1985 07 25 CC Minutes50725 -1
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN
July 25, 1985
The City Council of the City of Baytown, Texas, met
in regular session on Thursday, July 25, 1985, at 6:30 p.m.
in the Council Chamber of the Baytown City Hall with the
following attendance:
Fred T. Philips
*Jimmy Johnson
Perry M. Simmons
Ron Embry
Gerald Dickens
Roy L. Fuller
Fritz Lanham
Larry Patterson
Randy Strong
Eileen P. Hall
Absent: Emmett 0. Hutto
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Mayor Pro Tempore
City Manager
Assistant City Manager
City Attorney
City Clerk
Mayor
The meeting was called to order with a quorum present.
The invocation was offered by Reverend Holmes, St. John
Baptist Church, afterwhich the following business was
conducted:
Consider Minutes for the Regular Meeting Held July 11, 1985
Councilman Simmons moved for approval of the minutes
for the meeting held on July 11, 1985; Councilman Dickens
seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Council members Simmons and Dickens
Mayor Pro Tempore Fuller
Nays: None
%Abstained: Council members Philips and Embry
?Absent: Councilman Johnson
Receive Petitions
No petitions were presented.
Texas 0. Dittman Will Appear
*Councilman Johnson present.
50725-2
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 25, 1985
Texas 0. Dittman, 15 S. Ashbel, appeared before council
to state that he had been unable to comply with the require-
ments of the electrical inspector, and petitioned council to
have his electrical service restored. Council informed Mr.
Dittman that it will be necessary for him to meet the require-
ments of the electrical code in order for electrical service
to be provided to the Baltimore Hotel since the health,
safety and welfare of the general public is at issue. Mr.
Dittman was asked to contact the inspection department
for an inspection when the requirements have been met.
Consider Adoption of Deed Enforcement Policy
Randy Strong, City Attorney, explained that some of the
impetus behind this proposed policy statement is some of
the local civic associations failing to discover that a
structure was being built in violation of the deed restrictions.
This policy was drafted with the idea of trying to involve
the local civic associations as soon as possible, because
there are a number of deed restrictions that the city does
not have the power to enforce and others such as building
setback lines, while the city may have the power, the city
may not be aware of what the various setback lines are
for the various subdivisions.
Under the proposed policy, when a person comes in to
apply for a building permit, they will be required to
present a copy of the deed restrictions for the subdivision
and sign an affidavit that will attach to that stating
that deed restrictions have been reviewed, and the pro-
posed plans do not violate the restrictions. If city
council required the affidavit by ordinance, the city
would fall under a state law which would make a false
statement punishable under state law by a fine of $2,000
and one year in jail. Once this affidavit is signed
and the building permit application completed, the
building department would take the information and send
notification to the designated representatives of the
local civic associations. The civic association would
then be entitled to come down and review the building
plans. Hopefully, at that time, these representatives
could catch such things as building setback regulations
and other type violations. If in checking, the civic
association discovers something that would be in violation
that the city can enforce, the city could then, in fact,
withhold the building permit until that was corrected.
If the violation is of a type that the city has no authority
to enforce, the city would not be in position to withhold
the permit or stop construction of the project, but at that
point the civic association would have advance knowledge
to prepare their own legal action to stop the violation.
In response to an inquiry from council, the city attorney
explained that under the proposed policy it would be up
to the person requesting the building permit to supply a
copy of the deed restrictions. Those are on file with the
deed records of Harris County.
50725 -3
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 25, 1985
Councilman Embry stated that his intent in putting
together a deed enforcement policy is to provide some degree
of communication and possibly in a case of a violation some
enforcement to aid in maintaining the residential quality of
a neighborhood. At the same time, he did not want the
policy to be a hindrance to an applicant; therefore, he
wanted to make certain that the applicant is aware what the
deed restrictions are and that he is willing to attest that
those are being complied with. Personally, he would be
willing to place that burden on the applicant, but he felt
that that would be a burden. In investigating the possibilities
of maintaining a file, the problem of accuracy and in event
of error, liability to the city was discussed. Therefore,
Councilman Embry stated that he would be willing to place
the burden on the applicant to secure a copy of the restric-
tions.
Councilman Fuller stated that he had spoken with Mayor
Hutto who stated that there are complete copies of the deed
restrictions that could be available to the city which could
be furnished out of the city's file at a reproduction cost.
However, it is obvious that this procedure would involve a
certain cost administratively, plus the liability to the
city.
In the case of new subdivisions, the developer is
responsible for establishing what the deed restrictions will
be and after the subdivision reaches a certain percentage of
completion, then the responsibility for enforcement of deed
restrictions shifts from the developer to the civic associa-
tion.
In response to query from council, the city attorney
stated that most of the deed restrictions filed since 1950
are automatically renewed, but the very old deed restric-
tions from the 30's and 40's are for a set period and have
expired unless renewed. The more common problem, however,
is not the restrictions expiring due to time, but due to the
neighborhood allowing commercial activity without challenge.
The policy is designed to help prevent the last problem.
Deed restrictions are contract or agreement among the owners
and the responsibility for enforcement of deed restrictions
rests with the property owners of the subdivisions. It is
only through special state statute that the city is involved
in a small area of enforcement.
Councilman Simmons suggested that the applicants for
permits could be referred to the title companies for a copy
of their deed restrictions since the title companies have a
complete file. Councilman Embry concurred that this would
be a very good compromise position based on the costs of the
city administering a file and the potential liability. The
city could maintain a list of reputable title companies to
distribute.
The city attorney explained that the legal department
would require a certified copy of the deed restriction in a
case where suit is filed on behalf of the homeowners, but
initially or for the purpose of the building permit, a
certified copy would not be necessary.
50725 -4
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 25, 1985
Councilman Embry moved that council adopt the policy as
stated and furthermore that council direct the city ad-
ministration to prepare an ordinance consistent with the
policy for subsequent consideration by council; Councilman
Dickens seconded the motion.
The city manager pointed out that under the policy it
is very possible that the permit could be issued during the
review period by the civic association.
Councilman Fuller stated that he agreed wholeheartedly
that the permit should not be withheld during the review
period because the inspection department has been working
very hard to improve the processing time for permits. After
notification and review by the civic association, if there
is a problem, they can work toward its resolve since they
will have early notification.
Councilman Embry agreed that it is necessary to be fair
to the applicant, but also there should be a fair period of
time for review by the civic association.
The city attorney emphasized that the policy does not
contemplate the withholding of the permit while the civic
association reviews same. The intent was that if the applicant
meets all qualifications for building permit before the
civic association completes its review, the permit would be
issued. Later, the permit could be withdrawn or suit filed
to stop a violation.
Also, the city attorney stated that he had understood
that this was to be an administrative policy adopted by city
council, and it was not his original thought that the policy
was to be in ordinance form. The requirement that an affidavit
be signed would need to be adopted by ordinance and incorporated
into the building code in order for the city to take advantage
of the state law concerning false statements on the affidavit.
This was the only thing that the city attorney had contemplated
including in an ordinance.
Mayor Pro Tempore Fuller clarified that what council
would be doing at this time is adopting the policy statement
as set forth with an ordinance to follow to adopt the procedure
for completion of an affidavit with a penalty provision for
violation. The vote follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons,
Embry, and Dickens
Mayor Pro Tempore Fuller
Nays: None
50725 -5
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 25, 1985
Consider Proposed Resolution No. 919, Approving Resolution
of Baytown Industrial Development Corporation Concerning
Issuance of Bonds to Finance a Project for Randall's
Center /Baytown
CERTIFICATE FOR
RESOLUTION APPROVING RESOLUTION OF THE
BAYTOWN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
CONCERNING ISSUANCE OF BONDS TO FINANCE A PROJECT FOR
RANDALL'S CENTER / BAYTOWN
I, the undersigned Mayor of the City of Baytown, Harris
County, Texas (the "Unit "), hereby certify as follows:
1. The City Council (the "Governing Body ") of the
Unit convened in regular session at Baytown, Texas on July
25, 1985, (the "Meeting "), at the designated meeting place,
and the roll was called of the duly constituted members of
the City Council, to -wit:
Emmett Hutto
Perry Simmons
Roy Fuller
Fred Philips
Jimmy Johnson
Gerald Dickens
Ron Embry
Mayor
Council Member
Council Member
Council Member
Council Member
Council Member
Council Member
All of such persons were present, except the following
absentees: Emmett Hutto , thus constituting a quorum.
Whereupon a written:
RESOLUTION APPROVING RESOLUTION OF
BAYTOWN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
CONCERNING ISSUANCE OF BONDS TO FINANCE A PROJECT FOR
RANDALL'S CENTER / BAYTOWN
(the "Resolution ") was duly
due discussion, said motion,
of the Resolution, prevailed
votes:
AYES: 5
moved and seconded and, after
carrying with it the adoption
and carried by the following
NOES: 1
2. A true, full and correct copy of the Resolution is
attached to and follows this Certificate; the Resolution has
been duly recorded in the minutes of the Meeting; the above
and foregoing paragraph is a true, full, and correct excerpt
from the minutes of the Meeting pertaining to the adoption
of the Resolution; the persons named in the above and fore-
going paragraph are the duly elected, qualified, and acting
members of the Court; each of such members was duly and
sufficiently notified officially and personally, in advance,
of the time, place, and purpose of the Meeting, and that the
Resolution would be introduced and considered for adoption
at the Meeting, and each of such members consented, in advance,
50725 -6
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 25, 1985
to the holding of the Meeting for such purpose; and the
Meeting was open to the public, and public notice of the
time, place, and purpose of the Meeting was given, all as
required by Article 6252 -17, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutues,
as amended.
SIGNED AND SEALED this a?5 day of July, 1985.
(see Page No. 9)
50725 -7
RESOLUTION NO. 919
RESOLUTION APPROVING RESOLUTION OF
BAYTOWN IAMUSTRIAL DEVELOPMEh7 CORPORATION
CONCERNING ISSUANCE OF BONDS TO FINANCE A PROJECT FOR
RANDALL'S CENTER /BAYTOWN
THE STATE OF TEXAS §
§
COUNTY OF HARRIS §
WHEREAS, the board of directors (the "Board ") of the Baytown Industrial
Development Corporation has, by a Resolution Concerning Issuance of Bonds to
Finance a Project for Randall's Center /Baytown, adopted July 25, 1985 (the
"Resolution "), agreed and declared its intent to issue its limited obligation
revenue bonds pursuant to the terms of the Development Corporation Act of
1979, Article 5190.6, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes, as amended (the "Act ")
and such other statutes as may provide authority therefor, to finance the
costs of the project and in the amount set forth in the Resolution for the
benefit of Randall's Center /Baytown, a Texas joint venture; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Baytown, Texas, finds and
declares that the action of the Board approving the Resolution should be
approved and is in the best interests of the inhabitants of the City of = .
Baytown, Texas, for the reasons therein set forth;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BAYTOWN, TEXAS, THAT:
Section 1: The Resolution, as adopted by the board, agreeing and
declaring an intent to issue limited obligation revenue bonds for the purposes
and in the amount set forth in the Resolution is hereby approved.
Section 2: This Resolution is adopted for the purpose of satisfying the
conditions and requirements of the Act and Section 103 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1954, as amended, and the regulations promulgated thereunder.
0785032
WP0494
50725 -8
INTRODUCED, READ, and PASSED by the affirmative vote of the City
Council of the City of Baytown, this the 25th day of July, 1985.
ATTEST:
2 �— r o I
EN P. HALL, City Jerk
APPROVED:
SAN ALL 8. S-TW(YNG ttorney
/
•
50725 -9
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 25, 1985
Consider Proposed Resolution No. 920, Approving Resolution
of Baytown Industrial Development Corporation Concerning
Issuance of Bonds to Finance a Project for Independent
Plaza III Partnership
This item will be discussed at a later meeting.
Consider Proposed Ordinance, Amending Chapter 7, "Buildings,"
to Delete Requirement for Portable Building, 240 Square
Feet or Less, to Have Building or Moving Permits Placement
Fee, Tie Down Requirements and Definition.
Presently, the requirement for persons who build a
portable building of 240 square feet is to get a building
permit, and the administration feels that for that type
structure that should not be necessary. If council elects
to adopt the proposed ordinance, the requirement for build-
ing permit for portable buildings of 240 square feet or
less will be eliminated; however, the individual will be
required to tie down the building properly and to place
the building properly. The requirement for building permit
is in the FHA requirements and when those were adopted by
reference, this provision was adopted. The placement fee
is $10.00.
Councilman Simmons pointed out that this fee is
probably not very realistic since the city would be sending
inspectors out.
The city manager suggested that perhaps all the fees
should be reviewed, and council concurred.
In response to council query, Mr. Lanham stated that
the ordinance would only apply to those buildings constructed
after adoption of the ordinance.
Councilman Philips moved for adoption of the ordinance;
Councilman Johnson seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons,
Embry and Dickens
Mayor
Nays: None
ORDINANCE NO. 4201
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN,
TEXAS, AMENDING CHAPTER 7, "BUILDINGS," SECTION 7 -4.1,
BUILDING CODE -- AMENDMENTS, BY ESTABLISHING AN EXCEPTION
FOR CERTAIN PORTABLE BUILDINGS FROM PERMITS; ESTABLSIHING
A PLACEMENT FEE AND TIE -DOWN REQUIREMENTS; REPEALING
CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; CONTAINING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND
PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF.
50725 -10
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 25, 1985
Consent Agenda
Council considered the consent agenda as follows:
a. Proposed Ordinance No. 50725 -2, will award bids
for the construction of the Republic of Texas
Plaza. Three bids were received. H. B. Hamilton
Construction submitted the low bid of $40,025.60.
We recommend the low bidder, H. B. Hamilton
Construction, be awarded this contract.
b. Proposed Ordinance No. 50725 -31 will award the bid
for trash pumps. Bids were mailed to eleven
vendors. Four proposals were received. This is a
two item bid. The low bidder meeting specifications
on both bids was Wacker Corporation. Wacker
Corporation submitted a bid of $3,592.
We recommend the low bidder, Wacker Corporation,
be awarded this contract.
c. Proposed Ordinance No. 50725 -4, will award the bid
for wall or cabinet mounted chlorinator. Bids
were mailed to six vendors and three bids were
received. Fischer & Porter submitted the low bid
of $3,955.
We recommend the low bidder, Fischer & Porter be
awarded this contract.
d. Proposed Ordinance No. 50725 -5, will award the bid
for the annual fill sand contract. Bids were sent
to four vendors and two responded. Baytown Sand &
Clay submitted the low bid in the amount of $17,250.
We recommend the low bidder, Baytown Sand & Clay,
be awarded this contract.
e. Proposed Ordinance No. 50725 -6, will award the bid
for Baker Street Well Pump Repair. Bids were
mailed to three vendors and three proposals were
received. Alsay Incorporated submitted the low
bid of $7,967.
We recommend the low bidder, Alsay Incorporated,
be awarded this contract.
f. Proposed Ordinance No. 50725 -7, will award the bid
for electrical service for public works garage.
Bids were mailed to 10 vendors and six proposals
were received. Bayport Electric, Inc. submitted
the low bid of $5,885.
We recommend the low bidder, Bayport Electric Inc.
be awarded this contract.
50725 -11
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 25, 1985
g. Proposed Ordinance No. 50725 -8, will award the bid
for the annual picnic catering service. Bids were
mailed to 12 vendors and five proposals were
received. The low bidder meeting specifications
is Royal Catering. Royal Catering submitted a bid
of $3,490.
We recommend the low bidder, Royal Catering, be
awarded this contract.
h. Proposed Ordinance No. 50725 -9, will approve
emergency sliplining in the Lakewood area. A
sanitary sewer cave -in occured on a major 12"
concrete sewer line last Wednesday at the intersection
of Lakewood Drive and Mayhaw Drive. Public Works
crews re- established flow Thursday evening and are
making routine inspections of this line to maintain
flows. The line has deteriorated badly since it
was repaired during the West District rehabilitation
project in 1982 to the extent that the most economical
repair procedure now is deemed to be sliplining.
Bids to perform the repair work were requested
from three contractors. Channel Construction
Company, Inc. submitted the low bid of $8,097.60.
We recommend the low bidder, Channel Construction
Company, Inc. be awarded this contract and that
they proceed with this work. Repairs are scheduled
to begin on Monday.
Councilman Dickens moved to adopt the Consent Agenda
Items a through h; Councilman Johnson seconded the motion.
The vote follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons,
Embry and Dickens
Mayor Pro Tempore Fuller
For bid tabulations, see Attachments "A" through "G."
ORDINANCE NO. 4202
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF H. B. HAMILTON CONSTRUC-
TION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF TEXAS PLAZA
ON NORTH MAIN STREET AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE
CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF FORTY THOUSAND TWENTY -FIVE
AND 60/100 ($40,025.60) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No.
50725 -2)
ORDINANCE NO. 4203
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF WACKER CORPORATION FOR
THE PURCHASE OF TRASH PUMPS AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT
BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF THREE THOUSAND FIVE
HUNDRED NINETY -TWO AND N01100 ($3,592.00) DOLLARS. (Pro-
posed Ordinance No. 50725 -3)
50725 -12
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 25, 1985
ORDINANCE NO. 4204
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF FISCHER AND PORTER COMPANY
FOR THE PURCHASE OF A WALL OR CABINET MOUNTED CHLORINATOR
AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE
SUM OF THREE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED FIFTY -FIVE AND N01100
($3,955.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 50725 -4)
ORDINANCE NO. 4205
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF BAYTOWN SAND AND CLAY
COMPANY FOR THE ANNUAL FILL SAND CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZING
THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY-OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF SEVENTEEN
THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED FIFTY AND NO 1100 ($17,250.00) DOLLARS.
(Proposed Ordinance No. 50725 -5)
ORDINANCE NO. 4206
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF ALSAY INCORPORATED FOR
REPAIRING THE BAKER STREET WELL PUMP AND AUTHORIZING THE
PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF SEVEN THOUSAND
NINE HUNDRED SIXTY -SEVEN AND N01100 ($7,967.00) DOLLARS.
(Proposed Ordinance No. 50725 -6)
ORDINANCE NO. 4207
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF BAYPORT ELECTRIC, INC. FOR
THE ELECTRICAL SERVICE FOR PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE AND AUTHOR-
IZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF FIVE
THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED EIGHTY -FIVE AND N01100 ($5,885.00)
DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 50725 -7)
ORDINANCE NO. 4208
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF ROYAL CATERING FOR THE
ANNUAL PICNIC CATERING SERVICE AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT
BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF THREE THOUSAND FOUR
HUNDRED NINETY AND N01100 ($3,490.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed
Ordinance No. 50725 -8)
ORDINANCE NO. 4209
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN,
TEXAS, DECLARING THAT AN EMERGENCY SITUATION EXISTS;
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT FOR
THE EMERGENCY SLIPLINING OF 482 FEET OF TWELVE INCH SEWER
LINE BETWEEN GREENBRIAR DRIVE AND THE INTERSECTION OF
LAKEWOOD DRIVE AND MAYHAW DRIVE; AND APPROVING PAYMENT OF
THE SUM OF EIGHT THOUSAND NINETY -SEVEN AND 60/100 ($8,097.60)
DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 50725 -9)
50725 -13
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 25, 1985
Consider Appointments to Mechanical Board
Appointments to this board will be made at a future
meeting.
Consider Appointments to Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
Appointments to this board will be made at a future
meeting.
Consider Appointments to Baytown Area Water Authority Board
Councilman Philips moved to reappoint Robert L. Gillette,
Dan Mundinger and A. S. Rome, Jr. to serve two -year terms
on the Baytown Area Water Authority Board; Councilman Embry
seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Simmons,
Embry and Dickens
Mayor Pro Tempore Fuller
Nays: None
City Manager's Report
Capital Improvements Program - At the last meeting,
the status of the capital improvements program was discussed.
In the discussion of the sanitary sewer portion of that,
the city manager had indicated that the administration
expected to know shortly if the EPA grant would be approved
and just a day or two after the meeting, the priority list
was received from the Department of Water Resources which
categorized the cities according to population. In
Baytown's population category, Baytown ranks Number 1. The
decision will be made on August 2 as to whether the city
will receive funding. The amount of that grant based on
the tentative numbers would be $4,400,000. Mr. Lanham had
also indicated at that meeting that there was money available
for the project in the bond fund along with monies paid in
for capital buy -in charges to pay the city's share; however,
he was mistaken. If this is the amount that is approved,
the city will not have nearly enough. The total amount of
the project is approximately $8,000,000. The funding is
55% EPA and 45% City of Baytown, but some of the improvements
are not eligible for funding. The project would be divided
into four phases with a possibility that two or more of
the phases would be out for bids at the same time.
Tentatively, the plan is to go out for bids in January
for the plant work which is the largest part of the project.
The total estimated cost of that is 5.6 million with the
local share being about 3.5 million. Therefore, an additional
2 million dollars in bond funds will be needed at that time.
50725 -14
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 25, 1985
Then in June, the engineers suggest that bids be taken on
the remaining three projects which would be collection
system rehabilitation, lift stations and diversion sewers.
The city's share of this project would be just under 1
million dollars with the total amount being 1.5 million
dollars. Therefore, the first half of 1986, the city
will need about 3 million dollars of additional bond
funds over and above what has already been sold and what
is on hand. The bonds have been authorized, but have
not been sold. Last January when bonds were sold, the
administration indicated that it would probably be necessary
to have another sale in early 1986.
Railroad Crossing Inspection - Periodically, the
administration inspects all railroad crossings in the city.
The crossings are rated with those in need of immediate
repair being ranked No. 1. Both railroad companies have
given the administration letters indicating when they
expect to start to work on these.
Council requested that the administration contact
the railroad companies concerning the painting of the old
railway station on Texas Avenue.
Flood Insurance - The administration was notified back
in May that in order for Baytown to remain eligible for
flood insurance, it would be necessary to revise the ordin-
ance. The legal staff has developed a draft of an ordinance
which was provided to council in the packet to alert council
that this is something that needs to be acted on at least
four weeks prior to November 15 to continue to be eligible
for flood insurance. Council was provided with a memorandum
from Bill Cornelius, Director of Planning and Traffic,
explaining the various changes. This item will be on a
future agenda.
1985 Street Improvement Program - The contractor has
finished work on North Burnet, Douglas, Homan and Honey-
suckle. The base is being installed on East Defee at Seventh.
Councilman Fuller mentioned that the cleanup work on
North Burnet is not completed.
Sidewalk Construction -
have been completed, and the
the Market Street sidewalk.
been completed.
Baker Road /Fairway sidewalks
contractor is well along on
The Lee Drive sidewalk has
Drainage Work - City crews are about 45% completed on
the Mockingbird /Clayton Street drainage project, and on
the Tenth Street Park /Detention area, the contractor is
95% complete. Most of the dirt that was to be hauled has
been and now it is a matter of shaping the area.
Council inquired if the contractor had placed any top
soil back down in the pond, and Mr. Lanham responded that
the administration may be coming back to council with a
change order in that regard. In a later contract the area
will be sodded.
50725 -15
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 25, 1985
Brownwood Cleanup Project - About 25% of the work has
been done on this project.
Sidewalk along Cedar Bayou Road from McKinney Road to
Cedar Bayou Junior School - The administration has developed
cost estimates on the possible installation of a sidewalk
along Cedar Bayou Road from McKinney Road to Cedar Bayou
Junior School. The city engineer suggested that two -24 inch
pipes be installed at an estimated cost of $42,000. The
major cost involved is not the sidewalk, but the drainage
work that would be necessary in order to install the sidewalk.
East District Sanitary Sewer - The contractor on the
East District Sanitary Sewer work is scheduled to begin work
on August 6.
Court case - Fair Labor Standards Act - The city
attorney explained that in 1976 the U. S. Supreme Court in a
case styled the National League of Cities vs Usury upheld
the Tenth Amendment grant of powers to the states, and held
that states were not subject to the Fair Labor Standards
Act. This was considered a major victory for states rights
at the time, but recently, the supreme court has reversed
itself by a 5 -4 vote, and in Garcia vs the San Antonio
Metropolitan Transit Authority, has taken the opposite
opinion. NIMLO has quoted Attorney General, Edwin Meese,
who has taken the position that the case is an inaccurate
reading of the text of the Constitution, and a disregard of
the framers intention that state and local government should
be a buffer against the centralizing tendencies of the
national government. Five justices denied that the Tenth
Amendment protects states from federal laws regulating the
wages and hours of state and local employees and went on to
say that this overruled their earlier decision. This causes
instability in the system, and this instability in decisions
concerning the fundamental principle of federalism does the
Constitution no service. This was a very troublesome case
for cities and other local government in that these entities
may no longer be exempt from the Fair Labor Standards Act.
Right now, the Secretary of Labor has not made a final
decision. He has the authority to decide if municipal
employees are exempt; however, the city attorney feels
reasonably certain that municipal employees will not be
exempt. This is a serious problem from the standpoint of
state rights, and it is also a problem from a financial
standpoint because the city will be required to pay overtime
in all situations. Compensatory time will be eliminated.
NIMLO has performed a fact survey and based on information
from 281 cities, the costs will be increased by over
$400,000,000 per year. Statistically applying that to all
municipalities throughout the country, NIMLO estimates that
it would cost this country over $5,000,000,000 per year
which does not include the cost of changing and keeping city
records. This is simply increased payroll costs. There-
fore, NIMLO's board has approved the filing of a lawsuit to
get a judgement saying due to the costs of the act, it
cannot constitutionally be applied to health, police, fire
and other essential local government functions. NIMLO has
hired Rex Lee to handle the lawsuit and is asking that
50725 -16
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 25, 1985
cities throughout the country participate in the lawsuit.
The estimated cost is over $400,000. A trust fund has been
established for participation by cities to finance the
lawsuit. For a city the size of Baytown, the suggested
contribution is $2,000. If the whole amount is not ex-
pended, Baytown will be reimbursed for our pro -rata share.
Councilman Philips stated that Lieutenant Governor
Hobby has gone to Washington to plead for a delay of this
and he felt that the whole matter is so huge in scope that
it would need to be handled more at a level of legislators.
Therefore, he felt that the matter would be resolved in that
manner.
The city attorney added that if the act remains, the
city could be liable for overtime back to April 15, 1985.
The labor department will begin enforcement on October 15.
Mayor Pro Tempore Fuller asked council to let the
administration know if they would like an item in this
regard on the next agenda.
Councilman Embry stated that he felt that Councilman
Philips had made a good point and that everyone should let
their representatives know how they feel about this. Failing
in that effort, it would be appropriate to consider joining
the litigation.
Councilman Philips stated that there would be a meeting
on August 21 in Dallas that he has considered attending;
Council had no objection.
Councilman Simmons stated that he would like to see
monies included in the budget to cleanup the bridges over
Goose Creek Stream at West Main Street and Park Street. He
felt that this would be appropriate since this next year is
the Sesquicentennial of Texas. Mr. Lanham stated that he
would get an estimate of the costs involved to present to
Council during the budget work sessions.
Recess Into Executive Session to Discuss Pending Litigation
and Land Acquisition:
Mayor Pro Tempore Fuller recessed the open meeting into
executive session to discuss pending litigation and land
acquisition. When the open meeting reconvened, the following
business was transacted:
Consider Proposed Ordinance, Authorizing the Administration
to Make Offers for and on Behalf of the City to the
Owner or Other Parties in Interest for the Acquisition
of Certain Property
Councilman Dickens moved to adopt the ordinance author-
izing the city manager to make an offer for Eighty Thousand
and No /100 ($80,000) Dollars to the U. S. Postal Service for
the acquisition of the old post office building on Defee;
Councilman Embry seconded the motion. The vote follows:
50725 -17
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 25, 1985
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons,
Embry and Dickens
Mayor Pro Tempore Fuller
Nays: None
ORDINANCE NO. 4210
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO MAKE AN OFFER
FOR AND IN BEHALF OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, FOR EIGHTY
THOUSAND AND N01100 ($80,000.00) DOLLARS TO THE U.S. POSTAL
SERVICE FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN INTERESTS IN A TRACT
DESCRIBED HEREIN REQUIRED FOR A PUBLIC PURPOSE; PROVIDING
FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF.
Consider Proposed Ordinance, Authorizing the City Attorney
to Make Offers for and on Behalf of the City of Baytown
for Purchase of Property in Brownwood; Requiring That
Such Offers be Accepted Within Fifteen (15) Days;
Directing the City Attorney to Institute Condemnation
Proceedings in the Event Such Offers are Refused
Councilman Dickens moved to adopt the proposed ordinance
authorizing the city attorney to make offers for Tract Nos.
1, 3 and 4; Councilman Simmons seconded the motion. The vote
follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons,
Embry and Dickens
Mayor Pro Tempore Fuller
Nays: None
ORDINANCE NO. 4211
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO MAKE OFFERS
FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN TO THE OWNERS OR
OTHER PARTIES IN INTEREST FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN
TRACTS DESCRIBED HEREIN REQUIRED FOR PARK PURPOSES; RE-
QUIRING THAT SUCH OFFERS BE ACCEPTED WITHIN FIFTEEN (15)
DAYS; DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO INSTITUTE CONDEMNATION
PROCEEDINGS IN THE EVENT SUCH OFFERS ARE REFUSED; AND
PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF.
Adjourn
There being no further business to be transacted,
the meeting was adjourned.
— , &_, �'.. P g�' � -
Eileen P. Hall, City Clerk
Attachment "A"
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
BUSCH, HUTCHISON & ASSOCIATES, INC. AND ARCHITECTS
1 107 FLEETWOOD DRIVE • BAYTOWN. TEXAS 77320 • PHONE (7131422-8213
3333 EASTSIDE. SUITE 268 • HOUSTON. TEXAS 77098 • 17131 323.2367
July 17, 1985
Honorable Mayor & City Council
City of Baytown
P. 0. Box 424
Baytown, Texas 77522
Gentlemen:
On Tuesday, July 16, 1985, bids were opened at City Hall for construction of
the Republic of Texas Plaza on North Main Street. The following bids were
received and opened:
H. B. Hamilton Construction - $40,025.60
Angel Brothers Ent., Inc. - $43,200.00
Beyer- Schindewolf Construction - $72,668.50
It is our recommendation after reviewing all bids that the contract be awarded
to the low bidder, H. B. Hamilton Construction.
Sincerely,
David L. Black, P. E.
DLB /aa
CITY OF BAYTOWN
BID TABULATION
TITLE: TRASH PUMPS
BID NUMBER: #18505 -85
DATE: 7 -9 -85 2:00 P.M.
Attachment "B"
9
1
I
I
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
WACKER CORPORATION ;
F. W. GARTNER CO._1
ITEM
1 QTY 1
UNIT 1
DESCRIPTION
;
I 1
1 1
1
1
I
1
1
I
1
1
!UNIT PRICE;EXT. PRICEIUNIT
PRICE;EXT. PRICE'
1 1
1 2 1
EACH !
3" TRASH PUMP,
1
914.55 1$
1,829.101
1,024.001;
2,048.00'
1
1 !
1
per specifications.
1
1
1
1
1
1
! 2
1 1
! 1 1
1
EACH 1
411 TRASH PUMP,
=
1
1
1$
1
1,763.441
1
1$
1
2,969.001
per specifications.
MAKE:
!
WACKER !
1
CARTER 1
-. 1
TOTAL:
1
1$
3,592.541
!$
5,017.001
'
1 !
1
DELIVERY:
1
3 DAYS 1
1
30 DAYS 1
1
SPECIAL CONDITION:
1
1
1
1
1
9
1
I
I
I
1
1
1
1
I
,1
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
1 I
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I 1
1 1
1
1
I
1
1
I
1
1
1 I
I
,1
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
1 I
1 1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1 1
1 1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
I
1
1
1
1
I 1
1 1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
:T- TRASH PUMPS
IO NUMBER: #8505 -85
4TE: 7 -9 -85
2:00 P.M.
CITY OF BAYTOWN
BID TABULATION
PAGE 2
DELIVERY:
SPECIAL CONDITION:
1
1
i
1
1
1
I 1 1 1
1 1 1
30 DAYS ; ; 30 DAYS
'DOES NOT MEET SPECS;
ON OIL ALERT SHUT- ;
OFF d DISCHARGE
CAPACITY. i
1
1 I
ACNE PUMV
&
WMLrl� i runr &
rUWMK QWuir i
ITEM 1 QTY
1 UNIT
1 DESCRIPTION
1
I
1
1 1
1 1
;UNIT PRICE;EXT.
PRICE;UNIT PRICE;EXT. PRICE;
1 ; 2
; EACH
; 3" TRASH PUMP,
; 884.00
;$
1,768.00; 1,024.001$
2,048.00;
per specifications.
2 ; 1
EACH
11 4" TRASH PUMP,
;
;$
2,262.00;
;$
2,969.00;
it
per specifications.
i
i
i
1
1
- IGar••an-
1-
MAKE:
i
i
i �yBP
TOTAL:
;
;$
4,030.00;
;$
5,796:00;
DELIVERY:
SPECIAL CONDITION:
1
1
i
1
1
1
I 1 1 1
1 1 1
30 DAYS ; ; 30 DAYS
'DOES NOT MEET SPECS;
ON OIL ALERT SHUT- ;
OFF d DISCHARGE
CAPACITY. i
1
1 I
1 I
1
1 1
1
I
1
1 1
1 1
Attachment "C"
CITY OF BAYTOWN
BID TABULATION
TLE: NAIL OR CABINET MOUNTED CHLORINATOR
0 NUMBER: f6506 -86
TE: 1 -10 -85 1:00 P.M.
INCHLOR SERVICES INC; FISCHER t PORTER ; MACAULAY CONTROLS
TEM; QTY ;UNIT ;DESCRIPTION
1 I NUTT PQICF!FYT_ PRICF!ONIT PRICF!EXT. PRICE!UNIT PRICE!EXT. PRICElUNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICE;
NAIL OR CABINET
;
;f 81875.00;
;f 3.955.00;
;f 9,000.00;
MOUNTED CHLORIHATORt
per specifications.
,
MODEL:
; FISCHER t PORTER
; FISCHER t PORTER
; WALLACE t TIERNAN
;
WARRANTY:
; 11
MONTHS;
; 12 MONTHS;
; 12
MONTHS;
DELIVERY:
; 60
DAYS ARO
; 6 -8 WEEKS ARO
; 90
DAYS ARO
s
;
;
CITY OF BAYTOWN
BID TABULATION
LE:` ANNUAL FILL SAND CONTRACT
I NUMBER: 18506 -91
7 -10 -85 1:00 P.K.
Attachment "D"
BAYTOWN SAND A CLAY ; RIGHT WAY
SAND
COMP ;
0
i €MI QTY
lUNIT
',DESCRIPTION
i
;UNIT PRICEIEXT PRICE' UNIT PRICE;EXT.
PRICE;UNIT
PRICElEXT.
PRICEiUNIT
PRICE;EXT.
PRICE;
1 ;5000
; YDS
; ANNUAL FILL SAND CONT.
; 3.15 /YD ; ;55.20/ ; 3.15 /YD
per specifications.
LOAD
0
DELIVERY:
1/2 DAY ARO ANY DAY
ARO
TOTAL:
1117,250.00
��18,750.00�
i
i
i
i
CITY OF BAYTOWN
BID TABULATION
;TLE: BAKER STREET WELL PUMP REPAIRS
1 NUMBER: 18506 -92
iTE: 7 -11 -85 2:00 P.K.
Attachment "E"
1 ;
; ; 0
0 ; ;
,
,
,
,
;
,
,
,
LAYNE TEXAS CO.
;
LAYNE WESTERN
;
ALSAY INCORPORATED
;
ITEM;
QTT ;UNIT
;DESCRIPTION
;UNIT
PRICEIEXT. PRICE,UNIT
PRICU EXT. PRICEIUNIT
PRICEIEXT. PRICEIUNIt
PRICE;EXT.
PRICEI
1 1
1 1 LOT
1 BAKER STREET WELL PUMP
1
IS 8,270.00;
IS 8,532.003
7,967.00;
1
1
1 REPAIRS,
;
;
;
1
;
1
per specifications.
,
,
,
,
,
i
,
,
, ,
1
1 DELIVERY:
1 15
CALENDAR DAYS
1
15 CALENDAR DAYS
1
15 CALENDAR DAYS
1
1
1
1 ;
; ; 0
0 ; ;
,
,
,
,
;
,
,
,
Attachment "F"
CITY OF BAYTOWN
810 TABULATION
'LE: ELECTRIC SERVICE FOR PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE
I NUMBER: 18506 -93
7 -12 -85 2:00 P.N.
PFEIFFER
ELECTRIC CO! GULF
COAST
ELECTRIC ; WHITLEY ELECTRIC
; RAPES
ELECTRIC
;
BEM; QTY
;UNIT
;DESCRIPTION
;UNIT PRICE!EXT
PRICE;UHIT
PRICE!EXT.
PRICE,UHIt
PRICE;EXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICE;EXT.
PRICE;
t
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 ;
I
; LOT
1
; ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO
;
;=10,585.00;
is
81215.00;
;= 6,762.00;
is 6,250.43;
PUBLIC FORKS GARAGE,
;
;
11
;
11
1
per speciflcatlons.
;
;
;
i
;
DELIVERY:
;
; 10
DAYS ;
;
10 DAYS ;
i.10 DAYS
;
; 10
DAYS ;
1
1
1
1
t
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
t
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
t
I
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
I
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
I
1
t
I
1
1
Y
1
1
I
t
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
I
I
1
1
t
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
1
1
1
I
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
t
1
I
I
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
r
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
1
1
I
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
t
1
t
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
I
I
I
1
1
1
I
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
I
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
t
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
t
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
t
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
CITY OF BAYTOWN
PAGE 2
810 TABULATION
TITLE: ELECTRIC SERVICE FOR PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE
ILO NUMBER: 18506 -93
IATE: I -12 -85 2:00 P.M.
H Ii
H ELECTRIC
CO. 1 BAYPORT ELECTRIC INC1
;
;ITEM; QTY
;UNIT
;DESCRIPTION
;
;UNIT
PRICE;EXT.
PRICE,
PRICE;EXT. PRICE;UNIT
PRICEIEXT.
PRICEIUNIT
PRICEIEXT.
PRICE,
I�1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
(
1
1-
1 ;
; LOT
1 ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO
;
;= 6,
49.851
1$ 5,885.001
1 1
1
1 PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE,
1 1
1
1
per specifications.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1 t
I
I
I
I
1
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1 DELIVERY:
1
1 5
DAYS 1
i 10 DAYS 1
1 1
1
I
1
1
1
1 1
1
I
I
I
1 1
1
I
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1•
1
1
I 1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1
1 1
1 I
1
1
I
1
1
1
1 1
I
1
1
1
I
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1 1
I
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I S
1
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
I
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
t
1 1
1 1
1
1
1
1
I
I
1
I
I
1
1
1 1
t
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
CITY Of BAYTOWN
810 TABULATION
TLE: ANNUAL PICNIC CATERING SERVICE
0 NUMBER: 18506 -87
TTE: 7 -11 -85 2:00 P.M.
Attachment "G"
CATERING BY LYNETTE 1 LENOX BBQ i CATERING; ROYAL CATERING ; DEMERIS BARBQUE ;
TEN! QTY !UNIT !DESCRIPTION
!UNIT PRICE:EXT. PRICE:UNIT PRICE!EXT. PRICE :UNIT PRICE:EXT. PRICE :UNIT PRICE :EXT. PRICE!
l 11000 1 EA ! ANNUAL PICNIC CATERING 1 3.50 Is 3,500.001 3.65 1= 3,650.001 3.49 Ii 3,490.001 3.50 is 3,500.001
' ' ' SERVICE It ' ' ' ' ' ' ' Is
per specifications.
2 ! 1 1 ALTERNATE: per specs. 1 IS 31001.00! 1 =2,117.00 1 3 21640.001 1; 4,475.501
1 ! ! DELIVERY: 1 9-13 -BS 1 1 9 -13 -85 1 1 1 1 ! !
! 1 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
CITY OF BAYTOWN
810 TABULATION
ITLE: ANNUAL PICNIC CATERING SERVICE
NUMBER: 18506 -87
ATE: 7 -II -85 2:00 P.M.
PAGE 2
t
,
,
i
i
,
,
,
,
, t
t
,
,
i
i
i
i
,
i
TON PIERCE BBQ I*CATI
ITEM: QTY
!UNIT
jOESCRIPTION
;
;
;UNIT PRICE!
XT. PRICE;UNIT
PRICE;EXT.
PRICEIUNIT
PRICE,'EXT.
PRICE;UNIT
PRICEIEXT.
PRICE;
_;
1 11000
; EA
; ANNUAL PICNIC CATERING
14.20JCAKE
;s 4,200.00;
1
1
1 SERVICE,
14.451
is 4,450.001
per specifications.
; COBBLER
; 11
i
0
1 ;
;
; ALTERNATE: per specs.
;
;s 7,447.50;
t
,
,
i
i
,
,
,
,
, t
t
,
,
i
i
i
i
,
i
Attachment "A"
CITY OF BAYTOWN
610 TABULATION
ITLE: ANNUAL CAST IRON CASTINGS CONTRACT
NUMBER: 18506 -95
ATE: 7 -17 -85 2:00 P.M.
0
I
1
; UTILITY SUPPLY COMP '
GOLDEN TRIANGLE PIPE; TECH
SALES
; WHITE SUPPLY
=
ITEM; QTY
;UNIT
;DESCRIPTION
;UNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICEIUNIT PRiCEIIEXT. PRICE;UKIT PRICE;EXT. PRICEIUNIT
PRICE;EX7.
PRICES
ANNUAL CAST IRON CASTING;
; ;
; ;
;
_
; NO
BID ;
CONTRACT,
per specifications.
;
s
,
Adjustable Valve Box
; 1$ 1,792.001
1$ 2,255.201
1$
2,040.001
2a
1
1
1
Manhole Covers
; 1 2,760.001
1 1,714.401
1
NO BID I
=
1
b
1
1
'
Manhole Casting i Cover
1 1 81800.00;
1 7,441.501
1
1
1
;
C
1
1
1
Rectangular Grate Casting
1 1,350.001
1 19230.801
1
1
1
1
>< Open Cover
, I 11
,
, �
,
�
1
I
1
Total Item J2:
1 1$12,910.001
1310,386.701
1
1
1
1
; It
; ;
;
•3
1
1
;
Sever Cleanouts —
1 ;3 900.001
;3 990.001
;3
1,185.001
1
1
, ,
, ,
,
,
Exxon Type Inlet Casting'
;3 6,120.001
1$ 5,536.801
1
NO BID I
1
1
1
1
1
6 Inlet Grate Covers
1 1 1
1
, , ,
,
1
I
1
TOTAL BID:
1 1$21,722.001
1319,168.701
1$
3,225.001
1
1
WARRANTY:
1 BY MANUFACTURER 1
1 YEAR 1
DELIVERY:
1 10 DAYS ARO 1
10 DAY 1 110 -1S
DAYS!
SUPPLY POINT:
1 HOUSTON, TEXAS 1
BEAUMONT, TEXAS !WACO,
TEXAS
1
1
1
,
CITY OF BAYTOWN
PAGE 2
BID TABULATION
'ITLE: ANNUAL CAST IRON CASTINGS CONTRACT
IIO NUMBER: JOS06 -95
►ATE: 7 -17 -85 2:00 P.M.
i
1
I
1
MUNICIPAL PIPE 1
AQUA UTILITY SUPPLY 1
i
;ITEM', QTY
',UNIT
;DESCRIPTION
',UNIT PRICE;EXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICE;EXT. PRICEIUHIT
PRICEIEXT.
PRICEIUNIT
PRICEIEXT.
PRICE',
I
I
i
I
1 1
1 1
11
I
I
I
i
i
i
1
ANNUAL CAST IRON CASTING',
CONTRACT, i
I
I
I
per specifications. 1
I
I I
I
I
I
I
i
1 1
i
1
i
1
i
1
i
Adjustable Valve Box 1
i I
1; 1,913.601
i i
is 1,920.001
1
1
1
1
i 2a
I
i
I
Manhole Covers 1
1 1,794.001
1 2,560.001
1 b
1
1
1
Manhole Casting 3 Cover 1
1 7,791.251
1 6,900.001
1
1
1
I
1 c
1
1
',
Rectangular Grate Casting
1 1,209.601
', NO BID 1
I Open Cover
I
1
1
1
Total Item #2: 1
1 ;10,794.851
1; 9,460.001
1
1
I
I
1 3
1
1
1
Sever Cleanouts 1
1; 810.00',
IS 870.001
1 4
I
1
1
Exxon Type Inlet Casting)
" 11,448.001
is 4,248.001
I
I Inlet Grate Covers 1
1 I
I I
I
I
I
I
s
I
i
1
I
1
i
1
I
TOTAL BID: 1
I I
1 ;24,966.451
It
1 =16,498.001
I
I
I
i
f
I
i I
i
i
I
I
I
1
1
1
WARRANTY: 1
BY MANUFACTURER ',
BY MANUFACTURER
I
1
1
1
DELIVERY: 1
STOCK TO 10 DAYS 1
STOCK - 30 DAYS 1
s
1
I
I
I
=
I
1
i
1
I
1
I
SUPPLY POINT: ',
I 1
HOUSTON, TEXAS 1
1 1
HOUSTON, TEXAS
I
1
I
1
I
s
I
I
I
I s
I I
1
I
I
I
'
s
s s
i
i
i
s
i
i
i
i
s i
i
CITY OF BAYTOWN
810 TABULATION
ITLE: ANNUAL TIRE AND TUBE CONTRACT
ID NUMBER: 18506 -94
IATE: 7-17 -85 2:00 P.K.
W
Attachment "B"
!
1
1
1 GOODYEAR
CENTER = A-Z TIRE i
BATTERY 1
GENERAL
TIRE 1
B.F. GOODRICH ;
ITEM!
QTY
!UNIT
!DESCRIPTION
1
1
1
1
1
!UNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICEIUNIT
PRICEIEXT.
PRICEIUNIT PRICE
:EXT. PRICE:
!
1
! ANNUAL TIRE AND TUBE
1
1 1
! !
! 1
1 !
1
1
! CONTRACT, per
! 1
! !
1 i
1 1
1
1
1 specifications.
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
It 1
1
1
!
!
! !
1 !
! 1
It !
1
: SECTION l: POLICE TIRES
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1!
l0
1
! 195- 75RI4WSW
1 37.76
it 377.60!
! 1
1 1
1 1
1 2
1
75
1
1 225/70 R15
1 39.99
1 2,999.251
1 1
1 1
1 It
3
1
50
1
1 135/70 R15
1 41.01
1 2,050.501
! !
1 !
1 1
1
1
! TOTAL SECTION 1:
1
1'$ 5.427.351
1 NO 810 !
1 NO BID 1
1 NO BID 1
1
1
: SECTION II: TRUCK TIRES
1
1 !
1 !
! !
! !
1
1
1 AND TUBES
1
1 1
1 !
1 1
! !
4
:
8
1
! LT215/85 R16D
1 65.94
1 527.521
77.72
1 621.761
65.94
1 527321
62.31
1 498.48!
5
:
l0
1
! 7.0014
1 28.53
1 285.301
42.61
1 426.101
2833
' 285.30
33.89
1 338.901
6
:
30
1
1 225170 RIS
1 34.85
1 1.045.50:
42.45
1 11273.501
38.30
1 1,149.001
45.33
1 1,359.901
7
!
54
1
1 670 X 15
1 31.17
1 1,683.18!
37.33
1 2,015.821
31.17
1 1,683.18
1 NO BID 1
1 8
1
4
1
1 700 X 14
1 30.14
1 120.561
41.61
1 170.441
28.53
1 114.12!
33.89
1 135.561
9
1
15
1
1 700 X 15
1 38.82
1 582.301
38.95
1 584.251
34.58
! 518.701
41.44
it 621.6011
110
1
50
11
1 750 X 16 6 PLY
1 38.35
1 1,917.501
49.06
1 2,453.001
38.35
1 1,917.50
48.32
1 2,416.001
111
1
32
1
1 750 X 16 8 PLY
1 43.74
1 1,399.661
49.06
1 1,569.921
43.74
1 1,399.68'
49.14
1 1,512.461
111
1
10
1
1 800 X 16.5
1 35.94
1 359.401
55.07
1 550.701
35.94
1 359.401
42.85
1 428.501
113
1-20
1
1 Ill -16SL
1 73.67
1 1,473.401
53.63
1 1.072.60!
130.84:
2,616.8011
'75.56
1 1,511.20:
114
:
20
1
1 900 X 20
1 94.30
1 1,886.001
103.75
1 2,075.001
93.39
1 1,867.80:
112.46
1 1,249.60!
115
1
60
It
1 1000 X 20
1 125.27
1 7,516.201
122.14
1 7.328.401
134.06
1 7,443.601
135.42
1 8,125.201
116
1
60
1
1 1100 X 20
1 136.86
1 8,211.601
128.87
1 7,732.20
135.53
1 8,131.801
143.78
1 8,616.801
117
1
10
1
1 1300 X 14
1 199.31
1 1,993.101
201.96
1 2,019.60:
199.31
it 1,993.10;
236.96
1 2,369.60!
116
!
12
1
1 13.6 -28R4
: 132.04
1 1,584.48;
1 NO BID 1
188.32
It 2,259.841
192.57
1 1,310.841
119
1
12
It
1 14.9 -2484
1 140.13
: 1,681.561
195.61
it 2,347.3211
210.71
1 2,528.521
161.99
1 1,943.88:
120
!
11
1
it 17.51 -24R4
1 203.04
1, 2,436.48:
219.73
1 2,636.761
304.09
1 31649.081
232.58
1 2,790.961
121
1
12
1
1 16.9 -24R4
it 189.11
21 ,270.52:
216.75
of 2,601.00:
262.44
1 3,149.28!
205.57
of 2,466.841
122
!
12
1
It 16.9 -30R1
1 205.51
1 2,466.121
208.45
1 1,501.401
165.00
1 3,180.001
199.22
1 2_ 390.641
123
!
4
1
1 P155 X BOR13
1 22.88
1 91.521
28.01
1 112.041
25.64
1 102.561
30.77
1 123.081
124
1
4
1
1 8- 14.5LT
1 46.36
1 185.521
57.55
1 230.101
39.14
1 156.56!
65.19
1 260.761
125
1
6
1
1 LT235 -85R16
1 76.21
1 457.261
81.79
1 490.741
76.21
1 457.261
71.85
1 431.10;
126
1
6
1
1 950- 16.51.1
1 45.66
1 365.441
62.26
1 498.081
45.68
1 365.441
53.43
1 427:441
121
1
8
1
1 6.75- 16.5LT
1 42.27
1 338.1611
53.80
11 454.401
42.27
1 338.161
46.84
1 390.721
128
' 4
1
1 16.9 -28RI
1 185.75
1 743.00:
188.01
1 752.081
246.86
1 987.441
215.26
1 861.121
129
4
1
1 18.4 -30R1
1 216.82
1 867.28;
224.57
1 898.281
306.25
1 1,225.001
278.06
1 1,112.241
130
1
8
1
1 6.50 -6LT
1 29.44
1 235.521
37.07
1 296.561
29.17
1 233.361
38.70
1 309.601
:31
!
1
1
1 6.12R4TR
1 15.09
18 15.091
24.66
1 24.661
31.27
1 31.271
40.00
1 40.00!
TOTAL SECTION 11
1
1$42,739.191
:143,736.811
1:48,671.271
1146,113.041
1
,
GRAND TOTAL:
:
348,166.5411
1$43,736.811
1$48,671.27:
1146,113.04:
:
:
:
: SPECIAL CONDITION:
1 Prices are
tire prices
only.
We have solicited tube
prices too.
The tire
prices :sere!
determined
by delivery.
, ,
, ,
It ,
, ,
BRAND:
I GOODYEAR
1 :SUKKIT, UNITED,
HAT'L:
GEN. ARKSTRONG, KELLY
1
I
1
1 DELIVERY:
1 20 DAYS
ARO :3
DAYS ARO:
1
5 DAYS ARO :
! !
CITY OF BAYTOWN
BID TABULATION
ITLE: ANNUAL TIRE AND TUBE CONTRACT
10 NUMBER: 18506 -94
ATE: 7 -17 -85 2:00 P.M.
page 2
I
!
1
1 FULLER TIRE
I
1
I
1
ITEM! QTY
!UNIT
!DESCRIPTION
I
i
!
i
I
!UNIT
PRICEIEXT.
PRICEIUNIT
PRICEIEXT.
PRICElUNIT
PRICEIEXT.
PRICEIUNIT
PRICEIEXT.
PRICEI
1
1
I ANNUAL TIRE AND TUBE
1
!
1
1
1
1
I
1
!
1
!
! CONTRACT, per
1
1 NO
BID
1
1
! specifications.
!
I
! SECTION 1: POLICE TIRES
l
1 10
!
! 195- 75RI4WSV
2
1 75
1
! 225/70 R15
3
! 50
I
! 235/70 RI5
1
1
! TOTAL SECTION 1:
1
!
! SECTION II: TRUCK TIRES
!
1
! AND TUBES
4
! 8
!
! LT215/85 R16D
5
! 10
!
1 7.0014
6
! 30
!
1 225/70 RI5
;7
154
!
! 670X15
!
!
!
!
I
!
!
!
!
1 8
1 4
1
! 700 X 14
9!
15
I
! 700 X 15
l0
150
I
! 750 X 16 6 PLY
ll
r 32
I
1 750 X 16 6 PLY
112
110
1
1800X16.5
113
1 10
1
! ill -16SL
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
114
1 20
1
1 900 X 20
115
1 60
I
1 1000 X 20
I
i
1
!
I
!
I
!
!
116
1 60
1
1 1100 X 20
!
i
i
!
I
I
!
!
!
ill
1 10
Is
1300 X 24
118
! 12
I
! 13.6 -28R4
119
1 12
I
1 14.9 -24R4
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
120
112
I
1 I7.5L -24R4
!
!
I
i
I
!
!
!
!
121
1 12
1
1 16.9 -14R4
!
!
!
!
I
!
!
!
!
122
111
1
1 16.9 -30R1
I
!
I
!
!
!
I
!
I
123
1 4
1
1 P155 X BOR13
!
I
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
124
1 4
!
1 8- 14.5LT
!
125
1 6
1
1 LT235-85RI6
!
!26
1 8
1
1 950- 16.5LT
!
!
It
127
1 8
1
1 8.7S- 16.5LT
I
i
It
128
! 4
!
1 16.9 -18R1
!
i
i
i
!
!
!
i
!
!29
i 4
1
1 18.4 -30R1
i
It
1
!
!
i
i
!
!
130
1 8!
! 6.50 -61.1
!
1
I
!
I
i
I
!
1
!3l
! 1
!
1 6.12R47R
CITY OF BASTOVN
BID TABULATI01
ILE: ANNUAL SAFETY EQUIPBENT CONTRACT
D NOSIER: 8507 -103
TEt 7 -30 -85 2:00 P.B.
Attachment "C"
I I
BISSISSIPPI
TOOL 1
SEA LEVEL SUPPLI I
SOUTHVEST
GLOVE 1
BOBILE IND.
SAFETI
TEII
qTT (UNIT
IDESCQIPTIO1 I
1
(
I
I
I
1UNIT PRICEIEIT.
I I
PRICEIUNIT PYICEIEIT.
I i
PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEIT.
I I
PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEIT.
I I
PRICEY
I 1
I
I i
I ANNUAL SAFETY EQUIPIENT I
I
(
I I
I I
1
I
I I
I CONTRACT, per I
I
I
I I
I I
I
I
I I
I specifications. I
I
I
I
I I
i i
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
la
1 I
1 345 1
I I
1 Jacket Ii Pants 1
7.95
I
1
2,742.751
: 4.72
1 1,628.401
8.40
1 2,898.001
7.99
1
2,756.551
lb
1 345 1
1 Boots 1
10.20
1
3,519.001
8.83
1 3,046.351
9.53
1 3,287.851
9.49
1
3,274.051
1
1 TOTAL ITEB #1 1
1$
6,261.751
1$ 4,674.151
1$ 6,185.851
1$
6,030.601
2a
1 100 1
1 Bard Bats, include 1
5.98
1
598.001
5.66
1 $66.001
1 1
5.99
1
599.001
I 1
1 ratchet w/o Isprint I
1
I
I I
1 I
I
I
2b
1 300 1
1 Ratchets 1
4.95
1
11485.001
1 90 BID 1
1 1
3.29
1
987.001
2c
1 50 1
I BURP Caps 1
3.51
1
175.501
3.00
1 150.001
( 1
1.69
1
134.501
2d
1 110 1
1 Vinter Liners 1
2.95
1
354.001
1.21
1 145.201
I 1
2.49
1
298.801
1 I
I TOTAL ITEN #2 1
1$
:,611.501
1$ 861.201
1$ NO BID 1
1$
2,019.301
31
1 SO (
1 Ventilation Goggles 1
1.55
1
17.501
1.85
1 91.501
1 1
1.39
1
119.501
3b
1 15 1
1 Vent. i Anti- Splash Gog.1
2.10
1
67.501
1.16
1 54.001
I I
2.79
1
69.751
3c
1 300 1
1 Anti- Splasb Goggles 1
2.60
1
760.001
2.25
1 675.001
I 1
1
NO BID I
3d
1 100 I
I Eye Glasses 1
3.98
1
398.001
8.85
1 865.001
1 1
6.99
1
699.001
3e
1 100 1
1 Side Prot. Eye Glasses 1
3.92
1
392.001
3.38
1 338.001
1 1
2.39
1
239.001
if
1 600 1
1 Ear Plugs 1
.17
1
102.001
.16
1 96.001
1 1
.13
1
76.001
It
1 20 1
1 Head gear 1
5.76
1
115.101
1 NO BID I
I I
I
NO BID I
3h
1 40 1
1 Face Sbeilds 1
1.90
1
76.001
3.46
1 138.401
I 1
1.39
1
95.601
1 1
1 TOTAL ITEI #3 1
1$
2,008.201
1$ 2,178.901
IS NO BID 1
1$
11300.851
41
( 100 1
1 Safety Vest: Slip Over 1
4.36
1
436.001
3.25
1 325.001
1 1
1
NO BID I
4b
( 200 1
1 Safety Vest: Vest Style 1
4.46
1
892.001=2
3.40
1 680.001
1 1
3.79
1
756.001
I 1
1 TOTAL ME #4 1
1$
1,328.001
1$ 1,005.001
is NO BID 1
1$
758.001
Sa
1 200 1
1 Safety Flags - 1
1.35
1
210.001
1.27
1 254.001
1 1
1.39
1
178.001
Sb
1 S00 1
I Safety Cone -w /o iaprintl
3.95
1
1,915.001
3.23
1 1,615.001
1 1
4.29
1
2,145.001
Sc
1 100 1
1 Safety Cone - x/laprint 1
4.20
1
420.001
3.50
1 350.001
1 1
1
NO BID I
I I
I TOTAL ITEI #5 1
1$
2,665.001
1$ 2,219.001
1$ NO BID 1
1$
2,423.001
6a
11000 1
1 lark cloves 1
1.10
1
1,100.001
1.34
1 1,340.001
1.10
1 1,200.001
1.39
1
1,390.001
6b
1 100 1
1 Heavy Rubber Clove 1
1.50
1
1SO.001
I NO BID 1
1.10
1 120.001
1.59
1
159.001
6c
1 100 1
1 Light Rubber Glove 1
2.25
1
215.001
1 NO BID 1
1.43
1 143.001
1
NO BID I
6d
I SO I
I Driving clove I
3.25
1
162.501
1 NO BID 1
2.35
1 117.501
1
174.501
6e
1 200 1
1 Knit lark Glove 1
1.25
1
250.001
1 NO BID 1
.31
1 62.001
1
158.001
6f
1 40 1
1 Velders Clove 1
4.00
1
160.001
1 NO BID 1
3.82
1 152.801
1
179.601
1 TOTAL ITEI 16 1
I$
2,047.501
1$ 1,340.001
1$ 1,795.301
1$
2,061.101
I
I I
I I
I GRAND IOTAL: I
I
1$16j912.951
I
l I
1$12,378.851
I I
is 11981.151
I I
1$14,592.851
I
I SPECIAL CONDITION: I
I
I'Does
not
have color I
I I
I
I
I I
I (
I
I
fast zipper, the hood
i I
I
I
I I
I I
I
I
is detachable. I
1 I
I
I
I I
I I
I
1
"Vest is
lade of I
I 1
I
I
I I
I I
I
I
plastic sesh not I
I I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
nylon.
I I
I I
I I
I (
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I (
I
I
I
I
CITI OF BAYTOWN
BID TABULATION
TLE: ANNUAL SAFETI EQUIPSENT CONTRACT
D Nunn: 8507 -103
U: 7 -30 -65 2:00 P.H.
page 2
I I I I THE GLOVE COSPANI I EINCO INC. ! GROVES IND. SUPPLI ! TACEBERRI COSPANI I
7ES1 QTI (UNIT IDESCRIPTION I I I I I
I
I
I
1 I
I ANNUAL SAFETI EQUIPAENT !
I I
I I
I I
I I
i
I
i I I
I I NO BID {
i
I
I CONTRACT, per I
I I
I I
I
I I I
I
I
I specifications. 1
I I
I I
1 I
I I
I
I
I I I
1 I i
la
I I
1 345 1
I I
1 Jacket R Pants {
7.12
1 11456.401 *
6.41
I 2,211.451
{
I I I
lb
{ 345 1
( Boots (
10.12
1 30491.401
9.40
1 3,242.001
1
( ( I
I I
I TOTAL ITEN 11 (
IS 5,941.801
1$ 5.953.9S1
IS
NO BID
2a
( 100 1
1 Hard Hats, include 1
5.OS
1 505.001
S.13
I 573.001
I
I I I
I I
I ratchet w/o iaprint I
I I
I I
I
I I I
2b
1 300 1
1 Ratchets I
3.60
1 1,080.001
4.29
1 1,287.001
I
I ( I
2c
1 50 1
1 Bnmp Caps i
2.49
1 114.501
2.35
1 117.501
I
I 1 I
2d
1 120 I
( linter Liners 1
1.87
1 224.401
2.09
I 250.801
I I
I TOTAL ITEN #2 I
1�$ ,933.901
1$ 11228.301
1$
10 BID
3a
( SO I
I Ventilation 6oaales. 1
1.72
i B6.001
2.21
1 110.501
1.63
1
81.501 I 1
3b
1 2S I
I Vent. I Anti - Splash 601.1
1.99
( 49.75!
2.56
1 64.001
1.95
1
48.751 I I
3c
1 300 1
1 Anti - Splash Goggles 1
2.77
1 831.001
2.96
1 868.001
1.9S
1
585.001 I
3d
1 100 1
1 Eye Classes I
6.08
1 608.001
5.19
1 519.001*
2.83
1
283.001 I I
3e
1 100 1
1. Side Prot. Eye Classes {
1.88
{ 188.001
3.OS
I 305.001
3.04
1
304.001 I I
3f
1 600 1
) Ear Plugs I
.12
I 72.001
.14
1 84.001
.15
1
90.001 I
31
1 20 1
( Head fear (
4.43
I 98.601
4.78
1 95.601
3.88
1
17.601 I 1
3h
1 40 1
1 Face Sheilds (
1.38
( S5.201
1.49
1 59.691
1.98
1
79.201 ( I
I I
1 TOTAL ITER #3 1
IS 1 986.SS
IS 2,125.701
1$
1,549.051 I I
41
1 100 1
1 Safety Vest: Slip Over 1*
3.34
1 334.001
4:20
1 420.001
1
1 ( I
4b
i 200 1
1 Safety vest: Vest Style (
3.37
1 674.001
4.43
1 886.001
1
1 ( I
I 1
1 TOTAL ITEM #4 I
IS 1,008.001
1 1,306.001
15
NO BID I I I
Sa
1 200 1
1 Safety Flats 1
1.89
1 316.001
2.20
1 440.001
(
I I I
Sb
i $00 1
( Safety Cone -w/o iaprinti
3.60
1 1,800.001
3.19
I 1,595.001
I
1 1 I
Sc
1 100 1
1 Safety Cone -w /iaprint 1
330
1 380.001
3.47
1 347.001
I
I 1 1
I I
( TOTAL ITER #S 1
!$ 2,558.001
IS 2,382.001
!$
NO BID 1 1 I
66
11000 1
1 York Cloves I
1.11
1 1,1 0.001
1.37
1 1,370.001
1.25
1
1,250.001 I I
6b
( 100 1
{ Heavy Rubber Clove I
1.14
1 114.001
1.14
1 114.001
1.55
1
155.001 i
6c
1 100 1
1 Light lubber Clove i
1.23
1 (23.001
1.38
1 138.001
1.51
1
151.001 I I
6d
1 50 1
1 Driving Clove 1
2.50
1 125.001
4.28
1 214.001
2.18
1
109.001 I I
6e
( 200 1
1 Eaft fork Clove !
.33
1 bb.001
1.30
( 260.001
.63
1
126.001 I I
6f
1 40 1
1 (elders Clove I
2.67
1 111.201
5.35
1 214.001
4.18
1
167.201 I 1
I I
I TOTAL ITED $6 I
$ 1,652.801
1$ 21310.001
I I
I$
I
11955.101 I I
I I I
I I
I I
I I
( GRAND TOTAL: I
i I
1515,089.051
IS15,FOS.451
I$
3,507.25) I l
I I
I SPECIAL CONDITION: (•Vest is
made of I =Does not
have color I`Did
tot
bid
metal 1 I I
I I
I (
nylon mesh
not 1
fast sipper,the
bondl
frame glasses. I I I
I
I
I_I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I i
I I
I I
I
I 1
I I
I I
I I
I I
I 1
1 I
I I
plastic.
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
1 I
I I
is detachable. I
I I
I I
I I
I 1
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I i I
I 1 I
I I I
I I I
I I 1
CITT OF BLYTOYN
BID TABULATION
ALE: L119AL SAFETT EQUIPBEIT CONTRACT
6 NUBBER: 8507 -103
7 -30 -85 2:00 P.O.
page 3
I
I
I
I TST SUPPLT, INC. {
BOSS US.
CO. (
A6I FASTENED
6 SUPP.1 ABERIGAS IGO I
TEOI
QTT MIT
IDESCRIPTION
I
I
1
I I
'_1
1
(UNIT PRICEIEIT.
PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEIT.
PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEIT. PRICEIUIIT PRICEIEIT. PlICEI
I I i I I
I
I
I
I
I ANNUAL SAFETT EQUIPOENT
I
1
I 1
I I
I
I I
I
I I NO BID 1
i
I
I CONTRACT, per
1
I I
I I
!
I I I
I
I
I specifications.
I
I I
I I
I
I I I
la 1
345 1
I Jacket I Pants
{! 5.32
! 1,B35.401
7.67
I 2,646.151
9.25
1
31191.251 I I
lb 1
345 1
1 Boots
{ 8.90
1 31070.501
8.83
1 3,046.351
11.25
1
31881.251 I I
I
I
I TOTAL ITEM #1
(
IS 41905.901
IS 5,692.501
1$
7,072.501 I I
26 1
100 1
i Hard Bats, include
I
( I
I 1
9.66
1
966.001 1 I
1
I
I ratchet w/o iaprint
I
I I
I I
I
I I I
2b 1
300 1
1 latchets
I
I I
I I
4.62
1
1,386.001 1 i
2c I
50 I
I Bnap Caps
I
I I
I I
3.63
1
168.001 1 I
2d 1
120 1
I linter Liners
1
I I
( 1
3.22
1
386.401 1 I
1
1
1 TOTAL ITEM #2
1
IS 10 BID 1
1$ NO BID 1
I$
2,906.401 1 I
3a 1
SO I
1 ventilation Goggles
1 1.05
1 52.501
1 1
4.55
1
227.501 I I
3b 1
25 1
1 lent. ✓r Anti - Splash Gog.l 1.32
1 33.001
I 1
4.85
1
121.251 1 I
3c 1
300 1
1 Anti - Splash Goggles
1 3.45
1 1,035.001
I 1
4.35
1
1,305.001 I I
3d 1
100 1
1 Eye Glasses
1 10.40
1 1,040.001
1 1
14.65
1
1,465.001 I I
3e 1
100 1
1 Side Prot. Eye Glasses
1 2.80
1 280.001
( 1
3.86
1
386.001 1 I
3f 1
600 1
1 Ear Plugs
i .13
1 78.001
( 1
.34
1
100.601 ( I
3g
1 20 1
1 Head Gear
1 5.10
1 102.001
i 1
3.95
1
79.001 I
3h
i 40 1
1 Face Shellds
1 1.40
1 56.001
( 1
1.86
1
74.401 I I
I I
1 TOTAL ITEO #3
1
1$ 2,676.501
IS NO BID 1
I$
31756.951 ( I
41
1 100 (
1 Safety Test: Slip Over
1 3.32
1 332.001
1 1
3.99
1
399.001 i {
4b
1 200 1
1 Safety Test: vest Style
It' 2.60
1 560.001
1 1
1
10 BID I I I
I I
I TOTAL ITES #4
1
1$ 892.001
1$ NO BID I
IS
399.001 1 I
Sal
200 1
1 Safety Flags
1 1.60
1 360.001
I 1
2.24
1
448.001 1 I
5b
1 500 1
1 Safety Cone -w /o isprintl 3.80
1 1,900.001
I 1
S.78
1
21890.001 1 I
Sc
1 100 1
1 Safety Cone -w /iaprint
1 4.05
1 405.001
I 1
1
10 BID I I I
I I
I TOTAL ITEO #5
I
1$ 2,665.001
I$ NO BID I
IS
31338.001 1 I
6a
11000 1
1 York Gloves
I =" .95
1 950.001
1.24
1 1,240.001
1.70
1
1,695.161 1 I
6b
1 100 1
i Heavy Rubber Glove
( .95
1 95.001
1.09
1 109.001
1.46
1
145.781 1 I
6c
l 100 1
( Light Rubber Glove
1 .63
( 63.001
1.22
1 122.001
1.90
1
190.001 1 I
6d
l 50 1
1 Driving Glove
I 2.30
1 115.001
3.87
1 193.501
4.15
1
207.461 1 I
6e
1 200 1
1 Knit oork Glove
1 1.02
1 204.001
.56
1 112.001
.42
1
84.021 1 I
6f
1 40 1
1 Yelders Glove
1 3.75
1 150.001
3.30
1 132.001
2.39
1
93.721 1
I I
I TOTAL ITEO #6
1
1$ 1,577.001
1$ 11908.501
1$
2,416.141 1 I
I I
I GRAND TOTAL:
1
1$12,716.401
1$ 7,601.001
1$19,890.991
I I
I
I SPECIAL CONDITION:
I'Does not
have color I
I I
I
I I I
I i
I
1 fast :ipper,the hood)
I I
I
( to detachable. I
I 1
I
I I I
I I
I
1 "Test is
lade of I
I I
I
I I I
I I
(
I plastic
aesh not I
I I
I
( I I
I I
I
( nylon.
I I
I I
I
I I 1
I I
I
11 "Bas a
knit wrist
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I band, no
I
I
I
cuff. I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I 1
I
i
I
I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
CITI OF BAITOIN
BID TABULATION
1LE: AMYL SAFETY EQUIPBERT CONTRACT
NOIiBER: 8507 -103
ATE: 7 -30 -85 2:00 P.d.
page 4
I
I
I
IGREAT ANERICAN FIRE
ITEM
QTI (UNIT
IDESCRIPTION
PRIC£IUXIT PRICEIEIT. PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEIT. PR..'I
MIT PRICEIEIT.
PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEIT.
I
I { I I I
1
I
I
(
I
{ ANNUAL SAFETY EQUIPNENT
I
1
I •I
I I (
I I I I I
I
I
I CONTRACT, per
I
I I I
I I I I I
I
I
I specifications.
I
I I I
I I I I I
I
1a (
I
345 1
I
I Jacket 8 Pants
1* 11.05
1 3,812.251 I
I I I I I
lb 1
345 1
I Boots
I 13.13
I 41529.851 I
I I I I I
1
1
I TOTAL IT£e #1
1
IS 6,342.101 I
I I I I I
2a 1
100 1
1 Hard Hats, include
1 4.00
( 400.001 I
I I I I I
I
1
I ratchet w/o iaprint
I
I I
2b 1
300 1
1 Ratchets
I 3.68
1 1,104.001
2c I
SO 1
1 Bnap Caps
i 3.13
I 156.501
2d 1
120 1
1 litter Liners
I 1.56
1 187.201 {
I I I I I
1
1
1 TOTAL ITEN U.
1
IS 1,847.701
3a I
SO I
I Ventilation goggles
I 1.93
1 96.501 I
I I I I I
3b 1
25 1
1 Vent. I Anti — Splash gog.1
2.30
1 57.501
3c 1
300 1
{ Anti - Splash goggles
1 4.32
1 1,296.001
3d 1
100 i
1 Eye classes
{ 11.25
I 1,115.001 I
I 1 I I I
It 1
100 f
1 Side Prot. Eye glasses
I 4.04
1 404.001 I
I ( I I I
3f
1 600 1
1 Ear Plugs
1 32.50
1 97.501 I
I I I I I
3g
1 20 1
1 Head Gear
I 8.06
i 161.201 I
I I I I I
3h
1 40 1
1 Face Sheilds
I 2.51
1 100.801 I
I I I I I
I
I I
I TOTAL ITEM #3 .
I
IS 3,338.501 I
I I I I
4a
1 100 1
1 Safety Vest: Slip Over
{ 1.88
1 188.001 I
I I I
1 4b
1 200 1
1 Safety Vest: Vest Style
1`t 1.86
1 376.001 I
I 1 ( I I
I
1 1
I TOTAL ITER #4
I
IS 564.001
{ 5a
{ 200 1
1 Safety Flags.
{ 2.44
( 488.001 I
( I I I I
{ Sb
1 S00 (
( Safety Cone -wh iaprint) 6.25
1 3,125.001 I
I I ( I I
Sc
1 100 1
{ Safety Cone —w /iaprint
1 9.25
1 925.001 I
I I I ( I
I
I 1
I TOTAL ITEN #5
I
I$ 41538.001
1 61
11000 1
I Vork Gloves
I 1.46
1 1,460.001 I
I ( ( I I
1 6b
1 100 1
1 Heavy Rubber Glove
I 1.79
1 179.001 I
I I I I
1 6c
1 100 1
1 Light Rubber glove
I 1.91
( 191.001 I
I I ( I I
1 6d
1 50 I
1 Driving Glove
I 3.73
I 186.501 I
I I I I I
1 6e
1 200 1
1 Knit lark clove
( 2.25
1 450.001 (
( ( I ( I
16f
1 40 1
1 lelders glove
1 5.08
1 203.201
I
I I
I TOTAL ITEN #6
(
IS 2,669.701 I
I I I I I
I I I I
I
I
I i
I I
I
I GRLXD TOTAL:
I
I
1 1 I
8511,300.001
I
I
( I
I SPECIAL COXDI7I0K:
I *Does tot
have eight I I
I I I I I
I
I i
I
I point suspension.
I
I I
I
I' =Vest is
lade of I I
I I I I I
I
I I
I
I plastic
aesh hot I I
I I I I I
I
I
I I
I I
I
I
I nylon.
I
I I I
I I I
I I I I I
I i I I I
Attachment "D"
CITY OF BAYTOWN
BID TABULATION
ITLI ANNUAL DATA PROCESSING PAPER CONTRACT
NUMBER: 18506 -97
kTE: 7 -30 -85 2:00 P.M.
! ! ! !BOWATER COKPUTER FORK! THE REIN COMPANY ! ORIGANI lMOORE BUSINESS FORKS !
ITEK1 QTY !UNIT !DESCRIPTION ! ! ! ; ;
!UNIT PRIM EXT. PRICE;UNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICE KNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICE!
! ! ! ANNUAL DATA PROCESSING ;
! ! ! PAPER CONTRACT, ;
! ! ! per specifications.
1 ! 300 ! M ! 1 Part, Standard 1 9.58 is 2,874.001 8.98 1$ 2,694.001 8.90 1s 1.670.001 8.80 1$ 2,640.00!
! 1 ! 14- 7/8'x11', 20 lb stock!
2 ! 80 1 M 1 2 Part, Standard 1 22.74 is 1,819.201 19.90 1s 1,592.001 19.50 1s 1,560.001 17.37 1$ 1,389.601
1 1 1 14- 7/8'x11', 15 lb stock! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
3 1 20 1 K ! 4 Part, Standard 1 48.33 1s 966.601 44.42 is 888.401 41.50 is 830.001 39.30 1$ 786.001
1 1 ! 14 -7 /8'X11', 15 lb stock! It
! !
It ; ! ! ! ! ! ! !
4 1 75 1 K 1 1 Part, White 1 6.82 is 511.501 6.57 11 492.751 6.50 1s 487.501 5.92 1$ 444.001
! ! ! 9-1/2'X11', 20 lb stock 1 ; 1 1 ; ; ; ; ;
It 1 11
! ! ! TOTAL BID: ! 1s 6,171.301 1; 5,667.151 !s 5,547.501 is 5,259.601
I I DELIVERY: 1 ! 7 DAYS ! 1 3 DAYS 1 1 2 DAYS 1 1 48 HOURS 1
CITY OF BAYTOWN
PAGE 2
610 TABULATION
'ITLE: ANNUAL DATA PROCESSING PAPER CONTRACT
ID NUMBER: 18506 -97
ATE: 7 -30 -85 2:00 P.K.
a Nil
DATA DOCUMENTS =
MOORE PAPER
COMPANY ;
RALPH SCHUTZMAM { CURTIS
1000
;
ITEM;
QTY
;UNIT
;DESCRIPTION
;UNIT
PRICEIEXT. PRICEIUNIT
PRICE,EXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICE!EXT. PRICE;UHIT PRICEIEXT.
PRICEI
—1--20-11
I
It
;
1
1 1
i
i
i
=
,
1
!
1
ANNUAL DATA PROCESSING
1
; 1
;
I
;
;
1 NO
BID 1
I
1
I
PAPER CONTRACT,
It
1 I
;
I
I
I
per specifications.
'
I ;
I
It
1
11
l
;
300
1 M
I
1 Part, Standard
;
8.12 1i 2,436.401
23.25
1s
2,096.25;
14.17
1s
4,251.00;
1
1
14- 7/8'x11', 20 lb
stock'
;
i
;
'
2
1
80
1 K
1
2 Part, Standard
1
16.08 IS 1,446.401
28.53
is
1,766.861
34.00
1;
2,120.001
1
1
14- 7 /82xll', 15 lb
stock)
1 '
to
;
;
;
It
;
1
I
1
It
1
I It
;
1
1
1
It
1
3
1
20
1 K
1
4 Part, Standard
I
41.69 IS 833.801
31.9S
1$
958.501
69.08
1$
1,727.001
1
1
114-
7/8'x11', 15 lb
stock!
1 4
;
75
1 K
1
l Part, White
1
6.04 1$ 453.001
1531
1i
465.301
10.17
1$
762.751
1
I
9- 1/2'xll', 20 lb stock 1
1 1
1
1
It
1
;
1
1
!
1
TOTAL BID:
1
1; 5,169.201
1$
6,098.911
1$
9,460.751
1
1
!
=
1
1
DELIVERY:
I
12-5 DAYS 1
I
1
1
2 DAYS 1
1
1
Attachment IIE11
CITY OF BAYTOWN
BID TABULATION
TITLE: ANNUAL STORAGE BATTERY CONTRACT
81 BER: 8507 -96
DATE: 7 -31 -85 2:00 P.K.
1
VONCO STARTER SERV. ;
AUTO PARTS CO. ;
TED'S SUPPLY 1
R. P. M.
INC. ;
1ITEM1
QTY
;UNIT !DESCRIPTION.
1
1
1
1
!UNIT
PRICUEXT. PRIMUNIT PRICE!EXT. PRIMUNIT
PRICEMT. PRIMUNIT PRICQEXT.
PRICE;
I
1
1
I
I I
I I
I
1
I
1
I
I
I
1
I
1
1
I
1
=
1
►
1
1
1 !ANNUAL STORAGE BATTERY
!
1
!
!
!
1
1
!
!
; !CONTRACT .
0
1
1
!
!
1
=
1
1
I
1 I
,per specifications.
I
I
I
1
1
1
1
1
I
1 1
1
24
1 eachlType Delco Freedom 8360
1
40.94
1S
982.561
46.95
1i
1,126.801
50.60
1f
1,214.401
34.82
11
835.681
1
1
1
1
1 I
1 I
I
1
I
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 2
!
28
1 eachlType Delco Freedom 8960
1
49.49
1S
1,385.721
55.95
11
1.566.601
69.10
1$
1,934.801
49.04
13
1,373.121
1
I
1 1
1
1
1
1
I
I
1
1
1
1 3
1
10
1 eachlType Kopar
1
41.13
1s
471.301
55.95
1=
559.50!
69.95
1s
699.501
45.45
1$
454.501
1
►
I
1
1 1
, 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1 4
1
10
1 eachlType 40
1
102.96
1f
1,029.601
136.90
3
1,369.001
151.15
:1
1,511.50!
92.48
i1
924.801
1
1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
S
1
10
1 eachlType SD
!
120.46
IS
1,204.601
163.50
1S
1,635.001
182.11
Ii
1,821.701
112.22
11;
1,122.201
I
1
I
1
I I
1 1
I
1
1
1
1
t
1
f
1
1
I
1
I
1
I
1
1
1
1 6
1
20
1 eachlType 77
!
49.49
1S
989.801
55.95
Ii
1,119.001
69.95
1S
1,399.001
1
NO BID 1
I
1
1
1
1 I
! ! TOTAL:
1
1
1
:S
1
6.063.58;
I
:i
1
7.375.901
1
1i
1
81580.90!
1
1
4,710.30
1
1
! 1 DELIVERY:
1
1
15 DAYS 1
!
24 HOURS 1
1
1 DAY 1
1
4 DAI.: 1
1
1
1
1
1 1
► 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
►
1
1
(
1
1
1
I
1
1 1
f
1
I
1
I 1
1
1
I
I
1
t
1 1
t 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
t
I
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1 1
►
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
t
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
r
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
t
1
1
1
1
1 I
I 1
(
►
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
I
1
f
1
t
1 1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
Attachment '�-"
CITY OF BAYTOWN
BID TABULATION
TITLE: ANNUAL CRUSHED CONCRETE FLEXIBLE BASE MATERIAL
810 NUMBER: 18507 -98
DATE: 8 -1 -65 2:00 P.M.
1 1
1
1
1 HOUSTON CRUSHED CONCI CONCRETE
RECYCLING ;
PARKER BROTHERS
1
ANAHUAC TOYING
;
11TEM1 QTY
!UNIT
!DESCRIPTION
It
I
1
1
1
1 ^1
1
1
!UNIT PRICEIEXT.
PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEXT.
PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEXT.
PRICE!
1 1 !6000
!TONS
1 ANNUAL CRUSHED CONCRETE
1 12.00 1 =72,000.001
11.06
1$66,360.001
NO BID 1
1
NO SIDI
1
! !
1
1 FLEXIBLE BASE MATERIAL,
1 1
1
1 !
1
!
1
!
per specifications.
11
,
,
It
, It
,
1 1
I
! DELIVERY:
1 24 HOURS 1
1 24 HOURS
1 1
!
1
1
1
1
I I
I
I I
I
I
I