Loading...
1981 05 14 CC Minutes10514 -1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN May 14, 1981 The City Council of the City of Baytown, Texas, met in regular session on Thursday, May 14, 1981, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the Baytown City Hall with the fol- lowing attendance: Fred T. Philips Jimmy Johnson Perry M. Simmons Mary E. Wilbanks Roy L. Fuller Allen Cannon Emmett 0. Hutto Fritz Lanham Dan Savage Randy Strong Eileen P. Hall Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilman Mayor City Manager Assistant City Manager City Attorney City Clerk The meeting was called to order with a quorum present and the invocation was offered by former Councilwoman Eileen Caffey. Resolution No. 770 - Plaque presented to Eileen Caffey Councilwoman Wilbanks read Resolution No. 770, recog- nizing and thanking Eileen Caffey for her service to the community as Council person from District No. Two, afterwhich, she moved that Resolution No. 770 be adopted. Several Council members seconded the motion and the vote was unanimous to adopt Resolution No. 770. Mayor Hutto stepped to the podium to present Airs. Caffey with a signed copy of Resolution No. 770 and a plaque for her outstanding service as Councilwoman from April, 1978 to April, 1981. Minutes Councilman Philips moved for approval of the minutes for the meetings held April 23 and April 30, 1981. Council- woman Wilbanks seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None Pptitinnc None. City Manager's Report Energy Conservation Month - Council had been furnished with a copy of the press release regarding the declaration by Mayor Hutto of June as "Energy Conservation Month." The City of Baytown and the local utilities are encouraging energy conversation by various presentations throughout June. 10514 -2 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - May 14, 1981 Clean City Commission - The Clean City Commission has reported that the total photo- metric index study of litter accumulation indicates a reduction in litter of 62% with the average reduction in litter for cities participating being 46.27%. Baytown is doing a good job reducing its litter problems as a result of the work performed by the Clean City Commission. Baytown Area Water Authority - Approximately 75% of the water now being consumed in Baytown is coming from the BAWA water treatment plant. Two wells are being operated most of the time and at times three. For the most part, the wells being utilized are on the east side of town and are being utilized to maintain pressure. Sale of city -owned property on North Main - Reverend Roger Marcus with Peace Tabernacle Church has indicated an interest in purchasing the city owned -land adjacent to the church at 1102 North Main. For several years, the city has been leasing a portion of this land to the church and the city is no longer using the well or the ground storage tank located on this parcel. The Administration would like to invite bids to sell this property as it presently exists. Council had no objections. Replacement of police car - The Administration also requested to take bids for the replacement of a police car that was totaled in an accident last week. All of the cars that were authorized in the budget have been purchased. Council had no objections to advertisement for bids. Park Street Water Tower - The Park Street water tower has been sandblasted and painted and the tank is now in service. The outside of the tank will be painted during the summer. Sliplining - The line has been pulled from West Texas to Southwood between Westwood and Woodside and all the connections have been made. All the service connections and sliplining has been completed on that sewer line between Utah and Maryland, as well as the one adjacent to Edgewood Drive. Most of the work on the sliplining contract has been completed with the exception of cleanup. Drainage - City crews are working on Massey- Tompkins Road project which is about 60% complete. Rosilee is 50070 complete and the Beaumont /Donovan Street projct is 50% complete. A ditch that is being reworked in the vicinity of Craigmont Subdivision is 90% complete. The pipe is being installed under Cedar Bayou Road at Elvinta and that project is 80% complete. Harris County Flood Control District is installing a pipe in the county ditch near Lee College. The MacArthur Street drainage project is about 907o complete. Community Development - The contractor is making excellent progress on the community development work. Both lanes of Cherry Street have been paved and 27 of the driveways have been poured. The west side of Pine Street has been poured from Market to Oakwood. 1981 Street Improvement Program - Under the 1981 Street Improvement Program, the following streets have been overlaid: Dent, Northridge, Bellview, West Francis, West Homan, Dailey, Duke, Highway Blvd., Wright Street and Roseland Park (a change order was authorized for the Roseland Park work). 10514 -3 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - May 14, 1981 Questions and Comments Regarding City Manager's Report In response to a question from Council regarding flooding during recent heavy rains, tides got up to 3.6/3.8 feet. Rainfall was in the vicinity of 2 inches and there were no reports of house flooding. Councilman Johnson reported that he had witnessed water ponding at Richardson and Ward and on the west end of Mock- ingbird. He reported that the east end of Ward was relatively free of ponding and so was Highway 146. Mr. Lanham stated that the Administration had reported the ponding problem at Ward and Richardson. It appeared that a storm sewer was plugged. The officer who was injured in the accident had surgery performed on his face Monday. The physicians felt that the officer's eye had been saved through the surgery and at this time, the physicians feel that more surgery will be necessary. Consider Proposed Ordinance, Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract with Underwood, Neuhaus & Company for Fiscal Agent Services The proposed contract will provide fiscal agent services for the upcoming bond election and subsequent sales. The City of Baytown has had a contract with Underwood, Neuhaus since 1965. Underwood, Neuhaus' performance has been excel- lent. The fee schedule which is included in the contract is the standard fee schedule charged by Underwood, Neuhaus. The Administration recommended approval of the contract. Councilwoman Wilbanks moved for adoption of the ordi- nance, Councilman Cannon seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 3141 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN TO EXECUTE AND ATTEST TO A FINANCIAL ADVISORY CONTRACT WITH UNDERWOOD, NEUHAUS & COMPANY, INCORPORATED, AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Reverend Mack Cook will appear "" Reverend Mack Cook, Associate Pastor of First Baptist Church in Baytown, appeared before Council as a concerned citizen and as Police Chaplain to discuss the shortage of personnel in the police department. Reverend Cook exhibited a schematic of Baytown which indicated the six police districts. Presently, there are a maximum of eight officers patrolling the entire city which means there is one officer in each district with two rovers. Many times eight officers are not available, therefore, there may not be one officer per district. With the resignation of Patrolman Terry Ausley, Baytown now has 40 patrolmen. Mr. Ausley cited salary as his reason for resignation. Soon five rookies will be 10514 -4 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - May 14, 1981 patrolling. The FBI recommends that cities provide 2j patrolmen for every 1,000 people. At this time, Baytown has 1.5 patrolmen for every 1,000 people - -the national average is 2. Later in the meeting, Council will be considering authorization of an engineering study for proposal on police department radios. The department is in dire need of radio equipment. Reverend Cook encouraged Council to increase the fines for violators. He mentioned that the fine for public intoxi- cation is $28.50 which is really a minimal fine. He mentioned that he had been police chaplain for the past 18 months and in that capacity he had witnessed the stress placed on the policemen because of insufficient numbers and poor radio equipment. He invited Council to make an attempt to ride with the officers to witness first hand the problems of the police department. Consider Proposed Ordinance, Calling a Bond Election for June 9, 1981 Certificate of Ordinance and Ordinance No. 3142 follows: See page 10514 -17. 9 10514 -5 CERTIFICATE FOR ORDINANCE THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTIES OF HARRIS AND CHAMBERS CITY OF BAYTOWN We, the undersigned officers of the CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS (the "City "), hereby certify as follows: 1. The City Council of the City convened in regular meeting on the 14th day of May, 1981, at the regular meeting place thereof, within the City, and the roll was called of the duly constituted officers and members of the City Council and the City Clerk, to -wit: Emmett 0. Hutto Perry M. Simmons Jimmy Johnson Roy Fuller Allen Cannon Fred T. Philips Mary E. Wilbanks Eileen P. Hall Mayor Council Member Council Member Council Member Council Member Council Member Council Member City Clerk and all of said persons were present, except the following absentees: None thus constituting a quorum. Whereupon, among other business, the following was transacted at said meeting: a written ORDINANCE CALLING BOND ELECTION AND PROVIDING FOR ISSUANCE OF BONDS (the "Ordinance ") was duly introduced of the City Council and read in full. moved and seconded that the Ordinance due discussion, said motion, carrying of the Ordinance, prevailed and carri vote: for the consideration It was then duly be adopted; and, after with it the adoption sd by the following AYES: All members of the City Council shown present voted "Aye ". NAYS: None. 2. That a true, full and correct copy of the Ordinance adopted at the meeting described in the above and foregoing paragraph is attached to and follows this certificate; that the Ordinance has been duly recorded in the City Council's minutes of said meeting, that the above and foregoing paragraph is a true, full and correct excerpt from the City Council's minutes of said meeting pertaining to the adoption of the Ordinance; that the persons named in the above and foregoing paragraph are the duly chosen, qualified and acting officers and members of the City Council as indicated therein; that each of the officers and members of the City Council was duly and sufficiently notified officially and personally, in advance, of the date, hour, place and subject of the aforesaid meeting, and that the Ordinance would be introduced and considered for adoption at said meeting, and each of said officers and members consented, in advance, to the holding of such meeting for such purpose; that said meeting was open to the public as required by law; and tha-. ;:�hlic notice of the da_tQ_,- -scour, place and subject of said meei.is.- was given as req=uiYiad' by Vernon's Article 6252-17. as amenaie,� . CNEl? AND SEALED this 14th day of _ r C4.-ty--Clerk- (SEAL) � � � j } � l • ,. � _ ' �� �; J / � - j�... � - � _. .. 10514 -6 ORDINANCE NO. 3142 ORDINANCE CALLING BOND ELECTION AND PROVIDING FOR ISSUANCE OF BONDS THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTIES OF HARRIS AND CHAMBERS § CITY OF BAYTOWN § WHEREAS, the City Council (the "City Council ") deems it necessary to call the election hereinafter described and, sub- ject to the results of the election, to authorize the issuance of bonds; THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN THAT: Section 1. An election shall be held in the CITY OF BAYTOWN (the "City ") on June 9, 1981, in which all resident, qualified electors of the City shall be entitled to vote; the polls shall be open for voting from 7 :00 a.m, to 7 :00 p.m. at the following polling places in each of the following precincts heretofore established and described by natural or artificial boundaries or survey lines by an ordinance adopted by the City Council and on file in its minutes; and the following are hereby appointed officers to conduct the election at each polling place, respectively: ELECTION PRECINCT 1: Boundaries same as County Election Precinct 12. Polling Place: ALAMO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Election Officers: Ken Donovan Presiding Judge Monte G'Sell Alternate Presiding Judge Maximum number of clerks: 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- ELECTION PRECINCT 2: Boundaries same as County Election Precinct 13. Polling Place: THE BOY SCOUT HOUSE 6106 Bayway Drive (behind Wooster Fire Station) 10514 -7 Election Officers: R. L. Rieck Presiding Judge Blanche Rieck Alternate Presiding Judge Maximum number of clerks: 2 ------------------------------------------------------------- ELECTION PRECINCT 3: Composed of all of the territory con- tained in County Election Precincts 28 and 96, respectively, and which lies within the City. Polling Place: PUMPHREY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Election Officers: J. F. McChesney, Jr. Presiding Judge John L. Priddy Alternate Presiding Judge Maximum number of clerks: 4 -------------------------------------------------------------- ELECTION PRECINCT 4: Boundaries same as County Election Precinct 99. Polling Place: LAMAR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Election Officers: Gerald E. Dickens Presiding Judge Jack G. Hester Alternate Presiding Judge Maximum number of clerks: 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- ELECTION PRECINCT 5: Boundaries same as County Election Precinct 100. Polling Place: ASHBEL SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Election Officers: W. 0. Tidmon Presiding Judge Grace Tidmon Alternate Presiding Judge Maximum number of clerks: 4 ----------------------------------------------------------- ELECTION PRECINCT 6: Boundaries same as County Election Precinct 101. Polling Place: HORACE MANN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Election Officers: Lou Venia Robberson Presiding Judge S. V. Robberson Alternate Presiding Judge Maximum number of clerks: 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- ELECTION PRECINCT 7: Boundaries same as County Election Precinct 102. Polling Place: BAYTOWN EMPLOYEES FEDERATION BUILDING 3607 Market Street -2- 10514 -8 Election Officers: Andres A. Contreras Presiding Judge Marie Garner Alternate Presiding Judge Maximum number of clerks: 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- ELECTION PRECINCT 8: Boundaries same as County Election Precinct 149. Polling Place: SAN JACINTO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Election Officers: Clara Marti Presiding Judge Elodia Alaniz Alternate Presiding Judge Maximum number of clerks: 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- ELECTION PRECINCT 9: Boundaries same as County Election Precinct 165. Polling Place: WILLIAM B. TRAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Election Officers: Troy E. Peterson Presiding Judge Mary Hiebert Alternate Presiding Judge Maximum number of clerks: 4 -------------------------------------------------------------- ELECTION PRECINCT 10: Boundaries same as County Election Precinct 248. Polling Place: CARVER -JONES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Election Officers: Artiss Lewis Presiding Judge Johanna Wilson Alternate Presiding Judge Maximum number of clerks: 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- ELECTION PRECINCT 11: Boundaries same as County Election Precinct 249. Polling Place: JAMES BOWIE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Election Officers: Wilyne F. Laughlin Presiding Judge Ronald D. McLeod Alternate Presiding Judge Maximum number of clerks: 4 -------------------------------------------------------------- ELECTION PRECINCT 12: Boundaries same as County Election Precinct 386. Polling Place: STEPHEN F. AUSTIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL -3- 10514 -9 Election Officers: Dickson E. Hamiter Presiding Judge Mrs. Henry M. Hunt Alternate Presiding Judge Maximum number of clerks: 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- ELECTION PRECINCT 13: Boundaries same as County Election Precinct 414. Polling Place: CEDAR BAYOU JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Election Officers: Charles M. Albright Presiding Judge Mrs. Charles M. Albright Alternate Presiding Judge Maximum number of clerks: 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- ELECTION PRECINCT 14: Boundaries same as County Election Precinct 456. Polling Place: HARRIS COUNTY COURTHOUSE ANNEX Election Officers: Jana Rothwell Presiding Judge Lupe Mata Alternate Presiding Judge Maximum number of clerks: 2 Allen Cannon is hereby designated as the member of the City Council to canvass the voting machine used in absentee voting, together with the Mayor and City Clerk as provided for in Article 7.14, Section 7, of the Election Code, V.A.T.C.S., as amended. Each presiding judge shall appoint not less than two or more than the maximum number of election clerks specified above to serve at the polling place under his jurisdiction. Eileen P. Hall is hereby appointed as the clerk for absentee voting, and the: Office of the City Clerk City Hall Baytown, Texas 77520 is hereby designated as the place for absentee voting for said election. Said clerk shall keep said office open for at least eight (8) hours, that is, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., on each day for absentee voting which is not a Saturday, a Sunday, or -4- 10514 -10 an official State holiday; provided, however, except as autho- rized by Article 5.05, Subdivisions 3d and 3e, Texas Election Code, said clerk shall not permit anyone to vote absentee by personal appearance on any day which is not a regular working day for the clerk's office, and under no circumstances shall she permit anyone to vote absentee by personal appearance at any time when such office is not open to the public. By approving and signing this ordinance the Mayor of the City officially confirms his appointment of the aforesaid elec- tion officers to serve at the election; and by adopting this ordinance the City Council approves and concurs in the appoint- ment of the aforesaid election officers. Section 2. At said election the following PROPOSITIONS shall be submitted in accordance with law: PROPOSITION 1 SHALL THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS (THE "CITY "), BE AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE THE BONDS OF THE CITY, IN ONE OR MORE SERIES OR ISSUES, IN THE AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $3,540,000 WITH THE BONDS OF EACH SERIES OR ISSUE, RESPEC- TIVELY, TO MATURE SERIALLY OR OTHERWISE WITHIN NOT TO EXCEED 40 YEARS FROM THEIR DATE, AT ANY PRICE OR PRICES AND BEARING INTEREST AT ANY RATE OR RATES NOT TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM IN- TEREST RATE NOW OR HEREAFTER AUTHORIZED BY LAW, AS SHALL BE DETERMINED WITHIN THE DISCRETION OF THE CITY COUNCIL, PROVIDED THAT SUCH INTEREST RATE OR RATES ON ANY SERIES OR ISSUE OF SAID BONDS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM LEGAL LIMIT IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF ISSUANCE OF EACH SUCH SERIES OR ISSUE, FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING IMPROVEMENTS TO THE CITY'S WATERWORKS SYSTEM, AND TO LEVY AN ANNUAL TAX ON ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY SUFFICIENT TO PAY THE INTEREST ON SAID BONDS AS IT ACCRUES AND TO CREATE AND PROVIDE A SINKING FUND TO PAY THE PRINCIPAL OF SAID BONDS AS IT MATURES? PROPOSITION 2 SHALL THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS (THE "CITY "), BE AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE THE BONDS OF THE CITY, IN ONE OR MORE SERIES OR ISSUES, IN THE AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $6,340,000 WITH THE BONDS OF EACH SERIES OR ISSUE, RESPEC- TIVELY, TO MATURE SERIALLY OR OTHERWISE WITHIN NOT TO EXCEED 40 YEARS FROM THEIR DATE, AT ANY PRICE OR PRICES AND BEARING INTEREST AT ANY RATE OR RATES NOT TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM IN- TEREST RATE NOW OR HEREAFTER AUTHORIZED BY LAW, AS SHALL BE DETERMINED WITHIN THE DISCRETION OF THE CITY COUNCIL, PROVIDED THAT SUCH INTEREST RATE OR RATES ON ANY SERIES OR ISSUE OF SAID BONDS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM LEGAL LIMIT IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF ISSUANCE OF EACH SUCH SERIES OR ISSUE, FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING IMPROVEMENTS TO THE CITY'S SANITARY -5- 10514 -11 SEWER SYSTEM, AND TO LEVY AN ANNUAL TAX ON ALL TAXABLE PROP- ERTY WITHIN THE CITY SUFFICIENT TO PAY THE INTEREST ON SAID BONDS AS IT ACCRUES AND TO CREATE AND PROVIDE A SINKING FUND TO PAY THE PRINCIPAL OF SAID BONDS AS IT MATURES? PROPOSITION 3 SHALL THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS (THE "CITY "), BE AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE THE BONDS OF THE CITY, IN ONE OR MORE SERIES OR ISSUES, IN THE AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $4,000,000 WITH THE BONDS OF EACH SERIES OR ISSUE, RESPEC- TIVELY, TO MATURE SERIALLY OR OTHERWISE WITHIN NOT TO EXCEED 40 YEARS FROM THEIR DATE, AT ANY PRICE OR PRICES AND BEARING INTEREST AT ANY RATE OR RATES NOT TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM IN- TEREST RATE NOW OR HEREAFTER AUTHORIZED BY LAW, AS SHALL BE DETERMINED WITHIN THE DISCRETION OF THE CITY COUNCIL, PROVIDED THAT SUCH INTEREST RATE OR RATES ON ANY SERIES OR ISSUE OF SAID BONDS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM LEGAL LIMIT IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF ISSUANCE OF EACH SUCH SERIES OR ISSUE, FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING PERMANENT DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE CITY, AND TO LEVY AN ANNUAL TAX ON ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY SUFFICIENT TO PAY THE INTEREST ON SAID BONDS AS IT ACCRUES AND TO CREATE AND PROVIDE A SINKING FUND TO PAY THE PRINCIPAL OF SAID BONDS AS IT MATURES? PROPOSITION 4 SHALL THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS (THE "CITY "), BE AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE THE BONDS OF THE CITY, IN ONE OR MORE SERIES OR ISSUES, IN THE AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $4,940,000 WITH THE BONDS OF EACH SERIES OR ISSUE, RESPEC- TIVELY, TO MATURE SERIALLY OR OTHERWISE WITHIN NOT TO EXCEED 40 YEARS FROM THEIR DATE, AT ANY PRICE OR PRICES AND BEARING INTEREST AT ANY RATE OR RATES NOT TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM IN- TEREST RATE NOW OR HEREAFTER AUTHORIZED BY LAW, AS SHALL BE DETERMINED WITHIN THE DISCRETION OF THE CITY COUNCIL, PROVIDED THAT SUCH INTEREST RATE OR RATES ON ANY SERIES OR ISSUE OF SAID BONDS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM LEGAL LIMIT IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF ISSUANCE OF EACH SUCH SERIES OR ISSUE, FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING PERMANENT STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE CITY, AND TO LEVY AN ANNUAL TAX ON ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY SUFFICIENT TO PAY THE INTEREST ON SAID BONDS AS IT ACCRUES AND TO CREATE AND PROVIDE A SINKING FUND TO PAY THE PRINCIPAL OF SAID BONDS AS IT MATURES? PROPOSITION 5 SHALL THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS (THE "CITY "), BE AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE THE BONDS OF THE CITY, IN ONE OR MORE SERIES OR ISSUES, IN THE AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $2,180,000 WITH THE BONDS OF EACH SERIES OR ISSUE, RESPEC- TIVELY, TO MATURE SERIALLY OR OTHERWISE WITHIN NOT TO EXCEED 40 YEARS FROM THEIR DATE, AT ANY PRICE OR PRICES AND BEARING INTEREST AT ANY RATE OR RATES NOT TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM IN- TEREST RATE NOW OR HEREAFTER AUTHORIZED BY LAW, AS SHALL BE DETERMINED WITHIN THE DISCRETION OF THE CITY COUNCIL, PROVIDED THAT SUCH INTEREST RATE OR RATES ON ANY SERIES OR ISSUE OF SAID BONDS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM LEGAL LIMIT IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF ISSUANCE OF EACH SUCH SERIES OR ISSUE, FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING AND PERMANENTLY EQUIPPING FIRE STATION BUILDINGS FOR THE CITY, AND TO LEVY AN ANNUAL TAX ON ALL TAX- ABLE PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY SUFFICIENT TO PAY THE INTEREST ON SAID BONDS AS IT ACCRUES AND TO CREATE AND PROVIDE A SINKING FUND TO PAY THE PRINCIPAL OF SAID BONDS AS IT MATURES? Q. 10514 -12 PROPOSITION 6 SHALL THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS (THE "CITY "), BE AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE THE BONDS OF THE CITY, IN ONE OR MORE SERIES OR ISSUES, IN THE AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $410,000 WITH THE BONDS OF EACH SERIES OR ISSUE, RESPEC- TIVELY, TO MATURE SERIALLY OR OTHERWISE WITHIN NOT TO EXCEED 40 YEARS FROM THEIR DATE, AT ANY PRICE OR PRICES AND BEARING INTEREST AT ANY RATE OR RATES NOT TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM IN- TEREST RATE NOW OR HEREAFTER AUTHORIZED BY LAW, AS SHALL BE DETERMINED WITHIN THE DISCRETION OF THE CITY COUNCIL, PROVIDED THAT SUCH INTEREST RATE OR RATES ON ANY SERIES OR ISSUE OF SAID BONDS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM LEGAL LIMIT IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF ISSUANCE OF EACH SUCH SERIES OR ISSUE, FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING ADDITIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO THE EXISTING CITY HALL BUILDING, AND TO LEVY AN ANNUAL TAX ON ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY SUFFICIENT TO PAY THE INTER- EST ON SAID BONDS AS IT ACCRUES AND TO CREATE AND PROVIDE A SINKING FUND TO PAY THE PRINCIPAL OF SAID BONDS AS IT MATURES? PROPOSITION 7 SHALL THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS (THE "CITY "), BE AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE THE BONDS OF THE CITY, IN ONE OR MORE SERIES OR ISSUES, IN THE AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $2,290,000 WITH THE BONDS OF EACH SERIES OR ISSUE, RESPEC- TIVELY, TO MATURE SERIALLY OR OTHERWISE WITHIN NOT TO EXCEED 40 YEARS FROM THEIR DATE, AT ANY PRICE OR PRICES AND BEARING INTEREST AT ANY RATE OR RATES NOT TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM IN- TEREST RATE NOW OR HEREAFTER AUTHORIZED BY LAW, AS SHALL BE DETERMINED WITHIN THE DISCRETION OF THE CITY COUNCIL, PROVIDED THAT SUCH INTEREST RATE OR RATES ON ANY SERIES OR ISSUE OF SAID BONDS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM LEGAL LIMIT IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF ISSUANCE OF EACH SUCH SERIES OR ISSUE, FOR THE PURPOSE OF PURCHASING AND /OR IMPROVING LANDS FOR PARK PURPOSES, AND TO LEVY AN ANNUAL TAX ON ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY SUFFICIENT TO PAY THE INTEREST ON SAID BONDS AS IT ACCRUES AND TO CREATE AND PROVIDE A SINKING FUND TO PAY THE PRINCIPAL OF SAID BONDS AS IT MATURES? PROPOSITION 8 SHALL THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS (THE "CITY "), BE AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE THE BONDS OF THE CITY, IN ONE OR MORE SERIES OR ISSUES, IN THE AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $300,000 WITH THE BONDS OF EACH SERIES OR ISSUE, RESPEC- TIVELY, TO MATURE SERIALLY OR OTHERWISE WITHIN NOT TO EXCEED 40 YEARS FROM THEIR DATE, AT ANY PRICE OR PRICES AND BEARING INTEREST AT ANY RATE OR RATES NOT TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM IN- TEREST RATE NOW OR HEREAFTER AUTHORIZED BY LAW, AS SHALL BE DETERMINED WITHIN THE DISCRETION OF THE CITY COUNCIL, PROVIDED THAT SUCH INTEREST RATE OR RATES ON ANY SERIES OR ISSUE OF SAID BONDS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM LEGAL LIMIT IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF ISSUANCE OF EACH SUCH SERIES OR ISSUE, FOR THE PURPOSE OF PURCHASING AND IMPROVING A BUILDING FOR A HISTORICAL MUSEUM FOR THE CITY, AND TO LEVY AN ANNUAL TAX ON ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY SUFFICIENT TO PAY THE INTEREST ON SAID BONDS AS IT ACCRUES AND TO CREATE AND PROVIDE A SINKING FUND TO PAY THE PRINCIPAL OF SAID BONDS AS IT MATURES? Section 3. Voting machines shall be used for said elec- tion, except that paper ballots shall be used for absentee -7- 10514 -13 voting by mail, and the official ballots for the election shall be prepared in accordance with the Texas Election Code so as to permit the electors to vote "FOR" or "AGAINST" the aforesaid PROPOSITIONS, which shall be set forth on all official ballots in substantially the following form: OFFICIAL BALLOT [ ] FOR ) THE ISSUANCE OF $2,290,000 [ ] AGAINST ) - -- PARK BONDS PROPOSITION 8 FOR ) THE ISSUANCE OF $300,000 [ ) AGAINST ) - -- MUSEUM BUILDING BONDS Each elector using voting machines and desiring to vote in favor of a proposition shall move the voting pointer so as to indicate "FOR" the proposition, and each elector desiring to vote against a proposition shall move the voting pointer so as to indicate "AGAINST" the proposition. Each absentee elector -8- PROPOSITION 1 ( ] FOR ) THE ISSUANCE OF $3,540,000 [ ] AGAINST ) - -- WATERWORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT BONDS PROPOSITION 2 [ ] FOR ) THE ISSUANCE OF $6,340,000 [ ] AGAINST ) - -- SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT BONDS PROPOSITION 3 [ ] FOR ) THE ISSUANCE OF $4,000,000 [ ] AGAINST ) - -- DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT BONDS PROPOSITION 4 [ ] FOR ) THE ISSUANCE OF $4,940,000 [ ] AGAINST ) - -- STREET IMPROVEMENT BONDS PROPOSITION 5 [ ] FOR ) THE ISSUANCE OF $2,180,000 [ j AGAINST ) - -- FIRE STATION BONDS PROPOSITION 6 [ ] FOR ) THE ISSUANCE OF $410,000 [ j AGAINST ) - -- CITY HALL IMPROVEMENT BONDS PROPOSITION 7 [ ] FOR ) THE ISSUANCE OF $2,290,000 [ ] AGAINST ) - -- PARK BONDS PROPOSITION 8 FOR ) THE ISSUANCE OF $300,000 [ ) AGAINST ) - -- MUSEUM BUILDING BONDS Each elector using voting machines and desiring to vote in favor of a proposition shall move the voting pointer so as to indicate "FOR" the proposition, and each elector desiring to vote against a proposition shall move the voting pointer so as to indicate "AGAINST" the proposition. Each absentee elector -8- 10514 -14 using a paper ballot shall vote on each proposition by placing an "X" or other clear mark in the square beside the statement indicating the way such elector wishes to vote on the proposition. Section 4. Notice of such election shall be given by posting a substantial copy of this ordinance at three (3) public places in the City and also at the City Hall not less than fifteen (15) days prior to the date set for the election, and by publication thereof on the same day in each of two (2) suc- cessive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation published within the City, the date of the first publication to be not less than fourteen (14) days prior to the date set for the election. Section 5. It is hereby officially found and determined that the probable period of usefulness of each of the projects described in the foregoing PROPOSITIONS is forty years. Section 6. All or any portion of the bonds described in the aforesaid PROPOSITIONS 1 through 8, the issuance of which is approved at the election, may be combined and issued as one or more issues or series of bonds. Section 7. The issuance of the bonds described in the aforesaid PROPOSITIONS 1 through 8 is hereby authorized subject to approval at the election as hereinabove set out; and, sub- ject to said approval at the election and during each year while any of the bonds described in the aforesaid PROPOSITIONS 1 through 8 are outstanding and unpaid, the City Council shall compute and ascertain a rate and amount of ad valorem tax which will be sufficient to raise and produce the money required to pay the interest on the bonds as such interest comes due and to provide and maintain a sinking fund adequate to pay the prin- cipal of such bonds as such principal matures but never less than 2% of the original principal amount of said bonds as a sinking fund each year; and said tax shall be based on the latest approved tax rolls of the City with full allowance being WE 10514 -15 made for tax delinquencies and the cost of tax collection. Said rate and amount of ad valorem tax are hereby levied, and are hereby ordered to be levied, against all taxable property in the City for each year while any of said bonds or interest coupons appertaining thereto are outstanding and unpaid; and said tax shall be assessed and collected each such year. Said ad valorem tax sufficient to provide for the payment of the interest on and principal of said bonds, as such interest comes due and such principal matures, is hereby pledged irrevocably for such payment within the limits prescribed by law. Section 8. Said election shall be held in accordance with the Texas Election Code, except as modified by the Federal Voting Rights Act of 1965, as amended. Section 9. This ordinance was read once by the City Council and shall take effect immediately. Section 10. It is hereby officially found and determined that the need of the City for such financing creates an emer- gency and an urgent public necessity for the holding, at the scheduled time, of the meeting of the City Council at which this ordinance is adopted and for the adoption of this ordi- nance; and the NOTICE OF MEETING relating to said meeting and heretofore posted by the City Clerk, and the posting thereof, are hereby authorized, approved, adopted, and ratified. PASSED AND APPROVED this 14th day of May, 1981. /s/ Emmett 0. Hutto ATTEST: Mayor CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS /s/ Eileen P. Hall City Clerk CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS APPROVED: (SEAL) /s/ Randall B. Strong City Attorney CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS -10- 10514 -16 YOU WILL, THEREFORE, TAKE NOTICE of all matters and facts set out in the foregoing notice and ordinance. /s/ Eileen P. Hall City Clerk CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS (SEAL) 10514 -17 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - May 14, 1981 As indicated by Certificate of Ordinance, Councilman Simmons moved for adoption of the proposed ordinance; Councilwoman Wilbanks seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None Consider Proposed Ordinance, Setting Public Hearing on Proposed Annexation of Tierra Del Oro, Section Nos. 2 and 3 The area being proposed for annexation is just north of Whispering Pines and just east of Raccoon. The Administra- tion recommended setting a public hearing on this proposed annexation for 7:00 p.m., May 28. Councilman Johnson moved to adopt the proposed ordi- nance, setting the public hearing on the proposed annexation of Tierra Del Oro, Section Nos. 2 and 3 for 7 :00 p.m., May 28. Councilman Fuller seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 3143 AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE, TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TIERRA DEL ORO, SECTIONS 2 AND 3, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF SUCH PUBLIC HEARING; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFEC- TIVE DATE HEREOF. Consider Proposed Ordinance, Setting Public Hearing on Proposed Annexation of Raven Way Subdivision and Adjacent Land A map posted in the Council Chamber depicted the location of Raven Way Subdivision, along with the adjacent parcel being proposed for annexation. The Administration recommended setting a public hearing on this proposed annexa- tion for 7:15 p.m. on May 28. The developers of Raven Way Subdivision have requested annexation. The Administration is recommending that the small adjacent parcel be annexed to square the city limits in that area. Access to the small parcel can be obtained through Chaparral Village. Councilman Cannon moved for adoption of the proposed ordinance, setting the public hearing on the proposed annexa- tion of Raven Way Subdivision and adjacent parcel for 7:15 p.m. on May 28. Councilwoman Wilbanks seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None 10514 -18 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - May 14, 1981 ORDINANCE NO. 3144 AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE, TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF RAVEN WAY SUBDIVISION; AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF SUCH PUBLIC HEARING; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Consider Proposed Ordinance, First Reading on Proposed Annexation of 4.3 Acres West of San Jacinto Mall The proposed annexation is where Lone Star Bank is located. No opposition was expressed at the public hearing on the proposed annexation. The Administration recommended approval of the proposed ordinance. Councilman Simmons moved for adoption of the ordinance; Councilman Johnson seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 3145 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXTENSION OF CERTAIN BOUNDARY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS, AND THE ANNEXATION OF 4.3 ACRES WEST OF SAN JACINTO MALL, WHICH SAID TERRITORY LIES ADJACENT TO AND ADJOINS THE PRESENT BOUNDARY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS. Consider Proposed Ordinance, Amending Section 28 -1 of the Code, Fencing of Private Swimming Pools The present ordinance requires the construction of a fence for private swimming pools, even if that pool is above ground and is equipped with a fence around the upper portion. On above ground pools, the pool itself is approximately 4 feet above ground with a fence above that of about 3 feet. A citizen who is purchasing an above ground pool has called to the Administrator's attention the fact that the present ordinance requires a fence be constructed that is lower in height than the above ground pool, including the 3 foot fence. Therefore, the Administration is recommending that the proposed ordinance be adopted which will provide that a swimming pool be totally enclosed and surrounded by a fence, wall or other solid structure, (which shall include the sides of an above ground pool) not less than forty -four (44) inches high. The ordinance will also provide that such fence, wall or other solid structure is secured to and touches the ground without gaps which prevent entry of persons and domestic animals under such fence, wall or other solid structure. Another provision of the ordinance is that every opening, ladder or stairway in or upon such fence, wall or other solid structure be equipped with a self - closing and self - latching device capable of keeping such openings closed and such ladders and stairways inaccessable. The Administration recommended approval of the ordinance. Councilman Johnson moved for adoption of the ordinance. He prefaced his motion with the statement that he had gone by to look at the pool in question and had discovered that the pool has a ladder that is retractable which locks up automatically. If a gate of any kind is placed across that section, this will prevent the ladder from rising. He felt 10514 -19 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - May 14, 1981 if the ladder is left, this will be an attractive nuisance. The owner could always place a padlock across there to secure the gate. Mayor Hutto pointed out that this pool is only one model and the ordinance has to apply to all. In response to questions from Council, Mr. Lanham explained that the ordinance provides the Chief Building Inspector with discretion with regard to fencing of a swimming pool in that natural barriers or obstructions such as bays, rivers, seawalls or bulkheads may be considered. Councilman Fuller seconded the ordinance. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 3146 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 28 -1 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN TO PROVIDE FOR THE FENCING OF SWIM- MING POOLS; CONTAINING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A REPEAL- ING CLAUSE; ESTABLISHING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Consider Proposed Ordinance, Amending Section 28J -1 of the Code, Exceptions to Payment of Ad Valorem Taxes, Subsection b, Adults 65 Years or Older Presently, there is a $25,000 homestead exemption which is based on an assessment ratio of 50 %. The proposed ordi- nance changes the exemption to $50,000 in anticipation of complying with the state law and utilizing 100% assessment ratio. In response to a question from Council, the City Attorney explained that the Property Tax Code makes the change to 100% assessment ratio effective January 1, 1981, which is the current tax year. Therefore, October bills will be on 100% assessment. Councilman Simmons moved for adoption of the ordinance; Councilman Philips seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 3147 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 28j, "TAXATION ", OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN TO INCREASE THE LIMITED RESIDENTIAL HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION FOR INDIVIDUALS 65 YEARS OR OLDER; PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE; CONTAINING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. 10514 -20 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - May 14, 1981 Consider Proposed Ordinance, Amending Section 28J -1 of the Code, Exceptions to Payment of Ad Valorem Taxes, Subsection a, Adults Disabled The proposed ordinance will accomplish the same change as the previous ordinance, except this ordinance is directed toward disabled adults. The Administration recommended approval of the ordinance. Councilwoman Wilbanks moved for adoption; Councilman Philips seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 3148 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 28A, "TAXATION ", OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN TO PROVIDE A LIMITED RESIDENTIAL HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN DISABLED INDI- VIDUALS; PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE; CONTAINING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Consider Proposed Ordinance, Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract with the Texas Department of Community Affairs for a Youth Conservation Corps Program The city has been offered a grant of $20,907 to continue the Youth Conservation Corps Program that the city has been involved in for the past five years. The city would hire 20 youths between the ages of 15 and 18 to work on various projects within the city parks. The Administration feels this is a very successful program and recommended.approval of the ordinance. Councilman Johnson moved for adoption of the ordinance; Councilman Simmons seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 3149 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS FOR YOUTH CONSERVATION CORPS PROGRAM; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Consent Agenda Mayor Hutto explained that unless a Council member had a question or expressed the desire to discuss an item separately, the Chair would entertain a motion to approve the consent agenda. Mr. Lanham explained that Consent Agenda Item No. p had been previously acted on by Council and should not have been included on the agenda. 10514 -21 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - May 14, 1981 Also, Mr. Lanham mentioned that the ordinance related to Consent Agenda Item No. a had been corrected to reflect that Harris County had requested the construction speed zone rather than Texas Department of Highways and Public Transpor- tation. Mayor Hutto spoke to Consent Agenda No. a. He stated that he was concerned that this project could extend to months which would result in a construction speed limit on a major thoroughfare for an extended period. The Mayor felt that the construction process itself would slow traffic and he pointed out that the county has established orange and black signs reflecting 35 mph. Also, there has been an officer directing traffic from time to time. The City Attorney pointed out that unless an ordinance is adopted by Council setting forth a 35 mph speed zone, the 35 mph zone could not be enforced. Mayor Hutto commented that the present situation is working well and that the traffic would move according to what the construction in the area would allow. Mayor Hutto inquired if Council would like to allow time to determine if Council should establish a construction speed zone and requested guidance from Council. . In response to a question from Council, Mr. Lanham stated that the motion could be that the Consent Agenda Item Nos. b through o be approved which would mean that Council would be taking no action on Item No. a. In response to an inquiry regarding the garbage bag contract, Mr. Lanham explained that the bidder had extended the time period for the bid price. Councilman Fuller inquired if the Administration had requested any printed matter regarding use of bags to keep Baytown clean. No printing had been specified; therefore, Councilman Fuller suggested that the Clean City Commission work on this. Norman Dykes, Director of Public Works /City Engineer, explained that with regard to the request for water service on Archer Road near Gentry Junior School, PVC pipe is accep- table. Those individuals will need to pay $250 buy -in charge, plus $250 tap charge and $3.00 more monthly on the minimum than residents inside the city. Regarding the rehabilitation of the home at 1217 Ash, there is no exterior painting involved other than to replace a small area that is rotted. Councilman Johnson moved to adopt the Consent Agenda as printed with the exception of Item No. a and with the under- standing that Item No. p has been removed from consideration. Councilman Cannon seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None 10514 -22 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - May 14, 1981 The consent agenda as set forth in the Council packet follows, including Item Nos. a and p which were excepted from the motion: a. Harris County's contractor has started work on the construction of Baker Road, between North Main Street and Bush Road. Proposed Ordinance No. 10514 -10, establishes a 35 m.p.h. construction speed zone on Baker Road between North Main and Bush Road. We recommend approval of Proposed Ordinance No. 10514 -10. b. On April 23, 1981, three bids were received for the purchase of a 1j ton utility truck for the Utility Construction Division. The agenda packet includes a tabulation of these bids. The low bid was submitted by San Jacinto Ford at a total cost of $17,729.15. Proposed Ordinance No. 10514 -11, awards the bid for the purchase of this utility truck to San Jacinto Ford. We recommend approval of Proposed Ordinance No. 10514 -11. C. On April 21, 1981, bids were received for the City's annual tire contract. The agenda packet includes a tabulation of these bids. There were a total of 24 different items bid. The low bidder for each item is underlined on the tabulation sheet. Proposed Ordinance No. 10514 -12, awards the bid to the low bidder for each item. We recommend approval of Proposed Ordinance No. 10514 -12. d. On April 21, 1981, three bids were received for the City's estimated annual supply of tubes. The agenda packet includes a tabulation of these bids. The low bid for each of the 24 items bid is underlined. Proposed Ordinance No. 10514 -13 awards the bid to the low bidder for each item. We recommend approval of Proposed Ordinance No. 10514 -13. e. On April 21, 1981, five bids were received for the purchase of the City's estimated annual supply of mud flaps. The agenda packet includes a tabulation of these bids. The low bid submitted by Ted's Supply, Inc. does not-meet specifications. The bid of Auto Parts Company in the amount of $2,430 is the low bid meeting specifications. This bid represents a 25% increase over last years bid. Proposed Ordinance No. 10514 -14, awards the bid for the estimated annual supply of mud flaps to Auto Parts Company. We recommend approval of Proposed Ordinance No. 10514 -14. f. On April 24, 1981, three bids were received for the purchase and installation of carpet for a portion of the Community Building. The agenda packet includes a tabulation of these bids. The low bid 10514 -23 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - May 14, 1981 was submitted by Carpet Town, Inc. at a total cost of $3,329.15. Proposed Ordinance No. 10514 -15, awards the bid for carpeting of the Community Building to Carpet Town, Inc. We recommend approval of Proposed Ordinance No. 10514 -15. g. On April 24, 1981, four bids were received for the purchase of the estimated annual supply of garbage bags. The agenda packet includes a tabulation of these bids. The low bid was submitted by Chicago Transparent Products at a total cost of $65,390 for 1,000,000 garbage bags.- This bid is a 1.5 percent decrease over the bid taken in May of 1980. Proposed Ordinance No. 10514 -16 awards the bid for garbage bags to Chicago Transparent Products. We recommend approval of Proposed Ordinance No. 10415 -16. h. On April 30, 1981, four bids were received for the purchase of the City's estimated annual supply of data processing paper. The agenda packet includes a tabulation of these bids. The low bid was submitted by Data Documents at a total cost of $5,163. Proposed Ordinance No. 10514 -17, awards the annual contract for data processing paper to Data Documents. We recommend approval of Proposed Ordinance No. 10514 -17. i. On April 21, 1981, two bids were received for the purchase of closed circuit video equipment for the Police Department jail. The agenda packet includes a tabulation of these bids. The low bid was submitted by Citadel Industries at a total cost of $3,605. Proposed Ordinance No. 10514 -18, awards the bid for closed circuit video system to Citadel Industries. We recommend approval of Proposed Ordinance No. 10514 -18. j. On May 6, 1981, three bids were received for the purchase of a wheel balancer for the Police garage. The agenda packet includes a tabulation of these bids. The low bid was submitted by Auto Scan Equipment Company at a total cost of $3,232.58. Proposed Ordinance No. 10514 -19, awards the bid for the purchase of a wheel balancer to Auto Scan Equipment Company. We recommend approval of Proposed Ordinance No. 10514 -19. k. On April 21, 1981, two bids were received for the purchase of a backhoe trailer for the Utility Construction Division. The agenda packet includes a tabulation of these bids. The low bid was submitted by Hyco Equipment Company, Inc. at a total cost of $4,585. Proposed Ordinance No. 10514 -20, awards the bid for the purchase of this backhoe trailer to Hyco Equipment Company. We recommend approval of Proposed Ordinance No. 10514 -20. 10514 -24 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - May 14, 1981 1. On May 6, 1981, bids were received for the rehabili- tation of the house at 1804 W. Humble under the Community Development Housing Rebilitation Program. The agenda packet includes a tabulation of these bids. The low bid was submitted by CMS Construction Company at a total cost of $5,688. The work involved includes repairing the roof, installing and repairing doors, repairing windows, repairing plumbing, installing new flooring material in the bathroom and kitchen, and painting. Proposed Ordinance No. 10514 -21, awards the bid for housing rehabilitation at 1804 W. Humble to CMS Construction Company. We recommend approval of Proposed Ordinance No. 10415 -21. M. Proposed Ordinance No. 10514 -22, awards the bid for the housing rehabilitation at 1217 Ash to C & J Painting at a total cost of $6,736.77. Six bids were received on this project. The agenda packet includes a tabulation of these bids. Work involves leveling and repairing the foundation, installing a new roof, repairing central heating unit, repairing floors, repairing cabinets and window panes. We recommend approval of Proposed Ordinanace No. 10514 -22. n. David Chandler, of 1822 E. Archer Road, and Rodney Roach, of 2000 E. Archer Road, have requested of the City Administration that they be allowed to tie on to the City's twelve inch water line at the west edge of the school district property on Archer Road. They would like to install approxi- mately 800 feet of two inch pvc line to provide them with water service. They understand that they will be required to install the line at their expense and pay the buy -in fee under the water line extension policy. They also understand that they will have to pay the rates for water service outside the City limits. We recommend approval of the request for water service for two residents on Archer Road near Gentry Junior School. o. On April 28, 1981, at 6:00 p.m. a gas well blew out in the vicinity of Alexander Drive and Glenn Road. The Fire Department and Police personnel responded to the scene and evacuated approximately 45 households. The Civil Defense Director, Fletcher Hickerson, declared a state of emergency from the time of the evacuation until the gas well was capped at 1:00 p.m. the following day. Proposed Resolution No. 770 confirms the declaration of the Civil Defense emergency. We recommend approval of Proposed Resolution No. 770. P. Proposed Resolution No. 771, authorizes the transfer of $1,000 from the general fund contingency account to the Civil Defense Budget to purchase diesel fuel for the standby emergency generator at City Hall. A new 1,000 gallon tank has been installed. We recommend approval of Proposed Resolution No. 771. 10514 -25 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - May 14, 1981 ORDINANCE NO. 3150 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF SAN JACINTO FORD FOR THE PURCHASE OF 1j TON UTILITY TRUCK AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF SEVENTEEN THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED TWENTY NINE & 15/100 ($17,729.15) DOLLARS. ORDINANCE NO. 3151 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF GENERAL TIRE SERVICE, CITY TIRE AND B.F. GOODRICH, FOR THE ANNUAL TIRE CONTRACT WITH COMPENSATION TO BE PAID TO BE BASED UPON THE ACTUAL QUAN- TITIES SUPPLIED. ORDINANCE NO. 3152 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF GENERAL TIRE SERVICE, CITY TIRE AND B.F. GOODRICH, FOR THE ANNUAL TUBE CONTRACT WITH COMPENSATION TO BE PAID TO BE BASED UPON THE ANNUAL QUAN- TITIES SUPPLIED. ORDINANCE NO. 3153 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF TED'S SUPPLY, INC. FOR THE ANNUAL MUD FLAP CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED THIRTY & NO 1100 ($2,430.00) DOLLARS. ORDINANCE NO. 3154 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF CARPET TOWN, INC., FOR THE PURCHASE OF CARPETING FOR THE COMMUNITY BUILDING AND AUTHO- RIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF THREE THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED TWENTY NINE & 15/100 ($3,329.15) DOLLARS. ORDINANCE NO. 3155 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF CHICAGO TRANSPARENT PRODUCTS FOR THE ANNUAL GARBAGE BAG CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF SIXTY FIVE THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED NINETY & N01100 ($65,390.00) DOLLARS. ORDINANCE NO. 3156 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF DATA DOCUMENTS FOR THE ANNUAL DATA PROCESSING PAPER CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF FIVE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED SIXTY THREE & N01100 ($5,163.00) DOLLARS. ORDINANCE NO. 3157 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF CITADEL INDUSTRIES FOR THE PURCHASE OF CLOSED CIRCUIT VIDEO EQUIPMENT AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF THREE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED FIVE & N01100 ($3,605.00) DOLLARS. ORDINANCE NO. 3158 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF AUTOSCAN EQUIPMENT FOR THE PURCHASE OF A WHEEL BALANCER AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF THREE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED THIRTY TWO & 58/100 ($3,232.58) DOLLARS. 10514 -26 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - May 14, 1981 ORDINANCE NO. 3159 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF HYCO EQUIPMENT, INC., FOR THE PURCHASE OF A BACKHOE TRAILER AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN OF THE SUM OF FOUR THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED EIGHTY FIVE & N01100 ($4,585.00) DOLLARS. ORDINANCE NO. 3160 AN ORDINANCE AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT 80 -01 -01 TO C.M.S. CONSTRUCTION FOR THE SUM OF FIVE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED EIGHTY EIGHT & N01100 ($5,688.00) DOLLARS. ORDINANCE NO. 3161 AN ORDINANCE AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT 80 -03 -02 TO C & J PAINTING FOR THE SUM OF SIX THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED THIRTY SIX & 77/100 ($6,736.77) DOLLARS. RESOLUTION NO. 771 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS, CONFIRMING THE DECLARATION BY THE CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY MANAGER OF THE EXISTENCE OF AN EMER- GENCY ON THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL. For tabulation of bid ,items, see Attachments A through K respectively. Discuss Report on Status of Solid Waste Disposal One of the recommendations of the Capital Improvements Committee was that no funds be included in the upcoming bond election with regard to solid waste disposal. The committee indicated that the city should take bids as soon as possible on a landfill site. The Administration has followed through on that recommendation. Dan Savage, Assistant City Manager, reviewed as background information the current status of solid waste disposal. Council approved a three -year contract with Gene Hazelwood, April 1, 1979. That was the second three -year contract that the city had entered into with Mr. Hazelwood. That contract is to expire March 31, 1982. Therefore, there is less than one year left on that particular contract. The Administration is recommending to Council that essentially the same specifications be utilized to acquire another landfill contract. A very critical part of the specifications relate to governmental approvals. Whoever is awarded the bid for landfill services must have the necessary permits and governmental approvals from all of the agencies involved in regulation of landfill operations. The landfill operator would have to produce evidence of being properly permitted and would have to adhere to regulations governing the operation of landfills. In terms of materials to be accepted by the landfill, the present specifications provide that the contractor shall accept for disposal all residential and commercial garbage and trash generated in the City of Baytown, whether delivered by automobile, truck or trailer, and any material collected under the city's gaxbage.and trash collection ordinance by the city. Hours of operation are to be 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on weekdays and 7 :30 a.m. to 12:00 noon on Saturdays. The landfill operator would be obligated to allow the city to inspect, at the city's pleasure, the landfill site 10514 -27 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - May 14, 1981 and to inspect records required by the contract. The landfill operator would be responsible for liability and workmens compensation insurance. In terms of method of payment, the city currently pays on a cubic yard basis. The city's vehicles are measured and a size for each vehicle has been determined and agreed on by the present landfill contractor. Under the new contract, the same process would be followed. In years past when bids were taken for landfill services, the bidders were asked to quote a one, two or three -year contract. In the case of Mr. Hazelwood, he has always bid a three -year contract with one price for the three -year period. The current price is $1.25 per cubic yard. The effect of inflation since bids were last received for this service has been felt by the city government, as well as landfill operators, including Mr. Hazelwood. The Administration recommended that in the specifications this time that the bidders be asked to bid a cubic yard price for each year of the proposed contract and that that be effective from April 1 of the current year through the next March 31. Landfill bids have always been evaluated using disposal costs and an estimated travel cost for city vehicles hauling the material to the landfill site. If the landfill is 30 miles from Baytown, obviously the city's transportation costs will be significantly greater. The Administration requested that Council approve the proposed specifications with the intent of advertising for bids and presenting a recommendation by June 11. Councilwoman Wilbanks stated that she had no problem with the bid form, but wondered if by going this route, this would eliminate other methods of waste disposal? Mr. Savage responded that if Councilwoman Wilbanks was referring to transfer stations or resource recovery processes, by going through the bidding process, the city would be obligating itself for the term of the contract. The Capital Improvements Study Committee in examining the question of transfer stations or resource recovery concluded that it was not likely that either of those options would be more economical than a landfill contract, at least for the immediate future. The Administation had checked with the cities of Pasadena and Galveston which utilize transfer station operations and the current costs of those cities' operations are about twice that of what the Administration feels the bids would be for a landfill contract. Councilwoman Wilbanks stated that immediately after accepting bids for a landfill contract, work needs to begin on what alternatives can be pursued with regard to solid waste disposal. Mr. Savage stated that the study committee had recom- mended at least two years lead time. In terms of getting a permit for another landfill operation, that is a realistic time frame and if a transfer station is to be constructed, it would still probably require two years to get the permit and get the facility constructed. Mr. Savage, in response to comments from Council, explained that with regard to escalation clause in the proposed bid document, the issue is risk. The bidder is going to try to protect his risk. The problem is what are the costs going to be for the future. The bidder will have to make that judgement and the Administration will need to determine whether or not to accept that judgement. 10514 -28 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - May 14, 1981 The Administration recommended approval of the invitation to bid, including the bid form. Mr. Hazelwood is projecting that the present landfill will last another five -year period. He recently acquired a compactor designed to compact garbage much more efficiently than dozers. That particular landfill was permitted in 1976; therefore, the Administation assumes that that projection may be optimistic. Councilman Philips moved to approve the invitation to bid, including the bid form; Councilman Fuller seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None Discuss Industrial District Contract Following adoption by City Council of a new industrial district policy, the City Attorney began work on a standard industrial district contract that would be used in negotiations with all industries. Since the Exxon contract is the first one to expire, there has been some negotiations with Exxon. The City Attorney explained that the draft which had been prepared is very similar to the existing contract. The city and industry agree that approximately 20% of the area of the industry, pursuant to the industrial district policy, will be annexed. The city will not attempt to annex other parts of the industry outside this area. Also, the city agrees that it will not extend to the property within the district any rules, regulations governing plats and subdivision of land, prescribe any zoning, building or inspection codes, or any other attempts to exercise control over the conduct of the industry's business. The city will not levy taxes on that property within the industrial district. In return the industry would agree that the city would not have to supply sewer or water service, police or fire protection, street repairs or garbage pickup service. However, the industry would agree to pay to the city an industrial district payment in lieu of taxes. The main change in the contract is that the contract incorporates the formula that is part of the policy that Council adopted in a previous meeting. The formula basically has three components. The industrial district payment is calculated by taking a full -value payment, then subtracting the tax payment on the 20% that is annexed. The city would have the entire plant of the industry appraised to determine the tax, take 350 of that value which would be the total payment due by the industry - -part of that payment would be in taxes and the remainder industrial district payment. Because of some unanswered questions concerning the Harris County Central Appraisal District, in 1981 the parties would agree that the value of the portions of the industry, both inside and outside the industrial district area, would be determined by independent appraisers selected by the City of Baytown. Whenever the Harris County Central appraisal District becomes effective, they will appraise the portion of the industry within the city limits of Baytown for purposes of determining the industry's tax payment. However, the city will still be able to hire independent appraisers to value the entire plant for purposes of determining the full - value payment of the formula. 10514 -29 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - May 14, 1981 If an industry disagrees with the value placed on its property by the appraisal, it can go to the Board of Equal- ization to request an adjustment until the Harris County. Central Appraisal District takes over the equalization functions. Then the city will create an Industrial District Review Board, which will perform the same functions as the Board of Equalization for these industries who dispute the city's evaluation of their property. Again, this Industrial District Review Board will begin operation whenever Harris County Central Appraisal District assumes the Board of Equalization functions. Until such time as that happens, the Board of Equalization will continue to operate as the Industrial District Review Board. The proposed contract contains an arbitration provision which is the same as the present contract. If an industry is dissatisfied with the decision made by the Board of Equalization or the Industrial District Review Board, arbitration can be requested. If the parties cannot agree on an arbitrator, then each party selects one arbitrator and the two arbitrators select a third. This arbitration panel will make a decision as to the value of the property. If either party is dissatisfied with that decision, a suit may be filed in the district court. The remainder of the contract is almost identical to the present contract, with the exception of an addition regarding the city's drainage regulations. The last clause of the contract has been somewhat broadened to provide that if any of the terms or conditions of the contract are rendered ineffective by the constitution, the legislature or by the implementation of the Tax Code, or interpretation of that code by the tax assessment board, the parties can alter the contract to carry out the original intent. The Administration explained that no approval of the standard contract would be necessary. The Administration was only attempting to apprise Council and solicit input from Council. Councilman Philips stated that the City Attorney had done an excellent job in drafting the contract and that the feedback he had received was that the contract was generally acceptable to Exxon. Consider Authorizing Engineering Study for Proposal on Police Department Radios Another recommendation of the Capital Improvements Study Committee was to take the police radios out of the bond program and finance same by other alternatives. Council discussed this at a previous meeting and determined that there would be the need of an engineering study. The radio shop is under Chief Turner whose feeling it is that the study should be broad enough to include other depart- ments who utilize radios. Councilman Cannon mentioned that the area to the north should certainly be considered in this planning. He also mentioned that it may be necessary to perfect the changes in the system by phases. The Administration requested approval of Council to invite proposals from engineering firms to study the city's radio needs. 10514 -30 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - May 14, 1981 Councilman Cannon moved to authorize the Administration to invite proposals from engineering firms to study the City's radio needs; Councilman Philips seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None In response to a request from Council, Mr. Lanham stated that proposals would be taken to reflect an estimate of what the total cost would be to perform the overall changes to the radio system for the entire city, as well as individual estimates of projects so that improvements could be effected in phases. Consider Approval of Physical Fitness Testing Program Council had discussed implementation of a physical fitness testing program at the last meeting and had been furnished information concerning the proposed program. Councilman Cannon commented that this appeared to be a very good program, but he had a problem with making the program mandatory for members of the fire and police depart- ment since this was not a condition of employment. Larry Patterson, Director of Personnel, emphasized that the planned program is an employee physical fitness testing program. Therefore, at this time what will initially be happening is an assessment process as opposed to saying there is a standard that one must meet. Until the testing is performed throughout the organization, it would be very difficult to establish a standard, but the testing would be used as an assessment technique. Through that, a standard could be developed for entrance into the fire and police departments. In response to an inquiry from Council, Mr. Patterson explained that what the Administration is requesting now is the development of a physical fitness testing program and the administrtion of an assessment process. Councilman Cannon emphasized that what the Administration was requesting is approval of a testing program which will not be mandatory with regard to a set standard of physical fitness until Council approval is obtained. Mr. Patterson responded in the affirmative. Councilman Philips moved to approve the physical fitness testing program; Councilman Cannon seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None 10514 -31 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - May 14, 1981 Consider Approval of Data Processing Work Plan Several meetings ago Council had requested that the Administration develop a work plan for Council considera- tion. Dan Savage, Assistant City Manager, reviewed for Council the fact that during the budget work sessions last July, the Administration had presented the concept of replacing the present city hall computer and consolidating the functions being performed on that computer with the equipment at the police station by upgrading the police computer. Mr. Savage stated that basically the city needs to acquire significant additional hardware. The computer itself needs to be expanded from 160K to 480K which would allow for an on -line operation or the ability to run several jobs simultaneously. The present computer has two 80 magabite disc drives which means that 80 million characters can be stored on each. The proposal is to add two additional 80NIB disc drives for 320 million bites of on -line storage. The police computer presently has four terminals (CRT's). The proposal is to acquire an additional 10 CRT's to perform functions in Municipal Court and in City Hall for a total of 14 terminals. The present computer has the capability of printing 450 lines per minute. The proposal is to upgrade that upward for a speed of 650 lines per minute.. Two remote printers are being proposed, along with addition of three controllers to operate the terminals and remote printers. Two data lines will be installed to allow terminals in city hall to interface with computer at the police station. Also, the Administration is proposing that bids be taken to acquire financial packages that are available on the market place in the area of payroll, accounts payable and general ledger. In terms of cost estimates, the present hardware that is located in city hall, cost just over $40,000 per year for lease purchase fee and maintenance of the equipment. Lease purchase expires in August, 1981, but the maintenance fee is approximately $20,000 per year. Because of the age of the equipment, it is very likely that the cost will continue to escalate. The equipment at the police station is currently costing $35,000 per year for lease purchase and maintenance. Therefore, the present hardware costs are $75,000 per year. The city could acquire the proposed equipment in a number of fashions - -buy outright, rent, lease on three /five year purchase option. Therefore, the city would be looking at a yearly cost of between $75,000 to $92,000, depending on what type financing option is selected. If a lease- option purchase were selected, at the end of the period, the city would have continuing maintenance costs but would own the hardware. The estimate on the software packages is $7,500 which is a one -time purchase price. Regarding a development schedule, Mr. Savage proposed installing existing applications that are currently on city hall computer at the police station. Payroll and accounts payable would be packages that would be acquired, while water and tax billing would be implemented by the consultant who has developed both type billings for other cities. The city's cost there would be installation and not development of the code. In terms of new applications, the police system that has been developed to date is based on processing of jail records. Sergeant Schafer is presently designing offense reports for the police system. Council expressed a definite interest when the police computer was first dis- cussed in developing a Municipal Court application. A general ledger package is available through Honeywell. 10514 -32 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - May 14, 1981 Personnel and work order systems would need to be developed from scratch. Mr. Savage requested approval of Council to advertise for bids on the proposed software and hardware and to attempt to bring the bids to Council in June. In response to an inquiry from Council, Mr. Savage stated that no matter what is decided, he felt that the existing equipment at City Hall would need to be replaced because it is of 1960 technology which is very outdated. It cannot operate more than one job at a time which makes it rather labor intensive in terms of computers today. From the software standpoint, the vendor, in this case Honeywell, is no longer maintaining the operating software for that system. Therefore, that system must be replaced. However, Council would have the option of maintaining a city hall computer, but if the city has two data processing sites, this basically means that the city must maintain two staffs and if the equipment is not compatible, then there is no backup unless it is provided at each site. In terms of the type equipment at the police station, when it was acquired, one of the things considered was the upward expandability of the equipment. Basically, the specifications were developed so that the equipment could be expanded six -fold with the exception of the printers speed, that has three -fold growth capability. Therefore, the investment that the city has in the hardware at the police station is one that is designed to provide growth capability. The city could purchase another computer for city hall, but from a cost standpoint, that would not be cost effective since there would be two operations to maintain and manage. Another consideration is that one data processing work site, would free up space. In terms of maintaining two sites, another issue is how to manage two sites. Would there be decentralized management which could encourage additional sites. Council could go either way and probably achieve the desired results. With regard to purchase of packages, when a package is purchased, it is necessary to have that package installed and maintained. In response to Council, Mr. Savage explained that the data processing consultant is paid a sum each month, but at year's end, he is paid for the actual number of hours worked. The basic undertaking that the city has been involved in for the last 15 -16 months has been the police application. The consultant has been expending approximately 750 of his time toward that application. Some additional time is expended toward weekly management meetings to work our work schedules and maintenance work on existing programs. The work plan developed for the police department called for a system to be developed for the records division of the police department. In July, 1980, the decision was made to implement a system to produce jail information. That system has been designed and implemented and at this point, the jailers are being trained. As previously mentioned, Sergeant Schafer is presently designing an offense report which the consultant will utilize to prepare a program. The consultant has assisted throughout this process. However, the decision to establish a system for the jail rather than records was made by Mr. Savage and representatives of the police department. With regard to applications being proposed, the financial packages -- payroll, accounts payable and the ledger system are Honeywell packages. The consultant suggested that the Administration review those packages for consideration. Mr. Savage stated that personally, he perferred to utilize, where possible, packages available on the market. 10514 -33 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - May 14, 1981 With regard to a question from Council concerning funding, Mr. Savage responded that the total sum budgeted for hardware was $95,000. The amount being expended on the present hardware is $75,000. The most costly option listed would result in a charge of $92,000 per year. If the same budget for hardware is maintained, the hardware could be acquired without increasing the bottom line figure in the data processing budget. There would be other increases in the budget because of personnel costs and other things. The present hardware budget is either $90,000 or $92,000. If all these applications can be put on line, Mr. Savage felt that the staff requirements for data processing would be reduced at some future point. In the future, the city should be in the position to maintain two operators and an individual who is capable of maintenance programming. He felt that the data processing department should not be involved in day to day data entry. With on line equipment, the data entry would be in the user department. The proposal of the Administration is based on previous budget discussions that involved a centralized plant for data processing. In response to concerns expressed by Council, Mr. Savage stated that if Council determined to decentralize then the entire process would need to be reinstituted with regard to developing specifications and considering approach. Mr. Savage outlined some of the pros and cons involving centralization versus decentrailization. With decentralization, the user department has a set of resources with control over those resources. Usually, there is some capability of programming and maintaining the equipment with the opportunity to sdhedule operations as needed. If something goes wrong in their operation, it usually does not affect another department's operations. Usually, in a decentralized operation, there is smaller units at each particular location; however, probably there is a lower level of expertise, than in a centralized shop. In a centralized shop, there is usually a large piece of equipment and the issues are usually how to divide the resources, who has priority, what applications will be done first and how. Usually, in a situation like that there is a fairly even development in terms of capability and in terms of cost to the organization, whereas in a decentralized operation the aggressive departments have a first -class operation and others may lag behind. There is no risk -free way of addressing the question of centralization versus decentralization. The recommendation of the Administration is one that involves centralization and a large sophisticated piece of hardware which requires a programming capability which is fairly technical - -multi processing in a communica- tions environment. There are definite trade -offs. If the city hires a consultant to perform a study and he spends a year to recommend expansion of the police computer system, that equipment will be one year older with very little to show. However, if Council determines to approve the pro- posal, there are no guarantees that this will be the best approach. Councilman Cannon commented that perhaps it would be worthwhile to have a review performed by some professionals. There is a data processing department at the University of Houston. Exxon has all kinds of computer experts. Perhaps it would be worthwhile to get some of these people to look at the situation. Mr. Savage responded that the auditor for the city had reviewed the data processing development plan prepared in July, 1980 and had responded by letter to that plan. Mr. Savage highlighted the letter for Council. In summary, the auditors stated that although they may disagree with some of the specific recommendations of the plan, they did agree with its overall implications. 10514 -34 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - May 14, 1981 Council discussed the feasibility of hiring a computer programmer on a full time basis. To accomplish this, the programmer would command a salary of $35,000 per year, plus benefits and the city could as in the past serve as a training ground for these individuals who would move on, leaving the city in the same situation as in the past. Mr. Lanham pointed out that the question being considered is whether to centralize or decentralize. He suggested to Council that the Administration had performed to the best of its ability; therefore, if Council felt more study should be made, Council should consider outside assistance. Councilman Philips moved to accept the data processing decision being proposed by the Administration in light that funds are available to support that decision. Councilman Philips added that the decision had been studied thoroughly and he felt the users are going to have input and the centralized operation will meet the city's needs. Councilman Fuller seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Wilbanks and Fuller Mayor Hutto Nays: Council members Simmons and Cannon Consider Proposed Resolution, Establishing a Policy with Regard to Council Travel Council had requested that the Administration develop a travel policy for City Council members traveling outide the City of Baytown on city business. The proposed resolution establishes the policy that Council members traveling out - of -town on city business will be reimbursed. The policy provides that when possible, City Council shall authorize such trips, but if time limitations prevent a Council member from receiving prior approval, that member must seek approval at the first City Council meeting after the travel is completed. Expenses necessary to attend the annual meetings of the U.S. Conference of Mayors, the National League of Cities, and the Texas Municipal League, as well as meetings of the Harris County Mayors and Councilmen Association and the Houston - Galveston Area Council are approved with no further approval of expenses to be required. With regard to expenses of spouses, Council members are authorized to take their spouses to the meetings listed above and the council member will be reimbursed expenses, including travel expenses of his or her spouse. A Council member may also be reimbursed for expenses of his or her spouse on other out -of -town trips, if such reimbursement is approved by City Council prior to the trip. All other travel would be governed by existing policy for city personnel. Mr. Lanham stated that he would suggest that the resolution ' be amended to provide that any meeting of Texas Municipal League would be automatically approved; Council concurred. Councilman Simmons stated that he felt it to be improper to expend tax dollars to pay for expenses of spouses and moved that the resolution be amended to exclude that provision. Mayor Hutto stated that he felt spouses made significant contributions and he could see no problem with that especially, since that is the policy of surrounding communities. Councilman Simmons stated he could see no problem with spouses attendance, but he felt that the council members should pay for spouses' fees. He felt this to be a matter of principle. 10514 -35 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - May 14, 1981 Councilwoman Wilbanks stated that she had received a call from a citizen who had taken very much the same stance as Councilman Simmons. Councilwoman Wilbanks seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Simmons and Wilbanks Nays: Council members Philips, Johnson, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Jean Shepherd, a citizen of Baytown, stated that she did not feel that the activities of the wives would be beneficial to the city and that the Charter provides that a Council member may be reimbursed for his expenses, not that of the spouse. Councilman Johnson moved to adopt the proposed resolu- tion with the change suggested by the Administration; Councilman Philips seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: Council members Simmons and Wilbanks RESOLUTION NO. 772 A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A TRAVEL POLICY FOR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TRAVELING OUTSIDE THE CITY OF BAYTOWN ON CITY BUSINESS, AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Consider Proposed Resolution, Nominating Representative to Fill the Vancancy on the Board of Directors of the Harris County Appraisal District Two members of the Board of Directors of the Harris County Appraisal District have resigned and the law estab- lishing the board provides that nominees names will be submitted by the various governing bodies and the members of the Board of Directors will then elect by majority vote one of the nominees to fill the vacancy. When this board was established initially Harris County Mayors and Councilmens Association recommended a number of people to serve. Several of those persons were selected, two of the persons not selected were E. E. Stevens from Houston, who was the past Tax - Assessor for the Clearcreek Independent School District and the other person was Dr. Marlin 0. Cherry from Deer Park, who is associated with San Jacinto College. According to Mayor Meza from LaPorte, the Harris County Mayors and Councilmens Association is recommending these two people. If Council would like to go along with that recommendation, action needs to be taken tonight. Councilman Johnson moved to accept the recommendation of the Harris County Mayors and Councilmens Association by nominating E. E. Stevens and Marlin 0. Cherry. Councilwoman Wilbanks seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None 10514 -36 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - May 14, 1981 RESOLUTION NO. 773 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS, NOMINATING E. E. STEVENS & MARLIN 0. CHERRY FOR THE OFFICE OF DIRECTOR, HARRIS COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT, FOR THE TERM BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 1981. Consider Proposed Ordinance, Appointing a Board of Equalization to Serve for 1981 No action. Consider Appointment to the Planning Commission Mr. Lanham had contacted the members of the Planning Commission whose terms are to expire and each had expressed a willingness to serve. Those members are Attorney, Woody Butler; Realtor, Charley Walker; Citizens -at- Large, Rick Edwards, Richard A. Whiddon and Dal Grigg. Councilman Philips moved that those individual be reappointed to serve on the Planning Commission; Councilman Fuller seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Philips, Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks, Fuller and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None Adjourn There being no further business to be conducted, the meeting was adjourned. P Eileen P. Hall, City Clerk +� a� I; U cd TITLE t t/2 TON UTILITY TRUCK DAT E� ��a A.� 98 � _ TEM QTY ( DESCRlPTlON i. 1 r;ach 1 1/2 TON UTILITY TRUCK; per specifications Make /Model Delivery A.R.O. GROSS TOTAL LESS DrSC. NET IOTA L �Ft tVFRY CITY OF BAYTOWN B!D TA BULaT! ON �• Joe Camp Inc. Port Cit Ford Truck San Jacinto Ford UN17 EXTENDED UNIT DcTENDEO UN17 XT ND 0 UN1 �RrCE _ � 519,7t7.t8 St8,2zo.a0 $17,729.15 Ford -- F 00 Ford--F 700 Ford - -F700 60 to 150 days 60 to 150 days 90 to 120 days I CITY OF BAYTOWN TITLES ANNUAL TIRE AND TUBE CONTRACT (TIRES) BID TABULATION BID.- ,_814-5 DATE April 21, 1981 General Tire Service Cit Tire B.F. Goodrich TEM QTY DESCRIPTION I1�N!!T EXTENDED UNlT EXTENDED ND D UNlT � EXTENDED UNIT XT NO 0 UN ' E Cd 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 5. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 2l. 22. 23. 24. 50 each 10 each 75 each 50 each 30 each 54 each 15 each 50 each 32 each 10 each 2 each 8 each 20 each 20 each 60 each 8 each 10 each 12 each 12 each 12 each l: each 12 each 1 each 1 each ANNUAL TIRE AND TUBE CONTRACT; per specifications E70 x 14 195-751114 225 -701115 235 -70 -1115 225 -75 1115 670 x 15 700 x 15 750 x 15 750 x 16 800 x 16.5 875 x 16.5 111- x 16 SL 825 x 20 900 x 20 1000 x 20 1100 x 22.5 1300 x 24 13.6 x 28114 14.9 x 2484 17.5 x 24114 16.9 x 24114 16.9 x 30114 8- 16114 -TR 6- 12R4 -TR $ 38.56 33.54 $1,928.00 335.40 $ 40.99 42.96 58.45 59.96 49.99 42.96 49.99 118.48 54.99 52.97 62.96 67.80 $2,049.50 429.60 4,383.75 2,998.00 1,499.70 2,319.84 749.85 5,924.00 1,759.68 529.70 125.92 542.40 1 466.00 L42 419.20 6,405.75 4,392.00 1,527.90 1,683.72 583.95 38.68 2 56.00 48.53- 2!42 0 43. 1,302.90 28.s2 1 40.08 40.64 53.94 609.60 2,697-00 ,301.50 1,444.48 7.29 8.06 1,513.28 80.60 43.61 1 0 87.22 52.08 71.98 89.63 106.39 104.16 575.84 1,792.60 2,127.80 92.77 89.62 742.16 1,792.40 99.99 119.96 145.96 209.46 251.52 168.89 7,999.80 2,399.20 8,757.60 1,675.68 2,515.20 2,026.68 106-55 139.54 169.68 218.48 2, 3 .00 8,372.40 1,357.44 2,184.80 7.52 7,051.20 13 ,30 1,074.40 225.9 179.45 220.75 261.85 246.25 272.30 71.26 2,259. 0 2,153.40 2,649.00 3,178.20 2,955.00 3,267.60 71.26 no bid 178.29 - -0 -- 2,139.48 210.60 239.99 239.86 269.81 2,527.20 2,879.88 2,878.32 3,237.72 21 2,613.7- 222.24 2 666.88 no bid no bid no bid -- 0 -- - -0 -- - -0 -- no bid 45.00 - -0 -- 45.00 25-90 1 25-90 GROSS TOTAL $44,875.12 $54,254.22 $48,729.04 LESS DISC. NET TOTAL '471 II /9*PY ND D UNlT � EXTENDED T! TL E:.�� "NUA�L T IRE AND _TUBE CONTRACT [`TUBES ) B 1 D� �, a 4- 5�s,�_.� _..._.�_, DATE �� 18,.x_ QTY � DESCRIPTION 5. 30 each b. 54 each 7. 15 each 8. 50 each - 9. 32 each v 10. 10 each 11. 2 each � 12. 8 each � 13. 20 each v14. 20 each c� 15. 60 each +' 16. 8 each � 17. 10 each 18. 12 each 19. 12 each 20. 12 each 21. 12 each 22. 12 each 23. 1 each 24. 1 each ANNUAL TIRE AND TUBE CONTRACT; per specifications 225 -75 R15 670 x 15 700 x 15 750 x 15 750 x 16 800 x 16.5 875 x 16.5 11L x 16SL 825 x 20 900 x 20 1000 x 20 1100 x 22.5 1300 x 24 13.6 x 2884 14.9 x 24R4 17.5 x 24R4 16.9 x 2484 16.9 x 3084 ' 8- 16 -R4 -TR 6- 12 -R4 -TR G1 TY O F BAYTOWN B1D .TABULATION ': General Tire Service EXTENDED Cit UNIT Tire EXTENDED B.F. Goodrich UNIT XTENO O UNIT EXTEND UNIT EXTEN .UNIT 23 .5z 73.95 499.50 219.84 59.70 3.1 7.70 5.9 299.00 .2 tgg. Tbls. Tbls. 10.01 9.90 11.96 13.64 Tbls. 28.22 24.55 25.42 25.42 25.42 32.50 7.20 - - -- - - -- 80.08 198.00 239.20 818.40 - - -- 282.20 294.60 305.04 305.04 308.04 390.00 7.20 CROSS ToTA� LESS DISC. NET IOTA L f�''t I1 /t` qY $3,948.90 54,652.96 $3,713.01 s Tbis. 53.18 - - -- 5171.72 Tbls. $4.95 4.95 10.99 9.99 Tbls. Tbls. 11.99 15.96 15.96 15.96 Tbls. 27.50 19.97 19.97 22.99 - - - - -- $267.30 74.25 549.50 319.68 - - -- - - -- 95.92 319.20 3]9.20 957.60 - - -- 275.00 239.64 239.64 275.88 $4.38 $131.40 .3 4.93 9.99 6.87 5.97 23 .5z 73.95 499.50 219.84 59.70 3.1 7.70 5.9 299.00 .2 tgg. Tbls. Tbls. 10.01 9.90 11.96 13.64 Tbls. 28.22 24.55 25.42 25.42 25.42 32.50 7.20 - - -- - - -- 80.08 198.00 239.20 818.40 - - -- 282.20 294.60 305.04 305.04 308.04 390.00 7.20 .52 .1 9.30 1 .00 9.30 1 .00 11.3 17.70 1. 0 22. 22 0 1 .12 217. 18.91 22 .92 no i 19.38 -- -- 232.56 29. 0 29.80 no bid 4.95 357. 0 357.60 - -0 -- 4.95 2 .37 �1 . no bid no bid - -0 -- - -0 -- 6.00 6.00 CROSS ToTA� LESS DISC. NET IOTA L f�''t I1 /t` qY $3,948.90 54,652.96 $3,713.01 s G1TY Of� BAYTOV✓N Tl"I LE�e� ANN IAI�M�)��Fl A�TRAfT B1D TABULATION B ! D� 814 -sb ,. DArE� APr i 1 21 , 1981 rE�s Qri DESCRIPTION PUNITSu EXTEND D R UNIT ENOEO UNIT N UNIT XT NO 0 AUNIT artExTEN�E ANNUAL MUD FLAP. CONTRACT; per specifications Est. l 300 each Mud Flaps $14.25 $4,275.00 $13.00 $3,900.00-` $7.50 $2,250.00* $9.00 $2,700.00 $8.10 $2,430.00 Make /Model Gates 90332 none giv n none gi en Dayton 10040 Dayton 10040 K Delivery A.R.O. 2 -10 day 45 day 5 days 7 days 7 days Cash Di count Cash Di count Does n t meet 'Does n t meet 2� 10 days 2$ 10 days speci ications speci ications In lots of 100 Eight (8) companies were mailed minimu order bid invitations and all were contacted by telephone prior I to the bid opening. (iKVSJ I V IAL I HESS orsc. NEr rora� f'I..IVFRY TlTLE:� RPE,TING OF COMMUNITY _BUILDING BID: 814 -59 _ �s .� DATE APri 1 24, 1981 TEM QTY DESCRlPTlON 1. 1 lot CARPETING OF COMMUNITY BUILDING; per specifications G1TY OF BAYTOWIV BID T,4BULATION ,: arpet Town, Inc. Carter's A -1 Home Im rove u+vr7 ExrENOEO uNlr ExrENDED urvrT x ENO D $3,329.15 $4,505.66 $4,200.00 OPTION I Deduct for allowance to ( -0 -) ($187.50) ( -0 -) w install 8 -5, Monday- Friday +� OPTION II m � Deduct for payment of 80% of bid price upon delivery. ( -0) (200.16) (210.00) $3,329.15 $4,118.00 3,990.00 Delivery A.R.O. 30 da s 15 day 20 da s 2X l0 .D. �� t �� GROSS TOTAL LESS DISC. - NET TOTa L Fl_. tVFRY NDEO � UNIT � EXTENDED TITLE ANNUAL GARBAGE [iAG CONTRACT B1D� 81a -6o DATE �� ,� � 9s1 — �ITEMI QTY j DESCRIPTION a� U cd ANNUAL GARBAGE BAG CONTRACT; per specifications 1. Approx. Garbage Bags 1,000,000 each • Delivery A.R.O. GROSS TOTAL LESS DISC. NET IOTA L I� rvFRY GITY OF BAYTOI�VIV B!D TABULATION • ,. - Transa� °rent Produ is Bem' C ' UNI7 EXTENOEO UNIT EXTENDED UNIT X ENO 0 UNIT EXTEND D UNIT EXT NDED PRICE _ .06539 $65,390.0 .06895 $68,950.00 $.7266 $72,660.0 $.08154 $81,540.0 0 -30 d ys 30 day 7 -14 d ys 7 -14 da s rites ubject to Prices firm for Prices firm for eview f not 90 da s one lj year ccepte by 5/8/81 GITY OF BAYTOWIV TITLE���"'?�R°�- �s-'"' P�1PFR r�NTRACT B�� TABULATION 814 -61 `' 810 oaTE� �r i 1 30 , 1881 TE�V1 Q ANNUAL DATA PROCESSING PAPER CONTRACT; per specifications .,._� 100 M 1 part, 14 4/8 x 11, 20 lb. $ 8.58 $858.00 510.26 $1,026.00 $ 9.36 $ 936.00 512.87 $1,287.00 2. ` 20 M 2 part, 14 7/8 x il, 15 lb. 18.92 378.40 20.Ob 401.20 20.12 402.`0 29.23 584.60 3• � 20 M 3 part, 14 7/8 x 11, 15 lb. 29.92 598.40 31.09 621.80 33 -00 660.00 45.02 900.40 4. 75 M 4 part, 14 7/8 x 11, 15 lb. 42.44 3,183.00 41.70 3,127.50 44.97 3,369.00 51.69 3,876.75 - S. 20 M l part, 9 1/2 x 11, 20 lb. 7.2b 145.20 7.05 141.00 8.62 - 172.40 10.34 206.80 � TOTAL BID 5,163.00 55,317.50 55,539.80 56,555.55 .� cUa DELIVERY A.R.O. 4 days 5 days 3-7 days 4 -6 wee s � i GROSS TOTAL LESS DISC. NET TOTA L '= t..rvERY � .. __ _�...�.._....�.__��. DATA DOCUMENTS BURROUGHS CORP. RE UNtT r� X NO uNlT EXTENDED UNlT EX TY DESCRIPTION UNl7 EXTENDED urvlT pCTENDEO TE�V1 Q ANNUAL DATA PROCESSING PAPER CONTRACT; per specifications .,._� 100 M 1 part, 14 4/8 x 11, 20 lb. $ 8.58 $858.00 510.26 $1,026.00 $ 9.36 $ 936.00 512.87 $1,287.00 2. ` 20 M 2 part, 14 7/8 x il, 15 lb. 18.92 378.40 20.Ob 401.20 20.12 402.`0 29.23 584.60 3• � 20 M 3 part, 14 7/8 x 11, 15 lb. 29.92 598.40 31.09 621.80 33 -00 660.00 45.02 900.40 4. 75 M 4 part, 14 7/8 x 11, 15 lb. 42.44 3,183.00 41.70 3,127.50 44.97 3,369.00 51.69 3,876.75 - S. 20 M l part, 9 1/2 x 11, 20 lb. 7.2b 145.20 7.05 141.00 8.62 - 172.40 10.34 206.80 � TOTAL BID 5,163.00 55,317.50 55,539.80 56,555.55 .� cUa DELIVERY A.R.O. 4 days 5 days 3-7 days 4 -6 wee s � i GROSS TOTAL LESS DISC. NET TOTA L '= t..rvERY � .. __ _�...�.._....�.__��. TITLE�.n.�Cl_OSED CIR,.,. CULT VIDEQ EOUIPME�N,T„® sID� a..�814- 53��ee DA7" f'. April 2 i , 1981 TEM QTY DESCRIPT101V CLOSEO CIRCUIT VIDEO EQUIPMENT per Specifications • 1 1 system CCTV SYSTEM INSTALLED Installation A.R.O. x Warranty � Delivery A.R.O. E U cd � Eight (� companies were mailed bids and all were contacted by phone � prior to bid opening �_ GROSS TOTaL LESS DISC. NET TO7a L CITY ol= saYTov�� el0 rasv�ar�oN ,. Commercial Citadel Industries UNIT EXTENDED UNIT EXTENDED >RICE �4,Ob9.00 $3,605.00 � days 10 days 12 month Parts -12 months Labor - -- 90 days 21 days 10 days NO �r UNIT I EX rrTL E: wHEEI 8ALANCER B 10 � —� 'sue. —�- �ATE� MaY 6 , 1981 -- TEM QTY DESCR1PT101V 1 1 each WHEEL BALANCER; per specificati Make /Model f Delivery A.R.O. E Two (2) companies submitted a � "No -Bid" � � f GROSS TOTAL LESS DISC. 1VET IOTA L �, r�I�RY -' CITY OF BAYTO�f�I B10 TABULATIOtV �� Autoscan Equi ment William A. Kail Co. J.V. E ui men X�` ND UN,r EXTENDED' L1N,r EXTENDED UN,r R 83,232.58 53,675.00 53,695.00 FMC 5800 Bishman 90 Autotr 8000 3 days 15-30 d ys 10 -20 ys 1% 10 C.D. l� l0 C.D. ,r EXTEND � � uN, r�z TITLE: BACKHOE TRAILER DAVE; Apri 1 21 , 1981 _ __ �TEMI QTY � DESCRlPTlON GROSS TOTAL _ LESS 0lSC. NET IOTA L !- (,.!VERY GITY O F BAYT0�4li� B10 TABULATION • ti. H co E ui ment Inc. Case Power li E ui men UNIT EXTENDED UNIT E?CTENOEO UNI PRICE $4,585.00 56,663.00 Kalyn LP 18 Pan Eager Be ver lOHD6 60 days 3 weeks NO D UNf 7 EXTENOEO � w- 'I+nMt ��il.. w���l��.g '• r.ii= Jf Z �:a� 1 1 cash BACKHOE TRAILER;- per Specifications Make /Model Delivery A.R.O. +� Thirteen (13} companies were � a� mailed bid invitations and all � were contacted by telephone prior to the bid opening. +' Two companies submitted "No- Bids ". GROSS TOTAL _ LESS 0lSC. NET IOTA L !- (,.!VERY GITY O F BAYT0�4li� B10 TABULATION • ti. H co E ui ment Inc. Case Power li E ui men UNIT EXTENDED UNIT E?CTENOEO UNI PRICE $4,585.00 56,663.00 Kalyn LP 18 Pan Eager Be ver lOHD6 60 days 3 weeks NO D UNf 7 EXTENOEO � w- 'I+nMt ��il.. w���l��.g '• r.ii= Jf Z �:a� a� U �+-� 7'I �E�'iinhi i it.�tion I't•o'cct . -S1D� D��TE� _ ":,,- �, , 1 �lS 1 �' ,� (ITEM QT`S � DESCRIPTION CITY OF BAYTOUVlV B!D TA BULAT! ON Stecl.e Construction C .i Painti� S ectorum_Tntcr. Tiastside Const. Ed Shook UNIT EXTENDED UNIT_ EXTENDED UNlT�Ek�'ENDED UNIT EXTENO 0 nDN ^T�E 1 Rehabilitation Project 11S0 -03 -02 $9,9G5.00 1217 Ash 1 Rehabilitation Project #80 -01 -01 $G, 27.1, 00 1804 W. Humble � 1 * 1,otocst Biddcr GROSS TOTAL LESS DISC. NET IOTA L *'$G;73G.77 $7,547.75 $9,245.00 $8,995.00 $5,7i0.77 � I $6,030.00 � I$7,580.00 � I$5,699.00 � .. .....• .. . __ .. -- - - -- - �• --- -------- ._. -r-_ __.._�._._.. _.�..._...- ....._. - -• -- - � _ �.._ ... r. y A i mrn� <��� Moo r z, r I.-+ o� :ro O N rr O H O fD n n �s co Go 0 a w N n :2 ? V CA D+ 4s a I rt � r• O n C1 ci v V tJ� 0 Q) M CTT O G C-1 3 in O OC]:i r C) Co Q D� C 00 rD �O O � z�