The URL can be used to link to this page

1983 03 10 CC Minutes30310 -1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN March 10, 1983 The City Council of the City of Baytown, Texas, met in regular session on Thursday, March 10, 1983, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the Baytown City Hall with the follow- ing attendance: Fred T. Philips Jimmy Johnson Perry M. Simmons Mary E. Wilbanks Roy L. Fuller Allen Cannon Emmett 0. Hutto Fritz Lanham Larry Patterson Randy Strong Eileen P. Hall Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilman Mayor City Manager Assistant City Manager City Attorney City Clerk The meeting was called to order with a quorum present, and the invocation was offered, afterwhich the following business was conducted: Minutes Councilman Philips clarified that with respect to the support of legislation to allow General Law cities to appoint persons who reside outside the city limits would have no effect on home -rule cities. Councilman Philips moved to approve the minutes for the meeting held February 24, 1983; Councilwoman Wilbanks seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Wilbanks, Fuller Mayor Hutto Nays: None Receive Petitions Philips, Johnson, Simmons, and Cannon No petitions were presented. City Manager's Report Inspection and Permit Report for February - The total for the first two months of 1983 is about $11,025,000 compared to less than $6,000,000 for the first two months of 1982. The inspection department has issued 44 single family residential permits compared to 18 at this time last year. Since the first of March, 14 more single family residential permits have been issued. Perhaps this is an indication of a recovery in the economy. 30310 -2 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 10, 1983 Councilman Philips inquired in this respect, if the inspection department is sufficiently staffed. Mr. Lanham responded that the staff members of this department have been cross - trained to help in other areas when necessary. At the present time, work is being inspected in a timely fashion. Councilman Philips suggested that should the need arise, the Administration may want to consider hiring contract help. Annual update of land use, population and growth figures for Baytown - Council had been furnished with a copy of the annual update of land use, population and growth figures for Baytown which population figure for the end of December, 1980 was 57,600 compared to end of December, 1982 figure of 59,635. The growth rate has slowed some, but Baytown is continuing to grow. Legislation affecting annexation rights of coastal cities - The Administration had received a letter from the City of Port Arthur requesting assistance concerning the proposed legislation which would affect the rights of coastal cities of Galveston, Corpus Christi, and Port Arthur to annex to the State boundary into the Gulf of Mexico. Council expressed no opposition to the Administration writing a letter in opposition to the proposed legislation. Chamber of Commerce extended an invitation to Council to meet with a group on a promotional visit from Galveston at 9:15 a.m. on March 22. Drainage - A map was posted in the Council Chamber which depicted progress being made with regard to the drainage priority list approved by Council. Areas shown in red have been completed, while areas shown in yellow are now in progress and blue areas are those on which work has not begun. Changes which have occurred since the last Council meeting include the completion of Mapleton, the beginning of work on East Francis and the near completion of work on Carriage Lane, Lantern Lane, and Dayton. Work on Surrey Lane has just begun and the survey work has been performed on Greenwood. North Burnet is about 25% complete. The plans for the super ditch have been forwarded to the City's engineering department for minor changes. Those changes have been made and the plans will be forwarded to the County next week. Sliplining - The contractor has completed installation of the line in Roseland Oaks and the other areas east of Highway 146. A semi -final inspection has been performed. The contractor is in the process of leveling mounds of dirt where excavation was made and that work should be complete within a few days. Water Line in Craigmont /Ponderosa - All service connections have been made. The old fire hydrants and valve boxes have been removed. The only work that remains is concrete repairs. ' Sliplining in Lakewood - During the month of February, Naylor, which is one of the two contractors working in that area, sliplined 3600 linear feet of 6 -inch line. Progress has been rather slow during that month because of poor weather conditions and the illness of the crew. The other 30310 -3 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 10, 1983 contract is with Reynolds and under emergency conditions, Reynolds sliplined 710 feet of an existing 12 -inch line. Reynolds was issued a change order at the last Council meeting for about $63,000 worth of work, but that work has not yet begun. Questions /Comments of Council Councilman Cannon mentioned that the bill regarding changes to the Civil Service Statute, 1269m, has been intro- duced with some significant items: (1) appointments may be made by the chief with approval of Council to the second level and (2) there is no grandfather provision in the proposed act. The wording of the act is not clear with regard to what permanent disability means. Therefore, Councilman Cannon stated that he was not pleased with the proposed bill. Mr. Lanham stated that the bill was probably introduced the way in which it was originally proposed and that there would be many changes made during committee review. Mayor Hutto stated that Representative Watson had forwarded communication to the City Manager which stated that the proposed bill was in negotiating stages. Councilman Cannon requested that an item in this regard be placed on the next Council agenda in the event Council would want to take action. He felt that perhaps at that time the bill would be out of committee. Councilman Philips stated that he had attended a presentation concerning U. S. Savings Bond and would like to see the City of Baytown offer this program to its employees. The U. S. Savings Bond Program of today is nothing like the program of yesterday. Today, the program is a sound financial investment. Mr. Lanham stated that Richard Hare, Personnel Director, would be attending a conference in May on this same topic and the staff would be checking into the possibilities. Mayor Hutto commended the Public Works Department for the manner in which the employees performed during the making of water taps. He mentioned that the area was left in better condition by the crew than prior to commencing work. Consider Proposed Resolution No. 833, Authorizing Amendment of the Articles of Incorporation of the Southeast Texas Housing Finance Corporation City Attorney, Randy Strong, explained that the Southeast Texas Housing Finance Corporation was created a couple years ago to provide some financing for housing development similar to what the Baytown Housing Finance Corporation was created to do for Baytown. The Southeast Texas Housing Finance Corporation was created to serve a much larger area and includes other counties and cities. One of the problems that has developed is that there are numerous other counties and cities that desire to participate in this and in order to make it easier to bring these new units into the corporation, one of the amendments being proposed to the articles of incorporation would give the Board of this group the authority to bring in 30310 -4 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 10, 1983 these new governmental units without having to go back and amend the articles each time and receive approval from existing units. Also, the amendments would allow the Board to drop cities and counties that no longer want to participate without having to amend the articles of incorporation. Another change would allow any governmental unit to choose either to participate or not to participate in any residential development program. The old articles of incorporation did not provide what would transpire if the corporation were to be dissolved. The change proposes that the assets will go to the governmental units on a prorated basis by population. One other change that was made necessary due to amendment to the Internal Revenue Code that was passed just this last year, is that in order for the bonds issued by this corporation to be considered tax exempt the code now provides that the bond issue must be approved by the governmental unit which issues the obligation or the governmental unit on behalf of which such obligation was issued. For instance, if the corporation wants to issue a series of bonds to build some sort of project in the Baytown area, in order for those to be tax exempt, the issue would have to be approved by the City of Baytown. Therefore, an article was added which states that the purpose of public approval requirement, whenever bonds are issued for a program physicially within one governmental area, those bonds will be considered as having been issued only on behalf of that.sponsoring subdivision. By doing that the corporation will not have to go back and get approval of all other participating entities. In response to an inquiry from Council, the City Attorney stated that State statute that allows creation of this corporation is very specific in saying that the cities and counties that approve the organization of this corporation shall in no way be liable for any of the bonded indebtedness either morally or legally and specifically prohibits cities from paying anything on these bonds. In response to an inquiry from Council, Mr. Lanham stated that the Nolan Road project is a rent subsidy program. Councilman Cannon inquired if any public assistance housing could be financed under this corporation. Mr. Eiland responded that no public assistance housing could be financed under this corporation without the prior consent of the City Council. What HUD has done on 100% federally assisted projects is to make it possible under 11B Financing for Housing Authorities fcr the creation by a housing authority of its own non- profit corporation. Councilman Cannon commented that that is exactly what happened on Nolan Road. Mr. Eiland responded that that provision would be the same for any project whether subsidized or non - subsidized, but before this can be done the approval of the governing body of that political subdivision must be obtained. Councilwoman Wilbanks inquired under what circumstances would the Board wish to remove a governmental unit. If a governmental unit desires to be removed for any reason, the Board could approve that removal without going to each of the various participating units for approval. Councilwoman Wilbanks then inquired if a governmental unit would need to request removal in order for the Board to act since it appeared that the Board could act independently to remove a 30310 -5 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 10, 1983 governmental unit. The response indicated that the Board could act to remove a governmental unit without that unit's request for removal. Mr. Lanham pointed out that a city may wish to withdraw for the reason that that city would have none of the housing units that have been financed through this and have no reason to be a party. He could see no other reason that a unit would want to withdraw or would be allowed to withdraw. If the unit has housing that has been financed through the corporation, he felt that that unit should not be allowed to withdraw. Mr. Eiland stated that a unit cannot withdraw with respect to any specific program that is presently being operated; however, the unit could withdraw from future programs. Councilman Cannon clarified that this type program enabled persons residing in the H -GAC region to finance their first home or a home if they haven't been a homeowner for the past three years, at some 2% below the market rate. He then inquired if there has been any opposition from the savings and loans. Mr. Eiland responded that there has been no opposition from the savings and loans. Councilman Cannon inquired if there is to be a sale of bonds for the Baytown area would Baytown City Council be required to give its approval prior to that sale. Mr. Eiland responded in the affirmative, but clarified that this approval would be for apartment complexes. Single family residences would be region -wide, but should a city elect not to participate in a single family program for some reason, that city could withdraw from that specific single family program, but still be part of the corporation. Councilman Philips inquired if the Southeast Texas Housing Finance Corporation published an annual report. Mr. Eiland responded that an audit is being performed at the present time. Councilman Philips requested that Council be provided with a copy of that audit report. Mr. Eiland stated that Council would receive a copy of the audit. Mr. Eiland stated that since single family residences had been discussed he would like to report that in the State of Texas corporations such as the Southeast Texas Housing Finance Corporation could only sell so many thousands of dollars in single family mortgage revenue bonds in a particular year. In the first allocation, preference was given to the housing finance corporation which did not have bond sales last year; therefore, the Southeast Texas Housing Finance Corporation was not allocated funds at that time, but those who did receive funding have only 45 days in which to get their program sold. That date is March 14 and anything that is still out- standing will be re- allocated so there is a possibility for another single family program. Based on the present market situation, on a 30 -year mortgage there would probably be a mortgage rate of 10 1/2% or 10 3/4 %. Under the Baytown Housing Finance Corporation, there have been two programs and under the Southeast Texas Housing Finance Corporation, there have been two. Under the Baytown Housing Finance Corporation, the funds were allocated rather quickly. However, 30310 -6 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 10, 1983 in June or July, 1982, the interest rates began to drop which caused some of the rates to drop below what the housing corporations have out; therefore, if interest rates do not increase, then any money not used for mortgages will be used to pay off the bonds. The Administration recommended approval of the resolution. Councilman Philips moved for approval of the resolution; Councilman Fuller seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: Councilwoman Wilbanks RESOLUTION NO. 833 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN APPROVING AND REQUESTING THE AMENDMENT OF THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF THE SOUTHEAST TEXAS HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION. Consider Proposed Ordinance, Authorizing a Contract with Harris County for Jail Services Approval of the contract will continue the present contract for another year with the exception of an increase in the amount that Harris County will be paying for this service. Last year, the county paid $71,000 versus $73,400 for this year. The Administration feels that this is a good arrangement for the county and the City of Baytown. The Administration recommended approval. Councilman Johnson moved for adoption of the ordinance; Councilman Cannon seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 3577 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST TO A CONTRACT V.ITH HARRIS COUNTY PROVIDING FOR JOINT PARTICIPATION BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE COUNTY WITH REGARD TO THE FURNISHING, MAINTENANCE, AND OPERATION OF JOINT JAIL FACILITIES; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Consider Proposed Ordinance, Authorizing a Contract with Harris County for Fire Service in County The proposed contract is based on the same formula that has been in existence for the past several years and at the same rate as cities have been paid in the past. The base rate which all the cities and volunteer fire departments in Harris County receive is $500 a month or $6,000. Structural fires are paid on the basis of $50 per run; non - structural fires, 30310 -7 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 10, 1983 $25; emergency responses, $5 and mutual aid, $50. The payment that the City of Baytown would receive in 1983 is based on the number of runs that were made last year which were 91. By using this formula, the result is that the City of Baytown would be paid $8,210. Councilman Philips stated that from all indications, it appeared that the City of Baytown was being paid approxi- mately $100 per run and each time city equipment was dispatched, the city had to pay gasoline and whatever wear and tear on the vehicle. Mr. Lanham stated that there would be potential for damage to vehicles and if necessary, foam would be utilized. Councilman Philips stated that he felt that the City was not being reasonably compensated for this service. Councilman Cannon concurred with Councilman Philips and stated that he had been concerned about the formula and method of reimbursement on this contract. He acknowledged that the county pays fair reimbursement on the jail contract and that the county does take care of county roads. However, citizens of Baytown do pay county taxes for which they should expect services. *Councilwoman Wilbanks no longer present. Councilman Fuller pointed out that the county is not utilizing the correct information on which to base its formula. The county is utilizing 1982 information rather than projecting what the increase could be for 1983. Mr. Lanham pointed out that the figures may actually decrease as Baytown annexes northward. Councilman Philips pointed out that although Baytown may be annexing northward, population density is increasing. He also mentioned that during the City of Baytown's budget process, Council attempted to attain the most efficient utili- zation of City of Baytown taxpayers' dollars. By approving this contract, the Council is not achieving the most for the citizens of Baytown. He felt that the county should be charged on the same basis that the City of Baytown charges itself to provide fire service. Councilman Simmons commented that Fire Marshal Pruitt had indicated that he had placed $500,000 in his budget to take care of 48 contracts like this one. Councilman Cannon stated that he did not want to set a policy of not running fire calls in the county, but he would like to put the county on notice that next year if a signifi- cant improvement is not made in the contract payment, it will be the county's decision not to cover its people. However, he emphasized that he could never discontinue fire service, even if the city never received payment. He did feel, however, that this contract should be on a business basis with more realistic figures. Mayor Hutto pointed out that the county budget has been adopted for this year and therefore, there would be no possibility to make a change. However, if Council so desired, the Administration could write a letter requesting that this be placed in next year's budget. He pointed out that overall the county expended a great amount of money within the city limits of Baytown which he would not want to jeopardize over this $8,200. 30310 -8 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 10, 1983 Mr. Lanham pointed out that the City of Houston in 1981 received $7,960 which is an indication that they are being paid on the same basis as the City of Baytown. Councilman Philips stated that the bottom line on the article which appeared in Texas Towns and Cities is that that situation needs to be corrected. Councilman Philips moved to adopt the ordinance with the stipulation that a letter be written to notify the county that the calls are costing the city 91 times what the city's average cost is and that that should be taken into account next year. Councilman Johnson seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 3578 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST TO A CONTRACT WITH HARRIS COUNTY WITH REGARD TO PROVIDING FIRE FIGHTING AND FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES TO UNINCORPORATED AREAS OF HARRIS COUNTY AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Consider Proposed Ordinance, Authorizing Final Payment to National Fence Company for Construction of Westwood Little League Park Fencing This contractor has worked very hard to have the job completed prior to the Council meeting, but could only manage to have the job 95% complete. The job will be completed in time for the little league season to begin on time. This is a lump sum payment contract; therefore, the Admin- istration recommended that Council authorize payment of the full amount, $17,540.78 upon completion. The original contract was for $17,844; therefore, there is a small underrun of the contract. Councilman Cannon moved to adopt the ordinance; Council- man Fuller seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 3579 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING FINAL PAYMENT TO NATIONAL FENCE COMPANY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF WESTWOOD LITTLE LEAGUE PARK FENCING, AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. M 30310 -9 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 10, 1983 Consent Agenda Mayor Hutto stated that the Consent Agenda would be considered as one item unless a member of Council desired to remove an item. Mr. Lanham mentioned that there was an individual in the audience who wished to speak to Consent Agenda Item c. Richard Clark with Baytown Oil Sales, addressed Council concerning the manner in which the proposed Annual Oil & Grease Contract would be awarded. The Administration had recommended that the contract be awarded on an item per item basis as to the low bidders. Mr. Clark felt that the contract should be awarded according to the low bidders on the two major sections rather than on an item per item basis. Mr. Clark mentioned that if the City wished to award on a per item basis to the low bidder, he was low bidder on Item 14. Mr. Clark stated that the specifications should be more closely scrutinized since the city had requested items be supplied in quantities that were not the usual. Councilman Philips moved to adopt the ordinance providing that Baytown Oil Sales be awarded the low bid for Item 14; Councilman Johnson seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 3580 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF GULF OIL CO., BAYTOWN OIL SALES; CHICKERING OIL; AND PACER LUBRICANTS FOR THE ANNUAL OIL AND GREASE CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF EIGHTEEN THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED EIGHT & N01100 ($18,708.00) DOLLARS. For tabulation, see Attachment "A." Council then considered the Consent Agenda Items a, b, d and a as follows: a. Proposed Ordinance No. 30310 -5, will award the bid for the purchase of a 6 inch centrifugal pump. Seven bids were received, three of which were no bids. The low bidder meeting specifications was Naylor Supply ($17,498). Council has budgeted $16,600 for this purchase. We recommend Naylor Supply be awarded this contract. '* b. Proposed Ordinance No. 30310 -6, will award the annual ready mix concrete contract. Four (4) bids were received, two of which were no bids. Texas G & B Concrete submitted the low bid of $15,585. We recommend the low bidder, Texas G & B Concrete, be awarded this contract. 30310 -10 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 10, 1983 d. Proposed Ordinance No. 30310 -8, will award the annual asbestos - cement pipe contract. Two bids were received, one of which was a no bid. Utility Supply Company submitted the low bid of $11,829.07. We recommend the low bidder, Utility Supply Company, be awarded this contract. e. Proposed Ordinance No. 30310 -9, will award the contract for hot mix - cold lay asphalt. One bid was received. Radcliff Materials submitted the low bid of $14,475. We recommend the low bidder, Radcliff Materials Company, be awarded this contract. Councilman Johnson moved to adopt the Consent Agenda Items a, b, d and e; Councilman Simmons seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 3581 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF NAYLOR SUPPLY FOR A 6" CENTRIFUGAL PUMP AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF SEVENTEEN THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED NINETY EIGHT & N01100 ($17,498.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 30310 -5) ORDINANCE NO. 3582 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF TEXAS G & B CONCRETE FOR THE ANNUAL READY MIX CONCRETE CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF FIFTEEN THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED EIGHTY FIVE AND N01100 ($15,585.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 30310 -6) ORDINANCE NO. 3583 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF UTILITY SUPPLY CO. FOR THE ANNUAL ASBESTOS- CEMENT PIPE CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF ELEVEN THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED TWENTY NINE & 07/100 ($11,829.07) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 30310 -8) ORDINANCE NO. 3584 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF RADCLIFF MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL HOT MIX -COLD LAY ASPHALT CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF FOURTEEN THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED SEVENTY FIVE & N01100 ($14,475.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 30310 -9) For tabulations, see Attachments "B" through "E." 30310 -11 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 10, 1983 Consider Appointments to Community Development Advisory Board Council was not prepared to make these appointments. Consider Appointment to Clean City Commission Council was not prepared to make this appointment. Consider Appointments to Urban Rehabilitation Standards Review Board Councilman Fuller moved to reappoint William J. Gidley and J. R. (Bob) Boyd to the Urban Rehabilitation Standards Review Board and to appoint Reverend Frank A. Boutwell to serve on the Board in the position of minister. Councilman Cannon seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None Recess and Reconvene Mayor Hutto recessed the open meeting into executive session to discuss pending litigation. When the open meeting reconvened, the following business was transacted: Consider Proposed Ordinance, Approving Contract with Harris County Flood Control for Land Acquisition The proposed ordinance would approve a contract between the City of Baytown and Harris County Flood Control District which would enable the city to acquire right of way for a drainage ditch in the vicinity of Rollingbrook Extension and provides for the county to reimburse the city. The Adminis- tration recommended approval of the ordinance. Councilman Philips moved for adoption of the ordinance; Councilman Johnson seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None AN ORDINANCE AND THE CITY COUNTY FLOOD PROPERTY IN HEREOF. ORDINANCE NO. 3585 AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE CLERK TO ATTEST TO A CONTRACT WITH HARRIS CONTROL DISTRICT FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN BAYTOWN: AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE There being no further business to be transacted, the meeting was adjourned. Eileen P. Hall, City Clerk T! T�; `: • ANNUAL 01 L s GREASE 3 ! D � � -�-�?- • 'February 15, 1983 2:00 P.M. `?ATE• _� .,.,. GrrY 0� �AY-ro�N 81D TABULAT101V Attachment "A" TEti1 QTY DESCRIPTION GULF 0 CO I ' . ,>�, xrF,voi:o r�r,T� Ex FNoEO un,1r x Ho o . un►r�T� ExTp.�• =`o ;z R P , ^��`�� I a,'.' I. POLICE, PUBLIC WORKS, PARKS S REC ! 2 cases H.D. Motor Oil, 20 wt. 3.18 8.16 3.08 * 36.96 19.90 39.80 21.42 � 42.84 j 40 cases H.D. Motor Oil, 30 wt. 3.18 763.20 3.08 * 739.20 19.90 796.00 21.42 � 856.80 • 20 drums N.D. Motor Oil, 30 wt. 2.68 9 .00 2.83 * 3,113.00 159.95 3,199.00 � 174.55 j 3,491.00 25 cases H.D. Motor Oil, 40 wt. 3.18 77.00 3.08 � * 462.00 19.90 497.50 21.42 535.50 ; �. i 15 drums ; H.D. Motor Oil, 40 wt. 2.68 �2,2 .00 2.83 � 2,334.75 159.95 2,399.25 •. 174.55 2,618.25 �. � 15 drums I Solvent NO � B 1.93 � * 1,592.25 109.45 1,641.75 110.00 1,650.00 �, 42 cases � Multi- Purpose Grease Cartridge 7..76 i 2 2 20.13 * 422.73 8.28 347.16 NO BID �, 1 drum Multi- Purpose Gear Oil 3.86 � .55 * 66.00 120.00 120.00 NO � BID �, 4 drums Multi - Purpose Gear Oil 3.31 728.20 .48 * 768.00 189.60 0 NO � BID I 0. 2 tubs Extreme Pressure Lithium Grease .705 9.36 .64 * 44.80 21.95 43.90 NO BID 1. 29 cases Multi- Viscosity 1Ow40 •- 4.13 718.62 4.49 * 781.26 19.96 57 4 � 23.5b 683.24 2. 12 drums Multi- Viscosity 1Ow40 3.63 2,395.80 4.24 * 2,798.40 163.50 1,9 2.00 199.85 2,398.20 3. 26 cases Automatic Transmission Fluid NO e1D '4.02 * 313.56 11.95 310.70. 15.06 391.56 '4. � 5 cases Automatic Transmission Fluid 3:51 •lOS.30 3.54 * 106.20 17.95 89.75 22.98 114.90 I 5. � 1 drum Automatic Transmission Fluid 3.01 165.55 � 3.29 * 180.95 198.60 1 8.60 � 185.55 � 185.55 6. � 6 cases Automatic Transmission Fluid 3.51 � 126.36 3.54 � * 127.44 17.95 107.70 � 22.98 ; 137.88 7. 5 drums Automatic Transmission Fluid 3.01 827.75 3.29 •rr * 904.75 189.60 9 .00 185.55 � 927.75 18. ' 6 cases Tractor Fluid NO i 3.51- i * 126.36 23.04; 138.24 � NO i BID 19. s 16 drums Tractor Fluid 2,91 2 560.3 3:26 � * 2,868.80 165.95' 2•,655.20 197.10 3,153.60 !0. lb drums H.J. Hydraulic Fluid 2.47 2,173. 0 2.40 * 2,191.20 143.90 2,302.40 NO j BID i II. FIP.E DEPARTMENT I. 4 drums Texaco Ursa 3 2.78 * 611.60 NO BID • 175.00 700.00 NO BID ( DRUM DEPOSITS: _ 55 gallon drum deposit 20.00 NO DEPOS T 20.00 20.00 55 gallon drum return charge 20.00 � 20.00 20.00 *Does not meet specs. *Does no meet specs. Not Texa Ursa 3 Failure t agree to � � �+c�n�c Tr1Tn � Drice revision clause. •. LEGS D1S� $17,287.98 519,978.61 $19,834.79.. $17,187.07 - N- TOTAL - ,� t� �� 2 DAYS ARO 2 DAYS ARO 2 DAYS ARO 1 TL �: - •ANNUAL 0 I � S GREASE CONTRACT CONTINUED PAGE 2 31 �: X832-37 ��1--�. . February 15, 1983 2:00 P.M. GIrY 0� t3A Y-ro r� nr • �31D TA$ULATlON . r�lti� Q r� . DESCRIP?'lON • .unr� xrr:Ko�o �,• r unrlr a NoEO r v+w k o uN1 EXTE: +v�J � r� ur.: r �z: � :: ..a.�c I Q:�: 2 cases 1. POLICE, PUBLIC WORKS, PARKS � R H.D. Motor Oil, 20 wt. 11.49 45.96 19.45 38.90 24.00 48.00 I � . 40 cases H.D. Motor Oil, 30 wt. 11.49 919.20 19.45 778.00 24.00 960.00 20 drums H.D. Motor Oil, 30 wt. 151.25 3,025.00 156.75 3,135.00 175.00 3,500.00. I 25 cases •H.D. Motor Oil, k0 wt. 11.49 574.50 19.45 � 486.25 24.00 600.00 t IS drums ;H. D. Motor Oil, 40 wt. 151.25 1 2,268.75 156.75 2 2 175.00: 2,625.00 15 drums 1Solvent NO ' BID 107.25 �. 08.•7 143.00 2,145.00 � 42 cases Multi- Purpose Grease Cartridge 8.67 i i 433.50 23.45 84 .20 45.00 1,890.00 I1 drum `Multi- Purpose Gear Oil 66.82 133.64 63.60 254.40 70.00 70.00 4 drums Multi- Purpose Gear Oil 218.18 872.72 184.00 736.00 225.00 900.00 D. 2 tubs Extreme Pressure Lithium Grease 25.16 50.32 33.60 67.20 45.00 90.00 1. 29 cases Multi- Viscosity 1Ow40 �' 12.51 725.58 20.45 593.00 � '25.00 725.00 2•. 12 drums Multi - Viscosity 1Ow40 215.62 2,587.44 163.35 1,960.20 220.00 2,640.00 ;. 26 cases Automatic Transmission Fluid 20.04 521.04 NO BID 17.73 460.98 4. 1 5 cases Automatic Transmission Fluid 20.04 19.98 99.90 25.00 125.00 5. � 1 drum Automatic Transmission Fluid '157:50 1 � 160.60 160.60 190.00 190.00 5. � 6 cases Automatic Transmission Fluid � 20.04 0.24 19.98 � 119.88 NO BID � 1. � 5 drums Automatic Transmission Fluid 150.62 � 753.10 160.66 803.00 175.00 875.00 ! g. � 6 cases i. i 16 drums Tractor -Fluid Tractor Fluid NO 169.37 { B1 2,709.92 •18.60 163.35, � 0. 2,613.60 NO 185.00j � BID 2,960.00 } �. 16 drums H.D. Hydraulic Fluid 143.75 2,300.00 147.40 2,358.40 •160.00' 2;560.00 i � 11. FIRE DEPARTMENT ( ' 1 4 drums Texaco Ursa 3 166.87 667.48 156.75 * 627.00 187.00 748.00 - DRUM DEPOSIT: 55 gallon drum � 15.00 20.00 55 gallon drum return charge N/c 20.00 • tiDoes not meet specs. Not Texa o Ursa 3 t CROSS ro-ra� [.ESS ors NEI' TOTAL 18,966.09 5 DAYS ARO 19,765.78 2 DAYS ARO ASAP 24,211.98 . I M (6o n cn ;ode' •Atno r' D r IN1 rte co W- 70 N f1 C i m > -t �o N c N 0 0 3 c� a b.; d D� vJ � . °C r� -o o� zz c+ r+ C+ m rrl Q v� n m O V7 N C • G7 ` J • a r ' 3 O ,r n , a a m z q � ° c") v -n O rn O z Z o z o O r c � m ° o ~Z Z O • r m • N C m w z � o r r { %D co ; . 00 �• u vc ti •t i ,� IN1 rte co W- 70 N f1 C i m > -t �o N c N 0 0 3 c� a b.; d D� vJ � . °C r� -o o� zz c+ r+ C+ m m:u 1';�� od,,,; •�WQ r.0 r - i rrl Q o� n m rt z o :0 �- � m c c� a C 3 O Z z IA in v w roc -i w_ rA IOU ..Q •..._. _ .r 0 m a m 13 IA N a to "{ b 0. O O Rl rt c� N p 0. * 4- ;' C • m0 0 �cm r'� • 0 lb a z 3 a — V ' ° Ica a � J_ � � � � � h1 • � rt O .� O to .c co c O - O r. to 0 3 c a rp n m3 N „� N .� N G co N V x a a` o v M • � C 2 ti rn 1� u ~ h }sJ 1 Rl a o °� cr N n c t m cm N C .. c) a r w c N O O -01 m • � Gv i 4� • GI � � Q � y� a Y .r.O � N Attachment "C" j' j 7'L `: ANNUAL READY M 1 X CONCRETE CONTRACT 1p r n TQ pij l� J ^ �1 O� f�; X832 -40 [alu r.�V� r_s• -� '� /�'�"E'. Feb rua ry 21 , 1983 2:00 P. M. i'E11�f Q�'Y DESCRIPTION ARROW REDI -MIX HOUSTON SHELLS CON. TEXAS G � B CON. L S L CONC � CO .unrlr Fx7EN0£0 unr,r DcTFHoFO un+�r x No o uNir E�E:��J u:�:r �:� =�;�;, • R �'� r D �' � �' t c r r r; ^a�r•c a; ; • � _ ANNUAL READY MIX CONCRETE CONTRACT ; 1 per specifications I 1. ; 300 yards= Ready Mix Concrete 52.00 j 15,600.00 �NO BID 51.95 j 15,585.00 NO BID I i DELIVERY I AS N EDED '. t ' i __ � � � � � . i . ` 1 i . ' .{ GROSS TOTAL LEA" DISC. NE7"TO ,4L II L,`: ANNUAL ASBESTOS- CEMENT PIPE CONTRACT 3 � Q: N832 -38 �/,,�7"E_ February 16, 1983 2:00 P.M. T'�1�; QTY DESCRIPTIQIV L. ANNUAL ASBESTOS -- CEMENT PIPE, per specifications. I i DELIVERY: I ., G�7"Y �� AYTO� � � Attachment "D" ego rasULATio�v UTILITY SUPPLY CO. MAINTENANCE ENGR. •UN1T� . XTFNO � UNlTc I EaCTEN0E0 UN17 k0_D UNlTr Fx'ip %�' cJ ^�:�rc' � Esc �;' ^� R y r v 1 11,829.07 NO BID = i j I ` � I �3 DAYS ARO ! f� i 4 i � u i . � � . , 1 t- ,. �� - �_ CROSS ToTa L - LESS DISC. NET IOTA L in � ��! F � `� �°�'T'L �: ANNUAL HOT M 1 X COLD LAY ASPHALT '3l0� a 2- r�r�l.1^E� February 17, 19 3 2:00 P.M. �rrY o�. r�Ar�-o�N 81D TABULATION Attachment "E" TE1�t QTY �ESCRlPT1DN Runrrl t ff xrErvot:0 ur�rlr Dt FNoEO urvr x N o unr� R +�' ' � P c �' . e � r' r ANNUAL HOT MIX COLD LAY ASPHALT, per specifications. 2$.95 14,475.00 j i 1 j � { � � i C�h(U5� ! V 1/-�L LESS DISC. NET TOT�I L n r. s �,�tr_v �♦