Loading...
1985 07 25 CC Minutes50725 -1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN July 25, 1985 The City Council of the City of Baytown, Texas, met in regular session on Thursday, July 25, 1985, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the Baytown City Hall with the following attendance: Fred T. Philips *Jimmy Johnson Perry M. Simmons Ron Embry Gerald Dickens Roy L. Fuller Fritz Lanham Larry Patterson Randy Strong Eileen P. Hall Absent: Emmett 0. Hutto Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Mayor Pro Tempore City Manager Assistant City Manager City Attorney City Clerk Mayor The meeting was called to order with a quorum present. The invocation was offered by Reverend Holmes, St. John Baptist Church, afterwhich the following business was conducted: Consider Minutes for the Regular Meeting Held July 11, 1985 Councilman Simmons moved for approval of the minutes for the meeting held on July 11, 1985; Councilman Dickens seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Simmons and Dickens Mayor Pro Tempore Fuller Nays: None %Abstained: Council members Philips and Embry ?Absent: Councilman Johnson Receive Petitions No petitions were presented. Texas 0. Dittman Will Appear *Councilman Johnson present. 50725-2 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 25, 1985 Texas 0. Dittman, 15 S. Ashbel, appeared before council to state that he had been unable to comply with the require- ments of the electrical inspector, and petitioned council to have his electrical service restored. Council informed Mr. Dittman that it will be necessary for him to meet the require- ments of the electrical code in order for electrical service to be provided to the Baltimore Hotel since the health, safety and welfare of the general public is at issue. Mr. Dittman was asked to contact the inspection department for an inspection when the requirements have been met. Consider Adoption of Deed Enforcement Policy Randy Strong, City Attorney, explained that some of the impetus behind this proposed policy statement is some of the local civic associations failing to discover that a structure was being built in violation of the deed restrictions. This policy was drafted with the idea of trying to involve the local civic associations as soon as possible, because there are a number of deed restrictions that the city does not have the power to enforce and others such as building setback lines, while the city may have the power, the city may not be aware of what the various setback lines are for the various subdivisions. Under the proposed policy, when a person comes in to apply for a building permit, they will be required to present a copy of the deed restrictions for the subdivision and sign an affidavit that will attach to that stating that deed restrictions have been reviewed, and the pro- posed plans do not violate the restrictions. If city council required the affidavit by ordinance, the city would fall under a state law which would make a false statement punishable under state law by a fine of $2,000 and one year in jail. Once this affidavit is signed and the building permit application completed, the building department would take the information and send notification to the designated representatives of the local civic associations. The civic association would then be entitled to come down and review the building plans. Hopefully, at that time, these representatives could catch such things as building setback regulations and other type violations. If in checking, the civic association discovers something that would be in violation that the city can enforce, the city could then, in fact, withhold the building permit until that was corrected. If the violation is of a type that the city has no authority to enforce, the city would not be in position to withhold the permit or stop construction of the project, but at that point the civic association would have advance knowledge to prepare their own legal action to stop the violation. In response to an inquiry from council, the city attorney explained that under the proposed policy it would be up to the person requesting the building permit to supply a copy of the deed restrictions. Those are on file with the deed records of Harris County. 50725 -3 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 25, 1985 Councilman Embry stated that his intent in putting together a deed enforcement policy is to provide some degree of communication and possibly in a case of a violation some enforcement to aid in maintaining the residential quality of a neighborhood. At the same time, he did not want the policy to be a hindrance to an applicant; therefore, he wanted to make certain that the applicant is aware what the deed restrictions are and that he is willing to attest that those are being complied with. Personally, he would be willing to place that burden on the applicant, but he felt that that would be a burden. In investigating the possibilities of maintaining a file, the problem of accuracy and in event of error, liability to the city was discussed. Therefore, Councilman Embry stated that he would be willing to place the burden on the applicant to secure a copy of the restric- tions. Councilman Fuller stated that he had spoken with Mayor Hutto who stated that there are complete copies of the deed restrictions that could be available to the city which could be furnished out of the city's file at a reproduction cost. However, it is obvious that this procedure would involve a certain cost administratively, plus the liability to the city. In the case of new subdivisions, the developer is responsible for establishing what the deed restrictions will be and after the subdivision reaches a certain percentage of completion, then the responsibility for enforcement of deed restrictions shifts from the developer to the civic associa- tion. In response to query from council, the city attorney stated that most of the deed restrictions filed since 1950 are automatically renewed, but the very old deed restric- tions from the 30's and 40's are for a set period and have expired unless renewed. The more common problem, however, is not the restrictions expiring due to time, but due to the neighborhood allowing commercial activity without challenge. The policy is designed to help prevent the last problem. Deed restrictions are contract or agreement among the owners and the responsibility for enforcement of deed restrictions rests with the property owners of the subdivisions. It is only through special state statute that the city is involved in a small area of enforcement. Councilman Simmons suggested that the applicants for permits could be referred to the title companies for a copy of their deed restrictions since the title companies have a complete file. Councilman Embry concurred that this would be a very good compromise position based on the costs of the city administering a file and the potential liability. The city could maintain a list of reputable title companies to distribute. The city attorney explained that the legal department would require a certified copy of the deed restriction in a case where suit is filed on behalf of the homeowners, but initially or for the purpose of the building permit, a certified copy would not be necessary. 50725 -4 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 25, 1985 Councilman Embry moved that council adopt the policy as stated and furthermore that council direct the city ad- ministration to prepare an ordinance consistent with the policy for subsequent consideration by council; Councilman Dickens seconded the motion. The city manager pointed out that under the policy it is very possible that the permit could be issued during the review period by the civic association. Councilman Fuller stated that he agreed wholeheartedly that the permit should not be withheld during the review period because the inspection department has been working very hard to improve the processing time for permits. After notification and review by the civic association, if there is a problem, they can work toward its resolve since they will have early notification. Councilman Embry agreed that it is necessary to be fair to the applicant, but also there should be a fair period of time for review by the civic association. The city attorney emphasized that the policy does not contemplate the withholding of the permit while the civic association reviews same. The intent was that if the applicant meets all qualifications for building permit before the civic association completes its review, the permit would be issued. Later, the permit could be withdrawn or suit filed to stop a violation. Also, the city attorney stated that he had understood that this was to be an administrative policy adopted by city council, and it was not his original thought that the policy was to be in ordinance form. The requirement that an affidavit be signed would need to be adopted by ordinance and incorporated into the building code in order for the city to take advantage of the state law concerning false statements on the affidavit. This was the only thing that the city attorney had contemplated including in an ordinance. Mayor Pro Tempore Fuller clarified that what council would be doing at this time is adopting the policy statement as set forth with an ordinance to follow to adopt the procedure for completion of an affidavit with a penalty provision for violation. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Embry, and Dickens Mayor Pro Tempore Fuller Nays: None 50725 -5 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 25, 1985 Consider Proposed Resolution No. 919, Approving Resolution of Baytown Industrial Development Corporation Concerning Issuance of Bonds to Finance a Project for Randall's Center /Baytown CERTIFICATE FOR RESOLUTION APPROVING RESOLUTION OF THE BAYTOWN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CONCERNING ISSUANCE OF BONDS TO FINANCE A PROJECT FOR RANDALL'S CENTER / BAYTOWN I, the undersigned Mayor of the City of Baytown, Harris County, Texas (the "Unit "), hereby certify as follows: 1. The City Council (the "Governing Body ") of the Unit convened in regular session at Baytown, Texas on July 25, 1985, (the "Meeting "), at the designated meeting place, and the roll was called of the duly constituted members of the City Council, to -wit: Emmett Hutto Perry Simmons Roy Fuller Fred Philips Jimmy Johnson Gerald Dickens Ron Embry Mayor Council Member Council Member Council Member Council Member Council Member Council Member All of such persons were present, except the following absentees: Emmett Hutto , thus constituting a quorum. Whereupon a written: RESOLUTION APPROVING RESOLUTION OF BAYTOWN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CONCERNING ISSUANCE OF BONDS TO FINANCE A PROJECT FOR RANDALL'S CENTER / BAYTOWN (the "Resolution ") was duly due discussion, said motion, of the Resolution, prevailed votes: AYES: 5 moved and seconded and, after carrying with it the adoption and carried by the following NOES: 1 2. A true, full and correct copy of the Resolution is attached to and follows this Certificate; the Resolution has been duly recorded in the minutes of the Meeting; the above and foregoing paragraph is a true, full, and correct excerpt from the minutes of the Meeting pertaining to the adoption of the Resolution; the persons named in the above and fore- going paragraph are the duly elected, qualified, and acting members of the Court; each of such members was duly and sufficiently notified officially and personally, in advance, of the time, place, and purpose of the Meeting, and that the Resolution would be introduced and considered for adoption at the Meeting, and each of such members consented, in advance, 50725 -6 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 25, 1985 to the holding of the Meeting for such purpose; and the Meeting was open to the public, and public notice of the time, place, and purpose of the Meeting was given, all as required by Article 6252 -17, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutues, as amended. SIGNED AND SEALED this a?5 day of July, 1985. (see Page No. 9) 50725 -7 RESOLUTION NO. 919 RESOLUTION APPROVING RESOLUTION OF BAYTOWN IAMUSTRIAL DEVELOPMEh7 CORPORATION CONCERNING ISSUANCE OF BONDS TO FINANCE A PROJECT FOR RANDALL'S CENTER /BAYTOWN THE STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF HARRIS § WHEREAS, the board of directors (the "Board ") of the Baytown Industrial Development Corporation has, by a Resolution Concerning Issuance of Bonds to Finance a Project for Randall's Center /Baytown, adopted July 25, 1985 (the "Resolution "), agreed and declared its intent to issue its limited obligation revenue bonds pursuant to the terms of the Development Corporation Act of 1979, Article 5190.6, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes, as amended (the "Act ") and such other statutes as may provide authority therefor, to finance the costs of the project and in the amount set forth in the Resolution for the benefit of Randall's Center /Baytown, a Texas joint venture; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Baytown, Texas, finds and declares that the action of the Board approving the Resolution should be approved and is in the best interests of the inhabitants of the City of = . Baytown, Texas, for the reasons therein set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1: The Resolution, as adopted by the board, agreeing and declaring an intent to issue limited obligation revenue bonds for the purposes and in the amount set forth in the Resolution is hereby approved. Section 2: This Resolution is adopted for the purpose of satisfying the conditions and requirements of the Act and Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, and the regulations promulgated thereunder. 0785032 WP0494 50725 -8 INTRODUCED, READ, and PASSED by the affirmative vote of the City Council of the City of Baytown, this the 25th day of July, 1985. ATTEST: 2 �— r o I EN P. HALL, City Jerk APPROVED: SAN ALL 8. S-TW(YNG ttorney / • 50725 -9 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 25, 1985 Consider Proposed Resolution No. 920, Approving Resolution of Baytown Industrial Development Corporation Concerning Issuance of Bonds to Finance a Project for Independent Plaza III Partnership This item will be discussed at a later meeting. Consider Proposed Ordinance, Amending Chapter 7, "Buildings," to Delete Requirement for Portable Building, 240 Square Feet or Less, to Have Building or Moving Permits Placement Fee, Tie Down Requirements and Definition. Presently, the requirement for persons who build a portable building of 240 square feet is to get a building permit, and the administration feels that for that type structure that should not be necessary. If council elects to adopt the proposed ordinance, the requirement for build- ing permit for portable buildings of 240 square feet or less will be eliminated; however, the individual will be required to tie down the building properly and to place the building properly. The requirement for building permit is in the FHA requirements and when those were adopted by reference, this provision was adopted. The placement fee is $10.00. Councilman Simmons pointed out that this fee is probably not very realistic since the city would be sending inspectors out. The city manager suggested that perhaps all the fees should be reviewed, and council concurred. In response to council query, Mr. Lanham stated that the ordinance would only apply to those buildings constructed after adoption of the ordinance. Councilman Philips moved for adoption of the ordinance; Councilman Johnson seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Embry and Dickens Mayor Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 4201 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS, AMENDING CHAPTER 7, "BUILDINGS," SECTION 7 -4.1, BUILDING CODE -- AMENDMENTS, BY ESTABLISHING AN EXCEPTION FOR CERTAIN PORTABLE BUILDINGS FROM PERMITS; ESTABLSIHING A PLACEMENT FEE AND TIE -DOWN REQUIREMENTS; REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; CONTAINING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. 50725 -10 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 25, 1985 Consent Agenda Council considered the consent agenda as follows: a. Proposed Ordinance No. 50725 -2, will award bids for the construction of the Republic of Texas Plaza. Three bids were received. H. B. Hamilton Construction submitted the low bid of $40,025.60. We recommend the low bidder, H. B. Hamilton Construction, be awarded this contract. b. Proposed Ordinance No. 50725 -31 will award the bid for trash pumps. Bids were mailed to eleven vendors. Four proposals were received. This is a two item bid. The low bidder meeting specifications on both bids was Wacker Corporation. Wacker Corporation submitted a bid of $3,592. We recommend the low bidder, Wacker Corporation, be awarded this contract. c. Proposed Ordinance No. 50725 -4, will award the bid for wall or cabinet mounted chlorinator. Bids were mailed to six vendors and three bids were received. Fischer & Porter submitted the low bid of $3,955. We recommend the low bidder, Fischer & Porter be awarded this contract. d. Proposed Ordinance No. 50725 -5, will award the bid for the annual fill sand contract. Bids were sent to four vendors and two responded. Baytown Sand & Clay submitted the low bid in the amount of $17,250. We recommend the low bidder, Baytown Sand & Clay, be awarded this contract. e. Proposed Ordinance No. 50725 -6, will award the bid for Baker Street Well Pump Repair. Bids were mailed to three vendors and three proposals were received. Alsay Incorporated submitted the low bid of $7,967. We recommend the low bidder, Alsay Incorporated, be awarded this contract. f. Proposed Ordinance No. 50725 -7, will award the bid for electrical service for public works garage. Bids were mailed to 10 vendors and six proposals were received. Bayport Electric, Inc. submitted the low bid of $5,885. We recommend the low bidder, Bayport Electric Inc. be awarded this contract. 50725 -11 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 25, 1985 g. Proposed Ordinance No. 50725 -8, will award the bid for the annual picnic catering service. Bids were mailed to 12 vendors and five proposals were received. The low bidder meeting specifications is Royal Catering. Royal Catering submitted a bid of $3,490. We recommend the low bidder, Royal Catering, be awarded this contract. h. Proposed Ordinance No. 50725 -9, will approve emergency sliplining in the Lakewood area. A sanitary sewer cave -in occured on a major 12" concrete sewer line last Wednesday at the intersection of Lakewood Drive and Mayhaw Drive. Public Works crews re- established flow Thursday evening and are making routine inspections of this line to maintain flows. The line has deteriorated badly since it was repaired during the West District rehabilitation project in 1982 to the extent that the most economical repair procedure now is deemed to be sliplining. Bids to perform the repair work were requested from three contractors. Channel Construction Company, Inc. submitted the low bid of $8,097.60. We recommend the low bidder, Channel Construction Company, Inc. be awarded this contract and that they proceed with this work. Repairs are scheduled to begin on Monday. Councilman Dickens moved to adopt the Consent Agenda Items a through h; Councilman Johnson seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Embry and Dickens Mayor Pro Tempore Fuller For bid tabulations, see Attachments "A" through "G." ORDINANCE NO. 4202 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF H. B. HAMILTON CONSTRUC- TION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF TEXAS PLAZA ON NORTH MAIN STREET AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF FORTY THOUSAND TWENTY -FIVE AND 60/100 ($40,025.60) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 50725 -2) ORDINANCE NO. 4203 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF WACKER CORPORATION FOR THE PURCHASE OF TRASH PUMPS AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF THREE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED NINETY -TWO AND N01100 ($3,592.00) DOLLARS. (Pro- posed Ordinance No. 50725 -3) 50725 -12 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 25, 1985 ORDINANCE NO. 4204 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF FISCHER AND PORTER COMPANY FOR THE PURCHASE OF A WALL OR CABINET MOUNTED CHLORINATOR AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF THREE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED FIFTY -FIVE AND N01100 ($3,955.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 50725 -4) ORDINANCE NO. 4205 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF BAYTOWN SAND AND CLAY COMPANY FOR THE ANNUAL FILL SAND CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY-OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF SEVENTEEN THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED FIFTY AND NO 1100 ($17,250.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 50725 -5) ORDINANCE NO. 4206 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF ALSAY INCORPORATED FOR REPAIRING THE BAKER STREET WELL PUMP AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF SEVEN THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED SIXTY -SEVEN AND N01100 ($7,967.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 50725 -6) ORDINANCE NO. 4207 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF BAYPORT ELECTRIC, INC. FOR THE ELECTRICAL SERVICE FOR PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE AND AUTHOR- IZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF FIVE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED EIGHTY -FIVE AND N01100 ($5,885.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 50725 -7) ORDINANCE NO. 4208 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF ROYAL CATERING FOR THE ANNUAL PICNIC CATERING SERVICE AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF THREE THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED NINETY AND N01100 ($3,490.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 50725 -8) ORDINANCE NO. 4209 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS, DECLARING THAT AN EMERGENCY SITUATION EXISTS; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT FOR THE EMERGENCY SLIPLINING OF 482 FEET OF TWELVE INCH SEWER LINE BETWEEN GREENBRIAR DRIVE AND THE INTERSECTION OF LAKEWOOD DRIVE AND MAYHAW DRIVE; AND APPROVING PAYMENT OF THE SUM OF EIGHT THOUSAND NINETY -SEVEN AND 60/100 ($8,097.60) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 50725 -9) 50725 -13 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 25, 1985 Consider Appointments to Mechanical Board Appointments to this board will be made at a future meeting. Consider Appointments to Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Appointments to this board will be made at a future meeting. Consider Appointments to Baytown Area Water Authority Board Councilman Philips moved to reappoint Robert L. Gillette, Dan Mundinger and A. S. Rome, Jr. to serve two -year terms on the Baytown Area Water Authority Board; Councilman Embry seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Simmons, Embry and Dickens Mayor Pro Tempore Fuller Nays: None City Manager's Report Capital Improvements Program - At the last meeting, the status of the capital improvements program was discussed. In the discussion of the sanitary sewer portion of that, the city manager had indicated that the administration expected to know shortly if the EPA grant would be approved and just a day or two after the meeting, the priority list was received from the Department of Water Resources which categorized the cities according to population. In Baytown's population category, Baytown ranks Number 1. The decision will be made on August 2 as to whether the city will receive funding. The amount of that grant based on the tentative numbers would be $4,400,000. Mr. Lanham had also indicated at that meeting that there was money available for the project in the bond fund along with monies paid in for capital buy -in charges to pay the city's share; however, he was mistaken. If this is the amount that is approved, the city will not have nearly enough. The total amount of the project is approximately $8,000,000. The funding is 55% EPA and 45% City of Baytown, but some of the improvements are not eligible for funding. The project would be divided into four phases with a possibility that two or more of the phases would be out for bids at the same time. Tentatively, the plan is to go out for bids in January for the plant work which is the largest part of the project. The total estimated cost of that is 5.6 million with the local share being about 3.5 million. Therefore, an additional 2 million dollars in bond funds will be needed at that time. 50725 -14 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 25, 1985 Then in June, the engineers suggest that bids be taken on the remaining three projects which would be collection system rehabilitation, lift stations and diversion sewers. The city's share of this project would be just under 1 million dollars with the total amount being 1.5 million dollars. Therefore, the first half of 1986, the city will need about 3 million dollars of additional bond funds over and above what has already been sold and what is on hand. The bonds have been authorized, but have not been sold. Last January when bonds were sold, the administration indicated that it would probably be necessary to have another sale in early 1986. Railroad Crossing Inspection - Periodically, the administration inspects all railroad crossings in the city. The crossings are rated with those in need of immediate repair being ranked No. 1. Both railroad companies have given the administration letters indicating when they expect to start to work on these. Council requested that the administration contact the railroad companies concerning the painting of the old railway station on Texas Avenue. Flood Insurance - The administration was notified back in May that in order for Baytown to remain eligible for flood insurance, it would be necessary to revise the ordin- ance. The legal staff has developed a draft of an ordinance which was provided to council in the packet to alert council that this is something that needs to be acted on at least four weeks prior to November 15 to continue to be eligible for flood insurance. Council was provided with a memorandum from Bill Cornelius, Director of Planning and Traffic, explaining the various changes. This item will be on a future agenda. 1985 Street Improvement Program - The contractor has finished work on North Burnet, Douglas, Homan and Honey- suckle. The base is being installed on East Defee at Seventh. Councilman Fuller mentioned that the cleanup work on North Burnet is not completed. Sidewalk Construction - have been completed, and the the Market Street sidewalk. been completed. Baker Road /Fairway sidewalks contractor is well along on The Lee Drive sidewalk has Drainage Work - City crews are about 45% completed on the Mockingbird /Clayton Street drainage project, and on the Tenth Street Park /Detention area, the contractor is 95% complete. Most of the dirt that was to be hauled has been and now it is a matter of shaping the area. Council inquired if the contractor had placed any top soil back down in the pond, and Mr. Lanham responded that the administration may be coming back to council with a change order in that regard. In a later contract the area will be sodded. 50725 -15 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 25, 1985 Brownwood Cleanup Project - About 25% of the work has been done on this project. Sidewalk along Cedar Bayou Road from McKinney Road to Cedar Bayou Junior School - The administration has developed cost estimates on the possible installation of a sidewalk along Cedar Bayou Road from McKinney Road to Cedar Bayou Junior School. The city engineer suggested that two -24 inch pipes be installed at an estimated cost of $42,000. The major cost involved is not the sidewalk, but the drainage work that would be necessary in order to install the sidewalk. East District Sanitary Sewer - The contractor on the East District Sanitary Sewer work is scheduled to begin work on August 6. Court case - Fair Labor Standards Act - The city attorney explained that in 1976 the U. S. Supreme Court in a case styled the National League of Cities vs Usury upheld the Tenth Amendment grant of powers to the states, and held that states were not subject to the Fair Labor Standards Act. This was considered a major victory for states rights at the time, but recently, the supreme court has reversed itself by a 5 -4 vote, and in Garcia vs the San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority, has taken the opposite opinion. NIMLO has quoted Attorney General, Edwin Meese, who has taken the position that the case is an inaccurate reading of the text of the Constitution, and a disregard of the framers intention that state and local government should be a buffer against the centralizing tendencies of the national government. Five justices denied that the Tenth Amendment protects states from federal laws regulating the wages and hours of state and local employees and went on to say that this overruled their earlier decision. This causes instability in the system, and this instability in decisions concerning the fundamental principle of federalism does the Constitution no service. This was a very troublesome case for cities and other local government in that these entities may no longer be exempt from the Fair Labor Standards Act. Right now, the Secretary of Labor has not made a final decision. He has the authority to decide if municipal employees are exempt; however, the city attorney feels reasonably certain that municipal employees will not be exempt. This is a serious problem from the standpoint of state rights, and it is also a problem from a financial standpoint because the city will be required to pay overtime in all situations. Compensatory time will be eliminated. NIMLO has performed a fact survey and based on information from 281 cities, the costs will be increased by over $400,000,000 per year. Statistically applying that to all municipalities throughout the country, NIMLO estimates that it would cost this country over $5,000,000,000 per year which does not include the cost of changing and keeping city records. This is simply increased payroll costs. There- fore, NIMLO's board has approved the filing of a lawsuit to get a judgement saying due to the costs of the act, it cannot constitutionally be applied to health, police, fire and other essential local government functions. NIMLO has hired Rex Lee to handle the lawsuit and is asking that 50725 -16 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 25, 1985 cities throughout the country participate in the lawsuit. The estimated cost is over $400,000. A trust fund has been established for participation by cities to finance the lawsuit. For a city the size of Baytown, the suggested contribution is $2,000. If the whole amount is not ex- pended, Baytown will be reimbursed for our pro -rata share. Councilman Philips stated that Lieutenant Governor Hobby has gone to Washington to plead for a delay of this and he felt that the whole matter is so huge in scope that it would need to be handled more at a level of legislators. Therefore, he felt that the matter would be resolved in that manner. The city attorney added that if the act remains, the city could be liable for overtime back to April 15, 1985. The labor department will begin enforcement on October 15. Mayor Pro Tempore Fuller asked council to let the administration know if they would like an item in this regard on the next agenda. Councilman Embry stated that he felt that Councilman Philips had made a good point and that everyone should let their representatives know how they feel about this. Failing in that effort, it would be appropriate to consider joining the litigation. Councilman Philips stated that there would be a meeting on August 21 in Dallas that he has considered attending; Council had no objection. Councilman Simmons stated that he would like to see monies included in the budget to cleanup the bridges over Goose Creek Stream at West Main Street and Park Street. He felt that this would be appropriate since this next year is the Sesquicentennial of Texas. Mr. Lanham stated that he would get an estimate of the costs involved to present to Council during the budget work sessions. Recess Into Executive Session to Discuss Pending Litigation and Land Acquisition: Mayor Pro Tempore Fuller recessed the open meeting into executive session to discuss pending litigation and land acquisition. When the open meeting reconvened, the following business was transacted: Consider Proposed Ordinance, Authorizing the Administration to Make Offers for and on Behalf of the City to the Owner or Other Parties in Interest for the Acquisition of Certain Property Councilman Dickens moved to adopt the ordinance author- izing the city manager to make an offer for Eighty Thousand and No /100 ($80,000) Dollars to the U. S. Postal Service for the acquisition of the old post office building on Defee; Councilman Embry seconded the motion. The vote follows: 50725 -17 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 25, 1985 Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Embry and Dickens Mayor Pro Tempore Fuller Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 4210 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO MAKE AN OFFER FOR AND IN BEHALF OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, FOR EIGHTY THOUSAND AND N01100 ($80,000.00) DOLLARS TO THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN INTERESTS IN A TRACT DESCRIBED HEREIN REQUIRED FOR A PUBLIC PURPOSE; PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Consider Proposed Ordinance, Authorizing the City Attorney to Make Offers for and on Behalf of the City of Baytown for Purchase of Property in Brownwood; Requiring That Such Offers be Accepted Within Fifteen (15) Days; Directing the City Attorney to Institute Condemnation Proceedings in the Event Such Offers are Refused Councilman Dickens moved to adopt the proposed ordinance authorizing the city attorney to make offers for Tract Nos. 1, 3 and 4; Councilman Simmons seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Embry and Dickens Mayor Pro Tempore Fuller Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 4211 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO MAKE OFFERS FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN TO THE OWNERS OR OTHER PARTIES IN INTEREST FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN TRACTS DESCRIBED HEREIN REQUIRED FOR PARK PURPOSES; RE- QUIRING THAT SUCH OFFERS BE ACCEPTED WITHIN FIFTEEN (15) DAYS; DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO INSTITUTE CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS IN THE EVENT SUCH OFFERS ARE REFUSED; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Adjourn There being no further business to be transacted, the meeting was adjourned. — , &_, �'.. P g�' � - Eileen P. Hall, City Clerk Attachment "A" CONSULTING ENGINEERS BUSCH, HUTCHISON & ASSOCIATES, INC. AND ARCHITECTS 1 107 FLEETWOOD DRIVE • BAYTOWN. TEXAS 77320 • PHONE (7131422-8213 3333 EASTSIDE. SUITE 268 • HOUSTON. TEXAS 77098 • 17131 323.2367 July 17, 1985 Honorable Mayor & City Council City of Baytown P. 0. Box 424 Baytown, Texas 77522 Gentlemen: On Tuesday, July 16, 1985, bids were opened at City Hall for construction of the Republic of Texas Plaza on North Main Street. The following bids were received and opened: H. B. Hamilton Construction - $40,025.60 Angel Brothers Ent., Inc. - $43,200.00 Beyer- Schindewolf Construction - $72,668.50 It is our recommendation after reviewing all bids that the contract be awarded to the low bidder, H. B. Hamilton Construction. Sincerely, David L. Black, P. E. DLB /aa CITY OF BAYTOWN BID TABULATION TITLE: TRASH PUMPS BID NUMBER: #18505 -85 DATE: 7 -9 -85 2:00 P.M. Attachment "B" 9 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 WACKER CORPORATION ; F. W. GARTNER CO._1 ITEM 1 QTY 1 UNIT 1 DESCRIPTION ; I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 !UNIT PRICE;EXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICE;EXT. PRICE' 1 1 1 2 1 EACH ! 3" TRASH PUMP, 1 914.55 1$ 1,829.101 1,024.001; 2,048.00' 1 1 ! 1 per specifications. 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 2 1 1 ! 1 1 1 EACH 1 411 TRASH PUMP, = 1 1 1$ 1 1,763.441 1 1$ 1 2,969.001 per specifications. MAKE: ! WACKER ! 1 CARTER 1 -. 1 TOTAL: 1 1$ 3,592.541 !$ 5,017.001 ' 1 ! 1 DELIVERY: 1 3 DAYS 1 1 30 DAYS 1 1 SPECIAL CONDITION: 1 1 1 1 1 9 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 I ,1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I ,1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 :T- TRASH PUMPS IO NUMBER: #8505 -85 4TE: 7 -9 -85 2:00 P.M. CITY OF BAYTOWN BID TABULATION PAGE 2 DELIVERY: SPECIAL CONDITION: 1 1 i 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 30 DAYS ; ; 30 DAYS 'DOES NOT MEET SPECS; ON OIL ALERT SHUT- ; OFF d DISCHARGE CAPACITY. i 1 1 I ACNE PUMV & WMLrl� i runr & rUWMK QWuir i ITEM 1 QTY 1 UNIT 1 DESCRIPTION 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 ;UNIT PRICE;EXT. PRICE;UNIT PRICE;EXT. PRICE; 1 ; 2 ; EACH ; 3" TRASH PUMP, ; 884.00 ;$ 1,768.00; 1,024.001$ 2,048.00; per specifications. 2 ; 1 EACH 11 4" TRASH PUMP, ; ;$ 2,262.00; ;$ 2,969.00; it per specifications. i i i 1 1 - IGar••an- 1- MAKE: i i i �yBP TOTAL: ; ;$ 4,030.00; ;$ 5,796:00; DELIVERY: SPECIAL CONDITION: 1 1 i 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 30 DAYS ; ; 30 DAYS 'DOES NOT MEET SPECS; ON OIL ALERT SHUT- ; OFF d DISCHARGE CAPACITY. i 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 Attachment "C" CITY OF BAYTOWN BID TABULATION TLE: NAIL OR CABINET MOUNTED CHLORINATOR 0 NUMBER: f6506 -86 TE: 1 -10 -85 1:00 P.M. INCHLOR SERVICES INC; FISCHER t PORTER ; MACAULAY CONTROLS TEM; QTY ;UNIT ;DESCRIPTION 1 I NUTT PQICF!FYT_ PRICF!ONIT PRICF!EXT. PRICE!UNIT PRICE!EXT. PRICElUNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICE; NAIL OR CABINET ; ;f 81875.00; ;f 3.955.00; ;f 9,000.00; MOUNTED CHLORIHATORt per specifications. , MODEL: ; FISCHER t PORTER ; FISCHER t PORTER ; WALLACE t TIERNAN ; WARRANTY: ; 11 MONTHS; ; 12 MONTHS; ; 12 MONTHS; DELIVERY: ; 60 DAYS ARO ; 6 -8 WEEKS ARO ; 90 DAYS ARO s ; ; CITY OF BAYTOWN BID TABULATION LE:` ANNUAL FILL SAND CONTRACT I NUMBER: 18506 -91 7 -10 -85 1:00 P.K. Attachment "D" BAYTOWN SAND A CLAY ; RIGHT WAY SAND COMP ; 0 i €MI QTY lUNIT ',DESCRIPTION i ;UNIT PRICEIEXT PRICE' UNIT PRICE;EXT. PRICE;UNIT PRICElEXT. PRICEiUNIT PRICE;EXT. PRICE; 1 ;5000 ; YDS ; ANNUAL FILL SAND CONT. ; 3.15 /YD ; ;55.20/ ; 3.15 /YD per specifications. LOAD 0 DELIVERY: 1/2 DAY ARO ANY DAY ARO TOTAL: 1117,250.00 ��18,750.00� i i i i CITY OF BAYTOWN BID TABULATION ;TLE: BAKER STREET WELL PUMP REPAIRS 1 NUMBER: 18506 -92 iTE: 7 -11 -85 2:00 P.K. Attachment "E" 1 ; ; ; 0 0 ; ; , , , , ; , , , LAYNE TEXAS CO. ; LAYNE WESTERN ; ALSAY INCORPORATED ; ITEM; QTT ;UNIT ;DESCRIPTION ;UNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICE,UNIT PRICU EXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICEIUNIt PRICE;EXT. PRICEI 1 1 1 1 LOT 1 BAKER STREET WELL PUMP 1 IS 8,270.00; IS 8,532.003 7,967.00; 1 1 1 REPAIRS, ; ; ; 1 ; 1 per specifications. , , , , , i , , , , 1 1 DELIVERY: 1 15 CALENDAR DAYS 1 15 CALENDAR DAYS 1 15 CALENDAR DAYS 1 1 1 1 ; ; ; 0 0 ; ; , , , , ; , , , Attachment "F" CITY OF BAYTOWN 810 TABULATION 'LE: ELECTRIC SERVICE FOR PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE I NUMBER: 18506 -93 7 -12 -85 2:00 P.N. PFEIFFER ELECTRIC CO! GULF COAST ELECTRIC ; WHITLEY ELECTRIC ; RAPES ELECTRIC ; BEM; QTY ;UNIT ;DESCRIPTION ;UNIT PRICE!EXT PRICE;UHIT PRICE!EXT. PRICE,UHIt PRICE;EXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICE;EXT. PRICE; t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ; I ; LOT 1 ; ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO ; ;=10,585.00; is 81215.00; ;= 6,762.00; is 6,250.43; PUBLIC FORKS GARAGE, ; ; 11 ; 11 1 per speciflcatlons. ; ; ; i ; DELIVERY: ; ; 10 DAYS ; ; 10 DAYS ; i.10 DAYS ; ; 10 DAYS ; 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 t I 1 1 Y 1 1 I t 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I t 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 t 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t I 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 CITY OF BAYTOWN PAGE 2 810 TABULATION TITLE: ELECTRIC SERVICE FOR PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE ILO NUMBER: 18506 -93 IATE: I -12 -85 2:00 P.M. H Ii H ELECTRIC CO. 1 BAYPORT ELECTRIC INC1 ; ;ITEM; QTY ;UNIT ;DESCRIPTION ; ;UNIT PRICE;EXT. PRICE, PRICE;EXT. PRICE;UNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICE, I�1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ( 1 1- 1 ; ; LOT 1 ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO ; ;= 6, 49.851 1$ 5,885.001 1 1 1 1 PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE, 1 1 1 1 per specifications. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 DELIVERY: 1 1 5 DAYS 1 i 10 DAYS 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1• 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I S 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CITY Of BAYTOWN 810 TABULATION TLE: ANNUAL PICNIC CATERING SERVICE 0 NUMBER: 18506 -87 TTE: 7 -11 -85 2:00 P.M. Attachment "G" CATERING BY LYNETTE 1 LENOX BBQ i CATERING; ROYAL CATERING ; DEMERIS BARBQUE ; TEN! QTY !UNIT !DESCRIPTION !UNIT PRICE:EXT. PRICE:UNIT PRICE!EXT. PRICE :UNIT PRICE:EXT. PRICE :UNIT PRICE :EXT. PRICE! l 11000 1 EA ! ANNUAL PICNIC CATERING 1 3.50 Is 3,500.001 3.65 1= 3,650.001 3.49 Ii 3,490.001 3.50 is 3,500.001 ' ' ' SERVICE It ' ' ' ' ' ' ' Is per specifications. 2 ! 1 1 ALTERNATE: per specs. 1 IS 31001.00! 1 =2,117.00 1 3 21640.001 1; 4,475.501 1 ! ! DELIVERY: 1 9-13 -BS 1 1 9 -13 -85 1 1 1 1 ! ! ! 1 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! CITY OF BAYTOWN 810 TABULATION ITLE: ANNUAL PICNIC CATERING SERVICE NUMBER: 18506 -87 ATE: 7 -II -85 2:00 P.M. PAGE 2 t , , i i , , , , , t t , , i i i i , i TON PIERCE BBQ I*CATI ITEM: QTY !UNIT jOESCRIPTION ; ; ;UNIT PRICE! XT. PRICE;UNIT PRICE;EXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICE,'EXT. PRICE;UNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICE; _; 1 11000 ; EA ; ANNUAL PICNIC CATERING 14.20JCAKE ;s 4,200.00; 1 1 1 SERVICE, 14.451 is 4,450.001 per specifications. ; COBBLER ; 11 i 0 1 ; ; ; ALTERNATE: per specs. ; ;s 7,447.50; t , , i i , , , , , t t , , i i i i , i Attachment "A" CITY OF BAYTOWN 610 TABULATION ITLE: ANNUAL CAST IRON CASTINGS CONTRACT NUMBER: 18506 -95 ATE: 7 -17 -85 2:00 P.M. 0 I 1 ; UTILITY SUPPLY COMP ' GOLDEN TRIANGLE PIPE; TECH SALES ; WHITE SUPPLY = ITEM; QTY ;UNIT ;DESCRIPTION ;UNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICEIUNIT PRiCEIIEXT. PRICE;UKIT PRICE;EXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICE;EX7. PRICES ANNUAL CAST IRON CASTING; ; ; ; ; ; _ ; NO BID ; CONTRACT, per specifications. ; s , Adjustable Valve Box ; 1$ 1,792.001 1$ 2,255.201 1$ 2,040.001 2a 1 1 1 Manhole Covers ; 1 2,760.001 1 1,714.401 1 NO BID I = 1 b 1 1 ' Manhole Casting i Cover 1 1 81800.00; 1 7,441.501 1 1 1 ; C 1 1 1 Rectangular Grate Casting 1 1,350.001 1 19230.801 1 1 1 1 >< Open Cover , I 11 , , � , � 1 I 1 Total Item J2: 1 1$12,910.001 1310,386.701 1 1 1 1 ; It ; ; ; •3 1 1 ; Sever Cleanouts — 1 ;3 900.001 ;3 990.001 ;3 1,185.001 1 1 , , , , , , Exxon Type Inlet Casting' ;3 6,120.001 1$ 5,536.801 1 NO BID I 1 1 1 1 1 6 Inlet Grate Covers 1 1 1 1 , , , , 1 I 1 TOTAL BID: 1 1$21,722.001 1319,168.701 1$ 3,225.001 1 1 WARRANTY: 1 BY MANUFACTURER 1 1 YEAR 1 DELIVERY: 1 10 DAYS ARO 1 10 DAY 1 110 -1S DAYS! SUPPLY POINT: 1 HOUSTON, TEXAS 1 BEAUMONT, TEXAS !WACO, TEXAS 1 1 1 , CITY OF BAYTOWN PAGE 2 BID TABULATION 'ITLE: ANNUAL CAST IRON CASTINGS CONTRACT IIO NUMBER: JOS06 -95 ►ATE: 7 -17 -85 2:00 P.M. i 1 I 1 MUNICIPAL PIPE 1 AQUA UTILITY SUPPLY 1 i ;ITEM', QTY ',UNIT ;DESCRIPTION ',UNIT PRICE;EXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICE;EXT. PRICEIUHIT PRICEIEXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICE', I I i I 1 1 1 1 11 I I I i i i 1 ANNUAL CAST IRON CASTING', CONTRACT, i I I I per specifications. 1 I I I I I I I i 1 1 i 1 i 1 i 1 i Adjustable Valve Box 1 i I 1; 1,913.601 i i is 1,920.001 1 1 1 1 i 2a I i I Manhole Covers 1 1 1,794.001 1 2,560.001 1 b 1 1 1 Manhole Casting 3 Cover 1 1 7,791.251 1 6,900.001 1 1 1 I 1 c 1 1 ', Rectangular Grate Casting 1 1,209.601 ', NO BID 1 I Open Cover I 1 1 1 Total Item #2: 1 1 ;10,794.851 1; 9,460.001 1 1 I I 1 3 1 1 1 Sever Cleanouts 1 1; 810.00', IS 870.001 1 4 I 1 1 Exxon Type Inlet Casting) " 11,448.001 is 4,248.001 I I Inlet Grate Covers 1 1 I I I I I I I s I i 1 I 1 i 1 I TOTAL BID: 1 I I 1 ;24,966.451 It 1 =16,498.001 I I I i f I i I i i I I I 1 1 1 WARRANTY: 1 BY MANUFACTURER ', BY MANUFACTURER I 1 1 1 DELIVERY: 1 STOCK TO 10 DAYS 1 STOCK - 30 DAYS 1 s 1 I I I = I 1 i 1 I 1 I SUPPLY POINT: ', I 1 HOUSTON, TEXAS 1 1 1 HOUSTON, TEXAS I 1 I 1 I s I I I I s I I 1 I I I ' s s s i i i s i i i i s i i CITY OF BAYTOWN 810 TABULATION ITLE: ANNUAL TIRE AND TUBE CONTRACT ID NUMBER: 18506 -94 IATE: 7-17 -85 2:00 P.K. W Attachment "B" ! 1 1 1 GOODYEAR CENTER = A-Z TIRE i BATTERY 1 GENERAL TIRE 1 B.F. GOODRICH ; ITEM! QTY !UNIT !DESCRIPTION 1 1 1 1 1 !UNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICE :EXT. PRICE: ! 1 ! ANNUAL TIRE AND TUBE 1 1 1 ! ! ! 1 1 ! 1 1 ! CONTRACT, per ! 1 ! ! 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 specifications. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 It 1 1 1 ! ! ! ! 1 ! ! 1 It ! 1 : SECTION l: POLICE TIRES 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1! l0 1 ! 195- 75RI4WSW 1 37.76 it 377.60! ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 75 1 1 225/70 R15 1 39.99 1 2,999.251 1 1 1 1 1 It 3 1 50 1 1 135/70 R15 1 41.01 1 2,050.501 ! ! 1 ! 1 1 1 1 ! TOTAL SECTION 1: 1 1'$ 5.427.351 1 NO 810 ! 1 NO BID 1 1 NO BID 1 1 1 : SECTION II: TRUCK TIRES 1 1 ! 1 ! ! ! ! ! 1 1 1 AND TUBES 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 ! ! 4 : 8 1 ! LT215/85 R16D 1 65.94 1 527.521 77.72 1 621.761 65.94 1 527321 62.31 1 498.48! 5 : l0 1 ! 7.0014 1 28.53 1 285.301 42.61 1 426.101 2833 ' 285.30 33.89 1 338.901 6 : 30 1 1 225170 RIS 1 34.85 1 1.045.50: 42.45 1 11273.501 38.30 1 1,149.001 45.33 1 1,359.901 7 ! 54 1 1 670 X 15 1 31.17 1 1,683.18! 37.33 1 2,015.821 31.17 1 1,683.18 1 NO BID 1 1 8 1 4 1 1 700 X 14 1 30.14 1 120.561 41.61 1 170.441 28.53 1 114.12! 33.89 1 135.561 9 1 15 1 1 700 X 15 1 38.82 1 582.301 38.95 1 584.251 34.58 ! 518.701 41.44 it 621.6011 110 1 50 11 1 750 X 16 6 PLY 1 38.35 1 1,917.501 49.06 1 2,453.001 38.35 1 1,917.50 48.32 1 2,416.001 111 1 32 1 1 750 X 16 8 PLY 1 43.74 1 1,399.661 49.06 1 1,569.921 43.74 1 1,399.68' 49.14 1 1,512.461 111 1 10 1 1 800 X 16.5 1 35.94 1 359.401 55.07 1 550.701 35.94 1 359.401 42.85 1 428.501 113 1-20 1 1 Ill -16SL 1 73.67 1 1,473.401 53.63 1 1.072.60! 130.84: 2,616.8011 '75.56 1 1,511.20: 114 : 20 1 1 900 X 20 1 94.30 1 1,886.001 103.75 1 2,075.001 93.39 1 1,867.80: 112.46 1 1,249.60! 115 1 60 It 1 1000 X 20 1 125.27 1 7,516.201 122.14 1 7.328.401 134.06 1 7,443.601 135.42 1 8,125.201 116 1 60 1 1 1100 X 20 1 136.86 1 8,211.601 128.87 1 7,732.20 135.53 1 8,131.801 143.78 1 8,616.801 117 1 10 1 1 1300 X 14 1 199.31 1 1,993.101 201.96 1 2,019.60: 199.31 it 1,993.10; 236.96 1 2,369.60! 116 ! 12 1 1 13.6 -28R4 : 132.04 1 1,584.48; 1 NO BID 1 188.32 It 2,259.841 192.57 1 1,310.841 119 1 12 It 1 14.9 -2484 1 140.13 : 1,681.561 195.61 it 2,347.3211 210.71 1 2,528.521 161.99 1 1,943.88: 120 ! 11 1 it 17.51 -24R4 1 203.04 1, 2,436.48: 219.73 1 2,636.761 304.09 1 31649.081 232.58 1 2,790.961 121 1 12 1 1 16.9 -24R4 it 189.11 21 ,270.52: 216.75 of 2,601.00: 262.44 1 3,149.28! 205.57 of 2,466.841 122 ! 12 1 It 16.9 -30R1 1 205.51 1 2,466.121 208.45 1 1,501.401 165.00 1 3,180.001 199.22 1 2_ 390.641 123 ! 4 1 1 P155 X BOR13 1 22.88 1 91.521 28.01 1 112.041 25.64 1 102.561 30.77 1 123.081 124 1 4 1 1 8- 14.5LT 1 46.36 1 185.521 57.55 1 230.101 39.14 1 156.56! 65.19 1 260.761 125 1 6 1 1 LT235 -85R16 1 76.21 1 457.261 81.79 1 490.741 76.21 1 457.261 71.85 1 431.10; 126 1 6 1 1 950- 16.51.1 1 45.66 1 365.441 62.26 1 498.081 45.68 1 365.441 53.43 1 427:441 121 1 8 1 1 6.75- 16.5LT 1 42.27 1 338.1611 53.80 11 454.401 42.27 1 338.161 46.84 1 390.721 128 ' 4 1 1 16.9 -28RI 1 185.75 1 743.00: 188.01 1 752.081 246.86 1 987.441 215.26 1 861.121 129 4 1 1 18.4 -30R1 1 216.82 1 867.28; 224.57 1 898.281 306.25 1 1,225.001 278.06 1 1,112.241 130 1 8 1 1 6.50 -6LT 1 29.44 1 235.521 37.07 1 296.561 29.17 1 233.361 38.70 1 309.601 :31 ! 1 1 1 6.12R4TR 1 15.09 18 15.091 24.66 1 24.661 31.27 1 31.271 40.00 1 40.00! TOTAL SECTION 11 1 1$42,739.191 :143,736.811 1:48,671.271 1146,113.041 1 , GRAND TOTAL: : 348,166.5411 1$43,736.811 1$48,671.27: 1146,113.04: : : : : SPECIAL CONDITION: 1 Prices are tire prices only. We have solicited tube prices too. The tire prices :sere! determined by delivery. , , , , It , , , BRAND: I GOODYEAR 1 :SUKKIT, UNITED, HAT'L: GEN. ARKSTRONG, KELLY 1 I 1 1 DELIVERY: 1 20 DAYS ARO :3 DAYS ARO: 1 5 DAYS ARO : ! ! CITY OF BAYTOWN BID TABULATION ITLE: ANNUAL TIRE AND TUBE CONTRACT 10 NUMBER: 18506 -94 ATE: 7 -17 -85 2:00 P.M. page 2 I ! 1 1 FULLER TIRE I 1 I 1 ITEM! QTY !UNIT !DESCRIPTION I i ! i I !UNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICElUNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICEI 1 1 I ANNUAL TIRE AND TUBE 1 ! 1 1 1 1 I 1 ! 1 ! ! CONTRACT, per 1 1 NO BID 1 1 ! specifications. ! I ! SECTION 1: POLICE TIRES l 1 10 ! ! 195- 75RI4WSV 2 1 75 1 ! 225/70 R15 3 ! 50 I ! 235/70 RI5 1 1 ! TOTAL SECTION 1: 1 ! ! SECTION II: TRUCK TIRES ! 1 ! AND TUBES 4 ! 8 ! ! LT215/85 R16D 5 ! 10 ! 1 7.0014 6 ! 30 ! 1 225/70 RI5 ;7 154 ! ! 670X15 ! ! ! ! I ! ! ! ! 1 8 1 4 1 ! 700 X 14 9! 15 I ! 700 X 15 l0 150 I ! 750 X 16 6 PLY ll r 32 I 1 750 X 16 6 PLY 112 110 1 1800X16.5 113 1 10 1 ! ill -16SL ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 114 1 20 1 1 900 X 20 115 1 60 I 1 1000 X 20 I i 1 ! I ! I ! ! 116 1 60 1 1 1100 X 20 ! i i ! I I ! ! ! ill 1 10 Is 1300 X 24 118 ! 12 I ! 13.6 -28R4 119 1 12 I 1 14.9 -24R4 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 120 112 I 1 I7.5L -24R4 ! ! I i I ! ! ! ! 121 1 12 1 1 16.9 -14R4 ! ! ! ! I ! ! ! ! 122 111 1 1 16.9 -30R1 I ! I ! ! ! I ! I 123 1 4 1 1 P155 X BOR13 ! I ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 124 1 4 ! 1 8- 14.5LT ! 125 1 6 1 1 LT235-85RI6 ! !26 1 8 1 1 950- 16.5LT ! ! It 127 1 8 1 1 8.7S- 16.5LT I i It 128 ! 4 ! 1 16.9 -18R1 ! i i i ! ! ! i ! !29 i 4 1 1 18.4 -30R1 i It 1 ! ! i i ! ! 130 1 8! ! 6.50 -61.1 ! 1 I ! I i I ! 1 !3l ! 1 ! 1 6.12R47R CITY OF BASTOVN BID TABULATI01 ILE: ANNUAL SAFETY EQUIPBENT CONTRACT D NOSIER: 8507 -103 TEt 7 -30 -85 2:00 P.B. Attachment "C" I I BISSISSIPPI TOOL 1 SEA LEVEL SUPPLI I SOUTHVEST GLOVE 1 BOBILE IND. SAFETI TEII qTT (UNIT IDESCQIPTIO1 I 1 ( I I I 1UNIT PRICEIEIT. I I PRICEIUNIT PYICEIEIT. I i PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEIT. I I PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEIT. I I PRICEY I 1 I I i I ANNUAL SAFETY EQUIPIENT I I ( I I I I 1 I I I I CONTRACT, per I I I I I I I I I I I I specifications. I I I I I I i i I I I I I I I I la 1 I 1 345 1 I I 1 Jacket Ii Pants 1 7.95 I 1 2,742.751 : 4.72 1 1,628.401 8.40 1 2,898.001 7.99 1 2,756.551 lb 1 345 1 1 Boots 1 10.20 1 3,519.001 8.83 1 3,046.351 9.53 1 3,287.851 9.49 1 3,274.051 1 1 TOTAL ITEB #1 1 1$ 6,261.751 1$ 4,674.151 1$ 6,185.851 1$ 6,030.601 2a 1 100 1 1 Bard Bats, include 1 5.98 1 598.001 5.66 1 $66.001 1 1 5.99 1 599.001 I 1 1 ratchet w/o Isprint I 1 I I I 1 I I I 2b 1 300 1 1 Ratchets 1 4.95 1 11485.001 1 90 BID 1 1 1 3.29 1 987.001 2c 1 50 1 I BURP Caps 1 3.51 1 175.501 3.00 1 150.001 ( 1 1.69 1 134.501 2d 1 110 1 1 Vinter Liners 1 2.95 1 354.001 1.21 1 145.201 I 1 2.49 1 298.801 1 I I TOTAL ITEN #2 1 1$ :,611.501 1$ 861.201 1$ NO BID 1 1$ 2,019.301 31 1 SO ( 1 Ventilation Goggles 1 1.55 1 17.501 1.85 1 91.501 1 1 1.39 1 119.501 3b 1 15 1 1 Vent. i Anti- Splash Gog.1 2.10 1 67.501 1.16 1 54.001 I I 2.79 1 69.751 3c 1 300 1 1 Anti- Splasb Goggles 1 2.60 1 760.001 2.25 1 675.001 I 1 1 NO BID I 3d 1 100 I I Eye Glasses 1 3.98 1 398.001 8.85 1 865.001 1 1 6.99 1 699.001 3e 1 100 1 1 Side Prot. Eye Glasses 1 3.92 1 392.001 3.38 1 338.001 1 1 2.39 1 239.001 if 1 600 1 1 Ear Plugs 1 .17 1 102.001 .16 1 96.001 1 1 .13 1 76.001 It 1 20 1 1 Head gear 1 5.76 1 115.101 1 NO BID I I I I NO BID I 3h 1 40 1 1 Face Sbeilds 1 1.90 1 76.001 3.46 1 138.401 I 1 1.39 1 95.601 1 1 1 TOTAL ITEI #3 1 1$ 2,008.201 1$ 2,178.901 IS NO BID 1 1$ 11300.851 41 ( 100 1 1 Safety Vest: Slip Over 1 4.36 1 436.001 3.25 1 325.001 1 1 1 NO BID I 4b ( 200 1 1 Safety Vest: Vest Style 1 4.46 1 892.001=2 3.40 1 680.001 1 1 3.79 1 756.001 I 1 1 TOTAL ME #4 1 1$ 1,328.001 1$ 1,005.001 is NO BID 1 1$ 758.001 Sa 1 200 1 1 Safety Flags - 1 1.35 1 210.001 1.27 1 254.001 1 1 1.39 1 178.001 Sb 1 S00 1 I Safety Cone -w /o iaprintl 3.95 1 1,915.001 3.23 1 1,615.001 1 1 4.29 1 2,145.001 Sc 1 100 1 1 Safety Cone - x/laprint 1 4.20 1 420.001 3.50 1 350.001 1 1 1 NO BID I I I I TOTAL ITEI #5 1 1$ 2,665.001 1$ 2,219.001 1$ NO BID 1 1$ 2,423.001 6a 11000 1 1 lark cloves 1 1.10 1 1,100.001 1.34 1 1,340.001 1.10 1 1,200.001 1.39 1 1,390.001 6b 1 100 1 1 Heavy Rubber Clove 1 1.50 1 1SO.001 I NO BID 1 1.10 1 120.001 1.59 1 159.001 6c 1 100 1 1 Light Rubber Glove 1 2.25 1 215.001 1 NO BID 1 1.43 1 143.001 1 NO BID I 6d I SO I I Driving clove I 3.25 1 162.501 1 NO BID 1 2.35 1 117.501 1 174.501 6e 1 200 1 1 Knit lark Glove 1 1.25 1 250.001 1 NO BID 1 .31 1 62.001 1 158.001 6f 1 40 1 1 Velders Clove 1 4.00 1 160.001 1 NO BID 1 3.82 1 152.801 1 179.601 1 TOTAL ITEI 16 1 I$ 2,047.501 1$ 1,340.001 1$ 1,795.301 1$ 2,061.101 I I I I I I GRAND IOTAL: I I 1$16j912.951 I l I 1$12,378.851 I I is 11981.151 I I 1$14,592.851 I I SPECIAL CONDITION: I I I'Does not have color I I I I I I I I ( I I fast zipper, the hood i I I I I I I I I I is detachable. I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 "Vest is lade of I I 1 I I I I I I I I plastic sesh not I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I nylon. I I I I I I I ( I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ( I I I I CITI OF BAYTOWN BID TABULATION TLE: ANNUAL SAFETI EQUIPSENT CONTRACT D Nunn: 8507 -103 U: 7 -30 -65 2:00 P.H. page 2 I I I I THE GLOVE COSPANI I EINCO INC. ! GROVES IND. SUPPLI ! TACEBERRI COSPANI I 7ES1 QTI (UNIT IDESCRIPTION I I I I I I I I 1 I I ANNUAL SAFETI EQUIPAENT ! I I I I I I I I i I i I I I I NO BID { i I I CONTRACT, per I I I I I I I I I I I I specifications. 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I i la I I 1 345 1 I I 1 Jacket R Pants { 7.12 1 11456.401 * 6.41 I 2,211.451 { I I I lb { 345 1 ( Boots ( 10.12 1 30491.401 9.40 1 3,242.001 1 ( ( I I I I TOTAL ITEN 11 ( IS 5,941.801 1$ 5.953.9S1 IS NO BID 2a ( 100 1 1 Hard Hats, include 1 5.OS 1 505.001 S.13 I 573.001 I I I I I I I ratchet w/o iaprint I I I I I I I I I 2b 1 300 1 1 Ratchets I 3.60 1 1,080.001 4.29 1 1,287.001 I I ( I 2c 1 50 1 1 Bnmp Caps i 2.49 1 114.501 2.35 1 117.501 I I 1 I 2d 1 120 I ( linter Liners 1 1.87 1 224.401 2.09 I 250.801 I I I TOTAL ITEN #2 I 1�$ ,933.901 1$ 11228.301 1$ 10 BID 3a ( SO I I Ventilation 6oaales. 1 1.72 i B6.001 2.21 1 110.501 1.63 1 81.501 I 1 3b 1 2S I I Vent. I Anti - Splash 601.1 1.99 ( 49.75! 2.56 1 64.001 1.95 1 48.751 I I 3c 1 300 1 1 Anti - Splash Goggles 1 2.77 1 831.001 2.96 1 868.001 1.9S 1 585.001 I 3d 1 100 1 1 Eye Classes I 6.08 1 608.001 5.19 1 519.001* 2.83 1 283.001 I I 3e 1 100 1 1. Side Prot. Eye Classes { 1.88 { 188.001 3.OS I 305.001 3.04 1 304.001 I I 3f 1 600 1 ) Ear Plugs I .12 I 72.001 .14 1 84.001 .15 1 90.001 I 31 1 20 1 ( Head fear ( 4.43 I 98.601 4.78 1 95.601 3.88 1 17.601 I 1 3h 1 40 1 1 Face Sheilds ( 1.38 ( S5.201 1.49 1 59.691 1.98 1 79.201 ( I I I 1 TOTAL ITER #3 1 IS 1 986.SS IS 2,125.701 1$ 1,549.051 I I 41 1 100 1 1 Safety Vest: Slip Over 1* 3.34 1 334.001 4:20 1 420.001 1 1 ( I 4b i 200 1 1 Safety vest: Vest Style ( 3.37 1 674.001 4.43 1 886.001 1 1 ( I I 1 1 TOTAL ITEM #4 I IS 1,008.001 1 1,306.001 15 NO BID I I I Sa 1 200 1 1 Safety Flats 1 1.89 1 316.001 2.20 1 440.001 ( I I I Sb i $00 1 ( Safety Cone -w/o iaprinti 3.60 1 1,800.001 3.19 I 1,595.001 I 1 1 I Sc 1 100 1 1 Safety Cone -w /iaprint 1 330 1 380.001 3.47 1 347.001 I I 1 1 I I ( TOTAL ITER #S 1 !$ 2,558.001 IS 2,382.001 !$ NO BID 1 1 I 66 11000 1 1 York Cloves I 1.11 1 1,1 0.001 1.37 1 1,370.001 1.25 1 1,250.001 I I 6b ( 100 1 { Heavy Rubber Clove I 1.14 1 114.001 1.14 1 114.001 1.55 1 155.001 i 6c 1 100 1 1 Light lubber Clove i 1.23 1 (23.001 1.38 1 138.001 1.51 1 151.001 I I 6d 1 50 1 1 Driving Clove 1 2.50 1 125.001 4.28 1 214.001 2.18 1 109.001 I I 6e ( 200 1 1 Eaft fork Clove ! .33 1 bb.001 1.30 ( 260.001 .63 1 126.001 I I 6f 1 40 1 1 (elders Clove I 2.67 1 111.201 5.35 1 214.001 4.18 1 167.201 I 1 I I I TOTAL ITED $6 I $ 1,652.801 1$ 21310.001 I I I$ I 11955.101 I I I I I I I I I I I ( GRAND TOTAL: I i I 1515,089.051 IS15,FOS.451 I$ 3,507.25) I l I I I SPECIAL CONDITION: (•Vest is made of I =Does not have color I`Did tot bid metal 1 I I I I I ( nylon mesh not 1 fast sipper,the bondl frame glasses. I I I I I I_I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I plastic. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I is detachable. I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 CITT OF BLYTOYN BID TABULATION ALE: L119AL SAFETT EQUIPBEIT CONTRACT 6 NUBBER: 8507 -103 7 -30 -85 2:00 P.O. page 3 I I I I TST SUPPLT, INC. { BOSS US. CO. ( A6I FASTENED 6 SUPP.1 ABERIGAS IGO I TEOI QTT MIT IDESCRIPTION I I 1 I I '_1 1 (UNIT PRICEIEIT. PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEIT. PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEIT. PRICEIUIIT PRICEIEIT. PlICEI I I i I I I I I I I ANNUAL SAFETT EQUIPOENT I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I NO BID 1 i I I CONTRACT, per 1 I I I I ! I I I I I I specifications. I I I I I I I I I la 1 345 1 I Jacket I Pants {! 5.32 ! 1,B35.401 7.67 I 2,646.151 9.25 1 31191.251 I I lb 1 345 1 1 Boots { 8.90 1 31070.501 8.83 1 3,046.351 11.25 1 31881.251 I I I I I TOTAL ITEM #1 ( IS 41905.901 IS 5,692.501 1$ 7,072.501 I I 26 1 100 1 i Hard Bats, include I ( I I 1 9.66 1 966.001 1 I 1 I I ratchet w/o iaprint I I I I I I I I I 2b 1 300 1 1 latchets I I I I I 4.62 1 1,386.001 1 i 2c I 50 I I Bnap Caps I I I I I 3.63 1 168.001 1 I 2d 1 120 1 I linter Liners 1 I I ( 1 3.22 1 386.401 1 I 1 1 1 TOTAL ITEM #2 1 IS 10 BID 1 1$ NO BID 1 I$ 2,906.401 1 I 3a 1 SO I 1 ventilation Goggles 1 1.05 1 52.501 1 1 4.55 1 227.501 I I 3b 1 25 1 1 lent. ✓r Anti - Splash Gog.l 1.32 1 33.001 I 1 4.85 1 121.251 1 I 3c 1 300 1 1 Anti - Splash Goggles 1 3.45 1 1,035.001 I 1 4.35 1 1,305.001 I I 3d 1 100 1 1 Eye Glasses 1 10.40 1 1,040.001 1 1 14.65 1 1,465.001 I I 3e 1 100 1 1 Side Prot. Eye Glasses 1 2.80 1 280.001 ( 1 3.86 1 386.001 1 I 3f 1 600 1 1 Ear Plugs i .13 1 78.001 ( 1 .34 1 100.601 ( I 3g 1 20 1 1 Head Gear 1 5.10 1 102.001 i 1 3.95 1 79.001 I 3h i 40 1 1 Face Shellds 1 1.40 1 56.001 ( 1 1.86 1 74.401 I I I I 1 TOTAL ITEO #3 1 1$ 2,676.501 IS NO BID 1 I$ 31756.951 ( I 41 1 100 ( 1 Safety Test: Slip Over 1 3.32 1 332.001 1 1 3.99 1 399.001 i { 4b 1 200 1 1 Safety Test: vest Style It' 2.60 1 560.001 1 1 1 10 BID I I I I I I TOTAL ITES #4 1 1$ 892.001 1$ NO BID I IS 399.001 1 I Sal 200 1 1 Safety Flags 1 1.60 1 360.001 I 1 2.24 1 448.001 1 I 5b 1 500 1 1 Safety Cone -w /o isprintl 3.80 1 1,900.001 I 1 S.78 1 21890.001 1 I Sc 1 100 1 1 Safety Cone -w /iaprint 1 4.05 1 405.001 I 1 1 10 BID I I I I I I TOTAL ITEO #5 I 1$ 2,665.001 I$ NO BID I IS 31338.001 1 I 6a 11000 1 1 York Gloves I =" .95 1 950.001 1.24 1 1,240.001 1.70 1 1,695.161 1 I 6b 1 100 1 i Heavy Rubber Glove ( .95 1 95.001 1.09 1 109.001 1.46 1 145.781 1 I 6c l 100 1 ( Light Rubber Glove 1 .63 ( 63.001 1.22 1 122.001 1.90 1 190.001 1 I 6d l 50 1 1 Driving Glove I 2.30 1 115.001 3.87 1 193.501 4.15 1 207.461 1 I 6e 1 200 1 1 Knit oork Glove 1 1.02 1 204.001 .56 1 112.001 .42 1 84.021 1 I 6f 1 40 1 1 Yelders Glove 1 3.75 1 150.001 3.30 1 132.001 2.39 1 93.721 1 I I I TOTAL ITEO #6 1 1$ 1,577.001 1$ 11908.501 1$ 2,416.141 1 I I I I GRAND TOTAL: 1 1$12,716.401 1$ 7,601.001 1$19,890.991 I I I I SPECIAL CONDITION: I'Does not have color I I I I I I I I i I 1 fast :ipper,the hood) I I I ( to detachable. I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 "Test is lade of I I I I I I I I I ( I plastic aesh not I I I I ( I I I I I ( nylon. I I I I I I I 1 I I I 11 "Bas a knit wrist I I I I I I I I I I I I I band, no I I I cuff. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITI OF BAITOIN BID TABULATION 1LE: AMYL SAFETY EQUIPBERT CONTRACT NOIiBER: 8507 -103 ATE: 7 -30 -85 2:00 P.d. page 4 I I I IGREAT ANERICAN FIRE ITEM QTI (UNIT IDESCRIPTION PRIC£IUXIT PRICEIEIT. PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEIT. PR..'I MIT PRICEIEIT. PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEIT. I I { I I I 1 I I ( I { ANNUAL SAFETY EQUIPNENT I 1 I •I I I ( I I I I I I I I CONTRACT, per I I I I I I I I I I I I specifications. I I I I I I I I I I 1a ( I 345 1 I I Jacket 8 Pants 1* 11.05 1 3,812.251 I I I I I I lb 1 345 1 I Boots I 13.13 I 41529.851 I I I I I I 1 1 I TOTAL IT£e #1 1 IS 6,342.101 I I I I I I 2a 1 100 1 1 Hard Hats, include 1 4.00 ( 400.001 I I I I I I I 1 I ratchet w/o iaprint I I I 2b 1 300 1 1 Ratchets I 3.68 1 1,104.001 2c I SO 1 1 Bnap Caps i 3.13 I 156.501 2d 1 120 1 1 litter Liners I 1.56 1 187.201 { I I I I I 1 1 1 TOTAL ITEN U. 1 IS 1,847.701 3a I SO I I Ventilation goggles I 1.93 1 96.501 I I I I I I 3b 1 25 1 1 Vent. I Anti — Splash gog.1 2.30 1 57.501 3c 1 300 1 { Anti - Splash goggles 1 4.32 1 1,296.001 3d 1 100 i 1 Eye classes { 11.25 I 1,115.001 I I 1 I I I It 1 100 f 1 Side Prot. Eye glasses I 4.04 1 404.001 I I ( I I I 3f 1 600 1 1 Ear Plugs 1 32.50 1 97.501 I I I I I I 3g 1 20 1 1 Head Gear I 8.06 i 161.201 I I I I I I 3h 1 40 1 1 Face Sheilds I 2.51 1 100.801 I I I I I I I I I I TOTAL ITEM #3 . I IS 3,338.501 I I I I I 4a 1 100 1 1 Safety Vest: Slip Over { 1.88 1 188.001 I I I I 1 4b 1 200 1 1 Safety Vest: Vest Style 1`t 1.86 1 376.001 I I 1 ( I I I 1 1 I TOTAL ITER #4 I IS 564.001 { 5a { 200 1 1 Safety Flags. { 2.44 ( 488.001 I ( I I I I { Sb 1 S00 ( ( Safety Cone -wh iaprint) 6.25 1 3,125.001 I I I ( I I Sc 1 100 1 { Safety Cone —w /iaprint 1 9.25 1 925.001 I I I I ( I I I 1 I TOTAL ITEN #5 I I$ 41538.001 1 61 11000 1 I Vork Gloves I 1.46 1 1,460.001 I I ( ( I I 1 6b 1 100 1 1 Heavy Rubber Glove I 1.79 1 179.001 I I I I I 1 6c 1 100 1 1 Light Rubber glove I 1.91 ( 191.001 I I I ( I I 1 6d 1 50 I 1 Driving Glove I 3.73 I 186.501 I I I I I I 1 6e 1 200 1 1 Knit lark clove ( 2.25 1 450.001 ( ( ( I ( I 16f 1 40 1 1 lelders glove 1 5.08 1 203.201 I I I I TOTAL ITEN #6 ( IS 2,669.701 I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I GRLXD TOTAL: I I 1 1 I 8511,300.001 I I ( I I SPECIAL COXDI7I0K: I *Does tot have eight I I I I I I I I I i I I point suspension. I I I I I' =Vest is lade of I I I I I I I I I I I I plastic aesh hot I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I nylon. I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I Attachment "D" CITY OF BAYTOWN BID TABULATION ITLI ANNUAL DATA PROCESSING PAPER CONTRACT NUMBER: 18506 -97 kTE: 7 -30 -85 2:00 P.M. ! ! ! !BOWATER COKPUTER FORK! THE REIN COMPANY ! ORIGANI lMOORE BUSINESS FORKS ! ITEK1 QTY !UNIT !DESCRIPTION ! ! ! ; ; !UNIT PRIM EXT. PRICE;UNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICE KNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICE! ! ! ! ANNUAL DATA PROCESSING ; ! ! ! PAPER CONTRACT, ; ! ! ! per specifications. 1 ! 300 ! M ! 1 Part, Standard 1 9.58 is 2,874.001 8.98 1$ 2,694.001 8.90 1s 1.670.001 8.80 1$ 2,640.00! ! 1 ! 14- 7/8'x11', 20 lb stock! 2 ! 80 1 M 1 2 Part, Standard 1 22.74 is 1,819.201 19.90 1s 1,592.001 19.50 1s 1,560.001 17.37 1$ 1,389.601 1 1 1 14- 7/8'x11', 15 lb stock! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 3 1 20 1 K ! 4 Part, Standard 1 48.33 1s 966.601 44.42 is 888.401 41.50 is 830.001 39.30 1$ 786.001 1 1 ! 14 -7 /8'X11', 15 lb stock! It ! ! It ; ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 4 1 75 1 K 1 1 Part, White 1 6.82 is 511.501 6.57 11 492.751 6.50 1s 487.501 5.92 1$ 444.001 ! ! ! 9-1/2'X11', 20 lb stock 1 ; 1 1 ; ; ; ; ; It 1 11 ! ! ! TOTAL BID: ! 1s 6,171.301 1; 5,667.151 !s 5,547.501 is 5,259.601 I I DELIVERY: 1 ! 7 DAYS ! 1 3 DAYS 1 1 2 DAYS 1 1 48 HOURS 1 CITY OF BAYTOWN PAGE 2 610 TABULATION 'ITLE: ANNUAL DATA PROCESSING PAPER CONTRACT ID NUMBER: 18506 -97 ATE: 7 -30 -85 2:00 P.K. a Nil DATA DOCUMENTS = MOORE PAPER COMPANY ; RALPH SCHUTZMAM { CURTIS 1000 ; ITEM; QTY ;UNIT ;DESCRIPTION ;UNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICE,EXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICE!EXT. PRICE;UHIT PRICEIEXT. PRICEI —1--20-11 I It ; 1 1 1 i i i = , 1 ! 1 ANNUAL DATA PROCESSING 1 ; 1 ; I ; ; 1 NO BID 1 I 1 I PAPER CONTRACT, It 1 I ; I I I per specifications. ' I ; I It 1 11 l ; 300 1 M I 1 Part, Standard ; 8.12 1i 2,436.401 23.25 1s 2,096.25; 14.17 1s 4,251.00; 1 1 14- 7/8'x11', 20 lb stock' ; i ; ' 2 1 80 1 K 1 2 Part, Standard 1 16.08 IS 1,446.401 28.53 is 1,766.861 34.00 1; 2,120.001 1 1 14- 7 /82xll', 15 lb stock) 1 ' to ; ; ; It ; 1 I 1 It 1 I It ; 1 1 1 It 1 3 1 20 1 K 1 4 Part, Standard I 41.69 IS 833.801 31.9S 1$ 958.501 69.08 1$ 1,727.001 1 1 114- 7/8'x11', 15 lb stock! 1 4 ; 75 1 K 1 l Part, White 1 6.04 1$ 453.001 1531 1i 465.301 10.17 1$ 762.751 1 I 9- 1/2'xll', 20 lb stock 1 1 1 1 1 It 1 ; 1 1 ! 1 TOTAL BID: 1 1; 5,169.201 1$ 6,098.911 1$ 9,460.751 1 1 ! = 1 1 DELIVERY: I 12-5 DAYS 1 I 1 1 2 DAYS 1 1 1 Attachment IIE11 CITY OF BAYTOWN BID TABULATION TITLE: ANNUAL STORAGE BATTERY CONTRACT 81 BER: 8507 -96 DATE: 7 -31 -85 2:00 P.K. 1 VONCO STARTER SERV. ; AUTO PARTS CO. ; TED'S SUPPLY 1 R. P. M. INC. ; 1ITEM1 QTY ;UNIT !DESCRIPTION. 1 1 1 1 !UNIT PRICUEXT. PRIMUNIT PRICE!EXT. PRIMUNIT PRICEMT. PRIMUNIT PRICQEXT. PRICE; I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 = 1 ► 1 1 1 !ANNUAL STORAGE BATTERY ! 1 ! ! ! 1 1 ! ! ; !CONTRACT . 0 1 1 ! ! 1 = 1 1 I 1 I ,per specifications. I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 24 1 eachlType Delco Freedom 8360 1 40.94 1S 982.561 46.95 1i 1,126.801 50.60 1f 1,214.401 34.82 11 835.681 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 ! 28 1 eachlType Delco Freedom 8960 1 49.49 1S 1,385.721 55.95 11 1.566.601 69.10 1$ 1,934.801 49.04 13 1,373.121 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 3 1 10 1 eachlType Kopar 1 41.13 1s 471.301 55.95 1= 559.50! 69.95 1s 699.501 45.45 1$ 454.501 1 ► I 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 4 1 10 1 eachlType 40 1 102.96 1f 1,029.601 136.90 3 1,369.001 151.15 :1 1,511.50! 92.48 i1 924.801 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S 1 10 1 eachlType SD ! 120.46 IS 1,204.601 163.50 1S 1,635.001 182.11 Ii 1,821.701 112.22 11; 1,122.201 I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 t 1 f 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 6 1 20 1 eachlType 77 ! 49.49 1S 989.801 55.95 Ii 1,119.001 69.95 1S 1,399.001 1 NO BID 1 I 1 1 1 1 I ! ! TOTAL: 1 1 1 :S 1 6.063.58; I :i 1 7.375.901 1 1i 1 81580.90! 1 1 4,710.30 1 1 ! 1 DELIVERY: 1 1 15 DAYS 1 ! 24 HOURS 1 1 1 DAY 1 1 4 DAI.: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ► 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ► 1 1 ( 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 f 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 t 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 t I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 ► 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 t 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 ( ► 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 f 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Attachment '�-" CITY OF BAYTOWN BID TABULATION TITLE: ANNUAL CRUSHED CONCRETE FLEXIBLE BASE MATERIAL 810 NUMBER: 18507 -98 DATE: 8 -1 -65 2:00 P.M. 1 1 1 1 1 HOUSTON CRUSHED CONCI CONCRETE RECYCLING ; PARKER BROTHERS 1 ANAHUAC TOYING ; 11TEM1 QTY !UNIT !DESCRIPTION It I 1 1 1 1 ^1 1 1 !UNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICE! 1 1 !6000 !TONS 1 ANNUAL CRUSHED CONCRETE 1 12.00 1 =72,000.001 11.06 1$66,360.001 NO BID 1 1 NO SIDI 1 ! ! 1 1 FLEXIBLE BASE MATERIAL, 1 1 1 1 ! 1 ! 1 ! per specifications. 11 , , It , It , 1 1 I ! DELIVERY: 1 24 HOURS 1 1 24 HOURS 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I