Texas Nuclear Project. The committee in reviewing this received massive information. The questions over the South Texas Project are well known. There is a Public Utility Commission Docket assigned simply to investigate the prudency of some of the decisions that were made in the design, construction and overview of the South Texas Project. The Public Utility Commission has had that docket f or many many months. A lot of man hours have been spent on that. Im 890309 -8 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 9, 1989 The PUC has retained the firm of Ernst and Whinney to go through and make a report as to the prudency issues and to put some dollar figure onto what the prudent or imprudent acts may have been. They have been working on that for a number of months and will probably not have those numbers quantified until this summer. They have identified some areas where they say there are problems, but even they have not been able to put a dollar figure on those. With all that background, the committee felt that it would be irresponsible for the cities in a mere ninety (90) days, which is the maximum time that the committee has had, to review the docket to try to put a dollar figure on what was prudent or imprudent when it comes to the South Texas Project. Given the time and resources, the committee could do that, but under the statute, the committee does not have adequate time to make that review. With that in mind, the committee has recommended that as far as South Texas, the recommendation is that no increase be given, not because the whole thing is imprudent, but because in this forum, the dollar amounts cannot be determined. That will be decided before the PUC, and that decision will be roiled into all the rates at that time. Now, as to the remainder of the issues, the recommendation of the city experts is attached as "A" to the ordinance. The attorney presented Exhibit "A" for entry into the record. Councilman Philips moved that Exhibit "A" be included as part of the proceedings; Councilman Johnson seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Councilmembers Philips, Johnson, Simmons Alf aro, Fuller and Pruett Mayor Hutto Nays: None The city attorney mentioned some of the major adjustments made by the coalition that are being recommended for approval, for instance the Malakoff Generating Station. This was disallowed in total by the coalition because this plant, although planned, was never built. The company is requesting recovery of engineering costs and land expenses, and since this is not a plant that is used and useful at this time, the coalition did not feel it appropriate that it be included in the rate base. Im B90309-9 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 9, 1989 There were other reductions made for instance, concerning fuels, reconciling some of the expenses that the company used on fuel, wage and salary increases that were proposed by HL &P had been cut back because some of them are speculative. Some decreases were made in proposals by HL &P for employee benefits because inflation factors were applied which are not known and quantifiable. A number of other smaller items were adjusted. Things like adjustments to federal income tax which the coalition felt should be handled differently than HL &P is proposing which results in a savings to the rate payers. There are a number of factors like these that work into and reduce the overall rate base. The rate base is the overall value of HL &P in a simplistic sense. The other major change in what was proposed by HL &P comes in the rate of return area. Rate of return deals with how much would be a fair and reasonable amount for HL &P to earn on its investment in its utility plants. This rate of return is deter- mined by looking at the costs of capital of the company that has to sell bonds, that has stocks outstanding, etc. where it borrows money to finance its building programs and other things. One must go through a lot of accounting details to determine what rate of return would be appropriate to the company. When looking through the whole thing, when evaluating the company's cost of capital or the cost for them to borrow, the company had asked for the rate of return of 11.23% on overall investment. The experts for the cities have reviewed that, and they believe that is, in comparison with similar companies, on the high side and recommended a decrease in that amount to 10.48 %. Then, one must calculate the total rates by multiplying that rate of return times the rate base of the company. After going through all that, eliminating the South Texas Project and making those adjustments, there is a minor increase to the company of about 1% or $30,000,000, but when the increased cost of fuels is adjusted out, the increase is zeroed out. The result of all that is that the recommendation of the Coalition of Cities and what is contained in the ordinance is that no increase be granted to HL &P based on the filing before council. Councilman Alfaro stated that it was his understanding that the company was asking for 65% recovery of the South Texas Nuclear Plant 1, and inquired if one -half that amount were granted, what would that do to the rate of return, based on the rest of the adjustment? Im 890309 -10 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 9, 1989 Randy Strong responded that the addition of South Texas would not affect the rate of return, as far as that 10.48 %. That factor will remain the same, but you would be applying that to a larger rate base and that would increase their annual revenue. Councilman Alfaro also inquired if the city attorney had more information on the reason that HL &P is recommending an average in excess for non - coincidental peak versus probability of negative margin. The city attorney responded that he would not feel comfortable in attempting to explain why HL &P would want to make that change. For the benefit of the other council members and the audience, what Councilman Alfaro was addressing is any time that there is a rate increase, a second step to the program is once an increase is granted, the company must figure out which customers will pay for that increase. There are residential customers, large commercial customers, small commercial, miscel- laneous, general service, street lights, interruptible service, etc. The increases are applied to the different classes based on what demand that class places on HL &P as a whole because a class that requires more electricity or anticipates the use of more electricity, the company must build extra plants to account for that one class: therefore, that class should pay more of the overall costs. What Councilman Alfaro was discussing is that there are a couple of ways that one can determine what the appropriate demand of each class is. This NCP that he was discussing has been used for a number of years and approved by the PUC. In this docket, HL &P has requested a different method to calculate that demand and the committee is recommending that the old way continue to be used. Councilman Alfaro inquired of Mr. Wright what the reserve margin for HL &P is. Mr. Wright replied that it is expected with the completion of South Texas Unit 2, it will be somewhere around 36 %. Councilman Philips inquired if that was the company's excess generating capacity over and above demand. Mr. Wright replied in the affirmative. im B90309-11 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 9, 1989 Councilman Philips then inquired if the company was at liberty to sell that excess capacity to other areas. Mr. Wright responded that the Texas utilities are connected by what is called a utility grid which includes most of the utilities in the state. Should there be a short fall at any time, the utilities have the authority to move power among themselves. Councilman Philips acknowledged that he understood that process, and inquired if the revenue that would be acquired from selling that excess capacity would be credited back into the cost or does that get credited into the ratepayer calculations for HL &P's standard area? Mr. Wright responded that at some future point those revenues would be taken into account, but not in this case. The reason for that is that rate before council, $432,000,000 is actual based upon a 12 -month period where the company took a look at actual revenues and actual expenses and projected the opera- ting and maintenance expenses associated with the two generating plants. The bottom line figure then is a revenue deficiency which is reflected by the number before council. Councilman Philips stated that the proceeds from the sale of excess capacity should flow back into those economics that Mr. Wright was just discussing so that in effect there would be credits toward lowering HL &P maintenance costs. Councilman Philips felt that the customers are being asked to buy into HL &P's excess capacity with no credit coming back for what earning power that capacity has. Mayor Hutto asked if there any other questions. Councilman Alfaro said that by looking at the table presented to Council, if one looked at the method now used, the probability of negative margin, that would have about 1 /10th the increase on street and protective lighting and 1 /10th the increase in guard lighting so there is a significant increase in those two areas by changing the manner in which the rate is calculated. He noted that HL &P is required to have at least 20% reserve power. Mr. Wright stated that it is not a requirement, but an industry standard. Most utilities try to maintain somewhere between 20 and 25% spending reserve which is primarily for main- tenance purposes. Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 9, 1999 Councilman liberty to sell responded that called a utility state. Should have the authori B90309-11 Philips then inquired if the company was at that excess capacity to other areas. Mr. Wright the Texas utilities are connected by what is grid which includes most of the utilities in the there be a short fall at any time, the utilities ty to move power among themselves. Councilman Philips acknowledged that he understood that process, and inquired if the revenue that would be acquired from selling that excess capacity would be credited back into the cost or does that get credited into the ratepayer calculations for HL &P's standard area? Mr. Wright responded that at some future point those revenues would be taken into account, but not in this case. The reason for that is that rate before council, $432,000,000 is actual based upon a 12 -month period where the company took a look at actual revenues and actual expenses and projected the opera- ting and maintenance expenses associated with the two generating plants. The bottom line figure then is a revenue deficiency which is reflected by the number before council. Councilman Philips stated that the proceeds from the sale of excess capacity should flow back into those economics that Mr. Wright was just discussing so that in effect there would be credits toward lowering HL &P maintenance costs. Councilman Philips felt that the customers are being asked to buy into HL &P's excess capacity with no credit coming back for what earning power that capacity has. Mayor Hutto asked if there were any other questions. Councilman Alf aro said that by looking at the table presented to Council, if one looked at the method now used, the probability of negative margin, that would have about 1 /10th the increase on street and protective lighting and 1 /10th the increase in guard lighting so there is a significant increase in those two areas by changing the manner in which the rate is calculated. He noted that HL &P is required to have at least 20% reserve power. Mr. Wright stated that it is not a requirement, but an industry standard. Most utilities try to maintain somewhere between 20 and 25% spending reserve which is primarily for main- tenance purposes. 890309 -12 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 9, 1989 Councilman Alfaro stated that the assumption of no genera- tion from the South Texas Nuclear Plant is not the right assumption. He felt that the assumption must be that there will be generation from the South Texas Nuclear Plant with the cost of fuel being what it is, but in the absence of more precise data, what the cities are saying at this time is that they are going to go ahead and accept the Regulatory Affairs Division recommen- dation that this not be included at this time. Mayor Hutto entered for the record a letter from a constituent, Mrs. Booth, opposing any increase for Houston Lighting and Power. He continued that anyone desiring an oppor- tunity to testify has done so; therefore, he closed the public hearing. The city manager mentioned that the PUC has scheduled several hearings in Harris County and one of those will be in Baytown. At this time, no place, date or time for the hearings has been published. Consider Proposed Ordinance, Setting Rates to be Charged By Houston Lighting & Power For Electric Utility Service Within the Corporate Limits of the City of Baytown Randy Strong, City Attorney, stated that the recommendation of the Coalition of Cities is that no rate increase be granted to Houston Lighting & Power Company at this time. Adoption of the proposed ordinance would provide for no rate increase. Councilman Fuller moved for adoption of the ordinance; Councilman Philips seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Fuller and Pruett Mayor Hutto Nays: None Abstained: Councilman Alf aro Councilman Alf aro explained that he had abstained from voting because he felt adoption of the ordinance would be misleading. Even though the ordinance provides for no increase, the PUC will eventually rule that the company is due some recovery on the South Texas Nuclear Plant. I f J ?:711 L t�s r, I "t, C4 f Yai bapizdJ sd of asIA9 pni-IJ92 P s)onsn ib -10 buaoqu-i'-', - jF- b i ; : 'n -109 s!,.Jocl :t pn-cl.p--J -ir -;.JoH aril (I Iri-I 1W s-m -tv-vz)2 yj i I i:fu 71 i -I rTwc�Iv5L4 +0 1(-1 13 J i W1 890309 -13 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 9, 1989 The city attorney reminded council that council's action will only affect rates within the City of Baytown. The company has the right to appeal to the Public Utility Commission and has appealed rates established by other cities. Therefore, the company will probably appeal the rate set by Baytown. The PUC is engaged in a hearing at present for areas outside cities and usually establishes system -wide rates. When the appeal of the cities' rates and the rural rate case is finally heard, the PUC will also make a finding on the South Texas prudency question. At some point, the PUC will be able to quantify that portion of the South Texas Project that was prudent and that will be appro- priate to put into the rate base for recovery by the company. No one should be mislead. At some point, there should be some recovery to the company on that, but for Baytown's portion at this time, that decision cannot be made. Ordinance No. 5222 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO RATES TO BE CHARGED BY HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY FOR ELECTRIC UTILITY SERVICE WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS; CONTAINING FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS RELATED TO THE SUBJECT; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF INCONSISTENT PROVISIONS; CONTAINING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF. Consider Proposed Resolution No. 10439 Authorizing the Adminis- tration to Apply For Economic Development Administration Planning Grant Bobby Rountree, Assistant City Manager, stated that the primary objective of the grant is to provide for economic development assistance to those cities meeting certain distress factors. The grant assistance can be provided for up to 75 %; however, EDA looks more favorable on localities that provide more than a 25% match. Therefore, the administration is asking to apply for $60,000 with a $40,000 match. There are approximately six to eight grants of this nature approved annually for a five state region. This means that there are approximately 40 cities eligible to apply. The staff has met with Dr. Brister and the citizen's group interested in the future of Baytown. He has indicated that that group is willing to come up with a match if the grant is approved. 890309 -14 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 9, 1989 Councilman Fuller moved for adoption for the resolution. Councilman Johnson seconded the motion. The city manager noted, in response to an inquiry from council, that the citizen's group is not guaranteeing that they will not come before council and possibly other governmental entities for at least a portion of the funds. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Alfaro, Fuller and Pruett Mayor Hutto Nays: None Resolution No. 1443 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING APPLICATION TO THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINIS- TRATION FOR A GRANT AVAILABLE FROM THE STATE AND URBAN PLANNING PROGRAM OPERATED UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF SECTION 3O2(a) OF THE PUBLIC WORKS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1965, AS AMENDED, AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF. Consider Proposed Resolution No. 1044, Supporting Legislation Introduced in the Texas Legislature Related to Smoking in Public Places And /Or At Public Meetings Council has discussed the possibility of adoption of no smoking regulations at two previous meetings. The proposed resolution encourages the legislature to pass House Bill No. 458 also known as the Texas Smoke Free Act so that there will be statewide regulations prohibiting smoking in public places and at public meetings. Councilman Philips moved for adoption of the ordinance; Councilman Pruett seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons Alfaro, Fuller and Pruett Mayor Hutto Nays: None 890309 -15 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 9, 1989 In response to an inquiry from council, the city manager indicated that if this legislation is not adopted, the City of Baytown could always adopt an ordinance similar to the AMN legislation being proposed. Resolution No. 1044 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS, ENCOURAGING THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS TO ADOPT SMOKE - FREE INDOOR AIR ACT; DIRECTING THAT COPIES BE SENT TO APPROPRIATE LEGISLATORS; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF. Consider Plans and Specifications for 1988 Community Development Street Program and Authorize Advertisement For Bids The administration is proposing under the 1988 Community Development Street Program construction of Yupon Street and one short block of Miriam which intersects with Yupon. That block of Miriam is between Ash and Lee Drive. The estimated cost is $206,050. The administration is recommending that bids be taken for this work, but since there is $219,000 available for the 1988 Community Development Program, that as much work as possible be done on the two streets. The project would consist of 6 inch stabilized subgrade for the street. The water line would be replaced utilizing PVC pipe and would be placed behind the curb. Also, an underground storm drain would be provided. The proposal is to take bids on April 6 and allow 60 working days. The admin- istration requested approval of the plans and specifications and authorization to advertise for bids. Councilman Pruett moved to approve the plans and specifica- tions and authorized the administration to advertise for bids. Councilman Simmons seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Alf aro, Fuller and Pruett Mayor Hutto Nays: None 890309 -16 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 9, 1969 Consider Approval of Proposed 1989 Street Improvement Program The Engineering Department has surveyed the streets of Baytown and evaluated pavement conditions. The streets in need of maintenance were rated and cost estimates were prepared to make the necessary repairs and improvements. Almost $2,000,000 of street maintenance is needed at this time. That information is attached as Attachment "A." Attachment "B" represents a list of the streets that can be improved with the $200,000 that is available in the 1988 -89 budget. The city manager noted that several thoroughfares have been included on the proposed list -- Airhart, Danubina, and Texas Avenue. The proposed list also included a project on Baker Road which would not be included. The administration requested approval of the proposed 1988 -89 Street Improvement Program. Councilman Simmons moved for approval of the list as presented by the city manager. Councilman Pruett seconded the motion. Councilman Philips expressed his concern with the amount of money budgeted for street repairs. He stated that the immediate answer would be a bond program. However, every dollar in bonds cost $2.00 later on. Therefore, he realized that bonds would not be the total answer. Mr. Lanham pointed out that at one time the City of Baytown was spending about $800,000 a year on streets. However, at that time the city was receiving Revenue Sharing funds. Now, there are only budgeted funds available. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Alfaro, Fuller and Pruett Mayor Hutto Nays: None Consider Approval of the Street Lighting Plan For West Baker Road Between Decker Drive and Bayway Drive Houston Lighting & Power has proposed twenty -two 50,000 lumen high pressure sodium vapor street lights on existing wooden poles for the improved section of West Baker Road between Decker ,- , - ms-jpOjq jnqfl,qvO-jqmj Igs-Ijp �a?j bqaOqj3-jq +0 1 qq,-. -I G\,.- -Isi, - 3 1 1 1 d b t:�, Cl S J c. A il L if; ::rs Z I A r_-'•irfi (_) Feral 0 !D d b t:�, Cl S J c. A il L if; ::rs Z I A il f -t iv .7; i ..)-B Cicj •*-, r; t a.-,oq -tsAaa JaqW -to--1 nslq pni-frlgi-1 lss-i-12 -arl-I 'To irvci-lqqA -i"' I F�Fff;C)Zj I-MIS 9Vi-ICA -1e,1:1941 S j-; 890309 -17 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 9, 1989 Drive and Bayway Drive. There are three 3,300 lumen mercury vapor lights that would be changed to sodium vapor. These are included in the total 22. The cost would be $3,300 per year. (on, The administration recommended approval of the street lighting plan. Councilman Fuller moved to approve the street lighting plan for West Baker Road between Decker Drive and Bayway Drive. Councilman Alf aro seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Alf aro, Fuller and Pruett Mayor Hutto Nays: None Consent Agenda Council considered the Consent Agenda as follows: a. Proposed Ordinance No. 890309 -4, awards the bid for industrial tractors to Brookside Equipment Sales in the amount of $23,622.08. The two low bids received from B & F Farm Equipment and Northgate Outdoor Power & Tractor do not meet specifi- cations. Invitations to bid were mailed to 15 vendors and we received proposals from 11 vendors and two no bids. We recommend approval. b. Proposed Ordinance No. 890309 -5, awards the bid for fence repairs at the Gray Sports Complex to Union Fence Company in the amount of $9,689.82. Invitations to bid were sent to five vendors and we received three bids. We recommend approval. 890309 -18 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 9, 1989 C. Proposed Ordinance No. 890309 -6, awards the demolition contract for 1130 Cherry to Daniels Dump Truck Hauling in the amount of $5,900. This demolition bid was rebid because the low bidder, Mr. Uranus Palton, could not perform the work. Enclosed is a letter from Mr. Palton withdrawing his bid. Mr. Palton has removed the structure but has found that he does not have the equipment to remove the slab. We recommend approval. d. Proposed Ordinance No. 890309 -7, authorizes Change Order No. 4 to the 1988 Sanitary Sewer Sliplining Contract. The eight inch sewer line in the easement parallel to St. Andrews and Country Club View between Quail Hollow Drive and Country Club Drive has deteriorated to the extent that several cave -ins are present in the yards and sewer service has been inter- rupted by stoppage. Public Works crews have been unstopping the line on an almost daily basis for nearly two weeks and have dug up the line at one stoppage point. The hole has been left open and shored in order to maintain flow. Repairs cannot be made at this point due to the deteriorated sewer pipe. Funds are available in the sewer bond account to pay the $15,890 cost. We recommend approval. e. Sugar Land Rehab, Inc. has completed the original sliplining contract as well as Change Orders 1, 2 and 3. Ten percent ($13,581.25) of the original contract plus Change Orders 1, 2 and 3 have been withheld from Sugar Land's payments. Since all the work has been satisfac- torily completed, we recommend that the retainage be reduced to 5%. We recommend approval. 890309 -19 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 9, 1989 f. Proposed Ordinance No. 890309 -8, will renew the contract with Harris County which provides for a cooperative program of bookmobile service for the aged and the deprived within the city limits and in certain unincorporated areas of Harris County. This contract is the instrument which sets forth Harris County's agreement to contribute $27,291 toward a shared bookmobile program. The funds are used to pay the salaries of personnel which serve readers both inside and outside the city limits. We recommend approval. g. The Statistical Data Analysis Grant is in the final fifth year of funding. The grant provides for a computer clerk and equipment which provides information to the 24 area Neighborhood Watch programs with approx- imately 740 block captains. The grant allows for data analysis and dissemination of information relative to the Watch areas as well as the Police Department. A bi- monthly newsletter is published apprising block captains of criminal action being committed in their area. The program has initiated the "Safe House" Program which provides the area children a safe harbor should the need arise. The SDAS unit is currently mapping the entire city to further assist in pinpointing areas which are in need of police intervention. The state provides $5,976, and the city provides $22,909, making the total amount of the grant $28,885. We recommend approval. h. The Youth and Law Grant provides a police officer who performs as a liaison officer between the schools and the Police Department. This officer provides assistance to students and faculty relative to drug and alcohol problems and thefts. The target population is 16,000 students in the school district. Faculty members are able to call on this officer for updates on statistics and recommendations involving their students. 890309 -20 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 9, 1989 The officer assigned makes 12 presentations to teachers, 504 crime prevention presentations to the students, and 126 informal counseling sessions. These presentations along with increased visibility should reduce theft and drug sales in and near our schools. Approximately 60 students will be assisted in obtaining treatment for alcohol and drug abuse problems. The state provides $8,015; the city $30,520; making a total of $38,535. We recommend approval. i. Mr. James K. Clift has requested water and sewer service at 18 Autumn Oak. He is outside our city limits. We have utilities in front of his property and they are of adequate size to properly serve his needs. We recommend that he be permitted to connect to our lines. He will pay a $500 sewer capital buy -in fee, a $250 water connection fee, and $450 water tap. His plumber will make his sewer tap. We recommend approval. Councilman Simmons moved for adoption of the Consent Agenda. Councilman Johnson seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Alfaro, Fuller and Pruett Mayor Hutto Nays: None Ordinance No. 5223 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF BROOKSIDE EQUIPMENT SALES, INC. FOR THE PURCHASE OF INDUSTRIAL TRACTORS AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF TWENTY -THREE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED TWENTY -TWO AND 08/100 ($23,622.08) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 890309 -4) 890309 -22 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 9, 1989 Resolution No. 1046 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN TO MAKE APPLICATION TO THE TEXAS CRIMINAL JUSTICE COUNCIL FOR A GRANT TO CONTINUE THE YOUTH AND LAW PROGRAM AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF. For bid tabulations see Attachments "C" through "E." Consider Proposed Ordinance, Awarding Bid, On Emergency Basis, For Demolition of Property at 2107 Maryland The structure at 2107 Maryland burned recently and has become a hazard to neighborhood children who are playing there. Therefore, emergency bids were taken for demolition of the structure. Two bids were received as follows: Daniels Dump Truck & Hauling $1,900 Magnolia Demolishing $2,350 Usually, the Urban Rehabilitation Standards Review Board would review the bids and authorize demolition since the low bidder is below $2,000. However, since this is an emergency, bids were taken on an emergency basis and routed directly to council. Councilman Johnson moved for adoption of the ordinance; Councilman Simmons seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons Alfaro, Fuller and Pruett Mayor Hutto Nays: None MZO 890309 -23 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 9, 1989 Ordinance No. 5228 AN ORDINANCE DECLARING THAT AN EMERGENCY SITUATION EXISTS, AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT OF THE SUM OF ONE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED AND NO /100 ($1,900.00) DOLLARS TO DANIELS DUMP TRUCK HAULING FOR THE DEMOLITION OF STRUCTURE LOCATED AT 2107 MARYLAND; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF. Consider Appointment to Urban Rehabilitation Standards Review Board This appointment will be made at a future meeting. City Manager's Report East Harris County Multi- Jurisdictional Narcotics Enforcement Unit - Council had previously approved the submittal of a grant application to the Criminal Justice Division for a narcotics enforcement unit. The administration has been notified that there are not sufficient funds to fund this program during this cycle. At this time no new grants are being funded. However, new applications will be accepted September 1. At that time, the administration will come back to council for permission to file another grant application. Harris County Appraisal District - Mr. Kenneth Graeber, Chief Appraiser for Harris County Appraisal District, spoke at the Chamber of Commerce luncheon recently. He indicated that there are two area offices that are part of the appraisal district, and one of those is in Baytown. Two or three years ago, council worked very hard to keep the Baytown office open. HCAD will be reviewing their budget soon and again, will consider whether or not to keep that office open. Council indicated that a resolution should be included on the next agenda, not only to encourage that the Baytown office remain open, but to have the services increased for the business and commercial properties, as well as personal properties. 890309 -24 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 9, 1999 Another comment Mr. Graeber made was that based on the district's information to this point, there will probably be a reduction in the assessed evaluation in Baytown of 3% or $300,000 less tax revenue. Employees' Health Insurance Program - During budget sessions, the administration made council aware of costs for employees' health insurance, and indicated that changes had been made which would hopefully reduce costs. Looking at a twelve- month period ending December 31, 1989, the loss ratio is more than 100% in all but three cases. Hopefully, the changes made in the plan will bring that loss ratio down. Councilman Philips inquired if the administration had considered HMO's or PPO's. Mr. Lanham responded that he is on the Texas Municipal League Board of Trustees, and there are some good experiences and some bad experiences with HMO's and PPO's. Pasadena has had a very bad experience with a PPO, but that's a possibility. Pages 2 and 3 give information on why the increases. These are national figures, but the report indicates that insurance carriers expect 21.5% increase in medical costs for 1989. Senior Citizen's Taxi Program - For several years, this program was funded in part by Area Agency on Aging. The adminis- tration has been advised that the reason Baytown is no longer receiving funds is that there are income guidelines in the present program. Based on the income guidelines, some of the seniors receive full fare while others receive half -fare. The cost of the current program is $70,000 which amount is being paid from Community Development funds. There are about 500 partici- pants and the cap for a married couple to participate is $129000. If the city is to apply for this grant, the application must be filed by April 3. Bill Cornelius, Director of Planning and Traffic, explained that the people who already qualify for free fares would not fall under this program, now or later. Those who are not paying half would continue to pay half. Council asked the administration to include an item in this regard on the next agenda. 890309 -25 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 9, 1989 im 1988 Sliplining Project - This project is complete with the exception of the change order. MUM Sidewalk Project - The sidewalk in the vicinity of Baytown Junior High on Caldwell between Post Oak and Robin has been completed. Most of the sidewalk in the vicinity of Travis Elementary has been completed. Spur 55 Bridge Water and Sewer Lines - The contractor has completed the line that is being attached to the bridge with the exception of installation which is about 90% complete. The lines are being pressure tested, and the contractor expects to complete that work in the middle of next week. Central District Wastewater Treatment Project - This project has been completed, and there will be a ribbon cutting within the next few weeks. Questions /Comments From Council - Councilman Philips stated that he was very pleased that Exxon had removed the facility at Texas and Main. He felt that Exxon should be encouraged to remove all their vacant property. Councilman Simmons pointed out that Exxon had indicated that the two other facilities would be painted and remodeled for sale. Councilman Pruett pointed out that there are vacant build- ings throughout the city, not only Exxon property. The city attorney explained that as long as the buildings are boarded up according to Urban Rehabilitation Standards, there is no basis for requiring removal. Councilman Johnson asked that the police department pay particular attention to a dump truck operation on Bob Smith that is utilizing Highway 146 and Bob Smith, rather than North Main. Chief Henscey stated that the department is aware of the problem and charges have been filed. cc;_ ti J. j, t I c ;tFIC'j -f_-)S.$ a pnislifqi!2 SC" I agniJ -iswuE bras -it4JaW 9 bi --i M -iuq2 13 ti% t a -19 1 risat I a -iT -is J s wq J a 6 W I :) i -IJa i U I t:k n sj it -_1, Ljrls wif.'j 'U i, a v:-s. - J" - �I l? qll)() j. agniJ -iswuE bras -it4JaW 9 bi --i M -iuq2 13 ti% t a -19 1 risat I a -iT -is J s wq J a 6 W I :) i -IJa i U I t:k n sj it -,w. i ionsuoo fno-i9 �I l? -to 7 0 lit J i -!_f 'clo IJ 72 ii 2; L !..!• "Awk wj 890309 -26 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 9, 1969 Recess Mayor Hutto recessed the open meeting into executive session to discuss land acquisition. When the open meeting reconvened, Mayor Hutto announced that no action was necessary as a result of the executive session. Adjourn There being no further business to be transacted the meeting was adjourned. Eileen P. Hall City Clerk 3.3.6 W 1959 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROSRAM PROPOSED STREETS ASPHALT STREETS N /OPEN DITCH Attachment "A" Subtotal 64,267 4 473,405 4 114,972 s 652,644 RATING AREA COST COST COST 1 -3 STREET !FROM) (TO) LEN67H VIDTH S.T. RECON. ASPH.OVL FA9.OVL TOTALS i Baywiy Post Oak 200 feet south 200 20 444 1,778 1 Bayvay Nonaysuckle 365 feet north 365 20 811 9,244 1 Bayvay Schrock 465 feet south 465 20 1033 4,133 1 Brovavood Harvey Cabinets 1045 20 2322 1,289 1 Cabinets Bayvay end. 1400 20 3111 12,444 1 Crov Bayvay end 1600 20 3556 14,222 1 Danobina uses James 1225 31 5036 20,144 1 Elvinta Hvy 146 Loop 201 361 22 882 3,530 1 Granville Dorris Myers 1325 18 2650 10,600 1 John A Park north 2340 18 4680 18,720 1 Kilgore James top of hill 1500 21 3500 14,000 1 Massey Tompkins 41. Main Singleton 5170 23 13212 52,849 1 Massey Tompkins Raccoon Crosby -CB 3290 23 8408 33,631 1 McKinney Nvy. 146 Massey Tompkin 3250 22 7944 31,778 1 Middleton Decker dead end 1600 17 3022 29,013 1 Nolan Nabry Loop 201 30 15 50 200 1 Oakvood Pine Magnolia 235 30 • 783 7,520 1 Oklahoma Arkansas Missouri 267 21 623 2,492 1 Scarlett North Fortner 1480 24 3947 15,787 1 Second E. Republic E. Texas 1040 31.5 3640 14,560 1 Wooster Douglas Bayvay 3490 20 7756 31,022 2 Airhirt Decker Texas 2858 24 7621 49,539 2 Airhart Texas J.B. LoFevre 3775 24 10067 65,433 2 Alva Nain RR Tracks 1389 22 3395 13,581 2 Atlantic Ontario Dead End 1430 27 4140 17,160 2 Ave. J Spur 201 dead end 1300 20 2889 271733 2 Fortinberry Byers Dorris 1320 30 2933 11,733 2 Nines Hain RR Tracks 1435 19 3029 12,118 2 Nabry Hwy 146 end 3730 13 53BB 21,:151 2 Will Hollov Hoodstone P.L. Esent 135 39 95 21340 2 Rollingvood Dr. Pia Oak Burnett 2740 20 6089 24,356 2 Mildvood Neador Mildrose 700 19 1478 31911 3 East Rd. CB/Lynch. South Rd. 2440 21 5693 221713 3 Francis Nain RR Tracks 1500 21 3500 14,000 3 Lancelot Raccoon 8ueensvood 730 39 3250 13,000 3 Lincoln Edison Lindberg 580 23 1482 %929 3 Pershing Barryaore Carnegie 700 17 1322 5,289 3 Superior Atlantic Laredo 770 V 2310 1,240 Subtotal 64,267 4 473,405 4 114,972 s 652,644 m ASPHALT STREETS W /CURB i BUTTER RATING AREA COST COST COST 1 -3 STREET (FROM) (TO) LEN67H WIDTH S.Y. RECON. ASPN.OVL FAB.OVL TOTALS I Jones American 9. Gulf 510 33 1870 31,790 1 Mississippi Kentucky Florida 1615 31 6252 106,278 1 sixth E. Texas Alford 3025 31 10419 41,678 2 Carolina Kentucky Main 2290 34 B651 34,604 2 Defeo Decker Freamon 340 41 1549 61196 2 Fifth Ruth W4 725 31 2497 91989 2 Harbor Dakvood Market 965 47 5039 201158 2 Meador Burnett Hackberry 850 30 2833 48,167 2 Murrill Sixth Seventh 260 31 896 31582 2 Nov Jersey Missouri Kentucky 1380 31 4753 19,013 2 Rice Morrell Schilling 560 31 1998 33,962 2 Sterling Decker dead end 800 31 2756 46,844 2 Sterling Main Decker 4380 40 19467 330,933 2 Nright Main N. Fourth 1405 31 4839 82,271 3 Carnegie Lindberg dead end 1295 31 4461 11,842 3 Homan Jones Harvard 690 27 2070 80280 3 Humble seventh Nvy 146 750 30 2500 10,000 3 Jews Pruett Main 1670 31 5752 23,009 3 live Oak Pruett Commerce 2070 31 7130 26,520 3 Maryland Louisiana Missouri 300 34 1133 19,267 3 Oregon Nov Mexico Florida 840 31 2893 11,573 3 Pearce Main Pruett 1685 45 8425 33,700 3 Tennessee Florida Mississippi 1140 31 3927 15,707 subtotal 699,512 ♦ 2831851 f 0 = 983,363 CONCRETE STREETS N /CURD i BUTTER RATING AREA COST COST COST 1 -3 STREET (FROM) (TO) LENGTH VIDTH I.Y. RECON. ASPH.OVL FAB.OVL TOTALS 1 Midvay Ammons Bridges 842 24 2245 14,595 1 Minnesota Colorado Market 1135 43 5423 35,248 1 Texas Seventh Main 2300 48 12267 49,067 2 Main S. Foyle Republic 3545 41 16149 64,598 2 Main N. Spur 201 Market 2960 34 11182 44,729 2 Oklahoma Visconsin Minnesota 345 31 1168 27,332 2 Scenic Garth end 1430 31 4926 32,016 2 Seventh Alexander 400 block 2300 31 7922 51,494 3 Chandler Ammons Bridges B60 27 2580 16,770 3 Oklahoma Missouri Ohio 970 31 3341 21,717 Subtotal 27,332 • 158,393 t 171,641 s 357,566 TOTAL FOR ALL 791,111 + 915,650 t 286,813 = 1,993,573 1989 STREET 1 . PROGRRM PROPOSED STREe.. AST STREETS W/OPEN DITCH TOTRL 4202,546 Ct cr a 0 m 0 rt to AREA COST COST COST STREET (FROM) (TO) LENGTH WIDTH S. Y. RECON. RSPH.OVL FAB.OVL TOTALS Rirhart Decker Texas 2858 24 7621 49,539 Bayway Post Oak 200 feet south 200 20 444 1,778 Bayway Honeysuckle 365 feet north 365 20 811 3,244 Bayway Schrock 465 feet south 465 20 1033 4,133 Cabiness Bayway end 1400 20 3111 12,444 Oanubina Texas James 1225 37 5036 20,144 Elvinta Hwy 146 Loop 201 361 22 882 3,530 John A Park North 2340 18 4680 189720 Midway Rmmons Bridges 842 24 2245 14,595 Oakwood Pine Magnolia 235 30 783 7,520 Oklahoma Rrkansas Missouri 267 21 623 2,492 Quail Hallow Woodstone P.L. Esmnt 135 39 585 2,340 Texas Seventh Main 2300 48 12267 49,067 Subtotal 7,520 + 117,893 + 64,133 = 189,546 Baker Road Median cut and repair ........................ ............................... 131000 TOTRL 4202,546 Ct cr a 0 m 0 rt to CITY OF BAYTOWN BID TABULATION TITLE: INDUSTRIAL TRACTOR 810 NUMBER: 8901 -38 DATE: 03 -01 -89 01:00 P.M. Attachment "C" I I I I ;YOMCO EQUIPMENT CO. !WATSON DISTRIBUTING :FOREE LANNNOMER OROOKSIDE EQUIPMENT 1 !ITEM! QTY !UNIT :DESCRIPTION I 1 ! 1 I 1 ! I 1 1 'UNIT PRICE!EXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEXT, PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICE :EXT. PRICE! 11. 0 2 : EA. 0 INDUSTRIAL TRACTORS: 0 13,603.001. 11,606.00: 12,446.00= 14,892.000 : NO BID 1 11,811.040 23,622.080 ! ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 : 1 ! 1 NOBEL: 1 KUBOTA -: N9450 0 JACOBSEN -0 620D 1 1 (JOHN DEERE! - 2355 0 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! ! 1 ! DELIVERY: I ! AS REQ. 0 130 -60 1 ! 0 1 60 DAYS I ! ! ! ! 1 0 I I DAYS ARO 1 0 I ! ARO ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 0 ! 1 SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1 1 1 1 1 1 ( 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I ! ! ! ! 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 ! ! 1 ! 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! ! ! ! ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ( 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 ( 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ( 1 1 1 1 1 t I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 = 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 It N PAGE 2 CITY OF BAYTOWN 810 TABULATION TITLE: INDUSTRIAL TRACTOR BID NUMBER: 8901 -38 DATE: 03 -01 -89 02 :00 P.M. : : 1 : ;JOHNSON t ROACH :H i H TRACTOR :NORTHGATE OUTDOOR :LANSDOWNE MOODY CO. 1 :ITEM: QTY :UNIT :DESCRIPTION I i It i i 1 i !UNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICElUNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICE UNIT PRICE:EXT, PRICE 1 1.: 2 1 EA. 1 INDUSTRIAL TRACTORS: : 14,665.00: 19,330.001 1 NO BID :010,600.00: 21,200.001 12,411.00: 24,812.00: MODEL: 1 KUBOTA -1 M -6030F 1 1 : HESSTON -1 55 -46 1 FORD - 1 4610 : 1 DELIVERY: 1 : 30 DAYS : : : ; 30 -40 : 1 15 -30 1 ARO : 1 : : DAYS : : DAYS ARO 1 1 SPECIAL CONDITIONS: : : : 1 10 DOES NOT MEET THE PTO HORSEPOWER IS 45 THE CLUTCH IS 11 INCHES s THE WEIGHT IS 1 1 1 4,050 LOS PAGE 3 CITY OF BAYTOWN BID TABULATION TITLE: INDUSTRIAL TRACTOR BID NUMBER: 8901 -38 DATE: 03 -01 -89 01 :00 P.M. w I I I 1 IB 1 F FARM !TRINITY VALLEY NATSON DISTRIBUTING 1ALVIN EQUIPMENT 1 !ITEM! QTY !UNIT (DESCRIPTION I I I ! 'UNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICU EXT. PRICE; 2 ; EA. ! INDUSTRIAL TRACTORS: 1 12,970.001 25,940.001 11,965.001 15,930.001 16,571.001 33,142.00! 12,081.001 24,164.00! ! ! ! 1 MODEL: 10UETZ ALLIS - 6250 1 FORD - 1 4610 !JACOBSEN -1 G4X4 1 CASE - 1 IH 585 ! I i I I DELIVERY: ! ! 30 DAYS ! 1 30 -110 1 1 30 -60 1 1 60 DAYS 1 ! 1 ! 1 1 ! ARO ! !GAYS ARO ! !GAYS ARO ! 1 ARO ! ! 1 1 1 SPECIAL CONDITIONS: ! ! ! ! 1 ! ! I ! ► ► ► ► ► ► ► ► ► ► ► ► ► I I I I I i i i i I I i i I i i i i i i i i i 1 i I PAGE 4 CITY OF BAYTOWN BID TABULATION TITLE: INDUSTRIAL TRACTOR BID NUMBER: 8901 -38 DATE: 03 -01 -89 01:00 P.M. I I I I IB 9 F FARM a GARDEN ; ; ; ;ITEM; QTY ;UNIT ;DESCRIPTION ;_ L_S I I ;UNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEXT, PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICE., 1. ; 2 I EA. ; INDUSTRIAL TRACTORS: I' 9,394.00; 18,788.00I I I I I I I 10 10 11 11 l MODEL: ;UNIVERSAL—; 550 I I I I I I I 1 DELIVERY: I ; 30 DAYS I I I ARO I I SPECIAL CONDITIONS: I' DOES NOT MEET I I I I ; I i I SPECS: i 11 11 11 I ; I l THE PTO HORSEPOWER I i i i IS 49.15 i BRAKES ARE DRY i i i i i BANK I WEIGHT IS 4,300 i ► i i i LOS. Is I t i i i It i t , i , i i i i i i I I I CITY OF BAYTOWN BID TABULATION TITLE: FENCE REPAIRS AT THE GRAY SPORTS COMPLEX BID NUMBER: 8901 -39 DATE: 01 -12 -89 02 :00 P.M. Attachment 11D" 0 I ! 1 !CREATIVE FENCING SYS.IH.B. HAMILTON !UNION FENCE _ ; TITER! QTY !UNIT 1DESCRIPTION I I I ! I I ! I !UNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICE! ! 1. 1 1! LOT ! FENCE REPAIRS: I I 91994.00! 1 23,962.001 1 8,513.031 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 2. 1 1 1 OPTION; REPLACE FENCE 1 1 1 1 1 ! I 1 ! 1 1 1 1 AT BACKSTOP ON: 1 1 I I 1 1 1 ! 1 t ! t1 I I 1 ' I I 1 1 EA. 1 FIELD A I EA. I FIELD C 1 EA. 1 FIELD 0 1 EA. 1 FIELD F 1 1 TOTAL: 1 1 1 660.00 1 660.001 1 1 660.00 1 660.001 1 It 660.00 1 660.001 ! 1 210.00 1 220.001 1 1 I I I ! I 1 1 12,194.001 1 13,962.001 1 ! ! ! ! 1 ! ! ! ! ( ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 366.93 1 388.931 388.93 1 388.931 388.93 1 386.9311 1 9,669.82 ' ! ! I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I ( 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 ► 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! ! ! ! ! ! I I ! ! ! ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 W CITY OF BAYTOWN TITLE. nEMOL- TT7C�N OP STRUCTURES_ BID TABULATION - 610: 2 -89 -63 ATE: MARCH 2, 1989 9:00 11.M. ® ®® � w � i � / ��■�� ■�i��s�� a �� ■�■��w�� Sri � ��■��■�■��■��i■■�■� �i � 'ii �iiiv ��ii � ��■�■�■�r.� I�� _ ��■��