Loading...
1983 01 13 CC Minutes30113 -1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN January 13, 1983 The City Council of the City of Baytown, Texas, met in regular session on Thursday, January 13, 1983, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the Baytown City Hall with the following attendance: Fred T. Philips Councilman Jimmy Johnson Councilman Perry M. Simmons Councilman Mary E. Wilbanks Councilwoman Roy L. Fuller Councilman Allen Cannon Councilman Emmett 0. Hutto Mayor Fritz Lanham City Manager Larry Patterson Assistant City Manager Randy Strong City Attorney Eileen P. Hall City Clerk The meeting was called to order with a quorum present, and the following business was transacted: Consider Minutes for Regular Meeting Held December 9, 1982 and Special Meeting Held December 14, 1982 Councilman Philips suggested that the wording "Council took no formal action" be added as the last sentence on Page 21209 -11 and moved approval of the minutes with that addition; Councilman Simmons seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None Receive Petitions No petitions were presented at this time. City Manager's Report Safety Bulletin - Council was provided with a copy of a safety bulletin which indicated for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1982, there was a twenty (20 %) percent reduction in employees' on- the -job injury and a twenty -nine (29 %) percent reduction in incident rate. Mr. Lanham commented that the safety program is effective and does receive support of the employees. cpl 30113 -2 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983 Houston Lighting and Power Company - The cost comparisons provided by the company for January compared to November and December reflected cost of $66.64 for a user of 1,000 KWH compared to $78.01 for November and $76.54 for December. Councilman Cannon pointed out that in the month of October, there was an over recovery of $25,000,000 of which Houston Lighting and Power Company's customers received no rebate. Councilman Philips stated that he would hope that the PUC under Governor White's direction would move toward making the company more accountable for the efficient use of fuel, as well as purchase at the best price. West District Wastewater Treatment Plant - Final inspection of this facility was accomplished on January 12 by the consulting engineer and representatives of the City of Baytown. All was determined to be in order. A change order was approved on the project in the West District which Naylor is performing and a new completion schedule has been submitted with a completion date of April 7, 1983. Other rehabilitation work that is underway in the West District is about seventy -eight (78 %) percent complete. Sliplining - Sliplining in the area of East James, East Texas and Roseland Oaks is about seventy -two (72 %) percent complete. The other sliplining contract which involves the sliplining of lines in Eva Maud, Whispering Pines and along Alexander Drive has been completed. Caldwell Street - This contract has been completed with exception of cleanup. 1982 Street Improvement Program - For the most part this project is complete with the exception of Aron Street. All other streets have been surfaced. Cleanup does remain on the project. Glen Meadow Drainage Project - This project is about thirty (30 %) percent complete. Drainage Work by City Crews - City crews have been working in the Pringle -Rotan Subdivision performing extensive drainage work. That work is about fifty (50 %) percent complete. The drainage work along Milner, Oakwood and Hardin Road is about twenty -five (25 %) percent complete. The work along Hunt, South Road, Ferry Road and Market Street is completed. Ponderosa /Craigmont Water Line Replacement - All the line has been laid and the contractor is in the process of pressure testing the system. After the pipe passes the pressure testing, service connections will be made. Questions and Comments from Council In response to an inquiry from Council regarding the status of the sign ordinance, Mr. Lanham stated that it would be necessary to have another work session and that he would hope to be ready for that in another two weeks. �"� 30113 -3 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983 Mr. Lanham, in response to Council inquiry, explained that the work on East James Street is being performed by city crews and a contractor. The contractor has installed about 490 feet of pipe on East James and has about 300 feet remaining. There were major obstructions in the line which had to be eliminated prior to performing sliplining. City crews are open cutting and installing intermediate portions of sewer pipe (about 300 feet) that could not be sliplined. Twenty -five (250) percent of the work has been completed. Councilman Cannon brought up the fact that the Lemley baby had been rejected for treatment in Houston and suggested some thought by Council as to what could be done to cure that situation. Council determined that the Administration should be in contact with the local medical association in this regard and that the county should be encouraged to take a hard look at the capacity for care of premature infants. Consider Authorization to Advertise for Bids for City of Baytown's Insurance Needs Council had previously been furnished with a copy of the report prepared by The Wyatt Company on risk management and insurance program for the City of Baytown. Council had discussed that report during a work session prior to the Council meeting and had reviewed specifications. The Admin- istration recommended that Council authorize the advertisement for bids for City of Baytown's insurance coverage. Councilman Fuller moved that the Administration be authorized to advertise for bids for City of Baytown insurance coverage in line with the study performed by The Wyatt Company; Councilman Cannon seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None Consider Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -1, Abandoning a Portion of North Sixth Street The Administration was contacted by a person representing the property owner regarding a two -foot encroachment into the City of Baytown's street right of way on Sixth Street. All utility companies have been contacted and report that it would be no problem for the encroachment to be abandoned. An appraisal was performed. The Administration recommended Council approval and payment by the property owner of $100, which is the minimum payment allowable by ordinance for abandonment of city -owned property. The tract of land being considered for abandonment is 21.4 feet in length and 2.1 feet in width. The building encroaching on the property is a garage. The property is in process of being sold and the title company is insisting the matter be resolved. Councilman Johnson moved for adoption of the ordinance; ® , Councilman Philips seconded the motion. The vote follows: 30113 -4 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983 Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 3533 -A AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, PROVIDING THAT A PORTION OF NORTH SIXTH STREET BE VACATED, ABANDONED AND CLOSED: PROVIDING FOR THE QUITCLAIMING OF THE CITY'S INTEREST IN SAID LAND: AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Consider Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -2, Authorizing a Contract with First Presbyterian Church of Goose Creek for Operation and Maintenance of Transporation Program Council had authorized the support of the operation and maintenance of transportation program for senior citizens to the extent of $15,000 from revenue sharing funds and $11,000 toward the senior citizens nutrition center for hot meals. These two contracts are annual contracts. Randy Strong, City Attorney, explained that on prior contracts, the City had required the contractor to carry Public Liability and Property Damage insurance with limits of $100,000; $300,000 and $100,000. That has been changed in compliance with the recommendation of the insurance consultant to a $500,000 combined single limit. This is the only change in the contract. Councilman Simmons moved for adoption of the ordinance; Councilman Cannon seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 3534 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST TO A CONTRACT WITH FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF GOOSE CREEK FOR THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF TRANSPORATION PROGRAM AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Consider Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -3, Authorizing a Contract with First Presbyterian Church of Goose Creek to support Baytown Senior Citizens' Nutrition Center Councilwoman Wilbanks moved for adoption of the ordinance; Councilman Fuller seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto _m Nays: None 30113 -5 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983 ORDINANCE NO. 3535 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST TO A CONTRACT WITH FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF GOOSE CREEK FOR HOT NOON MEALS TO THE ELDERLY AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Hold Public Hearing on Protest of Application for Wine and Beer Retailer's Permit at 100 West Baker Road Mayor Hutto called the public hearing to order concerning the application for Wine and Beer Retailer's Permit at 100 West Baker Road. All those persons interested in testi- fying during the hearing were given ample opportunity to sign the register in the lobby. Afterwhich, Mayor Hutto administered the oath to those desiring to testify. He explained that the hearing was being conducted in compliance with Section 4.14 of the Code of Ordinance and Section 1141 of the Alcoholic Beverage Code for the purpose of receiving evidence and public input prior to making a recommendation, if any, to the Alcoholic Beverage Commission. Mayor Hutto encouraged each speaker to be brief and to the point and informed those present that a recording was being made of the proceeding. Knox Askins, Attorney for Angel Brothers, Inc., applicant for Wine and Beer Retailer's Permit at 100 West Baker Road, spoke in favor of the application on behalf of Angel Brothers. First, he stated that the application is framed as an on- premise beer license for a facility which will be a combination convenience grocery store, self- service gasoline station. The applicants presently have three establishments of this type in Baytown and have been in this type business in Baytown for about 15 years. The reason for the application for an on- premises license, even though this will not be a club or lounge is that it is quite common for those in this type business to secure on- premise rather than off - premise beer license for the reason that if a customer purchases a beer in one of the stores and opens the beer before leaving the property lines of the establishment, this is considered to be consumption on premises. Although the applicant has no intention to have a sit -down facility, in keeping with almost every convenience store owner /operator, application is being made for on- premise permit as a matter of protection. Mr. Askins emphasized that this application was in no manner an application to operate a lounge and the applicant would have no objection if Council were to approve the application contingent that no lounge -type operation would exist at that location. The location of the establishment is 100 West Baker Road which is near the intersection of North Main Street in a heavily developed commercial area. Mr. Askins pointed out that the petition contained only five signatures of persons residing within 300 feet of the proposed location and that there are no churches or schools within that distance. 30113 -6 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983 He stated that from reading the petition, it appeared that the signers were objecting to the sale of alcoholic beverages at this location whether on or off - premise. He reminded Council that the issue is not wet /dry since the voters of Baytown had decided that Baytown would be a "wet area." The petition cites a number of violations all but two belong to Mr. Angel's brother. This record is extremely good since the chances are that someone with false identifi- cation could purchase beer illegally at anytime. Since, in Mr. Askin's opinion, there was no evidence presented within the petition that would be relevant reason to deny the applicant, and since the applicants have an excellent record as citizens of Baytown and businessmen, he urged that Council vote favorably on the application. In response to an inquiry from Council, Mr. Askins stated that to his knowledge, the applicant had complied with all requirements of the City. Councilman Johnson pointed out that Mr. Angel would probably construct the facility at that location whether Council voted favorably on this application or not. Mr. Askins responded that the applicant would need Council approval since he did intend to sell beer. W. M. Green, 11 Dent, Baytown, Texas, referred to the petition and the six (6) items specified in the petition as examples of what could happen with an on- premise license at that location. He pointed out that once the application would be approved, the applicant could elect to set up tables and allow people to congregate and drink on the parking area. If this were to happen, there would be cases of intoxication which would be a hindrance to others. He also pointed out that this location is adjacent to a residential area and very near Sterling High School. There are small children that wait adjacent to this business for school buses. Theresa Moore, 2 Dent, explained that her residence is across from the proposed location and her property is bounded by the business on one side. Mrs. Moore stated that the manner in which the driveway into the business has been poured would cause the residents some concern with an on- premise license, along with the fact that there are children who will be riding bikes in that area and who will be waiting for school buses at that location. Mrs. Moore feared that the children would be endangered. In response to inquiry from Council, the City Attorney explained that Council does have the authority by State law to approve applications for the sale of beer. Therefore, in this case, rather than simply making a recommendation to the County Judge and Alcoholic Beverage Commission, Council would be making a determination as to the sale of beer at that location. Councilman Philips stated that in most cases in the past when Council has reviewed applications for alcoholic beverage permits, the situations involved protecting the peace where a tavern has caused problems in the neighborhood due to noise, parking and other problems related to a tavern -type operation. In hearing both sides, Councilman Philips stated 30113 -7 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983 that he was not convinced that denying the application would change the circumstances in the neighborhood. There are already alcoholic beverages available for sale at nearby outlets. The fact that the applicant is saying that no lounge atmosphere or music will be provided to encourage people to stay at that location and consume alcoholic beverages persuaded him to say that the applicant would be doing a minimum thing with sale of alcoholic beverages, would be keeping the peace and would not create a tavern -type atmosphere there. For those reasons, Councilman Philips moved to approve the application for on- premise license. Councilman Fuller stated that legally he could see no (0"®* way that the application could be denied. Councilman Philips reiterated that approving or denying the application will not change the circumstances that there are outlets existing in the area for sale of alcoholic beverages. Councilman Simmons stated that there is legislation being proposed that would preclude any convenience -type store unless there are provisions made for seats and tables being granted an on- premise permit. Councilman Fuller seconded the motion. Councilman Cannon stated that he could support application for an off- premise license, but because of the nearness of the high school, he could not support an on- premise license. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, and Fuller Mayor Hutto Nays: Councilman Cannon Mayor Hutto closed the public hearing and recessed for five minutes. When the meeting reconvened, the following business was transacted: Consider Proposed Resolution Nos. 824, 825, 826 and 827, Approving Creation of San Jacinto Place Utility District Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 Respectively Council held a work session previously with representa- tives of Pacer Development Company regarding the possible formation of four municipal utility districts in the vicinity of San Jacinto Mall. During that work session, discussion centered around the fact that the owners would like to form municipal utility districts in order to provide funds for a portion of development costs. The owners have indicated a willingness, if the City of Baytown would permit the formation of these districts, to permit Baytown to annex the areas. At the time of annexation by the city, the districts would discontinue taxation. The Administration did meet with representatives of Pacer Development on several occasions. The documents presented to Council prior to the meeting are based on those meetings and the staff feels that Baytown's interests are protected, along with those of the developer. 30113 -8 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983 Randy Strong, City Attorney, reviewed the documents for Council. He mentioned that the initial document as to each district is the petition to the city that a municipal utility district be created which documents describe the general nature of the work to be performed in each district - - construction of waterworks, sanitary sewer systems and drainage systems, along with estimated costs for development. Attached to the petition is a description of the area being proposed for inclusion in the municipal utility district, along with a resolution for Council consideration to create each of the four districts. This resolution is very similar to past resolutions presented for creation of municipal utility districts. The resolution contains the City's requirements and conditions under which the district may issue bonds and what interest rate at which those bonds may be issued. The resolution specifies that the Director of Public Works must approve plans and specifications for construction of water, sanitary sewer and drainage facilities within the district. Those facilities are required to be constructed in accordance with City of Baytown specifications, and the resolution allows the city to inspect during construction. Prior to the sale of any lot or parcel within the district, approval of the Planning Commission must be obtained, a plat must be recorded in the Deed Records of Harris County and the district must otherwise comply with all rules and regulations of the Planning Department. Added to these particular resolutions, is the provision that prior to any of the districts issuing bonds or other obligations that are to be paid out of revenues, the districts must submit for City Council review and approval a water and sewer rate feasibility study. Another condition of the resolutions is following creation of the district and prior to the sale of bonds, the districts will sign the allocation agreements attached to the resolutions. The allocation agreement is very similar for all four of the districts. What this does is allow the city at some point in the future to annex the district, bring it within the city limits of the City of Baytown and tax the property. The district would continue to exist as a separate district, providing water and sewer service to its customers to allow the district time to pay off its bonded indebtedness. In effect, the city would be annexing the district but would not be assuming its bonded indebtedness. The city will contract with the districts to provide sewer service. The districts will obtain water from Baytown Area Water Authority. Under the allocation agreements, initially the districts would not be annexed. There would be some time period before the city would annex the district. During that period the district would collect ad valorem taxes. Upon annexation, the district would cease the collection of ad valorem taxes. However, the district would continue to collect revenues for water and sewer service to pay for bonded indebtedness. Article I of the allocation agreement provides that upon repayment of all the district's obligation, the district and the city will take steps necessary to dissolve the district. Earlier in that article, requirements are discussed. One requirement is that the city may not annex the district at all until at least ninety (900) percent of the facilities 30113 -9 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983 for which bonds have been issued have been installed or annexation may take place after some specified time period. Article 1182 -c.1 of State law specifies that the only step necessary to dissolve a district is for City Council by two - thirds majority vote to pass an ordinance dissolving the district. Upon this dissolution, the city would take over the assets of the district. The Administration recommended approval of the proposed resolutions. Mr. Lanham called Council's attention to the fact that the allocation agreement provided that the city and district agreed that the city may annex all of the territory within the district at the earlier of such time as at least ninety (90%) percent of the facilities for which district bonds had been authorized are installed, or five years after the date of issuance of any obligations to finance the facilities. The Administration requested Council guidance in that regard. Mr. Lanham mentioned that the only existing similar situation is the Industrial Districts where the policy is that in the case of new industries, no taxes are paid the first year and 1/3 of the anticipated value is paid the second, third and fourth years, which provides a four -year moratorium. Councilman Fuller moved to adopt the proposed resolutions with the modification in the allocation agreements that the time at which the City may annex be four years rather than five. Councilman Philips seconded the motion. Dan Sharp, representative of Pacer Development, was present and indicated the company would be agreeable with this modification. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None RESOLUTION NO. 824 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS GRANTING CONSENT AS PROVIDED BY TEXAS REVISED CIVIL STATUTES ARTICLE 97a, TO THE FORMATION OF A MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF SECTION 54.016, TEXAS WATER CODE, TO BE KNOWN AS SAN JACINTO PLACE MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1, AND EMBRACING WITHIN ITS BOUNDARIES 81 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, IN HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID AREA BEING HEREIN MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS IN EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO, UPON THE CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS HEREIN STATED. RESOLUTION NO. 825 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS GRANTING CONSENT AS PROVIDED BY TEXAS REVISED CIVIL STATUTES ARTICLE 970a, TO THE FORMATION OF A MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF SECTION 54.016, TEXAS WATER CODE, TO BE KNOWN AS SAN JACINTO PLACE MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 2, AND EMBRACING WITHIN ITS BOUNDARIES 78 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, IN HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID AREA BEING HEREIN MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS IN EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO, UPON THE CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS HEREIN STATED. 30113 -10 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983 RESOLUTION NO. 826 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS GRANTING CONSENT AS PROVIDED BY TEXAS REVISED CIVIL STATUTES ARTICLE 970a, TO THE FORMATION OF A MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF SECTION 54.016, TEXAS WATER CODE, TO BE KNOWN AS SAN JACINTO PLACE MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 3, AND EMBRACING WITHIN ITS BOUNDARIES 122 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, IN HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID AREA BEING HEREIN MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS IN EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO, UPON THE CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS HEREIN STATED. RESOLUTION NO. 827 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS GRANTING CONSENT AS PROVIDED BY TEXAS REVISED CIVIL STATUES ARTICLE 970a, TO THE FORMATION OF A MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF SECTION 54.016, TEXAS WATER CODE, TO BE KNOWN AS SAN JACINTO PLACE MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 4, AND EMBRACING WITHIN ITS BOUNDARIES 108 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, IN HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID AREA BEING HEREIN MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS IN EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO, UPON THE CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS HEREIN STATED. Consider Approval of Grant Amendment for Central Sewer District Systematic Sewer System Evaluation Survey Council took action previously to apply for a grant to continue the Central District work. Ivan Langford, Consulting Engineer, explained that approval was being sought for grant amendment in order that the city may proceed with participation in the EPA Construction Grant Program for performing the Central Sewer District Systematic Sewer System Evaluation Survey. This was done in the West District and as a result of that, the city obtained grant funds for sewer system rehabilitation. This was not done in the East District because it would not have been cost effective under EPA formula. However, the city is still attempting to rehabilitate sewer lines on basis of deterioration in the East District. The estimated costs for the Systematic Sewer System Evaluation Survey would be $496,269.24, which includes fixed fee contract of $32,000 for engineering services. If the grant amendment is acceptable, EPA will pay seventy -five (750) percent of the $496,269.24, leaving $124,067.31 as the city's share. The city's portion will be funded from the Sanitary Sewer Grant Fund. The survey will consist basically of smoke testing the Central Sewer District, limited televising (between 5% to 10 %), cleaning of lines, quantification testing, field evaluations, a physical inspection of all manholes that can be located, noting the condition of the manhole and the materials that the manhole is composed of. Some of the manholes will not be located, but where sewers come together, there should be a manhole. Some manholes will not be entered because of structurally bad conditions. 30113 -11 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983 Council had previously dropped the Central District from the EPA Grant Program but it was determined that seventy -five (75 %) percent funding could be available. Once the study is made, the city can go forward to complete the facility plan and the Environmental Assessment to complete the Step 1 services for the Central Sewer District. In response to an inquiry from Council, Mr. Langford stated that the engineers must furnish documentation as to all costs. Mr. Lanham mentioned that the City of Baytown would have an individual to monitor the contract. The Administration recommended approval of grant amendment for Central Sewer District Systematic Sewer Evaluation Survey. Councilwoman Wilbanks moved for approval of grant amendment for Central Sewer District Systematic Sewer Evaluation Survey. Councilman Simmons seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None Consider Authorization to Advertise for Bids for 1982 -83 Sanitary Sewer Sliplining - Phase II Several areas of the city have been experiencing collapsed sewer line problems. Those have been put together into one program, totaling an estimated $90,000. Areas involved are 1400 linear feet of 12 inch line on West Sterling from South Jones to Felton; 358 feet of 12 inch line on Defee from Felton to Hemphill; 245 feet of 12 inch line on Hemphill from Defee to West Texas; 1440 of 6 inch line between West Main and Bolster from Thibodaux to Lee Drive; 460 feet of 6 inch pipe on Linwood, 460 feet of 8 inch pipe on Linwood. The Administration requested authorization to advertise for bids. Councilman Simmons moved to authorize the Administration to advertise for bids for 1982 -83 Sanitary Sewer Sliplining - Phase II; Councilman Philips seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None Consider Proposed Ordinance, Awarding Annual Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Contract The ordinance was written to provide Council with the option of awarding the contract; however, the Administration recommended that bids be rejected and that the Administration be authorized to advertise for bids on another basis. 30113 -12 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983 The City of Baytown requests bids on gasoline and diesel fuel every year. Due to market conditions, the successful bidders have not been able to give the city a price that would be in effect for a whole year. Bids have been awarded in the past on the basis of low bidder who gave a bid that was good for thirty (30) days. After that time, the bidder could change the billing to the city as the market changed. The Purchasing Department has worked very diligently to derive a method by which the city could obtain competitive bids and at the same time have those bids tied to something. For instance, the city's depository contract bids are tied to treasury bill rates. Purchasing came up with platts oilgram pricing which the Administration felt all potential bidders were familiar with. There is a publication which comes out on a regular basis that provides this information. A pre -bid conference was held with prospective bidders and there were no objections expressed. The Administration felt the companies would be able to bid on that basis. Prior to receipt of bids, the Administration was contacted by one of the vendors indicating that that company would not be able to bid. When the bids were received, only one bid was actually received that was based on the city's specifications. A no bid was received and another company bid, but took exception to the city's specifications. Two other potential bidders indicated that they were unable to bid. Exxon felt that the bid should be tied to terminal or rack price. Dennis Trigg, owner of HTB Petroleum Products, the only company that had bid to City of Baytown specifications addressed Council. Mr. Trigg stated that standard rack pricing is what the major oil companies will sell to a given consumer at a time and place of delivery for their product. Platts oilgram is a publication which takes the average prices of products that have been traded in the previous 24- hours. When the city went out for bids, a pre -bid conference was held at City Hall. O'Roark, Exxon, Gulf and HTB all had representatives present. No one indicated that their company could not bid on that basis. HTB did bid and bid exactly to specifications. Using the base period of November 30, platts low for regular grade gasoline was $ .90 a gallon, exclusive of taxes. HTB bid this to the city at 3.7 over low water platts. Exxon stated that they could not bid on low water platt basis, but would bid the product at $ .913 per gallon as of December 30, 1982 which is 30 days after platts were issued. Gasoline in that 30 -day period dropped $ .575; therefore, HTB could have lowered their bid by $ .575 and still have come in under the Exxon bid. In response to an inquiry from Council, Mr. Trigg stated that rack price to a distributor means that the distributor can go to the refiner and purchase the product at that rack and sell to whomever. Exxon would have a rack price for a wholesale distributor, rack price for a consumer which would be the City of Baytown, and a rack price for retail service stations. That rack price is similar to platts and changes from day to day. 30113 -13 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983 In the discussion that followed, Council discussed the possibility of the City purchasing gasoline and diesel fuel as needed by calling to obtain the best-price. However, the Charter of the City of Baytown would prohibit this type purchase. Purchases of this type must be made on a formal bid basis. The possibility of bidding based on rack prices was also discussed, but it was noted that there is no publication indicating what that price would be and that price would vary from manufacturer to manufacturer. Mr. Lanham stated that he felt the plan that the Administration had developed was a good plan, but perhaps a bit premature. Mr. Trigg responded that this was not the first circumstance of a governmental body using oil platts to obtain bids because Harris County receives bids on that basis. Councilman Philips moved to rebid the contract; Councilman Simmons seconded the motion. In response to an inquiry from Council, Mr. Lanham stated that the Administration would rebid the item on rack price basis. Councilman Fuller stated that he could not support that because platts oilgram is a nationally recognized figure published daily, whereas rack prices vary from manufacturer to manufacturer on a daily basis. Mayor Hutto stated that he could support the motion if the item would be rebid on a platts oilgram basis. Councilman Philips had no problem with this. Councilman Cannon stated that he could not support that because that is the basis on which the bid was taken; Councilman Johnson concurred. Councilman Philips stated that it appeared that perhaps not all parties involved were really certain of how to bid on the basis requested. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips and Simmons Mayor Hutto Nays: Council members Johnson, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Councilman Fuller made the point that all prospective bidders were invited to a pre -bid conference where each was informed how to bid the item and there were no objections. HTB Petroleum bid the item as specified by the City of Baytown. Councilman Johnson moved to adopt the ordinance, awarding the contract to HTB Petroleum; Councilman Fuller seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None 30113 -14 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983 ORDINANCE NO. 3536 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF HTB PETROLEUM PRODUCTS FOR THE ANNUAL GASOLINE AND DIESEL FUEL CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF THREE HUNDRED THIRTEEN THOUSAND FORTY FIVE & N01100 ($313,045.00) DOLLARS. For tabulation, see Attachment "A." Consider Proposed Ordinance, Establishing School Speed Zone on Bayway Drive for Baytown Junior School The school district was contacted regarding participation in the cost of flashing signals at this location, but favored establishing a regular school speed zone. The temporary signs are in effect from 7:15 p.m. to 9:00 a.m. and from 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. The Administration, after checking with the school superintendent, recommended that the school speed zone be established for 7:30 a.m. to 8:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. The school district has requested that the crossing be painted and that for the first few days the police department pay special attention to that area. The Administration recommended approval of the ordinance. Councilman Johnson moved for adoption of the ordinance; Councilwoman Wilbanks seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None Mr. Lanham stated that the crossing would be painted and that the police department would work the crossing the first few days to call attention to the school speed zone. ORDINANCE NO. 3537 AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING A PORTION OF BAYWAY DRIVE BETWEEN HONEYSUCKLE DRIVE AND 600 FEET SOUTH OF POST OAK DRIVE A SCHOOL ZONE; CONTAINING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE; PRESCRIBING A MAXIMUM PENALTY OF TWO HUNDRED AND N01100 ($200.00) DOLLARS; AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Consent Agenda Jerry Fletcher, Community Development Planner, in response to a question from Council, explained that the problems that Mr. Plummer had been experiencing with his workers was simply a misunderstanding between he and the workers concerning on what basis the workers were to be paid. Since that time, Mr. Plummer had not used the same crew and is no longer experiencing problems. 30113 -15 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983 Councilman Simmons expressed reservations with regard to awarding the contract for Annual Concrete Pipe to General Concrete because he was not sure that that company could provide the 24 ", 30" and 36" pipe requested. He pointed out that the difference between the low bidder with 1/2 day delivery and the next low bidder with 1/2 day delivery was only $242. In an emergency situation, if the pipe is not available, this could cost the city much more than the difference in the two bids. A representative of the company was present to state that the company does stock those sizes of pipe and the company has several different places to obtain pipe. He stated that the company would honor the bid. Mr. Lanham stated that if an order is placed by the city which the company could not honor, the Administration would report to Council for further action. Councilman Simmons stated that he was of the opinion that the bid of General Concrete was the lowest, but perhaps not the best bid. Therefore, he moved to reject the low bid and that the contract be awarded to the next low bidder, Whites Supply, since Gifford Hill was disqualified due to five (5) days delivery. The motion died for lack of second. Councilman Fuller moved to adopt the ordinance awarding the annual concrete pipe contract to General Concrete Products Company; Councilman Philips seconded the motion. With regard to the question concerning the bid for purchase of a 1/2 ton pickup for the utility department, no alternate bid had been requested. The company had elected to bid an alternate for a bed which was one foot longer than specified. Since Council had determined to remove Item f from the Consent Agenda, the motion on that item was voted on after consideration of the Consent Agenda. Council considered the Consent Agenda Items a through a and g through m as follows: a. Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -6, will award the contract for the rehabilitation at 109 Graham Street. Four bids were received. Prosper Brothers submitted the low bid of $7,608.80. We recommend the low bidder, Prosper Brothers, be awarded this contract. b. Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -7, will award the contract for rehabilitation at 323 East Gulf Street. Four bids were received. Prosper Brothers submitted the low bid in the amount of $6,967.22. We recommend the low bidder, Prosper Brothers, be awarded this contract. C. Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -8, will award the contract for the rehabilitation at 210 W. Francis. Four bids were received. Mark Plummer submitted the low bid of $6,095.00 30113 -16 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983 We recommend the low bidder, Mark Plummer, be awarded this contract. d. Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -9, will award the contract for the rehabilitation at 1004 Johnston. Four bids were received. Mark Plummer submitted the low bid of $6,900.00. We recommend the low bidder, Mark Plummer be awarded this contract. e. Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -10, will award the bid for the purchase of flexible base material. Three bids were received. Parker Brothers & Company, Inc. submitted the low bid of $63,000 for 7,000 tons of flexible base material at F.O.B. plantsite ($9.00 /ton) and alternative one of $83,510 for 7,000 tons of flexible base material at F.O.B., 1601 West Main Street in Baytown ($11.93 /ton). We recommend the low bidder, Parker Brothers & Co., Inc., be awarded this contract. g. Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -12, will award the bid for annual brass fittings contract. We received six (6) bids. Jones Supply submitted the low bid of $23,209.18. However Jones Supply does indicate a delivery time of stock to eight weeks with a factory shipment. It also requires a minimum order of 500 pounds. Golden Triangle, who is the next low bid with a bid of $24,577.80 does not require a minimum order and has a delivery time which meets specifications. We recommend Golden Triangle be awarded this contract. h. Proposed Ordinance No. 3011 -13, will award the bid for the annual photographic supplies contract. We received one bid. That was the bid of Southside Camera Center in the amount of $12,719. We recommend Southside Camera Center be awarded this contract. i. Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -14, will award the bid for the purchase of rear leading solid waste collection vehicles. We received three (3) bids. Davis Trucks & Equipment submitted the low bid of $92,970. The Council has budgeted $110,000 for the purchase of these bids. We recommend the low bidder, Davis Trucks & Equipment, be awarded this contract. la 30113 -17 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983 j. Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -15, will award the bid for the annual water meter contract. We received six (6) bids on fourteen items. Various vendors were the low bidder on different items. The City's recommendations are as follows: Items 1, 8, 9, 11, 12, and 13, we recommend Neptune Water Meter Company. Items 2 and 6, we recommend Rockwell International. On items 3 and 4, we recommend Ernie Bradley Sales & Service. In items 5, 7, and 14, we recommend Utility Supply. On item 10 we recommend Hershey Products, Inc. The total bid of all these items is $60,016. k. Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -16, will award the bid for the annual cement stabilized sand contract. Two bids were received. Keown Supply submitted the low bid of $71,125. Keown Supply is located in Beaumont, Texas and is located 72 miles from Lee Drive. The Public Works Dept. feels that this distance is too far to travel with stabilized sand. This is based on the fact that stabilized sand will harden during the time involved. Therefore, we feel it is not feasible because of the time and money involved to award the bid to Keown Supply. The second lowest bid was that of Anahuac Towing and Shell in the amount of $76,375. They are located 8 miles from Lee Drive. We recommend Anahuac Towing and Shell be awarded this contract. 1. Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -17, will award the bid for a 1/2 ton pickup for the Utility Dept. Six (6) bids were received. San Jacinto Ford submitted the low bid of $8,103.37. Council has budgeted $9,550 for this purchase. We recommend the low bidder, San Jacinto Ford, be awarded this contract. M. Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -18, will award the bid for the annual calcium hypochlorite contract. We received four (4) bids. Van Waters & Rogers submitted the low bid of $12,411.25. We recommend the low bidder, Van Waters & Rogers, be awarded this contract. 30113 -18 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983 Councilman Fuller moved to adopt the Consent Agenda Items a through a and g through m; Councilman Philips seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 3538 AN ORDINANCE AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT #82 -04 -06 TO PROSPER BROTHERS FOR THE SUM OF SEVEN THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED EIGHT & 80 /100 ($7,608.80) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -6) ORDINANCE NO. 3539 AN ORDINANCE AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT #82 -04 -07 TO PROSPER BROTHERS FOR THE SUM OF SIX THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED SIXTY SEVEN & 72/100 ($6,967.72) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -7) ORDINANCE NO. 3540 AN ORDINANCE AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT #82 -04 -08 TO MARK PLUMMER FOR THE SUM OF SIX THOUSAND NINETY FIVE & N01100 ($6,095.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -8) ORDINANCE NO. 3541 AN ORDINANCE AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT #82 -03 -09 TO MARK PLUMMER FOR THE SUM OF SIX THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED & N01100 ($6,900.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -9) ORDINANCE NO. 3542 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF PARKER BROTHERS & CO., INC., FOR FLEXIBLE BASE MATERIAL AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF EIGHTY THREE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED TEN & N01100 ($83,510.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -10) ORDINANCE NO. 3543 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF GOLDEN TRIANGLE FOR THE ANNUAL BRASS FITTINGS CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF TWENTY FOUR THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED SEVENTY SEVEN & 80/100 ($24,577.80) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -12) ORDINANCE NO. 3544 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF SOUTHSIDE CAMERA CENTER FOR THE ANNUAL PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF TWELVE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED NINETEEN & N01100 ($12,719.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -13) 30113 -19 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983 ORDINANCE NO. 3545 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF DAVIS TRUCKS & EQUIPMENT FOR REAR LOADING SOLID WASTE COLLECTION VEHICLES AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF NINETY TWO THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED SEVENTY & N01100 ($92,970.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -14) ORDINANCE NO. 3546 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF NEPTUNE WATER METER COMPANY, ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL, ERNIE BRADLEY SALES & SERVICE, UTILITY SUPPLY, AND HERSHEY PRODUCTS, INC. FOR THE ANNUAL WATER METER CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF FIFTY NINE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED THIRTY SIX & N01100 ($59,836.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -15) ORDINANCE NO. 3547 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF ANAHUAC TOWING & SHELL FOR THE ANNUAL CEMENT STABILIZED SAND CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF SEVENTY SIX THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED SEVENTY FIVE & N01100 ($76,375.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -16) ORDINANCE NO. 3548 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF SAN JACINTO FORD FOR 1/2 TON PICKUP TRUCK AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF EIGHT THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED THREE & 37/100 ($8,103.37) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -17) ORDINANCE NO. 3549 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF VAN WATERS & ROGERS FOR THE ANNUAL CALCIUM HYPOCHLORITE CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF TWELVE THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED ELEVEN & 25/100 ($12,411.25) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -18) For tabulations, see Attachments "B" through "J." Previously, Council had considered Consent Agenda Item f as follows: f. Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -11, will award the bid for annual concrete pipe contract. We received six (6) bids. General Concrete Products Company submitted the lowest and best bid for the sum of $54,581. Monroe Farrell did not bid all the items and Gifford Hill has a 5 day delivery time which for this type of supplies is unacceptable. We recommend General Concrete Products Company be awarded this contract. 30113 -20 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983 Councilman Fuller had moved to adopt the ordinance awarding the annual concrete pipe contract to General Concrete Products Company; Councilman Philips had seconded that motion. The vote on that motion follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Wilbanks, Fuller, and Cannon Nays: Councilman Simmons Mayor Hutto ORDINANCE NO. 3550 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF GENERAL CONCRETE PRODUCTS COMPANY FOR THE ANNUAL CONCRETE PIPE CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF FIFTY FOUR THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED EIGHTY ONE & N01100 ($54,581.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 30113 -11) For tabulation, see Attachment "K•" Consider Approving Baker Road Beautification Plan To beautify Baker Road, the plan is to plant approximately 250 trees -- pines, red and white crepe myrtles in the medians. No flower beds will be developed so maintenance will be minimum. Estimated cost of the project is $5,000. Beautify Baytown Association is committed to an $800 donation and the Clean City Commission has agreed to begin a drive to acquire donations from entities located along Baker Road. At the present time the Administration is seeking approval of the plan with a goal of receiving necessary funding from local organizations to fund the project. Councilman Simmons moved to approve the plan to beautify Baker Road; Councilman Fuller seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None Consider Appointments of Sesquicentennial Committee Councilman Philips moved that Mr. Sam Bramlett be appointed to Chair the Sesquicentennial Committee; Councilman Fuller seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Simmons, Fuller, and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None Abstained: Council members Johnson and Wilbanks 30113 -21 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 13, 1983 Consider Appointments to Electrical Board Council will make appointments to the Electrical Board at a later meeting. Consider Appointments to Community Development Advisory Committee Council will make appointments to the Community Development Advisory Committee at a later meeting. Recess Into Executive Session to Discuss Land Acquisition Mayor Hutto recessed the open meeting into executive session to discuss land acquisition. When the open meeting resumed, the following business was transacted: Consider Approval of Purchasing Property for Park Purposes Councilman Philips moved to authorize the Administration to proceed with the acquisition of the Reimer property, Parcel No. 7 on the map attached to the minutes as Attachment "L," which was previously authorized by Council. Councilman Simmons seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None Adj ourn There being no further business to be transacted, the meeting was adjourned. 2Z:: � C, . , e - Eileen P. Hall, City Clerk T1 TL E :—Conunun i ty Der ve l opment BID: #26 DATE: _ 12/21/82 yr I r yr v/" r r %-/ vvry B1D TABULATION Attachment "B" Fd shnnk JBA Const. Prosper Bros. Mark.Plummer ffEM _.. QTY DESCRIPTION "E'X -TEN01`1T-- PRICE Uriif _LMILE— UNIT PRICE.__ EXTENDED • UNIT EXTENDED PRICE UNIT PRICE UNI PAIGE Nb U-- __P- aLCE., Elbert Curtis 109 Graham St. 7,815.00 8,598.00 7,608.80 8,875.00 082 -04 -o6 .... .... .... .... ... ... .... .. .. .... .... Grace Lipscomb 1004 Johnson St. 81800.00 8,909.00 8,782.67 6,900.00 #82 -03 -09 Pickney Byrne 323 E. Gulf 8,800.00 8,562.00 6,967.72 9,000.00 #82 -04 -07 Myrtle Peterson 210 W. Francis St. 6,895.95 8,924.00 6,537.34 6,095.00 #82 -04 -08 GKV55 IU IAL LESS DISC. NET TOTAL IIFI IV[-RY ITL is ANNUAL GASOLINE AND DIESEL FUEL CONTRACT // 31D. 31 -2 )ATE January 3, 1983 2:00 P.M. CITY OF 13AYT'OWIV B1D TABULATION Attachment "A" T� Nf QTY DESCRIPTION Exxon ..UNIT EXTENDED TB a um od UNIT EXTENDED O'Rourke Dist. Inc, UNIT X NO 0 UNIT EXTE-+rtDE:J PRICE , pqlrr PRICE PRICF PP1rF c p r: 1 ANNUAL GASOLINE & DIESEL FUEL FOR + I PUBLIC WORKS AND POLICE DEPT. GALLON GALLON NO BID i j 1 A. 100,000 Regular. Leaded Gasoline 0.9130 91000.00 •0.937 I 93,700.00 I j B.; 50,000 j Regular Unleaded Gasoline 0.9530 47,650.00 0.969 I; 48,450.00 1 C.; 100,000 #' Premium Unleaded Gasoline 1.003 100,300.00 1.01.2 ! 101,200.00 D.• 50,000 No. 2. Diesel Fuel 0.9010• i 45,050.00 .992 49,600.00 TOTAL: $284,300.00 $292,050.00 2.1 ANNUAL GASOLINE & DIESEL FUEL FOR PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT. J 15,000 Regular Unleaded Gasoline 0.9130 l 13,695.00 .999 i , B.i 5,000 No. 2 Diesel Fuel 0.9010 4,505.00 1.022 .14,985.00 i 5,110.00 = • TOTALL I I � j $302,500.00 $313,045.00 GROSS TOTAL LESS DISC: NET '" TI L R 00 i.� xz w �v O w w _9 a a e! _E m 00 2 O •a+ nL 4: N N t o O CL is H E E C m cn 1, N �� YO Ecl: _E E� CL A p �( (A U_ EO i N C i� C n E .� N Cd u� � a Q ? L(i M LL to v). J . ...� .�. r...... ..�. ..� �� W — 2 a • o C9 Q N I_ d yr to Z d W W J Z 0 Z w Ljj L o� O� Wct N m CC t� _ �4 z co 11, Q a ° � a- p ° • w co z W (� W F_ cc O ' OL V W k m V Q twit 4 Z Z Q 1- O O " u a 1 N •- W v l lL� Z p N m p N �}. — of c h C • cc N V I ((//V H 0. N -! ca 00 w Q J Q . Z Z CO L Q 1 .O NE •^ -�- Q N u co 0) d ``J __.... �.�.�._ »._.....___.._ �- L1.) I-- m_ n F- Attachment "C" urY Or BAYTOW N ITL`: ANNUAL FLEXIBLE BASE MATERIAL BID TABULATION 310: #9212-23 U , )ATE DECEMBER 29, 1982 2:00 P.M. FE1+1 QTY DESCRIPTION DCLIFF MATERIALS .UNIT EXTENDED GULF CO LIMESTONE •- UNIT EXTENDED PARKER- BROTHERS CO, UNIT X ND D UNIT UN! T - I R I 9-EL PR#r.E P c PR LCE pJq IC r C jE px?tr;r -pa ?g-c' o. ANNUAL FLEXIBLE BASE MATERIAL 1 1. 7,000 ton Flexible Base Material F.0.6. !_ plantsite 9.85 68,950.00 9.40 65,800:00 9.00 63,000.00 IA. 7, 000 ton ALTERNATE: Flexible Base 1 Material F.O.B. 1601 West 1 Main St., Baytown, 12,95 90,650.00 12,40 ( 860800.00 11.93 i 83,510.00 DELIVERY: AS REQU .STED AS NEE ED 1 DAY A.R.O. i GROSS TOTAL LESS DISC NET Tip L n�1ttf fn' 0,•a CITY OF BAYTOWN rI TL E: ANNUAL BRASS FITTINGS CONTRACT PAGE 2 #8212-18 13ID T n p V' L H TI O V 3! D - ).ATE. -December 9, 1982 2:00 P.M. rEtis rNO (TTY DESCRIPTION .EXTENDED UNIT or ENDED UN/ X ND D UNIT EA'TEt1D:,J U.i %T Zx'c� *:.• r .i c i s p r: ^air c 1 a; j 1 ANNUAL BRASS FITTINGS CONTRACT CONT BID • I t I t � ' GROSS TOTAL LESS DISC~ NET TOTA L - -- -- - -- - - Attachment "E" CITY OF BAYTOW N -1 TL : ANNUAL PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES CONTRACT BID TABULATION 31D'"#8212-19 . 4 T E. -DECEMBER 14, 1982 2:00 P.M. ' FEM QTY DESCRIPTION SOUTH SIDE CAMERA .UNIr EXTENDED UNIT f EXTENDED UNIT E77ENDED UNIT EXTEU ED Ur:: T ANNUAL PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES I CONTRACT, per specifications. $12,719.00 j 1 I i DELIVERY: 30 DAYS ARO II I ' I 1 1 i GROSS TOTAL LESS DISC: NET TA L "G" cay Or BA YTO W ry Attachment -ANNUAL WATER METER CONTRACT PAGE ONE U ID TABULATION (D; #8212 -21 >ATE= 'DECEMBER 22, 1982 2:00 P.M. -EM QTY DESCRIPTION HERSEY PRODUCTS ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL UTILITY SUPPLY NEPTUNE WATER METER £x7E.�p J ERNIE BRADLEY _ Unr,r £XT£NDEp W�r1T EXTENDED UN! ENDED UNrT ur;;1' C. PpIrr ANNUAL WATER METER CONTRACT, per specificAtions. 1. 800 5/8 x 3/4" 32.81 1 26,248. 29,13 1 23,304. 28.20 22,560. 27.80 22,240. *25.50 120,400. 2. 50 j 1" 81.18 4,059. 66.0 3,300.. 72.00 3,600. 70.00 3,500. x49.50 :2,425. 3. 30 i l" 189.30 5,679. 200.00 6,000. 190.00 j 5,700. 151.00 4,530 145.00 4,350. 4. 5 2" 261.00 1 1,305. 295.00 1,475. 274.00 1 1,370. 205.00 1,025. 198.00 990• 5•� 2 2" Compound • 686.00 1,372. 640.00 1,280. 30.00 1,260. 980.00 i 1,960. NO BID 6. 1 3" Compound 1011.00 1,011. 905.00 905. 925.00 925.. 1425.00 1,425. NO BID 7. 1 4" Compound * 1503.00 1,503• [240.00 595.00 1,595. 1530.00 1,530• 11100.00 1,800. NO BID 8.1 45 2" Turbine 247.00 11,115• 10,800. 234.00 10,530. 26.00 10,170. NO BID 9.i 10 3" Turbine 389.00 3,890.- 385.00 3,850. 367.00 3,670. 334.00 3,340• NO BID 10• i 3 4" Turbine 577.00 1,731. 803.00 I 2,409. 701.00 2,103. 643.00 = 1,929• NO "BID 11.3 2 6" Turbine 1481.00 i 2,962. 1900.00 3,800. 1840.00 3,680. 1305.00 2,610. NO BID 12.! 2 Fire Hydrant Meter - 3" 496.00 992. 450.00 900.. 385.00 770. 350.00 700.', 390.00 780. 13. 1 Fire Service Meter - 6" 2494.00 2,494. 2390.00 2,390. 2385.00 2,385. 1960.00 .1,960. NO BID 14. 1 Fire Service Meter - 10" 5230.00 5,230. 4780.00 4,780. 4750.00 4,750. NO BID NO BID TOTAL: $64,833.00 $57,189.00 $28,995.01 $69,591.00 $66,788.00 . DELIVERY: 30 - 45 DAYS 30 -60 DA.S STOCK - 30 DAYS 35 DAYS 14 DAYS i GROSS TOTAL LESS DISC NET TOT.A L Act 10 *Meter does not meet specs. Has 2 registers instead of one. *5/8" s 1" meters do not meet specs. Meters have plasti external parts. TITLE: Rear Loading Solid Waste Collection Vehicles BID: - #8212 -26 . DATE: December 27, 1982 2:00 p.m. CITY OF BAYTOWN Attachment "F" BID TABULATION ITEM QTY DESCRIPTION D avis Ch KUNIT UNITTruEXTENDED EXTENDED UNIT EXTENDED -PRICF UNIT PRICF EXTENDED PRICE UNIT EXTENDS 2 REAR LOADING SOLID WASTE COLLECT70N _PRICF VEHICLES, per specifications. 46,485.0 92,970-00 47,726.00 95,452.00 47,449.0 94,899.80 MODEL: 1983 FO FD 1983 Chevrolet 1983 International :LN8000 C7DO42 S -1954 F- •.4000 e i 1 20 cubi c yard. DELIVERY: -15 DAYS ARO 150 DAYS ARO 60 -90 D YS ARO UrVU00 1 V IfiL LESS DISC. NET TOTA L DEL ;ERY I i17-L `_ ANNUAL CEMENT STABILIZED SAND-CONTRACT 91D.- 1/8212 -17 ID4 E. DECEMBER 8, 1982 2:00 P.M. TENfl QTY DESCRIPTION 1. 3000 TONS 11 SK-Ton Cement. 2. 1000 TONS 2 SK -ton Cement Stabilized Sand 3.i 500 TONS1 21 SK -Ton Cement Stabilized Sand TOTAL: PLANT LOCATION: DISTANCE FROM 1200 LEE DRIVE GROSS TOTAL LESS DISC NET TOTA L f1 �' s Tyr � K • CITY OF 13RYTOW N E31D TABULATION ANAHUAC TOWING KEOWN SUPPLY . ivi r P NITS I EXTENDED EXTENDED 16.15 $48,450.00 15.00 $45,000.00 18.05 $181050.00 16.75 $16,750.00 I 19.75 ! $ 9,875.00 i 18.75 $ 9,375.00 t $76, 375.00 *$71,125.00 HWY 146 1 CEDAR BAYOU BEAUMON , TEXAS 8 Miles - -*Departmept says dista ce too far o travel wit Sta b ill d Sand. Attachment "H" tXTEU.- -,0 UN!T FXTcr.:.. I I II 1 1 I t : i i ITL": ANNUAL WATER METER CONTRACT PAGE TWO 31D: 8212-21 SATE.- . DECEMBER 22' 1982 2 :00 P.M. CITY OF 13AYTOW IV BID TABULATION TE11�i QTY DESCRIPTION COMPANY PROHAN I EXTENDED P IVIT� EXTENDED uNIT x No D UNIT ExTp u �j UJU!T rX7 *v' . I ANNUAL WATER METER CONTRACT per specifications I 1. 800 5/8" x 3/4" *27.75 22,200.00 i 1 2. i 50 11" *71.50 I 3,575.00 1 3. 30 list *175.00 5,250.00 4. 5 2" `236.00 I a ,180.00 5 2 2" Compound 929.50 1,858.00 6. 1 3" Compound 1087.00 1,087.00 7. 1 4" Compound 1713.00 1,713.00 8. 45 2" Turbine 251.00 .11,295.00 9. I 10 3" Turbine. 476.00 4,760.00 10. ( 3 4" Turbine 894.00 2,682.00 Il. 2 6" Turbine 1550.00 i 3,100.00 i2. 2 Fire Hydrant Meter - 3" NO BID 3• 1 Fire Hydrant Meter - 6" NO BID I 4. 1 Fire Service Meter - 10" NO BID 1 TOTAL: $58,700.00 DELIVER 10 -15 DAYS 1 I , VrTVJJ I V IHL *5 /ts ", 1 ", lil , and 2" Meters LESS DISC~ do not meet specifications.. NET "' ?TA L Meters have external plastic parts. 9 _ CITY OF 13AYTOW N f ITLis I TON PICKUP TRUCKATILITY DEPT. E31D TABULATION 3ID= #831 -27 DATE: • JANUARY 5, 1983 PAGE TWO TEM QTY DESCRIPTION PBOBROBERTSON CHEV. XTENDEO UNIT EXTENDED UNIT UNIT EXTEr,ro:E� Ut +'T r. I 1. 1 TON PICKUP TRUCK FOR UTILITY 1 1 I DEPT., per specifications. 8,208.09 i i MODEL: CHEVROLEt S -10 I DELIVERY: 100 DAYSiARO " 1 i j 1 I GROSS TOTAL LESS DISC NET `I"OTA L A xr o 7ki c o o lf T ITON PICKUP TRUCK/UTILITY DEPT, #8 31-27 )ATE JANUARY 5, 1983 PAGE 1 of CITY OF SAY-TOWN BID TABULATION Attachment "I" TEM QTY DESCRIPTION BAYTOWN DATSUN KNAPP CHEVROLET SAN JACINTO FORD BAYSHORE DODGE BAYTOWN•]10TORS -UNIT EXTENDED UNIT EXTENDED UNI T END-ED UNIT EXTE.11DEa UU.-T EX:ci:. 1 P& CE , PRIer e pptrF, ^a•r'r a: #-% 1. 1 TON PICKUP TRUCK FOR UTILITY ( I DEPT., per specifications. - NO BID 8,322.00 8 103.37 8,554.20 1 8,261.9 ALTERNATES: IALTERNATE: ALTERNATE: I ALTERNATE: 8,335.19 8,333.30 8,196.00 i MODEL: i CHEVROLET FORD RANGER ;DODGE D -150 �GMC 515 -- _ ALT CSl 603 Alt. F-100 ALT. TO OTA DELIVERY: 30-DAYS IRO 90 DAYS ARO 60 DAYS ARO 60 DAYS kRO GROSS TOTAL LESS DISC NET , 'v TAL n r I_. ; p ' • 9 FI TL L: ANNUAL CONCRETE PIPE CONTRACT 31D: #8212 -22 )ATE= - DECEMBER 28, 1982 2:00 P.M. TEM! QTY 6,675.00 DESCRIPTION 19,114.00 5.76 i 10,368.00 ANNUAL CONCRETE PIPE CONTRACT, 89670.00 per specifications. j 1. 1,500 ft. 12" R.C.P. - T & G 2. 3,800 ft. j 15" R.C.P. - T 6 G 3. 1,800 ft. 18" R.C.P. - T 6 G 4. 1,000 ft, 24" R.C.P. - T E G 5. 500 ft. 30" R.C.P. - T E G 5. 10o ft. 36" R.C.P. - T & G 3 I 1 TOTAL: s i DELIVERY: GROSS TOTAL LESS DISC NET IOTA L CITY Or 13AYTOWN [31D TABULATION FF rvr 4.45 I 6,675.00 5.03 19,114.00 5.76 i 10,368.00 8.67 89670.00 12.40 6,200.00 17.88 1,788.00 , 1,846.00 $52,815.00 5 DAYS TARO UN 5.01 5.65 6.46 9.70 NO NO 7,515.00 21,470.00 11,628.00 9,700:00 BID BID i$50,313.00 ON REOLEST DOES TIME I]M ME SPEFICATIONSERI DTEM$OT �11) ON ALL ITE 4.58 5.24 5.99 8.99 12.84 18.49 I DAY 6,870.00 19,912.00 10,782.00 8,990.00 6,420.00 1,849.00 $54,823.00 Attachment "K" NO B I D r; ENERAL CONCRETE _S54t581_o0 } DAY H I 4.59 t 6,885.00 5.21 19,798.00 5.94 10,692.00 8.96- 8,960.00 12.80 1 6,400.00 18.46 , 1,846.00 _S54t581_o0 } DAY H TITLE. Annual calcium Hypochlorite BID: _ 831 -25 DATE: January 4, 1983 CITY OF BAYTO WN BID TABULATION Attachment "J" ITEM Q TY DESCRIPTION Van Waters &Rogers Thompson Hayward Chem McKesson Chemical Norain Supply Co. UNIT EXTENDED UNIT EXTENDED UNIT EXTENDED UNIT EXTENDED UNIT EXTEND[ 1. 100 1b. CALCIUM HYPOCHLORITE ' 99.29 12,411.25 108.00 13,500.00 130.08 16,260.00 135:00 16,875.00 \ DELIVERY: 1-2 DAYS ARO 2 -3- DAYS ARO 2 -3.DA S ARO 6 DAYS ARO r%n r% t-% -r ^-rn I V /%IJJJ 1 V IHL. LESS DISC.. NET TOTAL nFl -/FRY o d� Q IL Q J �— Q h a3 v y .W V a a r � a H 0 0 U•• N W H p� N co WH 00. z N O U N W Q, N M r•1 W z N U z GD W Q --w 0 LAj W �oeT J o..J cvn � � W�� V� .7 n r ;� t y WQ LAJ Z x k ' 2 ' O W • �- W tiL 0 w 0 w_ o W }_4 0 z L C ' c �• W o z Li LAJ a U 0. (f) W W W Q U Z O v Cy Lij J o..J cvn � � W�� r� _i (4-s 7- R t s._ Dom•. w Q oe c Gr9a 4 _r .O racy r. V l � W v i ,till¢ y'�1,,9,MYaMf.d ' 3. ,N a j.. r 1l1 � a rr ro n CD M r T N 6.P Ac. � 6.A Ae. zo V 19' S.O Ac. _S_ p o . w Q oe c Gr9a 4 _r .O racy r. V l � W v i ,till¢ y'�1,,9,MYaMf.d ' 3. ,N a j.. r 1l1 � a rr ro n CD M r 1p ' A D 1 'c2 6.P Ac. ZI 6.A Ae. zo S,nAC. 19' S.O Ac. o . n 1p ' A D 1