Loading...
1985 05 23 CC Minutes50523 -1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN May 23, 1985 The City Council of the City of Baytown, Texas, met in regular session on Thursday, May 23, 1985, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the Baytown City Hall with the following attendance: Fred T. Philips Jimmy Johnson Perry M. Simmons Ron Embry Roy L. Fuller Gerald Dickens Emmett 0. Hutto Fritz Lanham Larry Patterson Randy Strong Lynda Kilgore Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Mayor City Manager Assistant City Manager City Attorney Deputy City Clerk The meeting was called to order with a quorum present. The invocation was offered by Councilman Johnson, afterwhich the following business was conducted: Consider Minutes for the Regular Meeting Held May 9, 1985 Councilman Philips moved to approve the minutes for the meeting held May 9, 1985; Councilman Johnson seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Embry, Fuller and Dickens Mayor Hutto Nays: None Receive Petitions None were presented. Consent Agenda The Administration requested that Item a be removed from the consent agenda for consideration at a future meeting. Council considered the consent agenda as follows: b. Proposed Ordinance No. 50523 -3, will award the bid for the medical communications system. Bids were mailed to three vendors; two proposals were received. General Electric submitted the low bid of $27,551. 50523 -2 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - May 23, 1985 If you recall the city will be purchasing only a portion of this equipment. We will purchase a base station /repeater, a portable hand -held radio, and a desk top control station. The total obli- gation of the city is $16,727. The three hospitals and the Beach City Emergency Corps will be purchasing the other items on this contract. These other items are within the price estimates given to these entities. We recommend the low bidder, General Electric Mobile Communications Division be awarded this contract. c. Proposed Ordinance No. 50523 -4, will award the contract for the 1985 Sidewalk Construction. Bids were mailed to 15 vendors and seven bids were received. Richarte Construction submitted the low bid of $37,489. We recommend the low bidder, Richarte Construction, be awarded this contract. d. Proposed Ordinance No. 50523 -5, will award the contract for the Lee Drive sidewalk. Bids were mailed to 13 vendors and six bids were received. Richarte Construction submitted the low bid of $8,945.60. We recommend the low bidder, Richarte Construction, be awarded this contract. e. Proposed Ordinance No. 50523 -61 will award the bid for the purchase of industrial tractors. Bids were mailed to fifteen vendors and six proposals were received. Baytown Air Cooled Engine submitted the low bid of $20,512. We recommend the low bidder, Baytown Air Cooled Engine, be awarded this contract. f. Proposed Ordinance No. 50523 -7, will award the bid for the purchase of flail mowers. Bids were mailed to 14 vendors. Five proposals were received. Baytown Air Cooled Engine submitted the low bid of $9,800. We recommend the low bidder, Baytown Air Cooled Engine, be awarded this contract. g. Proposed Ordinance No. 50523 -81 will award the bid for the purchase of a mosquito sprayer. Bids were sent to ten vendors and two proposals were received. Van Waters & Rogers submitted the low bid of $4,806. We recommend the low bidder, Van Waters & Rogers, be awarded this contract. 50523 -3 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - May 23, 1985 h. Proposed Ordinance No. 50523 -9, will authorize final payment to Angel Brothers Enterprises for construction of North Main water and sanitary sewer lines. Angel Brothers Enterprises has completed this project to the satisfaction of the city's Engineering Department. The original contract price was $52,103. The contractor to date has earned $46,225.79 and has received no payment. We recommend the total amount earned, $46,225.79, be paid to Angel Brothers Enterprises. i. Proposed Ordinance No. 50523 -10, will authorize the final payment to Utilities Unlimited for Loop 201 Utility Adjustments. Utilities Unlimited has completed this project in accordance with the plans and specifications. The original contract price was $170,266.95. The contractor has completed the work for $141,860.84 and has been paid $115,942.75. We recommend that final payment of $25,918.09 be made to Utilities Unlimited. j. Proposed Ordinance No. 50523 -11, will authorize final payment to Triple G Roofing for reroofing of the Community Building. Enclosed in the agenda packet is a copy of a letter from Jan Lammers which indicates that as of Monday, May 20, 1985, the project is approximately 98% complete with a few scuppers to install and final graveling of the high roof remaining. Mr. Lammers recommends the city approve final payment to the contractor, Triple G Roofing, releasing all but $2,000 to him at this time. The remaining money owed the contractor will be released to him upon receipt of his release of liens and 100% completion. At the time these items are taken care of the remaining $2,000 will be paid to the contractor. We recommend a payment to Triple G Roofing of $12,025 with authorization to pay the remaining $2,000 upon 100% completion and release of all liens. k. Proposed Resolution No. 915, will authorize the City of Baytown to apply to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for 1985 Community Development Block Grant Funds. This proposal for block grant funds will be the seventh application submitted to HUD by the City of Baytown. This proposal is in the amount of $801,978. It is broken down as follows: 50523 -4 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - May 23, 1985 Streets and Drainage $396,978 Housing Rehabilitation 270,000 Project Lifeline 50,000 Contingency 20,000 Administration 110,000 This proposal has been reviewed and approved by the Community Development Advisory Committee. We recommend approval of Proposed Resolution No. 915. 1. Council is asked to consider approving the request of L. W. Jones for water service on the west side of Sjolander Road in the 5600 block. The city has a 12" water line on the west side of Sjolander and can provide the service simply by making a long tap. Mr. and Mrs. L. W. Jones are aware of all fees in regard to this water service. We recommend approval of the request of L. W. Jones for water service on the west side of Sjolander Road in the 5600 block. Councilman Johnson moved to adopt the consent agenda; Councilman Dickens seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Embry, Fuller and Dickens Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 4152 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF GENERAL E: COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION FOR THE PURCHASE OF CATIONS SYSTEMS AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF TWENTY -SEVEN THOUSAND FIFTY -ONE AND N01100 ($27,551.00) DOLLARS. No. 50523 -3) ORDINANCE NO. 4153 LECTRIC MOBILE MEDICAL COMMUNI- BY THE CITY OF FIVE HUNDRED (Proposed Ordinance AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AND ATTEST TO A CONTRACT WITH RICHARTE CONSTRUCTION FOR THE 1985 SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION; MAKING OTHER PROVISIONS RELATED THERETO; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. (Proposed Ordinance No. 50523 -4) ORDINANCE NO. 4154 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AND ATTEST TO A CONTRACT WITH RICHARTE CONSTRUCTION FOR LEE DRIVE SIDEWALK; MAKING OTHER PROVISIONS RELATED THERETO; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. (Proposed Ordinance No. 50523 -5) 50523 -5 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - May 23, 1985 ORDINANCE NO. 4155 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF BAYTOWN AIR COOLED ENGINE FOR THE PURCHASE OF TWO INDUSTRIAL TRACTORS AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF TWENTY THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED TWELVE AND N01100 ($20,512.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 50523 -6) ORDINANCE NO. 4156 AMIN AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE ENGINE FOR THE PURCHASE OF THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED AND (Proposed Ordinance No. 50 BID OF BAYTOWN AIR COOLED FLAIL MOWERS AND AUTHORIZING BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF NINE N01100 ($9,800.00) DOLLARS. 523 -7) ORDINANCE NO. 4157 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF VAN WATERS AND ROGERS FOR THE PURCHASE OF A MOSQUITO SPRAYER AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF FOUR THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED AND SIX ($4,806.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 50523 -8) ORDINANCE NO. 4158 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING FINAL PAYMENT TO ANGEL BROTHERS ENTERPRISES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NORTH MAIN AND SANITARY SEWER LINES; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. (Proposed Ordinance No. 50523 -9) ORDINANCE NO. 4159 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING FINAL PAYMENT TO UTILITIES UNLIMITED FOR THE LOOP 201 UTILITY ADJUSTMENTS; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. (Proposed Ordinance No. 50523 -10) ORDINANCE NO. 4160 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING FINAL PAYMENT TO TRIPLE G ROOFING FOR THE REROOFING OF THE COMMUNITY BUILDING; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. (Proposed Ordinance No. 50523 -11) RESOLUTION NO. 915 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, AUTHORIZING APPLICATION TO THE U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT FOR THE 1985 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. For bid tabulations, see attachments "A" through "F." 50523 -6 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - May 23, 1985 Bill McElhannon, Chairman of the Baytown Transit Committee, Will Appear Mr. Lanham stated that this committee was appointed several months ago to make this study and that he could not think of any committee that has worked harder, gathered more information and gone into an issue in more detail than this one has. They deserve our commendation. Mayor Hutto and Council stated that they share Mr. Lanham's opinion and appreciate the work the committee has done. Mr. McElhannon stated that several weeks ago the committee presented a report to Council on the study that the committee did on the HGAC Report. He stated that this report concerns what the committee has done since that time. Mr. McElhannon stated that the committee feels that the only type of transportation that stands any reasonable chance of breaking even is a park and ride facility. Several other types of transportation were presented in the study, but the committee doesn't feel that they stand a good chance of breaking even. He stated that they had investigated several possibilities of the park and ride facility. One was a temporary facility on leased property, another was a permanent facility on purchased property, and several stops at existing parking lots. The committee has also looked at private operators versus METRO. They have deter- mined that the best location for a park and ride facility is near I -10 east of the San Jacinto, and preferably in the Thompson Road area. From there the park and ride facility could proceed non -stop to the Houston area, down Main Street to Calhoun, stopping at every other intersection. The committee feels that this schedule would permit the facility to start with three buses and that they would arrive in downtown Houston between seven and eight o'clock in the morning, and leave in the afternoon between 4:15 and 5:15, thirty minute intervals. Mr. McElhannon stated that the public input meeting which was held was almost a disaster, with more committee members there than public. The committee felt that maybe there was too much apathy in Baytown for the system. But after the article appeared in the newspaper there was tre- mendous response by phone calls and by attendance at subsequent meetings. At this point Mr. McElhannon reviewed the study, which is attached to the minutes as Attachment "G" with Council. After the study was reviewed with council, Mr. McElhannon stated that he would like to thank the committee members and to make a point to council that it was fairly urgent that something be done immediately because the funds that are available now from UMPTA may not be available in the future. He stated that in effect, we need to get on with the project or abandon it. 50523 -7 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - May 231 1985 Councilman Johnson stated that his main objection to this is that it was soundly defeated by the voters several months ago, and he felt that the majority had spoken at that time. He stated that he did not feel that a few should be subsidized by all the taxpayers. Councilman Johnson stated that we are in a budget pinch and that revenues are down and he can't see getting into a situation that would obligate a hundred or two hundred thousand dollars for something that may not work. He stated that this is nothing against the committee but against mass transit. Mr. McElhannon stated that the defeat for participation with METRO was for a one percent tax, which amounted to four million dollars. He stated that at this point, after the first expenditures, you're talking about maybe thirty thousand a year as opposed to four million. Councilman Philips reminded council that that vote took place not several months ago, but in 1978, and that times have changed since then. Councilman Fuller stated that he wanted to take a positive attitude toward this report and schedule a work session to discuss this in more detail. A work session was scheduled for June 13, 1985, at 5:00 p.m. At this point Mr. Harry K. Johnson addressed council stating that he represented a group of people very interested in the park and ride facility, and hoped that Council would support this facility. Mr. Johnson stated that he would attend the work session. Senator Gene Green Appeared Mayor Hutto recognized Senator Gene Green who appeared before Council to thank Baytown for its support and to invite everyone to attend the swearing -in ceremony in Austin on Monday, May 27th. G. B. Chatham Will Appear Mr. G. B. Chatham appeared before council to express a grievance that he has concerning the ordinance which regulates animals running at large. His main concern was that he was ticketed for allowing his dog to run at large, without a leash, even though it was in his yard. He stated that this was his private property and that he doesn't want the ordinance changed as far as animals running at large, but does want his private property protected. Council decided to put an item on a future agenda to amend the animal control ordinance. 50523 -8 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - May 23, 1985 Irving Abrams Appeared Mr. Abrams had appeared before Council several weeks ago to inform Council that he was purchasing the old Brunson Theater, renovating it, and would have it open by September 2, 1985, with quality entertainment. He wanted to inform council that the September 2, 1985, opening date is un- realistic at this time because of some legal problems. Mr. Abrams stated that the new opening date will be Christmas, and that he will address Council again in the future with a more definite date. Consider the Downtown Action Committee's request for variance to Section 17 -42, Consumption of alcoholic beverages prohibited in certain areas Mr. Lanham stated that council had been provided with a letter from Dr. Pat Mahan, president of the Downtown Action Committee, explaining that they actually want two variances. One concerning alcoholic beverages, and the other, parking after 10:00 p.m. on Texas Avenue. The committee is planning an activity on Texas Avenue on August 29, 1985, and would like to have a variance on these two ordinances. Mr. Lanham stated that these two ordinances make no provision for a variance, but he would like to put an item on the next agenda that would amend these ordinances so that council could grant variances on a case by case request. Also, put this item on the next agenda so that the Downtown Action Committee's request can be granted. Consider Fire Station Location Plan Mr. Lanham stated that the 1981 Bond Program included funds for two fire stations -- one to be constructed in the northern part of the city, in the vicinity of Garth Road and Lynchburg -Cedar Bayou and Baker. The other one to be constructed in the southern part of the city would result from the combining of two existing stations - -one located on Ward Road and one located on South Main. Following the approval of the bonds the Council authorized to have a fire station location study made, and in a work session several months ago a report on the results of that study were pre- sented. Mr. Lanham stated that one of these two stations was to include offices for the administrative personnel and a garage for the repair of fire equipment. Larry Patterson, reviewed the results of the study with council and answered questions from council. They were presented with a memorandum which is attached to the minutes as Attachment "H." Mr. Ed Russell, representing the Baytown Professional Fire Fighter's Association, addressed council. He stated that they were concerned about some of the terminology used in the memorandum, specifically where the word consolidation is used. He stated that two fire stations are not being combined, two pieces of fire equipment are not being put together in a single fire station, but fire equipment is being eliminated. He stated that the fire protection system in the city is being taken away from, not 50523 -9 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - May 23, 1985 added to. Mr. Russell stated that the city is growing, and the fire department is not keeping up, and that this organization is concerned about this. Mr. Russell stated that his organization would like for council to contact the State Board of Insurance to conduct a detailed critique of the fire department with emphasis on equipment, man power, and location of fire stations. He stated that the fire stations are receiving phone calls from citizens expressing concern over the possibility of some of these stations being closed. He feels that before the decisions are made there should be some citizen input. Mayor Hutto appointed Councilmen Philips and Johnson, along with Larry Patterson, three representatives from the fire department, representatives from the volunteer fire department and three citizens to work with the State Board of Insurance in preparing this report. Consider Selection of Architect for Fire Station Council was not ready on this item. Consider Authorization to Request Proposals for Drainage Plan Mr. Lanham stated that council was provided with a copy of a draft for requests for proposals. The proposal will be required to review Baytown's drainage policies to deter- mine what changes, if any, need to be made to provide adequate drainage criteria and standards at a level which is determined to be cost effective to the citizens of Baytown and which will provide adequate protection from flooding. Specifically, a study of current policies should be included, responsibil- ities for implementing drainage requirements, and recommen- dations as to the financing of drainage improvements. It is recommended that the study review the present requirements regarding design for the five and twenty -five year rainfall events, and also the requirement in our present ordinance that requires any development of one acre or more to provide storm water detention. The successful firm is expected to do some research on state of the art practices, standards and policies, and to include in the proposal the time required, and the cost to perform the study. Mr. Lanham reminded council that when the work session was held on this, they were asked if they wanted a very detailed guide, one actually designing and sizing storm sewers and drainage ditches, or did they want a study of what the policy should actually be, and decided on the latter. Council agreed that that was what they wanted and Councilman Fuller moved to authorize the administration to request proposals for drainage plan. Councilman Philips seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Embry, Fuller and Dickens Mayor Hutto Nays: None 50523 -10 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - May 23, 1985 Consider Authorization to Advertise for Bids for Brownwood Cleanup Mr. Lanham stated that at the last meeting council had been told that FEMA is interested in the city moving ahead on the debris cleanup on properties that the city owns in the Brownwood area. Mr. Dykes had put together the plans and specifications that council received at that meeting. Today, after a call from FEMA, some changes have been made in these specifications. He stated that the major change is that the work will be completed in sixty calendar days rather than 200 working days. In as much as FEMA is going to pay seventy percent of the cost their requests have been taken seriously. Councilman Fuller inquired if it's possible for one company to do this work in sixty days, or if more than one company would be needed. Mr. Lanham stated that the admin- istration would prefer that just one company do the job which would prevent having to oversee several contractors. Councilman Dickens moved to authorize the administration to advertise for bids for Brownwood Cleanup. Councilman Johnson seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Embry, Fuller and Dickens Mayor Hutto Nays: None Discuss Speed Limits on Baker Road and Rollingbrook Drive Mr. Lanham stated that Council needs to give adminis- tration specific guidance on this so that ordinances can be prepared and put on the next agenda. Council discussed the proposed speed limit increase on Rollingbrook Drive and decided to send this item back to the Traffic Committee for their approval. Two citizens, Mr. Stephen Donnelly and Mr. Dave Robbins addressed council to protest the increase in speed limit on Baker. Both stated they had worked accidents on Baker at all hours of the night. They felt that it would be a mistake to increase the speed limit. Mayor Hutto was in favor of the increase on Baker stating that he had received many complaints from citizens who regard this area as a "speed trap." Council asked that this item be put on the next agenda so that action could be taken. 50523 -11 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - May 231 1985 Consider Proposed Ordinance No. 50523 -1, authorizing a Contract with Harris County for Jail Services Mr. Lanham stated that this continues the contract that has been in existence for several years under which we provide jail service to the county. We received a two percent increase and the county agrees to pay $76,377.60. If prisoners are left in our jail more than twenty -four hours, we can charge them an additional amount, but the maximum amount we can charge is $77,377.60. Mr. Lanham stated that this has been a good arrangement for Baytown and the county, and the administration recommends approval. Councilman Dickens moved to authorize a contract with Harris County for Jail Service. Councilman Johnson seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Embry, Fuller and Dickens Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 4161 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST TO A CONTRACT WITH HARRIS COUNTY PROVIDING FOR JOINT PARTICIPATION BETWEEN THE CITY AND COUNTY WITH REGARD TO THE FURNISHING, MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF JOINT JAIL FACILITIES; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Consider Appointment to Auto Wrecker Committee Mr. James D. Owens, citizen, has tendered his resigna- tion to the Auto Wrecker Committee. Mr. Owens' term is due to expire in April, 1987. Members of this committee are appointed by council for terms of two years. This appoint- ment will be for the unexpired term of Mr. James Owens and will expire in April of 1987. Councilman Dickens moved to appoint Mr. William C. Staner of 1600 Woodlawn to fill the unexpired term of Mr. Owens. Councilman Johnson seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Embry, Fuller and Dickens Mayor Hutto Nays: None City Manager's Report East District Wastewater Project - These bids are due by May 30, 1985. After the bids have been received we have to have EPA and state approval before they are brought to council. It may be thirty days after this May 30, date before the bids come to council. 50523 -12 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - May 23, 1985 Capital Improvements Projects - Angel Brother's have completed the site preparation at the Airhart Park site. The curb and gutter has been completed on New Jersey and Freeman, and the construction has been completed on Stein- man, Louisiana, New Jersey and Sunset with the exception of the application of asphalt. Drainage Projects Being Done by City Forces - Arbor Street drainage has been completed and the crews are presently installing the drainage pipe in the Airhart Drive Park. Sanitary Sewer Sliplining - Phase I - Harvard Street has been completed since your last meetng which was a total of about 1500 feet of sliplining. Garage Facility - The contractor will begin the erection of steel on this facility next week. Tenth Street Detention Pond - The contractor is excavating this site, and this project is going very well. Auction - The city held an auction on May 11. This was a joint auction with Goose Creek School District and Barbers Hill School District. The city's net receipts from this auction were in excess of $58,000. RSVP - The RSVP presented council with a certificate to show their appreciation for council's support of their activities. Questions /Comments from Council Councilman Johnson stated that he had received several calls about the problem with pigeons on Sunset and also at East Texas. Mr. Lanham stated that this was one of those unfortunate problems that plague cities everywhere, and there is no simple solution to it. Recess Into Executive Session to Discuss Land Acquisition Mayor Hutto recessed into executive session to discuss land acquisition. When the open meeting reconvened, Mayor Hutto announced that no action was necessary due to the executive session. Adjourn There being no further bu=tob acted t he meeting was adjourned. Lyn Kilgore, Deputy ity Clerk Approval: �,� �) ZaLIL - - Eileen P. Hall, City Clerk CITY OF BAYTOWN BID TABULATION TLL MEDICAL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS D NUMBER: '8504 -70 ATE: 5 -14 -85 2:00 P.M. Attachment "A" ;MOTOROLA C & E INC. ; GENENERAL ELECTRIC ; ITEM 1 QTY ; UNIT ; DESCRIPTION ;UNIT PRICE :EXT. PRICE :UNIT PRICE :EXT. PRICE; MEDICAL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, per specifications. 1 1 ; EACH ; UHF Portable Two -Way Hand ; 2,600.00 1$ 2,600.00:, 3,263.00 1$ 3,263.001 Held Radio 2 ; 1 ; EACH ; UHF Mobile Two -Way Radio ; 3,600.00 ;$ 3,600.00; 3,882.00 1$ 3,882.00; It 3 4 ; EACH ; Desk Top UHF Control Station; 5,050.00 ;$20,200.00; 2.065.00 1$ 8,260.00; , I , , , , 1 1 1 1 . , 4. ; 1 ; EACH UHF Base Station /Repeater 11 11,675.00 1$11,675.00;1 11,399.00 1$11,399.00; 5 1 3 1 EACH 1 DTMF Decorders 1 975.00 1$ 2,925.001 249.00 1$ 747.001 1 1 1 TOTAL: 1 1$41,000.001 1$27,551.001 1 1 1 DELIVERY: 1 1 90 days 1 1 90 days 1 1 1 1 PRICES FIRM: 1 1 45 days 1 1 30 days 1 i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i - 1 1 We mailed bids to 3 vendors.] 0 CITY OF BAYTOWN BID RESULTS TITLE: 1985 Sidewalk Construction BID No. 8502 -14 DATE: May 17, 1985 @ 11 a.m.= C O N T R A C T O R Angel Brothers Enterprises Baytown Trucking Conrad - Walsh, Inc. Forde Construction Hamilton Construction Morin Concrete Paving Nelson, R.L. Construction Richarte Construction S &R Construction Sans /Par Savell Contractors Sheats, Jerry Interests Shirley Construction Solesbee Construction Vega Construction Attachment "B" A M O U N T $ 49,700 $ 73,000 $ 67,500 $ -0- $ 45,100 $ -0- $ -0- $ 37,600 $ -0- A $ -0- $ -0- $ 81,506 $ 71,260 M Attachment "C" CITY OF BAYTOWN BID RESULTS TITLE: Lee Drive Sidewalk CDBG No. B- 83 -MJ -48 -0033 BID No.: 8503 -21 DATE: May 17, 1985 @ 11 a.m. C O N T R A C T O R A M O U N T Angel Brothers Enterprises $ 14,562.00 Forde Construction $ -0- Hamilton Construction $ 10,722.00 Morin Concrete Paving $ -0- Nelson, R.L. Construction $ 14,568.00 Richarte Construction $ 8,945.60 S &R Construction $ -0- Sans /Par $ -0 Savell Contractors $ -0- Sheats, Jerry Interests $ -0- Shirley Construction $ -0- Solesbee Construction $ 17,716.60 Vega Construction $ 17.,760.00 CITY OF BAYTO14N BID TABULATION fIT,E C�U : IN'3TRIAL TRACTORS f'-El �NUMBER: ""'B-504-77 )ATE: 5 -15 -85 2: DO P. M. Attachment "D" TRINITY VALLEY TRACT : GOLDTHWAITE'S ' ITEM CITY UNIT DESCRIPTION i r r UNIT PRICE;EXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICE;EXT. PRICE; r r � It � 11• 1 � 1 ; 2 ; EACH ; INDUSTRIAL TRACTORS, ; 11,895.001$23,729.00; ; NO BID ; per specifications. MAKE /MODEL: i ; FORD /46105U ; DELIVERY: ; 60 DAYS ; ; i r r i i i i i i i i i i i i i i• i i i i r j i i i i i r t i :0 CITY OF BAYTOWN BID TABULATION 1TLE: INDUSTRIAL TRACTORS BID NUMBER: #8504 -77 DATE: 5 -15 -85 2:00 P.M. PAGE 2 w 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 !WATSON DISTRIBUTING PLAINS MACHINERY ; ITEM 1 QTY 1 UNIT 1 DESCRIPTION ;UNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICE WNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICE; 11 1 1 2 EACH INDUSTRIAL TRACTORS, 1 12,250.001$24,500.001 1 NO BID per specifications. i i 1 MAKE /MODEL: 1 JACOBSEN /G -20D 1 1 1 1 DELIVERY: 1 60 DAYS i i i i i i i i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 . _ , .... CITY OF BAYTOWN BID TABULATION TITLE: INDUSTRIAL TRACTORS 31D NUMBER: 48504 -77 DATE: 5 -15 -85 2:00 P.M. PAGE 3 !LANSDOWNE -MOODY CO. ; BROOKSIDE EQUIPMENT ; ITEM ; QTY 1 UNIT ; DESCRIPTION ; 1 ! !UNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICESEXT. PRICE! r r r r r r r r 1 ! 2 ! EACH 1 INDUSTRIAL TRACTORS, ! 11,477.00!$22,954.001 13,735.60!$27,471.201 • ! ! ! per specifications. MAKE /MODEL: 1 FORD 46101 ! JOHN DEERE /2350 ! 1 1 ! DELIVERY: i I TRACTOR - STOCK 1 60 DAYS 1 1 1 ! ! I 1 TRACTOR -60 -90 DAYSI ! 1 r r r r r ! ! ! ! 1 I ALTERNATE: 1 ! 1 ! ! ! ! JOHN DEERE 1650 1 1 1 1 ! ! ! 13,634.591$27,269.18! • r i r r r r r , i i i i i i i i r i r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r i i 1 i i i i i r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r i i i i r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r t r r r r r r r r r r r i i i i i r r r r r r r r 1 i i i i r r r r r r r r r i r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r i i i r r r i i i r r r r i r r r CITY OF BAYTOWN PAGE 4 BID TABULATION TITLE: `INDUSTRIAL TRACTORS BID NUMBER: 48504 -77 DATE: 5 -15 -85 2:00 P.M. IWI i t i i i i ;JIM BALL INTERNAT'L ; BAYTOWN AIR COOLED ITEM ; QTY ; UNIT ; DESCRIPTION ;UNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICE'UNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICE; i i i i i i i i 1 ; 2 ; EACH INDUSTRIAL-TRACTORS, ; 10,990.00;$21,980.00; 10,256.00;$20,512.00; per specifications. ; 11 MAKE /MODEL: ; CASE -IH 584 D ; JOHN OEERE /1450 ; DELIVERY: ; 30 DAYS ; 30 DAYS ; ; i i i i i i i i i t i i i i I . CITY OF BAYTOW'N BID TABULATION ITLE: FLAIL MOWERS NUMBER: #8504 -78 ATE: 5 -15 -85 2:00 P.M. Attachment "E" :BAYTOWN AIR COOLED ; TRINITY VALLEY ; ITEM 1 QTY 1 UNIT 1 DESCRIPTION 1 1 1 !UNIT PRICE;EXT. PRICE;UNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICE: I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 l ! 4 1 EACH : FLAIL MOWERS, 1 2,450.00 1$ 9,800.001 1 NO BID 1 1 1 1 per specifications. 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • MAKE /MODEL: ! ! 1 DANDL /I 74 ! 1 ! 1 I 1 1 1 DELIVERY: 1 30 DAYS 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! I I 1 1 I 1 r 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I •• 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 t I l 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 11 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 11 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ( 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I t I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 i 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I t CITY OF BAYTOWN BID TABULATION TITLE: FLAIL MOWERS BID NUMBER: ##8504 -78 DATE: 5 -15 -85 2:00 P.M. •o PAGE 2 1GOLDTHWAITE'S OF TX 1 PLAINS MACHINERY ITEM ; QTY ; UNIT ; DESCRIPTION ;UNIT PRICE!EXT. PRICEIUNIT PRICE;EXT. PRICE; 1 ; 4 ; EACH ; FLAIL MOWERS, ; 2,488.00 ;$ 9,952.00; ; NO BID per specifications. + 1 I 1 MAKE /MODEL: ; VRISIMO MIGHTY MAX DELIVERY: ; 30 GAYS ; tI 1 1 1 1 1 + 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 + + t 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 ( 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 . ... ......... TITLE: FLAIL MOWERS BID NUMBER: 0504 -78 . CITY OF BAYTOWN DATE: 5 -15 -85 2:00 P.M. BID TABULATION PAGE 3 :WATSON DISTRIBUTING ; JIM BALL INTERNAT'L ; ITEM ; QTY UNIT ; DESCRIPTION ;UNIT PRICE;EXT. PRICE WHIT PRICEIEXT. PRICE; 1 ; 4 ; EACH ; FLAIL MOWERS, *2,250.00 :$ 9,000.00; ; NO BID ; per specifications. ; 1 1 1 1 MAKE /MODEL: ; JACOBSEN /74t1 FLAIL ; 1 1• I r DELIVERY: ; 30 DAYS 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 *MOWER IS OFFSET AND t 1 + r SPECS REQUIRE ; CENTER MOUNT. ; l 1 t r i 1 i i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i i i 1 1 1 1 ( 1 r t 1 1 1 1 1 i i i i 1 i i I 1 I 1 l 1 1 1 1 1 I l 1 j i i 1 1 1 i 1 i 1 1 1 I 1 1 I �• 1 1 I 1 1 1 I t 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 r 1 1 1 1 I I ( 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 ( 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ( 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i i i i i I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I r I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 r 11 I \ \l 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 I 1 l l 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ( 1 1 1 1 r 1 I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r CITY OF BAYTOWN BID TABULATION TITLE: FLAIL MOWERS BID NUMBER: #8504 -78 DATE: 5 -15 -85 2:00 P.M. PAGE 4 I t 1 1 ;LANSDOWNE -MOODY CO. I BROUK51UL LQU1N►tNi ; 1 ITEM 1 ; QTY I ; UNIT 1 ; DESCRIPTION t 1 1 ;UNIT PRICE;EXT. PRICEWNIT PRICE;EXT. PRICE; 1 1 1 ! 4 1 ; EACH 1 ; FLAIL MOWERS, 1 1 ; 2,469.00 ;$ 9,876.00; I 1 *1,933.68;$ 7,734.72; 1 per specifications. MAKE /MODEL: ; MOTT -74 /SUPER HVY OTY DELIVERY: ; STOCK TO 10 DAYS ; 1 1 I I 1 *MOWER 1S OFFSET AND ; SPECS REQUIRE CENTER; 1 ; MOUNT. 1 i 1 i 1 i t i i i i i t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 j I I 1 1 'IT MOSQUITO SPRAYER IID NUMBER: #8504 -75 )ATE: 5 -17 -85 2:00 P.M. CITY OF BAYTOWN BID TABULATION ITEM QTY ; UNIT DESCRIPTION EACH ; MOSQUITO SPRAYER per specifications. t t DELIVERY: + t t t WARRANTY: t t t + t t + t t + + + + t t t t t + i t i i t t + + t t + + i VAN WATERS & ROGERS ; t UNIT PRICE;EXT. PRICE; t + t t 1$4,806.00 ; t 6 DAYS AMU t t � t t t + t t t i t i t i t • i r i t t t t t t t + t t t t t t + t t t Attachment "F" B 6 G COMPANY ; + UNIT PRICEIEXT. PRICE; t + + t 1$5,455.00 ; t � t + 15 DAYS +ARO ; t + 1 YEAR ENGINE ; I YEAR UNIT t + t + t , t t t i t t t + i t + c t + i + t i t t i t + t t + t t + t + + t + + i t + + t + t + + t t t + t + + t t + + + t + i i + i i t t + + t + + t i + t t + i i � W Attachment "G" BAYTOWN TRANSIT COMMITTEE REPORT MAY, 1985 By the Baytown Transit Committee and the Office of Transportation Planning Department of Planning and Traffic Baytown, Texas In cooperation with the Houston - Galveston Area Council and the Urban Mass Transit Administration The contents of this report reflect the views of the City which is responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation or the Federal Urban Mass Transit Administration. Preparation of this document was financed in part by a grant under Section 8(d) of the Urban Mass Transit Act of 1964, as amended. BAYTOKN TRANSIT COMMITTEE REPORT INTRODUCTION: The Baytown Transit Committee has completed it's assignment to study the need for and the feasibility of implementing some type of transit for Baytown. It is the consensus of this committee that a park and ride service designed to transport Baytonians to downtown Houston would be an asset to the community in that it would: -- make Baytown a more desirable place to live. -- improve employment opportunities. -- provide a link with other transportation facilities. -- provide much needed transportation for social services and medical needs. Several options are available to the city for the implementation of a transit service and have been previously outlined in the "Baytown Transit Feasibility Study" and in the "Baytown Transit Committee Interim Report ". This paper will focus on new developments and on the Committee's recommendations. PARKING LOT_ Two of the possible options available for the procurement of a parking area are described below. Option I: This option would involve leasing approximately 7 acres at the Decker Drive -In for at least a 2 year trial period. Improvements would be required. They would include security fencing, lights, conversion of the old ticket building to a passenger shelter, and preparation of the surface for loading, unloading and parking. Asphalt would be used to smooth (not level) the existing surface. The expenditure for this option will be $100,000 to $130,000 for the improvements made to the lot plus the cost of the lease. The improvements planned for this site would be considered maintenance instead of capital improvements, and the city would have to assume 1000 of the cost. Option II: This option would involve the purchase of approximately 3 acres of land with an option on an additional 3 acres for potential future expansion. Improvements would include a concrete surface, fence, passenger _shelters and other amenities to make it a quality parking area. Depending on the site location, the total cost for this option would be $500,000 to $600,000. However, because'the facility would be owned by the city, federal and state funds would be available. Some "old" federal funds are presently uncommitted and could be made available for this project which would cover 80% of the cost. State funding for capital improvements is also available, and could cover 13% of the total cost. This means Baytown could own a model parking site for park and ride for a $35,000 - $42,000 investment. Another possibility is that the park and ride project will qualify as a 'demonstration project' based on the - unique cooperative approach of 4 governmental agencies. With this approach, U+1TA would provide 80% funding from Section 6 of the Urban Mass Transit Act and the state might provide more than the usual 13 %. In addition, Section 6 funds may be used for initial promotion of the bus service. While either possibility in this option provides a better result for less Baytown money, both in the start -up phase and in long term operation, it is necessary to be aware of the consequences if the bus service is abandoned after a trial period. The Urban Mass Transit Administration normally depreciates a capital investment over a period of 20 years. If use of the facility for transit is discontinued prior to 100% depreciation, the city would be obligated to the Administration for the undepreciated value of it's investment. However, any creditable use of the facility for transit would count, including operation of only one or two buses a day. Parking Lot Operation Costs: Electricity for lights, maintenance and marginal costs for police patrols, administration, etc. could be $60.00 per day. For Option I the lease cost would be added. hbile it is not expected to be necessary, there is the possibility that full time security personnel would be needed. If so, this would cost about $100.00 per day. METRO's experience indicates that full time security is not necessary and is not provided at their comparable lots. Rl1S SFRVICF With the present budget situation in {Washington, it is very unlikely that funds to offset operating losses will be available to Baytown or to any other city. Therefore, the committee has been looking at ways to make the service cost effective and potentially self - supporting. Procurement of Service: After consideration of the various possibilities postulated in the "Baytown Transit Feasibility Study" and talking to several private bus companies, the committee decided to look at the option of contracting for service with MTRO. City Council approved a resolution requesting the METRO board to review it's policy and let us know if METRO .would consider such a contract. The METRO board agreed to consider the negotiation of a contract and we have been working with METRO staff since then. They have been very helpful in designing a service that would fill the basic demand at a minimum cost. There are several advantages for Baytown if we contract through METRO, even though MTRO will subcontract the service with a private bus company. These advantages include: -- METRO staff will handle the administrative work of preparing bid specifications and contract letting for bus service. They have trained staff in place doing this for their own contract service. -- METRO street monitors will check the arrival and departure time of each bus on a daily basis. These monitors are already in place and the Baytown buses will add little effort to their workload. -- METRO staff is very helpful -and willing to share the results of their many studies and surveys as well as their expertise in obtaining federal and state funding. -- Baytown's staff could not perform the administrative duties that METRO's staff will do for us without additional personnel. -- Additional non - administrative advantages include transfer privileges to other METRO routes, use of tickets and ticket books that are procured in large quantities, and sale of tickets through existing METRO outlets. The disadvantages of working with METRO must also be kept in mind. -- Foremost is that none of the agreement is definite until the METRO Board of Directors approves it, and the details have not been worked out. -- No administrative costs for the METRO staff have been included, based on our discussions with it's staff members. However, a marginal charge may be required by it's Board. Route, Schedules and Costs: The Committee favors a route originating close to the area where I -10 crosses the San Jacinto River and proceeding non -stop to downtown Houston. METRO has suggested that the-buses exit I -10 in Houston at Main St. and proceed down Main St., stopping every other block, to Calhoun St. If demand warrants the extra cost, it would be possible for one or more of the buses to continue down Main St. to the Medical Center, or to go to some other destination such as Greenway Plaza or Galleria. The Committee also recommends that service be offered only at times when demand is high and there is a good probability that the buses will be filled. Based on METRO's experience and on the input we have received from potential riders, the highest demand is for buses that will get people to their work place downtown between 7:00 and 8:00 am. Initial service could provide three daily departures with half -hour headways and with the first bus arriving downtown, shortly before 7:00 am. The first afternoon bus should probably depart downtown at 4:15. It would be necessary to use 3 buses for this service as the first bus could not return to Baytown quickly enough to make the third trip. The cost estimate for this service is $500.00 per day. Fares: It is necessary to charge a fare high enough to recover costs, but not so high as to reduce ridership. The committee, after talking to several potential riders, recommends a base fare of about $5.00 /round trip or $100.00 for a book of 40 one -way trips. Purchase of a single ticket would cost more - perhaps $3.00 for a one -way trip. A 10% discount would be given companies who participate in the METRO RideSponsor. program. Participants in this program purchase 50 or more ticket books each month. Approximately half of METRO's park and ride passengers use the RideSponsor tickets. Chart A shows the daily farebox income versus the number of riders, assuming the recommended fares and the use of discount ticket books by 50% of the riders. Chart B shows the estimated number of riders that will be using the service versus the time the service has been in operation. The probable best and worst cases along with the anticipated case are shown. Chart C shows a comparison of the est- imated costs of Option 1 and Option 2 along with advantages and disadvantages for each. A best case scenario and a worst case scenario cost estimate were prepared for the first two years of operation for each option and are included to bracket the probable Baytown liability. w A graph showing the operating costs versus the farebox income for the best case and worst case is shown in Chart D. The low income shown during the first few months of operation is due to an anticipated promotion in which ticket books will be sold at a 35% discount if purchased before a set date. All estimates used in this report are based on using this promotion. CONCLUSION: The Committee realizes that it is not really possible to know how many commuters will decide to use park and ride. However, from the study of census statistics which indicate a potential market of over 1000 Baytown area residents working in the Houston central business district, and from the response we have received from the public, we have reached the consensus that there should be least 120 daily riders after an initial start -up period. There have been 89 telephone calls from potential users, and 51 of them have been from potential daily riders. We have also received several letters and have had citizens attend our meetings. Four (4) citizens have expressed concern about a potential to sales tax, or about any tax dollars being used to support public transit for a few people. The Committee knows that it will indeed take some local money to get a park and ride service started, and it may be necessary to support it to some extent if we fail to reach the desired ridership. However, we believe that in many intangible ways which are difficult to quantify, this investment, if it can be kept at a reasonable level, will work to the overall benefit of Baytown. It has now been 2 years since work was begun on the feasibility of transit for Baytown. It is now time to decide whether funding is to be committed for the procurement of facilities and services or abandon the possiblity of public transit. This Committee is convinced that the only possible transit that can come close to being self- supporting is the plan for park and ride that has been outlined. If the City Council agrees to commit funds for the park and ride facility, it is the majority opinion of the Committee that Option 2 should be pursued because: -- It requires the lowest initial and overall investment from Baytown. -- It eliminates the possibility of excessively high lease cost in the . future. -- Urban Mass Transit funds may not be available in the future. Less land will be available as development continues in the area. -- The cost of land will probably be higher in the future than it is today. The following work should proceed immediately if the park and ride concept is approved. -- Negotiate details of agreement with METRO. -- Locate a suitable tract of land or sign a lease. -- Apply to UMTA for funds via the appro ria a channe s. $800 $700 $60C $50( $40( a F a a 0 . $301 $20' $10 0 50 IOU IDU NUMBER OF RIDERS CHART A 140 120 100 n N ..a N 80 • 0 N z 60 a :a s 4a 2C o 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 lb 16 Idu MONTHS AFTER START -UP CHART B OPTION 1 COST_ TO CITY OPTJON 2 Worst Case $ 39,000 59,000 $ 98,000 34,000 $ 132,000 ADVANTAGES -- Shortest start -up time -- Lowest initial cost to city -- Permits demonstration period -- Lowest two year cost to city -- Obligation expires at end of 2 years -- Permanent facility DISADVANTAGES -- Highest initial cost to city - -May incur $380,000 - $400,000 obligation - -Lot not permanent if service is discontinued -- Nearly all of initial investment will -- Initial cost may increase if state be lost if parking site moved funds are not - available -- Growth may be hampered ' -- Requires METRO administrative aid to - -If another area must be located after , obtain UMTA and state funds two years, UMTA funds may no longer be -- Longest start -up time available and land prices may be higher ' -- Unable to estimate subsequent years , cost without property available Note: Annual operating cost will increase under either option if full -time security is required. WART C - COMPARISON Of: OPTIONS Best Case Worst Case ' Best Case 1 INITIAL COST $130,000 $130,000 $ 39,000 OPERATION: ' 1st Year Deficit •24,000 65,000 , 18,000 TOTAL l.st YEAR COST $154,000 $195,000 ' $ 57,000 OPERATION 2nd Year Deficit 3,000 40,000 ' (3,000) TOTAL 2 Year Cost $157,000 $235,000 $ 54,000 OPTJON 2 Worst Case $ 39,000 59,000 $ 98,000 34,000 $ 132,000 ADVANTAGES -- Shortest start -up time -- Lowest initial cost to city -- Permits demonstration period -- Lowest two year cost to city -- Obligation expires at end of 2 years -- Permanent facility DISADVANTAGES -- Highest initial cost to city - -May incur $380,000 - $400,000 obligation - -Lot not permanent if service is discontinued -- Nearly all of initial investment will -- Initial cost may increase if state be lost if parking site moved funds are not - available -- Growth may be hampered ' -- Requires METRO administrative aid to - -If another area must be located after , obtain UMTA and state funds two years, UMTA funds may no longer be -- Longest start -up time available and land prices may be higher ' -- Unable to estimate subsequent years , cost without property available Note: Annual operating cost will increase under either option if full -time security is required. WART C - COMPARISON Of: OPTIONS $800 $700 $600 $500 x $40C O r N N c $30( G $201 $10' id 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 MONTHS AFTER START -UP CHART D �n 1% M E M O R A N D U M Attachment "H" May 21, 1985 TO: Fritz Lanham, City Manager FROM: Larry Patterson, Asst. City Manager SUBJECT: Fire Station Location Since it has been several months since we discussed the Fire Station Location Study with Council, and since I have looked at a number of other fire station configuration designs, I would like to review the recommendations for fire station locations and the reasoning behind these with you. As you recall, our initial discussions included the building of a fire station to the north, located in the vicinity of Garth Road or North Main and Cedar Bayou Lynchburg Road, and the consolidation of Stations No. 3 and 4 in the southeastern portion of the city. This design is consistent with the recommendations of the Capital Improvement Needs Study conducted in November of 1980. At that time the recommendation was to develop the consolidated station into the Central Fire Station complete with apparatus repair facility, administrative offices and fire alarm dispatcher, while the station to the north would conform to the 1h mile radius rule. The need study indicated that the central fire station (comprised of consolidating No. 3 and 4) would need to be built for several factors. These were: (1) to replace present Fire Station No. _3 which was erected in 1928 and is in a state of disrepair, overcrowding and energy inefficient, (2) to consolidate and eliminate the overlapping of Fire Districts No. 3 and 4 while mains -ining the essential coverage of the city, (3) to close Station No. 4 built for one man -, and housing four, with an engine room that is very small for a modern engine. (Station No. 4 is also subject to repeated flooding and backing up of sewer into the living quarters.) (4) to relieve overcrowding of the Fire Depart- ment Administration Building and to replace it with a more energy efficient building of adequate size, (5) to provide an adequate area to� perform maintenance and repair. ' of apparatus by fire department mechanic and personnel. The station to the north was to be built to provide adequate coverage in that area and to provide for coverage as our growth in the northern section of the city continues over the next four to eight years. It was felt by accomplishing this design that upon completion we would maintain the same number of five stations (5) and the same level of personnel staffing. The consolidation of Fire Station No. 3 and 4 would require no addition to the budget in terms of personnel, fuel, and utilities. This conclusion is supported by the number of fires being fought per station. Granted that Station No. 3 is one of our busiest, while Station No. 4 is one of our least called stations. For the current calendar year of 1985, Station No. 3 has been involved in 114 calls. Seventy -eight were first reponse, 36 were backup. This averages to approximately 6.57 calls per week. Station 4 has been involved in 58 calls. Forty were primary response, and 18 were backup, which averages approximately 3.35 call per week. Together this is a total of 172 calls including backups or an average of 9.92 calls per week. This is down from the 1984 figures. ....�.. In 1984 for the same period, Station No. 3 was involved in 144 calls. One hundred and ten calls were primary and 34 were backups. This averages to 8.3 calls per week. Station No. 4 was involved in 60 calls or an average of 3.46 calls per week. The two stations combined were involved in 204 calls including backups which came to an average of 11.77 calls per week. The total fire station calls for this period of 1984 were 530 calls which resulted in an average of 30.58 per week, while calls for January through April of calendar year 1985 totalled 423 or an average of 24.4 per week, which comes to an average of roughly 4.8 calls per station per week. Looking at the location study package and the land available, we now feel that it would probably better suit our needs if we altered our original proposals and sell the property which we.own at 4721 Garth Road and buy an additional parcel of land big enough to house the central fire station in the northern sector of the city. This would be complete with the fire administration building, and fire apparatus maintenance facility. We would then consolidate stations number 3 and 4 in the southeastern section of the city. We feel that this type of design construction would be more cost effective and would better fit our future needs. This recommendation is somewhat inconsistent with the one provided for by the Fire Prevention Engineering Bureau of Texas. They indicated several considerations the city should consider as follows: - .. ...... k%6 1. Adding of additional paid manning so that a minimum of four firemen including a company lofficer can remain on duty at all times with each of the suggested companies. 2. Provide the department with an additional pumper of at least 1,000 gpm capacity designed and equiped in accordance with the recommendation of the National Fire Protection Association. 3. Institute a plan for providing the department with at least one snorkel truck so that adequate ladder service and elevated stream ability will be provided for proper fire methods and rescue. 4. Improving response distances by the following: a. Erecting a new fire station in the vicinity of street intersection of Garth Road and Cedar Bayou Lynchburg Road. b. Consolidating the fire station at Main Street and Gulf Avenue and the fire station at Ward Road and Gillette Drive into one new station located in the vicinity of Highway 146 and E. Texas Avenue. C4. Establishing a new station in the vicinity of the intersection of Loop 201 and Decker Drive. d. Maintaining Station No. 2, 5 and 6. 5. To continue necessary tests to maintain that fire department equipment is up to standards in operating effectively. 6. Continue efforts to improve and expand and intensify the training program for the entire department. �o Attached you will find a copy of the entire Fire Prevention and Engineering Bureau Study. I feel that these recommendations are ones to consider if the ideal situation is what we seek. However, based upon current budget expenditures of total operating fund only of the amount of $2,926,901, and extrapolating our current fire runs through April, which would come to 1,268 calls this year, we are spending $2,308.28 per run. Based upon our current number of calls and upon costs per call, I would be unable to recommend the addition of a third fire station complete with crew and apparatus. The costs of operation of one fire station consisting of 15 people is $491,395. This does not include equipment. Based upon our Fire Station Location Design, I see that our overall average coverage on first response is 2.49 minutes with the current configuration. I have run several alternate configurations and these indicate we could with the addition of the station in the northern section of the city, and the consolidation of Station 3 and 4 maintain or better our average first response. If we located a fire station at 4721 Garth Road and one in the vicinity of Texas and Highway 146, our average first run response would be 2.54 minutes. If we kept the station to the north of 4721 Garth Road and moved our consolidated station to Ward and Tenth, we would have an average first response of 2.37 minutes. If we maintained the station to the north and located the consolidated station in the neighborhood of Fayle and Highway 146, our average covered response is 2.38 minutes. Overall, our response time is good and remains good through any of these configurations. I am providing you with a map in which the district lines are tentative based upon the final location of the fire stations. Again, it is my recommendation that we locate the central fire station in the north, sell the property at 4721 Garth, and buy an additional parcel of land to cover the additional space needed in the vicinity of Garth and N. Main and Cedar Bayou Lynchburg Road and consolidate Station number 3 and 4 in the southeastern portion of the city somewhere along Highway 146 between Ward Road and Texas Avenue. FIFE PREVENTION NAND ENGINEERING BUREAU OF TEXAS 1NDO PAcific Building, Suite 720 DALLAS, TEXAS 75201 :505 ( 214 ) 969.0330 Mr. Fritz Lanham City Manager City of Baytown P. 0. Box 424 Baytown, Texas 77520 March 7, 1985 Survey 42 -3162 City of Baytown, Texas Dear Mr. Lanham: In accordance with your request at the time of our survey of the fire defenses of Baytown, we are for;-ardirg .for your consideration our comr -ments pertaining to possible improvements in the fire defenses of your city. These comments are based upon a system c= analysis which is widely used in the insurance in As you knot, *, the survey as not for fire insurance rating purposes but to develop fire insurance underwriting information for our member and subscriber companies. Consequently, our remarks do not include all of the elements nece- ssary for an analysis by the local authorities of their overall needs and priorities. These requested comments are submitted for the sole purpose of assisting your city in planning improvements in their fire defenses in combin- ation with more specific studies of local needs by your staff and consultants. The basic guidelines used in our analysis system have been developed from a study of performance records and conditions extending over many years. The basic criteria employed in evaluating the needs of the water system and fire department is determined from a study of the structural conditions within the larger built -up districts of the city. By evaluating the size, construction, occupancy and exposures of buildings, a basic fire flow is derived, and the ability of the city's facilities are studied to determine if they can deliver the the basic fire flow for a dete .mined period of time. In your city, the basic fire flow is 4000 -gpm (5.76 million gallons per day) for a 4 -hour period. Mr. Fritz Lanham -2- 2•11arch 7, 1985 City of Baytown WATER SUPPLY For a water supply to be considered adequate under the analysis system used, it should be able to deliver the basic fire flow of 5.76 million gallons per day for a 4 -hour period and at the same time furnish consumption demands at the maximum daily rate. Since production records indicate that the maximum daily consumption has been 11.12 million gallons per day, the total rate of flow need- ed for the 4 -hour period is 16.88 million gallons per day. The system is con- sidered to be fully reliable if it can deliver the total rate of flow when certain circumstances exist which cause an interruption of normal supplies as the result of maintenance and repair work or an emergency. The more common contingencies considered are the possible loss of pumping units, the loss of electrical power supply and the loss of a water main. At present, the capacity of Baytown's supply works in conjunction with the normally available storage is 42.00 million gallons per day for the 4 -hour period but distribution capacities are deficient in some commercial areas of the city. In addition to the suggestions which follow, we are enclosing the outline of "Good Practices For Developing and Maintaining eater Systems for Fire Protection" that may be used as a guide for-future planning and operation of the system. Consideration should be given to: 1. The earliest possible completion of the proposed plans for adding an elevated water tank in the northeastern section of the city and an additional 4.00 mg ground storage tank at the B. A. W. A. treatment plant. 2. Keeping all storage units, both ground and elevated, as full as ' practicable at all times so as to be available during a fire. 3. Providing auxiliary power sources at various pumping stations so that a reasonable amount of water could be provided in the event of an area power failure or serious interruption of the overhead power service. 4. A continuing effort to improve the capacity and reliability of the distribution system by: a. Providing more looped arterial mains. b. Improved gridironing of the distribution system mains. 1°) c. Elimination of dead -end mains which serve as fire lines. • serve fire hydrants. d. Replacement of all 4 -inch �:.�ins which y Mr. Fritz Lanham -3- `;arch 7, 1985 S. Investigating the distribution system Trains. Fire flow tests made in several areas during this survey indicated that quantities were considerably less than would be expected. The poor train capacities could be due to closed or partially closed valves, tuberculation within the pipe or construction or repair of water mains in the vicinity of the tests. The following areas need ir=rediate attention: a. In the vicinity of the street intersection of Colorado and Wisconsin. b. In the vicinity of the street intersection of Maplewood and Memorial. c. In the vicinity of the street intersection of Kilgore and James. 6. Instituting a suitable preventative maintenance program to improve the condition of the valves and hydrants. These should be established in conformance with ALMA, guidelines and include as a minimum. a. At least annual operation of all valves with the more important valves being inspected at least semi - annually. b. At least semi - annual inspection and testing of all fire hydrants and at least annual servicing of the hydrants. c. Records should be - maintained of all inspections and repairs. 7. Replacing a1L 2 -way fire hydrants with standard 3 -way hydrants. 8. Providing hydrants at 300 to 375 -foot intervals around and through shopping centers, commercial and institutional areas. The variation in spac- ing is dependent upon the fire potential of the areas. Hydrants should be located at street intersections and spaced at not over 500 -foot intervals along streets in one and two family areas. 9. Taintaining current, complete records of the water system, including an up -to -date map of the distribution system showing mains, hydrants, and valves. FIRE DEPAR11 ENT In order to provide a reasonable level of protection under the analysis system used, a fire department should have sufficient apparatus of proper types and suitably located, adequate personnel who are properly trained, and reliable means for receipt of alarms and dispatching equipment. The apparatus needs of your city to satisfy this criteria could be reasonably satisfied at the present time by maintaining six engine companies and two ladder companies in service with one pumper and one aerial ladder in reserve. Consideration should be given to:'- :r. Fritz Lanham -4- March 7, 1 °85 10. Adding additional paid manning so that a minimum of four firemen, including a company officer, can be maintained on duty at all tildes with each of the suested companies. Some of the additional personnel necessary to rain- cc minimum company assignments during vacations, sick leave and other days oaf could also be used for administrative, training, fire prevent-ion or main- tenance duties as available. 11. Providing the department with an additional pumper of at least 1000 - gpm capacity designed and equipped in accordance with the recommendations of the National Fire Protection Association. 12. Instituting a plan for providing the department with at least one snorkle truck (minimum 85 -foot aerial ladder) so that adequate ladder service and elevated stream ability will be provided for proper £ire methods and rescue. In the near future a,second snorkle truck will be needed as tae city continues to develop. 13. Improving response distances by the following (listed in their order of importance): a. Erecting a new fire station in the vicinity of the street inter- section of Garth Road and Lynchburg Cedar Bayou Road. This station should house both an engine and a snorkle. b. Consolidating the fire station at Main Street and Gulf Avenue and the fire station at Ward Road and Gillette Drive into one'new station located in the vicinity of Highway 146 and E. Texas Avenue. This station should house both an engine and a snorkle. c. Establishing a new station in the vicinity of the street inter- section of Loop 201 and Decker Drive. This station should house an engine and the existing 100 -foot aerial ladder truck. d. Stations 2, 5 and 6 should remain in the same locations and each house one engine company. 14. Continuing to test all pumpers annually and after major repairs in accordance with service tests recomended by the National Fire Protection Association. Pumper test records should be maintained•on file for each piece of apparatus showing dates of tests and the test result. 15. Continuing to test all hose in the department at least annually at not less than 250 - pounds pressure. Hose records should be maintained on file 17 for each section of hose showing dates of tests and condition of hose. Mr. Fritz Lanham -5- March 7, 1985 16. Continuing efforts to improve, expand and intensify the training program for the entire department. Training should include additional in- service building inspections by the fire department in order that fire fight- ing ,ethods can be preplanned on all major buildings in the city. FIRE SAFETY CONTROL The consistent, systeWatic application of fire safety control regulations combined with a good public education program in fire prevention can be an important factor in reducing the overall incidence of fires and of fire losses. Successful execution of such programs necessitates that a sufficient number of properly trained personnel be provided. The nationally recognized model building and safety codes represent the combined knowledge of many experts in this field and, when adopted with little or no modifications, afford a city the opportunity for reasonable control of hazardous materials and build- ing construction. Consideration should be given to: 17. Maintaining the presently adopted electrical code and building code up -to -date and continuing efforts for good enforcement of the codes throughout the city. 18. Updating the presently adopted 1965 edition of the national fire pre- vention code to the most recent edition and continuing efforts for good enforce- ment of the code throughout the city. The cooperation given Mr. Pietsch during the survey is greatly appreciated. If any discussion of our suggestions is desired, we wish to assure you of our co- -operation. If the city has some contemplated improvements they wish to review with us, we are available to discuss the effect the improvements would have upon the city's classification. We would suggest, however, that such changes also be submitted to the State Board of Insurance for review. Very truly yours, 4Wri ht Robert E. Assistant Chief Engineer REW /j lb Enc. /cc: MIr. Norman Dykes, Director of Public Works :;r. Vance McBride, Fire Chief L7 FIRE PREVENTION AND ENGINEERING BUREAU OF TEXAS 1220 MERCANTILE SECURITIES BUILDING DALLAS. TF.xAS 75201 GOOD PRACTICES FOR DEVELOPING AND MAINTAINING WATER SYSTEMS FOR FIRE PROTECTION OPERATIONS: Operators should know the characteristics of their plant equipment and its capabilities and limitations while operating under emergency conditions such as during high fire and consumption demands; during periods 'when certain equipment is out of service or broken down; or during periods of power failures. The safe oper- ating pressures on a system and the pressures created by the operation of pumps in combinations and simultaneously should be predetermined in order that maximum deliveries can be made safely during emergencies. Use of storage in meeting high consumption demands is considered practical and economical operation in systems of adequate capacities; however, only the minimum storage of water maintained can be considered as contributing to supply for fire protection and caution should be used in drawing down storage in systems inhere it must be relied upon to supplement plant production capacities which are inadequate to provide fire protection supplies. The safe minimum ground and elevated storage required for fire protection, in combina- tion with plant production capacity, should be determined and should be maintained for emergency use. Emergency repair crews should be maintained on duty at all times for large systems and provisions should be made for quickly assembling emer- gency crews where the size of system does not warrant maintaining them on duty. Adequate tools, equipment, piping, fittings, materials and transportation facilities should be maintained for emergency repair work. Plant operators should be main- tained on duty at all times' and provisions should be made for operators and respon- sible employees to receive all alarms of fires. At least one responsible employee with knowledge, of the system and equipped with a distribution system map, valve records and tools for operating valves and hydrants and a valve locator should re- spond to all major fires to assist and advise the fire department in making efficient use of the water supply and distribution system and to render assistance in the event of system failures. CAPACITIES: All features of a crater system should be sufficient in capacity to sup- ply required rates of flows for fire protection for the required duration of time during maximum, daily consumption demands. Consideration must be given to the capacities of all features from the sources of supply to the hydrants. The rates and durations flows required from a system for fire protection is determined by the occupancies k __.i structural conditions Existing in the areas served. The minimum quantities of water maintained in storage and readily available for distribution contributes to the supply available for fire protection; however, if the maximum daily consumption rates ex- ceed the rates of plant production capacity the supply must be considered seriously deficient unless storage is exceptionally large. The distribution system capacities should be sufficient to supply fire demands plus consumption demands to local areas served at residual pressures of, normally, not less than twenty pounds. Norr:�al static pressures should be maintained at a_ proximately 60- pounds. �o -2- RELI_BILITY OF PLANT PRODUCTION: Sufficient purrpi ^.g units and other operating units essential to plant production should be provided to assure that the plant, in con - junction with storage, can supply the required rate of fire *'law for the required Jura- - tion of time during a period of S -days of daily consumption demands when certain units are out of service. Duplication of such units should be sufficient to main- tain supply with any two pumps in any single pu-nping operation or with any single filter or other facility essential to the production of supply out of service. This will generally require, in reserve, the duplication of the two larger capacity pumps in each pumping operation and the duplication of the largest capacity filter and one of each other operating unit essential to the production of adequate supply. RELIABILITY OF POWER SUPPLY: Where electrical power supply is relied upon, the capacity and arrangement should be such that the maximum daily consumption rate and required rate and duration of flow for fire protection can be supplied during a two day duration of a single failure of electrical equipment. General requirements are for two or more independent or alternate sources, transmissions and deliveries of power to the operating units; however, power supply may be maintained through some electrical units during periods of failure by providing means for sectionalizing the units. It is preferable that power circuits be underground. Auxiliary power supply may be provided by the installation of internal combustion engines, engine driven generators or combinations of both. All auxiliary power equipment should be frequently operated and adequately maintained for emergency service. SUPPLY MAINS AND P', ANT PIPING: All pump suction headers, discharge headers, plant piping and supply :rains should be installed and valved so that no single failure will curtail supply essential for meeting the required duration of fire flow during 3- days of maximum daily consumption. Duplicate supply mains and looped pump suction and discharge headers should be provided. Pump suction and discharge headers should be valved so that a single break or the removal of one pump will not result in other pumps being removed from service. ARTERIAL MAINS: Arterial mains and secondary feeders should extend through all build -up areas to supply minor distributors in the local areas. They should be spaced at approximately 3, 000 -foot intervals or less, looped and valved so that no length grew' er than 1/4 -mile will be affected by a single break. No area should be dependent upon a single arterial main for supply. Capacities of arterial mains should be sufficient to deliver required rates of fire flows and consumption demands to all areas served. .NCNOR DISTRIBUTORS: Mains smaller than 6 -inch in size and 6 -inch dead -end mains are not considered satisfactory for supplying hydrants. Existing 4 -inch and smaller mains serving hydrants should be replaced or supplemented with larger mains and hydrants should be transferred to the larger mains. Existing dead -end 6 -inch mains serving hydrants should be looped. A distribution system should be gridironed with minimum size 6 -inch mains at intervals not to exceed 600 -feet. Where intervals be- tween cross - connecting mains must exceed 600 -feet or where dead ends must exist, 8 -inch or larger mains should be installed. Eight -inch and larger mains should be in- stalled in high value areas (business and industrial districts) with mi :• -mum size 8- inch intersecting mains in each street. The size and arrangement of all mains should be adequate to supply required fire flows and consumptions demands in the areas served -3- VALVES: All mains (except arterial mains) should be equipped with gate valves lo- cated so that the maximum length of main that must be removed from service for re- pairs, connections or breaks will not exceed 500 -feet in high value- districts (busine and industrial areas) nor more than 800 -feet elsewhere. Valving should be progress- ively improved in existing systems where the spacing is inadequate. All gate valves should be inspected and serviced annually and repaired as their conditions warrant. Records should be maintained of all valve locations and inspections. Records. of all valve operations should be maintained and frequently reviewed to assure that mains are not unintentionally left out of service. HYDRANTS: Proper hydrant distribution is dependent upon the rates of fire flows required for protection of the areas served and may vary from an average of one hydrant per 160, 000 - square feet of area served in lightly built up residential areas of low fire potential to an average of one hydrant per 40, 000 - square feet of area served in the high -value areas of major cities vrhere large fire potentials exist. The necessary lengths of hose lays should be taken into consideration in selecting hydrant locations. Street intersections are considered preferable locations. Early efforts should be made to provide hydrants at a spacing not to exceed 500 -feet in residential districts of limited fire potential and additional hydrants should be pro- gressively installed. The concentration of hydrants should be increased in high - value, mercantile, industrial and other areas in accordance with the fire potential or required fire flow. Hydrants should con-form with American Water Works Asso- ciation Standards and have at least two 22 -inch outlets and a large pumper connection with National Standard hose threads. Hydrant valve openings should be minimum 5- inch and hydrants should be of a type that the valve will remain closed when the barrel is broken. All connections from mains to hydrants should be of minimum size 6 -inch pipe and all connections should be valved. Valves in hydrant connections to arterial mains are of particular importance. All hydrants should be inspected and serviced semiannually with repairs being made as warranted. Records should be maintained of inspections and repairs to assured a complete maintenance program. PLAN'S AND RECORDS: Plans and records should be provided in duplicate with one copy safely filed. All records should be maintained complete and up -to -date, prop- erly indexed and in convenient and readily accessible order. They should include: plans, capacities, yields and logs of drainage areas, streams, impounding reser- voirs and wells; plans of plants and supply works including intakes, piping, treat- ment facilities, pumping stations and storage reservoirs; a general distribution system map showing sizes and locations of mains; valves, hydrants, pump stations and distribution or elevated storage; large scale sectional maps showing referenced locations and descriptions of all underground installations including mains, service lines, valves, fittings, hydrants and connections; records of pump and treatment plant operations, consumption and pumping rates, pressures and storage levels; and records of system repairs and maintenance including pump tests; hydrant and valve inspections, operations and repairs. Detailed plant layout and distribution system plans and records, suitable for field use, sbould be provided for plant operators and distribution system maintenance crem.,s: Records should be complied and summarized periodically. CITY: BAYTOWN IL RISK: MUNICIPAL HYDRANT FLOW TESTS K SURVEY: 42- 3162 ad a. Z U >-- �W o z u' Q O 1- N w w w Q~ t`- o RESIDUAL HYDRANT FLOW HYDRANT a - - w — J N m a: Q I J O Q N • w Cr a: 0 O w LOCATION u — dN N a a �• °`^ W a LOCATION z z a w 2 N u' I- z J � w o N — r- _ p N '=a a 3 c Joa w 1 12 -5 -84 9:19 am Robin Rd. & Lazy Ln. 72 58 Robin Rd. & Red Bud Ln. 6 4= 6 *1120 2250 3000 2 9:41 am Harvey & Bay Way on West side of street 72 62 Ilarvey & Red Bud Ln. East side of street 8 2!j 31 940 940 4600 2.500 21s 31 1.3 10:07 am Colorado & Wisconsin 62 20 Colorado b Minnesota 6 411 Ps *660 660 2000 4 10:42 am W. Main & Morris 60 54 W. Main & Bayless 8 211 46 1140 3200 3000 5 11:30 am E. Gulf & Hwy 146 62 24 E. Pearce & Hwy. 146 6 44 8'•1 *1320 1400 4000 6 11:29 am Pruett & Sterling 64 54 S. Jones & Sterling 8 44 23 *2170 4800 4000 +7 11:58 am Maplewood & Felton 64 12 Maplewood & Memroial 6 4 *1200 1100 4000 8 1:08 pm Somerset & Fairway 66 28 Tamarach & Fairway 8 44 15 *1750 1950 2500 9 1:27 pm West Side of San Jacinto Mall 62 40 West Side of San Jacinto Mull 12 01 19� *2000 2800 3000 10 1:52 pm West Side of Ross Sterling 1 School. 62 39 West Side of Ross Sterling High School 6 4f 164 *1830 2500 4000 ._.._ -- CITY: BAYTOWdN RISK: Municipal HYDRANT FLOW TESTS SURVEY: 42- 3162 J oQ.Z n W 1- o � d 0 F- cn Q~ F- A RESIDUAL HYDRANT FLOW HYDRANT a • . - J Q a G � g W n: LOCATION u %- vi a �^ -j a o v� n. � LOCATION z-_ 2 N v1 z N O u1 f- n. ° O a (7 11 2:12 pm Bridges & Midway 62 40 Bridges & Long 6 211 21 770 1100 3000 12 2:31 pm Gulfway & Savell 64 12 Savell & Memory Ln. 8 411 2h *810 740 1000 13 •' 3:00 pm Viking & Kipling 58 34 James_Bowie & Kipling 6 411 14h *1730 2200 4000 lei 3:38 pm � Monroe & Danubina 62 52 10th &Ward 6 231 48 1160 2500 3000 +15 4:01 pm On Kilgore 1st hydrant North of flow hydrant 72 40 Kilgore & James 6 2's 4' 360 360 940 3000 2 4'� *Adjusted for v,id in flowing stream +Po)r Tests — p►ssibly closed valves