Loading...
1983 07 14 CC Minutes30714 -1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN July 14, 1983 The City Council of the City of Baytown, Texas, met in regular session on Thursday, July 14, 1983, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the Baytown City Hall with the fol- lowing attendance: Fred T. Philips Jimmy Johnson Perry M. Simmons Mary E. Wilbanks Roy L. Fuller Gerald Dickens Allen Cannon Fritz Lanham Larry Patterson Randy Strong Eileen P. Hall Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilwoman -- Absent Councilman Councilman Mayor City Manager -- Absent Assistant City Manager City Attorney City Clerk The meeting was called to order with a quorum present. After the invocation was offered, the following business was transacted: Consider Minutes for the Regular Meeting Held June 23, 1983 Councilman Johnson moved for approval of the minutes for the meeting held June 23, 1983; Councilman Philips seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Fuller and Dickens Mayor Cannon Nays: None Receive Petitions No petitions were presented. City Manager's Report Angel's Construction and Harris County have asked the City if it would be permissible to close North Main from Baker Road to Crosby Cedar -Bayou Lynchburg to expedite the construction of North Main for a period of approximately six weeks. They will be working primarily on the west two lanes. They feel that by doing this they can put some addi- tional crews on the job, speed the work up and get that portion of the job finished before school starts. This section would be closed to through traffic but other traffic would be routed around the equipment. Council inquired of the City Attorney, Randy Strong, if this was legal. Council was assured by the City Attorney that because this is only to be a temporary closing that it is legal. Council expressed 30714 -2 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 14, 1983 concern because of inconvenience to residents in that area, plus mail vehicles, and especially emergency vehicles. Assistant City Manager, Larry Patterson reported that arrange- ments would be made to facilitate emergency vehicles. Council agreed that the contractor was facing some problems with this work because of the traffic but suggested some alternate solutions, such as closing the street one day at a time, or keeping only one lane open. Councilman Simmons expressed concern for the small businesses in that area and how the closing of this section would affect them. After discussion of the closing of this section, Mayor Cannon suggested that Council ask the Administration to go back to the Contractor and the County and see if they could arrive at a better solution to the problem. Fischer -Hill Sanitary Sewer - Construction has begun on a 6 inch sanitary sewer main. The project is 35% complete at this time. Quail Hollow -Baker Road Lift Station Modifications - There is some delay due to the bad weather and due.to the shipment of some of the parts needed to complete this project. A thirty day extension has been granted which brings the completion date to August 5. 1983 Street Extension Project - Bids are due in on July 28, on this project and will be presented to you at the following council meetings. Water lines on Barkaloo, Cedar Bayou- Crosby, and Hardin Road - Bids will be received on August 2, along with the Sanitary Sewer on Rollingbrook Drive. July 4th Celebration at Bicentennial Park - This was the largest and most successful one that we have had. Bobby Rountree and his staff were complimented for a tremendous job. Questions /Comments of Council Councilman Philips brought up that he had been contacted on different occasions concerning what is considered to be a serious traffic hazard at Loop 201 and West Texas Avenue. He referred to a recent auto accident at that intersection in which a young woman had been killed. He feels that the problem is that the people coming off of Loop 201, coming down to Decker Drive have not reduced their speed as they approach the intersection. People entering the intersection on Texas Avenue just don't see the cars approaching from the Loop, and get trapped in the wide street. Councilman Philips asked that the Administration get with the highway department to see if there can be a solution to this problem. 30714 -3 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 14, 1983 Consider Proposed Ordinance, Changing the Name of Martin Luther King Street to Oak Street Council had asked at the last Council meeting that this item be placed on the agenda for the next meeting so that a decision could be reached. Three petitions have been received in regard to this street naming. The first petition in 1981, asked that the portion from Riggs Street to Gentry be named Martin Luther King. That action was taken. A second petition asked that that same portion be changed back to Oak Street. The third petition asked that the name of the street be left as it is. Council was presented with a copy of all three petitions. Councilman Simmons stated that when the first petition was presented to Council, Council acted in good faith in complying with the request at considerable cost and incon- venience to taxpayers and citizens. He indicated that because of his familiarity with this area through his past business, that he is well acquainted with a lot of these residents, and does not feel that there is a real groundswell to change the name of the street back to Oak Street. Councilman Simmons went on to state that in view of this fact, and the fact that it would again cost the taxpayers and citizens money, that no action be taken. Councilman Fuller stated that he did not feel comfortable with the way the petitions were presented and questioned the validity of the petitions. For this reason he felt that it should be left the way it was. Councilman Johnson stated that in talking with Mr. Paul Jones who presented the second petition, that Mr. Jones was adamant that the neighborhood council was not contacted on the first petition. Councilman Johnson stated that Mr. Jones had led him to believe that everyone wanted the name changed back because the street was not suitable to honor this distinguished American. At this point, Councilman Johnson made a motion that Martin Luther King Street be changed back to Oak Street; Councilman Philips seconded the motion. Councilman Philips stated that he was persuaded by what had been presented to Council and by the !number of names on the petitions. He recognized some of the',names as bonafide residents and felt that the majority of the people were asking for this change; therefore, Council would be responding to the wants of the citizens to make the change. Mayor Cannon stated that in reviewing the petition, he did see some discrepancies, and he felt that Mr. Jones does not represent the majority of the people in Oak Addition. Mayor Cannon stated that the Police Chief and his staff could take care of some of the problems that are going on in this neighborhood that are behind the feeling that the street is not befitting to Martin Luther King. Vera Bowen, a resident of Oak Street, stated that the street was the same when the petition was originated and the name was changed to Martin Luther King. She suggested that they clean up the street instead of change the name. 30714 -4 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 14, 1983 The vote follows: Nays: Council members Simmons, Fuller, Dickens Mayor Cannon Ayes: Councilman Johnson and Philips Consider Appeal of E. C. Porter from the Decision of the Chief Building Inspector Regarding Buffer Fencing E. C. Porter appeared before Council to ask that he be allowed to have his new business on the same location of his old business and not have to build a buffer fence between his business and the residence of Mrs. M. B. Carter, his neighbor. Mrs. Carter has also provided a letter stating that she has no problem with this type of arrangment. Councilman Johnson made a motion that this variance be granted and Mr. Porter be allowed to put his building there without a fence. Councilman Philips seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Johnson, Philips, Simmons, Fuller and Dickens Mayor Cannon Nays: None Dale Calcarone Will Appear Dale Calcarone appeared before Council to question the ordinances requiring that licensed contractors perform the electrical and plumbing work on business establishments. His argument was that if a person can perfommi repair work in these areas on his residence, why wouldn't a person be allowed to perform that same work on his own business? Mr. Calcarone felt that he should be allowed to perform this work since he owned the business and would have the work inspected by the proper building inspectors. In response to an inquiry from Council, Randy Strong, City Attorney, explained that the ordinances involved do not provide that an individual may perform work on a business establishment that he owns without being properly licensed to do so, and the ordinances would have to be amended to make that provision. Variances cannot be granted. Councilman Philips felt that the difference between a private residence and a business establishment is that the health, safety, and general welfare of the public is involved. He also pointed out that the Inspection Department is probably not manned to supervise every move made by an unlicensed individual. Mayor Cannon indicated that he was receptive to what Mr. Calcarone was saying because he felt that Council should encourage the refurbishing of Texas Avenue, but he realized that there is a safety factor involved. Therefore, Mayor Cannon asked if Council desired to hold a work session. 30714 -5 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 14, 1983 Councilman Johnson moved to schedule a work session for August 11, 1983 at 5:00 p.m.; Councilman Dickens seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Johnson, Fuller and Dickens Mayor Cannon Nays: Council members Philips and Simmons Discuss Noise Control Ordinance Council was provided with a copy of the existing Noise Control Ordinance, a copy of proposed ordinance alternates 1 and 2, a model ordinance from the EPA, as well as sound levels established by other jurisdictions. City Attorney, Randy Strong, discussed in detail the different approaches to noise ordinances and provided some guidelines to consider. He also gave some examples of decibel levels of certain situations. Councilman Fuller stated that Council had decided the necessity for a noise control ordinance because of the situation in Graywood. However, Council needed to recognize that because of industry and other factors, Baytown may not be the simple standard situation when it comes to noise control, and a very in depth study should be made before restraints are put on industry and other commercial establishments. Other Council members concurred and expressed the feeling that perhaps a public hearing would be beneficial to derive input from various segments of the community. Mayor Cannon recognized Leonard Stasney, representative of Exxon, who stated that Exxon feels that it is right and proper for Council to address the health, safety and welfare of its citizens. However, Baytown is a unique city and perhaps the same standards should not apply throughout the city. For instance, should the ordinance specify different levels for different periods throughout the day? There is a lot of ambiant noise in the daytime that is not prevalent at night. Should the absolute pressure level (dba level) be established as an average of day and night sounds? Should the ordinance include a provision for the correction of the characteristic of the sound, that is, is it a pure tone or a pulsating tone? What should the time limit for a violation be? The ordinance is silent in a number of areas. In the area of enforcement the ordinance is silent on testing. What kind of equipment, procedures, standards, etc. are necessary? In the area of exemptions, there are certain emergency situations where noises are increased. At Exxon, for example, under normal conditions the pumps and compressors are driven by electric motors which are relatively quiet, but if power is lost, then the operation is switched to steam turbine drivers which are quite a bit noiser. This is a temporary situation and provision for temporary situa- tions should be included in the ordinance. Probably some terminology in the draft ordinance could be improved, for example the words pressure safety relief valve could be better described as a pressure relief system because at Exxon there are a number of pressure valves which'go into a flare system which in itself is a Safety valve or safety system. 30714 -6 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 14, 1983 The bottom line is that the company feels this to be an extremely technical subject and one, if it is to be applied, should be applied in a manner to accomplish the intent of what Council wants to accomplish without any adverse long range impact on the community. Mr. Stasney offered Exxon's expertise in whatever area Council would desire to help develop an ordinance that would be satisfactory to specific areas in Baytown to address the specific kinds of problems that Baytown has and the specific conditions existing in Baytown. Council agreed that they were not prepared to make any decision on this draft at this time, and that any help that Exxon, U. S. Steel or other industries with more expertise in this field could provide would be greatly appreciated. Mayor Cannon pointed out that this issue had come before Council several times in the past and the time has now come to come up with a definite and workable ordinance concerning noise control. Council agreed that Mayor Cannon should appoint a task force made up of Council members, as well as representatives of small business, homeowners, and industry. Delapidated Buildings In response to an inquiry from Councilman Johnson regarding the inspection of occupied residences for health or structural reasons, Larry Patterson, Assistant City Manager, explained that the City of Baytown has very broad powers with regard to health, safety and welfare of its citizens and that any time a health violation is reported that possible problem is inspected and proper action is taken by the city to rectify the situation. Leonary Stasney, Chairman of the Baytown Clean City Commission, mentioned that there are a number of areas in the city where the homes are in a run down state, and you will find in a number of these cases materials strawn around the home which causes vermin and insect infestation. Jean Shepherd, a member of the Community Development Advisory Board, stated that in other cities persons with homes in a delapidated state are given notice to bring those homes up to standard. Mayor Cannon suggested that the Administration should be more agressive with regard to establishment and enforcement of standards to cause individuals to repair delapidated structures and cleanup around such structures whether those structures are occupied or not. 30714 -7 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 14, 1983 Consider Proposed Ordinance, Abandoning and Vacating Overhead Easement Between 3500 and 3502 Savell Drive, Section One, Whispering Pines Subdivision Mr. Ervin H. Boessling has requested that an overhead easement between 3500 and 3502 Savell Drive, Section One, of Whispering Pines Subdivision be vacated and abandoned. Mr. Boessling owns the two pieces of property in question and would like this abandonment so that he can better utilize these properties. All utility companies have been contacted and have no objections to this abandonment. There are no underground easements in this section. The Administration recommended approval of the ordinance. Councilman Philips moved for adoption of the ordinance; Councilman Johnson seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Fuller and Dickens Mayor Cannon Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 3652 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, PROVIDING THAT A PORTION OF AN OVERHEAD UTILITY EASEMENT BE VACATED, ABANDONED AND CLOSED; PROVIDING FOR THE QUITCLAIMING OF THE CITY'S INTEREST IN SAID PROPERTY; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Consider Proposed Resolution No. 842, Expressing Council's Support for the Harris County Toll Road Election The proposed resolution would express Council's support for the Harris County Toll Road Election for the Hardy Road Toll Road Project. Council had been furnished with a copy of a letter from County Judge Jon Lindsay urging Council's support of the project, along with a copy of a letter from Beverly Heinrich, President of Harris County Mayors' and Councils' Association. Councilman Simmons commented that the two things that have brought this to a climax were the legislature's failure to allocate necessary funds for the highway department, and the MTA's failure in its referendum to provide heavy rail service. Therefore, the matter of congestion and lack of mobility in Houston chiefly and in the county primarily has brought this so greatly into focus, that Judge Lindsay with Commissioner's Court backing has entertained this program whereby a $900,000,000 authorization, guaranteed bond referendum would be considered by the voters. The climate is such that a lot of people who are disenchanted with the MTA do not desire to pay any more sales taxes and most people do not want to pay any more ad valorem taxes. Therefore, in order to finance the highways to relieve the congestion, a toll road seemed to be the best solution. The Hardy Street Toll Road is a project that the Texas Turnpike Authority has been studying for some time. It came out of preliminary report in January indicating that the project would be 30714 -8 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 22, 1983 economical and fiscally feasible. Further compatibility studies were made with the MTA to ascertain if the MTA might participate in the right of way with the heavy rail system and that came back favorably. Judge Lindsay feels that the county can do a much better, more economical job of construction on!the Hardy Street Toll Road Project than the TTA. The county has a AAA bond rating while the Texas Turnpike Authority would have either a BAA or BBB rating on the type bonds they would have to sell which would be net revenue bonds. With the county guaranteeing the revenue bonds with its AAA rating, the county could get a much better interest savings -- 14% or lh %. The legislature recently authorized the county to enable them to sell gross revenue bonds with the net revenue bonds that the TTA has, maintenance and operation expenses are paid off the top and the remainder is applied toward paying off toll bonds. In gross revenue bonds, like the county could sell, all the proceeds from the toll revenues may be applied to the retirement of the debt. Maintenance and operation would be paid out of the road and bridge fund. The benefit to the people of Baytown for this toll road is that some of the traffic congestion will be taken off I -45 and Highway 59. It would also take alot of the truck traffic to the Port of Houston and the eastern part of the county. The feasibility study has shown that the Hardy Street Toll Road will be very heavily traveled and a money making road. By pooling that with the other projects which the county hopes to accomplish on Beltway 81 the hope is that the Hardy Street Toll Road will produce the necessary revenue to cover other areas that aren't doing as well. The whole point is that the county can do this project much cheaper than the TTA. The Hardy Street Toll Road Project would be a $384,000,000 project. The county would only have to sell a portion of the bonds to complete the project, while the TTA would have to sell a $465,000,000 bond issue because they are required to put up a 1.2 to 1 ratio as a contingency. Their interest rate in order to make the project feasible would have to be in the neighborhood of 9.32% and the county's financial advisors advise that presently the rate is about 10.6% for that type bond. By the savings the county could make on Hardy Street, more funds would be available for providing other thoroughfares in Harris County. Another interest to Baytown would be the bridge south of the tunnel. It seems that the highway department representatives are saying that if that bridge is ever constructed, in all probability it will be a toll bridge. The County Commissioners Court feels that a program can be put together that will give the most for the citizens money whereby the users will pay the fees. A number of people are concerned about the $9,000,000 authorization. These are guaranteed bonds. It is not anticipated that the revenues are going to be sufficient to pay the interest and carrying on the toll facilities, but if the revenues are insufficient, that would entail a tax increase. The difference between the Texas Turnpike Authority and Harris County is that the bond holders would be responsible for a TTA default, but in the event that the county had to default, the county would have to increase taxes to pay the indebtedness. 30714 -9 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 14, 1983 Mayor Cannon stated that he would have to relate this issue to the high rise bridge where the traffic has not met expectations. However, he felt the approach problems to the bridge has had a negative impact and traffic will improve. The increased traffic in the area of Farm Road 1960, I -45 and Highway 59 area is evident support of this proposal, may free up funds for other areas and may influence the construction of the channel bridge. Councilman Philips moved for adoption of the resolution; Councilman Fuller seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Fuller and Dickens Mayor Cannon Nays: None RESOLUTION NO. 842 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN SUPPORTING THE NINE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLAR REVENUE BOND GUARANTEE REFERENDUM ON SEPTEMBER 13, 1983. Consent Agenda Item d was removed from the consent agenda to be acted on separately. Council then considered Items a, b, c, a and f as follows: a. Proposed Resolution No. 843, will state that Baytown City Council has no objection to the location and operation of a landfill within the City of Baytown's Extra - territorial jurisdiction. This landfill is to be located in the western part of Chambers County. It will consist of approximately 90 acres west of F.M. 1405, north of F.M. 2354 and the Ijams Survey. Enclosed is the packet is a copy of a resolution passed by Chambers County Commissioners Court approving this as a landfill site. We recommend approval of Proposed Resolution No. 843. b. Proposed Ordinance No. 30714 -3, will award the bid for the purchase of two - 2'h ton utility trucks for Public Works Department. Three (3) bids were received, two of which were no bids. Knapp Chevrolet submitted the low bid of $38,712. We recommend the low bidder, Knapp Chevrolet be awarded this contract. 30714 -10 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 14, 1983 C. Proposed Ordinance No. 30714 -4, will award the bid for the purchase of a 1/2 ton pickup truck for the Water Distribution Division. Two bids were received. Baytown Datsun, Inc. submitted the low bid of $7,527.09. Council had budgeted $8,000 for this purchase. We recommend the low bidder, Baytown Datsun, Inc. be awarded this contract. e. Council is asked to consider the request of Peace Tabernacle Church for water and sewer service outside the city limits. Enclosed in the agenda packet is a letter from Don Trumps, Secretary /Treasurer of the church, requesting water and sewer service. They are located at 5901 Garth Road. Both services are provided in the area along Garth Road. We recommend approval of this request. f. The Council is asked to consider the request of Pacer Development for water and sewer service to the Lone Star Building. Enclosed in the agenda packet is a letter from Mr. Dan M. Sharp, requesting this service. This request is for service to be provided on an interim basis until the utilities can be constructed by the San Jacinto Place Municipal Utility District No. 1. We recommend approval of this request. Councilman Johnson moved that the Consent Agenda Items a, b, c, a and f be adopted as presented; Councilman Dickens seconded the motion. In response to inquiries from Council regarding the consent agenda, Assistant City Manager, Larry Patterson, stated that Pacer Development would pay the capitol buy -in charge, along with the proper connection charges. When the MUD is activated, the MUD will be credited accordingly. Peace Tabernacle Church will be paying a capitol buy -in charge, along with connection charges to the City of Baytown and the city will in turn make proper reimbursements to any developers who have incurred the costs of extension. Councilman Philips mentioned that in a previous meeting Council had made a request that the bid tab contain the number of bidders invited to bid. He pointed out that on the bid sheet for the 2� ton trucks, in just looking at the information, one would gather that only one bid was received, and it appears that only three firms were invited to bid. Not many local people were invited to bid. Therefore, it raises the question of what about the local companies. Mr. Patterson explained that invitations to bid were mailed to five vendors which did include local vendors. The city's bid came out during the time that the companies were changing over from the 1983 line to 1984. Many of the companies at this time since they don't have the prices on 30714 -11 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 14, 1983 the new models were unable to submit a bid. With the bid that was received, the Administration did have to go through a process to assure that the bid was competitive. Councilman Philips requested that Council be provided with information as to how many bids were requested. Mr. Patterson explained that through this bid, the staff had learned that this time of the year is not the time to advertise for bids. The dealer who did bid had ready access to the vehicle, if not he probably wouldn't have been able to bid at this time either. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Fuller and Dickens Mayor Cannon Nays: None RESOLUTION NO. 843 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY STATING THAT THE CITY DOES NOT OBJECT TO TH E AND OPERATION OF A PROPOSED LANDFILL WITHIN EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION; AND PROVIDIN G DATE HEREOF. ORDINANCE NO. 3653 OF BAYTOWN LOCATION BAYTOWW S FOR THE EFFECTIVE AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF KNA.PP CHEVROLET FOR TWO 2 1/2 TON UTILITY TRUCKS AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF THIRTY EIGHT THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED TWELVE AND N01100 ($38,712.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 30714 -3) ORDINANCE NO. 3654 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF BAYTOWN DATSUN, INC. FOR A 1/2 TON PICKUP TRUCK AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF SEVEN THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED TWENTY SEVEN AND 09/100 ($7,527.09) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 30714 -4) For bid tabulations, see Attachments "A" and "B" respectively. Consider Proposed Ordinance, Awarding Bid for Purchase of Front End Loader / Backhoe One bid was received from Stewart & Stevenson for the amount of $26,480.23; however, the bid did not meet specifications. Therefore, the Administration recommended that the bid be rejected and that the Administration be authorized to readvertise for receipt of bids. Councilman Johnson moved to reject the bid of Stewart & Stevenson for the purchase of front end loader /backhoe and to authorize the Administration to readvertise for receipt of bids; Councilman Dickens seconded the motion. The vote follows: 30714-12 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 14, 19.83 Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Fuller and Dickens Mayor Cannon Nays: None Consider Appointments to Mechanical Board Councilman Fuller moved that Johnny Moore, a registered mechanical engineer; Thomas R. Kelley, a licensed mechanical contractor and John Alexander, Jr., air conditioning /refrigeration journeyman be reappointed to the Mechanical Board; Councilman Philips seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Fuller and Dickens Mayor Cannon Nays: None One other member, Leonard E. Hlanak, general contractor, has resigned; therefore, Mayor Cannon requested that the Baytown Sun publish the fact that Council is interested in a general contractor who would be interested in appointment to the board. Consider Appointment to Urban Rehabilitation Standards Review Board Councilman Johnson moved that Reverend Mack Cook, Associate Pastor of First Baptist Church, be appointed to the Urban Rehabilitation Standards Review Board; Councilman Simmons seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Fuller and Dickens Mayor Cannon Nays: None Appointment to 9 -1 -1 Board Councilman Fuller requested a consensus of Council on the appointment to the 9 -1 -1 Board since Council had been furnished with information concerning those persons being considered. Council unanimously favored Councilman Fuller for that appointment. Breath Test Program Councilman Simmons informed Council that the Breath Test Program had been funded with a $7700 contribution from Galveston County; $5,000 from the City of Baytown and the remainder from Harris County Commissioners Court. 30714 -13 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - July 14, 1983 Recess Into Executive Session Mayor Cannon recessed the open meeting into executive session to discuss pending litigation. When the open meeting reconvened, the Mayor announced that there was no action to be taken. Adjourn There being no further business to be transacted, the meeting was adjourned. I if-AL-W L..E- Lynda K lgore, Deputy y Clerk Approved By: Ito 12 Eileen P. Hall, City Clerk I1 L 21 TON UTILITY TRUCK - PUBLIC WORKS ID: #836 -67 ATE ' j., "a 99 Ivnz 2•nn P M GITY Or BAYTOWN l 131D TABULATION Exhibit "A" EM QTY _ DESCRlPT10N BAYSHORE DODGE BOB ROBERTSON INC. KNAPP CHEVROLET UNIT. EXTENOED UNIT EXTENDED UNIT X N UNIT EXTE+ -SJ UN:T $z'c 1 2 21 TON UTILITY TRUCK NO BID NO BID 19356.0 $38,712.00 MODEL: Chevrolet C 70 WARRANTY: 12 Montt, 12,000 Mil DELIVERY:. 120 day ARO GROSS TOTAL LESS DISC NET IOTA L n =1-Pr Jn 14 .r{ A A W �o o� W w Q M Co m H N p ac w Q 3 0 U. x L) at a m Y V CL z O H N E a 0 0 IN M 0o C1 N C7 C 7 7 �1a w fir► J �(na� i • C LIn j J Z C I�l CL.Q 4I F. V •. l 11 y t Li UJI V 1 _ 2 J Q - s a� ° .O GN > c , yz" � N N � M to F- •o Q x co f*_ N '- fh 4^ .- V ..-- Z ! O O O .9 u 2 m N U% co LA L - ._ • 4t iL Ip N V W ? Z p zw m • N a Z � W a] o �Q m ° co a, m co N W V O O O O N x �a w co in u C •a o .� u t a v- # v O o _ - x a c •L. w .� C.1 N J > (� Qa; L 4-+ F- J CL a V v o Q z ca H N N p L � fir► J �(na� i • C LIn j J Z C