The URL can be used to link to this page

1982 03 25 CC Minutes20325 -1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN March 25, 1982 The City Council of the City of Baytown, met in regular session on Thursday, March 25, 1982, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber of Baytown City Hall with the following attendance: Fred T. Philips Jimmy Johnson Perry M. Simmons Mary E. Wilbanks Roy L. Fuller Allen Cannon Emmett 0. Hutto Fritz Lanham Larry Patterson Randy Strong Eileen P. Hall Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilman Mayor City Manager Assistant City Manager City Attorney City Clerk The meeting was called to order with a quorum present and the invocation was offered, afterwhich the following business was transacted: Minutes Councilman Johnson moved to approve the minutes for the special and regular Council meetings held on March 11, 1982; Councilman Simmons seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None Receive Petitions No petitions were presented. Representative Tony Polumbo Mayor Hutto recognized State Representative Tony Polumbo who stated that he was present to meet the members of Council and to let Council know that he is interested in the concerns of the citizens of Baytown and to learn ways that he might be of assistance in Austin. City Manager's Report Council was furnished with a copy of a letter from Entex, Inc. requesting an increase in rates of $ .95 per month. This is the annual cost of service increase which Council has considered each year for the past several years. 20325 -2 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 25, 1982 Every six months Entex requests an increase for fuel costs, but cost of service increases are requested on an annual basis. There is no necessity for a formal rate hearing unless Council elects to do so. In the past, Council has not held a formal rate hearing, but has considered an item on the agenda. The result of the request will be to increase the minimum charge for residential service to $6.62 which reflects the $ .95 increase or 2.6% increase. In response to an inquiry from Council, Randy Strong, City Attorney, explained that the theory that the request is based upon is revenue and expenditures over a test year. The only data available is prior year's data. Figures from that are utilized to determine what kind of increase is necessary. Council requested that a representative of Entex, Inc. be present to explain the request. The Administration will place an item in this regard on the agenda for Council consideration. Houston Lighting and Power - Council was also furnished with a copy of the monthly letter from Houston Lighting and Power in which a small increase in fuel cost was indicated. The bill for a customer using 1,000 KWH will increase in April to $72.73 over the March bill of $71.40. Councilman Johnson pointed out that the fuel cost will soon be the bulk of electrical service if things continue at the present rate. More and more citizens are complaining because gasoline costs are decreasing while fuel costs for utilities continue to increase. Council indicated to State Representative Polumbo that the Public Utility Commission should be taking a stronger position in the rate - making process. Representative Polumbo stated that he agreed and for this reason, in the last session of the legislature, he had introduced HB50 which would set up a consumer advocate, a legal counselor, who would represent rate payers before the PUC and Railroad Commission and that he would be re- introducing that bill in the next legislature. Senior Citizens Taxi Program - The annual report concerning the Senior Citizens Taxi Program was furnished to Council. The report summarizes 62 months of operation. This program continues to be very successful and continues at approximately the same level of operation as last year. Councilman Philips stated that the fact that the program is remaining at a constant level is an indication that the program is not being abused. Craigmont /Ponderosa Water Line Replacment - Wayne Smith, Consulting Engineer for the Criagmont /Ponderosa Water Line Replacement Project, has notified the Administration that the design phase of this project is approximately eighty (80 %) percent complete. Sliplining - Due to somewhat of an emergency situation in Glen Arbor in the vicinity of Inwood and Pamela where a sewer line had collapsed, a contract had been awarded to slipline approximately 1,300 feet of 16 inch line; 800 feet of that has been completed. im 20325 -3 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 25, 1982 Drainage - Massey Tompkins Road Project is about ninety - five (95w) percent complete; crews have been working in the vicinity of Cedar Bayou Baptist Church and that project is about twenty (20 %) percent complete. Work along Barnes Street has been completed; Colburn Street drainage work is about fifteen (1576) percent complete. It was necessary for the city to move to that area and perform the necessary drainage work along those two streets because those streets are scheduled to be rebuilt. Council was reminded of the memorandum which was provided in the packet listing various boards and commissions that would be due for appointment in April. F. P. Mask Will Appear Mr. F. P. Mask appeared before Council to request Council action regarding access to property owned by the Mask family on Boise Street. Mr. Mask presented Council with a copy of minutes from February 9, 1967, wherein a previous Council had authorized that any available scrap material from other streets be utilized to form Boise Street. Council requested that the Administration place an item on the next agenda in this regard and that Council be provided with maps indicating the location of the street, along with alternatives and costs. Richard Clark Will Appear Mr. Clark had informed the Admininistration prior to the meeting that he no longer desired to appear. Consider West Little League Proposal Bobby Rountree, Director of Parks and Recreation, stated that the parks' staff has been meeting with West Little League representatives for several weeks concerning location and facilities of the West Little League. Presently, West Little League is located off Greenbriar Street adjacent to Lakewood Swimming Pool. This area is very low and floods frequently. Every year the Little League expends a great amount of time, energy and money toward preparing the area for Little League season. Each year the city is also called upon to furnish manpower and equipment to prepare the park. The problem is that the area is very low and drains very poorly which necessitates this extra work each year. The parks' staff met with the West Little League representatives and proposed that the league be moved to Westwood Park on Schreck Street. The elevation of Schreck Street is 25 feet. The proposal which has been approved by the Little League follows: The West Little League will: 1. Clear land for two fields; 2. Electrical materials, lighting fixtures and poles installed (no above ground wiring); 20325 -4 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 25, 1982 3. Restroom construction under existing shelter; 4. Press box and concession stand construction. The city will: 1. Survey and perform drainage work; 2. Furnish the land (existing); 3. Furnish sewer and water (existing); 4. Electrical service (existing); 5. Request $20,000 in Revenue Sharing funds for fence and dugout construction. The park is 15 acres in size and the clearing will take approximately 3 -4 acres of the park for fields. The Central Little League Committee has granted the expenditure of $17,500 toward this project. The proposed project has been approved by Central Little League Committee, West Little League Board of Directors, as well as the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. The Administration recommended approval of the proposal and requested $20,000 in Revenue Sharing for the fencing and dugouts for the two fields. If Council approves the proposal, an item will be placed on a future agenda to appropriate revenue sharing funds. Councilman Cannon moved to accept the recommendation of the Administration; Councilman Johnson seconded the motion. In response to an inquiry from Council, representatives of West Little League were present and verified that the city would not be requested to perform any further work than was specified by Mr. Rountree. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None Consider Proposed Ordinance, First Reading on Proposed Annexation of Goose Creek Shopping Center Council held two public hearings on the proposed annexation as required by state statute on March 11, 1982. No individuals expressed opposition to the proposed annexation. The Administra- tion recommended approval of the ordinance. Councilwoman Wilbanks moved for adoption of the ordinance; Councilman Fuller seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 3354 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXTENSION OF CERTAIN BOUNDARY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS, AND THE ANNEXATION OF GOOSE CREEK SHOPPING CENTER AND ADJACENT LAND WHICH SAID TERRITORY LIES ADJACENT TO AND ADJOINS THE PRESENT BOUNDARY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS. 20325 -5 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 25, 1982 Consider Proposed Ordinance, Amending Wrecker Ordinance to Provide Maximum Fee for Dolly and Motorcycle Tows Bill Blake, Vice Chairman of the Auto Wrecker Committee, was present to discuss the proposed amendments to the wrecker ordinance. Mr. Blake explained that the committee had discussed the proposed changes at great length. The committee felt that an amendment was necessary in the charge regarding dolly tows in order to equalize charges. Considerably more work is required in the event of a dolly tow, yet the existing ordinance provides a maximum charge of $65 for a dolly haul. The committee felt that in the event of a dolly haul, the wrecker operator should be allowed to charge for additional labor and therefore, the committee recommended that the ordinance be revised to provide for a charge of $65.00 for a dolly tow which would allow for an additional charge of $20 for additional labor. The maximum charge for any and all tows from the scene of an accident would remain unchanged - -$85. In response to the inquiry whether the committee had considered assessing a flat charge for all services performed, Mr. Blake stated that he had made that motion, but that motion died for lack of second. The committee felt that charges should be delineated to provide an accurate charge for services performed. Denzil Shirley, wrecker owner /operator, was present and stated that under the present ordinance, the wrecker owner /operators are being penalized for performing dolly tows. The committee felt that the charge to haul a motorcycle should be increased to $65 due to the fact that in instances where the bike is not completely wrecked, it is necessary to suspend the vehicle in order to tow it. This requires special handling and a great amount of time on the part of the wrecker operators. Councilman Johnson moved for adoption of the ordinance; Councilman Philips seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 3355 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 6 ENTITLED "AUTO WRECKERS" OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN CODE OF ORDINANCES BY THE AMENDMENT OF ARTICLE II, SECTION 6 -16, "PERMISSIBLE FEES AND CHARGES FOR POLICE INITIATED TOWING SERVICES", SUBSECTION (d) & (e) AND BY THE ADDITION TO THAT SECTION OF A NEW SUBSECTION (g): PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE, CONTAINING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A MAXIMUM PENALTY OF $200.00; AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. 20325 -6 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 25, 1982 Consider Preliminary Engineering Report for Caldwell Street Improvements and Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications Jim Hutchison with the firm of Busch, Hutchison and Associates was present to review preliminary engineering report for Caldwell Street Improvements for Council. Mr. Hutchison pointed out that to provide proper drainage to Caldwell will be simply a matter of putting in the proper storm sewer for Caldwell and connecting that storm sewer to the Robin Road storm sewer. When Robin Road storm sewer was constructed, drainage for Caldwell Street was provided. Caldwell Street is a small street that runs behind the new Baytown Junior School site. There will be two outlets from the school onto Caldwell Street. The drainage that will be carried to Robin Road storm sewer is about ninety (9010) percent of what will be collected on Caldwell; ten (1070) percent will be taken to Post Oak Drive and go into that system. When the school was designed approximately ninety - nine (990) percent of the drainage for that site was designed to remain on site. In response to an inquiry from Council, Mr. Hutchison explained that the reason the drainage was not directed to Bayway Drive was that there is no drainage facility on Bayway Drive. To go that direction, the drainage would have to go in a roadside ditch and then go south a considerable distance to Honeysuckle to get back into a ditch again and then go west. Robin Road storm sewer was designed to take care of what will be diverted to that system. There are double 42 inch pipes coming to Caldwell and double 48 inch pipes from Caldwell going on south which pipes are all underground. This is one of the projects that was included in the 1981 Bond Program. No street bond funds have been sold, but remaining from the 1975 Bond Program is $560,000 which could be utilized. Those funds will be needed for this project and for purchase of right of way for Rollingbrook Drive Extension. Construction costs for this project are estimated to be $155,000, plus ten (10 %) percent in engineering costs for a total of $170,410. fir. Lanham mentioned that Council will need to determine whether this project is to be an assessment project and if Council desires for this to be an assessment project, an initiation ordinance must be adopted. In the initiation ordinance, the consulting engineers will be directed to prepare plans and specifications. Council requested that the Administration place an item on the agenda in this regard. In the meantime, Council will look at the proposed project to determine if it should be done on assessment basis. Consent Agenda Pete Cote, Purchasing Agent, explained that on Item d, the reason Treco, Inc. did not meet specifications is that the portable trash pump bid had a 2A inch capacity when specifications called for a pump with 3 inch capacity. Norman Dykes, Director of Public Works /City Engineer, verified that there are instances when the 3 inch capacity is required. N 20325 -7 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 25, 1982 Council then considered the Consent Agenda as follows: a. Proposed Ordinance No. 20325 -3, will award the annual oil and grease contract. Six bids were received. Baytown Oil Sales submitted the low bid of $18,510. Council may wish to include in their consideration the following issues: 1. Exxon Company, USA indicated in their cover letter that by granting a total contract and buying in quantities larger than 450 gallons price differentials will be applied. However, because of clerical error, these were not enclosed in the received bids. These differ- entials will alter the actual dollars paid to Exxon Co. USA. Baytown Oil Sales also indicates they could grant price differentials if they have been requested. They are not included in Baytown Oil Sales's present bid. 2. Exxon Company indicates they will credit the City of Baytown $5.25 per drum of each drum returned. We purchase approximately ninety - eight 55 gallon drums per year. If we return 95 percent of these it would result in a $488.25 credit to the City. This would reduce Exxon's bid from $19,157.84 to $18,669.59. We recommend the low bidder, Baytown Oil Sales, be awarded this contract. b. Proposed Ordinance No. 20325 -4, will award the contract for the 1981 Community Development Program - Street, Drainage, and Water Improvements for Cypress and Magnolia Streets. Six (6) bids were received. Angel Brothers Construction submitted the low bid of $478,079.51. The engineering cost estimate for the project was $490,000. The amount budgeted for this project is $450,000 for street and drainage improvements and $50,000 for sidewalks (total $500,000). We recommend the low bidder, Angel Brothers, be awarded this contract. C. Proposed Ordinance No. 20325 -5, will award the bid for the July 4th Fireworks Display. Four (4) bids were received. Atlas Enterprises submitted the low bid of $2,420 and an alternate bid of $2,500 (B). The first bid features insurance coverage in the amount of $300,000. Plan B features insurance coverage in the sum of one million dollars. We recommend the low bidder, Atlas Enterprises, Plan B, be awarded this bid. d. Proposed Ordinance No. 20325 -6, awards the bid for a 6" portable trash pump. Six (6) bids were received. S & N Sales & Service submitted the low bid that met specifications of $9,950. Council has budgeted $9,500 for this purchase. Treco Inc. bid $9,570 but did not meet the specifications. We recommend the low bidder, S & N Sales & Services be awarded this contract. 20325 -8 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 25, 1982 e. Proposed Ordinance No. 20325 -7, will award the bid for the annual corrugated galvanized metal pipe contract. Two (2) bids were received. Armco Inc. submitted the low bid of $107,525. We recommend the low bidder, Armco Inc. be awarded this contract. f. Proposed Ordinance No. 20325 -8, will authorize the final payment for the 80 -81 Community Development Project -- Carver Street to R. T. Bishop Construction Company. The street and drainage improvements to Carver Street have been inspected by the City's Engineering Department and all items have been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications. The original contract amount was $172,636.02. Two change orders were executed in the amount of $9,437.06 bringing the total adjusted contract to $182,073.08. The final amount of work performed to date is $169,703.67, representing an underrun of $12,369.41. The contractor, R. T. Bishop Construction Company, has been paid $141,670.95; thus the remaining $28,032.72 (final payment) is the balance due. We recommend the balance of $28,032.72 be paid to R. T. Bishop Construction Company. g. Proposed Ordinance No. 20325 -9, will award the contract for demolition of structures at 188 S. Bayshore Drive. Six (6) bids were received. Prosper Brothers Inc. submitted the low bid of $1500, but was unable to acquire insurance coverage. The second low bid was that of Ed Shook Building Contractor, Inc. of $2,900. We recommend Ed Shook Bldg. Contractor Inc. be awarded this contract. Councilman Philips moved for adoption of the Consent Agenda Item Nos. a through g; Councilwoman Wilbanks seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 3356 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF BAYTOWN OIL SALES FOR THE ANNUAL OIL AND GREASE CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF EIGHTEEN THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED TEN & N01100 ($18,510.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 20325 -3.) 20325 -9 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 25, 1982 ORDINANCE NO. 3357 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF ANGEL BROTHERS CONSTRUC- TION FOR THE 1981 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM, STREET & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO CYPRESS & MAGNOLIA STREETS; AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF FOUR HUNDRED SEVENTY EIGHT THOUSAND SEVENTY NINE & 51/100 ($478,079.51) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 20325 -4). ORDINANCE NO. 3358 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF ATLAS ENTERPRISES, FOR THE PURCHASE OF JULY 4TH FIREWORKS AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED & N01100 ($2,500.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 20325 -5). ORDINANCE NO. 3359 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF S & N SALES & SERVICE FOR THE PURCHASE OF SIX INCH (6 ") PORTABLE TRASH PUMP AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF NINE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED FIFTY & N01100 ($9,950.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 20325 -6). ORDINANCE NO. 3360 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF ARMCO CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS FOR THE ANNUAL CORRUGATED GALVANIZED METAL PIPE CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF ONE HUNDRED SEVEN THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED TWENTY FIVE & N01100 ($107,525.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 20325 -7). ORDINANCE NO. 3361 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND ACCEPTING THE WORK DONE ON THE 1980 -81 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM, STREET & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO CARVER STREET; JOB NO. 8104 -16; FINDING THAT THE WORK IS DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACT; ACCEPTING THE ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE; AUTHORIZING THE FINAL PAYMENT TO THE SAID R. T. BISHOP CONSTRUCTION COMPANY; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. (Proposed Ordinance No. 20325 -8). ORDINANCE NO. 3362 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF ED SHOOK FOR THE DEMOLITION OF THE STRUCTURE AT 188 S. BAYSHORE; AUTHORIZING THE E"ECUTION OF A CONTRACT FOR TWO THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED AND N01100 ($2,900.00) DOLLARS. (Proposed Ordinance No. 20325 -9). For tabulation, see Attachment "A" through "F. Consider Proposed Resolution, Allocating Community Development Block Grant Fiscal Year 1982 Funds to Categories for Expenditures Council was furnished with a copy of the recommendation from the Community Development Advisory Board regarding the expenditure of $583,000 funding for 1982 which follows: 20325 -10 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 25, 1982 1. Acquisition of park site - $250,000; 2. Housing rehabilitation - $100,000; 3. Streets and Drainage - $150,000; 4. Administration of program - $83,000. The $583,000 is approximately $80,000 less than what was received for 1981. In response to an inquiry from Council, Bill Cornelius, Director of Planning and Traffic, stated that the proposed park site could be located on the fringes of the target area. Councilman Fuller moved for adoption of the resolution; Councilman Simmons seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None RESOLUTION NO. 804 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR FUNDS AVAILABLE THROUGH THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1982. Consider Proposed Resolution, Endorsing Regional Mobility Plan for the Greater Houston Area Dina Stucker, Transportation Planner, reviewed the Regional Mobility Plan of the Greater Houston Area and summarized the recommendations that would impact on Baytown. The cities in Harris County have been asked by the Harris County Mayors and Councilmens Association to consider endorsing this plan. Councilman Philips who is the City of Baytown's representative on the Transportation Planning Committee of H -GAC stated that most of the monies would be spent within the Beltway 8 Loop area, but this is an attempt to get an organized approach to breaking traffic congestion in the area. Creation of Harris County Turnpike Authority was mentioned as a possibility. Something will need to be created that is larger than Houston so that it can reach out and coordinate efforts for the entire area. One of the possibilities is to increase the gasoline tax. The plan will require 16.2 billion in funds. Mr. Lanham pointed out that the projects that Baytown has been interested in having implemented for several years have been included in this plan. For instance, the bridge across the shop channel and improvements to roadways in and around Baytown are also included. Some of the statistics in the report indicate that the problems in East Harris County are not as great as in other parts of the county. The congestion index value compares various freeways in the Houston area with those in other cities. 20325 -11 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - March 25, 1982 Freeways with from 1.5% to 3% congestion are considered to be severely congested and those above 3% are considered critical. The Gulf Freeway has congestion index value of 5 %; Katy Freeway, 4.4 %; Southwest Freeway, 4 %; IH -45, 3.8%; W. Loop, 3.8 %; North Central in Dallas, 3.5% and IH -10 east, 1.9 %. Councilwoman Wilbanks moved for adoption of the resolu- tion; Councilman Fuller seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None RESOLUTION NO. 805 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN ENDORSING THE REGIONAL MOBILITY PLAN FOR THE GREATER HOUSTON AREA. Appointments to Baytown Housing Authority Board Mayor Hutto announced that in accordance with State law he would like to reappoint David C. Gunn and Norma Wilder to serve on the Baytown Housing Authority Board and to appoint Peter C. Alfaro. These appointments are for two -year terms. Council makes appointments to the Baytown Housing Finance Corporation Board and an item in that regard will be included on the next Council agenda. Weight Limit - Kilgore Road Mayor Hutto requested that the Administration study and recommend to Council a weight limit for Kilgore Road. Councilman Philips requested that the Administration include in that an enforcement plan. Commendation to Police Department Councilman Cannon mentioned reports from citizens commending the Baytown Police Department. He recognized the department for its good performance record. Councilman Philips requested that the Administration provide Council with a status report concerning the hiring of eleven (11) new officers. Adjourn There being no further business to be transacted, the meeting was adjourned. Ei een P. Ha 1, eity Clerk 'i TL �: ANNUAL 01 L s GREASE CONTRACT )ATE- 3 -3 -82; 9:30 a.m. BID TABULATION t BAYTOWN OIL SALES EXXON CO. U.S.A. HOMETOWN OIL MONARCH 'APER CO. CHICKERING OIL 'E,w` ►� OTY DESCRIPTION unr,r Fxr�No�'r? urvlr � ocrFNo�o uN�r N o uNrr , ExrFrl�tD ur;,r �x ;.�� ANNUAL OIL AND GREASE CONTRACT, (PER GAL. � APPROX. Per Specifications: 1 i 1. 402 gals. Motor Oil, 30 wt., 24/1 qt. cans $20.14 51349.38 $19.74 $1322.58 $4.00 $1608.00' NO ;BID $3.52 $1415.04 { 2. 1 825 gals. Imotor Oil, 30 wt., 55 gal. drums $162.45 $2436.75 $167.20 ? $2508.00 $3.50 ' $2887.50 $5.19 ? $4281.75 $3.14 ' $2590.50 3. 204 gals. :Motor Oil, 40 wt., 24/1 qt. cans $20.14 $684.76 $19.74 $671.16 $4.00 5816.20 NO BID 53.52 5718.08 4. 825 gals. Motor Oil, 40 wt., 55 gal. drums $165.20 $2478.00 $167.20 $2508.00 $3.50 1 $2887.50 $5.19 $4281.75 $3.14 $2590.50 { 5. ;r. i 660 gals. 'Solvent, 55 gal. drums $1.97 S1300.20 $2.08 i $1372.80 $3.00 S1980.00 $5.60 $3696.00 NO BID 6. i 25 lbs.- Multi- Purpose grease cart. per lb. $•95 $23.75 $.66 $16.50 $.75 $18.75 ,$1.24 $31.00 $.86 $21.50 7. 1600 lbs. Multi- Purpose gear oil, 400-lb. dru $189.60 $758.40 $191.00 $764.00 $.5575 $892.00 $.84 $1344.00 $.58 $928.00 I~ 8.4 105 lbs. Extreme Pressure Lith. grease,] /35 ] lb. tub $24.72 $74.16 $21.70 $65.10 $1.21 $127.05 $.98 $102.90 $.77 $80.85 9 I 330 gals. Multi- Viscosity Motor Oil, 1OW40, S22.00 1 $1210.00 $26.70 S1468.50 $4.30 $1419.00 NO BID $4.17 $1376.10 24/1 qt. cans per case 10. ( 275 gals. ;A.T Fluid, Dextron II, 55 gal drums $169.80 $849.00 $188.10 S940.50 $3.29 $904.75 $5.90 $1622.50 $3.37 $926.75 11. 275 gals. !A.T. Fluid, Ford Type, 55 gal drums $158.60 i $793.00 $188.10 ! $940.50 $3.29 $904.75 $5.75 $1581.25 $3.37 $926.75 12. 660 gals. Tractor Fluid, 55 gal drums $173.30 I $2079.60 $190.85 $2290.20 $3.50 $2310.00 $5.95 1 $3927.00 $2.99 $1973.1, 13. 1650 gals. H.D. Hydraulic Fluid, 55 gal. drums $149.10 $4473.00 $140.25 $4207.50 $2.75 $4537.50 $4.43 $7309.50 $2.65 I $4372.5u TOTAL BID: 118,510-00 *$19,075.34 $21,292.80 27,177.65 $17,919.97 DELIVERY: 1 DAY 3 DAYS 3 DAYS 4 3 DAYS 5 DAYS 55 gals. CHARGE NO.CHARGE NO CHARGE NO CHARGE { NO CHARGE $10.00 55 gals. CREDIT NO CHARGE *$5.25 /drum NO CHARGE NO CHARGE $10.00 MAILED BID ACKETS TO 7. GROSS TOTAL * *If drum is acceptable, ** *Plus Low Bid Solvents LESS DISC. assuming 955, return of drums. $19,219.97 r- Ml m �o (I) ) y J !d r vJ O r v m LO 00 V Q, ~t y r ril w D OO z `I N C 00 D to N %n r to to to to 03 to to in C C 0 N W W W N 1p w � N W �z 0 c� Q a rn m N m W l0 W n rn 0 b cl � � v� VI un rn VI k — to Lo O n O N W- w z o LA Ln rn m o z N DO N to to </> D c r W N 4.0 v m c-► to in to to to to to to to to in C C N W W W N 1p N W N W �z m l0 W l0 W un — r N to to </> AA, W N 4.0 4f� �( O -Ln — 0% to — N An N N V1 l0 l-0 L to 4- CPI W O O m vn --4 —— V - w v-r- i w m D 14 O FO O O N C p� O OO �o oO o0 Zp O O -< V O O V7 - In 0, N N O O N U1 w to a% f-1 N O O %n ,n O w O Vl O D` r1 z a� -) < it t. r• rn � rt 7 4 r.. CD �c o� 1981 Community Development Program- � j � Y �/ i- Uhl i � C� il�l� F TITLE: Street 6 Drainage Improvements to Cypress &Magnolia BID TA BU L A TI 4 �l BID: March 22, 1982 10:00 a.m. DATE C7IYVJJ I V JHL LESS DISC. N�T IOTA L n t�i�RY -� � An el Brothers Wight Construction Baytex Construction SKRLA Inc. TEM QTY DESCRIPTION urulT EXTENDED UNIT EXTENDED UNlT NO UNlT EXTEND 0 UNIT EX Nf� D ' 478,079.51 490,133.00 496,419.80 559,'124.15 Marathon Constr. Brown &Root N .� 617,672.00 662,980.50 � � +� .�.., ; � d �n��n T/1TA � C7IYVJJ I V JHL LESS DISC. N�T IOTA L n t�i�RY -� ice. 711 �o ;..!) p o Uo r - Attachment If%•=II -- - ---_- rJ 3 •- C W W `G N r rn o V1 O m , O cp W L C O v O { (n O O �O C) D r••1 co -n m N 0 7d m `�- c-in O 0 0 O N m o m o c r_ •-a =n C m r •• r D O 0 X C > Lr- D �oC m z� O -• o. 1 o n 1n Iz Z C N N d/! N K -1 rn O a o o - z v •r- �n r o v '"W :0 O w o o o a " N Cr n `O U U c: D o r•� CD r, c . sn •cn r r C N N m O .� z m O CD O O rno M c O N •f W co -1 N r; w � I Q� N I� co w O ar 3 4- i 0 L C r -c m gi O 2z rn Q to -v r d art O ,� C W W `G N V= V1 O O W L O O + O O O O �O co N 0 o •f W co -1 N r; w � I Q� N I� co w O ar 3 4- i 0 L C r -c m gi O 2z rn Q to -v r d art O ,� M C N N K L M 0 o n 0 0 cn rnv m O 0 X C > Lr- o -n m O -• o. 1 o n 1n Iz O a n 7 C 0 1n -1 Co O w Cr n U U •_ �� o r•� CD r, •f W co -1 N r; w � I Q� N I� co w O ar 3 4- i 0 L C r -c m gi O 2z rn Q to -v r d art O ,� a o c� •ti_ to p �D r Attachment "D" f [Tl C- —i r rt i IC, T, z O h C ;1 b � � fl r • m a !v �d 0 "$ -1 D � r� O o� r N A' �I %.D 7 c^ o r � . m x N Co rri ! " c� � m A r -- v M n � M (.n O D O r Co `,- C Cl D $ m • M rn M M° 3 v Z c N D O o � o d � o -- - -- m Q r 3 �� o M rn - M � I r D rn m D n n v r o w o G� in 3 .0 z O h C ;1 b � � fl r • m a !v �d 0 "$ -1 D � r� O o� r N A' �I %.D 7 c^ rn x N v, � ! " c� � m A o -- v M (.n O O O C Co 0 Cl M rn M° 3 v Z N D O o � o -- - -- Q m 3 �� M rn - -- � D rn m o n n v r o w o G� in 3 ° 2 Q� 1 O 'O -v O 3 to �_ �./► rr >C O C) n o rr r � � 1 o• O 3 sn ` rte- _ _4- -in O 1 1 f� C � .11 � y 00 E M o o N . !,. °o 00 z O h C ;1 b � � fl r • m a !v �d 0 "$ -1 D � r� O o� Tj rri U; r- m > O M rn 03 > m W bc no rn ('j'L �: ANNUAL CORRUGATED GALVANIZED METAL PIPE ID: #823 -64 ATE: -march 19, 1982 9:30 A.M. u ! . f \.1 ! ` r % r BID TABULATION r,.r. TEXAS CORRUGATORS ARMCO CONST. PROD. TEXAS PIPE � SUPPLY -EM 'DESCRIPTION unr ;r Fxr €Novo urv, � ExrFrvo�o uN��r x No o uNr xTc��o�o �A'r�� j ' a�r`r ^_ n ANNUAL SUPPLY OF CORRUGATED GALVANIZED METAL PIPE ' I x 1. 500 ft. 36" .Full Circle Diameter $2340 x$11,500.00 S19.90 S9. 950.00 NO BID 2. 500 ft. '42" Full Circle Diameter $26.90 $13,450.00 $22:95 $11,475.00 3, 500 ft. �48" Full Circle.Diameter $29.58 ;$14,790:00 $26.65 13,325.00 x 4. w� 500 ft. 54" Full Circle Diameter $34.00. $17,000.00 $30.70 15,350.00. �I ' 5. 500 ft. 60" Full Circle Diameter $37.50• $18,750.00 $33.85 16,925.00 E 6. v 500 ft. 66" Full Circle Diameter. $41.00 .$20,500.00 $38.80 19,400.00 Cd r 7. �j 500 ft. 72" Full Circle Diameter $45.40 $22,700.00 $42.20 21,100.00 I TOTAL: ,$118,690.00 107,525.00 ' DELIVERY: 5 DAYS 10 DAYS ' • I; x f ' BID PACKETS MAILED TO THREE I GROSS TOTAL LESS DISC p,!r• -r 'rnTA t ..- .;. L. ��'� .. nt:asc�t,rTt;o� car srt :urrurr C7 ! D; 2 s2 -24 �� T,�� rcbru,lry 23, 1982 8311 %4 B UL.4 iB ®N �� Q f frank Lockhart Ed Shook Blds. Contractor I c. Luckett Contractin Prey er Ar S CO�;PLETION COMPLETION COMPLETION COMPLETION COMPLETI01' C0:�;1'LETIO\ _ / �, TIAfE PRICE TIME PRICE TIME PRICE TIME PRICE TIME PRICE TIME YRIC 3 1110 Harbor - ' front &back 30 days $12 500. 30 days NO BID 0 days $20 000. 30 days 8,850. 30 days $5,000. 0 days $4,80 1 - W 3203 riinnesota 45 days 4,800: 45 days $3,475. S days 30,000. 45 days 2,880. 5 days 3,000. 5 days 4,20 1 � � 512 �ort;i Jones 30 days 8,500. X30 days 3,475. 0 days 10,000. 30 days 3,600. 30 days 4,400. 0 da s Y 2 60i 1 E i 188 S. Bayshore 30 days 3,000. 30 days 2,900. 4:.,._ _ 0 days NO BID 30 days 3,600. 30 days '1; 506.._ 0 days , .� _..... 4 , 801 1 � � 174 S. Bayshore � 30 days 2 800, 30 days 1,095: 0 days 0 BID 30 days 3,600. 30 days 1,500. 0 days 3 35( �� C I % ! I l I 1 J i