1983 01 13 CC Minutes30113 -1
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN
January 13, 1983
The City Council of the City of Baytown, Texas, met
in regular session on Thursday, January 13, 1983, at 6:30
p.m. in the Council Chamber of the Baytown City Hall with
the following attendance:
Fred T. Philips Councilman
Jimmy Johnson Councilman
Perry M. Simmons Councilman
Mary E. Wilbanks Councilwoman
Roy L. Fuller Councilman
Allen Cannon Councilman
Emmett 0. Hutto Mayor
Fritz Lanham City Manager
Larry Patterson Assistant City Manager
Randy Strong City Attorney
Eileen P. Hall City Clerk
The meeting was called to order with a quorum present,
and the following business was transacted:
Consider Minutes for Regular Meeting Held December 9, 1982
and Special Meeting Held December 14, 1982
Councilman Philips suggested that the wording "Council
took no formal action" be added as the last sentence on
Page 21209 -11 and moved approval of the minutes with that
addition; Councilman Simmons seconded the motion. The
vote follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons,
Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon
Mayor Hutto
Nays: None
Receive Petitions
No petitions were presented at this time.
City Manager's Report
Safety Bulletin - Council was provided with a copy of
a safety bulletin which indicated for the fiscal year
ending September 30, 1982, there was a twenty (20 %) percent
reduction in employees' on- the -job injury and a twenty -nine
(29 %) percent reduction in incident rate. Mr. Lanham
commented that the safety program is effective and does
receive support of the employees.
cpl
30113 -2
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983
Houston Lighting and Power Company - The cost comparisons
provided by the company for January compared to November and
December reflected cost of $66.64 for a user of 1,000 KWH
compared to $78.01 for November and $76.54 for December.
Councilman Cannon pointed out that in the month of
October, there was an over recovery of $25,000,000 of which
Houston Lighting and Power Company's customers received no
rebate.
Councilman Philips stated that he would hope that the
PUC under Governor White's direction would move toward
making the company more accountable for the efficient use
of fuel, as well as purchase at the best price.
West District Wastewater Treatment Plant - Final inspection
of this facility was accomplished on January 12 by the
consulting engineer and representatives of the City of Baytown.
All was determined to be in order.
A change order was approved on the project in the West
District which Naylor is performing and a new completion
schedule has been submitted with a completion date of
April 7, 1983. Other rehabilitation work that is underway
in the West District is about seventy -eight (78 %) percent
complete.
Sliplining - Sliplining in the area of East James, East
Texas and Roseland Oaks is about seventy -two (72 %) percent
complete. The other sliplining contract which involves the
sliplining of lines in Eva Maud, Whispering Pines and along
Alexander Drive has been completed.
Caldwell Street - This contract has been completed with
exception of cleanup.
1982 Street Improvement Program - For the most part this
project is complete with the exception of Aron Street. All
other streets have been surfaced. Cleanup does remain on
the project.
Glen Meadow Drainage Project - This project is about
thirty (30 %) percent complete.
Drainage Work by City Crews - City crews have been
working in the Pringle -Rotan Subdivision performing extensive
drainage work. That work is about fifty (50 %) percent complete.
The drainage work along Milner, Oakwood and Hardin Road is
about twenty -five (25 %) percent complete. The work along
Hunt, South Road, Ferry Road and Market Street is completed.
Ponderosa /Craigmont Water Line Replacement - All the
line has been laid and the contractor is in the process of
pressure testing the system. After the pipe passes the
pressure testing, service connections will be made.
Questions and Comments from Council
In response to an inquiry from Council regarding the
status of the sign ordinance, Mr. Lanham stated that it
would be necessary to have another work session and that he
would hope to be ready for that in another two weeks. �"�
30113 -3
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983
Mr. Lanham, in response to Council inquiry, explained
that the work on East James Street is being performed by
city crews and a contractor. The contractor has installed
about 490 feet of pipe on East James and has about 300 feet
remaining. There were major obstructions in the line which
had to be eliminated prior to performing sliplining. City
crews are open cutting and installing intermediate portions
of sewer pipe (about 300 feet) that could not be sliplined.
Twenty -five (250) percent of the work has been completed.
Councilman Cannon brought up the fact that the Lemley
baby had been rejected for treatment in Houston and suggested
some thought by Council as to what could be done to cure
that situation. Council determined that the Administration
should be in contact with the local medical association in
this regard and that the county should be encouraged to take
a hard look at the capacity for care of premature infants.
Consider Authorization to Advertise for Bids for City of
Baytown's Insurance Needs
Council had previously been furnished with a copy of
the report prepared by The Wyatt Company on risk management
and insurance program for the City of Baytown. Council had
discussed that report during a work session prior to the
Council meeting and had reviewed specifications. The Admin-
istration recommended that Council authorize the advertisement
for bids for City of Baytown's insurance coverage.
Councilman Fuller moved that the Administration be
authorized to advertise for bids for City of Baytown
insurance coverage in line with the study performed by The
Wyatt Company; Councilman Cannon seconded the motion. The
vote follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons,
Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon
Mayor Hutto
Nays: None
Consider Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -1, Abandoning a Portion
of North Sixth Street
The Administration was contacted by a person representing
the property owner regarding a two -foot encroachment into
the City of Baytown's street right of way on Sixth Street.
All utility companies have been contacted and report that it
would be no problem for the encroachment to be abandoned.
An appraisal was performed. The Administration recommended
Council approval and payment by the property owner of $100,
which is the minimum payment allowable by ordinance for
abandonment of city -owned property. The tract of land being
considered for abandonment is 21.4 feet in length and 2.1
feet in width. The building encroaching on the property is
a garage. The property is in process of being sold and the
title company is insisting the matter be resolved.
Councilman Johnson moved for adoption of the ordinance;
® , Councilman Philips seconded the motion. The vote follows:
30113 -4
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons,
Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon
Mayor Hutto
Nays: None
ORDINANCE NO. 3533 -A
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN,
PROVIDING THAT A PORTION OF NORTH SIXTH STREET BE VACATED,
ABANDONED AND CLOSED: PROVIDING FOR THE QUITCLAIMING OF THE
CITY'S INTEREST IN SAID LAND: AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE
DATE HEREOF.
Consider Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -2, Authorizing a
Contract with First Presbyterian Church of Goose Creek
for Operation and Maintenance of Transporation Program
Council had authorized the support of the operation and
maintenance of transportation program for senior citizens to
the extent of $15,000 from revenue sharing funds and $11,000
toward the senior citizens nutrition center for hot meals.
These two contracts are annual contracts.
Randy Strong, City Attorney, explained that on prior
contracts, the City had required the contractor to carry
Public Liability and Property Damage insurance with limits
of $100,000; $300,000 and $100,000. That has been changed
in compliance with the recommendation of the insurance
consultant to a $500,000 combined single limit. This is the
only change in the contract.
Councilman Simmons moved for adoption of the ordinance;
Councilman Cannon seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons,
Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon
Mayor Hutto
Nays: None
ORDINANCE NO. 3534
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO
EXECUTE AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST TO A CONTRACT WITH FIRST
PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF GOOSE CREEK FOR THE OPERATION AND
MAINTENANCE OF TRANSPORATION PROGRAM AND PROVIDING FOR THE
EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF.
Consider Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -3, Authorizing a
Contract with First Presbyterian Church of Goose Creek
to support Baytown Senior Citizens' Nutrition Center
Councilwoman Wilbanks moved for adoption of the ordinance;
Councilman Fuller seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons,
Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon
Mayor Hutto
_m
Nays: None
30113 -5
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983
ORDINANCE NO. 3535
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO
EXECUTE AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST TO A CONTRACT WITH
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF GOOSE CREEK FOR HOT NOON MEALS
TO THE ELDERLY AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF.
Hold Public Hearing on Protest of Application for Wine and
Beer Retailer's Permit at 100 West Baker Road
Mayor Hutto called the public hearing to order concerning
the application for Wine and Beer Retailer's Permit at
100 West Baker Road. All those persons interested in testi-
fying during the hearing were given ample opportunity to
sign the register in the lobby. Afterwhich, Mayor Hutto
administered the oath to those desiring to testify. He
explained that the hearing was being conducted in compliance
with Section 4.14 of the Code of Ordinance and Section 1141
of the Alcoholic Beverage Code for the purpose of receiving
evidence and public input prior to making a recommendation,
if any, to the Alcoholic Beverage Commission. Mayor Hutto
encouraged each speaker to be brief and to the point and
informed those present that a recording was being made of
the proceeding.
Knox Askins, Attorney for Angel Brothers, Inc., applicant
for Wine and Beer Retailer's Permit at 100 West Baker Road,
spoke in favor of the application on behalf of Angel Brothers.
First, he stated that the application is framed as an on- premise
beer license for a facility which will be a combination
convenience grocery store, self- service gasoline station.
The applicants presently have three establishments of this
type in Baytown and have been in this type business in
Baytown for about 15 years. The reason for the application
for an on- premises license, even though this will not be a
club or lounge is that it is quite common for those in this
type business to secure on- premise rather than off - premise
beer license for the reason that if a customer purchases
a beer in one of the stores and opens the beer before
leaving the property lines of the establishment, this is
considered to be consumption on premises. Although the
applicant has no intention to have a sit -down facility,
in keeping with almost every convenience store owner /operator,
application is being made for on- premise permit as a matter
of protection.
Mr. Askins emphasized that this application was in no
manner an application to operate a lounge and the applicant
would have no objection if Council were to approve the
application contingent that no lounge -type operation would
exist at that location.
The location of the establishment is 100 West Baker
Road which is near the intersection of North Main Street
in a heavily developed commercial area. Mr. Askins pointed
out that the petition contained only five signatures of
persons residing within 300 feet of the proposed location
and that there are no churches or schools within that distance.
30113 -6
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983
He stated that from reading the petition, it appeared that the
signers were objecting to the sale of alcoholic beverages at
this location whether on or off - premise. He reminded Council
that the issue is not wet /dry since the voters of Baytown had
decided that Baytown would be a "wet area."
The petition cites a number of violations all but two
belong to Mr. Angel's brother. This record is extremely
good since the chances are that someone with false identifi-
cation could purchase beer illegally at anytime. Since, in
Mr. Askin's opinion, there was no evidence presented within
the petition that would be relevant reason to deny the
applicant, and since the applicants have an excellent record
as citizens of Baytown and businessmen, he urged that Council
vote favorably on the application.
In response to an inquiry from Council, Mr. Askins stated
that to his knowledge, the applicant had complied with all
requirements of the City.
Councilman Johnson pointed out that Mr. Angel would
probably construct the facility at that location whether Council
voted favorably on this application or not. Mr. Askins
responded that the applicant would need Council approval
since he did intend to sell beer.
W. M. Green, 11 Dent, Baytown, Texas, referred to the
petition and the six (6) items specified in the petition as
examples of what could happen with an on- premise license at
that location. He pointed out that once the application
would be approved, the applicant could elect to set up tables
and allow people to congregate and drink on the parking area.
If this were to happen, there would be cases of intoxication
which would be a hindrance to others. He also pointed out
that this location is adjacent to a residential area and
very near Sterling High School. There are small children
that wait adjacent to this business for school buses.
Theresa Moore, 2 Dent, explained that her residence is
across from the proposed location and her property is bounded
by the business on one side. Mrs. Moore stated that the
manner in which the driveway into the business has been
poured would cause the residents some concern with an
on- premise license, along with the fact that there are
children who will be riding bikes in that area and who will
be waiting for school buses at that location. Mrs. Moore
feared that the children would be endangered.
In response to inquiry from Council, the City Attorney
explained that Council does have the authority by State law
to approve applications for the sale of beer. Therefore,
in this case, rather than simply making a recommendation to
the County Judge and Alcoholic Beverage Commission, Council
would be making a determination as to the sale of beer at
that location.
Councilman Philips stated that in most cases in the
past when Council has reviewed applications for alcoholic
beverage permits, the situations involved protecting the
peace where a tavern has caused problems in the neighborhood
due to noise, parking and other problems related to a tavern -type
operation. In hearing both sides, Councilman Philips stated
30113 -7
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983
that he was not convinced that denying the application would
change the circumstances in the neighborhood. There are
already alcoholic beverages available for sale at nearby
outlets. The fact that the applicant is saying that no
lounge atmosphere or music will be provided to encourage
people to stay at that location and consume alcoholic beverages
persuaded him to say that the applicant would be doing a
minimum thing with sale of alcoholic beverages, would be
keeping the peace and would not create a tavern -type atmosphere
there. For those reasons, Councilman Philips moved to
approve the application for on- premise license.
Councilman Fuller stated that legally he could see no
(0"®* way that the application could be denied.
Councilman Philips reiterated that approving or denying
the application will not change the circumstances that there
are outlets existing in the area for sale of alcoholic
beverages.
Councilman Simmons stated that there is legislation
being proposed that would preclude any convenience -type
store unless there are provisions made for seats and tables
being granted an on- premise permit.
Councilman Fuller seconded the motion.
Councilman Cannon stated that he could support application
for an off- premise license, but because of the nearness of
the high school, he could not support an on- premise license.
The vote follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons,
Wilbanks, and Fuller
Mayor Hutto
Nays: Councilman Cannon
Mayor Hutto closed the public hearing and recessed for
five minutes. When the meeting reconvened, the following
business was transacted:
Consider Proposed Resolution Nos. 824, 825, 826 and 827,
Approving Creation of San Jacinto Place Utility District
Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 Respectively
Council held a work session previously with representa-
tives of Pacer Development Company regarding the possible
formation of four municipal utility districts in the vicinity
of San Jacinto Mall. During that work session, discussion
centered around the fact that the owners would like to form
municipal utility districts in order to provide funds for a
portion of development costs. The owners have indicated a
willingness, if the City of Baytown would permit the formation
of these districts, to permit Baytown to annex the areas.
At the time of annexation by the city, the districts would
discontinue taxation. The Administration did meet with
representatives of Pacer Development on several occasions.
The documents presented to Council prior to the meeting are
based on those meetings and the staff feels that Baytown's
interests are protected, along with those of the developer.
30113 -8
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983
Randy Strong, City Attorney, reviewed the documents for
Council. He mentioned that the initial document as to each
district is the petition to the city that a municipal utility
district be created which documents describe the general
nature of the work to be performed in each district - -
construction of waterworks, sanitary sewer systems and
drainage systems, along with estimated costs for development.
Attached to the petition is a description of the area being
proposed for inclusion in the municipal utility district,
along with a resolution for Council consideration to create
each of the four districts. This resolution is very similar
to past resolutions presented for creation of municipal
utility districts. The resolution contains the City's
requirements and conditions under which the district may
issue bonds and what interest rate at which those bonds may
be issued. The resolution specifies that the Director of
Public Works must approve plans and specifications for
construction of water, sanitary sewer and drainage facilities
within the district. Those facilities are required to be
constructed in accordance with City of Baytown specifications,
and the resolution allows the city to inspect during construction.
Prior to the sale of any lot or parcel within the district,
approval of the Planning Commission must be obtained, a plat
must be recorded in the Deed Records of Harris County and
the district must otherwise comply with all rules and regulations
of the Planning Department. Added to these particular
resolutions, is the provision that prior to any of the
districts issuing bonds or other obligations that are to be
paid out of revenues, the districts must submit for City
Council review and approval a water and sewer rate feasibility
study.
Another condition of the resolutions is following
creation of the district and prior to the sale of bonds, the
districts will sign the allocation agreements attached to
the resolutions. The allocation agreement is very similar
for all four of the districts. What this does is allow the
city at some point in the future to annex the district,
bring it within the city limits of the City of Baytown and
tax the property. The district would continue to exist as a
separate district, providing water and sewer service to its
customers to allow the district time to pay off its bonded
indebtedness. In effect, the city would be annexing the
district but would not be assuming its bonded indebtedness.
The city will contract with the districts to provide sewer
service. The districts will obtain water from Baytown Area
Water Authority. Under the allocation agreements, initially
the districts would not be annexed. There would be some
time period before the city would annex the district.
During that period the district would collect ad valorem
taxes. Upon annexation, the district would cease the collection
of ad valorem taxes. However, the district would continue
to collect revenues for water and sewer service to pay for
bonded indebtedness.
Article I of the allocation agreement provides that
upon repayment of all the district's obligation, the district
and the city will take steps necessary to dissolve the
district. Earlier in that article, requirements are discussed.
One requirement is that the city may not annex the district
at all until at least ninety (900) percent of the facilities
30113 -9
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983
for which bonds have been issued have been installed or
annexation may take place after some specified time period.
Article 1182 -c.1 of State law specifies that the only step
necessary to dissolve a district is for City Council by two -
thirds majority vote to pass an ordinance dissolving the
district. Upon this dissolution, the city would take over
the assets of the district.
The Administration recommended approval of the proposed
resolutions. Mr. Lanham called Council's attention to the
fact that the allocation agreement provided that the city
and district agreed that the city may annex all of the
territory within the district at the earlier of such time as
at least ninety (90%) percent of the facilities for which
district bonds had been authorized are installed, or five
years after the date of issuance of any obligations to
finance the facilities. The Administration requested Council
guidance in that regard. Mr. Lanham mentioned that the only
existing similar situation is the Industrial Districts where
the policy is that in the case of new industries, no taxes
are paid the first year and 1/3 of the anticipated value is
paid the second, third and fourth years, which provides a
four -year moratorium.
Councilman Fuller moved to adopt the proposed resolutions
with the modification in the allocation agreements that the
time at which the City may annex be four years rather than
five. Councilman Philips seconded the motion.
Dan Sharp, representative of Pacer Development, was
present and indicated the company would be agreeable with
this modification. The vote follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons,
Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon
Mayor Hutto
Nays: None
RESOLUTION NO. 824
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN,
TEXAS GRANTING CONSENT AS PROVIDED BY TEXAS REVISED CIVIL
STATUTES ARTICLE 97a, TO THE FORMATION OF A MUNICIPAL UTILITY
DISTRICT UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF SECTION 54.016, TEXAS WATER
CODE, TO BE KNOWN AS SAN JACINTO PLACE MUNICIPAL UTILITY
DISTRICT NO. 1, AND EMBRACING WITHIN ITS BOUNDARIES 81
ACRES, MORE OR LESS, IN HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID AREA
BEING HEREIN MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS
IN EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO, UPON THE CONDITIONS AND
PROVISIONS HEREIN STATED.
RESOLUTION NO. 825
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN,
TEXAS GRANTING CONSENT AS PROVIDED BY TEXAS REVISED CIVIL
STATUTES ARTICLE 970a, TO THE FORMATION OF A MUNICIPAL
UTILITY DISTRICT UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF SECTION 54.016,
TEXAS WATER CODE, TO BE KNOWN AS SAN JACINTO PLACE MUNICIPAL
UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 2, AND EMBRACING WITHIN ITS BOUNDARIES
78 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, IN HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID AREA
BEING HEREIN MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS
IN EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO, UPON THE CONDITIONS AND
PROVISIONS HEREIN STATED.
30113 -10
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983
RESOLUTION NO. 826
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN,
TEXAS GRANTING CONSENT AS PROVIDED BY TEXAS REVISED CIVIL
STATUTES ARTICLE 970a, TO THE FORMATION OF A MUNICIPAL
UTILITY DISTRICT UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF SECTION 54.016,
TEXAS WATER CODE, TO BE KNOWN AS SAN JACINTO PLACE MUNICIPAL
UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 3, AND EMBRACING WITHIN ITS BOUNDARIES
122 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, IN HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID AREA
BEING HEREIN MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS
IN EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO, UPON THE CONDITIONS AND
PROVISIONS HEREIN STATED.
RESOLUTION NO. 827
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN,
TEXAS GRANTING CONSENT AS PROVIDED BY TEXAS REVISED CIVIL
STATUES ARTICLE 970a, TO THE FORMATION OF A MUNICIPAL UTILITY
DISTRICT UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF SECTION 54.016, TEXAS WATER
CODE, TO BE KNOWN AS SAN JACINTO PLACE MUNICIPAL UTILITY
DISTRICT NO. 4, AND EMBRACING WITHIN ITS BOUNDARIES 108
ACRES, MORE OR LESS, IN HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID AREA
BEING HEREIN MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS
IN EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO, UPON THE CONDITIONS AND
PROVISIONS HEREIN STATED.
Consider Approval of Grant Amendment for Central Sewer
District Systematic Sewer System Evaluation Survey
Council took action previously to apply for a grant to
continue the Central District work. Ivan Langford, Consulting
Engineer, explained that approval was being sought for grant
amendment in order that the city may proceed with participation
in the EPA Construction Grant Program for performing the
Central Sewer District Systematic Sewer System Evaluation
Survey. This was done in the West District and as a result
of that, the city obtained grant funds for sewer system
rehabilitation. This was not done in the East District
because it would not have been cost effective under EPA
formula. However, the city is still attempting to
rehabilitate sewer lines on basis of deterioration in the
East District. The estimated costs for the Systematic Sewer
System Evaluation Survey would be $496,269.24, which includes
fixed fee contract of $32,000 for engineering services. If
the grant amendment is acceptable, EPA will pay seventy -five
(750) percent of the $496,269.24, leaving $124,067.31 as the
city's share. The city's portion will be funded from the
Sanitary Sewer Grant Fund. The survey will consist basically
of smoke testing the Central Sewer District, limited televising
(between 5% to 10 %), cleaning of lines, quantification
testing, field evaluations, a physical inspection of all
manholes that can be located, noting the condition of the
manhole and the materials that the manhole is composed of.
Some of the manholes will not be located, but where sewers
come together, there should be a manhole. Some manholes will
not be entered because of structurally bad conditions.
30113 -11
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983
Council had previously dropped the Central District from the
EPA Grant Program but it was determined that seventy -five
(75 %) percent funding could be available. Once the study
is made, the city can go forward to complete the facility
plan and the Environmental Assessment to complete the
Step 1 services for the Central Sewer District.
In response to an inquiry from Council, Mr. Langford
stated that the engineers must furnish documentation as to
all costs. Mr. Lanham mentioned that the City of Baytown
would have an individual to monitor the contract. The
Administration recommended approval of grant amendment for
Central Sewer District Systematic Sewer Evaluation Survey.
Councilwoman Wilbanks moved for approval of grant
amendment for Central Sewer District Systematic Sewer
Evaluation Survey. Councilman Simmons seconded the motion.
The vote follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons,
Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon
Mayor Hutto
Nays: None
Consider Authorization to Advertise for Bids for 1982 -83
Sanitary Sewer Sliplining - Phase II
Several areas of the city have been experiencing collapsed
sewer line problems. Those have been put together into one
program, totaling an estimated $90,000. Areas involved are
1400 linear feet of 12 inch line on West Sterling from South
Jones to Felton; 358 feet of 12 inch line on Defee from
Felton to Hemphill; 245 feet of 12 inch line on Hemphill from
Defee to West Texas; 1440 of 6 inch line between West Main
and Bolster from Thibodaux to Lee Drive; 460 feet of 6 inch
pipe on Linwood, 460 feet of 8 inch pipe on Linwood. The
Administration requested authorization to advertise for bids.
Councilman Simmons moved to authorize the Administration
to advertise for bids for 1982 -83 Sanitary Sewer Sliplining -
Phase II; Councilman Philips seconded the motion. The vote
follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons,
Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon
Mayor Hutto
Nays: None
Consider Proposed Ordinance, Awarding Annual Gasoline and
Diesel Fuel Contract
The ordinance was written to provide Council with the
option of awarding the contract; however, the Administration
recommended that bids be rejected and that the Administration
be authorized to advertise for bids on another basis.
30113 -12
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983
The City of Baytown requests bids on gasoline and diesel
fuel every year. Due to market conditions, the successful
bidders have not been able to give the city a price that
would be in effect for a whole year. Bids have been awarded
in the past on the basis of low bidder who gave a bid that
was good for thirty (30) days. After that time, the bidder
could change the billing to the city as the market changed.
The Purchasing Department has worked very diligently to
derive a method by which the city could obtain competitive
bids and at the same time have those bids tied to something.
For instance, the city's depository contract bids are tied
to treasury bill rates. Purchasing came up with platts
oilgram pricing which the Administration felt all potential
bidders were familiar with. There is a publication which
comes out on a regular basis that provides this information.
A pre -bid conference was held with prospective bidders
and there were no objections expressed. The Administration
felt the companies would be able to bid on that basis. Prior
to receipt of bids, the Administration was contacted by one
of the vendors indicating that that company would not be
able to bid. When the bids were received, only one bid was
actually received that was based on the city's specifications.
A no bid was received and another company bid, but took
exception to the city's specifications. Two other potential
bidders indicated that they were unable to bid. Exxon felt
that the bid should be tied to terminal or rack price.
Dennis Trigg, owner of HTB Petroleum Products, the only
company that had bid to City of Baytown specifications
addressed Council. Mr. Trigg stated that standard rack
pricing is what the major oil companies will sell to a given
consumer at a time and place of delivery for their product.
Platts oilgram is a publication which takes the average prices
of products that have been traded in the previous 24- hours.
When the city went out for bids, a pre -bid conference was
held at City Hall. O'Roark, Exxon, Gulf and HTB all had
representatives present. No one indicated that their company
could not bid on that basis. HTB did bid and bid exactly
to specifications. Using the base period of November 30,
platts low for regular grade gasoline was $ .90 a gallon,
exclusive of taxes. HTB bid this to the city at 3.7 over
low water platts. Exxon stated that they could not bid
on low water platt basis, but would bid the product at
$ .913 per gallon as of December 30, 1982 which is 30 days
after platts were issued. Gasoline in that 30 -day period
dropped $ .575; therefore, HTB could have lowered their bid
by $ .575 and still have come in under the Exxon bid.
In response to an inquiry from Council, Mr. Trigg stated
that rack price to a distributor means that the distributor
can go to the refiner and purchase the product at that rack
and sell to whomever. Exxon would have a rack price for a
wholesale distributor, rack price for a consumer which would
be the City of Baytown, and a rack price for retail service
stations. That rack price is similar to platts and changes
from day to day.
30113 -13
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983
In the discussion that followed, Council discussed the
possibility of the City purchasing gasoline and diesel fuel
as needed by calling to obtain the best-price. However, the
Charter of the City of Baytown would prohibit this type
purchase. Purchases of this type must be made on a formal
bid basis. The possibility of bidding based on rack prices
was also discussed, but it was noted that there is no
publication indicating what that price would be and that
price would vary from manufacturer to manufacturer.
Mr. Lanham stated that he felt the plan that the
Administration had developed was a good plan, but perhaps
a bit premature. Mr. Trigg responded that this was not
the first circumstance of a governmental body using oil
platts to obtain bids because Harris County receives bids
on that basis.
Councilman Philips moved to rebid the contract;
Councilman Simmons seconded the motion.
In response to an inquiry from Council, Mr. Lanham
stated that the Administration would rebid the item on
rack price basis.
Councilman Fuller stated that he could not support that
because platts oilgram is a nationally recognized figure
published daily, whereas rack prices vary from manufacturer
to manufacturer on a daily basis.
Mayor Hutto stated that he could support the motion if
the item would be rebid on a platts oilgram basis. Councilman
Philips had no problem with this.
Councilman Cannon stated that he could not support
that because that is the basis on which the bid was taken;
Councilman Johnson concurred.
Councilman Philips stated that it appeared that perhaps
not all parties involved were really certain of how to bid
on the basis requested. The vote follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips and Simmons
Mayor Hutto
Nays: Council members Johnson, Wilbanks, Fuller
and Cannon
Councilman Fuller made the point that all prospective
bidders were invited to a pre -bid conference where each
was informed how to bid the item and there were no objections.
HTB Petroleum bid the item as specified by the City of
Baytown.
Councilman Johnson moved to adopt the ordinance,
awarding the contract to HTB Petroleum; Councilman Fuller
seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons,
Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon
Mayor Hutto
Nays: None
30113 -14
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983
ORDINANCE NO. 3536
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF HTB PETROLEUM PRODUCTS
FOR THE ANNUAL GASOLINE AND DIESEL FUEL CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZING
THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF THREE HUNDRED
THIRTEEN THOUSAND FORTY FIVE & N01100 ($313,045.00) DOLLARS.
For tabulation, see Attachment "A."
Consider Proposed Ordinance, Establishing School Speed Zone
on Bayway Drive for Baytown Junior School
The school district was contacted regarding participation
in the cost of flashing signals at this location, but favored
establishing a regular school speed zone. The temporary
signs are in effect from 7:15 p.m. to 9:00 a.m. and from
2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. The Administration, after checking
with the school superintendent, recommended that the school
speed zone be established for 7:30 a.m. to 8:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. The school district has requested that
the crossing be painted and that for the first few days the
police department pay special attention to that area. The
Administration recommended approval of the ordinance.
Councilman Johnson moved for adoption of the ordinance;
Councilwoman Wilbanks seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons,
Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon
Mayor Hutto
Nays: None
Mr. Lanham stated that the crossing would be painted and
that the police department would work the crossing the first
few days to call attention to the school speed zone.
ORDINANCE NO. 3537
AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING A PORTION OF BAYWAY DRIVE BETWEEN
HONEYSUCKLE DRIVE AND 600 FEET SOUTH OF POST OAK DRIVE
A SCHOOL ZONE; CONTAINING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A
REPEALING CLAUSE; PRESCRIBING A MAXIMUM PENALTY OF TWO
HUNDRED AND N01100 ($200.00) DOLLARS; AND PROVIDING FOR
THE PUBLICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF.
Consent Agenda
Jerry Fletcher, Community Development Planner, in
response to a question from Council, explained that the
problems that Mr. Plummer had been experiencing with his
workers was simply a misunderstanding between he and the
workers concerning on what basis the workers were to be
paid. Since that time, Mr. Plummer had not used the same
crew and is no longer experiencing problems.
30113 -15
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983
Councilman Simmons expressed reservations with regard
to awarding the contract for Annual Concrete Pipe to General
Concrete because he was not sure that that company could
provide the 24 ", 30" and 36" pipe requested. He pointed out
that the difference between the low bidder with 1/2 day
delivery and the next low bidder with 1/2 day delivery was
only $242. In an emergency situation, if the pipe is not
available, this could cost the city much more than the
difference in the two bids.
A representative of the company was present to state
that the company does stock those sizes of pipe and the
company has several different places to obtain pipe. He
stated that the company would honor the bid.
Mr. Lanham stated that if an order is placed by the
city which the company could not honor, the Administration
would report to Council for further action.
Councilman Simmons stated that he was of the opinion
that the bid of General Concrete was the lowest, but perhaps
not the best bid. Therefore, he moved to reject the low bid
and that the contract be awarded to the next low bidder,
Whites Supply, since Gifford Hill was disqualified due to
five (5) days delivery. The motion died for lack of second.
Councilman Fuller moved to adopt the ordinance awarding
the annual concrete pipe contract to General Concrete Products
Company; Councilman Philips seconded the motion.
With regard to the question concerning the bid for
purchase of a 1/2 ton pickup for the utility department, no
alternate bid had been requested. The company had elected
to bid an alternate for a bed which was one foot longer than
specified. Since Council had determined to remove Item f
from the Consent Agenda, the motion on that item was voted
on after consideration of the Consent Agenda. Council
considered the Consent Agenda Items a through a and g through
m as follows:
a. Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -6, will award the
contract for the rehabilitation at 109 Graham
Street. Four bids were received. Prosper Brothers
submitted the low bid of $7,608.80.
We recommend the low bidder, Prosper Brothers, be
awarded this contract.
b. Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -7, will award the
contract for rehabilitation at 323 East Gulf
Street. Four bids were received. Prosper Brothers
submitted the low bid in the amount of $6,967.22.
We recommend the low bidder, Prosper Brothers, be
awarded this contract.
C. Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -8, will award the
contract for the rehabilitation at 210 W. Francis.
Four bids were received. Mark Plummer submitted
the low bid of $6,095.00
30113 -16
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983
We recommend the low bidder, Mark Plummer, be
awarded this contract.
d. Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -9, will award the
contract for the rehabilitation at 1004 Johnston.
Four bids were received. Mark Plummer submitted
the low bid of $6,900.00.
We recommend the low bidder, Mark Plummer be
awarded this contract.
e. Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -10, will award the
bid for the purchase of flexible base material.
Three bids were received. Parker Brothers &
Company, Inc. submitted the low bid of $63,000 for
7,000 tons of flexible base material at F.O.B.
plantsite ($9.00 /ton) and alternative one of
$83,510 for 7,000 tons of flexible base material
at F.O.B., 1601 West Main Street in Baytown
($11.93 /ton).
We recommend the low bidder, Parker Brothers &
Co., Inc., be awarded this contract.
g. Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -12, will award the
bid for annual brass fittings contract. We received
six (6) bids. Jones Supply submitted the low bid
of $23,209.18. However Jones Supply does indicate
a delivery time of stock to eight weeks with a
factory shipment. It also requires a minimum
order of 500 pounds. Golden Triangle, who is the
next low bid with a bid of $24,577.80 does not
require a minimum order and has a delivery time
which meets specifications.
We recommend Golden Triangle be awarded this
contract.
h. Proposed Ordinance No. 3011 -13, will award the bid
for the annual photographic supplies contract. We
received one bid. That was the bid of Southside
Camera Center in the amount of $12,719.
We recommend Southside Camera Center be awarded
this contract.
i. Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -14, will award the
bid for the purchase of rear leading solid waste
collection vehicles. We received three (3) bids.
Davis Trucks & Equipment submitted the low bid of
$92,970. The Council has budgeted $110,000 for
the purchase of these bids.
We recommend the low bidder, Davis Trucks &
Equipment, be awarded this contract.
la
30113 -17
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983
j. Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -15, will award the
bid for the annual water meter contract. We
received six (6) bids on fourteen items. Various
vendors were the low bidder on different items.
The City's recommendations are as follows:
Items 1, 8, 9, 11, 12, and 13, we recommend Neptune
Water Meter Company.
Items 2 and 6, we recommend Rockwell International.
On items 3 and 4, we recommend Ernie Bradley Sales
& Service.
In items 5, 7, and 14, we recommend Utility Supply.
On item 10 we recommend Hershey Products, Inc.
The total bid of all these items is $60,016.
k. Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -16, will award the
bid for the annual cement stabilized sand contract.
Two bids were received. Keown Supply submitted
the low bid of $71,125. Keown Supply is located
in Beaumont, Texas and is located 72 miles from
Lee Drive. The Public Works Dept. feels that this
distance is too far to travel with stabilized
sand. This is based on the fact that stabilized
sand will harden during the time involved. Therefore,
we feel it is not feasible because of the time and
money involved to award the bid to Keown Supply.
The second lowest bid was that of Anahuac Towing
and Shell in the amount of $76,375. They are
located 8 miles from Lee Drive.
We recommend Anahuac Towing and Shell be awarded
this contract.
1. Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -17, will award the
bid for a 1/2 ton pickup for the Utility Dept.
Six (6) bids were received. San Jacinto Ford
submitted the low bid of $8,103.37. Council has
budgeted $9,550 for this purchase.
We recommend the low bidder, San Jacinto Ford, be
awarded this contract.
M. Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -18, will award the
bid for the annual calcium hypochlorite contract.
We received four (4) bids. Van Waters & Rogers
submitted the low bid of $12,411.25.
We recommend the low bidder, Van Waters & Rogers,
be awarded this contract.
30113 -18
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983
Councilman Fuller moved to adopt the Consent Agenda
Items a through a and g through m; Councilman Philips seconded
the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons,
Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon
Mayor Hutto
Nays: None
ORDINANCE NO. 3538
AN ORDINANCE AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
REHABILITATION PROJECT #82 -04 -06 TO PROSPER BROTHERS FOR
THE SUM OF SEVEN THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED EIGHT & 80 /100 ($7,608.80)
DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -6)
ORDINANCE NO. 3539
AN ORDINANCE AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
REHABILITATION PROJECT #82 -04 -07 TO PROSPER BROTHERS FOR
THE SUM OF SIX THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED SIXTY SEVEN & 72/100
($6,967.72) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -7)
ORDINANCE NO. 3540
AN ORDINANCE AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
REHABILITATION PROJECT #82 -04 -08 TO MARK PLUMMER FOR THE
SUM OF SIX THOUSAND NINETY FIVE & N01100 ($6,095.00) DOLLARS.
(Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -8)
ORDINANCE NO. 3541
AN ORDINANCE AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
REHABILITATION PROJECT #82 -03 -09 TO MARK PLUMMER FOR THE
SUM OF SIX THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED & N01100 ($6,900.00) DOLLARS.
(Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -9)
ORDINANCE NO. 3542
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF PARKER BROTHERS & CO.,
INC., FOR FLEXIBLE BASE MATERIAL AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT
BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF EIGHTY THREE THOUSAND
FIVE HUNDRED TEN & N01100 ($83,510.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed
Ordinance No. 30113 -10)
ORDINANCE NO. 3543
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF GOLDEN TRIANGLE FOR THE
ANNUAL BRASS FITTINGS CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT
BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF TWENTY FOUR THOUSAND
FIVE HUNDRED SEVENTY SEVEN & 80/100 ($24,577.80) DOLLARS.
(Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -12)
ORDINANCE NO. 3544
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF SOUTHSIDE CAMERA CENTER
FOR THE ANNUAL PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZING
THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF TWELVE
THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED NINETEEN & N01100 ($12,719.00) DOLLARS.
(Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -13)
30113 -19
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983
ORDINANCE NO. 3545
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF DAVIS TRUCKS & EQUIPMENT
FOR REAR LOADING SOLID WASTE COLLECTION VEHICLES AND AUTHORIZING
THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF NINETY TWO
THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED SEVENTY & N01100 ($92,970.00) DOLLARS.
(Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -14)
ORDINANCE NO. 3546
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF NEPTUNE WATER METER COMPANY,
ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL, ERNIE BRADLEY SALES & SERVICE,
UTILITY SUPPLY, AND HERSHEY PRODUCTS, INC. FOR THE ANNUAL
WATER METER CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY
OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF FIFTY NINE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED
THIRTY SIX & N01100 ($59,836.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance
No. 30113 -15)
ORDINANCE NO. 3547
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF ANAHUAC TOWING & SHELL FOR
THE ANNUAL CEMENT STABILIZED SAND CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZING
THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF SEVENTY SIX
THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED SEVENTY FIVE & N01100 ($76,375.00)
DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -16)
ORDINANCE NO. 3548
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF SAN JACINTO FORD FOR 1/2
TON PICKUP TRUCK AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF
BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF EIGHT THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED THREE &
37/100 ($8,103.37) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -17)
ORDINANCE NO. 3549
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF VAN WATERS & ROGERS FOR
THE ANNUAL CALCIUM HYPOCHLORITE CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZING THE
PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF TWELVE THOUSAND
FOUR HUNDRED ELEVEN & 25/100 ($12,411.25) DOLLARS. (Proposed
Ordinance No. 30113 -18)
For tabulations, see Attachments "B" through "J."
Previously, Council had considered Consent Agenda Item
f as follows:
f. Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -11, will award the
bid for annual concrete pipe contract. We received
six (6) bids. General Concrete Products Company
submitted the lowest and best bid for the sum of
$54,581. Monroe Farrell did not bid all the items
and Gifford Hill has a 5 day delivery time which
for this type of supplies is unacceptable.
We recommend General Concrete Products Company be
awarded this contract.
30113 -20
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983
Councilman Fuller had moved to adopt the ordinance
awarding the annual concrete pipe contract to General Concrete
Products Company; Councilman Philips had seconded that
motion. The vote on that motion follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Wilbanks,
Fuller, and Cannon
Nays: Councilman Simmons
Mayor Hutto
ORDINANCE NO. 3550
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF GENERAL CONCRETE PRODUCTS
COMPANY FOR THE ANNUAL CONCRETE PIPE CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZING
THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF FIFTY FOUR
THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED EIGHTY ONE & N01100 ($54,581.00)
DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -11)
For tabulation, see Attachment "K•"
Consider Approving Baker Road Beautification Plan
To beautify Baker Road, the plan is to plant approximately
250 trees -- pines, red and white crepe myrtles in the medians.
No flower beds will be developed so maintenance will be
minimum. Estimated cost of the project is $5,000. Beautify
Baytown Association is committed to an $800 donation and the
Clean City Commission has agreed to begin a drive to acquire
donations from entities located along Baker Road. At the
present time the Administration is seeking approval of the
plan with a goal of receiving necessary funding from local
organizations to fund the project.
Councilman Simmons moved to approve the plan to beautify
Baker Road; Councilman Fuller seconded the motion. The vote
follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons,
Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon
Mayor Hutto
Nays: None
Consider Appointments of Sesquicentennial Committee
Councilman Philips moved that Mr. Sam Bramlett be
appointed to Chair the Sesquicentennial Committee; Councilman
Fuller seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Simmons, Fuller,
and Cannon
Mayor Hutto
Nays: None
Abstained: Council members Johnson and Wilbanks
30113 -21
Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983
Consider Appointments to Electrical Board
Council will make appointments to the Electrical
Board at a later meeting.
Consider Appointments to Community Development Advisory
Committee
Council will make appointments to the Community Development
Advisory Committee at a later meeting.
Recess Into Executive Session to Discuss Land Acquisition
Mayor Hutto recessed the open meeting into executive
session to discuss land acquisition. When the open meeting
resumed, the following business was transacted:
Consider Approval of Purchasing Property for Park Purposes
Councilman Philips moved to authorize the Administration
to proceed with the acquisition of the Reimer property, Parcel
No. 7 on the map attached to the minutes as Attachment "L,"
which was previously authorized by Council. Councilman
Simmons seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons,
Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon
Mayor Hutto
Nays: None
Adj ourn
There being no further business to be transacted, the
meeting was adjourned.
2Z:: � C, . , e -
Eileen P. Hall, City Clerk
T1 TL E :—Conunun i ty Der ve l opment
BID: #26
DATE: _ 12/21/82
yr I r yr v/" r r %-/ vvry
B1D TABULATION Attachment "B"
Fd shnnk JBA Const. Prosper Bros. Mark.Plummer
ffEM
_..
QTY
DESCRIPTION
"E'X -TEN01`1T--
PRICE
Uriif
_LMILE—
UNIT
PRICE.__
EXTENDED •
UNIT
EXTENDED
PRICE
UNIT
PRICE
UNI
PAIGE
Nb U--
__P- aLCE.,
Elbert Curtis
109 Graham St.
7,815.00
8,598.00
7,608.80
8,875.00
082 -04 -o6
....
.... .... .... ...
... .... ..
.. .... ....
Grace Lipscomb
1004 Johnson St.
81800.00
8,909.00
8,782.67
6,900.00
#82 -03 -09
Pickney Byrne
323 E. Gulf
8,800.00
8,562.00
6,967.72
9,000.00
#82 -04 -07
Myrtle Peterson
210 W. Francis St.
6,895.95
8,924.00
6,537.34
6,095.00
#82 -04 -08
GKV55 IU IAL
LESS DISC.
NET TOTAL
IIFI IV[-RY
ITL is ANNUAL GASOLINE AND DIESEL FUEL CONTRACT
//
31D. 31 -2
)ATE January 3, 1983 2:00 P.M.
CITY OF 13AYT'OWIV
B1D TABULATION
Attachment "A"
T� Nf
QTY
DESCRIPTION
Exxon
..UNIT EXTENDED
TB a um od
UNIT EXTENDED
O'Rourke Dist. Inc,
UNIT X NO 0
UNIT EXTE-+rtDE:J
PRICE ,
pqlrr PRICE
PRICF PP1rF
c p r:
1
ANNUAL GASOLINE & DIESEL FUEL FOR
+
I
PUBLIC WORKS AND POLICE DEPT.
GALLON
GALLON
NO BID
i
j
1
A. 100,000
Regular. Leaded Gasoline
0.9130
91000.00
•0.937
I 93,700.00
I
j
B.; 50,000
j Regular Unleaded Gasoline
0.9530
47,650.00
0.969 I;
48,450.00
1
C.; 100,000
#' Premium Unleaded Gasoline
1.003
100,300.00
1.01.2 !
101,200.00
D.• 50,000
No. 2. Diesel Fuel
0.9010• i
45,050.00
.992
49,600.00
TOTAL:
$284,300.00
$292,050.00
2.1
ANNUAL GASOLINE & DIESEL FUEL FOR
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT.
J 15,000
Regular Unleaded Gasoline
0.9130 l
13,695.00
.999
i
,
B.i 5,000
No. 2 Diesel Fuel
0.9010
4,505.00
1.022
.14,985.00
i 5,110.00
=
•
TOTALL
I
I
�
j
$302,500.00
$313,045.00
GROSS TOTAL
LESS DISC:
NET '" TI L
R
00
i.� xz w
�v O
w w
_9 a a e! _E m
00 2 O •a+
nL 4: N N t o O
CL
is H E E C m
cn 1,
N �� YO Ecl: _E E� CL
A p �( (A U_ EO i N C
i�
C
n
E .� N
Cd u�
� a
Q ? L(i M LL
to v). J . ...� .�. r...... ..�. ..� ��
W
— 2
a
• o
C9
Q N I_
d yr to
Z d
W W
J Z
0
Z w
Ljj
L o�
O� Wct
N m
CC
t� _ �4 z
co
11, Q a
° �
a- p ° •
w
co z W
(� W F_ cc O '
OL
V W k m
V
Q
twit 4 Z
Z
Q
1- O
O " u a 1
N •- W v l
lL� Z
p N m
p
N �}. — of c h
C • cc N V I
((//V H 0.
N -! ca
00 w
Q J
Q
. Z
Z
CO L Q
1 .O
NE •^ -�-
Q
N u
co 0)
d
``J __.... �.�.�._ »._.....___.._
�- L1.)
I-- m_ n F-
Attachment "C"
urY Or BAYTOW N
ITL`: ANNUAL FLEXIBLE BASE MATERIAL BID TABULATION
310: #9212-23 U ,
)ATE DECEMBER 29, 1982 2:00 P.M.
FE1+1
QTY
DESCRIPTION
DCLIFF MATERIALS
.UNIT EXTENDED
GULF CO LIMESTONE
•- UNIT EXTENDED
PARKER- BROTHERS CO,
UNIT X ND D
UNIT
UN! T -
I
R I 9-EL PR#r.E
P c PR LCE
pJq IC r C jE
px?tr;r
-pa ?g-c' o.
ANNUAL FLEXIBLE BASE MATERIAL
1
1. 7,000 ton
Flexible Base Material F.0.6.
!_
plantsite
9.85
68,950.00
9.40
65,800:00
9.00
63,000.00
IA. 7, 000 ton
ALTERNATE: Flexible Base
1 Material F.O.B. 1601 West
1 Main St., Baytown,
12,95
90,650.00
12,40 (
860800.00
11.93
i 83,510.00
DELIVERY:
AS REQU
.STED
AS NEE
ED
1 DAY A.R.O.
i
GROSS TOTAL
LESS DISC
NET Tip L
n�1ttf fn' 0,•a
CITY OF BAYTOWN
rI TL E: ANNUAL BRASS FITTINGS CONTRACT PAGE 2
#8212-18
13ID T n p V' L H TI O V
3! D -
).ATE. -December 9, 1982 2:00 P.M.
rEtis rNO
(TTY DESCRIPTION .EXTENDED UNIT or ENDED UN/ X ND D UNIT EA'TEt1D:,J U.i %T Zx'c� *:.•
r .i c i s p r: ^air c 1 a;
j
1 ANNUAL BRASS FITTINGS CONTRACT CONT BID
• I t I
t � '
GROSS TOTAL
LESS DISC~
NET TOTA L
- -- -- - -- - -
Attachment "E"
CITY OF BAYTOW N
-1 TL : ANNUAL PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES CONTRACT BID TABULATION
31D'"#8212-19 .
4 T E. -DECEMBER 14, 1982 2:00 P.M. '
FEM
QTY
DESCRIPTION
SOUTH SIDE CAMERA
.UNIr
EXTENDED
UNIT
f EXTENDED
UNIT
E77ENDED
UNIT
EXTEU ED
Ur:: T
ANNUAL PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
I
CONTRACT, per specifications.
$12,719.00
j
1
I
i
DELIVERY:
30 DAYS
ARO
II
I
'
I
1
1
i
GROSS TOTAL
LESS DISC:
NET TA L
"G"
cay Or BA YTO W ry Attachment
-ANNUAL WATER METER CONTRACT PAGE ONE U ID TABULATION
(D; #8212 -21
>ATE= 'DECEMBER 22, 1982 2:00 P.M.
-EM
QTY
DESCRIPTION
HERSEY PRODUCTS
ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL
UTILITY SUPPLY
NEPTUNE WATER METER
£x7E.�p J
ERNIE BRADLEY _
Unr,r £XT£NDEp
W�r1T EXTENDED
UN! ENDED
UNrT
ur;;1'
C.
PpIrr
ANNUAL WATER METER CONTRACT, per
specificAtions.
1. 800
5/8 x 3/4"
32.81
1
26,248.
29,13
1 23,304.
28.20 22,560.
27.80 22,240.
*25.50 120,400.
2. 50
j 1"
81.18
4,059.
66.0
3,300..
72.00 3,600.
70.00 3,500.
x49.50 :2,425.
3. 30
i l"
189.30
5,679.
200.00
6,000.
190.00 j 5,700.
151.00 4,530
145.00 4,350.
4. 5
2"
261.00 1
1,305.
295.00
1,475.
274.00 1 1,370.
205.00 1,025.
198.00 990•
5•� 2
2" Compound •
686.00
1,372.
640.00
1,280.
30.00 1,260.
980.00 i 1,960.
NO BID
6. 1
3" Compound
1011.00
1,011.
905.00
905.
925.00 925..
1425.00 1,425.
NO BID
7. 1
4" Compound *
1503.00
1,503•
[240.00 595.00
1,595.
1530.00 1,530•
11100.00 1,800.
NO BID
8.1 45
2" Turbine
247.00
11,115•
10,800.
234.00 10,530.
26.00 10,170.
NO BID
9.i 10
3" Turbine
389.00
3,890.-
385.00
3,850.
367.00 3,670.
334.00 3,340•
NO BID
10• i 3
4" Turbine
577.00
1,731.
803.00
I 2,409.
701.00 2,103.
643.00 = 1,929•
NO "BID
11.3 2
6" Turbine
1481.00 i
2,962.
1900.00
3,800.
1840.00 3,680.
1305.00 2,610.
NO BID
12.! 2
Fire Hydrant Meter - 3"
496.00
992.
450.00
900..
385.00 770.
350.00 700.',
390.00 780.
13. 1
Fire Service Meter - 6"
2494.00
2,494.
2390.00
2,390.
2385.00 2,385.
1960.00 .1,960.
NO BID
14. 1
Fire Service Meter - 10"
5230.00
5,230.
4780.00
4,780.
4750.00 4,750.
NO BID
NO BID
TOTAL:
$64,833.00
$57,189.00
$28,995.01
$69,591.00
$66,788.00
.
DELIVERY:
30 - 45
DAYS
30 -60 DA.S
STOCK - 30 DAYS
35 DAYS
14 DAYS
i
GROSS TOTAL
LESS DISC
NET TOT.A L
Act 10
*Meter does not meet
specs. Has 2 registers
instead of one.
*5/8" s 1" meters
do not meet specs.
Meters have plasti
external parts.
TITLE: Rear Loading Solid Waste Collection Vehicles
BID: - #8212 -26 .
DATE: December 27, 1982 2:00 p.m.
CITY OF BAYTOWN Attachment "F"
BID TABULATION
ITEM
QTY
DESCRIPTION
D avis
Ch KUNIT
UNITTruEXTENDED
EXTENDED
UNIT
EXTENDED
-PRICF
UNIT
PRICF
EXTENDED
PRICE
UNIT
EXTENDS
2
REAR LOADING SOLID WASTE COLLECT70N
_PRICF
VEHICLES, per specifications.
46,485.0
92,970-00
47,726.00
95,452.00
47,449.0
94,899.80
MODEL:
1983 FO FD
1983 Chevrolet
1983 International
:LN8000
C7DO42
S -1954
F- •.4000
e i 1
20 cubi c
yard.
DELIVERY:
-15 DAYS
ARO
150 DAYS
ARO
60 -90 D
YS ARO
UrVU00 1 V IfiL
LESS DISC.
NET TOTA L
DEL ;ERY
I
i17-L `_ ANNUAL CEMENT STABILIZED SAND-CONTRACT
91D.- 1/8212 -17
ID4 E. DECEMBER 8, 1982 2:00 P.M.
TENfl QTY DESCRIPTION
1. 3000 TONS 11 SK-Ton Cement.
2. 1000 TONS 2 SK -ton Cement Stabilized Sand
3.i 500 TONS1 21 SK -Ton Cement Stabilized Sand
TOTAL:
PLANT LOCATION:
DISTANCE FROM 1200 LEE DRIVE
GROSS TOTAL
LESS DISC
NET TOTA L
f1 �' s Tyr � K •
CITY OF 13RYTOW N
E31D TABULATION
ANAHUAC TOWING
KEOWN SUPPLY
. ivi r
P NITS
I EXTENDED
EXTENDED
16.15 $48,450.00
15.00
$45,000.00
18.05 $181050.00
16.75
$16,750.00
I
19.75 ! $ 9,875.00
i
18.75
$ 9,375.00
t
$76, 375.00 *$71,125.00
HWY 146 1 CEDAR BAYOU BEAUMON , TEXAS
8 Miles - -*Departmept says dista ce
too far o travel wit
Sta b ill d Sand.
Attachment "H"
tXTEU.- -,0 UN!T FXTcr.:..
I I
II
1 1
I
t :
i
i ITL": ANNUAL WATER METER CONTRACT PAGE TWO
31D: 8212-21
SATE.- . DECEMBER 22' 1982 2 :00 P.M.
CITY OF 13AYTOW IV
BID TABULATION
TE11�i QTY
DESCRIPTION
COMPANY
PROHAN
I
EXTENDED
P IVIT�
EXTENDED
uNIT x No D
UNIT ExTp u �j
UJU!T rX7 *v'
.
I
ANNUAL WATER METER CONTRACT per
specifications
I
1. 800
5/8" x 3/4"
*27.75
22,200.00
i
1
2. i 50
11"
*71.50 I
3,575.00
1
3. 30
list
*175.00
5,250.00
4. 5
2"
`236.00 I
a ,180.00
5 2
2" Compound
929.50
1,858.00
6. 1
3" Compound
1087.00
1,087.00
7. 1
4" Compound
1713.00
1,713.00
8. 45
2" Turbine
251.00
.11,295.00
9. I 10
3" Turbine.
476.00
4,760.00
10. ( 3
4" Turbine
894.00
2,682.00
Il. 2
6" Turbine
1550.00 i
3,100.00
i2. 2
Fire Hydrant Meter - 3"
NO BID
3• 1
Fire Hydrant Meter - 6"
NO BID
I
4. 1
Fire Service Meter - 10"
NO BID
1
TOTAL:
$58,700.00
DELIVER
10 -15 DAYS
1
I
,
VrTVJJ I V IHL *5 /ts ", 1 ", lil , and 2" Meters
LESS DISC~ do not meet specifications..
NET "' ?TA L Meters have external plastic parts.
9
_ CITY OF 13AYTOW N
f ITLis I TON PICKUP TRUCKATILITY DEPT. E31D TABULATION
3ID= #831 -27
DATE: • JANUARY 5, 1983 PAGE TWO
TEM QTY DESCRIPTION PBOBROBERTSON CHEV. XTENDEO UNIT EXTENDED UNIT UNIT EXTEr,ro:E� Ut +'T
r. I
1. 1 TON PICKUP TRUCK FOR UTILITY 1
1 I
DEPT., per specifications. 8,208.09 i
i MODEL: CHEVROLEt S -10 I
DELIVERY: 100 DAYSiARO
" 1 i
j
1 I
GROSS TOTAL
LESS DISC
NET `I"OTA L
A xr o 7ki c o o lf
T ITON PICKUP TRUCK/UTILITY DEPT,
#8 31-27
)ATE JANUARY 5, 1983 PAGE 1 of
CITY OF SAY-TOWN
BID TABULATION
Attachment "I"
TEM
QTY
DESCRIPTION
BAYTOWN DATSUN
KNAPP CHEVROLET
SAN JACINTO FORD
BAYSHORE DODGE
BAYTOWN•]10TORS
-UNIT
EXTENDED
UNIT
EXTENDED
UNI T
END-ED
UNIT
EXTE.11DEa
UU.-T EX:ci:.
1
P& CE
,
PRIer
e
pptrF,
^a•r'r a: #-%
1. 1
TON PICKUP TRUCK FOR UTILITY
(
I
DEPT., per specifications. -
NO BID
8,322.00
8 103.37
8,554.20
1 8,261.9
ALTERNATES:
IALTERNATE:
ALTERNATE:
I ALTERNATE:
8,335.19
8,333.30
8,196.00
i
MODEL:
i
CHEVROLET
FORD RANGER
;DODGE D -150
�GMC 515
--
_
ALT CSl
603
Alt. F-100
ALT. TO OTA
DELIVERY:
30-DAYS IRO
90 DAYS ARO
60 DAYS ARO
60 DAYS kRO
GROSS TOTAL
LESS DISC
NET , 'v TAL
n r I_. ; p ' •
9
FI TL L: ANNUAL CONCRETE PIPE CONTRACT
31D: #8212 -22
)ATE= - DECEMBER 28, 1982 2:00 P.M.
TEM!
QTY
6,675.00
DESCRIPTION
19,114.00
5.76
i 10,368.00
ANNUAL CONCRETE PIPE CONTRACT,
89670.00
per specifications.
j
1.
1,500
ft.
12"
R.C.P. - T & G
2.
3,800
ft.
j 15"
R.C.P. - T 6 G
3.
1,800
ft.
18"
R.C.P. - T 6 G
4.
1,000
ft,
24"
R.C.P. - T E G
5.
500
ft.
30"
R.C.P. - T E G
5.
10o
ft.
36"
R.C.P. - T & G
3
I
1
TOTAL:
s
i
DELIVERY:
GROSS TOTAL
LESS DISC
NET IOTA L
CITY Or 13AYTOWN
[31D TABULATION
FF
rvr
4.45
I
6,675.00
5.03
19,114.00
5.76
i 10,368.00
8.67
89670.00
12.40
6,200.00
17.88
1,788.00
, 1,846.00
$52,815.00
5 DAYS
TARO
UN
5.01
5.65
6.46
9.70
NO
NO
7,515.00
21,470.00
11,628.00
9,700:00
BID
BID
i$50,313.00
ON REOLEST
DOES TIME I]M
ME SPEFICATIONSERI DTEM$OT �11) ON ALL
ITE
4.58
5.24
5.99
8.99
12.84
18.49
I DAY
6,870.00
19,912.00
10,782.00
8,990.00
6,420.00
1,849.00
$54,823.00
Attachment "K"
NO B I D
r;
ENERAL CONCRETE
_S54t581_o0
} DAY
H
I
4.59
t
6,885.00
5.21
19,798.00
5.94
10,692.00
8.96-
8,960.00
12.80
1 6,400.00
18.46
, 1,846.00
_S54t581_o0
} DAY
H
TITLE. Annual calcium Hypochlorite
BID: _ 831 -25
DATE: January 4, 1983
CITY OF BAYTO WN
BID TABULATION
Attachment "J"
ITEM
Q TY
DESCRIPTION
Van Waters &Rogers
Thompson Hayward Chem
McKesson Chemical
Norain Supply Co.
UNIT
EXTENDED
UNIT
EXTENDED
UNIT
EXTENDED
UNIT
EXTENDED
UNIT
EXTEND[
1.
100 1b.
CALCIUM HYPOCHLORITE '
99.29
12,411.25
108.00
13,500.00
130.08
16,260.00
135:00
16,875.00
\ DELIVERY:
1-2 DAYS
ARO
2 -3- DAYS
ARO
2 -3.DA
S ARO
6 DAYS
ARO
r%n r% t-% -r ^-rn I
V /%IJJJ 1 V IHL.
LESS DISC..
NET TOTAL
nFl -/FRY
o
d�
Q
IL Q
J �—
Q
h a3
v
y
.W
V
a
a
r �
a
H
0 0
U••
N
W
H
p� N
co
WH
00.
z N
O
U N W
Q, N
M r•1 W
z N U
z GD W
Q --w 0
LAj W
�oeT
J
o..J
cvn �
� W��
V�
.7
n
r ;� t
y
WQ
LAJ
Z
x
k
'
2
'
O
W
•
�-
W
tiL
0
w
0
w_
o
W
}_4
0
z
L
C
'
c �•
W
o
z
Li
LAJ
a
U
0.
(f)
W
W
W
Q
U
Z
O
v
Cy
Lij
J
o..J
cvn �
� W��
r�
_i
(4-s 7- R t
s._
Dom•.
w
Q
oe c
Gr9a
4 _r
.O
racy
r.
V
l � W
v i
,till¢ y'�1,,9,MYaMf.d
'
3.
,N a
j..
r 1l1 �
a
rr
ro
n
CD
M
r
T
N
6.P Ac.
�
6.A Ae.
zo
V
19'
S.O Ac.
_S_
p
o .
w
Q
oe c
Gr9a
4 _r
.O
racy
r.
V
l � W
v i
,till¢ y'�1,,9,MYaMf.d
'
3.
,N a
j..
r 1l1 �
a
rr
ro
n
CD
M
r
1p '
A D
1
'c2
6.P Ac.
ZI
6.A Ae.
zo
S,nAC.
19'
S.O Ac.
o .
n
1p '
A D
1