1983 07 14 CC Minutes30714 -1
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN
July 14, 1983
The City Council of the City of Baytown, Texas, met in
regular session on Thursday, July 14, 1983, at 6:30 p.m. in
the Council Chamber of the Baytown City Hall with the fol-
lowing attendance:
Fred T. Philips
Jimmy Johnson
Perry M. Simmons
Mary E. Wilbanks
Roy L. Fuller
Gerald Dickens
Allen Cannon
Fritz Lanham
Larry Patterson
Randy Strong
Eileen P. Hall
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilwoman -- Absent
Councilman
Councilman
Mayor
City Manager -- Absent
Assistant City Manager
City Attorney
City Clerk
The meeting was called to order with a quorum present.
After the invocation was offered, the following business
was transacted:
Consider Minutes for the Regular Meeting Held June 23, 1983
Councilman Johnson moved for approval of the minutes
for the meeting held June 23, 1983; Councilman Philips
seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons,
Fuller and Dickens
Mayor Cannon
Nays: None
Receive Petitions
No petitions were presented.
City Manager's Report
Angel's Construction and Harris County have asked the
City if it would be permissible to close North Main from
Baker Road to Crosby Cedar -Bayou Lynchburg to expedite the
construction of North Main for a period of approximately
six weeks. They will be working primarily on the west two
lanes. They feel that by doing this they can put some addi-
tional crews on the job, speed the work up and get that portion
of the job finished before school starts. This section would
be closed to through traffic but other traffic would be
routed around the equipment. Council inquired of the City
Attorney, Randy Strong, if this was legal. Council was
assured by the City Attorney that because this is only to
be a temporary closing that it is legal. Council expressed
30714 -2
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 14, 1983
concern because of inconvenience to residents in that area,
plus mail vehicles, and especially emergency vehicles.
Assistant City Manager, Larry Patterson reported that arrange-
ments would be made to facilitate emergency vehicles.
Council agreed that the contractor was facing some
problems with this work because of the traffic but suggested
some alternate solutions, such as closing the street one day at
a time, or keeping only one lane open.
Councilman Simmons expressed concern for the small businesses
in that area and how the closing of this section would affect
them.
After discussion of the closing of this section, Mayor
Cannon suggested that Council ask the Administration to go
back to the Contractor and the County and see if they could
arrive at a better solution to the problem.
Fischer -Hill Sanitary Sewer - Construction has begun on
a 6 inch sanitary sewer main. The project is 35% complete at
this time.
Quail Hollow -Baker Road Lift Station Modifications - There
is some delay due to the bad weather and due.to the shipment
of some of the parts needed to complete this project. A
thirty day extension has been granted which brings the completion
date to August 5.
1983 Street Extension Project - Bids are due in on July
28, on this project and will be presented to you at the
following council meetings.
Water lines on Barkaloo, Cedar Bayou- Crosby, and Hardin
Road - Bids will be received on August 2, along with the
Sanitary Sewer on Rollingbrook Drive.
July 4th Celebration at Bicentennial Park - This was
the largest and most successful one that we have had. Bobby
Rountree and his staff were complimented for a tremendous job.
Questions /Comments of Council
Councilman Philips brought up that he had been contacted
on different occasions concerning what is considered to be
a serious traffic hazard at Loop 201 and West Texas Avenue.
He referred to a recent auto accident at that intersection
in which a young woman had been killed. He feels that the
problem is that the people coming off of Loop 201, coming
down to Decker Drive have not reduced their speed as they
approach the intersection. People entering the intersection
on Texas Avenue just don't see the cars approaching from
the Loop, and get trapped in the wide street. Councilman
Philips asked that the Administration get with the highway
department to see if there can be a solution to this problem.
30714 -3
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 14, 1983
Consider Proposed Ordinance, Changing the Name of Martin
Luther King Street to Oak Street
Council had asked at the last Council meeting that this
item be placed on the agenda for the next meeting so that a
decision could be reached.
Three petitions have been received in regard to this
street naming. The first petition in 1981, asked that the
portion from Riggs Street to Gentry be named Martin Luther
King. That action was taken. A second petition asked that
that same portion be changed back to Oak Street. The third
petition asked that the name of the street be left as it is.
Council was presented with a copy of all three petitions.
Councilman Simmons stated that when the first petition
was presented to Council, Council acted in good faith in
complying with the request at considerable cost and incon-
venience to taxpayers and citizens. He indicated that
because of his familiarity with this area through his past
business, that he is well acquainted with a lot of these
residents, and does not feel that there is a real groundswell
to change the name of the street back to Oak Street.
Councilman Simmons went on to state that in view of this
fact, and the fact that it would again cost the taxpayers
and citizens money, that no action be taken.
Councilman Fuller stated that he did not feel comfortable
with the way the petitions were presented and questioned
the validity of the petitions. For this reason he felt that
it should be left the way it was.
Councilman Johnson stated that in talking with Mr. Paul
Jones who presented the second petition, that Mr. Jones was
adamant that the neighborhood council was not contacted on
the first petition. Councilman Johnson stated that Mr. Jones
had led him to believe that everyone wanted the name changed
back because the street was not suitable to honor this
distinguished American.
At this point, Councilman Johnson made a motion that
Martin Luther King Street be changed back to Oak Street;
Councilman Philips seconded the motion.
Councilman Philips stated that he was persuaded by what
had been presented to Council and by the !number of names
on the petitions. He recognized some of the',names as bonafide
residents and felt that the majority of the people were asking
for this change; therefore, Council would be responding to
the wants of the citizens to make the change.
Mayor Cannon stated that in reviewing the petition, he
did see some discrepancies, and he felt that Mr. Jones does
not represent the majority of the people in Oak Addition.
Mayor Cannon stated that the Police Chief and his staff could
take care of some of the problems that are going on in this
neighborhood that are behind the feeling that the street is
not befitting to Martin Luther King.
Vera Bowen, a resident of Oak Street, stated that the
street was the same when the petition was originated and the
name was changed to Martin Luther King. She suggested that
they clean up the street instead of change the name.
30714 -4
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 14, 1983
The vote follows:
Nays: Council members Simmons, Fuller, Dickens
Mayor Cannon
Ayes: Councilman Johnson and Philips
Consider Appeal of E. C. Porter from the Decision of the
Chief Building Inspector Regarding Buffer Fencing
E. C. Porter appeared before Council to ask that he be
allowed to have his new business on the same location of his
old business and not have to build a buffer fence between
his business and the residence of Mrs. M. B. Carter, his
neighbor. Mrs. Carter has also provided a letter stating
that she has no problem with this type of arrangment.
Councilman Johnson made a motion that this variance be
granted and Mr. Porter be allowed to put his building there
without a fence. Councilman Philips seconded the motion.
The vote follows:
Ayes: Council members Johnson, Philips, Simmons,
Fuller and Dickens
Mayor Cannon
Nays: None
Dale Calcarone Will Appear
Dale Calcarone appeared before Council to question the
ordinances requiring that licensed contractors perform the
electrical and plumbing work on business establishments.
His argument was that if a person can perfommi repair work
in these areas on his residence, why wouldn't a person be
allowed to perform that same work on his own business?
Mr. Calcarone felt that he should be allowed to perform
this work since he owned the business and would have the
work inspected by the proper building inspectors.
In response to an inquiry from Council, Randy Strong,
City Attorney, explained that the ordinances involved do
not provide that an individual may perform work on a business
establishment that he owns without being properly licensed
to do so, and the ordinances would have to be amended to
make that provision. Variances cannot be granted.
Councilman Philips felt that the difference between a
private residence and a business establishment is that the
health, safety, and general welfare of the public is involved.
He also pointed out that the Inspection Department is probably
not manned to supervise every move made by an unlicensed
individual.
Mayor Cannon indicated that he was receptive to what
Mr. Calcarone was saying because he felt that Council should
encourage the refurbishing of Texas Avenue, but he realized
that there is a safety factor involved. Therefore, Mayor
Cannon asked if Council desired to hold a work session.
30714 -5
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 14, 1983
Councilman Johnson moved to schedule a work session
for August 11, 1983 at 5:00 p.m.; Councilman Dickens seconded
the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Council members Johnson, Fuller and Dickens
Mayor Cannon
Nays: Council members Philips and Simmons
Discuss Noise Control Ordinance
Council was provided with a copy of the existing Noise
Control Ordinance, a copy of proposed ordinance alternates
1 and 2, a model ordinance from the EPA, as well as sound
levels established by other jurisdictions.
City Attorney, Randy Strong, discussed in detail the
different approaches to noise ordinances and provided some
guidelines to consider. He also gave some examples of decibel
levels of certain situations.
Councilman Fuller stated that Council had decided the
necessity for a noise control ordinance because of the
situation in Graywood. However, Council needed to recognize
that because of industry and other factors, Baytown may not
be the simple standard situation when it comes to noise control,
and a very in depth study should be made before restraints
are put on industry and other commercial establishments.
Other Council members concurred and expressed the feeling that
perhaps a public hearing would be beneficial to derive input
from various segments of the community.
Mayor Cannon recognized Leonard Stasney, representative
of Exxon, who stated that Exxon feels that it is right and
proper for Council to address the health, safety and welfare
of its citizens. However, Baytown is a unique city and
perhaps the same standards should not apply throughout the
city. For instance, should the ordinance specify different
levels for different periods throughout the day? There is
a lot of ambiant noise in the daytime that is not prevalent
at night. Should the absolute pressure level (dba level)
be established as an average of day and night sounds? Should
the ordinance include a provision for the correction of the
characteristic of the sound, that is, is it a pure tone or
a pulsating tone? What should the time limit for a violation
be? The ordinance is silent in a number of areas. In the
area of enforcement the ordinance is silent on testing.
What kind of equipment, procedures, standards, etc. are
necessary? In the area of exemptions, there are certain
emergency situations where noises are increased. At Exxon,
for example, under normal conditions the pumps and compressors
are driven by electric motors which are relatively quiet,
but if power is lost, then the operation is switched to
steam turbine drivers which are quite a bit noiser. This
is a temporary situation and provision for temporary situa-
tions should be included in the ordinance. Probably some
terminology in the draft ordinance could be improved, for
example the words pressure safety relief valve could be
better described as a pressure relief system because at
Exxon there are a number of pressure valves which'go into a
flare system which in itself is a Safety valve or safety system.
30714 -6
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 14, 1983
The bottom line is that the company feels this to be an
extremely technical subject and one, if it is to be applied,
should be applied in a manner to accomplish the intent of
what Council wants to accomplish without any adverse long
range impact on the community. Mr. Stasney offered Exxon's
expertise in whatever area Council would desire to help
develop an ordinance that would be satisfactory to specific
areas in Baytown to address the specific kinds of problems
that Baytown has and the specific conditions existing in
Baytown.
Council agreed that they were not prepared to make any
decision on this draft at this time, and that any help that
Exxon, U. S. Steel or other industries with more expertise
in this field could provide would be greatly appreciated.
Mayor Cannon pointed out that this issue had come before
Council several times in the past and the time has now come
to come up with a definite and workable ordinance concerning
noise control.
Council agreed that Mayor Cannon should appoint a task
force made up of Council members, as well as representatives
of small business, homeowners, and industry.
Delapidated Buildings
In response to an inquiry from Councilman Johnson
regarding the inspection of occupied residences for health
or structural reasons, Larry Patterson, Assistant City
Manager, explained that the City of Baytown has very broad
powers with regard to health, safety and welfare of its citizens
and that any time a health violation is reported that possible
problem is inspected and proper action is taken by the city
to rectify the situation.
Leonary Stasney, Chairman of the Baytown Clean City
Commission, mentioned that there are a number of areas in
the city where the homes are in a run down state, and you
will find in a number of these cases materials strawn around
the home which causes vermin and insect infestation.
Jean Shepherd, a member of the Community Development
Advisory Board, stated that in other cities persons with
homes in a delapidated state are given notice to bring those
homes up to standard.
Mayor Cannon suggested that the Administration should
be more agressive with regard to establishment and enforcement
of standards to cause individuals to repair delapidated
structures and cleanup around such structures whether those
structures are occupied or not.
30714 -7
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 14, 1983
Consider Proposed Ordinance, Abandoning and Vacating
Overhead Easement Between 3500 and 3502 Savell Drive,
Section One, Whispering Pines Subdivision
Mr. Ervin H. Boessling has requested that an overhead
easement between 3500 and 3502 Savell Drive, Section One, of
Whispering Pines Subdivision be vacated and abandoned. Mr.
Boessling owns the two pieces of property in question and
would like this abandonment so that he can better utilize
these properties. All utility companies have been contacted
and have no objections to this abandonment. There are no
underground easements in this section. The Administration
recommended approval of the ordinance.
Councilman Philips moved for adoption of the ordinance;
Councilman Johnson seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons,
Fuller and Dickens
Mayor Cannon
Nays: None
ORDINANCE NO. 3652
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN,
PROVIDING THAT A PORTION OF AN OVERHEAD UTILITY EASEMENT BE
VACATED, ABANDONED AND CLOSED; PROVIDING FOR THE QUITCLAIMING
OF THE CITY'S INTEREST IN SAID PROPERTY; AND PROVIDING FOR
THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF.
Consider Proposed Resolution No. 842, Expressing Council's
Support for the Harris County Toll Road Election
The proposed resolution would express Council's support
for the Harris County Toll Road Election for the Hardy Road
Toll Road Project. Council had been furnished with a copy
of a letter from County Judge Jon Lindsay urging Council's
support of the project, along with a copy of a letter from
Beverly Heinrich, President of Harris County Mayors' and
Councils' Association.
Councilman Simmons commented that the two things that
have brought this to a climax were the legislature's failure
to allocate necessary funds for the highway department, and
the MTA's failure in its referendum to provide heavy rail
service. Therefore, the matter of congestion and lack of
mobility in Houston chiefly and in the county primarily has
brought this so greatly into focus, that Judge Lindsay with
Commissioner's Court backing has entertained this program
whereby a $900,000,000 authorization, guaranteed bond
referendum would be considered by the voters. The climate
is such that a lot of people who are disenchanted with the
MTA do not desire to pay any more sales taxes and most people
do not want to pay any more ad valorem taxes. Therefore, in
order to finance the highways to relieve the congestion, a
toll road seemed to be the best solution. The Hardy Street
Toll Road is a project that the Texas Turnpike Authority has
been studying for some time. It came out of preliminary
report in January indicating that the project would be
30714 -8
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 22, 1983
economical and fiscally feasible. Further compatibility
studies were made with the MTA to ascertain if the MTA might
participate in the right of way with the heavy rail system
and that came back favorably. Judge Lindsay feels that the
county can do a much better, more economical job of construction
on!the Hardy Street Toll Road Project than the TTA. The
county has a AAA bond rating while the Texas Turnpike Authority
would have either a BAA or BBB rating on the type bonds they
would have to sell which would be net revenue bonds. With
the county guaranteeing the revenue bonds with its AAA
rating, the county could get a much better interest savings --
14% or lh %. The legislature recently authorized the county
to enable them to sell gross revenue bonds with the net
revenue bonds that the TTA has, maintenance and operation
expenses are paid off the top and the remainder is applied
toward paying off toll bonds. In gross revenue bonds, like
the county could sell, all the proceeds from the toll revenues
may be applied to the retirement of the debt. Maintenance
and operation would be paid out of the road and bridge fund.
The benefit to the people of Baytown for this toll road is
that some of the traffic congestion will be taken off I -45
and Highway 59. It would also take alot of the truck traffic
to the Port of Houston and the eastern part of the county.
The feasibility study has shown that the Hardy Street Toll
Road will be very heavily traveled and a money making road.
By pooling that with the other projects which the county
hopes to accomplish on Beltway 81 the hope is that the Hardy
Street Toll Road will produce the necessary revenue to cover
other areas that aren't doing as well. The whole point is
that the county can do this project much cheaper than the
TTA. The Hardy Street Toll Road Project would be a $384,000,000
project. The county would only have to sell a portion of
the bonds to complete the project, while the TTA would have
to sell a $465,000,000 bond issue because they are required
to put up a 1.2 to 1 ratio as a contingency. Their interest
rate in order to make the project feasible would have to be
in the neighborhood of 9.32% and the county's financial
advisors advise that presently the rate is about 10.6% for
that type bond. By the savings the county could make on
Hardy Street, more funds would be available for providing
other thoroughfares in Harris County. Another interest to
Baytown would be the bridge south of the tunnel. It seems
that the highway department representatives are saying that
if that bridge is ever constructed, in all probability it
will be a toll bridge. The County Commissioners Court feels
that a program can be put together that will give the most
for the citizens money whereby the users will pay the fees.
A number of people are concerned about the $9,000,000
authorization. These are guaranteed bonds. It is not
anticipated that the revenues are going to be sufficient to
pay the interest and carrying on the toll facilities, but if
the revenues are insufficient, that would entail a tax
increase. The difference between the Texas Turnpike Authority
and Harris County is that the bond holders would be responsible
for a TTA default, but in the event that the county had to
default, the county would have to increase taxes to pay the
indebtedness.
30714 -9
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 14, 1983
Mayor Cannon stated that he would have to relate
this issue to the high rise bridge where the traffic has
not met expectations. However, he felt the approach
problems to the bridge has had a negative impact and
traffic will improve. The increased traffic in the area
of Farm Road 1960, I -45 and Highway 59 area is evident
support of this proposal, may free up funds for other
areas and may influence the construction of the channel
bridge.
Councilman Philips moved for adoption of the resolution;
Councilman Fuller seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons,
Fuller and Dickens
Mayor Cannon
Nays: None
RESOLUTION NO. 842
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN
SUPPORTING THE NINE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLAR REVENUE BOND
GUARANTEE REFERENDUM ON SEPTEMBER 13, 1983.
Consent Agenda
Item d was removed from the consent agenda to be
acted on separately. Council then considered Items a,
b, c, a and f as follows:
a. Proposed Resolution No. 843, will state that
Baytown City Council has no objection to the
location and operation of a landfill within the
City of Baytown's Extra - territorial jurisdiction.
This landfill is to be located in the western part
of Chambers County. It will consist of approximately
90 acres west of F.M. 1405, north of F.M. 2354 and
the Ijams Survey. Enclosed is the packet is a
copy of a resolution passed by Chambers County
Commissioners Court approving this as a landfill
site.
We recommend approval of Proposed Resolution No.
843.
b. Proposed Ordinance No. 30714 -3, will award the bid
for the purchase of two - 2'h ton utility trucks
for Public Works Department. Three (3) bids were
received, two of which were no bids. Knapp
Chevrolet submitted the low bid of $38,712.
We recommend the low bidder, Knapp Chevrolet be
awarded this contract.
30714 -10
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 14, 1983
C. Proposed Ordinance No. 30714 -4, will award the bid
for the purchase of a 1/2 ton pickup truck for the
Water Distribution Division. Two bids were
received. Baytown Datsun, Inc. submitted the low
bid of $7,527.09. Council had budgeted $8,000 for
this purchase.
We recommend the low bidder, Baytown Datsun, Inc.
be awarded this contract.
e. Council is asked to consider the request of Peace
Tabernacle Church for water and sewer service
outside the city limits. Enclosed in the agenda
packet is a letter from Don Trumps, Secretary /Treasurer
of the church, requesting water and sewer service.
They are located at 5901 Garth Road. Both services
are provided in the area along Garth Road.
We recommend approval of this request.
f. The Council is asked to consider the request of
Pacer Development for water and sewer service to
the Lone Star Building. Enclosed in the agenda
packet is a letter from Mr. Dan M. Sharp, requesting
this service. This request is for service to be
provided on an interim basis until the utilities
can be constructed by the San Jacinto Place
Municipal Utility District No. 1.
We recommend approval of this request.
Councilman Johnson moved that the Consent Agenda Items
a, b, c, a and f be adopted as presented; Councilman Dickens
seconded the motion.
In response to inquiries from Council regarding the
consent agenda, Assistant City Manager, Larry Patterson,
stated that Pacer Development would pay the capitol buy -in
charge, along with the proper connection charges. When the
MUD is activated, the MUD will be credited accordingly.
Peace Tabernacle Church will be paying a capitol buy -in
charge, along with connection charges to the City of Baytown
and the city will in turn make proper reimbursements to any
developers who have incurred the costs of extension.
Councilman Philips mentioned that in a previous meeting
Council had made a request that the bid tab contain the
number of bidders invited to bid. He pointed out that on
the bid sheet for the 2� ton trucks, in just looking at the
information, one would gather that only one bid was received,
and it appears that only three firms were invited to bid.
Not many local people were invited to bid. Therefore, it
raises the question of what about the local companies.
Mr. Patterson explained that invitations to bid were
mailed to five vendors which did include local vendors. The
city's bid came out during the time that the companies were
changing over from the 1983 line to 1984. Many of the
companies at this time since they don't have the prices on
30714 -11
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 14, 1983
the new models were unable to submit a bid. With the bid that
was received, the Administration did have to go through a
process to assure that the bid was competitive.
Councilman Philips requested that Council be provided
with information as to how many bids were requested. Mr.
Patterson explained that through this bid, the staff had
learned that this time of the year is not the time to advertise
for bids. The dealer who did bid had ready access to the
vehicle, if not he probably wouldn't have been able to bid
at this time either. The vote follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons,
Fuller and Dickens
Mayor Cannon
Nays: None
RESOLUTION NO. 843
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
STATING THAT THE CITY DOES NOT OBJECT TO TH E
AND OPERATION OF A PROPOSED LANDFILL WITHIN
EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION; AND PROVIDIN G
DATE HEREOF.
ORDINANCE NO. 3653
OF BAYTOWN
LOCATION
BAYTOWW S
FOR THE EFFECTIVE
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF KNA.PP CHEVROLET FOR TWO
2 1/2 TON UTILITY TRUCKS AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE
CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF THIRTY EIGHT THOUSAND SEVEN
HUNDRED TWELVE AND N01100 ($38,712.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed
Ordinance No. 30714 -3)
ORDINANCE NO. 3654
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF BAYTOWN DATSUN, INC.
FOR A 1/2 TON PICKUP TRUCK AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT
BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF SEVEN THOUSAND FIVE
HUNDRED TWENTY SEVEN AND 09/100 ($7,527.09) DOLLARS.
(Proposed Ordinance No. 30714 -4)
For bid tabulations, see Attachments "A" and "B" respectively.
Consider Proposed Ordinance, Awarding Bid for Purchase of
Front End Loader / Backhoe
One bid was received from Stewart & Stevenson for
the amount of $26,480.23; however, the bid did not meet
specifications. Therefore, the Administration recommended
that the bid be rejected and that the Administration be
authorized to readvertise for receipt of bids.
Councilman Johnson moved to reject the bid of Stewart
& Stevenson for the purchase of front end loader /backhoe
and to authorize the Administration to readvertise for receipt of
bids; Councilman Dickens seconded the motion. The vote follows:
30714-12
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 14, 19.83
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons,
Fuller and Dickens
Mayor Cannon
Nays: None
Consider Appointments to Mechanical Board
Councilman Fuller moved that Johnny Moore, a registered
mechanical engineer; Thomas R. Kelley, a licensed mechanical
contractor and John Alexander, Jr., air conditioning /refrigeration
journeyman be reappointed to the Mechanical Board; Councilman
Philips seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons,
Fuller and Dickens
Mayor Cannon
Nays: None
One other member, Leonard E. Hlanak, general contractor,
has resigned; therefore, Mayor Cannon requested that the Baytown
Sun publish the fact that Council is interested in a general
contractor who would be interested in appointment to the board.
Consider Appointment to Urban Rehabilitation Standards
Review Board
Councilman Johnson moved that Reverend Mack Cook,
Associate Pastor of First Baptist Church, be appointed to the
Urban Rehabilitation Standards Review Board; Councilman
Simmons seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons,
Fuller and Dickens
Mayor Cannon
Nays: None
Appointment to 9 -1 -1 Board
Councilman Fuller requested a consensus of Council on
the appointment to the 9 -1 -1 Board since Council had been furnished
with information concerning those persons being considered. Council
unanimously favored Councilman Fuller for that appointment.
Breath Test Program
Councilman Simmons informed Council that the Breath Test
Program had been funded with a $7700 contribution from Galveston
County; $5,000 from the City of Baytown and the remainder from
Harris County Commissioners Court.
30714 -13
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 14, 1983
Recess Into Executive Session
Mayor Cannon recessed the open meeting into executive
session to discuss pending litigation. When the open meeting
reconvened, the Mayor announced that there was no action to
be taken.
Adjourn
There being no further business to be transacted, the
meeting was adjourned.
I if-AL-W L..E-
Lynda K lgore, Deputy y Clerk
Approved By:
Ito 12
Eileen P. Hall, City Clerk
I1 L 21 TON UTILITY TRUCK - PUBLIC WORKS
ID: #836 -67
ATE ' j., "a 99 Ivnz 2•nn P M
GITY Or BAYTOWN l
131D TABULATION
Exhibit "A"
EM
QTY
_
DESCRlPT10N
BAYSHORE DODGE
BOB ROBERTSON INC.
KNAPP CHEVROLET
UNIT.
EXTENOED
UNIT
EXTENDED
UNIT
X N
UNIT
EXTE+ -SJ
UN:T
$z'c
1
2
21 TON UTILITY TRUCK
NO BID
NO BID
19356.0
$38,712.00
MODEL:
Chevrolet
C 70
WARRANTY:
12 Montt,
12,000 Mil
DELIVERY:.
120 day
ARO
GROSS TOTAL
LESS DISC
NET IOTA L
n =1-Pr Jn 14
.r{
A
A
W
�o
o�
W w
Q
M Co
m
H
N
p
ac
w
Q
3
0
U.
x
L)
at
a
m
Y
V
CL
z
O
H
N
E
a
0
0
IN
M
0o
C1
N
C7
C
7
7
�1a w
fir►
J
�(na�
i
•
C LIn j
J Z C
I�l
CL.Q
4I
F. V
•. l
11
y t
Li
UJI
V
1 _
2
J
Q
- s
a�
°
.O GN
>
c
,
yz"
�
N
N
�
M
to F- •o
Q
x
co
f*_
N
'-
fh
4^
.-
V ..--
Z
!
O
O
O
.9 u
2
m
N
U%
co
LA
L -
._ •
4t
iL Ip N
V
W
?
Z
p
zw
m
•
N
a
Z
�
W
a]
o
�Q
m
°
co
a,
m
co
N
W
V
O
O
O
O
N
x
�a
w
co
in
u
C
•a o
.�
u
t
a v-
#
v
O
o _
-
x a
c
•L.
w
.�
C.1 N
J
>
(�
Qa;
L
4-+
F-
J
CL
a
V
v
o
Q
z ca
H
N N
p
L
�
fir►
J
�(na�
i
•
C LIn j
J Z C