Loading...
1983 04 14 CC Minutes30414 -1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN April 14, 1983 The City Council of the City of Baytown, Texas, met in regular session on Thursday, April 14, 1983, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the Baytown City Hall with the following attendance: Fred T. Philips Jimmy Johnson Perry M. Simmons Mary E. Wilbanks Roy L. Fuller Allen Cannon Emmett 0. Hutto Fritz Lanham Larry Patterson Randy Strong Eileen P. Hall Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilman Mayor City Manager Assistant City Manager City Attorney City Clerk The meeting was called to order with a quorum present. After the invocation was offered, the following business was conducted: Minutes Councilman Philips moved for approval of the minutes for special and regular meetings held on March 24, 1983, as well as the special meeting held on April 5, 1983; Councilwoman Wilbanks seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None Receive Petitions Mr. Paul E. Jones of 1100 Johnston Street presented a petition on behalf of 232 signers which petition indicated that the signers desired to have the name Martin Luther King changed back to Oak Street. The petitioners also indicated that it was not that they would not want a street named for Mr. King, but they would want a street more deserving to be named Martin Luther King. Mr. Jones indicated that the first petition had not been presented to the neighborhood council, but this petition had been presented to the council and accepted. Councilman Johnson moved for acceptance of the petition; Councilman Fuller seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None 30414 -2 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - April 14, 1983 City Manager's Report Civics Day - A large group of Sterling High School students visited with their counterparts at City Hall today. It was a very productive day because the students viewed first hand how local government works and the staff members were able to answer questions and better show what they do and why. A mock council meeting was performed where the participants reacted much as the elected Council members. All in all the day was enjoyable and informative. Houston Lighting and Power - Council was furnished with a copy of a letter from Houston Lighting and Power regarding the fuel adjustment cost which reflects that for April, the user of 1,000 KWH will be charged $77.06 versus $73.83 which was charged for the month of March. Attached to that letter is a nine month summary for comparison. Councilman Philips suggested that the Administration forward a letter to the Public Utilities Commission in Council's name over Mayor Hutto's signature which would reflect that Council reviewed these costs this date and viewed them with considerable alarm and asked that every possible action be taken to turn this trend around. Mayor Hutto also suggested that a copy of that letter should be forwarded to Governor White, Council had no objections. West Little League - Council had received an invitation from the West Little League inviting Council to opening day ceremonies for Saturday, April 16 at 12:00 p.m. Travel Survey Form - Council was furnished with a travel survey form which the Administration proposes to use as part of the transportation study. The proposed questionaire will be distributed by various sources and will be returned by mail to the city. Community Development Block Grant - As a result of the Jobs Bill that was recently adopted, the Community Develop- ment Block Grant allocation for Baytown will be increased by about $180,000. The staff is working on the application and the necessary steps to obtain this additional funding. Rollingbrook Drive Extension - Condemnation hearing has been scheduled for April 20 on property along Rollingbrook Drive Extension. Mosquito Control - The County Mosquito Control Division sprays the county, as well as inside cities, but Baytown always supplements that. The city's program has already begun. The city will be covered once each two weeks. With the mild winter, the staff expects the mosquito problem will be great. Drainage - East Homan has been completed and Alva is about forty (400) percent complete. Work in that subdivision is about seventy -five (75%) percent complete. Coachlight, one of the four streets where storm sewers are being installed, is about ninety -eight (98 %) percent complete. Phase II of the 1982 -83 Sliplining Contract'- The con- tractor has sliplined 1100 feet of Linwood Drive and 914 feet of West Main. No work has begun on West Sterling /Defee, Hemphill Streets. 30414 -3 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - April 14, 1983 Mayors, Councilmembers and Commissioners Institute - Council had been provided with information concerning the institute to be held in E1 Paso on June 4 and 5, 1983. The staff will arrange to register Council if so notified. Council's Questions /Comments Councilman Johnson mentioned that he had been questioned by a group of Senior Citizens as to why there was no distri- bution of cheese in Baytown. Larry Patterson, Assistant the Gulf Coast Community Servic distribution of milk and cheese been made on a random basis and working with the agency to work distribution. City Manager, explained that as Agency is in charge of products. Distribution has currently Mr. Patterson is out a smoother system of Councilman Johnson commented that the program should be advertised more extensively because a number of people that he had spoken with were unaware of a distribution in Baytown. Councilman Cannon commended the Baytown Police Department and other law enforcement agencies for their recent and very thorough investigation of narcotics problems in the Baytown area. Councilman Cannon brought up the matter of the notice of public hearing on the waste discharge permit for Anheuser- Busch. He inquired if the Administration had received any information in this regard. Mr. Lanham responded that the first he knew of the application was what was discussed in the Baytown Sun. Councilman Cannon stated that according to the paper this permit is up for renewal and the paper had indicated that there will be a public hearing. However, Councilman Cannon felt that Council should go on record that Council would like assurance that there is going to be a public hearing. The facility is not within the city limits, but one of these days it will be right in the heart of the City of Baytown. This is a five year permit from the time of approval. Councilman Cannon pointed out that accord- ing to the letter received by Ms. Leavins the company had been operating without a permit since June of last year. He inquired if the City had a right to intervene? Mr. Lanham responded that the Administration could look into it. Councilman Cannon inquired if Ms. Leavins could address Council. Mayor Hutto stated that everyone on Council had an interest regarding what happens north of Baytown. Council- man Johnson stated that he had not heard of any problems out there and if there are problems, Council needs to know. Councilman Cannon responded that he was not certain that there are problems, but he felt that the people should have input at a public hearing. Ms. Leavins stated that she had received her notice on March 26 that the company had applied for renewal of their old Permit No. 02167 which expired June 30, 1982. She said that the company has been transporting and spraying this spent grain liquor all this time without a permit. If the company had requested a permit prior to June, she did not receive notice. 30414 -4 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - April 14, 1983 She felt that since she has now received notice on March 26, 1983 on this, then she should have received notice back then. She stated that the plant was a nuisance. The odor is terrible and will affect the whole city since Baytown is coming out I -10. She stated that she was requesting that the city protest against this renewal and for Council to request that a hearing on the application be held in Baytown. Councilwoman Wilbanks inquired as to who would conduct the hearing. Ms. Leavins responded that one of the Chief Hearing Examiners from Austin. Councilwoman Wilbanks asked which agency would be involved. Ms. Leavins stated that the Texas Water Commission had forwarded the letter. Ms. Leavins had spoken with one of the Chief Examiners, James Larkin, and had inquired of him why had Anheuser -Busch been allowed to operate for 10 months without a permit. Mr. Larkin responded that he did not know the reason. Councilwoman Wilbanks stated that she would be very hesitant to take a stand on the issue, but certainly if Council would agree she would like to see Council send a letter to ask that a public hearing be held. Councilman Cannon concurred. He stated that he didn't know if there were any valid complaints with regard to the operation or not, but there certainly could be a public hearing. Ms. Leavins pointed out that something had to be done before the 21st day of April or the permit would automatically be granted. Councilman Johnson inquired if a private citizen or a group of neighbors could request a hearing. He said that he was certain Council would go on record to ask for it, but the time was close. He inquired if Ms. Leavins or her neighbors could call the Texas Water Commission to ask that a hearing be held. Ms. Leavins stated that she has forwarded a letter re- questing a hearing, but has not received a reply. She said that she is asking Baytown's support because this area is within Baytown's extra - territorial jurisdiction. Councilman Johnson stated that what some of the Council members were getting at is that they did not know if they should be the intervenors and ask for the hearing or whether the people who are directly affected should ask for the hearing. Ms. Leavins responded that she felt that Council should help. Councilman Cannon stated that it seemed to him that it would be proper for the City Attorney's office or the Admin- istration and Council to send a letter that Ms. Leavins had appeared before Council requesting that the residents of that area be assured of a public hearing. Councilman Cannon inquired if this could be done since there was no item on the agenda. Mr. Lanham responded that no action could be taken. Councilman Johnson inquired if a letter could be drafted. Mr. Lanham responded that if he were instructed to write a letter asking for a hearing, then he would do so. 30414 -5 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - April 14, 1983 Mayor Hutto inquired if the letter couldn't say that Ms. Leavins appeared before Council and requested a hearing. Council wouldn't have to take any action like that. Mr. Lanham said that way Council would not be saying that they are asking for anything. Council would be passing on infor- mation. Mayor Hutto explained to Ms. Leavins that in order to take formal action, an item must be on the agenda. Ms. Leavins stated that she realized that she should not have waited this long, but alot of people feel what's the use, they'll get it anyhow. Mayor Hutto stated we can write a letter and relate that Ms. Leavins appeared before Council without taking official action. Council had no objections. Councilwoman Wilbanks explained to the delegation that presented the petition regarding the change in street name that Council's usual procedure is to accept a petition and refer that petition to the Administration for further action at a later meeting. Mr. Jones inquired if this matter would be on the next agenda. Mayor Hutto responded that he was certain it would be, but it was up to the Administration to study the matter and make a recommendation. Councilwoman Wilbanks stated that it has been awhile since Council has received information on the Community Development Block Grant Program. She stated that she would appreciate the Administration gathering some information and maybe even people who are serving on that Committee could come to Council to bring Council up to date on what has been happening and how the money has been expended and the success of the projects that have been undertaken. Ted Kloesel Will Appear Mr. Kloesel requested to appear at a later Council meeting. Bob Cunningham Will Appear to Request a Variance to Fire Zone for 2305 North Main Mr. Cunningham did not appear. Consider Proposed Ordinance, Amending the Code of Ordinances by Determining and Fixing the Schedule of Rates to be Charged by Entex, Inc: for Residential and Commercial Gas Service Council had received at the last Council meeting a copy of the request made by Entex, Inc. for cost of service adjustment. Councilman Fuller inquired how long had it been since the company had made a request for cost of service adjustment. 30414 -6 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - April 14, 1983 Richard DeSalme, District Manager for Entex, Inc., responded that-each March the company files its cost of service adjustment. Fuel costs adjustments are requested twice a year. This request represents $ .71 per month per customer which is approximately 1.90 of the average residential bill which is below the Consumer Price Index for 1982. Mr. DeSalme mentioned that the figures submitted to City Council for the requested increase in cost of service are the same figures which have been submitted to the Texas Railroad Commission in the annual report of Entex, Inc. for the Texas Coast Division. Council had been furnished with a copy of that report. In response to an inquiry from Council, Mr. DeSalme ' stated that presently Entex, Inc. in Baytown has less employees than were employed 10 years ago. Occasionally, if the company falls behind in its work, outside contractors are employed. Mr. DeSalme pointed out that there are many things which cause costs to increase other than employee wages -- equipment, supplies, etc. The company operates its equipment from 8 -10 years before replacing it. Councilman Philips moved to adopt the proposed ordinance; Councilman Fuller seconded the motion. A gentleman from the audience inquired what had happened to the cost of Entex, Inc.'s natural gas supply for the last 6 -12 months. Mr. DeSalme responded that the company adjusts twice yearly in Baytown -- August and February. Those adjustments are based purely on the price paid for gas obtained from Entex's suppliers. In February, the company had a decrease in fuel costs of about $ .20 per MTF which amounted to about $ .65 to $ .75 per customer. There have been some definite decreases in the cost of natural gas from pipeline companies. Some of the costs included in cost of natural gas from pipeline companies are costs which those companies have no control over. Mr. DeSalme explained in response to another comment that the company does pass any decrease in fuel costs directly to the consumer; however, if there is an increase in fuel that to is passed directly to the customer. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 3591 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS; DETERMINING AND FIXING THE SCHEDULES OF RATES TO BE CHARGED BY ENTEX, INC., IN THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS, FOR NATURAL GAS AND NATURAL GAS SERVICE FURNISHED BY IT TO RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL CONSUMERS; FIXING THE EFFECTIVE DATES OF GAS RATES PRESCRIBED IN THIS ORDINANCE; MAKING MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS AND REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT. 30414 -7 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - April 14, 1983 Consider Proposed Ordinance, Awarding Bids for City of Baytown Insurance Coverage Several months ago Council authorized a contract with The Wyatt Company to make a survey of the City of Baytown's insurance needs. The survey was made and Council reviewed specifications, authorizing The Wyatt Company to advertise for bids. Six bids were received. Council was furnished with a copy of the recommendation from The Wyatt Company for the award of this contract. Mr. Fred Gillette, representa- tive of The Wyatt Company, was present to discuss the recom- mendation which is Page No. 7 of the report. A copy of that recommendation is attached to the minutes as Attachment "A." Air. Gillette stated that the result of the bidding effort had turned out to be very beneficial for the City of Baytown. The city has ended up on an overall basis with smaller total insurance costs than previously incurred and with greatly improved insurance protection program. Protection has been improved by bringing new coverage into the program, primarily in the area of Public Officials Liability and Law Enforcement Liability and enlarging the scope of coverage on existing insurance. The Wyatt Company has recommended that the award of coverage be made to the James Bond Agency which is one of the six agencies submitting bids. The company has also recommended that the award be made on the basis of a total award rather than trying to make a piecemeal award. This type award gives the city very clear cut accountability from the agent as far as who is responsible for what. By dividing coverage between more than one agent, the city would run the risk of gaps in coverage because of lack of accountability. Mr. Gillette said that overall The Gallagher Corporation would provide better protection to a degree than that submitted by the James Bond Agency; however, The Wyatt Company felt that if the program were to be awarded to the Bond Company, that company would be able to improve on some of the weakness in the program. For example, under public official liability, it is not clear whether the quote includes protection for punitive damages. However, Mr. Gillette did not feel that it would be necessary to rebid the package because the Bond Agency would be asked to improve on the weakness in their program without additional costs to the city. In response to an inquiry from Council, Mr. Gillette pointed out that the package includes $10,000 deductible, but the premium reduction beyond $10,000 would not warrant going to a larger deductible. The financial rating of all insurance carriers involved in the bidding was checked and the ones recommended are all financially sound and will meet the minimum recommendations. The same thing has been done as far as the agents are concerned. Mr. Bond submitted with his quotation evidence of adequate Errors and Omissions Insurance. He also stated that he did not feel that there would be any restrictions on coverage with regard to volunteers. Mr. Gillette explained that the Gallagher program was ' structured on a larger self- insured program and if the city had larger than expected claims, that program could be more expensive. That program is more difficult to evaluate and compare with the other bidders. Mr. Lanham pointed out that if the Gallagher bid is compared to what the city's average loss has been, that would add about $65,000 to Gallagher's minimum bid of $129,515. 30414 -8 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - April 14, 1983 At the end of the year, the Administration can check with the Bond Company to determine what the rates will be and then a decision can be made on whether the city should advertise for bids. Councilman Simmons moved for adoption of the ordinance; Councilman Philips seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 3592 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS, ACCEPTING THE BID OF JAMES BOND & COMPANY FOR PROPERTY AND LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE FOR THE CITY OF BAYTOWN; AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AND ATTEST TO A CONTRACT WITH JAMES BOND & COMPANY; AUTHORIZING PAYMENTS OF PREMIUMS PURSUANT TO THE TERMS OF SAID CONTRACT; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Mr. Lanham mentioned that the Administration would like to have The Wyatt Company review the policies when received. The company would charge the city on a perdiem basis for this service. Mr. Gillette explained that the company pre- viously included the cost of review of policies in the contract, but since a number of clients elected to perform this work themselves and then requested that the company give credit, this is no longer included as part of the original contract. Mr. Lanham felt that it would be in the City of Baytown's best interest to have an expert review the policies; Council concurred. Consider Proposed Ordinance. Adopting a New Chapter of the Code of Ordinances of-the City of Baytown to Regulate Signs Randy Strong, City Attorney, pointed out that in the copy of the ordinance provided to Council, major changes had been underscored, but the minor cleanup items had not been underscored. Another thing that the Legal, Department did on its own, under Section 5 some of that was rewritten to make it very clear as to the city's right to prosecute persons who fail to obtain a permit. The City Attorney reviewed all major changes with Council. Councilman Fuller moved to adopt the proposed ordinance. Mr. Lanham requested that included in the motion be the approval of expenditures to implement the ordinance for the remainder of the year. Estimated costs for the remainder of the year is $8,752 with estimated revenues for that time of $6,000. The estimated costs for a full year of operation would be $30,095 with estimated revenues being $38,000. Therefore, based on the estimates of the Administration, the fees provided for permits would cover expenditures to insure compliance with the ordinance. Councilman Fuller amended the original motion to include that necessary expenses to carry out the implementation of the sign ordinance be included; Councilman Philips seconded the motion. 30414 -9 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - April 14, 1983 Mr. Stan Reed stated that portable signs seemed to be receiving the most attention and he felt that it was not right that the ordinance would take away the right of a man to advertise for 30 days on a portable sign, especially when that sign was on the man's property. Randy Strong, City Attorney, pointed out that an addi- tional change in the ordinance is the deletion of the provision which would have allowed for only one portable sign on a tract of land. He also mentioned that as the ordinance is written, signs that are in existence at the time the ordinance is adopted will need to be assigned an operational permit and those signs may be used within the City of Baytown for two years. There will be no new portable signs brought into the city. Mark Arnold of Mark Arnold Homes expressed his opposition to the proposed sign ordinance because he felt that its adoption would be a hindrance to the businessman providing the public with knowledge of various products and would hinder the public in that they would not know what is available. The owner of Crow's Rentals stated that he had a petition which had been signed by his customers stating their opposition to the sign ordinance. The small independent businessman will be damaged by the adoption of the sign ordinance since their is little money available to the small businessman for advertisement. For what a newspaper ad would cost, the small businessman can rent a sign for a month. This sign would be working for the businessman 30 days, 24 -hours a day. Rick Clark of Baytown Oil Sales concurred with what Mr. Crow and Mr. Arnold had said. Mr. Bill Nethery, representative of various civic organizations, encouraged the adoption of the ordinance on the premise that the ordinance would work toward the good for the greatest number of citizens. He reminded Council that there are a number of people who work in Baytown, but elect to live elsewhere because of the general appearance of the city. Tina Schlobohm, student at Ross Sterling, stated that she felt that signs are a service to the people and there- fore, the ordinance should be revised. Rob Schmerier with Foster and Kleiser stated that he had attended the work sessions related to the proposed sign ordinance. He stated that a great amount of time had been expended toward this ordinance and that the ordinance is what a majority of the people of Baytown want. Mr. Jack Leavins expressed the feeling that the ordinance was too restrictive with regard to portable signs. Mayor Hutto mentioned to those-in attendance that should Council adopt the ordinance that the ordinance cer- tainly could be amended to reflect the views of a majority at any time in the future. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: Councilman Johnson 30414 -10 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - April 14, 1983 ORDINANCE NO. 3593 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN TO REGULATE SIGNS AND BILLBOARDS AND THE PERMITTING THEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Consider Proposed Ordinance, Repealing Section 17 -17, of the Code of Ordinances, "Posting Placards, Bills, Etc. on Public Property Since the provisions of Section 17 -17 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Baytown, "Posting Placards, Bills, Etc. on Public Property," is a part of the newly adopted sign ordinance, the Administration recommended that that section be repealed effective ten (10) days from its passage. The reason that this ordinance should be repealed effective ten (10) days from its passage is that the sign ordinance takes effect ten (10) days after passage. Councilman Johnson moved to Fuller seconded the motion. The Ayes: Council members Phil Wilbanks, Fuller and Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE adopt the ordinance; Councilman vote follows: ips, Johnson, Simmons, Cannon NO. 3594 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 17, "MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS AND OFFENSES" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN BY REPEALING SECTION 17 -17 "POSTING PLACARDS, BILLS, ETC. ON PUBLIC PROPERTY "; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Consider Proposed Ordinance, Authorizing an Agreement with - Lee College for Joint Use of Park Facilities Lee College has plans to have a baseball team and compete in a Community College League. The Administration has-worked out a recommended contract which would enable the college to utilize the Jenkins Park baseball field. The attorney for the college board has reviewed the contract which contract meets with his approval. The contract is similar to contracts the city has with other organizations that use city athletic fields. The Administration recommended approval of the contract. The college would be responsible for maintenance of the grounds included in the baseball field and surrounding area. If the college wanted to modify the facility, they would have to obtain approval from the city and pay the cost of modification. Councilman Johnson moved for adoption of the ordinance; Councilwoman Wilbanks seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None 30414 -11 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - April 14, 1983 ORDINANCE NO. 3595 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST TO AN AGREEMENT WITH LEE COLLEGE FOR THE JOINT OPERATION OF THE BASEBALL FACILITIES AT W. L. JENKINS MEMORIAL PARK. Consider Proposed Ordinance, Establishing Parking Changes on West Defee Avenue Near the Post Office The proposed changes were worked out with post office officials and have been in effect on a temporary basis for approximately sixty (60) days. The Administration feels that the changes are working as intended and the postmaster is satisfied with the manner in which the changes are working. The Traffic Commission recommended approval of the proposed changes; the Administration concurred. Councilman Philips moved for adoption of the ordinance; Councilman Cannon seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 3596 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS, DESIGNATING A PORTION OF WEST DEFEE AVENUE AS A NO PARKING ZONE; DESIGNATING A PORTION OF WEST DEFEE AVENUE AS A 15 MINUTE PARKING LIMIT ZONE; REPEALING ORDINANCES INCONSISTENT HEREWITH; PRESCRIBING A MAXIMUM PENALTY OF TWO HUNDRED AND N01100 ($200.00) DOLLARS FOR EACH VIOLATION; AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Consider Proposed Ordinance, Establishing Controlled Intersections on East Hunnicutt at Tenth Street and on Crestway Drive at North Burnett Drive The proposed ordinance is a recommendation of the Traffic Commission. The ordinance would establish yield signs on East Hunnicutt at Tenth Street and change the existing yield signs on Crestway at North Burnett to stop signs. Councilman Philips moved for adoption of the ordinance; Councilman Johnson seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 3597 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS, DESIGNATING CRESTWAY DRIVE AT NORTH BURNETT DRIVE AS A STOP INTERSECTION; DESIGNATING EAST HUNNICUTT AT TENTH STREET AS A YIELD INTERSECTION; REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; PRESCRIBING A MAXIMUM PENALTY OF TWO HUNDRED AND N01100 ($200.00) DOLLARS FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. 30414 -12 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - April 12, 1983 Consider Authorizing Reduction of Retainage on Craigmont /Ponderosa Water Line Project Mr. Lanham requested that consideration of this item be delayed. In response to an inquiry from Council, Mr. Lanham stated that some of the problems with sidewalks in the vicinity of Craigmont /Ponderosa were corrected by the contractor, but some of the problems were not caused by the contractor. There have been numerous water line breaks through the years in that area and some of those problems may have been caused by those breaks. Norman Dykes, Director of Public Works /City Engineer, reported that some of the sidewalks are cracked which is typical of many sidewalks in Baytown and normally the city does not correct those type problems unless they become hazardous. All the areas where there was a displacement of some sort which would be a hazard have been repaired. Consider Proposed Resolution No. 836, Authorizing the City Manager to Make a Grant Request to the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department for Acquisition of Park Property The Administration has been working on acquiring park property on Airhart in the vicinity of Lynchburg using Community Development funds. Community Development funds can be used to match other grants. The Administration would like to submit an application to the state for fifty (500) percent of the estimated cost of the land. If the city can get that,'Community Development funds can be used to match that for the purchase of land. The city would, be responsible for development costs. The land purchase would consist of sixteen (16) acres. In response to an inquiry from Council, Mr. Rountree stated that the plans are that this park will be a facility much like Roseland Park - -more of a regional park. Councilman Simmons moved for adoption of the resolution; Councilman Fuller seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None RESOLUTION NO. 836 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN DESIGNATING THE CITY MANAGER AS BEING RESPONSIBLE FOR ACTING FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN IN DEALING WITH THE TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF PARTICIPATING IN THE LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND ACT OF 1965; CERTIFYING THAT THE CITY OF BAYTOWN•IS ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE ASSISTANCE UNDER SUCH PROGRAM; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. 30414 -13 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - April 14, 1983 Consider Approving Proposal to the Houston /Harris County Area Agency for Senior Citizen Program Funding This is also an application from the Parks and Recreation Department for $4,382 for senior citizens softball league, senior citizens celebration and agercise program. The Admin- istration recommended approval of the application. Councilwoman Wilbanks moved to authorize the Administra- tion to make application to the Houston /Harris County Area Agency on Aging for Senior Citizen Program Funding; Councilman Simmons seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None Consent Agenda Since Council had been furnished with a copy of a letter from Environmental Sales and Service, Inc. regarding Consent Agenda Item d, Council decided to look at that item before making a determination if the entire Consent Agenda should be considered as one item. Environmental Sales and Service was one of the bidders on a high velocity sewer cleaner. The Administration had recommended that the bid be awarded to the low bidder, Industrial Disposal Supply. The low bidder's bid met City of Baytown specifications. The staff did check with other cities concerning the Aquatech unit and did receive varying degrees of comment. However, the sales representative for IDS answered to the satisfaction of the staff that the problems with the unit have been corrected and that his company will stand behind the product. Points brought out by Environmental Sales & Service, Inc. included the following: 1. The City of Houston owns six Aquatech units which they are ready to force into a very early retire- ment due to extremely unreliable operation. 2. The City of Houston during the past 24 months has purchased in excess of $30,000 in repair parts through Environmental Sales & Service, Inc. in a vain attempt to keep the unit serviceable. 3. The Gaso pump used by Aquatech is not approved by the manufacturer for the application stated. The manufacturer will not directly warrant the pump because the Aquatech application calls for the pump R.P.M. to greatly exceed manufacturer's sternly recommended specifications. 4. The Aquatech pump sells for approximately $9,000 while our pump sells for approximately $3,500. 30414 -14 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - April 14, 1983 5. The inferior quality of coating on the tank interior has caused the City of Houston to replace two water tanks at great expense. The last replacement tank was quoted at approximately six months out of the factory on an emergency basis. 6. The City of Baytown has never been demonstrated an Aquatech, nor compared the performance to an FMC unit. 7. Only 10 to 12 Aquatechs exist in the Texas municipal market. 8. The FMC unit now in use by the City of Baytown has provided excellent service. Pete Cote, Purchasing Agent, pointed out to Council that only two of the companies that bid met specifications - -IDS and Naylor. The sales representative for IDS was present and addressed the Council with regard to some of the information provided by Environmental Sales and Service, Inc. He stated that the City of Houston has had problems with the Aquatech units as far as service is concerned, as well as follow -up; however, Environmental Sales & Service, Inc. sold these units and have been the servicing agent for the City of Houston on the Aquatech. If the City of Houston has expended $30,000 on parts for the Aquatech, Environmental Sales has made the profits from those sales, not IDS. As far as Aquatech being a new product, IDS has been handling this line for about six months in the State of Texas. The reason that IDS has the product line is because Environmental Sales was cancelled by Aquatech as being a poor distributor for Aquatech. The reason that Aquatech has not been sold in the State of Texas is because Environmental Sales elected not to sell the product over whatever period of years they had it as a product line. The Aquatech is one of the more accepted products in the world. Environmental Sales & Service elected not to sell it because they sell other product lines. IDS has been in business four times longer than Environmental Sales. IDS is the largest distributor of refuse equipment in the Southwest, with major facilities in the City of Houston, City of Plano and Corpus Christi, the home office. IDS offered at its cost a five -year continuous, every two months, maintenance program to the City of Baytown. IDS obtained from the factory a five -year pro -rata warranty on the pump and on the tank and it is generally accepted in the industry that this will be a six -month warranty. In response to an inquiry from Council, the IDS repre- sentative explained that the difference between Aquatech and competition is that Aquatech uses plungers rather than pistons. It is a copy of an oilfield pump which is quite durable. Councilman Cannon stated that it appeared that the Administration had considered this matter carefully and moved to adopt the Consent Agenda. Jack Smith with Environmental Sales and Service was present and requested to be recognized. Mr. Smith requested that Council table the item for further study. He reiterated some of the points presented in the information to Council and pointed out that downtime could be very costly. He also mentioned the fact that it was very difficult to write specifications that all companies could bid. 30414 -15 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - April 14, 1983 Mr. Lanham clarified that the Administration's policy is to recommend low bidder unless that bid does not meet specifications. Councilman Fuller concurred that Council has not always taken low bid and that the Administration has recommended in the past that the low bid not be accepted due to that bid not meeting specifications. Councilman Philips suggested that Council go ahead and consider Item 6, as Councilman Cannon has moved, as part of the Consent Agenda since the item had been properly presented for Council consideration. Councilman Simmons seconded the motion. Councilwoman Wilbanks commented prior to the vote that both the Council and city staff need to hear that the comment has been made "we tried to deal with these people or we did this or we did the other, and felt that it was necessary to come to the City Council." She continued that she felt that this was the type thing that Council would ask Mr. Lanham to see that, from an Administrative standpoint, details like this are followed up on. Regardless of the validity of the statement; the statement has been made. She specifically asked that the Administration do some follow up. Councilwoman Wilbanks said that Council's only options with regard to Item d on the Consent Agenda would be to either reject all bids and rebid or approve the low bidder. However, even a more serious problem which could have a long -term effect is how the bidding process is managed and how we respond to input or questions that are received from others. Councilman Philips concurred. He said that he thought what Councilwoman Wilbanks was asking for was a review of the City's purchasing procedures to make certain that all bidders are fully heard and have an opportunity to talk to anyone that they feel they should to present their views. Mr. Lanham stated that he felt that the gentlemen from Environmental Sales had been listened to, but perhaps the city staff disagreed with their points and he felt that the staff should have that right. Also, he stated that if these gentlemen wanted to submit this letter and raise these questions, this should have been done several days ago to allow the Administration time to check out the comments and make a report to Council. Then the information could have been forwarded to Council along with the agenda information and the Administration could have come to Council with more detailed information. However, for these gentlemen to bring this letter in tonight is an unfair manner in which to deal with the situation. The consent agenda as presented to Council follows: a. Proposed Ordinance No. 30414 -8, will award the bid for the purchase of two - 4" centrifugal trash pumps. We received six responses but only one bid was received. Pump & Power submitted a bid of $6,098. Council has budgeted $4,192.00 for this purchase. We recommend the low bidder, Pump and Power, be awarded this bid. 30414 -16 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - April 14, 1983 b. Proposed Ordinance No. 30414 -9, will award the bid for the annual garbage bag contract. Six (6) bids were received. Bemis Company submitted the low bid of $57,000. Council had budgeted $58,000 for this purchase. The bid by Bemis is $540.00 less than last year's bid price. This is a 1% reduction. This will bring the city's cost down from the current $2.88 per box to $2.85 per box. The City will continue to sell the bags at $3.50 a box. This additional amount will help cover the Administration of the program. We recommend the low bidder, Bemis Company, Inc. be awarded this contract. C. Proposed Ordinance No. 30414 -10, will award the bid for the speaker system for the Council Chamber. Two (2) bids were received. The low bid was submitted by Sterling Commercial Sound in the amount of $5,243.75. Council has budgeted $6,000. for this purchase. We recommend the low bidder, Sterling Commercial Sound, be awarded this contract. d. Proposed Ordinance No. 30414 -11, will award the bid for high velocity sewer cleaner. Five (5) bids were received. Industrial Disposal Supply submitted the low bid of $36,236. Council budgeted $39,636 for this purchase. We recommend the low bidder, Industrial Disposal Supply, be awarded this contract. e. Proposed Ordinance No. 30414 -12, will award the rehabilitation contract for 1124 Daniel Street. Only one bid was received, that was the bid of Prosper Brothers in the amount of $9,599. The office estimate for this rehabilitation was $12,350. We recommend the low bidder, Prosper Brothers, be awarded this contract. f. Proposed Ordinance No. 30414 -13, will award the rehabilitation contract for 400 East Fayle Street. Two (2) bids were received. The low bidder was John Kidd in the amount of $8,130. The office estimate for this rehabilitation was $7,925. We recommend the low bidder, John Kidd, be awarded this contract. g. Proposed Ordinance No. 30414 -14, will award the rehabilitation contract for 1519 Missouri Street. Four (4) bids were received. John Kidd submitted the low bid of $6,385. We recommend the low bidder, John Kidd, be awarded this contract. 30414 -17 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - April 14, 1983 h. Proposed Ordinance No. 30414 -15, will award the rehabilitation contract for 1209 Turner. Only one bid was received; that was the bid of Prosper Brothers in the amount of $9,750. The office estimate for this project was $9,995. We recommend the low bidder, Prosper Brothers, be awarded this contract. i. Enclosed in the agenda packet is a letter from Rafael Ramon requesting water service to a location one - fourth mile west of Goose Creek on the south side of Interstate 10. This location is within Harris County Fresh Water Supply District 1 -A; however this district indicates that they are unable to serve Mr. Ramon with water at that location. Also enclosed in the agenda packet is a letter from Bessie M. Page, Office Manager, Harris County Fresh Water Supply District 1 -A, indicating this. The City of Baytown does have water service in that area. Mr. Ramon has been advised of the various charges involved. We recommend approval of his request. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: Councilman Johnson ORDINANCE NO. 3598 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF PUMP & POWER FOR TWO (2) FOUR INCH CENTRIFUGAL TRASH PUMPS AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF SIX THOUSAND NINETY EIGHT & N01100 ($6,098.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 30414 -8) ORDINANCE NO. 3599 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF BEMIS COMPANY, INC. FOR THE ANNUAL GARBAGE BAG CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF FIFTY SEVEN THOUSAND & N01100 ($57,000.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 30414 -9) ORDINANCE NO. 3600 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF STERLING COMMERCIAL SOUND FOR A SPEAKER SYSTEM FOR THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF FIVE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED FORTY THREE & 75/100 ($5,243.75) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 30414 -10) 30414 -18 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - April 14, 1983 ORDINANCE NO. 3601 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL SUPPLY FOR A HIGH VELOCITY SEWER CLEANER AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF THIRTY SIX THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED THIRTY SIX AND N01100 ($36,236.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 30414 -11) ORDINANCE NO. 3602 AN ORDINANCE AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT #82 -03 -10 TO PROSPER BROTHERS FOR THE SUM OF NINE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED NINETY NINE & N01100 ($9,599.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 30414 -12) ORDINANCE NO. 3603 AN ORDINANCE AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT #82 -04 -11 TO JOHN KIDD FOR THE SUM OF EIGHT THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED THIRTY & N01100 ($8,130.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 30414 -13) ORDINANCE NO. 3604 AN ORDINANCE AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT #82 -04 -12 TO JOHN KIDD FOR THE SUM OF SIX THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED EIGHTY FIVE & N01100 ($6,385.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 30414 -14) ORDINANCE NO. 3605 AN ORDINANCE AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT 082 -03 -13 TO PROSPER BROTHERS FOR THE SUM OF NINE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTY & N01100 ($9,750.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 30414 -15) For bid tabulations, see Attachments "B" through "F." Consider Appointment to Clean City Commission Councilman Cannon moved to appoint Mark Hall to fill an unexpired term on the Clean City Commission; Councilman Johnson seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None Consider Appointment to Urban Rehabilitation Standards Review Board Councilman Philips moved to appoint C. W. (Bill) Lubbock to the Urban Rehabilitation Standards Review Board in the position of Registered Engineer; Councilman Fuller seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None 30414 -19 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - April 14, 1983 Consider Appointment to Baytown Appraisal Review Board Councilman Philips moved to appoint Joe Muller to serve a term of one year on the Baytown Appraisal Review Board; Councilman Johnson seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None Recess into Executive Session to Discuss Contemplated Litigation Mayor Hutto recessed the open meeting into executive session to discuss contemplated litigation. When the open meeting reconvened the following business was transacted: Consider Approval of Proposed Settlement of Claim with American Title Councilman Johnson moved to approve the proposed settle- ment of claim with American Title; Councilman Philips seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None Adjourn There being no further business to be transacted, the meeting was adjourned. Eileen P. Hall, City Clerk PREMIUM SUMMARY BY LINE OF INSURANCE Present First Alexander Coverage Gallagher TML Boti Agency & Alexander Lucas Property Insurance $116,603 - min. (Bldgs & Conts) $ 56,033 $209,603 - max. $ 18,886(1) $ 20,279 $ 25,547 $ 20,642 $ 21,626 Contractors Equipment & Floater Items 3,836 Included 3,174 2,778 3,624 Included 3,470 Boiler & Machinery 313 450 414 171 414 345 No Quote EDP Included 1,094 1,119 3,719 4,941 No Quote General Liability (2) 54,293 Included 101,266 32,637 28,031 26,739 52,321 Auto Liability & Physical Damage {2) 56,602 Included 56,421 72,620 97,518 76,883 122,224 Public Officials Liability None 12,462 11,626 3,074 5,875 4,619 No Quote Law Enforcement Liability None Included 11,775 23,393 16,450 23,488 No Quote Crime 942 Included 3,050 1,675 1,744 1,597 No Quote Umbrella Liability None Included 12,300 12,610 30_800^ 27,500 No Quote TOTAL $172,019 $129,515 - min. $222,951 $170,356 $213,722 $186,754 vE > $205,641 $220,015 - max. � � (2) The TML quote does not include the cost of flood insurance, which would be extra. ' ( ) Premiums for general liability reflect an experience credit of 65%, and*for auto v � liability credit of 31% R � iH( Qii COMPANY Attachment "B" )i z o -c D C> • '0 C m o •~t C Co ..c k Q r�> I N �? W v 'z r ' o a n z ' ' v m n -Zi O Lq O c v vs 3 n d G7 NI��1 G lOD h � P~'1 -o W O c • N O V M 40 �XD z m z •• Cn o O.� o q-•f W its Co I I Co r w v N 'O �3 I• y 1 !y C11 M z -i c c� D a N 2 3 • f- -- •- - -.... _. M v ri�z, W 2 )i z o -c D C> • '0 C 0 z o -c D C> '0 C m o •~t C Co ..c k r�> I �? W v 'z O ' o t z z 0 k o0 v 'z O ' t O O Lq O C v vs 3 NI��1 "{ lOD h � P~'1 W O O V O z o O.� Q w a r N 1 co _ N W 4- W f-7 00 r z W V -� -n C • N G7 n A Ln m o r c0i ;a � m -� c 0 i nni D n r•G) r 3 1 m �7 N• 3 a O LA ~3 0o(A 0 m \� �V i ' • N � N r • ' M i l C h ' R t+ oC i= 1 i ._ �2 N O �i M z a In co � 4 m N 0 M O b C rn — o o z C h ' R t+ oC i= 1 i ._ CITY 0W BAYTOW N ANNUAL GARBAGE .BAG CONTRACT B1D TABULATION t: #833 -49 , -MARCH 30, 1983 2:00 P.M. BEMIS COMPANY B 8 E PACKAGING POLY- AMERICA CHICAGO TRANS. ADAMS IND. �1 QTY DESCRIPTION UNIT XTENDEO UNIT I EXTENDED UN1 X ENO ED UNIT EX�'EuZ) 0 U.::T I E%���� *� R p r c I MICE pairr p Pf r: - 1 ANNUAL GARBAGE BAG CONTRACT, per , I I specifications. i I 1,000,000 2 mil Plastic Garbage Bags; 50 $57.00M 57,000.00 64.97/m 64,970.00 65.12/m 65,120.00 61.24/m 61,236.00 57.28/m 57,280.00 ! bags per box w /closures 1 I TOTAL: $57,000-00 $64,970.00 $65,120.00 $61,236.00 i$57,280.00 DELIVERY: 30 DAY AS SPECIFIE 30 DAYS AS SPECIFIED 30 DAY AS SPECIFIE 30 DAY AS SPECIFIE 30 DAYS AS SPEC. I i v � I �s - 4 a 1 1 r GROSS TOTAL - - LESS DISC. _ ?F- O r im c F 4 0 I 00 a 00 w w r I •o D G7 m D z z c a r c� D W D c� m D 0 0 z D� n -1 Da z z A o� C z�. D r d D � a c� m o -� z O C2 o a m •• • W Or N O a% �C z O ? a m n} wv 1014 O •� T Q` -i r►(D W w `z� S N In 'r1 O O f'1 v o 0 3 v� t rl F 4 0 I 00 a 00 w w r I •o D G7 m D z z c a r c� D W D c� m D 0 0 z D� n -1 Da A o� z�. TL �;�, SnPrl kPr SvctPm fir f n��nri 1 1`hamhc�rs � �: t�833 -45 �T�= _ _' M rc 21.,_,,, 193 .r•�r �.rw.a...••r�r��.s�••sn� -tit QTY DESCRIPTION G:t'1' Y V � %a Y -ro � N f�ID TABULAT101U Sterlin Comm. .unrr xTErvoEO unr r pcTFNoEO uN1T PRfC£� PR►CE _- nAfC�' PRICE f'' 3 Mixers � 514. � 1542.00 641.25 1923.75 1 Am lifier - P 362. � 362.00 438.75 1 438.75 I i 12 � Microphone I I39. ! 1668.00 I 188.44 I 2261.75 � 1 j Racks mounts -amps Inc. � Inc. 38.25 � 38.25 3 Racks mounts =mixer 29.95 89.$5 38.25 114.75 2 Jack w /wll mount � 9.90 .19.80 16.50 33.00 � 2 Plugs- 4.00 8.00 6.50 13.00 j� � I00 ft. .3 cable conductor 12.00t 12.00' .90 90.00 � 10 New flex for microphones i 19.001 190.00 11.75 � 117.50 i. � 2 Microphones -w table stands 131.00 262.00 232.69 � 465.38 __" Miscellaneous Hardware 300.00 300.00 123.00 123.00 �, a Labor 790.00 790.00 510.00 510.00 TOTAL: 5243.65 6129.13 Delivery 45 days del. �'� 20 day del . GROSS TDTAL LASS . D1 SC. N,cl" 7"OT�� L �.... ' N01 PFfC' � l � t � .�. � I C A I' ^ ^ p � /' C �a�'' I 1 � � I I �- i i I 1 j� 1 I GIrY 0� �AY-ro�� -L �: High Velocuty Sewer Cleaner �1D „�AB�LQ.i,..l �� � • �M Gi���i1JJ .....�.�+•.�.rar.�� 7-E.March 22, 1983 2:00 pm. w � i ��r ti; Q 7" Y DES C R ! PTION •-�°` � � • ^ urv,r ���.�:: �� , L °r _ - -- u'.: r��c��,,, .uN,r FxrFNo�o � v �rlr � e� FHo�o uN1 x No o I 1 High Velocity Sewer $38,354.00 36,657.00 $48,;083:�i0 � 41,886.13 141,688. Cleaner optionali X579.00} alt. 50,656.00 � l 1 I' � 36,236.00 � , � � i I Delivery ' 90 days'ARO 60 -90 Da s ARO 120 d«ys`ARO 60 days ARO 90 days: ARO Warranty �' lyr. or .12,000 180 days 1 12 mo or 12,000 lyr or 1 ,000 miles mile mile Maintenance 37.50 rafter Syr limi ed � 37.50 tour 35.00 per hr. � � warra� ty. period � , � � 1 �� . �� , - .� U � ,,� I J � _ _ - CROSS ror,�L ��s rsc. . 1V�T T.a L I I Lt: Vvnunun I [y vevc 1vFnncnL 3 I D: #27 )ATE. April 5, 1983 BID TABULATION Prosper Bros. .John Kidd Ed Shook Buck Bishop UNIT EXrr_iv0E0. UNIT EXTENDED UNIT Ek7CRUDED UNf XY TEM QTY DESCRIPTION