1984 08 23 CC Minutes40823 -1
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN
August 23, 1984
The City Council of the City of Baytown, Texas, met in
regular session on Thursday, August 23, 1984, at 6:30 p.m.
in the Council Chamber of the Baytown City Hall with the
following attendance:
Fred T. Philips
Jimmy Johnson
Perry M. Simmons
Ron Embry
Roy L. Fuller
Gerald Dickens
Allen Cannon
Fritz Lanham
Larry Patterson
Ron McLemore
Eileen P. Hall
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Mayor
City Manager
Assistant City Manager
Assistant City Attorney
City Clerk
The meeting was called to order with a quorum present.
The invocation was offered by Councilman Simmons, afterwhich
the following business was transacted:
Consider Minutes for Council Meeting Held August 9, 1984
Councilman Johnson moved for approval of the minutes
for the meeting held August 91 1984; Councilman Fuller
seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons,
Embry, Fuller and Dickens
Mayor Cannon
Nays: None
Receive Petitions
Gary Michalsky, 110 West Hunnicutt, presented a petition
which listed problems along North Commerce, West Hunnicutt
and West Adoue caused by businesses in the area. There is a
safety hazard due to paint storage and paint spray and odor
in the air. Unlicensed machinery is operated on the street
and equipment such as air conditioning units is stored on
city property. There is a dumpster that is located too
close to a fireplug and cars are allowed to park too close
to the fireplug. Another problem is material stacked around
the plug which makes it inaccessible. There are problems
with illegally parked vehicles and machinery and with the
loading and unloading of vehicles on the street. The
residents have to contend with noise all hours of the night,
along with night work and loud music and cursing. The
petitioners also requested no through truck signs on West
Hunnicutt and West Adoue.
40823 -2
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - August 23, 1984
Councilman Dickens moved to accept the petition and to
ask the city administration, as well as the traffic commission
to look into the problems; Councilman Johnson seconded the
motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons,
Embry, Fuller and Dickens
Mayor Cannon
Nays: None
R.C. Christian, 100 West Hunnicutt, reported that he
had difficulty with the painting that goes on and the loud
noise.
Councilman Philips suggested that the administration
write a letter to the owner of the business and advise him
of the complaints and ask if they can't get their operation
under control. He mentioned that the Occupational Safety
and Health Administration has stringent restrictions on the
use of paint and its effect on people.
Councilman Fuller asked that the staff be allowed to
investigate the problems of the area and report back to
Council.
Councilman Dickens suggested that the beginning of the
city easement could be painted bright red so that any city
employee passing that area could tell immediately that there
was an infraction.
Mayor Cannon inquired if
report on this matter at the
responded in the affirmative.
City Manager's Report
Mr. Lanham would be ready to
next meeting. Mr. Lanham
Map of Master Thoroughfare Plan - The map of the master
thoroughfare plan of the city includes traffic counts of
various locations in the city, as well as a comparison of
traffic counts over the past three years.
MNM Engineering Associates - At the last Council meeting,
Council authorized MNM Engineering Associates to prepare
plans and specifications for bids on an emergency generator,
and Council had asked that the staff check into the possi-
bility of an additional backup. In the third paragraph
down, the third sentence down the engineers say that given a
properly designed system, the proposed new unit would
provide a very reliable backup power for -city hall. Also,
they felt that the complexity of providing control schemes
to accommodate the second backup would actually contribute
to a lower overall reliability. The staff had also asked
the engineers to check into the possibility of moving the
generator that is downstairs upstairs to the same vicinity
as the new one and perhaps it could be used as a backup for
lighting. The engineers indicated that they feel that would
not be feasible, nor did they feel it would be feasible to
operate emergency lighting for the community building off
the old generator.
40823 -3
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - August 23, 1984
Councilman Fuller stated that he would like to address
additional backup to the main generator at a later time.
Mr. Lanham responded that when the consultants have completed
the plans, those will be brought to Council and the engineers
can discuss that point at that time; Council voiced no
objection.
Drainage - The Airhart Drive /Spur 201 drainage ditch
has been completed.
1984 Street Improvement Program - The contractor is
making good progress on West Adoue. Lime stabilization has
been completed and the curb work, and the street is ready
for surfacing, as is Hunnicutt. On Clayton, the curb and
gutter work has been completed and the sidewalk has been
completed. It is ready for surfacing, along with South
Sixth. On Kentucky the work has just begun, but the con-
tractor plans to be in on Saturday with asphalt machines to
begin surfacing. Some of the locations are near schools,
and the administration asked the contractor to give those
priority in an attempt to get the surfacing done before
Monday.
In response to an inquiry from Council, Mr. Lanham
stated that North Pruett is in the program and is one of the
streets that will be resurfaced -- the concrete portion
north of Spur 201.
North Burnett /Roseland Lift Station - The North Burnett
lift station should be completed by October 1. The Roseland
Oaks' work is about thirty (30 %) percent complete.
West Gulf /West Humble Community Development Project -
The contractor is setting forms for concrete pavement on
West Gulf.
Widening of Intersection at Garth /Cedar Bayou Lynchburg -
The concrete is in place on the west side; therefore, that
job is about twenty (20 %) percent complete.
Annual Employees Picnic - Mr. Lanham requested that
Council return their requests for tickets to the annual
employees picnic.
Receive Six -Month Audit Report
Dave Start with the firm of Gerace, Hullum, Start and
Company, P. C.., Certified Public Accountants, explained
that Council had been furnished with a copy of the general
purposes financial statements covering the reporting entity,
City of Baytown, plus the Baytown Area Water Authority, over
which the City of Baytown exercises considerable oversight.
The financial statements include the general funds and
enterprise funds, omitting the Fiduciary fund types, the
Debt Service fund, Capital Projects fund, or General Long -
Term Debt and General Fixed Assets account groups. According-
ly, the accountants' opinion is qualified for the omission
of those funds. Otherwise, the report does show the financial
position of the City of Baytown and the report reflects that
budgetary objectives will be achieved.
40823 -4
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - August 23, 1984
Councilman Simmons stated that in his nearly five years
on City Council that his greatest disappointment has been
that he has not generated or obtained the support for reviewing,
revising or putting some restraints on the escalation of
sick leave. He noted that the report reflects that since
last March 31, the vested employee benefits increased $706,000
of which $532,000 is accrued sick pay. It is with the
accrued sick pay that Councilman Simmons has a problem. The
City of Houston has a much larger problem, and both The Chronicle
and The Post have exposed that serious problem, indicat ng
that one employee who recently retired received benefits of
approximately $118,000. The total City of Baytown vested
employee benefits is $2,799,531. This is an unfunded liability
and represents a future demand against the taxpayers of this
city. The taxpayers should be alerted that at some point in
time, they will be forced to pay this and the amount continues
to escalate.
Councilman Simmons emphasized that Council really wants
the employees to have the best of benefits. Four out of the
last five years cost of living increases have been granted,
hospitalization has been granted that covers the employee
and 80% of dependent coverage, dental coverage has been
added, the compensation plan has been upgraded and employees
are not unprotected with sick leave. However, citizens
should not have to pay for vested employee benefits.
Councilman Simmons said that he wasn't suggesting to do away
with what is already here, but to place some restraints to
deter the escalation.
Councilman Fuller mentioned that every year this subject
is discussed and that he felt that Council is in agreement
that this needs to be studied.
Mayor Cannon inquired if Council desired to schedule a
work session to discuss the sick leave policy. The City
Manager mentioned that Council would be meeting to discuss
the budget on Tuesday morning and inquired if perhaps Council
would like to discuss this at that time. Council agreed to
discuss the sick leave policy on Tuesday, August 281 when
Council is scheduled to discuss the proposed budget.
In response to an inquiry from Council regarding the
reason for a six -month audit, Mr. Lanham explained the six -
month audit is a charter requirement, and the brief audit is
the least that can be done to comply with the charter. He
suggested this is one of the things that may be deleted at
the time of a charter revision.
Hold Public Hearing for City of Baytown Budget for 1984 -85
Fiscal Year at 7:00 p.m.
Mayor Cannon called to order the hearing on the proposed
budget for the fiscal year 1984 -85 of the City of Baytown.
He explained that anyone desiring to testify in the hearing
should sign the register provided in the hallway, because
that will establish the speaking order. Since no one had
indicated a desire to speak, Mayor Cannon requested that
Fritz Lanham, City Manager, summarize the proposed budget.
40823 -5
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - August 23, 1984
Mr. Lanham emphasized that the hearing is being conducted on
the h� os��ed budget. He mentioned that this year the staff
had an additional limiting factor in trying to anticipate
next year's revenues -- the fact that the city has not
received the preliminary and certainly not the final assessed
valuation figures for property tax purposes. As many of you
know, this year, we became a part of the Harris County
Appraisal District. The district is charged with the appraisal
of every piece of property in Harris County. They have not
been able to provide the city with that information. In the
past, when the appraisals were made in house, the staff was
able to have a good estimate of what the assessed valuation
would be by this time in the budget planning process. This
hearing does not include a hearing on revenue sharing. It
is a hearing on the general fund, the water and sewer fund
expenditures. The total expenditures that are in this
proposed budget are $31,528,659 which is a 3.38% increase
over the current budget. There are no increases in numbers
of full time employee positions. In fact, there is a
reduction of 4 positions. There are no major changes in
services or programs that the city provides in the proposed
budget with the exception of one -- mandatory garbage bag
program. This would require citizens to place garbage in
either plastic or paper bags rather than cans. More than
50% of the people are presently utilizing bags. Mr. Lanham
stated that he had given a brief summary, but if Council had
any questions, he would be happy to provide additional
information. Since there were no questions, Mayor Cannon
closed the hearing.
Consider City of Baytown Land Management and Use Plan for
the Brownwood Hazard Area
Fritz Lanham, City Manager, stated that the plan to be
considered is required by the agreement between the Federal
Emergency Management Agency and the City of Baytown for the
acquisition of property under the Section 1362 program. The
first step in the process involved the development of a plan
by the city staff which would be consistent with that agreement.
The plan was reviewed with the Hazard Mitigation Team
composed of state and federal agency representatives on July
24. various alternatives for handling debris clearance and
for land management and reuse were reviewed by the Mitigation
Team and have been carefully considered by the city staff.
The staff feels that the recommendations contained in the
report are the most feasible of the alternatives considered.
Mr. Lanham stated that he would like for the two major
elements of the plan -- cleanup and land use to be reviewed
with Council. Mr. Lanham called on Norman Dykes, Director
of Public Works, to review the portion of the plan having to
do with cleanup.
Mr. Dykes reported that debris removal would include
the cleanup of things such as downed utility lines, uprooted
trees, abandoned vehicles and remains of houses. This plan
is going to be expensive and a very difficult task. What
was once approximately 300 homes in a low lying neighborhood
surrounded by water is now a severely damaged area con-
taining downed utility lines and uprooted trees and aban-
doned vehicles. Scattered remains of the homes and contents
still remain in the yards. Concrete slabs and paved drive-
ways being in some cases the only signs of what previously
was a'"home. Some houses still have wall studs remaining
which are still supporting roofs. Others appear to be less
damaged. The cleanup task will be more difficult and expensive
40823 -6
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - August 23, 1984
because some of the property owners still maintain ownership
of their homes and lots. The remainder of the property will
still be owned by the City of Baytown as a result of the
1362 Acquisition Program. All the property owners in the
Brownwood Hazard Area will be given an opportunity to have
their property cleaned up whether or not they sold their
lots to FEMA or if they had no insurance, they will be given
that opportunity. The cleanup will be financed jointly
between FEMA and the City of Baytown in a manner similar to
that used immediately after Alicia. It is expected that the
cleanup will be accomplished by contract forces with the
city being responsible for taking and awarding of the bids.
An accurate record will be kept of all the costs to satisfy
both city regulations and FEMA regulations. Cleanup activities
will fall into three general categories:
1. Removal of abandoned vehicles;
2. Removal of utility lines;
3. Removal of debris which includes structures and
fallen or dead trees.
The abandoned motor vehicles is a problem a little different
than the rest of the cleanup in that we have to comply with
all the state laws involving motor vehicles and their disposal.
Those may be removed by enforcement of the Texas Abandonment
Motor Vehicle Act. The city will attempt to notify all
owners of the cars there by looking at the state registration
and mailing a notice to these people. The abandoned motor
vehicles which belong to someone other than the owner of the
property on which the vehicle is located may be removed by
the inspection department with written permission from the
land owner. Abandoned motor vehicles located on public
property may be removed by the enforcement of Chapter 18 of
the Code of Ordinances which declares that these vehicles
are a public nuisance. All of the vehicles will be impounded
and later sold at public auction unless the property owner
or the owner of the vehicle elects to remove it after due
notice. Concerning the utilities, utility companies have
been contacted and they will be responsible for the removal
of their facilities as necessary. The big item is the
debris removal itself which is that section concerning the
homes, appliances, trees and the other debris. This will be
done by contract. Phase I will consist of probably three
contracts each covering a specific area of Brownwood.
Debris on properties which were conveyed to FEMA, and thence
to the City of Baytown, the debris on street rights of way
and the debris on private property if the owner will give
the city permission to go on his property will all be cleaned
up in Phase I.
One method considered for cleanup of debris was to have
the structures demolished, have a contractor clean it up and
have it hauled off to a sanitary landfill. This contract
would cost at least $1,000,000 which would be very expensive.
Another method considered which the staff feels will be much
cheaper would be to burn the debris in the hazard area and
have the remains moved to certain locations within the
hazard area where the debris could be covered with dirt.
This method of cleanup has be to coordinated with the State
Health Department, the Texas Air Control and Harris County
Pollution Control Department. Plans are being developed in
cooperation with these agencies to perform this sort of
cleanup. Cost for this method of cleanup excluding the
cover material is estimated to be $600,000.
40823 -7
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - August 23, 1984
The administration's recommendation is to select the
less expensive method. The plan would provide that after
the debris is burned that the remaining debris would be
placed in piles and then covered with soil to comply with
State Health Department regulations. This placement of
earth could be located so as to form levees or dams for the
lakes which are described in the land use plan. Almost
30,000 cubic yards of soil will be required to cover the
debris which will cost approximately $150,000. This would
include the hauling and spreading of the soil over the
debris to provide the two feet of cover which is required by
the health department. The total costs then for this method
of cleanup would be estimated at $750,000. Debris cleanup
is estimated to be $600,000 of that cost and the administration
expects to receive 70% federal funding or $420,000, leaving
a balance of $180,000 for the city to fund. The soil cover
costs will be about $150,000 with 75% of that cost being
federally funded ($112,500) and the city's share being
$37,500. The administration recommended that the city's
share be funded by using $130,000 in Community Development
Funds and $100,000 in 1984 -85 Revenue Sharing Funds.
This method of demolition and disposal would require
about one year to accomplish after the award of bids to
successful contractors.
Phase II of the cleanup operation, will involve those
properties that were not sold to FEMA and had not been
cleared by the city with consent of the owners. Provisions
are contained in city ordinances, as well as state laws,
which require the removal of debris by the property owners.
It is expected that the total cleanup plan would require
three years to accomplish and every effort would be made to
coordinate the cleanup and disposal plan with the anticipated
land use plan, both in timing of the activities and location
of disposal sites. As a result of this plan, the entire
area should be clear of all debris and in condition for
implementation of the proposed land use plan. This concluded
Mr. Dykes' presentation.
Bobby Rountree, Director of Parks and Recreation,
presented the land use portion of the plan. In developing
the proposed plan, three alternative plans were considered.
All of the proposed alternative plans addressed the natural
areas, wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat, urban forest
setting, etc. All proposed alternatives are consistent with
city ordinances which establish the basis for Baytown's
eligibility for participating in the flood insurance program.
The land use plans must also be consistent with an agreement
between FEMA and the City of Baytown for property acquisition.
The planning process will combine the following elements
site, use and operation. The site plan will document the
physical characteristics of the area which will include the
shorelines, wetlands, tree groupings, elevations, streets,
slabs and sidewalks, ditches and drainage areas. The use
plan itself will indicate, but not be limited to the public
use areas to include fishing lakes, picnic and camping
areas, boat ramps, parking facilities, hiking, biking and
jogging trails, etc. The natural areas will also be in-
dicated in the use plan. Vehicle traffic patterns and
access to the public use areas will also be established.
40823 -8
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - August 23, 1984
The operational plan itself will consist of two areas --
operations and maintenance which include the public use of
the area creating the need for law enforcement, litter
control, grounds and facility maintenance. Cost estimates
as well as schedules will be developed for these uses. The
second area is education and public information which entails
safety regulations and rules pertaining to the use of the
area which will be developed and posted.
As previously mentioned in the report, three alterna-
tive land use plans were prepared. Alternative Plan I
includes regular mowing of those areas deeded to the city by
FEMA as well as installation of litter containers and litter
removal. This plan is the least desirable and is therefore,
not recommended. Alternative Plan II includes the development
of the lakes inside the perimeter road, and development of
city owned property on the exterior of the perimeter road.
A consultant should be employed to develop a master plan.
Phase I of Alternative II consists of the following:
1. Identify elevations inside the perimeter road;
2. Outline areas to be used for lakes and determine
properties to be acquired;
3. Acquire lake properties, install free flow drainage
pipe under the perimeter road and construct necessary
levees;
4. Construction of boat ramps and parking areas on the
bay side of the perimeter road.
Phase II of Alternative II will be to excavate lake
properties, construct fishing piers on lakes as well as
properties on the bay side of the perimeter road.
Alternative Plan III includes a long range goal to
acquire and develop all the property in the Brownwood Hazard
Area. This plan would be accomplished in phases as time and
money permits. The possibility of the area being made
available as a state park should be pursued. The adminis-
tration recommended that Alternative Plan II be adopted and
that Phase I of that plan be implemented. Phase I of that
plan includes acquisition of lake properties and the con-
struction of three boat ramps and three picnic areas. The
estimated cost of this phase is $611,000. An application
for matching funds has been submitted to the Texas Parks and
Wildlife Department in the amount of $255,500. The city's
match of this grant would also be $255,500. Also included
is $100,000 for consultants, engineering, appraisals and
survey fees, as well as title work. Phase II of Alternative
Plan II should be implemented upon completion of Phase I. A
grant application for development should be submitted to the
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department prior to completion of
the initial phase. It is also recommended that Alternative
Plan III be adopted as a continuation of Alternative Plan
II. It should be considered a long term project that could
be accomplished over a period of years.
40823 -9
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - August 23, 1984
State park status for Brownwood should be sought upon
approval of this plan.
There are three factors which limit the city's ability
to proceed with the plan: (1) the pending litigation re-
garding the Brownwood Hazard Area, (2) the possible need
for condemnation and (3) the availability of funds. If
enough monies are made available through the various agencies,
this project probably could be accomplished in a three year
period.
Mr. Lanham summarized that the administration's recom-
mendations are with regard to debris removal that Council
consider the approval of Alternative I which is to burn the
debris in several locations in the hazard area and the
remaining debris would be moved to specified locations
within the area where it would be covered with dirt.
With regard to land use, the recommendation is to
approve Alternative Plan II and III. Alternative Plan II
includes the development of lakes inside the perimeter road
and development of city owned property on the exterior of
the perimeter roads. Alternative III is recommended as a
continuation of Alternative Plan II and that is the long
range plan for the acquisition of all properties in the
Brownwood Hazard Area for development of open space and park
areas. This portion of the plan should include seeking
state park status for the Brownwood Hazard Area. This con-
cluded the administration's presentation of the plan.
Kitty Allen, resident of Lakewood, appeared to oppose
the development of the Brownwood Hazard Area into a state
park. Mrs. Allen felt that the state now has a sufficient
number of state parks and that there would be no reason to
burden the taxpayers with another one. She felt that a
state park would further damage property values, and she
mentioned that she has become embarrassed to let people know
that she is from Baytown because Baytown is known as the
city that is sinking. Another problem with having a state
park at that location is that it will increase traffic
significantly. Mrs. Allen also felt that Brownwood Park
would provide a safe place for robbers and muggers. There-
fore, she recommended that no park of any kind be developed
and that access to the area be completely destroyed, leaving
the area to return to its natural state.
Glen Walker, resident of Baytown and former Mayor, con-
gratulated Council on consideration of some very worthwhile
plans. He felt that the proposed plan is not premature, but
almost too late. He mentioned that the city has been
attempting to deal with Brownwood for a long period of time,
and the opportunity is now here to make that beautiful spot
available for many people to enjoy, the public in general,
as well as many people who may not be able to travel the
United States, but could travel a very short distance. Mr.
Walker concurred that there would be expenses involved in
acquiring the property not yet available; some expenses
involved in clearing the land, which will be necessary
anyway; some additional expense to provide access for public
use and enjoyment of an area that has been desirable in the
past and can be again. From a public image point of view,
the area has become a liability. People who have lived
40823 -10
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - August 23, 1984
there and enjoyed Brownwood for many years would agree that
the national publicity received concerning Brownwood has
been a liability. There is an opportunity now to make it an
asset -- an attraction where people would not come to see
sinking homes, but to enjoy mother nature. Some of those
people would be spending dollars in Baytown, and sales tax
collected would help to defer costs incurred. Mr. Walker
concluded by saying that he felt Council is on the brink of
• great decision and that Council has the opportunity to do
• great service, not only to the citizens of Brownwood who
have suffered a long time, but to all those who have followed
with empathy their plight for a long long time.
Councilman Fuller moved to adopt the recommendations
for the Land Management and Use Plan for the Brownwood
Hazard Area as follows:
1. Alternative No. 1 regarding cleanup;
2. Alternative No. 2 regarding land use and acqui-
sition;
3. Alternative No. 3 as the City of Baytown's goal in
acquiring the entire Brownwood hazard area for
park and recreational purposes, when and if,
funding becomes available.
Also, the motion included that the City of Baytown
shall pursue the possibility of this area eventually becoming
a part of the Texas State Park System. Councilman Philips
seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons,
Embry, Fuller and Dickens
Mayor Cannon
Nays: None
Jean Shepherd, former resident of Brownwood, requested
more information about the possibility of the homeowner
having his property cleared by the city and payment of that
cleanup being financed through FEMA. Mr. Lanham responded
that the administration will develop a release or an agree-
ment that the property owner would sign before any equipment
moves on the property.
Ms. Shepherd said that she had read that, but she was
interested in what kind of release would be required and
what kind of equipment would go onto the property? Is this
just for removal of debris or what? Mr. Lanham said that
the debris would be removed, as well as the foundation.
Ms. Shepherd inquired if he was speaking of permission
to remove the entire structure? Mr. Lanham responded in the
affirmative.
Ms. Shepherd then inquired if this would include cleanup
without that type removal? Mr. Lanham said that he wouldn't
think that it would include sending people in there to pick
up debris by hand. The plan is based on the assumption that
heavy equipment would be brought in and materials pushed
together for handling.
40823 -11
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - August 23, 1984
Ms. Shepherd inquired if the homeowner did not give
permission, would the burning area or fill area be made
available to them so that they could take their own debris
there. Mr. Lanham said that he would think so, in fact he
felt that the plan would be developed in such a fashion that
if the homeowner put the debris out so that it would be on
public property, where equipment could operate without
getting on private property, he felt that the FEMA funds
would cover that sort of thing.
Mayor Cannon pointed out that the citizens would need
to do this during the time limitations so that the city
could get the benefits of FEMA funding.
Mr. Lanham, in response to a question on time restric-
tions, stated that the city would want to clear the private
property at the same time that the public property is cleared.
There will be plans and specifications which will indicate
to begin on a certain day, move debris to certain area, and
then move it off. This will be published in advance so that
property owners would be notified in order to prepare their
property. The city would want to go in one time and complete
an area.
Ms. Shepherd inquired if someone wanted the total slab
removed, the city would do that at no cost to the homeowner?
Mr. Lanham responded in the affirmative. FEMA has said that
they will participate in that to the point of 70 %. There
will be no individual cost to the homeowner.
Hold Public Hearing on Application of James E. Harding to
Operate Allied Cab and City Cab Service in Baytown at
8:00 p.m.
Mayor Cannon informed those present that it would be
necessary to register on the list provided in the lobby be-
cause this would decide the speaking order for the hearing.
He asked all those present who desired to speak at the hear-
ing to stand to be sworn. The Mayor explained that the
hearing was being held for the purpose of receiving public
input on whether convenience and necessity require the
granting of the application. He explained further that
everyone desiring to present information would be given an
opportunity to do so and that the proceeding was not an
adversary type proceeding. The purpose of the hearing was
to receive testimony from the public about the application,
and if anyone had any questions, those were to be addressed
to the Mayor and with the aid of the city staff the question
would be addressed.
Ron McLemore, Assistant City Attorney, outlined the
procedure for issuance of certificates of public convenience
and necessity for taxicab permits. Council members had been
furnished with copies of the application from Mr. Harding
and other supporting documentation. Mayor Cannon called
upon Mr. Harding.
Jim Harding, President and Chairman of the Board of
Allied and City Cab, noted that his experience in the
taxicab business dates back to 1961. He has been a driver,
dispatcher and owner. He also has had experience in ownership
40823 -12
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - August 23, 1984
of wreckers, and he is a mechanic. He has worked with the
public for years. Mr. Harding has known Gordon and Joy Hart
for a number of years. He said that he had met with Mrs.
Hart and others involved in the company and made a substantial
offer which was refused; however, Mr. Harding stated that if
in the future Mrs. Hart should decide to accept, the offer
stands. He said that he had questioned about ten people
each time he visited Baytown with regard to taxi service.
The biggest complaint is that taxicabs are hot. There is
only one car that has air conditioning. The other cars' air
conditioners are out. The cars are not maintained properly,
and they're also very dirty. He stated that in his years of
operation, his car is always clean and the air conditioner
is operable. The drivers are good, but personal hygiene was
a problem. Another problem listed was rudeness of the
dispatchers.
Mr. Harding stated that the vehicles that he planned to
lease from San Jacinto Ford are five Crown Victoria LTD
police type vehicles with heavy duty suspension, heavy
duty equipment in the cooling system, transmission oil
cooler, air conditioning and power steering.
Presently, in the city there are Red Top Cab and Safe-
way Cab Companies operating, and Mr. Harding would like to
operate Allied and City Cab Companies in order to minimize
liability. Cars would be maintained by San Jacinto Ford.
A taxicab is a public conveyance. People are paying you to
come pick them up. It's a service and Mr. Harding stated
that he had always been dedicated to service. The cars will
be equipped with two -way radios, fire extingushers and the
Argo -type meter, not the standard type. The meters will be
calibrated by the City of Houston to the City of Baytown
standards. He emphasized that any car suffering mechanical
difficulties of any kind would be removed from service and
repaired immediately. The drivers will be carefully screened
by Mr. Harding and the general manager to assure high quality
drivers. Insurance on taxicabs is extremely high; therefore,
an irresponsible person should not be allowed to drive. Mr.
Harding assured Council that he would handle complaints
himself. One thing that he would implement would be a
senior citizens program. While Mr. Harding drove a cab for
Yellow Cab, he associated with the Medicare and Medicade
program for almost three years which entails the handling of
the elderly and handicapped. Mr. Harding stated that if he
were granted the permits, within ten days, there would be
cars on the street.
The Allied Cab will be a white cab with a blue top with
a cruise light that works. The City Cab will be a white cab
with a gray top with a cruise light that works. In closing,
Mr. Harding said that he was not present to criticize the
present cab service because they were good people, but the
citizens of Baytown deserve better.
Councilman Johnson said that the complaints that he is
aware of have to do with response time and mentioned if the
permits were granted, that he would like to see response
time improved.
Mr. Harding responded that if the cabs are short on the
street, he would drive himself. If no cabs are available,
Mr. Harding would use his car and provide the service with
no charge. The whole point being that the citizens must be
served.
40823 -13
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - August 23, 1984
In response to an inquiry concerning insurance coverage,
Mr. Harding stated that the vehicles are full coverage
vehicles which is above the current city ordinance. He also
stated in response to Council that he felt that there is
enough business in Baytown for two companies to co- exist.
Another question posed by Council had to do with rates.
Mr. Harding responded that rates in Baytown are the lowest
in the state. Rates have not been raised since 1979, and
Mr. Harding felt that he would have to take a "look and see"
attitude and make a determination at that point on whether
he could operate under the current rate structure.
Allied and City Cab Companies would be dispatched from
136 South Alexander on a 24 hour per day basis. Council had
no further questions of Mr. Harding.
Tommy Bright, spokesman for Joy Hart, addressed Council.
Mr. Bright stated that he has been driving a cab for awhile
himself and that he had conducted a sampling from his
customers. Those people find no fault with the service.
Mr. Bright read the following statement, "I, Joy Hart, owner
of Safeway Cab Company and Redtop Cab Company, wish to file
a protest against the application for five taxi permits
under the names of Allied Cab Company and City Cab Company.
Under our ownership, Safeway Cab Company has served Baytown
since 1969, and Redtop Cab Company has served Baytown since
1971. Currently, we average 175 calls per day shift and 100
calls on the evening shift. We have eight to nine cabs
running each day shift and five to six during the evening
shift. The day shift runs from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.; the
evening shift from 6:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. We have twelve
permits. Our cabs are radio dispatched. On discharging a
passenger at destination via radio, the driver is given the
nearest address to pickup, or stands by at a central location.
According to our dispatching records, the average waiting
period for our customers is only 15 to 20 minutes. According
to these figures, we do not feel that another cab company is
needed in the Baytown city limits. I would also like to
inform the City Council that time calls are accepted from
customers for special reasons, for instance, children that
need to be picked up from school, people needing to get to
work, for doctor's appointments and airplane flights. Our
service takes down phone numbers for those of our customers
who wish us to do so, and when the cab arrives to pick up
the customer, the dispatcher calls the customer and notifies
him or her that their taxi has arrived. We discovered that
the citizens of Baytown like this procedure, especially the
elderly and those living in apartments.
As you know, our cab company has the City of Baytown
Senior Citizen Taxi Program. In this program, the senior
citizens are allowed eight rides a month anywhere within
the Baytown city limits. We have over 517 senior citizens
which benefit from this program. These senior citizens
charge their rides, and we later send an invoice to the
city. As the drivers are paid each day and the invoice
paid twice a month, the cash flow to our cab drivers is
very important. All our drivers and dispatchers live in
Baytown and are raising their families here. Some of them
have been with the company since 1969 or longer. Two other
40823 -14
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - August 23, 1984
cab companies operating in Baytown, if allowed, will dilute
our cash flow. Mr. Harding needs two cab companies in Bay-
town, he says, but he has never lived here or worked in
Baytown. In closing, I would like to call to the attention
of Council members that in all of the years of service
Redtop Cab Company and Safeway Cab Company have not received
one complaint from you. I am continually expanding our
services in order to keep up with the demand, and I would
appreciate it if City Council would give me the opportunity
to place more cabs on the streets if it is determined there
is a need. Our records are open to any Council member that
wishes to inspect our performance. I would like also to
invite any City Council member to come to the stand and
monitor our calls."
Council inquired if the allegation that the cabs are
not air conditioned is true. Mrs. Hart responded that all
the cars are equipped with air conditioning; however, from
time to time those do fail. There is a mechanic on 24 hour
call.
Council inquired of Mr. Lanham
received through the senior citizen
Lanham responded that each year the
a survey of the seniors and that the
plaints, but the one complaint that
have is the wait involved.
concerning complaints
taxicab program. Mr.
administration performs
Bre have been few com-
the seniors do seem to
Councilman Philips mentioned the growth in the Baytown
area and with it the market for taxicab service. He also
mentioned that competition is a good healthy thing.
In response to an inquiry from Council, Mrs. Hart
stated that response time has not changed very much. The
terminal has been moved to a more central location which is
probably the main reason. Each year permits have been added
for increased population.
Roxanne Gillum, a resident of Baytown, stated that she
had had personal experience with a prolonged wait for taxicab
service, and she felt that another cab service would produce
healthy competition.
Since there were no others present who desired to
speak, the Mayor declared the public hearing on public
convenience and necessity closed.
Consider Proposed Resolution Declaring that Public Convenience
and Hecessity Require Additional Taxicab Service
Councilman Philips moved for adoption of the resolution.
The resolution died for lack of second.
Mayor called for a recess. When the meeting reconvened,
the following business was transacted:
N
40823 -15
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - August 23, 1984
Consider Proposed Resolution Approving a Grant Application
to the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department for the Acqui-
sition of Property in the Brownwood Hazard Area for Park
Development
Filing of this grant application will begin the process
that will be needed to implement one of the recommendations
for the land use plan for Brownwood. On this particular
grant, there was a July 31 deadline; therefore, the admin-
istration filed the grant with the understanding that if
Council failed to approve making the application, the staff
could withdraw same.
Bobby Rountree, Director of Parks and Recreation,
explained that the grant would implement Alternative Plan II
of Phase I of the land use plan which would be acquisition
of the properties for the lakes to be developed, the develop-
ment of three boat ramp areas and three picnic areas on the
exterior portion of the perimeter road adjacent to the bays.
The requested amount is $255,500 and the city's match would
be the same. The administration recommended approval.
Councilman Dickens moved for adoption of the reso-
lution; Councilman Embry seconded the motion. The vote
follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons,
Embry, Fuller and Dickens
Mayor Cannon
Nays: None
RESOLUTION NO. 886
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN
RATIFYING AND AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECRE-
ATION OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN TO MAKE APPLICATION TO THE
TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT FOR GRANT FUNDS IN THE
AMOUNT OF TWO HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED AND
N01100 ($255,500.00) DOLLARS FOR THE ACQUISITION AND DEVELOP-
MENT OF PARK LAND.
Consider Proposed Ordinance, Approving Applications of
Minex, Inc. to Drill Oil Wells on City -Owned Property
This matter was discussed at the last Council meeting,
but no action was taken and the matter was tabled. In the
audience are representatives of the owners of Minex, as well
as representatives of the signers of the petition presented
at the last meeting.
Councilman Dickens moved to remove the item from the
table; Councilman Fuller seconded the motion. The vote
follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons,
Embry, Fuller and Dickens
Mayor Cannon
Nays: None
40823 -16
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - August 23, 1984
The first person to speak was Jim Krizak, representa-
tive of Southwest Addition, who made a very lengthy presentation.
A copy of that presentation is attached to the minutes as
Attachment "A."
Ron McLemore, Assistant City Attorney, responded to the
areas of the presentation dealing with the present ordinance
and explained how that ordinance is currently being adminis-
tered.
With regard to the issue concerning oil drilling and
its effect on subsidence, Mr. Lanham stated that he had been
in contact with the subsidence district. The district
representative stated that there is the possibility that oil
drilling would cause subsidence but to what degree has not
been established. The district would be happy to conduct a
study to establish the effects of oil drilling on subsidence.
Bud Franklin, President of Minex, explained that Minex
had applied for permits and had strictly adhered to provisions
of the existing ordinance which tracks the Texas Railroad
Commission requirements for oil and gas drilling in the
State of Texas.
Mr. Franklin stated that he had obtained data from the
subsidence district which indicated that since 1979 subsi-
dence in this area has been negligible because of the move
to surface water. Mr. Franklin mentioned that when oil is
removed water enters the reservoir to replace the oil. He
also pointed out that Baytown is an oil town and another
oil well will not destroy the image of the city. He emphasized
that he and his company want to co- exist, but Minex feels
that it has certain rights and the company wants to exercise
those rights. He went on to say that the company can drill
the wells in a safe responsible manner, that noise can be
controlled and ingress and egress can be controlled. The
company has already stipulated that it will perform certain
functions to make this situation more palatable.
Councilman Simmons stated that he felt the city should
consider an ordinance that is more stringent to protect,
not only the citizens all over the city, but specifically
the citizens of Southwest Addition. He felt that Mr. Franklin
was very serious about doing whatever possible to conform to
the requirements of the ordinance; however, once the wells
have been drilled, further in time is what needs to be
considered. Once the proper precautions are not taken to
insure the safety and welfare of the citizens in advance,
then one does not know what the repercussions will be. As
far as Minex is concerned and the fact that the drilling of
15 to 20 wells has been mentioned, by the time Minex has
completed its drilling procedures and moved on, it may be
some time before subsidence or whatever the effects of Minex's
endeavors have been will be known. At that point, it will
be too late. As far as the bond requirements and the insurance
liability requirements of the present ordinance, those do
not provide adequate protection.
40823 -17
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - August 23, 1984
Councilman Simmons moved to table any action on the
proposed ordinance to grant four permits at this time;
continue to enforce the existing ordinances; set a work
session to try to amend and incorporate into the present
ordinance some of the suggested needs as to the bond and
liability requirements, and to have the city's legal staff
check with the Texas Railroad Commission for clarification
as to whether we can control drilling in the city's public
parks, and if so, to include in that ordinance that drilling
in city parks is prohibited. Also, included in the motion
is that no further permits be granted until authorized by
Council. Councilman Dickens seconded the motion.
In response to an inquiry from Council, Mr. Franklin
said that he did need to get on with his program, and
therefore, had no choice but to work as long and as dili-
gently as necessary to get these things resolved. He
expressed disappointment at not being able to move ahead
under the existing ordinance.
Councilman Dickens said that he understood that but
unfortunately, recently, the city had numerous applications
for permits. At some point, the Council needs to draw a
line and look at what is happening. Since the next Council
meeting is in three weeks, Councilman Dickens asked that
the motion include a special meeting. Also, Councilman
Dickens suggested that prior to the special meeting, a
work session be held with the applicants and the citizens
of Southwest Addition. He continued that he would like to
have input from both parties since part of the problem could
be communication. The vote follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons,
Embry, Fuller and Dickens
Mayor Cannon
Nays: None
Mayor Cannon mentioned that there is a meeting next
Thursday at 5:00 p.m. and Council could set this one for
6:30 p.m. Council concurred. Mr. Franklin inquired if it
would be appropriate to invite others in the oil drilling
industry to attend the meeting and Council encouraged him
to do so.
Consider Proposed Ordinance, Renaming Public Library Avenue
Mary Elizabeth Wilbanks Avenue
The Baytown Library Advisory Board has recommended
that Public Library Avenue be renamed Mary Elizabeth Wilbanks
Avenue to recognize Ms. Wilbanks for her many years of- service
to Sterling Municipal Library. The administration concurred
in this recommendation.
Councilman Simmons moved for adoption of the ordinance;
Councilman Philips seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons,
Embry, Dickens and Fuller
Mayor Cannon
Nays: None
40823 -18
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - August 23, 1984
ORDINANCE NO. 3922
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN,
TEXAS, CHANGING THE NAME OF PUBLIC LIBRARY AVENUE TO MARY
ELIZABETH WILBANKS AVENUE AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE
DATE THEREOF.
The administration will schedule a dedication ceremony.
Consider Proposed Ordinance, Establishing All Way Stops
for North Commerce and Forest; William and North Jones
The Traffic Commission considered establishment of all
way stops at North Commerce and Forest; William and North
Jones, but did not recommend placement of the stops because
those locations do not meet the necessary warrants.
Councilman Johnson pointed out that there was previously
an all way stop at William and North Jones which had been
removed.
Councilman Dickens stated that he really felt that a
four way stop is needed at North Commerce and Forest to help
slow the traffic. North Commerce is a wide street, and
people have a tendency to speed.
Councilman Dickens moved to adopt the ordinance providing
for an all way stop at North Commerce and Forest, but deleting
the all way stop for William and Jones. Councilman Simmons
seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Embry
Fuller and Dickens
Mayor Cannon
Nays: None
ORDINANCE NO. 3923
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN,
TEXAS, DESIGNATING THE INTERSECTION OF NORTH COMMERCE
STREET AND FOREST AVENUE AS AN ALL WAY STOP INTERSECTION;
PROVIDING FOR THE POSTING OF STOP SIGNS; REPEALING CONFLICT-
ING ORDINANCES HEREWITH; CONTAINING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PRE-
SCRIBING A MAXIMUM PENALTY OF TWO HUNDRED AND N01100
($200.00) DOLLARS FOR EACH VIOLATION THEREOF; AND PROVIDING
FOR THE PUBLICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF.
Consider Approval of Purchase Plan for Emergency Medical
Communications System
Council included $12,000 in the revenue sharing budget
for 1983 -84 to purchase the city's portion of an emergency
medical communications system. The state health department
in cooperation with Fletcher Hickerson and other users of
the service have worked out a plan for the acquisition of this
equipment. In addition to the radio equipment here at City Hall,
40823 -19
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - August 23, 1984
there would be radios at the three hospitals and ambulances
in the area. However, someone needs to coordinate preparation
of plans and the taking of bids; therefore, the administration
is requesting that Council approve the city being the agent
for doing this. Before awarding the bids, the city will
have the money on hand from the hospitals and others parti-
cipating so that the city will only be obligated to do that
portion pertaining to the City of Baytown. What the admin-
istration is requesting is that Council approve the plans
and when the bids are received, those will be brought to
Council for award.
Councilman Philips moved to approve the purchase plan
for emergency medical communications system; Councilman
Dickens seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons,
Embry, Fuller and Dickens
Mayor Cannon
Nays: None
Consider Authorization to Request the METRO Board of Directors
for a Statement of Policy in Regard to Providing Contract
Service Outside the METRO Area
The transit committee has been working very hard on a
plan for bus service of some type into Houston. One of the
possibilities the committee is investigating is contracting
for that service. The committee has talked to METRO and other
operators of bus service and METRO currently has no policy
on whether that entity will provide transit service outside
its boundaries. They do provide that service in one area
which was grandfathered. Therefore, the transit committee
would like permission to contact the METRO Board of Directors
for a statement of policy in regard to providing contract
service outside the METRO area.
Councilman Embry moved to authorize the Baytown Transit
Committee to request of the METRO Board of Directors a
statement of policy in regard to providing contract service
outside the METRO area; Councilman Fuller seconded the motion.
The vote follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Simmons, Embry,
Fuller and Dickens
Mayor Cannon
Nays: Councilman Johnson
Consider Proposed Resolution, Authorizing the City Manager
to Apply for Senior Citizen Taxi Program
Currently, the city pays 42% of the costs of the Senior
Citizens' Taxi Program. The Area Wide Agency on Aging pro-
vides funds in the amount of 58% to operate the program.
The staff feels that there is a possibility that the Urban
Mass Transit Agency would finance a portion of the 42% now
paid by the City of Baytown. Therefore, the administration
requested approval to submit an application for UMTA to
fund 50% of the 42 %.
40823 -20
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - August 23, 1984
Councilman Dickens moved for adoption of the resolution;
Councilman Embry seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons,
Embry, Fuller and Dickens
Mayor Cannon
Nays: None
RESOLUTION NO. 887
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OF THE CITY OF
BAYTOWN TO MAKE APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 91 OF THE URBAN
MASS TRANSIT ACT OF 1964, AS AMENDED, FOR GRANT FUNDS IN
THE AMOUNT OF TEN THOUSAND AND N01100 ($10,000.00) DOLLARS
FOR THE CITY OF BAYTOWN SENIOR CITIZENS' TAXICAB PROGRAM.
Review Plans and Specifications for Fire Department Radio
System and Request Authorization to Advertise for Bids
Several months ago, the administration had indicated
the estimated cost to provide the radio system for the fire
department was about $130,000. There is that much money left
from the purchase of the police radio system. Council
authorized Bernard Johnson to prepare plans and specifications
and during that process, the engineers discovered that one
of the old pieces of microwave equipment that would need
repair is not repairable due to the fact that parts are no
longer made for that particular piece of equipment. Now,
we find that it is necessary to replace that microwave system,
and the estimated cost of that is just under $43,000. If
Council approves the plans and specifications, Council will
also be indicating that money will be placed in the budget
to make up the deficit.
The new system will have up to twelve audio channels
which is more sophisticated. This equipment is not just for
the fire department. It is needed for the police system
also. The administration recommended approval of the plans
and specifications and requested authorization to advertise
for bids.
Councilman Simmons moved to accept the recommendation
of the administration; Councilman Dickens seconded the motion.
The vote follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons,
Embry, Fuller and Dickens
Mayor Cannon
Nays: None
Consent Agenda
On Item g, the award of the bid for annual fill sand
contract, the bids were tied; therefore, it was necessary to
draw lots to break the tie. Mayor Cannon drew the name of
Baytown Sand and Clay.
ig
40823 -21
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - August 23, 1984
In Items j and k, tabulations were not forwarded to
Council in the agenda packets. Those tabulations were placed
at the Council table. The low bidder on the reversible
windbreakers is J. D. Battle Uniform for the amount of $42.92
per unit or $4,166.15.
Low bidder for furnishing the food for the employees'
picnic is Demeris Barbecue with a bid of $3.50 per plate.
The administration recommended that the bid be awarded to
the low bidders on Items j and k and that according to the
lot drawn that Baytown Sand and Clay be awarded the bid on
Item g. With those changes, the administration recommended
approval of the Consent Agenda Item a through k.
Council considered the Consent Agenda as presented in
the packet as follows:
a. Proposed Ordinance No. 40823 -4, will
depository. The depository contract
received August 13, 1984. Six banks
specifications and four banks bid.
is that of Baytown State Bank and is
points over the Treasury Bill yield.
select a city
bids were
were given
the best bid
+.25 percentage
It is our recommendation that the Baytown State
Bank be awarded the depository contract for the
period October 1, 1984 through September 30, 1986.
b. Proposed Ordinance No. 40823 -5, will award the bid
for the purchase of replacement engine for street
sweeper. Bids were mailed to three vendors and
one bid was received. We feel the bid is more
than the engine should cost and recommend the bid
be rejected and the item rebid.
C. Proposed Ordinance No. 40823 -6, will award the bid
for the purchase of sheet piling. Three bids were
received. Steel Piling, Inc. submitted the low
bid of $4,721. However, they did not meet speci-
fications in regards to flange thickness. Skyline
Steel Corp. submitted the second low bid of
$5,482.93.
We recommend the low bidder meeting specifications,
Skyline Steel Corp., be awarded this contract.
d. Proposed Ordinance No. 40823 -7, will award the bid
for the installation of sheet piling. Bids were
mailed to 6 vendors. One bid was received. That
bid exceeded the engineering cost estimate by
roughly $15,000. Therefore, it is our recom-
mendation that this bid be rejected and the
Council grant permission to readvertise this item
for bid. Bid Amount received was $22,000. The
City's Engineering estimate was $7,500 for this
project.
40823 -22
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - August 23, 1984
e. Proposed Ordinance No. 40823 -81 will award the bid
for the annual tire and tube contract. Bids were
sent to 6 vendors. Three bids were received.
Firestone 0867 submitted the low bid on Items 1 -4,
6 -7, 91 13, 18 -22 and General Tire Service submitted
the low bid on Item 5, 8, 10 -12, 141-17, 23 -26.
The total bid price is $47,457.30.
We recommend the low bidders, Firestone #0867 and
General Tire be awarded this contract.
f. Proposed Ordinance No. 40823 -9, will award the bid
for the annual storage battery contract. Two bids
were received. Ted's Supply Company submitted the
low bid of $8,784.90.
We recommend the low bidder, Ted's Supply Company,
be awarded this contract.
g. Proposed Ordinance No. 40823 -10, will award the
bid for the annual fill sand contract. Five bids
were received. Baytown Sand and Clay Co. and
Right -Way Sand Co. submitted the low bid of $17,500.
The city charter indicates that in the event of a
tie that the Council will break a tie and award
the contract by the casting of lots. The City
Manager will provide for this process at the
Council meeting.
h. Proposed Ordinance No. 40823 -11, will award the
bid for the annual data processing paper contract.
Six bids were received. The Rein Company submitted
the low bid of $5,772.55.
We recommend the low bidder, The Rein Company, be
awarded this contract.
i. Proposed Ordinance No. 40823 -12, will award the
bid for three inch trash pump. Three bids were
received. The Wacker Corporation submitted the
low bid of $3,799.88.
We recommend the low bidder, Wacker Corporation,
be awarded this contract.
j. Proposed Ordinance No. 40823 -13, will award the
bid for reversible windbreakers for the Police
Department. The bids were due to be opened on
Wednesday, August 22, therefore we will have a
recommendation for you at the Council meeting.
k. Proposed Ordinance No. 40823 -141 will award the
bid for picnic catering services. These bids were
received on August 21, and we will have a recommen-
dation at the Council meeting.
40823 -23
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - August 23, 1984
Councilman Dickens moved to adopt the Consent Agenda
Items a through k as recommended by the administration;
Councilman Simmons seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons,
Embry, Fuller and Dickens
Mayor Cannon
Nays: None
ORDINANCE NO. 3924
AN ORDINANCE SELECTING A CITY DEPOSITORY; AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AND ATTEST TO A CONTRACT
WITH THE SELECTED DEPOSITORY; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE
DATE HEREOF. (Proposed Ordinance No. 40823 -4)
ORDINANCE NO. 3925
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF SKYLINE STEEL CORPORATION
FOR THE PURCHASE OF THE SUPPLY OF STEEL SHEET PILING FOR
BRUSH REPAIRS AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF
BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF FIVE THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED EIGHTY
TWO AND 93/100 ($5,482.93) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance
No. 40823 -6)
ORDINANCE NO. 3926
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF FIRESTONE AND GENERAL
TIRE SERVICE FOR THE ANNUAL TIRE AND TUBE CONTRACT AND
AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE
SUM OF FORTY SEVEN THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY SEVEN AND
30/100 ($47,457.30) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No.
40823 -8)
ORDINANCE NO. 3927
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF TED'S SUPPLY FOR THE
ANNUAL STORAGE BATTERY CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT
BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF EIGHT THOUSAND SEVEN
HUNDRED EIGHTY FOUR AND 90/100 ($8,784.90) DOLLARS. (Proposed
Ordinance No. 40823 -9)
ORDINANCE NO. 3928
A ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF BAYTOWN SAND AND CLAY
FOR THE ANNUAL FILL SAND CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT
BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF SEVENTEEN THOUSAND
FIVE HUNRED AND N01100 ($17,500.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed
Ordinance No. 40823 -10)
40823 -24
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - August 23, 1984
ORDINANCE NO. 3929
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF REIN COMPANY FOR THE ANNUAL
DATA PROCESSING PAPER CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY
THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF FIVE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED
SEVENTY TWO AND 55/100 ($5,772.55) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance
No. 40823 -11)
ORDINANCE NO. 3930
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF WACKER CORPORATION FOR THE
PURCHASE OF A THREE INCH TRASH PUIJP AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT
BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF THREE THOUSAND SEVEN
HUNDRED NINETY NINE AND 88/100 ($3,799.88) DOLLARS. (Proposed
Ordinance No. 40823 -12)
ORDINANCE NO. 3931
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF J. B. BATTLE UNIFORM
COMPANY FOR THE PURCHASE OF REVERSIBLE WINDBREAKERS AND
AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF
FOUR THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED SIXTY SIX AND 15/100 ($4,166.15)
DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 40823 -13)
ORDINANCE NO. 3932
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF DEMERIS BARBECUE FOR PICNIC
CATERING SERVICES AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF
BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF THREE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED AND N01100
($3,500.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 40823 -14)
For bid tabulations, see Attachments "B" through "K."
Consider Appointment to Clean City Commission to Replace
Lisa C. Petricek
Council will make this appointment at a future meeting.
Adjourn
There being no further business to be transacted, the
meeting was adjourned.
'1
Eileen P. Hall, City Clerk
Attachment "A"
HONORABLE NAYOR, NUMERS OF M CITY COUNCIL and CIMUZ OF BAYTOVIN
Minex, Incorporated has submitted applications to the City
of Baytown for the drilling of a number of oil wells on City property
which is designated to became Britton Park and on property which is
now Bayland Park. Both are adjoining and near the Southwest
Subdivision. The citizens of Baytown and the homeowners of the
Southwest Subdivision have asked me to present this petition to the
City Council.
We realize that Minex has mineral interest in these
properties. We realize that Minex feels that they have certain rights
to access to these minerals. It must be realized that the citizens of
Baytown, the City of Baytown, and the haneowners in the Southwest
Addition also have certain rights. Zhe City Council of Baytown has
the responsibility to protect these rights in every way possible.
We hereby respectfully make the following request directly
to the City Council:
1. Before issuing any new permits for the drilling of oil
wells that Ordinance No. 671 - Regulating the Drilling,
Completion and Operation of Oil Wells Within the City
Limits - be updated to provide adequate protection for
the City, the homeowner, and the private citizen.
Specifically some of these items include:
a. "Section 4 (7) (a) ... "the distance from► the well
to all parks, streets, alleys or other public
property, residences, ccmTbercial buildings and
structures situated within two hundred (2001)
- feet of the well location° .
Most cities require 400 feet. We request the
same.
b. Section 6, A ... "No well shall be drilled and
no permit shall be issued for any well to be
drilled in any location within a drilling unit
which location is nearer than tkv hundred (2001)
feet from any residence or building... -
change to 400 feet -
Most cities require 400 feet. We request the
same.
c. Section 9. Bond ...Such bond shall inure to the
benefit of the City of Baytown; shall be in foam
to comply herewith, and shall be in the amount
of Fifty Zhousand and N01100 ($50,000.00)
Dollars...
-1hi.s amount of bond is completely inadequate for
the coverage of any significant accident or
catastrophe.
d. Section 10, A - Public Liability and Prole2M
Damage: ...'•liaT�iSsty for bodily injury or
deat�i f:or one person shall not be less than one
Hundred Thousand and NO /100 ($100,000.00)
Dollars, and for any one accident not less than
three Hundred Zhousand and N0 1100 ($300,000.00)
Dollars...
Again this is completely inadequate protection
for a whole neighborhoods
Certain additions to ordinance No. 671 are also requested.
These include:
1. Access to Drilling Site - Drilling of oil and gas wells
require heavy equipment.. It is not reasonable for
contractors or drillers to use subdivision roadways
which are not designed for this purpose for access to
their well sites. If the use of such road is absolutely
necessary then a specific ingress and egress route is to
be designated by the City Engineer. An adequate cash
bond for road repair shall be posted with the City
Me driller before being granted a permit. Zhe repair
of these roadways shall be made immediately after
oompletion of the drilling. So long as the road is used
by heavy truck traffic associated with the oil or gas
wells, the cash bond shall be continued.
2. Noise - Wile Ordinance No. 671 requires drillers to use
mufflers on their equipment, the noise from certain
" mufflers" is not acceptable. Zhe noise limitation
should be set at decibels at 50 feet from the well
during drilling operation and at decibels during
normal well operation. No unusual squeaking, clanking
or other noises shall be allowed as part of the normal
operation.
3. Subsidence - Removal of oil from wells, especially
shallow wells, like the Goose Creek Field, will cause
subsidence. 'his is a real problem for areas like the
Southwest Addition. oil producers should be required to
re- inject equivalent amounts of water into the
formations being pumped. Zhis will minimize the amount
of subsidence. Since homeowners of Baytown have little
- 2 -
opportunity to recover damages to their property due to
subsidence, this is a very important addition to the
ordinance. This is especially true from the standpoint
of the unlimited number of wells which may be allowed in
the Goose Creek Field.
While Ordinance No. 671 provides reasonable regulations for
drilling within the City of Baytown, we find that certain parts of the
ordinance are apparently being ignored by the drillers. The City has
apparently not adequately reviewed the permit applications, the
drilling operations or the operating wells. For example:
Section 4: Application and Filing Fee - "Notice of the
ffling o eadi applica on shall be given by the applicant
to each owner and lessee of lots, blocks, and tracts within
their ling unit described in the application... At least
ten (10) days prior... notice shall be mailed by registered
mail... -
Section 6: Well Location - "No well shall be drilled and no
permit shall be issu—e=or any well... nor shall any well
be drilled within any of the streets or alleys, parks or
other public - Prot' unless authorized by an ordin recce—auly
passed by the City Council of the City of Baytown.-
Section 11: Unlawful to Permit Esca of Mud, Etc. -
A. It 9Ml be jjr-aawful for any person to permmit to escape
any mud, water, oil, slush or other waste matter...
Section 14: Well Workover ... °no well workover shall be
star or perfo --,M out first informing the City
Manager...
Section 15 A (7): Rules for Drillin .. *.make adequate
provisio for disposal of saltwater water or other impurities
which may be produced along with the oil..."
Section 15 A (10 (11) : Certification to the City Manager of
proper cementing of water sands.
Section 15 A (17): All wellheads, tank batteries, pumping
units and equipment... shall be adequately protected by a
fence...
Section 15 A (18): The premises shall be kept clean... free
rom rubbish o every character, at all times...
Section 15 A (21): Materials, equipment ...shall not be
delivered to or removed from the well site except between
the hours of 7 o'clock A.M. and 7:00 o•clock P.M. ...
- 3 -
These are just a few of the items of the ordinance which are
being ignored. We ask that the City provide a detailed review for
each permit application. We ask that operators be required to abide
by the ordinance on all points. This will require scene inspection by
the City.
We realize that Minx, Incorporated wishes to start drilling
operations immediately. It is important for the City Council to
realize that Minex had ample opportunity to review ordinance No. 671
before proceeding with this venture. We have been assured by the
Legal Department of the Ttxas Railroad Commission that:
1. City ordinances of this type supersede Timm Railroad
ocmmission Regulations.
2. That the State laws which have been cited to apply in
this case do not apply to a legal governmental agency
like a city. --Cities have a time honored right to -
control drilling operations within=e city
We respectfully request the City Council of Baytown to:
1. Enforce the existing City ordinance No. 671.
2. Revise ordinance No. 671 to include the specified
items before issuing any new drilling permits.
3. Deny any permit application for the drilling of new
wells or for the placement of tanks on city
property - more specifically - on city park
property or on property designated to be a city
park. -
The residents of Southwest Addition are proud of their
subdivision. They along with citizens of the West side of Baytown
have for years looked forward to the development of the Britton and
Bayland Park areas. We earnestly seek the support of the Mayor and of
the City Council in this matter.
Thank you.
- 4 -
a]
INDUSTRIAL ENGINE
BID: #8407 -82
DATE: AUGUST 7, 1984 2:00 P . M .
CITY OF BAYTOWN
'B I D TABULATION 1:
I
Attachment "C"
ITEM
QTY
UNIT
DESCRIPTION
V R NMENTAL SALES
IIYCO EQUIPMENT
PRECO MACHINERY
i
PRICE
EXT. PRICE
UNIT PRICE
EXT. PRICE
NO DID
UNIT PRICE
EXT. PRICE
NO BID
UNIT PRICE
EXT. PRICE
1
.�
1
each
INDUSTRIAL ENGINE, per
_UNIT
5 800.00
I
specifications.
�I
MODEL:
JD4276TF
I
DELIVERY:
30 Days
WARRANTY:
1 year.
1
'
SPECIAL CONDITIOPS:
Cannot tid
on a
Pcajj-,P
not
i
an OEM lor
jthey _are
John Deere.
Bids were mailed to'3 vendors.
I
DELIVERY
NET TOTAL
I
I
I
W
Q
u
a�
a,
a
D
m
H
.O
m
O
H
ra
W
O
w
A
3 co
O �
F �
r
p �I
L:+
C VI
r �
F C'
O
Ci <
w
� u
►- o r-
1- D
J
� H
O�
LU L t
O z t-
w
u
z
�X
+
J
w
H
w
z�
ya
C
F
W
H
w
V
...
G.
Ln
H�
u
ac
z
<w
Ca
V
y
IL,
wa
N
H
F
Hz
H�
U
w
U
rr
OC
0.
Ln
X
+
H
w
W
H
a
w
V
W
,ce
z
°-
H
�
LL)
U
b
Ln
z
N
f�
X
W
W
H
H
�w
_v
of
oa
<z
M
J
� H
O�
LU L t
O z t-
ANNUAL TIRE AND TUBE CONTRACT
I c,: #8407 -84
I� �i�.. AUGUST 20, 1984 2:00 P.M.
UNIT I DESCRIPTION
ANNUAL TIRE AND TUBE CONTRACT
per specifications.
195075R14WSW
225/70 R15
235 -70 R15
LT215/851116D
-k_! 30
1
225/75 R15
I $ 330.00
7 54
$31,54.50
670 X 15
$7,479.00
44.99
$2,249.50
700 X 14
57184.00
9 15
$1,793.88
700 X 15
I $ 289.44
11)
10 50_I
750 X 16 -
6 PLY
32
750 X 16 -
8 PLY
�11
_10
_13 I _2��
800 X 16.5
IIL -16SL
45.17
14 20
900 X 20
( $2,924.50
_151 60
1000 X 20
59.35 I
I6�_ 60
1100 X 20
$ 426.50
_ 17 ( 10
1300 X 24
55.87
$1,117.40
62.41
DE LIVERY
106.69
$2,133.80 (
MET TOTAL
$2,639.40 I
138.97
$8,338.20 I
C I TY OF SAYTO1.14
BID TABULATION*
FIRESTONE #0867 B. F. GOODRIC14
IT PRIG I EXT. PRICE I UNIT PRIG I EXT. PRICC
33.37
$ 333.70
* 33.00
I $ 330.00
42.06
$31,54.50
( * 9932
$7,479.00
44.99
$2,249.50
I *103.68
57184.00
60.76
486.08 j
69.65
$ 557.20
34.96
$ 349.60
40.94
$ 409.40
40.75
$1,222.50
44.90
$1,347.00
33.22
$1,793.88
I * 5.36
I $ 289.44
34.96
$ 139.84
40.94
$ 163.76
41.72
$ 625.80
i 46.48
I $ 697.20
45.17
$2,258.50
58.49
( $2,924.50
48.74
$1,559.68
59.35 I
$1,899.20
42.65
$ 426.50
51.71
$ 517.10
55.87
$1,117.40
62.41
$1,248.20
106.69
$2,133.80 (
131.97
$2,639.40 I
138.97
$8,338.20 I
156.70 I
$9,402.00 I
153.37
$9,202.20
167.30
$10,038.00
222.22
$2,222.20
261.76
$2,617.60 I
Atta.. went "E" .
CARR'S
UNIT P?1Cc
NO RESPONS
0
I A -Z TIRE & BATTERY
i
EXT. PR I CE !Lg,,: I T� PR 1 CE (EXT. PR 1 C
I NO RESP NSE
Attachment "D"
MEM ORAV DUM
T0: Fritz Lanham, City ?:onager
Dykes, City Engineer /Director of Public Works
SLiBJfiCT: Supply of Steel Sheet Piling_ - Brush Burner Repairs
Sob No. 8408 -02
Sealed bids were opened today for the supply of
make repairs to the damaged brush burner pit wall.
below:
steel sheet piling to
Bids are tabulated
Steel Piling, Inc. - $4,721.00 •
Skyline Steel Corp. -. 5,482.93
L.B. Foster Co. - 6,024.70
The piling offered by the low bidder, Steel Piling, Inc., did not meet
specifications in regard to flange thickness. Therefore, it is recoL..�ended
that the supply contract be a�. *arded to the next low bidder, Skyline Steel
Corp.,'•in the amount of $5,482.93.
Copy to
Asst City Mgr
City Clerk
Legal
RS /lc
I
ANNUAL TIRE AND TUBE CONTRACT
'►8407 -84
AUGUST 20, 1984 2:00 P.M.
C I TY OF L' AYM-34
5I D Tti3JL,T I Ci4
I
QTY
UNIT
I D= SCRIPTIal
GENERAL TIRE SERVICE KELLY TIRE SERVICE, INC.I
UNIT PRICE
_
EXT. PRICE UNIT PRICE I EXT. PRICE I UNIT PRICE
NO BID
I I
_
EXT. PRICE
(UNIT PRICE TEXT. PRICE.
]ANNUAL TIRE AND TUBE CONTRACT,
I l per specifications.
1 I 10
I 195075RI4WSW
NO BID
I
I
I
2 75 I 1 225/70 R15
NO BID
( I
_3 I 5 1235 -70 R15
NO BID
I
I
I
_4 � 8 (
LT215 /85R16D
63.75
$ 510.00
I
_ 5 I _10-1 Q014
_6_J_ 3Q 225/75 R15
32.24
$ 322.40
( I
I
I
40.77
$1,223.10
_.1 54 I
1 670 X 15
35.95
$1,941.30
I I
I
I
R 4 I 1 700 X 14
32.24
$ 128.96 I I
9 _15 1
700 X 15
43.40
$ 651.00 I (
I
I
750 X 16 - 6 PLY
11 32 750 X 16 - 8 PLY
43.16
48.01
$2,158.00 ( ( I I I
$1,536.32 I
I
12 ( ^_10 (- 800 X 16.5
13 � 20 I 111 -16SL
41.81
$ 418.10
$2,817.20 I I I
140.86
14 20
900 X 20
96'.59
$1,931.80 I I I
15�" b0 I 1 1000 X 20 _
115.21
$6,912.60
I I I I
16 60 ( ( 1100 X 20
134.43
$8,065.80 ( I I
17 10 1 1300 X 24
202.93
$2,031.30 I ( ( I
I
C E L I v ;Y
NET TGT.�,L
7 _ 1i.• 7
I I I I
I I 1
ANNUAL TIRE AND TUBE CONTRACT
AUGUST 20, 1984 2:00 P.M.
UNIT I DESCRIPTION
X13.6 -28R4
114.9 -24R4
17.51 -24R4
2-24114 _
16.9 -30R1
P155 X 8OR13
8 -14.5 LT
LT235 -85R16
1950 -16.5 LT
GRAND TOTAL:
DELIVERY:
EXEMPTIONS:
DOES NOT MEET SPEC:
CITY OF B.AYTO:•:14
-B 1 D TABULATION"
PAGE 2
;A -Z TIRE & BATTERY
EXT. PRICE KNIT PRICE IEXT. PRICE
DELIVERY I I I I I I
N- JOTAL 50,701.84 1 56,641.30
FIRESTONE
#0867
B. F. GOODRICH
CARR'S
PRICE
EXT. PRICE
U041T PRICE
EXT. PRICE
I L041 PRIC
165.03
$1,980.36
* 18.83
$ 225.96
166.62
$1,999.44-
171.22
( $2,054.64
236.47
$2,837.64
*216.64
$2,599.68
206.72
$2,480.64
189.03
$2,268.36
210.10
$2,521.20
( * 30.26
$ 363.12
31.71
$ 126.84
( 32.36
` $ 129.44
65.23
260.92
68.71
274.84
68.54
$ 411.24
79.07 $ 474.42
58.71
$ 469.68
( 63.84 $ 507.84
50701.84
$56,641.30
AS REQUIRED
1 -6 DAYS
ARO
* Item 7, 18,22
Tube only
* Item 20 lire
Only
I
*Item 1- 3.lThey
do not I
;A -Z TIRE & BATTERY
EXT. PRICE KNIT PRICE IEXT. PRICE
DELIVERY I I I I I I
N- JOTAL 50,701.84 1 56,641.30
1E
'rITLE.: ANNUAL STORAGE BATTERY CONTRACT
CID: # 8407 -86
DATE: AUGUST 20, 1984 2:00 P.M.
C I TY OF BAYM-34
•B I D TABUL AT I ON '
AM. meat "F"
I171.11,
QTY
UNIT
I
DESCRIPTION
RELIABLE BATTERY CO.
TED'S SUPPLY
I AUTO PARTS R. P. W. INC.
UNIT PRICE
EXT. PRICE
UNIT PRICE
EXT. PRICE
I U141 PRICE
_;
EXT. PRICE
Iu•41T PRICE
(EXT. PRICE
jANNUAL
STORAGE BATTERY CONTRACT,
per specifications.
I
I
I
1 1
1 24
each
IDelco Freedom, 8360
NO BID
i 59.10
$1,418.40
NO RESPONSE1
32.92
44.1'4
$ 790.08
$1,235.92
12
I 28
1 each
IDelco Freedom, 8960
( 69.10
$1,934.80
13
10
1 each
IMOPAR
1 69.95
I $ 699.50
46.17
$ 461.70
4
10
1 each
14D
151.15
$1,511.50
I
83.24
S 8
5
10
each
I 8D
182.17
I $1,821.70
(
101.00
1 $1,010-00 '
16
10
each
177
69.95
I $1,399.00
(
NO BID
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I I
I 1
WARRANTY:
24 Months
or better
I
on all batteries
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
(
I I
I
I
I
I i
I I
D= LIVERY
N-ET TOTAL
(
2 Days ARb I I I I
$8,784.90 I I
$4 330.1
I
iilt�: ANNUAL TIRE AND TUBE CONTRACT
93407-84
AUGUST 20, 1984 2 :0_0 p,14,
li i__3 I
QTY UN DE SCR IPTIO'd
_ ( I
I
18 I 12 I 113.6-28R4
19 12 114.9 -24R4
20 ( 12 117.51 -24R4
71 1 � -Z9R4
22 12 16.9 -30R1
23 4 1 I P155 X 80R13
24 1 4 1 18-14.5 LT
_
251 6 1 T LT235 -85R16
261 81 1950-16.5 LT
1 GRAND TOTAL
DELIVERY-
--------------
DELIVERY
K_ JOTIAL
.
CITY OF B.AYTO::1.4
'SID TABJL;,T 10+4
3 DAYS AR
47,262.14 I I
I I
T
PAGE 2
. PRICEIU`1T PRIC =I=_XT. PRICE
GENERAL TIRE SERVICE
KELLY TIRE SERVICE, INCI
U141 T Pm' I C=
CXT . PRICE
LX41 T PR I CE I EXT . PRICE 1
209.94
$2,519.28
236.45
$2,837.40
289.80
$3,477.60
251.08
$3,012.96
301.47
$3,617.64
26.53
$ 106.12
50.86
$ 203.44
66.61
$ 399.66
55.02
$ 440.16
$47.262.14
3 DAYS AR
47,262.14 I I
I I
T
PAGE 2
. PRICEIU`1T PRIC =I=_XT. PRICE
TLE: ANNUAL FILL SAND CONTRACT
ID: #8407 -89
D: -TE : AUGUST 16, 1984 2:00 P . M .
CITY OF BAYTOWN
BID TABULATION
Attacnment "G"
ITCM
QTY
UNIT
DESCRIPTION
BAYTOWN SAND & CLAY
RIGHT -WAY SAND
ANAHUAC TONING
i M. A. C. TRUCKING
UNIT PRICE
EXT. PRICE
UNIT PRICE
EXT. PRICE
U141T PRICE
EXT. PRICE
JUNIT PRICE
EXT. PRICE
5,00
yds
ANNUAL FILL SAND, per
3.50
$17,500.00
3.50
$17,500.00
4,85
$24,250.00
3.70
$18,500.00
s ecifications.
MODEL
DELIVERY:
1/2 Day ARC
As ordered A
0
Same Day A
2 Days AR
I
1
DELIVERY
NET TOTAL
i
' I
I
I
CITY C- PAYTO:•:1J
'51 D TAS'JL-,T I Oil
17LE: ANNUAL STORAGE BATTERY CONTRACT
ID: N 8407 -86
AUGUST 20, 1984 2 : 00 P.M.
PAGE 2
mqm
QTY
I UNIT
DESCRIPTION
,
BAYTOWN OIL SALES
MAYSON AUTO PARTS
DAVID'S AUTO PARTS PARTS SUPPLY
'UNIT PitIC_°
=XT. PRICE
UNIT PRICE I EXT. PRICE I U141T PRICE I EXT. P ?ICE
ILINIT PRICE
TEXT. PRICE
I
I
-----]ANNUAL
I
STORAGE BATTERY CONTRACT,
NO RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
I
NO RESPONSE
NO RESPONS
1per specifications.
1
24 ( each
IDelco Freedom, 8360
2
28 I each
(Delco Freedom, 8960
3
10-1
each
i MOPAR
4-
1 10 each
14D
5 1 10 each 8D
I
6 ( 10
each 77
(
I
WARRANTY:
(
I I
I
I
DELIVERY
I• TOTAL
I
I
C I TY OF BAYTOI-14
'BID TABULATION"
f11t�: ANNUAL DATA PROCESSING PAPER CONTRACT
I r�: #8407 -85
A..TE: AUGUST 16, 1984 2:00 P.M.
IL
Attachment "H"
n
`I.1'�'� QT1'
I UNIT
DESCRIPTICNJ
TRINITY FORMS
MOORE BUSINESS FORMS I CURTIS 1000_ !DOYLE BUSINESS FORMS
PRICE
EXT. PRICE
U41T PRICE
EXT. PRICE I UIJIT PRICE
EXT. PR1Cr
IUNIT PRICE
TEXT. PRICE
JI
ANNUAL DATA PROCESSING PAPER,
_UNIT
per specifications.
I I
10.68
$2,670.00
1 11.65 $2,912.50 11.93
$2,982.50
NO RESPONSE
1
250
M
1 1 -Part, Standard 14 -7/8" X lilt
—2
•
1) 100
I
25
M 2 -Part, Standard 14 -7/8" X 11"
M I 4 -Part, Standard 14 -7/8" X lI"
22.06
44.97
$2,206.00
$1,124.25
I 24.88 1$2,488.00 25.18
I
57.16 1$1,429.00 ( 53.15
$2,518.00
$1,328.75
4
j 651
M
1 -Part, White 9 -1/2" X 11"
7.56
$ .491.40
9.25 ($ 601.25
1 8.37
1 $ 544.05
I
I
I
1
I
PRICE INCREASES:
Prices guaranteed
for 3 1
They will r6ise
prices
I
months anU_v1II
xe- w-ewed -e3r-
be
ry-3-aye, I
I
during the
Fon rac .
I
I
I
1
D:LIVERY
NET TOTAL
3 Days ARO
1
2 -3 Days ARI
( 10 Days I 1
$743075
$7,430.75 I $7,173A
$6,491.
1
CITY OF 13AYTO'e.TI
BID TABULATION
TLE: ANNUAL FILL SAND CONTRACT
BID: #8407 -89
DATE : AUGUST 16, 1984 2:00 P . M .
PAGE 2
ITEM
QTY
UNIT
DESCRIPTION
COASTAL CEMENT
UNIT PRICE
EXT. PRICE
UNIT PRICE
EXT. PRICi=
UNIT PRICE
EXT. PRICE
UNIT PRICE
JEXT. PRICE
1
5,000
yds
ANNUAL FILL SAND CONTRACT,
6.50
$32,500.00
per specifications
MODEL:
DELIVERY:
jI
ALTERNATE:
4.85
$24,250.00
Pliospno-
Gypsum
1
i�1
1
1
DELIVERY
N' TOTAL
I
I
11
TITLE: 3" TRASH PUMP
CID: #8407 -78
DATE: AUGUST 16, 1984 2:00 P.M.
C I TY OF BAYTO:NJ
.BID TABULATION'
Attacfunent "I"
IT` �
QTY
UNIT
DESCRIPTION
BAYTOWN AIR COOLED
NAYLOR
I WACKER CORPORACTION
;CORR -TECH
U141T PRICE
EXT. PRICE
U141T PRICE
EXT. PRICE
I U141T PRICE
I EXT. PRICE
(UNIT PRICE
TEXT. PRICE
1
4
each
3" TRASH PUMP, per
1,149.48
$4,597.92
NO BID
1 949.97
$3,799.88
NO RESPOISE
Ispecifications.
I
I
I
MODEL:
HONDA WT-30
I
HONDA PT 3
DEL I VERY:
2 Weeks or
less
I
2 Days ARO
WARRANTY:
6 Months
(
I
6 Months
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DE LIVERY
NET TOTAL
T = ?..v
(
I
I
I
C) TY C: B.AYTUNN
=JD TA3JL -4T I ON I
ANNUAL DATA PROCESSING PAPER CONTRACT
`8407 -85
AUGUST 16, 1984 2:00 P.M.
PAGE 2
r
CITY
UNI__T*
j DESCRIPTION
-
IBOWATER COMPUTER FORMS-
THE REIN COMPANY IXEROX CORPORATION ;
U1d1T PRIC=
EXT. PRICE
U41T PRICE I EXT. PRICE I U41T PRICE EXT. PPICE.
I
IUP:IT PRICE
TEXT. PRIC_
I�
ANNUAL DATA PROCESSING PAPER,
I
1 per specifications.
I
I
I
I I
I I I I '
1 _I
iiI
250
I M
1 -Part, Standard 14 -7/8" X 11"
9,42
$2,355.00
I 8.09 1$2,245.00-
1 55.00
1 $13,750.00
I I
+2
1 100
M
1 2 -Part, Standard 14 -7/8" X 11"
21.12
$2,112.00
1 19.90 1$1,990.00 1 62.35 1 $ 6,235.00
1
1
' II_
I
I I
_3
I 251 M
4 -Part, Standard 14 -7/8" X 11"
44.63
$1,115.75 1 44.42
1$1,110.50 1 71.45 1 $ 1,786.25
1
4 I 651 M 1
1 -Part, White 9 -1/2" X 11"
6.16
$.400.40
1 6.57 ($ 427.05 1 37.10
1$ 2,411.50 1
r 1
PRICE INCREASES:
Prices firm
for 6 months)
Prices guaranteed until 1 Prices varylaccording
1
1
from Aug.
6, 1984.
December 19P4.
1
to quantitylordered.
I
C= LitERY
14 Days AR
13 Days ARO 1
1 2 -5 Days ARb 1 I
$5,772.55 l , 24,182.751
$5,983.15 ( (
y
LU
C3
d
a
o6
r-
ca
1v in
S
r n
u In
111
u
n:
CL
x
hi
to
u
re
0.
r
lu
U
(L'
d
h
Y
W
lu
u,
a.
r
S
lu
U_
K
a
r
x
U
Lu
u
a
CL
oe�
� f
n: r�-
u1 �
III III 1
T
lu
u
ct
w
'
h
J
X
W
I
z
x
W
o
11 I
lNy,
f-
�
u
K
�
a
3
°•
Z
W
oe�
� f
n: r�-
u1 �
III III 1
T
a
S.
••
W
a�
>-
o
a
a
o
w
E
w
N
Y
W
d
W
o
d
Q
Z
V1
Z
3
O
o
W
�
W
a.
m
V
lL
►-�
•r
WN
4-
U
=
•r-•
In
W
u
co
U1
9
d
Z
�
co
d'
N
—
—
3
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
W
-j
D
to
N 1
w
o
�
-
--
- c
U)
-
--
—
—
-
tY
G
a
J
tLi
li]
oe�
� f
n: r�-
u1 �
III III 1
V
w
c�
a
O 8
F•
o� 1
lU .i
� n
u �n
U.l
F
d
G
t�
N
uj
d
u
G
co
z
00
LLJ
J
fy
•.•
co
f�
N
�--•
co
N
I
r
W
O
>.
C7
ILJ
CO
C
U
I_C�
U.l
u
fy
a
LL
w
I-
N
Z
O
I�zu
fu
w
-,
K
O
Z
wa
z
3
1u
—
LU
'�'
a
LL
Nr
oii
X
N
Z
Lu
O
W
L1
.•
W
�--�
u-
lu
¢
-
O
¢
(L
z
r
mj
lu
u_
z
K a
W
1-
In
o
2:
x
U
L
N
W
IIJ
U.
V
CD
Z
W
�-
=r
J
^
m
lu
_u
K
a
N
ce.�
O
X
W
W
W
N
z
z
�
a
W
UI
U
N
W
Y.-.
�
a
O
m
z
r
3
N
Q
W
CD
J
Y
C'
III Ui
0 I-
0
Z
r•+
Nf
C
�
O
3
O
W
4J
1.
J
ro
u
U
=
CA
W
y
U
LU
O
oWC
an
1-
U
u
R7
C1
ch
H-
O'
TILL`_: REVERSIBLE WINDBREAKER
EID: #8407 -87
DATE: AUGUST 21, 1984 2 :00 P . M .
C I TY OF BAYTOl.-JN
•B 1 D TAoUL„T I ON
Atti.-Iment "J'.'
(IT�4
QTY
UNIT
I DESCRIPTION
MARTIN'S UNIFORMS
J. B. BATTLE UNIFORM FACTORY SALES ; BILL STORY FIRE
U141T PRICE
EXT. PRICE
UNIT PRICE
42.95
EXT. PRICE I UIJIT PRICE
$4,166.15 51.55
I EXT. PRICE
$5,000.35
lUN'IT PRICE
NO RESPONSE
(EXT. PRICE
each
REVERSIBLE WINDBREAKER, per
54.95
$5330.15
specifications.
I
I
I
DELIVERY:
60 Days
30 -45 Days
4 Weeks
I MAKE /MODEL:
Blauer /345
I Blauer /3
5
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
ii
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I I
I
I I
RiAs w
I
I
I
I
3 responded.
!
I
1!
I
I
1
I
I
I
DE LIVERY
NET TOTAL
I
(
I
I
I
$5,330.15 (
I
$4,166.15 I ( $5,000.35 I
W
f'
Q
a
H
C� J
D
10 Q
}
u m
E
2 co
N I�
4L•' 1� N
1— O
ct C7
i•'f a Q
J
ILJ
u_
rt
a
x
w
cn
w
u
N
o
—
d
K
a
N
w
L
C
�
o
Z
u
—
—
—
—
—�
a
a
x
w
C,
LLJ
3
W
- -_—
CL
u z
Ln
ca
CL
R0
a
=
w
a.
�
o
z
u
a
a
.x
o
aU
U
2
O
Q
J
V
–
LLJ
S
C
C-
HL"
N
LLJ
1-
z
IL
V
K
a
z
U.;
f
x
w
w
N
a
Cr
W
IU
-2
CL
N
W
3
a
F-
Z
�1
J
W
O
w
>
J
ILI
J
d H
N
G.
Ifs
7
a
d
Lm
•�
4-
0
u
~
-
cu
0
N9
N
F-
a
Fl
—.—
—
—
�—
'--
�— ._.��
—•—
-
1
-III
CITY C: eAYM-14
PAGE 2
'BID 7ASULA I ON
PICNIC CATERING SERVICE
FAD: #8408 -94
h-*.TE: AUGUST 21, 1984 2:00 P.M.
I1T "I
QTY
UNIT
�ESCR1PTlOrl
BUD'S BARBCUE BIG JOHN'S BBQ I CATERING BY LYNETTE ! KAY'S CATERING
UI•:IT PRICE
_ _
EXT. PRICE UNIT PRIG EXT. PRICE I U41T PRICE
NO RESPONSE 4.75 /PLATE 1$6,500.00 1 5.00 /plate
EXT. PRICE
1 $5,000.00
IUP.l1T PRICE
112.00/;plate
(EXT. PRICE
$12,000.00
I 1
I 1
I lot
PICNIC CATERING SERVICES,
per specifications.
l (
Un�
TOTAL:
I
9.00 /platel$
9,000.00
I SPECIAL CONDITION:
2 1 lot ( ALTERNATE: per specifications.
NO RESPONSE
I $3,620.00 (
NO BID
$6,250.00
I- I
C =! I V5RY
1`: =T TOTAL
I I I
I I
I l I I
CITY OF BAYTU•.'N
"BID TABULATION
iLE
PICNIC CATERING SERVICE
D: #8408 -94
)ATE: AUGUST 21, 1984 2 : 00 P. 14.
Attachment "K"
QTY
UNIT
DESCRIPTION
JUNCTION
GABBY'S BBQ
TOM PIERCE BAR -B -Q ; DEMERIX BARBECUE
UNIT
UNIT PRICE
EXT. PRICE
UNIT PRICE
I EXT. PRICE
I UNIT PRICE
EXT. PRICE
IUNIT PRICE
IEXT. PRICE
1
1
lot
PICNIC CATERING SERVICES,
NO BID
3.50 / plate
$4,550.00
6.25 /plate
$6,250.00
3.50 /plate
$3,500.00
per specifications.
I
I
I
I
TOTAL:
I $4,500.00
$6,250.00
$3 500.00
SPECIAL CONDITION:
I *1 oz. short
of potato
I
*Offer 1/3
lbs. of
I
�4pec i f i ed
I
I
1
lot
ALTERNATE: per specifications.
NO BID
( $4,792.50
I
$5,205.00
NO BID
I1
I
I
I
I
(
- LTERNATE:
1 $4,312.50
(ALTERNATE:
1 $4,250.00
I
I I
S. o
pae
I
}50klbs. of links,
I
I
gal. o I
i�
I
I I
I
I
' DELIVERY
TAL
_•,••-
I
I
I I I
(
I
R
1-•
i�
Lsi
11•
C.)
F-
A
U.)
r'
a
F-
J
m
a
cn
w
U
W
Ln
c�
a
z
a
�-
c
rr
.-
Lt,
F-
u
c
c�
U
�
H
CC)
v
Z
O
=
u
c
c:
yl
J
I_ C
u
ry
a
x
w
_
_u
K
a
'
-
-
--
lu
—
-
-
--
V
a
a
x
w
w
--
u
R
a
7
ILJ
0
0
0
K
o
0
0
o
O
N
y_
Ln
CO
In
"
."
ci
Zw
x
"
cr)
w
en
w
C%j
U-1
lu
u
�
ra
U
Q
r-
J
a
o
=s
ILI
u
F-
K
a
x
}.
W
C
u,
o
LL
un
�a
z�
`a
�I
N
C
Z
O
•r
o
l..i
V
F-
4-
U
(I.)
I> ►�-
L1J
N
cl
p
C7
•r
r-,
L
Ll - I-
Z
+�
U
t1J
L^1
rp
u
W
c
d
Ow
F-
a
U
Ln
Z
u
L
W
F-
0
+-)
0
0
i
I
NI-
i-
I--
i-
i-
►
-�
-�-
i--
f l
•--
I
I-
W
W
(.9
Q
C-
.H
c3 J
7
IGU Q
r
u }4
c
a
1
W
U
C
W
N
z
W
1--
C
u C
u �
q
z a
c
CC)
G
I1J
u
rY
a
W
X
� w
ru -
v ED
i K N
a W
X
C> 1_ a
j Z
' I u —
u
a
W
Y
Cc: x
C W
1 u CW
i u O
In aC. •
N
3
V
O o
K p p 0
°- 0 6
O C> ri
r\ r\
w
W x M M
b4 tr4 M
LU
co JU
u ;;
C u ro
n c n
ac 0• *�,
z r o
w
K •
0.
1-
ca x
Z LI Lij
Lv
W Z
F- III O
C u n.
U N
K W
J a
cc I- O
J w• Z
N
C
O
Z•�-
w . O
w C u J
4-
C ~ U ri IiI
W N 06
Ln C Q N u1 lil 1�
Z 4J U OJ
r•.w f0 W d
u n.
H v
I- Q •r W
CL U d C
LA u i. I-
to a a
j O O
� r r
C),
h- I —1-1— — i�n-
00
rn
N
H
N
C
UI
J •
•• U
UJ
G
I1J
u
rY
a
W
X
� w
ru -
v ED
i K N
a W
X
C> 1_ a
j Z
' I u —
u
a
W
Y
Cc: x
C W
1 u CW
i u O
In aC. •
N
3
V
O o
K p p 0
°- 0 6
O C> ri
r\ r\
w
W x M M
b4 tr4 M
LU
co JU
u ;;
C u ro
n c n
ac 0• *�,
z r o
w
K •
0.
1-
ca x
Z LI Lij
Lv
W Z
F- III O
C u n.
U N
K W
J a
cc I- O
J w• Z
N
C
O
Z•�-
w . O
w C u J
4-
C ~ U ri IiI
W N 06
Ln C Q N u1 lil 1�
Z 4J U OJ
r•.w f0 W d
u n.
H v
I- Q •r W
CL U d C
LA u i. I-
to a a
j O O
� r r
C),
h- I —1-1— — i�n-
40823 -1
MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE SESSION
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN
August 23, 1984
The City Council of the City of Baytown, Texas, met in
executive session on Thursday, August 23, 1984, at 6:00 p.m.
in the Conference Room of the Baytown City Hall with the
following attendance:
Fred T. Philips
Jimmy Johnson
Perry M. Simmons
Ron Embry
Roy L. Fuller
Gerald Dickens
Allen Cannon
Fritz Lanham
Larry Patterson
Ron McLemore
Eileen P. Hall
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Mayor
City Manager
Assistant City Manager
Assistant City Attorney
City Clerk
The meeting was called to order with a quorum present,
and Mayor Cannon recessed the open meeting into executive
session to discuss pending litigation.
When the open meeting reconvened, Mayor Cannon announced
that there was no busiess to be transacted.
Adjourn
Since there was no further business to be transacted,
the meeting was adjourned.
Eileen P. Hall, City Clerk