The URL can be used to link to this page

1985 02 14 CC Minutes50214 -1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN February 14, 1985 The City Council of the City of Baytown, Texas, met in regular session on Thursday, February 14, 1985, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the Baytown City Hall with the following attendance: Fred T. Philips Jimmy Johnson Perry M. Simmons Ron Embry Roy L. Fuller Gerald Dickens Allen Cannon Fritz Lanham Larry Patterson Randy Strong Eileen P. Hall Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Mayor City Manager Assistant City Manager City Attorney City Clerk The meeting was called to order with a quorum present. The invocation was offered by Councilman Dickens, afterwhich the following business was conducted: Consider Minutes for Regular Meeting Held on January 24, 1985 and the Minutes for the Special Meeting Held on January 29, 1985 Councilman Fuller moved for approval of the minutes for the regular meeting held on January 24, 1985 and for the special meeting held on January 29, 1985; Councilman Embry seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Embry, Fuller and Dickens Mayor Cannon Nays: None Receive Petitions There were no petitions presented. Mayor /Council Commend Mr. & Mrs. J. S. Johnson Mayor Cannon and the entire Council expressed appreciation for the cookies and cake provided to Council during the work session by Councilman Johnson's parents. 50214 -2 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - February 14, 1985 Citv Manaaer Report Entex, Inc. - The administration has received a letter from Entex, Inc. regarding the adjustment in cost of fuel which will equal a decrease of about $ .06 per customer for the average user. Texas Department of Water Resources - The administration has received notification from the Texas Department of Water Resources regarding application for a grant to make improve- ments in the wastewater system on the east side that the application has been reviewed, approved and the Step 1 application for the City of Baytown has been transmitted to the Environmental Protection Agency for final concurrence and grant offer execution. In response to an inquiry from Council, Mr. Lanham stated that it was his understanding that for those projects that are already in the system, the federal cuts would not apply. He felt confident that the city will get the East District grant, but for the Central District grant, Baytown will be competing with other worthwhile projects for funds. This project involves both collection system improvements, plant expansion and alterations to the plant to meet new requirements. Federal Emergency Management Agency - The city has received final reimbursement from FEMA for the cleanup after Alicia. The original estimate that was developed immedi- ately after the hurricane was about $983,000; however, that was revised upward to $1,477,000. The city has received a total of $1,105,025 in reimbursement or 74.8% of the revised claim. The maximum that the city could have received would have been 75 %. In the final report to FEMA, certain items were included that were not in the original claim, but those items were rejected. Mr. Lanham stated that he wanted to notify Corpus Christi that their advice helped Baytown a great deal. The day after Alicia came through, they contacted the ad- ministration offering any help that they could render which included a man with some equipment, and they also provided good advice with regard to keeping records for reimbursement purposes. Mr. Lanham acknowledged the fine job performed in the accounting department and gave specific mention to Deborah Briggs for the excellent manner in which she kept records to provide documentation for reimbursement. Mayor Cannon extended commendations to the entire city staff for the excellent manner in which the city recovered from the effects of Hurricane Alicia. Councilman Philips stated that he felt that it would be most appropriate for Mayor Cannon to forward a letter to Mayor Jones of Corpus Christi expressing the city's appreciation for the help and good advice. 50214 -3 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - February 14, 1985 Legislative Seminar - Council members Philips, Embry, Fuller and Dickens and the city manager attended the legisla- tive seminar sponsored by the Texas Municipal League on Monday. This was a breakfast meeting. The legislators were invited to have breakfast with their perspective city officials. Senator Williams and Representative Watson were able to attend the breakfast meeting; the other two representatives were unable to attend. The Governor, Lieutenant Governor and Speaker of the House all were in attendance. Texas Municipal League President, Henry Cisneros and Executive Director Ted Willis, reviewed some of the legislation that they felt would be introduced that would affect cities. The area that received top priority was the state water plan which has passed the House and is now in the Senate. There- fore, the voters will have an opportunity to vote on that in November of 1986. They also talked about billboard legis- lation with emphasis on asking the legislature not to take away the cities' ability to regulate billboards if they elect to do so. The Municipal League is opposing any major changes to the annexation laws. They emphasized that one of the reasons that Texas cities are in better shape financially than cities in other states is because of Texas' annexation laws. The league would discourage the taking away of cities' authority to regulate mobile homes and would want to encourage the continuation of the parks funds acquired from the $ .01 per package sold of cigarettes. Texas Municipal league is supporting the crime package. Councilman Embry mentioned that there was an expert present on federal affairs who gave those in attendance a rundown on pending legislation or changes in either laws or grant programs. All of Washington is struggling with how to have a reasonable budget and reduce the deficit without gutting alot of domestic programs. He expected that many of the domestic programs would be either dramatically curtailed or terminated. Mr. Lanham interjected that revenue sharing has been mentioned as one of those that will be terminated and there will be reductions in community development and wastewater construction grants. 1985 Street Improvement Program - The staff expects to be prepared to present plans and specifications for the 1985 Street Improvement Program at the next regular Council meeting. Water Line Along Interstate 10 - The contractor has installed about 3300 feet of pipe and has completed bores under the feeder roads. The bore under Interstate 10 remains to be done. This project is about 80% complete. Bayway Drive Elevated and Ground Storage - The contractor has completed work on the Bayway Drive elevated and ground storage tanks with the exception of cleanup and final inspection. 50214 -4 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - February 14, 1985 Emergency Power Generator - The emergency power generator for this building has been delivered and placed on the con- crete foundation. The work should be completed and final connections made during the week of February 23. Drainage Ditch North of Baker Road - The county's con- tractor on the drainage ditch north of Baker Road has placed about 3200 feet of concrete lining and about 2500 feet of the slopes have been concreted. Drainage Work by City Forces - Work has been completed along Arbor, Denby, Scarlet and Cedar Bayou. Comments /Questions from Council Councilman Fuller commented that the bright blue color of the water tower on Bayway Drive lends to the esthetics. Councilman Dickens commented that he was pleased to see Barkley Square Apartments being removed. The owner is having this work done; therefore, it was not necessary for the city's contractor to perform the work. The owner met with the Urban Rehabilitation Board last week and indicated to them that he expected to have the work completed and the lot cleared within 60 days. Councilman Simmons inquired if the owner of the property had indicated that he might desire to sell the property to the city. Mr. Lanham responded that the owner had not indicated that, but he did indicate that he planned to landscape the area. Therefore, there could exist the possibility that the city at some point could purchase the property. Councilman Johnson mentioned that he had noticed that the swimming pool is not covered, nor does it have a fence around it. Even though the pool has been emptied, this could pose a threat in the future if left uncovered. Mayor Cannon reported that on Tuesday afternoon, he and Mr. Lanham, Reggie Brewer and Marion Johnson from the Chamber of Commerce had met with Congressman Fields and discussed a possible trip to Washington regarding the homeport project. If this comes about, this will be week after next and at least Mr. Lanham and the Mayor will plan to make this trip if they feel the trip to be justified at that time; Council voiced no objections. Becky Brown Representing People Against Cruelty to Animals Will Appear Ms. Brown stated that there is an impending crisis at the Baytown Animal Shelter. Before the house this session is a bill to raise the standards for animal shelters in the State of Texas. For over a year, People Against Cruelty to 50214 -5 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - February 14, 1985 Animals has been researching animal shelters throughout the state. They have come to the conclusion that the shelter in Baytown is barely adequate to meet the needs of the city. Since 1972, the number of dogs taken in by the shelter has tripled, and the number of cats is up ten (10) times that of the same year. At the same time, there have been no new structures built to house the animals. A portable office was brought in after Alicia and a toilet was added for the personnal. Ms. Brown had photos which she passed out to Council which indicated that the kennels are very crowded. The photos were taken on January 26, 1985. There were 44 dogs housed at that time. By Wednesday, the 30th, there were 86 dogs. In that same week, 22 cats were placed in the cages. From January 21, 1985 to January 31, 1985, people visited the shelter. That breaks down to 18 adopted pets; 28 pets rescued by their owners; 16 brought in animals; and 79 were just looking. The shelter received 390 phone calls -- 270 calls were seeking information and 110 calls were complaints. Ms. Brown said that many people call her concerning complaints and during the last two years many improvements have been made by the staff, but complaints about crowding cannot be addressed without expansion. Cats are kept in the same building in separate cages as the bite or quarantined animals. Only a small chain separates the two which would make it very easy for someone to wonder beyond the cats providing the potential of being bitten by a quarantined animal. Young puppies are kept with small adult dogs. Dogs are sheltered according to sex and size, but puppies, expectant and nursing mothers should have separate, designated areas. There exists a severe reduction in effectiveness in the city's animal control. As stated previously, the dog population has tripled and cats have multiplied ten times. In 1972, the shelter had 3.5 positions of employment. Today, February, 1985, there are 4 positions of employment. An increase of .5 in thirteen years. There are a maximum of two animal control officers patrolling the streets daily and there is a requirement for an ACO to be on the premises every day during working hours. The shelter is open seven days a week from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Each ACO is given two days off, which leaves only three on duty to handle the cleaning, feeding, paper and office work, visiting traffic and patrolling. The shelter is also in need of equipment. At this time the animal shelter has two traps and one of the traps was acquired today. If someone needs a trap, they are placed on a waiting list for four or five weeks, and the rate of increase in cats that may double by the end of the year. The cat population is at epidemic proportions. Baytown per ratio takes in more animals than Pasadena, Deer Park, and Beaumont even though Baytown has fewer employees. This city takes in horses, cows, chickens, and any number of other livestock which includes wildlife. The worst part is that the city has no facilities to house these animals. There is no holding pen for animals that are ill or injured. Ms. Brown pointed to the photos and stated that the trash cans in front of the animal shelter is the method of disposal for animals 50214 -6 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - February 14, 1985 that have been euthanized or found dead on the streets of the city. Every day during the summer the ACO's make daily trips to the shelter. This represents at least $11 each time a run is made and sometimes more than that. It comes to $66 a week in the summer months. The city is spending $3,500 per year on disposal. The costs can be cut considerably through a few simple changes. There is also the fact that the shelter floods. During Alicia, several animals drowned. Even though the city has made arrangements to move the animals should there be another hurricane, there is still the problem of whether there will be a shelter to which the animals can be returned. Ms. Brown invited Council to see the shelter on Saturday. This way Council could witness first hand what Ms: Brown tried to describe. In closing, Ms. Brown suggested a work session with Council. Dr. Robert Pope, Regional Director of Rabies Control for the Texas Board of Health, has also ex- pressed interest in attending the work session. He will be available after March 1. In response to inquiry from Council, Ms. Brown stated that there is a definite need to segregate animals because the owner may wish to claim the animal or someone may wish to adopt the animal. The health of the animal should not be jeopardized. Ms. Brown agreed that the city should be more stringent in the enforcement of the ordinances now in existence and that a new ordinance on regulation of strays would be helpful. For instance, there was an individual in Brownwood who was feeding 30 stray cats and as the days go by that number will increase. A program to have animals sterilized was also suggested. Council felt that rather than have a work session at this point, it would be better for the group to work with Mr. Lanham and his staff to come up with possible solutions to the problems at the animal shelter and come back to Council at some point in the future. Ms. Brown agreed and asked that Mr. Lanham contact her when he is ready to begin. Consider Naming the Outdoor Theater at Bicentennial Park This item will be rescheduled to a future agenda in order to allow time for the Parks & Recreation Board to review the matter. Consider Proposed Ordinance, Authorizing an Inter -Local Agreement with Harris County for Use of Seventeen (17) Acres on Village Lane for Park Purposes and Consider Approving the Development Plans for Park Property on Village Lane Harris County has acquired two parcels of land north of Baker Road, one of them being on Village Lane. That tract contains 17 acres of land, while the other one contains 50214 -7 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - February 14, 1985 about 5 or 6 acres on which a softball field will be constructed for senior citizens. The county would like to lease the 17 acres to the city to be used for park purposes. The city would agree to maintain the park and any improvements that are placed there. The city would agree to have the park remain open for use by the general public and that no fee will be charged for its use. The agreement is for a term of 25 years, but either party may terminate the contract with 6 months notice at any time. The staff is proposing under the next agenda item to develop the 17 acres as soccer fields. Bobby Rountree, Director of Parks and Recreation, in response to a desire from Council to consider both matters explained that presently over 250 youngsters are involved with the soccer program and the only reason that they don't have twice that many is lack of facilities. There is only one small soccer field in the city's parks system and that is at Roseland. The soccer groups play on private fields around the city. Soccer is a sport that youngsters can easily participate in in that they don't have to buy a lot of equipment, nor does the child need to be of particular height or weight to participate. Councilman Embry concurred with Mr. Rountree and pointed out that soccer is one of the sports that provides for aerobic fitness. With regard to cost to play, a representative of the soccer association stated that this fall the cost will be $30, but this spring the cost will be $10. Little League costs $23, but this does not include uniform purchase, nor team photos. If a child cannot afford the cost, the association provides assistance. The property is relatively flat and lends itself well to development of soccer fields. There are few large trees on the property. The plan is to remove alot of the small trees and replant something that will create shade for the players. There will be a 215 car parking lot on the west side on Village Lane and on the property, there will be five soccer fields of various sizes for various ages. Existing funds for the project are $47,000, but that will not do all the work as far as parking and the concession stand. Mr. Rountree has talked to members of the soccer association and they feel that there is a need to get the fields in good shape, have good drainage and have the parking area. The building itself is something that will have to be worked on probably for the next couple years. The group has indicated that they are willing to do so. If there is money left over after getting the layout, drainage work and parking lot done, that money will be applied to materials. The group has members with carpentry, electrical and plumbing skills. The group has some funds that they are willing to expend toward the project. As the soccer program grows, the association's source of revenue will grow and these other improvements can be made. If a concession stand is built, this will be another area in which the association can derive added revenues. At some point, a concession stand, restroom, storage building will be constructed. Bleachers will be placed on each field. 50214 -8 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - February 14, 1985 The Administration recommended that both Items 6 and 7 be approved. Councilman Fuller moved to authorize the Inter -Local Agreement with Harris County for use of seventeen (17) acres on Village Lane for park purposes and to approve the develop- ment plans for park property on Village Lane; Councilman Embry seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Embry, Fuller and Dickens Mayor Cannon Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 4068 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST TO AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH HARRIS COUNTY FOR THE USE OF SEVENTEEN ACRES ON VILLAGE LANE FOR PARK PURPOSES; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Consider the Plan for Drainage Facility and Park This matter was discussed in detail at a recent work session, but Council has not taken formal action on the plan for the drainage facility and park. The facility will be designed to provide water storage on a temporary basis to relieve flooding problems in the vicinity of Ward Road and Highway 146. It is to be used in lieu of a storm sewer during heavy rains, and at other times will serve as a park facility, including two softball diamonds. Money was included in the recent bond sale for this facility and the administration recommended that Council approve the concept. At a later time, the staff will develop detailed plans for Council consideration. Mayor Cannon mentioned that this is a very innovative approach to solving the drainage problem for the area, plus providing a nice park facility, but he wanted the people who voted for the bonds to understand that that money is being allocated toward solving the drainage problems of that area. Councilman Philips concurred and stated further that whether the park functioned as planned or not, the concept for the retention of storm water is a good one. The estimated cost for land purchase, excavation, and construction of necessary storm sewers is $1,035,000 and the cost to build only the storm sewers to correct the drainage would cost almost the same amount. Mayor Cannon pointed out that even if the city expended the money to put in a complete storm sewer system to resolve the drainage situation, this would still leave unresolved the Adams Street ditch problem. 50214 -9 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - February 14, 1985 Councilman Philips moved to approve the concept of a drainage facility and park; Councilman Fuller seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Embry, Fuller and Dickens Mayor Cannon Nays: None Receive Report from McClelland Engineers on Cary's Bayou Bank Slippage Frank Marshall with the firm of McClelland Engineers stated that the company had answered some of the questions in the interim report, but the company was unable to answer some of the questions at that time because at that time the engineers did not know how deep the landslide was. The instruments were in place, but at that time the instruments had not measured enough movement to ascertain the base of the slide. Since that time, there has been enough movement for the engineers to determine the base of the slide and to answer the remaining questions. Mr. Marshall asked that Council turn to Plate 12 and he pointed out the circular arc that is listed as the base of slide. Mr. Marshall stated that the land mass is rotating along the circular arc and in essence the toe of this is coming up below the sheeting that was placed and into the bayou. That's sort of a slow, gradual movement. The engineers felt initially that the problem was in the fill material itself in that it was fill material that was not placed under controlled conditions and was causing the slide. However, he noted that from the dark circular line, one can see that the base of the slide goes well below the fill. It goes through firm to stiff clay. The stiff clay is slackensided which contributes to the landslide. Mr. Marshall added that the engineers are uncertain just how old the slide is. It could have occurred during.the early years of the meandering stream bed and when the bank may have been steeper. It is sliding today and the engineers expect very strongly that the reason that it is sliding today is because of the weight of the fill that has been placed on it. Councilman Philips inquired if the slide stopped and starts intermittently or if it is a continuous gradual movement. Mr. Marshall stated that the engineers had been observing the slide for 8 or 9 months with the instruments, and they know from repeated measurements that the slide didn't move very much at all up until the fall of the year when some wet weather was experienced, along with low tides. 50214 -10 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - February 14, 1985 That tends to trigger these things. At that time it moved in a lateral sense a little less than one inch. Before the instruments were installed, the slide had moved a great deal more than that, but how did it move in those previous times? The engineer suspected that it moved and stopped and moved and stopped. In response to an inquiry from Mayor Cannon, Mr. Marshall explained that the scarp is where this slide surface comes to the surface. It's up near the top of the bank. It's up closest to the houses. The slide is going underneath the existing sheetpiling. There is a vertical line shown on Plate 12 that is labeled existing sheet piling and the line is basically at the bottom. The engineers do not know how deep the piling was driven. Councilman Johnson inquired as to the cause for the sheetpiling to tilt forward toward the bayou. Mr. Marshall responded that its a complicated motion because everything is trying to go one way, but it is being tied back by some anchors that are also in this sliding block. Things are going underneath it or right at the tip so you get some funny kind of motion and you can't really decide what's moving in respect to what. The piling is obviously moving, but you can look behind it and you can see those anchors which have pulled forward too. It is very complicated. Councilman Embry inquired if the land above the point where the scarp is shown is reasonably stable. Mr. Marshall answered that it is reasonable stable. The thing that the engineers don't know fully about how stable it is is as that scarp moves, then obviously the land that's on the back side of that scarp loses its support; therefore, eventually that land will not be stable. The other thing is that there is fill behind the scarp, and not much is known about the fill - -how old is it? How well was it placed? How stable is that fill? This is irrespective of the landslide. Councilman Johnson pointed out that the report had indicated that the house is not in danger of sliding into the bayou, but the slab is cracking and will the house be inhabitable? Previously, Council had received a report that the crack was a surface crack, but now he understands that the crack has deteriorated more and the bathroom tile has started settling and has come loose from the wall or cracked. Other parts of the house have cracked. Mr. Marshall answered that his company had had occasion to look at the crack Mr. Johnson had described. At the time the company observed the crack, it was not a major crack, and there was no evidence of where the crack had expressed itself on the brick veneer on the outside. This would be the kind of crack that you would look for if the front of the house was settling relative to the back of the house. Therefore, the engineers don't know exactly the cause of the crack and whether it has become worse, the engineers haven't looked at it. Minutes of the Regular Meeting - February 14, 1985 Councilman Dickens pointed out house may or may not have a cracked may not be due to the motion behind have to be related, but if they are not imply that the city's broken wa Marshall concurred. 50214 -11 that the fact that the slab and it may or the house, the two don't related, that still does ter main caused it. Mr. Mayor Cannon recognized Mr. Brent Brunson who stated that immediately upon noticing the crack, he notified Norman Dykes, Director of Public Works /City Engineer, and at that time, Mr. Marshall came out. This occurred approximately the second week in December. Mr. Brunson stated that he had contacted Mr. Friermood who is in the slab business in Baytown. He has done slab work on over 4500 houses. He did 200 homes in the vicinity of Mr. Brunson's home, and he is familiar with the slab since he is the one who put the post tensioning in the slab. He has been out several times in the course of the last five years to examine the slab, and he has been out in the last three days. The crack has deteriorated and Mr. Brunson invited Council out to look at the crack. Mr. Brunson requested that Mr. Friermood be allowed to give his professional opinion of what is taking place. Mr. Brunson stated that the crack has opened up. Mr. Friermood has asked that he pull the carpet and linoleum up which Mr. Brunson has not done yet, but the crack is running the length of the slab, not the short way. It seems like surface cracks would run the other way, but Mr. Friermood can describe that. He said that he can't open the door in the bathroom and the tile work is pulling. It is not like the family can't live in the house, but these occurrences concern Mr. Brunson. Mr. D. B. Friermood, at Mr. Brunson's request, stated that he owns Slab Stress in Baytown and that he did the reinforcing in that foundation. When he had observed the slab before, the crack in the slab runs the length of the building which is more or less parallel with the bayou. Being a post tension slab, the concrete is under compression and it is a little unusual in that usually if you have a crack in the slab of that type, it is usually in the trans- verse direction or in the shortest direction of the concrete because it is easier to bend it that way than the other way. However, remember that the foundation of a building sits on top of the ground and it sits there until something causes it to change position. The most usual happening in Baytown is the great difference in water moisture - -the water content of the soil. In the summer, it is extremely dry and the slab wants to follow the ground so it bows in the long direction. When wet weather comes back, it wants to lift up, but if anything happens to the soil underneath it so that it is changing its place, then the house has no choice except to follow it. In this case, if the soil moves away from the foundation towards the bayou, the house has to drop on that side or start to move in the direction of the soil. As far as looking at the crack in the foundation, Mr. Brunson hasn't pulled the carpet up yet or the linoleum floor to see what the extent of the crack is. 50214 -12 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - February 14, 1985 In response to the question whether Mr. Friermood designed the slab, Mr. Friermood said that the engineer that he worked with in Houston, Mr. Goulas, is the engineer of record on the job. It has his name and stamp on the drawing. A soil report that Mr. Aylor had for the subdivision was used. The two houses, the one Mr. Brunson lives in and the one next to it on the east side were what Mr. Friermood called in -fill projects. The houses were already along there and these two lots were empty. The contractor built on those two last. There are grade beams with post tension cable, plus some rebar, but no drilled footings in the foundation. On the house footage, the grade beams are about 24 inches and on the back since the lot slopes down, the original pour there would probably have a beam 30 inches deep. The beams run front to back. He said that he has not run any elevations around the building to determine if there is any measurable difference from perfectly horizonal. Councilman Philips stated that in relation to slab failures in other parts of the city, people have gone in and drilled footings and poured a concrete pad and jacked the house and made the tie to add the drill footings. He inquired if in Mr. Friermood's opinion, would this be a fix for this situation? Mr. Friermood answered that it is possible if one would drill about 60 feet deep and get below all the problems out there. The typical drill footings that are placed under houses in Baytown vary from 6 to 8 or 9 feet depending on the contractor and are very inadequate because one can find cracks in the soil in the summer 10 or 12 or 13 feet deep which is far lower than any founded footing; therefore, if they were not placed deep down below all this soil movement, they wouldn't do any good. Councilman Johnson pointed out that what Mr. Friermood just said goes along with the engineers recommendation for curing the problem. Mr. Friermood stated that the engineers would have to design a footing that was deep enough in the fixed part of the building that would not move that would allow the upper part to push against it. It would be the same procedure used to provide foundation for the large buildings in Houston. Councilman Philips inquired if the engineers had thought of drilled footings solution to the foundation of the house. Mr. Marshall responded that the company did not address the problems with the house. The engineers were looking at the landslide and only at the very end of the assignment were the engineers asked to take a look at the crack. The engineers have not looked at the crack since that time. He said that if the house is settling, in a level survey around the floor slab, then underpining of the house is possible, but how deep would need to be studied. The report's recom- mendations are addressed to stopping the slide. Hopefully, if the slide situation is corrected, then there will be no further problems with the house. If the house has a problem, whether it's related to the slide or whether it's related to the clay problem, whether it's related to the fill that has been placed there, the engineers do not know. 50214 -13 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - February 14, 1985 Councilman Johnson mentioned that if Mr. Brunson's house had been underpinned, he still wouldn't have a back yard. Mr. Marshall concurred -- the backyard is unstable and will remain that way until stabilized. The engineers have suggested three methods to stop the movement of the backyard as follows: 1. Move out to where the existing bulkhead is and make something deeper and stronger; 2. Move back very near the house where the scarp line is and put in a wall that would be not as deep and not as strong which would take some of the backyard load off: You'd actually come to the wall and the wall would drop down maybe five feet and you would have kind of a horizonal backyard. 3. The other is a grouting technique where you actually interject a lime mixture into this slide surface to glue it back together. This is a rather new technique which is not as reliable as the structural fix, but it might represent some economy. The Mayor inquired if there are cost estimates in the report. Mr. Marshall stated that there are no cost estimates in the report, but the report will provide the basis for developing cost estimates. A foundation contractor or grouting contractor with the information in the report could develop cost estimates. Mr. Friermood said that the engineer is absolutely right in that if there is a way to stabilize all that dirt, then you could probably grout under the building and keep it from going along with the dirt. One thing about the situation, being a post tension slab, it will not break off. It will hold together and the first thing you know the whole thing will start to tip. The street side will raise and the bayou side will start to drop. Councilman Philips inquired if it is possible to retension the cables in order to close the slab. Mr. Friermood responded that it would not be possible because when the cables are tensioned to begin with, they are tensioned up to the point recommended by the manufacturer and if you pull them more, they will be ruined. Councilman Dickens moved to accept the report; Council- man Johnson seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Embry, Fuller and Dickens Mayor Cannon Nays: None 50214 -14 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - February 14, 1985 In response to an inquiry from Council, Mr. Lanham stated that after Council has an opportunity to study the report, an item can be placed on a future agenda for what- ever action Council would like to take. Councilman Fuller suggested that Council come to some sort of discussion period in order to decide where the re- sponsibilities are and what the basic problems are and what Council should be looking at before money is expended toward acquiring cost estimates. Councilman Philips pointed out that this is a difficult thing to get cost estimates on. The city would be looking at more engineering work and design work which will cost more money. Councilman Dickens stated that Council will need to reach a point and decide if the city has any cupability and if so, what will the city do about it. Therefore, he had no problem with putting the matter on the next Council agenda. Council requested that Mr. Marshall review the questions and answers briefly for Council. Mr. Marshall reviewed those as follows: 1. Is there fill behind each home? Yes, the borings found up to 17 feet of fill. The engineers do not know how old the fill is, nor when it was placed there. Obviously, there is fill there and the engineers do know that there was fill placed there during some of the reconstruction work. 2. What can be done to hold the slope from slippage? Mr. Marshall stated that that had already been discussed. 3. Why is bank failure worse near Mr. Pitt's yard? The engineers are not certain. It may be that it is on the curve and the soil is being eroded away or it could be that the fill thickness or the fill character is worse. The engineers do not have a definitive answer. 4. What are the subsurface conditions? Develop a soil profile. Mr. Marshall said that that information has already been discussed. 5. What effect does the water table have, if any? How high is water table? The engineers measured water table about 4 feet above the bayou during the period of time that the study was in process. The higher the water table, the more forces there are to cause the bank to move. The lower the water table, generally the more stable things are. 50214 -15 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - February 14, 1985 6. Have improvements upstream contributed to the slope failure? The engineers do not think so, ex increased velocities if it caused the toe of the slope particularly it would have some contribution. of the answer to Question No. 7. the engineer moved on to No. 8. --ept that any any erosion at at the bend, This was part Therefore, 8. Which is likely to have happened first - pipe failure or slope failure? The engineers believe the slope failed first. This opinion is based on surface observations of the length and extent of the scarp and the depth of the slide base revealed by the instrumentation. 9. Is the drainage pipe contributing to or causing the problem of land slippage? The engineers believe that the drainage pipe is contributing very little, if at all to the land slippage. 10. If seepage of water from-the pipe is a factor, how large of an area would be affected? Where would the failure begin, etc? The engineers feel that the seepage from the drain- age pipe is confined.to within close proximity of sewer line. The engineers are not sure where the failure would begin. 11. Would the slope have failed if there had been no pipe? The engineers feel that it could have failed. Council pointed out here that the question uses the word "would" while the answer uses the word "could." Council requested clarification. Mr. Marshall suggested that Council look at Plate 13. He suggested that Council look at where the sewer line was originally and where it was changed to after the failure. He directed Council to the section labeled manhole which is a vertical line and the original storm flow line which came out and emptied into the edge of the bayou. If you look at that line and look at it in respect to the base of the slide and the size of the slide, it is difficult for the engineers to believe that the sewer line had that big an impact on the slide itself. The slide is so much bigger, broader and deeper than the sewer line in its original position. At this point Brent Brunson asked if he could address some questions to Mr. Marshall; Council voiced no objections. 50214 -16 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - February 14, 1985 Mr. Brunson said that he had looked at the diagram and the way that the thing was drawn, but he had thought that Mr. Marshall had told him in a telephone conversation that the depth of the scarp was the depth of the original storm sewer line. Mr. Marshall responded that when Mr. Brunson had made that inquiry that he had responded that it is about 25 feet below the surface. In response to Mr. Brunson's inquiry was that the depth of the original line., the city engineer said that it was not, that you could look at the drawings and see that. 12. Would the slope have failed if there had been no pipe? The engineers feel that the slope could have failed without the presence of the storm sewer. He stated that he would have no problem changing the word "could" to "would." Council indicated to him that this is a crucial point and that they would like a definite answer. Mr. Marshall clarified by stating that the answer to Number 12 is not just "yes." The "yes" must be qualified and in the opinion of the engineers, the slope could, would... in our opinion there is strong reason for us to believe that the slope would have failed without the storm drain ever being installed. Councilman Dickens said then in other words if you're going to say yes, then you would like to have factual data. Councilman Philips said that the wide spread effect of the slide does not appear to be reasonable when you consider the limited impact of a pipe failure. Mr. Marshall responded in the affirmative - both in its horizonal extent and its depth. If you look at the pipe in relationship to those diminsions, it's difficult for us to believe that that was the major cause of the landslide. He said that after the land slipped, perhaps it had something to do with causing it to move later. We can't rule out that there is not some effect of the storm in the continuing movement of the land slide, but it is our opinion that the original cause of the land slide was probably done earlier. It was probably an ancient landslide that began before the subdivision was built. Mr. Brunson said that he had photos and this just happened after the line started to leak. He said that this was the second report with a lot of gray area. Mr. Brunson stated that Mr. Marshall had told him to begin with that he didn't feel like the line should have been placed there to begin with. 50214 -17 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - February 14, 1985 Mr. Marshall said that he didn't remember the conver- sation. Mr. Brunson asked if not taking the original line out, not digging that disturbed soil at a lower depth con- tributed to the problem? Mr. Marshall said that he did not know all the facts about that operation, but he understood that a hole was dug and there was some attempt to put some cement stabilized sand in there which is acceptable procedure. Mr. Brunson continued, without digging out the other disturbed soil? Mr. Marshall responded that you would be dealing with a lot of fill soil there anyway and if you dig out the soil where the pipe was and made some reasonable effort to put back cement stabilized sand, more than likely that would be better than the soil that was there to start with. Councilman Embry said that he realized that Mr. Brunson had a very strong personal involvement and he should have. He also felt that it is natural to try to arrive at solutions tonight, but he felt that Council should have an opportunity to review the report and place an item on the next Council agenda. In response to an inquiry from Council, Mr. Marshall stated that one inch movement is really very little movement. Prior to the instruments being placed, the land had moved several inches. In fact, repairs were made and it moved several more inches. The bulkhead has moved several inches. As far as landslides are concerned, frequently there are several inches of movement before the instruments are destroyed. It is only now that the engineers have been able to make a definite determination as to the slide. Mr. Brunson said that as Council delves into the report, that he would like Council to remember that the line is still there, and the line is separating and leaking. There is going to have to be a just, fair and equitable solution. Councilman Philips said that one of the things that Council should be considering is if the line is taken out and rerouted, would that stop the movement? Would that solve the problem? Recess and Reconvene Mayor Cannon recessed the meeting. After the meeting reconvened, Mayor Cannon announced that during the recess Mr. Brunson had requested that Council delay action on the matter to allow him time to get someone to study the report. The Mayor said that he had spoken to Mr. Marshall and he had no problem with delaying. Mr. Brunson will notify the administration when he is ready to proceed. 50214 -18 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - February 14, 1985 Consider Proposed Ordinance, Approving Industrial District Contract with Mobay Corporation This is the last contract to be renegotiated under the terms of the new policy which is a combination of sales tax and revenue sharing that must equal 35% of what the industry would pay if it would be totally annexed. This year Mobay's payment was on the basis of the 29.4 %, but beginning with this contract, it will be increased to the 35 %. This contract is the same as others that have been negotiated. The admin- istration recommended approval of the contract. Councilman Philips moved to adopt the ordinance; Councilman Fuller seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Embry, Fuller and Dickens Mayor Cannon Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 4069 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST TO AN INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT AGREEMENT WITH MOBAY CHEMICAL CORPORATION; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Consider Proposed Ordinance, Authorizing an Agreement with Harris County Appraisal District to Allow the City to Have a Computer Terminal Linked to the District's Computer Several departments of the city need to have up -to -date information with regard to ownership of property; therefore, there is a need to have the capability to access the current tax records. The cost to the Harris County Appraisal District for the initial hookup is $5,200. Beyond that the administration will need to come back to Council for futher action with regard to the equipment necessary to do the work. At that time, the decision will be made on whether the equipment should be leased or purchased. The estimate is that it will cost about $10,700 yearly to lease the equipment and for the remainder of the year, the cost will be $6,200 for the lease. Councilman Fuller moved to adopt the ordinance; Council- man Philips seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Embry, Fuller and Dickens Mayor Cannon Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 4070 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH HARRIS COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT TO ALLOW THE CITY OF BAYTOWN A COMPUTER TERMINAL LINKED TO THE DISTRICT'S COMPUTER; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. 50214 -19 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - February 14, 1985 Consider Request of Roberta A. Hector for Variance from Buffer Fencing Requirements Ms. Hector is opening a cosmetology shop at 5 Schilling Street and is requesting permission for variance from the buffer fencing requirements. Variances have been granted in the past when abutting property owners have agreed that a fence was not necessary and where the business operator has agreed to erect the fence upon the request of abutting property owners. Therefore, the administration recommended approval subject to the applicants agreement to install a fence if the abutting property owners request it or if the property changes hands. Councilman Johnson moved to grant the variance as recommended by the administration; Councilman Embry seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Embry, Fuller and Dickens Mayor Cannon Nays: None Buffer Fencing on Felton Councilman Philips mentioned that the city has had a request from residents along Felton to have the fence ordinance enforced. Mr. Lanham responded that the staff is still checking to determine if the city can require the owner to erect a fence because it is possible that the business was located there before the city had a buffer fencing requirement, but the business has changed. If the city doesn't have the authority to require that a fence be constructed, then an amendment to the ordinance may be necessary. Consider Authorization for Administration to Seek Proposals to Inventory and Value the Fixed Assets of the City of Baytown Area Water Authority This was discussed during the budget preparation time, and it has been recommended by the auditors for several years. In fact, the auditors have included in their letterG an exception because the city did not have an up -to -date fixed assets inventory. The director of finance has prepared specifications for requests for proposals which he feels will be necessary in order to comply with the auditor's recommen- dation. Besides, this is something that the city needs to have in order to properly reflect the property owned by the city. The administration requested that Council approve the specifications and authorize advertisement for bids. The staff will bring the bids to Council for consideration. Councilman Dickens moved for approval of the specifi- cations and to authorize the staff to advertise for bids; Councilman Johnson seconded the motion. The vote follows: 50214 -20 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - February 14, 1985 Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Embry, Fuller and Dickens Mayor Cannon Nays: None Consider Authorization for Bovay Engineers to Proceed with Construction Plans and Specifications for Elevated Water Tank In early 1982, Council approved employing Bovay Engineers to prepare the plans and specifications for the water tower on the east side of the city. They prepared a preliminary report and on the basis of that report, the city purchased land for the tower, but bonds were not sold until last month to provide funds to perform the work. Now, Council approval is necessary in order for the engineers to proceed. Councilman Philips moved to authorize Bovay Engineers to proceed with construction plans and specifications for elevated water tank on the east side of the city; Councilman Fuller seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Embry, Fuller and Dickens Mayor Cannon Nays: None Consider Plans and Specifications for 1984 -85 Sanitary Sewer Sliplining Phase I Sewer and Authorize Advertisement for Bids The recent bond sale also included money for sliplining, and Council had been provided with a list of several areas of the city where sliplining is necessary at an estimated cost of $135,000. The list is attached to the minutes as Attachment "A." The specifications are prepared, but detailed plans have not been completed. A map in the Council Chamber depicted the areas where sliplining is needed. The administration recommended approval of the list, the plans and authorization to advertise for bids. Mayor Cannon pointed out that the city is spending about $700 a household for sliplining. Councilman Embry moved to approve the list and plans for the 1984 -85 Sanitary Sewer Sliplining Phase I Sewer and authorize advertisement for bids; Councilman Johnson seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Embry, Fuller and Dickens Mayor Cannon Nays: None 50214 -21 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - February 14, 1985 Consider Proposed Sidewalk Construction List Under the 1981 Capital Improvement Program, there was included $300,000 for construction of sidewalks. The Street Subcommittee's primary interest was to have sidewalks con- structed where needed around schools. The staff would like to commence with the first phase of that work and all those included on the list attached to the minutes as Attachment "B," with the exception of the one on Garth Road between Park and Schilling are in the vicinity of schools. Senior citizens have mentioned the need for a sidewalk from Centennial Square down to the shopping area. It will be on the west side of Garth from Schilling down to Park Street. The total cost for all locations is estimated to be $116,160. The administration recommended approval of the proposed sidewalk construction list and advertisement for bids. Councilman Dickens moved to accept the recommendation of the administration; Councilman Fuller seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Embry, Fuller and Dickens Mayor Cannon Nays: None Consider Ballot Distribution for 1985 Municipal Election In a memorandum to Council, the city clerk had explained that Article 6.09(a) of the Election Code provides that the authority responsible for furnishing the ballots in an election shall furnish each election precinct a number of ballots equal to the percentage of voters who voted in that precinct in the most recent corresponding election, plus 25 percent of that number. The official ballots are to be counted before delivery and sealed with the number of each endorsed on the package and entered of record by the clerk in the minutes of City Council. Attached to the minutes as Attachment "C" is the proposed packaging of ballot cards for the April 6 Municipal Election. Councilman Embry moved to approve the list; Councilman Johnson seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Embry, Fuller and Dickens Mayor Cannon Nays: None Consider Proposed Ordinance, Repealing Ordinance No. 4061 Authorizing Demolition of Buildings at 115- 117 -119 West Texas Avenue Dr Patrick L. Mahan requested to address Council on this item. Before he addressed the item, he commented on the event sponsored by the Downtown Action Committee on the 50214 -22 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - February 14, 1985 lighting of the Oak Tree, and mentioned the cooperation and assistance provided by Bobby Rountree, Bill Cornelius and Jim Sanders from the city, Lisa Ocker from the Baytown Sun and the Chamber of Commerce staff. Also, Jack Whitley donated all the electrical hookups. Mr. Mahan supported the repeal of Ordinance No. 4061 which authorizes the demolition of buildings at 115- 117 -119 West Texas Avenue. He stated that the loss of these buildings would be a setback to the goals of the Downtown Action Committee, the city, the Chamber and Lee College. That is, it would be a setback to the goals to bring the downtown Goose Creek area back to life. He stressed that he was not asking for this just on behalf of Mr. Calcarone, but for the good of all of the property owners, business owners and ultimately the citizens of Baytown. If those two buildings are demolished, they are not likely to be replaced for years and years, if ever. These buildings have stood the test of time for over 60 years. They have weathered numerous storms, including Carla and Alicia. A few weeks or even months more will not make that much difference. The buildings are closed up and people cannot get into the buildings. In conjunction with the requested extension, the Downtown Action Committee requested a meeting with the city manager and his staff so that something can be worked out to save the building. The Downtown Action Committee volunteered to act as a go- between so that this can be worked out to the greater good of Baytown. The committee disapproves of the improvements that Mr. Calcarone put into the property after the building permits were cancelled and the committee supports Section 107 -2(a) and (b) of the city building code that specifies the penalty for this action. The committee requested Council cooperation in this matter, and Mr. Mahan mentioned that the success of the revitalization of downtown Goose Creek is dependent on the collective efforts of the individual owners as well as the City, Chamber and Lee College. Most of the present owners of property in the downtown Goose Creek area who are actively working to upgrade their buildings are doing so after working at a full time job elsewhere. Mr. Mahan ended his presentation with a request for an extension of 30 to 90 days in order to allow time to work out a way to keep those two parts of downtown Goose Creek history standing. Mayor Cannon explained that everybody at the Council table is interested in preserving downtown if possible. He also inquired if Mr. Mahan was asking to delay action on this or had Mr. Calcarone given Mr. Mahan some reason to think that he plans to work this problem out. Council has delayed this several times. hil 50214 -23 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - February 14, 1985 Mr. Mahan stated that he had spoken with Mr. Calcarone and he believes that he will be cooperative. As far as the specifics, this is the reason that Mr. Mahan would like to have a meeting with Mr. Lanham and his staff. Mayor Cannon stated that he would have no problem with Mr. Lanahm and his staff meeting with the group, but if it is to be done, it is to be done right and if there are some equitable solutions, that is fine. However, he emphasized that he did not want the administration to be placed in a compromised position. Mr. Lanham stated that he felt that Mr. Mahan and his group are asking-to'-be allowed a period of time to attempt to work out a solution. He said that he had no problem with working with the group, but felt that there should be a 30 -day limit. Council felt that 30 days should not make that much difference and decided that the matter should be brought back to Council at the first meeting in March. Councilman Philips moved to delay action on the ordin- ance until the first Council meeting in March; Councilman Embry seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Embry, and Dickens Mayor Cannon Nays: None Abstained: Councilman Fuller Consider Proposed Ordinance, Awarding Bid for Hydraulic Knuckleboom Loader The administration recommended that Council reject the bids and authorize the staff to rewrite the specifications and rebid. The specifications were originally written around a machine that had been used in the past which did not allow for a cylindrical turret, but there is such a machine that is used to a great extent in the lumber producing areas. This equipment is used to load brush. Councilman Philips moved to reject the bids and authorize the staff to rewrite the specifications and rebid; Councilman Johnson seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Embry, Fuller and Dickens Mayor Cannon Nays: None 50214 -24 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - February 14, 1985 Consent Agenda Council considered the consent agenda as follows: a. Proposed Ordinance No. 50214 -6, will award the contract for re- roofing of the Community Building. Three bids were received. Triple G Roofing submitted the low bid of $56,465. We recommend the low bidder, Triple G Roofing, be awarded this contract. b. Proposed Ordinance No. 50214 -7, will award the bid for two - one ton crew cab trucks. Bids were mailed to 9 vendors and two proposals were received. Knapp Chevrolet submitted the low bid of $30,578. We recommend the low bidder, Knapp Chevrolet, be awarded this contract. c. Proposed Ordinance No. 50214 -8, will award the annual liquid chlorine contract. Bids were mailed to 6 vendors and three proposals were received. on item #1 we did not indicate the size of the container we were seeking. This led to confusion on the part of one vendor, Dixie Chemical Co. Therefore, we would request a rebid of this item. Jones Chemical had submitted the low bid on item #1 in the amount of $42,735. Dixie Chemical sumbitted the low bid on item #2 in the amount of $3,825. We recommend the bid on item #1 be rejected and that item be rebid and that the low bidder on item #21 Dixie Chemical, be awarded this contract. d. Proposed Ordinance No. 50214 -9, will award the bid for one - one ton cab and chassis. Bids were mailed to nine vendors and 3 proposals were received. Bayshore Dodge - Toyota submitted the low bid of $11,191.14. We recommend the low bidder, Bayshore Dodge - Toyota, be awarded this contract. e. Proposed Ordinance No. 50214 -10, will award the annual gasoline and diesel fuel contract. Bids were mailed to six vendors and two proposals were received. The low bidder who meets specifications is Hometown Oil Company, Inc. with a bid amount of $239,243. We recommend the low bidder, Hometown Oil Company, be awarded this contract. 50214 -25 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - February 14, 1985 f. Proposed Ordinance No. 50214 -11, will award the bid for an eight passenger carrier vehicle. Bids were mailed to six vendors and three proposals were received. Bob Robertson Chevrolet submitted the low bid of $11,616.95. We recommend the low bidder, Bob Robertson Chev- rolet, be awarded this contract. g. Proposed Ordinance No. 50214 -12, will award the annual concrete pipe contract. Bids were mailed to six vendors and three proposals were received. Gifford -Hill Pipe Company submitted the low bid of $86,515. We recommend the low bidder, Gifford -Hill Pipe Company, be awarded this contract. h. Proposed Ordinance No. 50214 -13, will authorize the abandonment of a portion of Graham Street between Morris and Bayless Drive. This is a small strip of land between Morris and Bayless Streets that is approximately 40 feet by 150 feet. At present there are three abutting property owners all of which have agreed to purchase that part of the street which abuts their property. This abandonment is upon request of Mrs. Dorcus Jackson. The utility companies have all been contacted and indicate that they have no objections with this abandonment. We recommend approval of Proposed Ordinance No. 50214 -13. i. Proposed Ordinance No. 50214 -14, will award the bid for the sale of abandoned vehicles. Bids were mailed to 13 vendors and five proposals were received. Lister's Salvage submitted the low bid of $4,200. We recommend the low bidder, Lister's Salvage, be awarded this contract. j. Proposed Ordinance No. 50214 -15, will authorize purchase of additional pickup truck through existing H -GAC Interlocal Agreement. This is to replace a wrecked vehicle in the Planning and Traffic Department. The vehicle was totaled in the accident. The insurance company has offered a $3,400 settlement. The estimated cost of purchasing a new pickup is $8,600. The difference will be transferred from other accounts in the Planning and Traffic budget. We recommend approval of Proposed Ordinance No. 50214 -15. 50214 -26 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - February 14, 1985 Councilman Dickens moved to approve the consent agenda Items a through j; Councilman Embry seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Embry, Fuller and Dickens Mayor Cannon Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 4071 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AND ATTEST TO A CONTRACT WITH TRIPLE G ROOFING FOR THE REROOFING OF THE COMMUNITY BUILDING; MAKING OTHER PROVISIONS RELATED THERETO; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. (Proposed Ordinance No. 50214 -6) ORDINANCE NO. 4072 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF KNAPP CHEVROLET FOR THE PURCHASE OF TWO ONE TON CREW CABS AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF THIRTY THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED SEVENTY -EIGHT AND N01100 ($30,578.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 50214 -7) ORDINANCE NO. 4073 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF DIXIE CHEMICAL COMPANY FOR ITEM NO. 2 OF THE ANNUAL LIQUID CHLORINE CONTRACT AND AUTHOR- IZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF THREE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED TWENTY -FIVE AND N01100 ($3,825.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 50214 -8) ORDINANCE NO. 4074 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF BAYSHORE DODGE- TOYOTA, INC. FOR THE PURCHASE OF A ONE TON CAB AND CHASSIS AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF ELEVEN THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED NINETY -ONE AND 14/100 ($11,191.14) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 50214 -9) ORDINANCE NO. 4075 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF HOMETOWN OIL COMPANY; INC. FOR THE ANNUAL GASOLINE AND DIESEL FUEL CONTRACT AND AUTHOR- IZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF TWO HUNDRED THIRTY -NINE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED FORTY -THREE AND N01100 ($239,243.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 50214 -10) 50214 -27 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - February 14, 1985 ORDINANCE NO. 4076 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF BOB ROBERTSON CHEVROLET COMPANY FOR AN EIGHT PASSENGER CARRIER VEHICLE AND AUTHOR- IZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF ELEVEN THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED SIXTEEN AND 951100 ($11,616.95) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 50214 -11) ORDINANCE NO. 4077 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF GIFFORD -HILL PIPE COMPANY FOR THE ANNUAL CONCRETE PIPE CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF EIGHTY -SIX THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED FIFTEEN AND N01100 ($86,515.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 50214 -12) ORDINANCE NO. 4078 AN ORDINANCE DISCONTINUING, ABANDONING FOR PUBLIC USE, AND CLOSING A PORTION OF GRAHAM STREET ADJACENT TO AND BETWEEN LOTS 5, 6 AND 7 IN BLOCK NO. 23 AND LOTS NO. 1 AND 2 IN BLOCK 27 OF MIDDLETOWN SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 6 PAGE 7 OF THE MAP RECORDS OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS; ABANDONING AND QUITCLAIMING ALL INTEREST OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN AND THE PUBLIC IN AND TO SAID PORTION OF SAID STREET; AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST AND DELIVER A CONVEYANCE TO THE ABUTTING OWNERS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 40514 -13) ORDINANCE NO. 4079 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF ABANDONED VEHICLES HELD BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN FOR THE SALE PRICE OF FOUR THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED AND N01100 ($4,200.00) DOLLARS; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. (Proposed Ordinance No. 50214 -14) ORDINANCE NO. 4080 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE INTERLOCAL PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH THE HOUSTON - GALVESTON AREA COUNCIL FOR THE PURCHASE OF VEHICLES TO ADD ONE PICKUP TRUCK TO SAID AGREEMENT; AUTHORIZING PAYMENT OF THE SUM OF EIGHT THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED SEVENTY -SIX AND 81/100 ($8,576.81) DOLLARS; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF. (Proposed Ordinance No. 50214 -15) For bid tabulations, see Attachments "D" through "K." Consider Appointments to Mobile Home Review Board These appointments will be made at a later date. 50214 -28 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - February 14, 1985 Consider Confirmation of Appointments to Library Board The city manager requested confirmation of the appointments of Graham Painter, Blanche Duplantis and Billy Dornburg and the reappointment of Betty Hartman to the Baytown Library Advisory Board. Councilman Philips moved to confirm the city manager's appointments to the Baytown Library Advisory Board; Councilman Johnson seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johson, Simmons, Embry, Fuller and Dickens Mayor Cannon Nays: None Mayor Appoints Audit Committee Mayor Cannon appointed Council members Johnson, Fuller and Philips to serve as members of the audit committee. Councilman Johnson was named Chairman. The audit committee is to name an auditor prior to March 1. Recess into Executive Session to Discuss Pending and Contemplated Litigation and Real Estate Acquisition Mayor Cannon recessed the open meeting into executive session to discuss pending and contemplated litigation and real estate acquisition. When the open meeting reconvened, the following business was transacted: Consider Proposed Ordinance, Authorizing the City Attorney to Make Offers for and on Behalf of the City of Baytown for Purchase of Property to Use for Drainage Improvements and as a Park Councilman Philips moved to adopt the ordinance authorizing the city attorney to offer for and on behalf of the City of Baytown $449,055.90 to Ms. Edna M. Gray for the purchase of an 11.399 acre tract out of the William Scott Lower League, A -65, Harris County, Texas, fronting on Tenth Street at Ward Road and a .055 acre underground drainage easement across adjoining property. Councilman Johnson seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Embry, Fuller and Dickens Mayor Cannon Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 4081 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO MAKE OFFERS FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN TO THE OWNERS OR OTHER PARTIES IN INTEREST FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN TRACTS DESCRIBED HEREIN REQUIRED FOR PARK AND DRAINAGE PURPOSES; REQUIRING THAT SUCH OFFERS BE ACCEPTED WITHIN FIFTEEN (15) DAYS; DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO INSTITUTE CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS IN THE EVENT SUCH OFFERS ARE REFUSED; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. 50214 -29 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - February 14, 1985 Consider Proposed Ordinance, Authorizing the City Attorney to Make Offers for and on Behalf of the City of Baytown for Purchase of Property in Brownwood; Requiring that Such Offers be Accepted within Fifteen (15) Days; Directing the City Attorney to Institute Condemnation Proceedings in The Event Such Offers Are Refused The proposed ordinance authorizes the city attorney to make offers for and on behalf of the City of Baytown to purchase thirty -one (31) parcels of property in Brownwood. Councilman Dickens moved to adopt the ordinance; Councilman Johnson seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Embry, Fuller and Dickens Mayor Cannon voted "Aye" on all the parcels with the exception of Item No. 20. On that item he abstained. Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 4082 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO MAKE OFFERS FOR AN ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN TO THE OWNERS OR OTHER PARTIES IN INTEREST FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN TRACTS DESCRIBED HEREIN REQUIRED FOR PARK PURPOSES; REQUIRING THAT SUCH OFFERS BE ACCEPTED WITHIN FIFTEEN (15) DAYS; DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO INSTITUTE CONDEMENATION PRO- CEEDINGS IN THE EVENT SUCH OFFERS ARE REFUSED; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Adjourn There being no further business to be transacted, the meeting was adjourned. Eileen P. Hall, City Clerk M E M O R A N D U M Attachment "A" February 5, 1985 TO: ^� Fritz Lanham, City *tanager TROM.:�PNorman Dykes, City Engineer /Director of Public Works SUBJ: 1984 -85 Sanitary Sewer Sliplining - Phase I Job No. 8502 -05 Authorization to advertise for bids to rehabilitate the following sanitary sewer lines by sliplining is requested: 1,800 L.F. - Existing 8" sanitary sewer on Cedar Bayou Road from manhole (MH) at S.H. 146 west to end of line 1,060 L.F. - Existing 8" sanitary sewer between Utah & Maryland from rM F220 at W. Main southwest to MH F221 1,415 L.F. - Existing 8" sanitary sewer between Lloyd Drive & Grantham Road from MH B117 west to HH B105 210 L.F. - Existing 6" sanitary sewer between Lloyd Drive & Grantham Road from MH B105 west to end of line 1,410 L.F. - Existing 8" sanitary sewer from rIIi C170 at inter= section of Harvard & Park south to MH C221 (755 L.F.), then east to MH C219 (655 L.F.) 680 L.F. - Existing 6" sanitary sewer between W. Lobit & W. Jack from MH D197A at N. Commerce west to 14H D197 at N. Gaillard 342 L.F. - Existing 6" sanitary sewer from clean -out near in- tersection of 'Kingsway & Tompkins west to MR along north side of Tompkins 730 L.F. - Existing 8" sanitary sewer from MH G253A at inter- section of S. Main & W. Main north three line seg- ments to MH G308 An estimated total of 196 residential service connections will be required to complete the work covered by this sliplining contract. This rehabilitation project has been identified by frequent citizen complaints resulting from sewer problems or street cave -ins requiring emergency repairs by Public Works repair crews. One line has been 1984 -85 Sanitary Sewer Sliplining - Phase I Job 'No. 8502 -05 February 5, .19 85 inspected using the television device for observation. Serious failure of the upper portion of the concrete was found for a considerable length, . indicating a need for sliplining. It is estimated that the cost of this work is $135,000. Funds are provided in the recent bond sale from the 1981 Capital Improvement Program. Copy to: Asst'City Mgr '--- City Clerk - Legal RS /lc 1) M E M O R A N D U M February 11, 1985 Attachment "B" TO: Fritz Lanham, City Manager FROXIAorman Dykes, City Engineer /Director of Public Works SUBJ: Proposed Sidewalk List - Update Under the 1981 Capital Improvement Program, the Street Subcommittee recommended monies be spent for sidewalks near schools. The Engineering Department has prepared the following list:. Location From To Market Street R.E. Lee High School Civic Circle Lee Drive Fairway Drive Riggs Decker Drive Baker Road Coachman Drive Quail Hollow Drive. Garth Road Park Street Schilling Total.cost for all locations is estimated to be $116,160. W. Main Arrowhead Drive Copy to: Asst City Mgr City Clerk Legal ES /lc BALLOT DISTRIBUTION FOR APRIL 6, 1984 ELECTION PRECINCT NO. SERIAL NUMBERS Absentee 001 - 450 12 451 - 775 13 776 - 1100 28 1101 - 1800 99 1801 - 2175 100 2176 - 2575 101 2576 - 2900 102 2901 - 3275 149 3276 - 3675 165 3676 - 4375 248 4376 - 4700 249 4701— 5075 386 5076 - 5450 414 5451 - 5825 456 5826 - 6225 532 6226 - 6625 533 6626 - 7000 Attachment "C" TOTAL: 450 325 325 700 375 400 325 375 400 700 325 375 375 375 400 400 375 N CJTY. 0: �YTO::N Attachment "I)" • 9l D TA 3U! �T 1 Cb'J Ti;LE: REROOFING OF COMMUNITY QUILDING e1�: X8501 -33 D.�TE: 1 -18 -85 2 : GO P.M. - _ :' - :.' ••.A +IT ='•� I QTY UNIT' DESCRIPTION FOUR SEASONS• BRINKMAIVN ROOFING TRIPLE �G ROOFING I UId1T PRIG -� _ - - EXT. PR]Cc UNIT PRICE I EXT. PRICc ( UtJIT PR1C� I EXT. PR1C= IUr•.IT PRIC= (EXT. PRIG. I each REROOFING OF COMMUNITY E3UILDING $96,617.00 $57,948.00 I ($56,465.00 I i I er s ecifications. I I I - 1I I I I I I I . I I DELIVERY: � 45 Days I 160 Days I 45 Days I I � I I I I I I I I I I I I ( UNSOLICITED ALTERNATE: I � 1$66,400.00 I I I I I I I I •. I I I I ( I r l I I I I I I I I I I I - I I I I i I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I ( I I ( I I I I I I I I I _ I I I I I I - I I I� I I I i l I I ( I• i I I '_ ! I I ' ( I I I I I I - - - -- - - -- ' I I � � f I - I I - � -- CITY Or P..aYTO:•.'N BID TABULAT I O�V ;;, ONE TON CREW CAD l�t�501 -31 ;iE: 2 -6 -85 2:00 P.M. Attacl....nt "E" TF "�I QTY UNIT I DESCRIPTION • I3AYSHORE•DODGE�TOYOTA [30[3 ROBERTSON CHEVROLET JAY MARKS CHEVROLET iKNAPP CHEVROLET - Vi�IT PRICE EXT. PRICE UNIT PRICE EXT. PRICc (• UNIT P21Cc EXT. PRICE UNIT PRICcIEXT. PRICE 1 � 2 each ONE TON CREW CAE3, per NO B D $15,639.18 $31,278.36 NO RESP NSE 15 289.0 3 specifications: � ' I I MAKE /MODEL: � 1985 Chev, C 30943 � 1985 Chev CC 309 DELIVERY: � 120 Days � 120 Da s SPECIAL CONDITION: Does not upply the —� requested product. (� _ �� __�_ - - -- - -� � � __ I aids mailed to nin¢ vendors. j I ,. I I I � ! I ! I i � ; ... - - - - -- i :.7 i:�ir,L '— I ' I 1 I � I I III lil i'I i C.1 1 •1 r i J 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 i �1' 1 C1 1 O 0 -v 3 J 1 W �v t'1 . O Z n m a a c, m N to n v -+ D o w -n -4 Q Q .. t 1 N A C+ n � C Z v► a o z m in Ln n J. JJ • � � off. ., � rvrt r- 2.q o N m Z n P-4 G m 11.1 . •• C) a f ;o � C) co n o z ••' m r rn -s O r-i . o' z IC . �a �v z � rnZ 0 .xm rn b v ' _ n rn n rn rn x ni jo i0 • n RI _. --1 IC n nl rn x n rn �1' 1 C1 1 O 0 -v 3 J 1 W �v t'1 . O Z n m a a c, m N to n v -+ D o w -n -4 Q Q • - ONE 70N CREW CAt3 11f3501 -37 -�E. 2 -(i -MI5 2:00 P.M. CITY Or. PJ►7TO:.T] ' BID TABULATION � PAGE 3 • i T`'''� I QTY UNIT DESCRIPTICiN �• CHARLIE THOMAS• CHRYSLER UN]T PRICE EXT. PRICE UNIT PRICE EXT. PRICc � I• UNIT P210E EXT. PR]Cc I — UNIT PR)CcIEXT. PRICE 1 I 2 each ONE TON CREW CA[3, per X10 BI ( specifications.'' � I I I I I I MAKE /MODEL: I DELIVERY:-- I I I I SPECIAL CONDITION: . Time fram too short I I I - I I to supply the unit. I I I I I I ,I I I I I � I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I � I � I ' I- i I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I 'I I I I I I __ -I I I I I I I I !_ I I I I I I ( I .- -, � I I i I , E � • _. _ 4_ _ l: =i Tui�L I i I ( i I ( I �p�.t_ ` I � � i � TiiL =: ANNUAL LIQUID CHLORINE CONTRACT ei�: N8512 -31 �,�TF; 1 -16 -85 2:G0 P.M. CITY 0: P.aYTOi•:N SID TA6UL;T I OiJ Attachment "F" ' �IT ��I QTY Ulv1T I DESCRIPTION AMERIGAS DIXIE CHEMICAL JONEX CHEMICALS, INC. ; NORAIN SUPPLY UhIT PRICE' EXT. PRICi: UNIT PRICc EXT. PR10E 1 UNIT PRIC= EXT. PR1Cc Ill1tiIT PR1Cc` IEXT. PRICE _ IANNUAL LIQUID CHLORINE CONTRACT, NO RESP NSE NO RES ONSE per specifications. � I • � I I I I • _� I1 150 tank I1 Ton Tanks for Public Works �* 38.25 � *$5,735.50 � 284.90 $42,735.00 I I I � I �2 1 100 cycl (150 lbs. �c�rcls for Parks &•Rec. I 38.25 ( $3,325.00 1 45.00 $ 4,500.00 I I I I I � � � ( I •, TOTAL: I I $9,560.50 I ( $47,235.00 � I I I � ,I 2 Days � 11 -3 Days I I I I SPECIAL CONDITION5: I *The one tonldesignation I I � � I ( � was e o e nvi a lon � � � � � the vendor apparently � I I I ( I ioug we ere � ing I I ( I � I ( � � ( both departr�ents. ( I I I I � � � I I � � � f � � � I I I �I �___� � � - � I � � i I -- _ _� � I � � i ; � ! �" ", TOT.4! � • ( � ..- � � I � I T;;��; ANNUAL LIQUID CHLORINE CONTRACT E. I �: X8512 -31 c.�T;. • 1 -16 -85 2 0 0 P .M. CITY C: E'.,aYTO::N 31 D Tk3Ul1,T I Oil :; .' �_ PAGE 2 IIT = "II THOMPSON HAYWARD CHEMIC VAN WATERS & ROGERS � � � • QTY utvIT DESCRIPTION _; - ( UWIT PRIC= I EXT. PRICLIUr.IT P2JCE IEXT. PRIC= UtdIT PRIC. EXT. FRICt UNIT�PRICc _ I EXT. PRIG I AIINUAL LIQUID CHLORINE CONTRACT, NO BID ( � � per specifications. I ( I � • I I I I I I I � I< 150 tank � 1 Ton tanks for Public Works. 326.00 $48,900.00 I •' � I I I :. I I I � 1 100 cycl 1 150 lbs Cyclinders for Parks u Re NO BID I I I ( I I I I I I I I I I �: 1 I I I `. T.O�L • I � I I I I .� I �. � � ( I DELIVERY: AS REQUEST�D ( I ( ( � � I I � I I I I � I �: � � I I ( i I I I � � I I I I I I I � I .' I I I I I I I I I I :. I I I � I I I I I �� - i I I I I - I I I '_.__I I I I I I f I i I `� __ - -- � � � � � � I I � I � ,, I � � i .. . _�- _ -� � t � -- _' . --__ ._ _ - -- ---- ' - .� P:. i TOT.,! � I � � � ( � � � 5 - --• •- � i � 1 � 4 1.1 1 Y Or E.'1Y r U`.•.7J ' BID TABULATION . :. � � : or�r TON CA13 AND CHASS] S (r��i(11 -3$ Attachment "G" �TF "�I QTY UNIT � DESCRIPTICiN � �� BAYSHORE DODGE - TOYOTA. QOQ R0I3ERTSON CHEVROLET JAY MARKS CHEVROLET ; KNAPP CHEVROLET Ur�tiT PRICc EXT. PRICE UNiT PRICE EXT. PR]Cc � UNIT PRICc EXT, PRICE UNIT PZ)CcIEXT. PRICE l 1 I 1 each ONE TON CAQ AND CHASSIS, er � $1T,191.1� $13,001.96 NO RESPON E b11,199.00 s ecifications. � ' MAKE /MODEL: 1985 Dod e, D -350 1985 Chev, C 31003 1985 Chev, C 31003 ' DELIVERY: 60- 90�Days. � 90 Days � � 90 -120 Days ' .. ..... I �_ _�__ _+__� ____�� - - -i �� ( � � � � I .. - -� - - -- � � � . _ ..�. I t •, ! ! i i � e i I i , � I aids mailed to nine vendors � � ? `, i I f I I ro -i 1 (i I J' r � e I ; i I � 1 jII � IiI I I i I ! 4 • ro N 1 C1 1 t:n a O CTS O t w co in O Z m -I O z n a A Z ° n x A N N N I - I � O a S Z —I 2 O m Ir - C) Z "p a p p Z K a z x a N N' rr N V V m r Z N • Z � a ° n ;o nt z — m o m o N n m . �z o z 'o m O M c m o m N � z rn �-• N )t; 2 rn —i cn ~ nt C tr a Z N O 1 O m n o nt 0 m X�t —1 N • r rn ;a ._ nl im wo : i c ton z O ton C-1. o O p ;u O nl Ln a rn C-) -a r n rn • ro N 1 C1 1 t:n a O CTS O t w co in O Z m -I O z n a A Z ° n x A N N N 1. l 1 Y Uf X 1 7 U: i`N • BID 7ABULATICAV � � • ONE TON CAO AND CIIASS I S !!f�`��I -3f3 ATE: 2 -6 -a5 2:G0 P.M. PAQE 3 ��I TF•� Q TY UNIT � DESCRIPTION • :CHARLIE THOMAS CHRYSLE UNIT PR1Cc EXT. PRICE UNIT PRICE EXT. PRICc I• UNIT P21Cc EXT. PR1Ct UNIT PR1CcIEXT. PRICE 1 � 1 each -ONE TON CAB AND CHASSIS, per _ NO B. D ___. • specifications: - - -- - j , - ---° -• - - ----- � -- - --- - -- - � - - -- j -- - -• ._ ff SPECIAL CONDITION: Time'fram ,too short • �• ' � •• for the m. nufacturer to supply unit. I I t =�:: __ —;) I �� I � � ( �� _ �_� _ (_ _ _� __.._.___ i i f � � I � , ' ___. - - -- - j , - ---° -• - - ----- � -- - --- - -- - � - - -- j -- - -• ._ ff - - ---- - -- � - --- ;--- - --- --• - �- •- • ---• -- - -•-•-- I I t =�:: TITLE: ANNUAL GASOLINE AND DIES FUEL CONTRACT EID: #8512 -26 D.�TE: 1 -16 -85 2 : GO P.M. CITY dF EAYTO�•.7V • Attactw� .ent "H" , B1O TABULAT1O�y ITF�; QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION EXXON COMPANY U.S.A. � HOMETOWN OIL COMPANY INC MAJOR BRAND .OILS �; O'ROURKE DIST CO. Ur�'17 PRIG EXT. PRICE UNIT PRICE I EXT. PRICB I UrJIT P2ICc EXT. PRICE IUNIT PR1Cc IEXT. PRICc ANNUAL GASOLI & D NO BID NO RESPON E CONTRACT er s ecifications._ 1 100,J0 als �Re ular Leaded Gasoline � '' � + 50,00 als Re ular Unleaded Gasoline 'r �� + 100 00 als Premium Unleaded Gasoline ( 0 � � +• SUB TOTAL: � ( 184 2 � 15,0 als (Re ular Unleaded Gasoline � +.025 al � 11 382 + for Parks & Recreation 3 � 55,0 0 als Diesel #2 � +.025 al � 43 461.00 ( +.055 al 45 111.00 TOTAL: $239,243.00 � � 243 083.50 DELIVERY: � SAME DAY � i i i i � � ' � � :_ � � � � ( I � I I � ! � � � � � � � i �� i ? + i ; . � � __ Eids mailed to 4 vendors. � � � `• ' _ -- - + r• < =1 TJT1 =.� I I � ( � I � 1 ` � I ( CITY Or LAYTUWN • Attachment "I" - • BID TABULAT I OrJ TITLE: EIGHT PASSENGER CARRIER VEHICLE HID' #8501 -36 OAT E: 1 -r1 -85 2:00 P.M. +IT G'•t QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION BAYSHORE DODGE - TOYOTA BAYTOWN MOTORS BOB ROBERTSON CHEVROLET ;JAY MARKS CHEVROLE I T _ UNIT PRICE EXT. PRICE UNIT PRICE EXT. PRICE I U14IT PRICE EXT. PRICE UnIIT PRICc IEXT. PRICE I 1 1 each EIGHT PASSENGER CARRIER VEHICLE, NO RESP NSE $12,275.78 $11,G16.95 NO RESPON E per-specifications. I MAKE 1985 GMC 1985 Chev I MODEL I Suburban Suburban I ( DELIVERY 90 Days 90 Days I I i I I I Bids were mailed to six vendors I I I I r TOTAL .'DMC ( I I I I CITY OF BAYTO:�r ' • � PAGE 2 ' BID TABULATIC�Y •11iLF; EIGFIT PASSENGER CARRIER VEHICLE [, I �: N8501 -36 �.�7E: 1 -31 -85 2 : GO P.M. �iT E ►•� QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION KNAPP CHEVROLET SAN JACINTO FORD i UNIT PRICc EXT. PR10E UNIT PR10E EXT. PRICc I UNIT P21Cc EXT. PRICc UPJIT PRICcIEXT. PRICE 1 1 each EIGHT PASSENGER CARRIER VEHICLE, $11,937.00 NO RESPO SE per specifications. I . ' _ ( MAKE 1985 Chev I I I MODEL Suburban ( I I ( DELIVERY � 90 -120 Days I I - .I ( I I I � I I I I � I I I I I I ( � I . I1 I-1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1-- I I I I I I I I I i t � I I I I � I I I I I I ( I I � i I � i I . � � i I ____�. T =RM� � I i � I L I I Y Ur VAY 1 U'e.'N • B1� TABULATIO,V Attachment "1" ANNUAL CONCRETE PIPE CONTRACT ill 8501 -:;9 1 -31 -85 2:00 P.M. it ^'II QTY UNIT I DESCRIPTION WHITE SUPPLY CO. GIFFORD HILL PIPE COMP. MONROE FERRELL CONCRETE ;PARKER BROTHERS �" j UNIT PRICE EXT. PRICE UNIT PRICE EXT. PRICE UNIT PRICE EXT. PRICE UNIT PRICcIEXT. PZ10E I ANNUAL CONCRETE PIPE CONTRACT, NO RESPON E er specifications. 1500 ft. 112" RCP -T & G 4.71 $ 7,065.001 4.46 $ 6,690.00 5.01 7,515.00 2 31300 ft. 15" RCP - T & G 5.31 $20,178.001 5.04 1 $19,152.00 1 5.66 $21,508.00 3 1800—F ft (18" RCP - T & G 6.07 $10,926.001 5.76 1 $10,368.00 1 6.47 $11,646.00 4 (1000 ft 24" RCP - T & G 9.13 a 9,130.001 8.64 $ 8,640.00 1 9.71 9,710.00 5 A 500 ( ft 30" RCP - T & G 13.04 $ 6,520.001 12.34 ( $ 6.170.00 ( - -- - - - - -- G 100 ft 136" RCP - T & G 18.76 $ 1,876.001 17.77 1 $ 1,777.00 1 - - - - -- 7 100 1 ft 42" RCP - T & G 26.71 $.2,671.001 25.28 ( $ 2,528.00 - -- ------- 13 � 1000 ft 148" RCP - T & G 32.93 $32,93 00 31.19 $31,190.00 - -- - - - - -- 111 I i ( TOTAL $91,296.001 ( $86,515.00 ( 1$50,379.00 DELIVERY 2 -6 Hours ( I As , -;c4. ks Specified _ SPECIAL CONDITION Vendor br ke down _ ( in route o bid I _ opening. ____ I aids mailed to six vendors. ! ( I I CITY OF E'.•1YT0:•.'N . BID TABULATIChW ��;;��; SnLE OF nBANDONED VEHICLES I'Alit 'L ITE�� I QTY UNIT I DESCRIPTION � � ~`M. 'E. � TAYLOR' • UrJIT PRICc EXT. PRICE � UNIT PRICE EXT. PR]Cc •UNIT PRICr EXT. PRIG: i UNIT PR1CcIEXT. PRJCE 1 73 lot SALE OF ABANDONED VEHICLES, per $1,100.00 I specifications.�� I I I I � I I . ..._.. .. I I I I � I I i i I ( I I � I I I I _I I I � I I I I _� I i l � � I I I I I I ( I - I I. � � I I I I I i I l I i I I �I I I I � i 1 I I I I I I I I I I I � 1-- - -I I I � I I I I I . I -; - -• I I � I I I 1 ' __� - -- - --- - - -�. 00 • � i � N ... ._ . -- - ---- -- _. __. ._.._ _ ... �_ _ .. N i � =F "_ � � . � � 1 �