Loading...
1986 07 10 CC Minutes60710-1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN July 10, 1986 The City Council of the City of Baytown, Texas, met in regular session on Thursday, July 10, 1986, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the Baytown City Hall with the following attendance: Fred T. Philips Jimmy Johnson Perry M. Simmons Roy Fuller Rolland J. Pruett Emmett 0. Hutto Fritz Lanham Larry Patterson Randy Strong Eileen P. Hall Absent: Ron Embry Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Mayor City Manager Assistant City Manager City Attorney City Clerk City Councilman The meeting was called to order with a quorum present. The invocation was offered by Councilman Fuller, after which the following business was conducted: Consider Minutes for the Regular Meeting Held on June 26, 1986 Councilman Philips moved for approval of the minutes for the meeting held on June 26, 1986; Councilman Johnson seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, and Pruett Mayor Hutto Abstained: Councilman Fuller Citizens Communication a. Reverend Robert L. Bell Will Appear Concerning Improve- ments in Oak Addition Reverend Bell appeared to express concern with the deterioration of Oak Addition, especially with regard to drugs, prostitution and burglaries. He stated that many elderly citizens were being victimized. He felt that more police patrol was necessary in the area, and he agreed that if a Neighborhood Crime Watch Program would help, he would be willing to work on that aspect. Also, Reverend Bell felt that signs were needed in close proximity to churches in the area to indicate that traffic should slow down for the church. 60710-2 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 10, 1986 Mayor Hutto stated that he understood Reverend Bell's concerns and suggested that the Reverend and other members of the community could meet with he and members of the staff on Monday, July 14 at 4:00 p.m. at City Hall. Reverend Bell indicated that this would be satisfactory. Mayor Hutto invited other members of council to attend, if possible. Consider Proposed Ordinance, Setting Rates for Houston Lighting and Power Company Randy Strong, City Attorney, mentioned that at the last council meeting, council had considered adoption of what is generally proposed as the City of Houston ordinance. That ordinance grants a rate increase of approximately $159,000,000 in the base rate of Houston Lighting and Power Company. At that time, the Office of Public Utility Counsel had indicated that they had further information that they would like for council to consider prior to making a final decision. Part of that information was attached as an exhibit to the memorandum to council furnished in the packet. Basically, there is a rate case where there are experts from the light company, City of Houston, PUC staff and the Office of Public Counsel. Each set of experts have their own opinions about how the rates should be structured based on what they feel the fair rate of return and financial integrity of the company dictate. In the memorandum that the city attorney furnished to council, he attempted to point out the items that were the major differences between the Office of Public Counsel and the City of Houston ordinance. Basically, the City of Houston is recommending $159,000,000 increase, while the office of Public Counsel is recommending $69,000,000 decrease. All the figures discussed include base rate only. The city attorney did not feel that it would be fair to consider the fuel costs because of the dramatic decline in fuel costs, and regardless of which theory one accepts, the customers are going to receive the benefit of fuel decrease. The Office of Public Counsel is urging that customers receive that decrease immediately. Under the Houston ordinance, they will receive that decrease in due course as fuel adjustments are made. The citizens and customers will get that money back if there has been an over collection. In response to an inquiry from council regarding the city's alternatives, the city attorney said that the rural case is already underway, leaving the city with two options: The city can adopt the Houston ordinance. Baytown is a part of the Coalition of Cities that is already represen- ted in the rural rate case. If Baytown adopts the City of Houston Ordinance, HL&P has indicated that they will not appeal that action. Therefore, as far as the municipal rate case, that would be over. However, the city would] continue to participate in the rural rate case through the coalition. Due to the manner in which the rate case has been structured this year, cities will have more input into the process than they have ever had in the past. If Baytown 60710-3 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 101 1986 elects to adopt a different amount than the City of Houston ordinance, particularly if it is a lower amount, the light company would have the option to appeal that decision to the PUC which would mean that the city would have to appear before the commission to conduct an appeal. If there would be an attempt to try to consolidate that appeal into the ongoing rural rate case, Baytown would be there in name only because the legal staff does not have the expertise to have much effect on the case. If council desires to follow that route, there may be some help available from the Office of Public Counsel. The other option would be, if the case was not consolidated with the ongoing rural rate case, Baytown would have its own separate hearing at some later date and in that case, Baytown would probably end up with whatever the PUC determines on the rural rate case. Another option is if Baytown adopted the Houston ordin- ance and the PUC came in at a lower rate, under the Public Utility Regulatories Act, Baytown would have the option to open up the rates again in a few months to attempt to have the rates in Baytown lowered to match that which the PUC develops. That may be part of the plan of the coalition if the commission develops a lower figure. The attorney made reference to an electric utility rate survey which had been prepared by the PUC. It indicated the standard residential rate for several companies around the state and HL&P is in the middle range. The rate in 1986 for 500 kilowatts was $37.98 and for 1,000 kilowatts was $80.36. If one looks at the right hand column, HL&P stands out because it has the highest rate, but one needs to look over to see that the company also has a higher useage as well. Councilman Philips pointed that there are about 43 cities in the Coalition of Cities and about 38 of those have adopted the City of Houston proposal which indicates that that group is not going to take any unilateral action against the City of Houston proposal. The city attorney responded that that was correct and this was the group appearing before the PUC in the rural rate case. Also, he pointed out that about 5 out of 15 cities that are not part of the coalition have adopted the City of Houston proposal. The PUC staff figures have recommended a $135,000,000 increase in the base rate for HL&P which is very close to the Houston figure. One of the primary differences is the method in which depreciation is taken into account. If you go back and use the same method, that brings those figures much closer together. Therefore, both proposals are very close on the basic issues. Councilman Fuller expressed the feeling that Baytown would have very little effect as one small entity involved in the proceedings if Baytown should elect to go with a different proposal than Houston; Councilman Philips concurred. Councilman Fuller moved to adopt the ordinance; Councilman Philips seconded the motion. 60710-4 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - duly 10, 1986 Mayor Hutto inquired how in the City of Houston's recommendation did the Director of Public Service reconcile the issue that HL&P is in extremely good financial condition and that in 1985, the company earned over 17% return on equity? Ms. Jane Cater, Director of Public Service for the City of Houston, responded that in the last rate case the PUC authorized HL&P to earn 16.75% return on equity. They then subtracted from the 16.75% fifty basis points which took it down to 16.25% and that was a penalty for mismanagement of construction of both the South Texas and Allen's Creek Nuclear Projects. That 16.25% is comparable to 14.75% which the City of Houston has authorized in this rate case. The reason that it is down is that money rates in general have come down over the past two years. Mr. Boyle has commented that the Federal Energy Regu- lation Commission has authorized a return on equity of 12.9% for electric utilities regulated by FERC. That is what is called a generic rate of return. This is an idea that has recently been introduced in Texas. The Governor wrote a letter to the three public utility commissions of Texas a few months ago and asked that that idea be developed for use in Texas. The three state commissions then asked for comments statewide, and the City of Houston was one of over twenty parties that filed comments. Houston was opposed to the application of generic rate of return for primarily two reasons: If it is a generic rate of return, the assumption could be made that it is an average rate of return and if that average were determined to.be 14.75%, if a utility were riskier than average, the utility would be authorized a higher rate of return, but if the utility would be less risky than average, it would be authorized a lower rate of return which could be 14.5%. If you then go into a hearing with the assumption that this generic rate of return is appropriate, a utility that is less risky is not going to argue about it, because they should be given 14.5%, but under the generic rate of return would be given 14.75%. On the other hand, a utility that is entitled to a higher rate of return will argue. Therefore, the argument that a generic rate of return produces judicial economy and therefore, less time in hearing will not hold true. Ms. Cater stated that in February, for Central Power and Light, which is the utility that serves the Corpus Christi area, the state commission authorized 14.9% return on equity. This is higher than the 14.75% recommended for HL&P. Last month, in the GSU case the settlement number was 15.3% return on equity which is higher than is being recommended for HL&P. Therefore, Houston feels that the 14.75% is reasonable. It is a good indication of the risk associated with investment in that utility and it truly reflects the decline in money costs that have occurred over the past years. Mayor Hutto pointed out that the company can borrow money now at 6-8% less than what they could 1h years ago. 60710-5 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 10, 1986 Ms. Cater referred to the information provided council during the hearing on July 10. On Schedule 7 is the calcu- lation of HL&P's weighted cost of capital. It shows that their debt is acquired at a weighted cost of 8.76% and common equity stock is at 14.75%. Those are each weighted by their relative weighting in the capital structure to come up with the weighted average cost of capital, 11.58% The 11.58% is what is multiplied times the rate base and then revenue requirement determinations are included. Mayor Hutto noted that when prime was up to 20%, the company still received over 14% return. Now their weighted cost is about 8.75%. Councilman Philips stated that from the information shown, the company did not borrow much money at that time. Ms. Cater indicated that the company has recently re- financed a great deal of their high cost debt. The city attorney pointed out that the Office of Public Counsel is only recommending a percentage point less on return on equity. Therefore, the experts involved in this case all agree that this general area of rate of return is appropriate. Councilman Simmons commented that the options presented by the city attorney are bad and worse. He considers the Houston ordinance as bad because he disagrees with having construction work in progress as part of the rate base. He does not feel that the customer should have to pay for building plants and facilities which increases the assets of a corporation which if liquidated, the consumer would not receive any benefit. The other alternate to adopt a different rate and appear before the PUC is not feasible either. The city attorney pointed out that the company must construct new facilities because they are required to furnish the service. If the company is required to build new facilities because of growth, the theory is it is only fair to put some of that cost back to the people forcing the company to build new facilities. Mayor Hutto pointed out that it is not out of the realm of these cities that have already approved this to take a second look and reconsider the adoption of the ordinance. Councilman Simmons stated that there has been some progress in that area because at one time, the company was allowed 100% of the work in progress and that has been decreased to 32%. In response to an inquiry from council, the city attorney explained that on Page 3 of the ordinance is what the residential rate structure will be. The ordinance does not go through and specify the rates for all the other classes. The premises is that the rate structure will be that which is set forth by the company in its petition as to all of the classes, and the $159,000,000 increase will be spread amongst all the different rate classes according 60710-6 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 10, 1986 to the methodology which the company presented in their petition with the exception of residential. Therefore, the $159,000,000 is not just for residential, but a system -wide increase. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Fuller and Pruett Nays: Mayor Hutto ORDINANCE NO. 4494 AN ORDINANCE SETTING RATES TO BE CHARGED BY HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY FOR ELECTRIC UTILITY SERVICE WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS; CONTAINING FINDINGS AND PROVIVIONS RELATED TO THE SUBJECT; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES; CONTAINING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR THE -EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Consider Proposed Ordinance, Establising a 50 m.p.h. Speed Limit on Spur 330 (Decker Drivel from Rollingbrook Drive to Wade Road.. Several months ago, the city asked the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation for a traffic and engineering investigation to determine what the speed limit should be on that portion of Decker Drive. That investi- gation revealed that 85 percentile speeds within this area were between 48 and 52 mph. The Department of Highways and Public Transportation has no objection to Baytown's request to establish a 50 mph speed zone. The present speed limit is 45 mph. The administration recommended adoption of the ordinance. Councilman Simmons moved for adoption of the ordinance; Councilman Philips seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Fuller and Pruett Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 4495 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT OF 50 MILES PER HOUR FOR MOTOR VEHICLES ON -A PORTION OF SPUR 330 (DECKER DRIVE) BETWEEN ROLLINGBROOK DRIVE AND WADE ROAD; REPEALING ORDINANCES INCONSISTENT HEREWITH; CONTAINING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PRESCRIBING A MAXIMUM PENALTY OF TWO HUNDRED AND N0/100 ($200.00) DOLLARS; AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLI- CATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. 1 ,11) 60710-7 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 10, 1986 Consider Proposed Ordinance, Authorizing the Mayor to Execute an Intergovernmental Agreement with H-GAC for Funding for Transit Planning - The agreement would provide funds that will pay for 80% of the cost associated with two transit planning projects currently underway: working with the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation to locate a Park and Ride facility on state-owned right of way in Baytown and working with National Transit Services, Inc. to initiate a non - subsidized transit service between Baytown and Houston. The city would provide 20% matching funding with in kind services and the grant would be $5,000. The administration recommended approval of the ordinance. Councilman Johnson indicated that he would favor the ordinance as long as Baytown would not need to expend any funds, and this was not connected with establishing services through METRO which the people had voted against. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Fuller and Pruett Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 4496 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST TO AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREE- MENT WITH THE HOUSTON-GALVESTON AREA COUNCIL FOR LOCAL TRANSIT PLANNING; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Consider' Proposed Ord'in'ance,' Awarding Bid 'for Carpeting The proposed ordinance will award the bid for carpeting of the community building's lobby and hallways. These areas are heavily traveled and people have slipped there and fallen at times. This area is used by employees to move heavy equipment for the various programs available at the center. Seven bids were received. The low bid of Floor Gallery does not meet the gauge and stitch requirements of the specifications. The bid of Floor Gallery is $ .53 lower than the bid that does meet specifications which is the bid of Carpet World, Inc. W. O'Brien* Reco'gni'zed W. O'Brien, owner of Floor Gallery, stated that he had a problem with the fact that his bid figures had been adjusted and that he did not feel that all the bidders were bidding on the same carpeting. 60710-8 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 10, 1986 With regard to the extension of the figures, the city manager clarified that the city reserves the rights to make correction in extension of figures, and with regard to the specifications, council explained that the city desires to obtain the widest spectrum possible on specifications in order to assure that the city can obtain the best possible price. Councilman Fuller moved to adopt the ordinance; Councilman Philips seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Fuller and Pruett Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 4497 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF CARPET WORLD, INC. FOR THE PURCHASE OF CARPETING AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF FOUR THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED NINETY AND 60/100 ($4,890.60) DOLLARS. For bid tabulation, see Attachment "A." Consider Proposed Resolution No. 9511 Protesting the Application Filed by Harris County Fresh Water Supply District No. 27 Harris County Fresh Water Supply District No. 27 (Coady) has filed an application for a permit to discharge effluent from a sewage treatment plant into Goose Creek Stream. The district has no plant, and the City of Baytown is presently providing sewage treatment services to the district. It has been a goal of the City of Baytown for many years to eliminate the discharge from waste treatment plants into the upper reaches of Goose Creek Stream. The plant north of Baker Road, on Goose Creek Stream was taken out of service and a transmission line was constructed along Goose Creek Stream to convey the sewage to the West Main Plant. Since Baytown is providing treatment services to the Coady District, along with the fact that it is a long standing policy of the City of Baytown to reduce the dis- charge of effluent into Goose Creek Stream, the adminis- tration recommended approval of the resolution, protesting the application filed by Harris County Fresh Water Supply District No. 27. Billy Plante, President of Harris County Fresh Water Supply District No. 27, explained that the original permit that the district held has expired. The contract with the City of Baytown provides that the district must provide two years written notice of any proposal to construct a facility. The district needs to retain the permit in order to utilize that as a bargaining tool to try to keep its rates 60710-9 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 10, 1986 as low as possible. This district is probably the highest paying district with an average water bill for 3,000 gallons of $24 of which $8 is paid for water and the remainder for sewerage treatment. Mr. Plante also stated that there has been considerable back up of the system, and the district has expended $20,000 to close the system up and smoke it to correct points of infiltration. There have been over 90 points of infiltra- tion that have been corrected this year. If it comes to the point that the Craigmont Station is not furnishing the needed services to the district, the district would have to make that known to council and then the district would need to make a decision as to which direction to take. Councilman Philips stated that Baytown expended a great amount of money to prevent the dumping of effluent into Goose Creek Stream, and he would not favor making Baytown vunerable in that regard. However, if council needs to go back and reconsider the rates, that is a viable solution. Mr. Plante stated that the rates were automatically renewed for two years because of a provision in the contract. Council assured Mr. Plante that the contract could be renegotiated at the consent of both parties and that should not be a detriment. Mayor Hutto suggested that the administration work with Mr. Plante in this regard. Councilman Johnson moved for adoption of the resolution; Councilman Pruett seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Fuller and Pruett Mayor Hutto Nays: None RESOLUTION NO. 951 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS, PROTESTING THE APPLICATION FOR A NEW WASTE DISPOSAL PERMIT FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES BY HARRIS COUNTY FRESH WATER SUPPLY DISTRICT NO. 27; URGING THE TEXAS WATER COMMISSION TO DENY SUCH APPLICATION; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Consent Agenda Council removed Item d to be considered separately. 60710-10 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 10, 1986 Mayor Hutto commented concerning Item b, the establish- ment of a construction speed zone on Highway 146 for the ship channel bridge construction. He reminded council that the state has established such construction speed zones in the past and would allow the signs to remain in place over the weekend and holidays when no work was in progress. Council considered the Consent Agenda as follows: a. We mailed bid invitations to five vendors and received three proposals for automatic polymer dilution/feed systems for the Central and East Wastewater Treatment Plants. The low bidder is Environmental Treatment Systems with a bid of $16,170. We recommend approval of Proposed Ordinance No. 60710-5. b. The Department of Highways and Public Transportation has requested the city establish a reduced speed zone along State Highway 146 along sections of the roadway that will be affected by construction of the new ship channel crossing. The Highway Department has indicated that they anticipate a November 1986 letting for this project. We recommend approval of Proposed Ordinance No. 60710-6. c. Invitations were mailed to nine vendors and six bids were received for the purchase of uninterruptible power source equipment for computers in the Police Department and Municipal Court. The bid of Computer Room Technologies for $1,995.00 is the low bid. However, we had a provision in the bid to purchase an additional UPS if we wished to do so and we recommend that we purchase an additional UPS for the City Clerk's computer system. Therefore, we are recommending that Council approve the purchase of four UPS's from Computer Room Technologies, the low bidder. We recommend approval of Proposed Ordinance No. 60710-7. e. Proposed Ordinance No. 60710-9, will amend the city code to decrease the membership of the Mechanical Board from seven to five members by deleting the position of air conditioning and/or refrigeration journeymen and the position of registered professional engineer. The remaining five positions would be as follows: registered mechanical engineer, licensed mechanical contractor, licensed air conditioning contractor, citizen not in the building industry, and a general contractor. We recommend approval. 60710-11 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 10, 1986 f. Mr. L.E. Caswell, 4727 Raccoon Drive, has requested water and sewer service from the city. Mr. Caswell proposes to install a grinder pump and will connect to the city's force main located on Raccoon Drive. This line services the Timber Ridge Addition. We recommend approval. Councilman Philips moved to approve the Consent Agenda, Items a, b, c, and e; Councilman Johnson seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Fuller and Pruett Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 4498 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF ENVIRONMENTAL TREATMENT SYSTEMS, INC. FOR THE PURCHASE OF AUTOMATIC POLYMER DILUTION/FEED SYSTEMS AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF SIXTEEN THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY AND N0/100 ($16,170.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 60710-5) ORDINANCE NO. 4499 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS, ESTABLISHING A PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT OF 35 MPH ON STATE HIGHWAY 146 DURING CONSTRUCTION ON STATE HIGHWAY 146; PRESCRIBING A MAXIMUM PENALTY OF TWO HUNDRED AND N0/100 ($200.00) DOLLARS FOR EACH VIOLATION THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. ORDINANCE NO. 4500 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF COMPUTER ROOM TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE PURCHASE OF UNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER SOURCES AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED SIXTY AND N0/100 ($2,660.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 60710-7) ORDINANCE NO. 4501 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, AMENDING SECTION 16h-2, "MECHANICAL BOARD -CREATION, MEMBERSHIPS, APPOINTMENTS;" REPEALING INCONSISTENT PRO- VISIONS; CONTAINING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. (Proposed Ordinance No. 60710-9) For bid tabulations, see Attachments "B" and "C." 60710-12 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 10, 1986 Consider Proposed Ordinance, Awarding Contract for Woodland Academy Sanitary Sewer Project - The city manager explained that the ordinance and bid tabulation for Item d had been placed at each council place. The ordinance would authorize awarding the contract to the low bidder which is Solesbee Construction Company in the amount of $20,397.75. The cost of construction will be borne by the users and approval of the ordinance would be contingent upon the city's receipt of the funds prior to execution of the contract. Councilman Johnson moved to adopt the ordinance contingent on the city's receipt of the funds prior to execution of the contract. Councilman Fuller seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Fuller and Pruett Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 4502 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AND ATTEST TO A CONTRACT WITH SOLESBEE CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR THE WOODLAWN ACADEMY SANITARY SEWER PROJECT; MAKING OTHER PROVISIONS RELATED THERETO; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. For bid tabulation, see Attachment "D." City Manager's Report Delegates from South Australia - Local governmental officials from South Australia are planning to visit Baytown on July 18 between 9:00 and 10:00 a.m. There is a reception that is being planned at Lee College. More details will be available later in the month, and council will be notified. Drainage - City forces have completed installation of additional drainage pipes on Lazy Lane, and they are now working on Holly Street which project is about 75% complete. Elevated Water Storage Facility - The contractor is working on the elevated water storage facility. To date, 32 piles of the 54 have been driven. Completion is scheduled for this week. The contractor expects to complete all of the foundation work two weeks later. The steel shop fabrication of steel is over 95% complete, and the first shipment is eminent. The field erectors are scheduled to be moving in in two or three weeks. Water line on Cedar Bayou Lynchburg Road - This project has been completed, and the line is being chlorinated. The line will be tested next week. 60710-13 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 10, 1986 Community Development Street and Drainage Improvement - Angel Brothers has begun excavation on Huggins. They have completed installation of the storm sewer, and they are nearing completion of the two inch water line on Willow Street. The entire project involved Ash, Willow and Huggins and is about 20% complete. Sliplining - The sliplining contractor has completed the sliplining of about 2,860 feet of 12 inch sanitary sewer on Huggins and 908 feet of 6 inch pipe on Ash Street. All of the service connections have been made and that project is complete with the exception of cleanup. ' The other sliplining contractor has installed 1,285 feet and 23 service connections have been made between Decker Drive and Glenhaven. A change order was necessary to slipline 460 feet of pipe on McKinney Road where there have been several cave-ins this year. Lift Station and Relief Sewer Discharge Force Main - The lift station and relief sewer discharge force main for the east side has been completed and is scheduled for final inspection on July 25. West Main Sewerage Treatment Plant - On the emergency work that is being done at the West Main Sewerage Treatment Plant, the repair of the corner sweeps has been completed. East and West District Sewerage Treatment Plants - The alarm system that will be used to operate the East and West District Sewerage Treatment Plants has been ordered and is scheduled for mid -September. Personnel Study - Council scheduled a special meeting for Monday, July 14 at 5:00 p.m. to meet with Waters, Trego & Davis to be presented with the personnel pay plan. City Manager's Vacation - Mr. Lanham notified council that he plans to be on vacation beginning July 28 through August 12. He will present council with the proposed budget for the 1986/87 Fiscal Year prior to his departure. Questions/Comments of Council Councilman Philips stated that the Ambulance Committee was scheduled to meet next week; however, since Larry Patterson, Assistant City Manager, is unavailable, that meeting will be rescheduled as soon as possible when Mr. Patterson returns. Councilman Johnson requested that the administration write a letter to the various representatives protesting the dumping of nuclear waste anywhere in the State of Texas. In response to an inquiry from council, Mr. Lanham stated that the police department is contacting other cities to determine how they treat the handling of cats. 60710-14 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 10, 1986 Councilman Simmons commented that the highway department did repair the problem area at Airhart and Decker, but now someone has disposed of a mattress along Decker Drive between Airhart and Rollingbrook Drive. Councilman Philips noted that Texas Avenue near the Oak Tree on the east side of the street is in a poor state of repair. Adjourn There being no further business to be transacted, the meeting was adjourned. Eileen P. Hall, City Clerk CITY OF BAYTOWN BID TABULATION TITLE: CARPETING BID NUMBER: 6605-79 DATE: 6-25-86 2:00 P.M. Revised 7-8-86 Attachment "A" !BAYTOWN PAINT I CAR. ;CARTER FLOORS I CER. ;FLOOR GALLERY :SHERWIN ' MEN! QTY ;UNIT ;DESCRIPTION WILLIAMS , ;UNIT PRICE'EXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEXT PRICEIUNIT PRICE!EXT PRICEIUNIT PRICE lEXT PRICE; I 1 I118 ISQ.YDICARPETING 13.5316 5,790.84I 20.65I 8,B38.001 11.68I` 41890.01I 12.591, 5,110.86' I I ; !per specifications. NAKE/MODEL:IWELLCO/FORUM IARMSTRONG/ANTRON ICOLT/226 ,AROMORE/26, , OELIYERY:I1-5 WEEKS I 115 DAYS I I18 DAYS I/5 DAYS ; SPECIAL CONDITIONS:I4810 BASED UPON I I HOES NOT NEET THE '# B[D BASED UPON I124.11 SQ. YARDS. , I I I I I ;GAUGE AND STITCH 1414 SQ. YARDS. ' RE:UIREMENTS. I I I I I9610 BASED UPON I I I 1418.67 SQ. YARDS. ' ' 'BIDS MAILED TO 12 VENDORS. I I CITY OF BAYTOWN 810 TABULATION PAGE 2 TITLE: CARPETING BIO MUNBER: 0605-79 DATE: 6-25-86 2:00 P.M. ;[TEN; QTY ;UNIT ;DESCRIPTION ITHONASON INTERIORS ;INTERIOR CONNECTIONS ;CARPET WORLD ; 1 ;UNIT PRICE'EXT. PRICE'UNIT PRICE'EXT. PRICE'UN1T PRICE'EXT. PRICE'UNIT ;SQ.YDICARPETING, per 12.1SI 5,200.20: PRICE' PRICE'EXT. —� 1428 , I I !specifications. 13.25I 5,671.00,' 11.70I' 4,890.60: ' I I I I MAKE/NOOEL:ISTRATTON/SHEFFIELD I I !ATLANTIS I I ISTRATTON/SHEFFIELD I IvXL@ I I I I9XL9 I DELIVERY:1/5 DAYS I I30 DAYS I III-30 DAYSI I I I I SPECIAL CONDITIONS:I I I I MID BASED UPON 418 I I I I I I SQ. YARDS! I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF BAYTOWN 810 TABULATION TITLE: AUTOMATIC POLYMER OILUTION/FEED SYSTEM BID NUMBER: 8605-71 DATE: 6-24-06 2:00 P.M. Attachment "B" 1 !ITEM! ! QTY !UNIT 1 !DESCRIPTION 11NCHLOR SERVICES 1ENVIROQUIP, INC. !ENVIRONMENTAL TREAT. ; 3 ! EA.IAUTOMATIC POLYMER !UNIT PRICEIE%T. PRICE'UNIT ! 5,929.00: 17,787.001 ! PRICE!EXT. PRICE!UNIT PR10E!EXT. ! PRICE UNIT PRICE,EXT. 5,930.001 17,790.001 5,390.00! PRICE ! ! 1 !DILUTION/FEED SYSTEM ! ! 16,170.00! ! 1 1 1 1 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 1 MANE/MODEL: ISTRANCO/118500-2 !STRANCO/PB500-2 :STRANCO/P6500-2 ! 1 1 1 1 DELIVERY: ! 45 DAYS ' 3 0 DAYS 1 GAYS ' ! ! ! ! � � � � ,30 1 ! ! ! 1 1 !BIDS MAILED TO 5 VENDORS.! 1 ! 1 1 1 1 ! CITY OF BAYTOWN BID TABULATION TITLE: UNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER SOURSE 810 NUMBER: 8605-70 DATE: 6-24-86 2:00 P.N. Attachment "C" ;ITEM: QTY ;UNIT ;DESCRIPTION MONSPEC, INC. :PTI INDUSTRIES :ENERSON ELECTRIC !GLOBAL COMPUTER ' -� I !UNIT PRICE:EXT. PRICEIUMIT PRICEIEXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEXT PRI EA. ;UNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER ; 899.0011 2,697.00,1 1,000.00:' 3,000.00! EIUNIT PRICEIEXT PRICE' 3 ; I SOURCE 699.001 2,697.001 2,344.151 7,032.45: I , , 1 1 , 1 1 I NAKE/NOOEL:IENERSON/AP-1000 :DATA SHIELD/AT-1100A :ENERSON/AP-1000 :CSPEIIAI : ! DELIVERY:I25 DAYS ! 110 DAYS 1 III DAYS I I15-20 DAYS! SPECIAL CONDITIONS:! : !'HAVE 810 A 1,000 ! ! ! I I ! ! I ! MATT UPS.! I ! ! ! I ! I I 1 1 1 1 I ! ! I (BIDS NAILED TO 9 VENDORS.: ! ! ' I 1 I 1 1 1 ! ! ! I I ! ' 1 1 � I i � 1 I CITY OF BAYTOWN BID TABULATION PAGE 2 TITLE: UNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER SOURCE 810 NUMBER: 8605-70 DATE: 6/24/86 2:00 P.N. IBARNHILL ASSOC. ;COMPUTER BOON TECH. ' IITENI QTY ;UNIT ;DESCRIPTION ; I l 13 I EA. DUNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER I 3,153.00I ��•� 9,459.00I .e,wa cnl. rll 665.00I 1,995.00I [- 1111 rR16[' I 7i1. PKIG 'UN11 PRICE' I I JIT. PRIG I 1 I I I 11SOURCE I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 I , I 1 1 1 I I I HAKE/MODEL: IGPS/IK110-61 !EMERSOM AP-1000 ' ' 1 ' 1 I I I DELIYERY:I30 DAYS I I30 DAYS I I I I I 1 , I I I I I I I I , 1 Attachment "D" WOODLAND ACADEMY SANITARY SEWER PROJECT BID RESULTS Job No. 8607-09 July 9, 1986 Angel Brothers Enterprises, Inc. Beach Construction Company, Inc. Bill McDonald Construction Company H. B. Hamilton Construction Company Solesbee Construction, Inc. $22,610/$42,590 # 3 $20,559/$33,210 #2 $35,421/$49,696 #4 $12,429.60/$20,397.75 41