Loading...
1980 09 25 CC Minutes00925 -1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN September 25, 1980 The City Council of the City of Baytown, Texas, met in regular session on Thursday, September 25, 1980, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the Baytown City Hall with the following members in attendance: Jimmy Johnson Perry M. Simmons *Mary E. Wilbanks Allen Cannon Emmett 0. Hutto Fritz Lanham Dan Savage Randy Strong Eileen P. Hall Absent: Fred T. Philips Eileen Caffey Councilman Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Mayor City Manager Assistant City Manager City Attorney City Clerk Councilman Councilwoman The meeting was called to order and the invocation was offered by Mayor Hutto. Minutes Councilman Johnson moved to approve the minutes of the regular and special meetings held on September 11, 1980. Council- man Simmons seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Johnson, Simmons and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None Pc-t i t i nnc None. City Manager's Report Council had been furnished a copy of Houston Lighting and Power Company's statement of cost comparison for the billing month of October, 1980. The statement reflected a reduction of almost $4.00 in the bill of a customer using 2,000 KWH. Council had also been furnished a letter from Airs. Lurline Wilson regarding some of the needs of the community. Representatives of the Clean City Commission visited with Mrs. Wilson and got some specifics from her. Representatives of the Clean City Commission were able to remedy ten of the problems Mrs. Wilson listed. *Councilwoman Wilbanks present. Drainage - Most of the drainage projects approved by Council for the 1979 -80 fiscal year have been completed. After the end of the fiscal year, a complete report will be given concerning drainage. Presently, the Airhart Drive project is approximately 98% complete and the Travis Street Project has been completed. 00925 -2 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - September 25, 1980 Harris County Flood Control District continues to work in the Baytown area and additional crossings have been installed underneath the flood control district's crossing of Kilgore Road. Barkuloo Road Sanitary Sewer - This line is being jointly funded by the school district and the city to provide sewer service to the new Crockett Elementary School. Approximately 350 feet of line has been laid along the west side of Barkuloo Road. East District Sanitary Sewer - The contractors on the East District Sanitary Sewer contracts are making good progress. Approximately 720 feet of 8 -inch gravity sewer line has been completed along Raccoon Road south of Knight Lane and the lines and manholes have been tested. Almost 1500 feet of line has been laid along Raccoon Drive from Cary's Bayou to Knight Lane and east along Knight Lane. This section has also been tested. Approximately 1065 feet of 8 -inch line along Savell Drive and approximately 2600 feet of 24 -inch along Cary's Bayou from Raccoon Drive in a westerly direction to within about 800 feet of Hardin Road has been completed. The walls of the lift station are being formed and poured. Twelve -Inch Water Line Along Interstate 10 Between San Jacinto Mall and Thompson Road - This line has been completed with the exception of the tie in to Baytown Area Water Authority line; testing of that line is in progress. Park Street - Approximately 95% of the work has been completed on the storm sewer and about 95% of the concrete on the south side has been poured. Forms have been set on the north side between the bridge and Garth Road. The contractor has begun setting forms on the north side east of Garth Road. Within the past few days the contractor on that job has made good progress. The contractor expects to complete this job on schedule which should be early November. Community Development - Approximately 95% of the sidewalks and driveways have been poured on the Community Development Project and the contractor is setting forms. Mesquito Control - The City is being sprayed to control mesquitoes every week. From the calls being received, it appears the problem is no longer as serious as it had been. Recent rains have helped minimize the number of water breaks. Larger breaks have been repaired and crews are now able to repair the small breaks. All breaks should be repaired by the end of next week. Questions and Comments Regarding City Manager's Report In response to an inquiry from Mayor Hutto, Mr. Lanham explained that the decision of where to begin a project is usually left to the contractor. Mr. Lanham also stated that he would check with the Consulting Engineers concerning founda- tion on the Park Street project. With regard to Houston Lighting & Power Company, Randy Strong, City Attorney, explained that the Public Utilities Commission has granted the company an additional month to charge summer rates. Houston Lighting & Power is now allowed to charge summer rates from May through October. 00925 -3 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - September 25, 1980 Norman Dykes, City Engineer, stated in response to an inquiry from Council, that he had reviewed the county plans for completion of the Baker Road project. The plans are well done, but do require that Harris County Flood Control District enlarge the east fork of Goose Creek. Representative of Centennial Square Apartments Appeared Mr. Terry Ross, a partner in the Bicentennial Square Company, appeared to protest valuation of Centennial Square for 1980. Mr. Ross read a prepared statement afterwhich Mayor Hutto explained that under the City Charter, the City Council does not have the power to alter a decision of the Tax Equalization Board and the only appeal would be through district court. Ordinance - Establishing the Tax Rate for the 1980 -81 Fiscal Year Mayor Hutto recognized Lamar Kelley, representative of Baytown Taxpayers Association, who requested that Council consider estab- lishing a tax rate of $1.25 or less. He stated a tax rate of $1.35 or $1.30 would not be acceptable to the taxpayers association. In response to an inquiry from Council, Mr. Kelley stated that his group had gone over the budget and there are areas in the budget that could possibly require attention, but that group had elected not to discuss those areas publicly. Mayor Hutto introduced for the record statements from Council members Caffey and Philips which statements are attached to the minutes as Attachments A and B respectively. The Administration had developed alternatives which would provide $.05 or $.07 reductions in the proposed $1.35 tax rate. The alternatives, Case Nos. 1 - 4 were presented as follows: CASE 1 50 Reduction Cumulative Supplement Street Paving $ 125,000 1.658 Street Sweeper 63,000 .835 2.49 Reduction in fuel budget 30,000 .398 2.89 Delete replacement of brush truck 20,000 .265 3.16 Reduce Contingency 140,000 1.840 5.00 (Remaining Contingency $199,796) $ 378,000 CASE 2 50 Reduction Cumulative Supplement Street Paving $ 125,000 1.658 Street Sweeper 63,000 .835 2.49 Reduction in fuel budget 30,000 .398 2.89 Delete replacement of brush truck 20,000 .265 3.16 Lease purchase Gradall 92,000 1.220 4.38 Reduce Contingency 47,000 .620 5.00 (Remaining Contingency $292,796) $ 377,000 UU92b -4 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - September 25, 1980 CASE 3 70 Reduction Cumulative Supplement Street Paving $125,000 1.658 1.658 Street Sweeper 63,000 .835 2.49 Reduction in fuel budget 30,000 .398 2.89 Delete replacement of brush truck 20,000 .265 3.16 Lease purchase Gradall 92,000 1.220 4.36 Reduce Contingency 198,990 2.640 7.00 (Remaining Contingency $140,806) $528,990 CASE 4 70 Reduction Cumulative Supplement Street Paving $125,000 1.658 Street Sweeper 63,000 .835 2.49 Reduction in fuel budget 30,000 .398 2.89 Delete replacement of brush truck 20,000 .265 3.16 Delete replacement of Gradall 122,000 1.618 4.78 Reduce Contingency 167,332 2.220 7.00 (Remaining Contingency $172,458) $527,332 In the discussion of the four alternatives, Mr. Lanham pointed out that in all instances fuel costs were reduced to $1.20 per gallon and that the contingency had also been reduced in each case to varying degrees. He stated that these were just a few alternatives that Council could consider. Perhaps, Council would have other alternatives. Mayor Hutto expressed concern that in each case contingency would be reduced. Also, he felt the gradall to be necessary to maintain the City's drainage program. Councilman Cannon pointed out that the surplus estimate for the 1979 -80 fiscal year is $878,613. For the 1978 -79 budget, the surplus was $740,000. He commended the Administration for an excellent job in managing the city's funds, but at the same time questioned the process that would result in this amount of surplus. He emphasized that there would be increases in fees for a number of city services and that citizens are having difficulties meeting financial obligations. He inquired if setting a $1.28 tax rate would mean that Council would be approving the budget as proposed minus Case No. 4. Mr. Lanham responded in the affirmative and pointed out that in 1978 the surplus was $1,181,000, which amount has declined each year. Councilman Cannon felt that if the tax rate were lowered, Council would then need to consider very carefully before expending funds not budgeted during the fiscal year. He felt that Council could lower the rate with a forewarning that it may be necessary to increase the rate the following year. Mayor Hutto proposed that Council consider $.07 reduction from the proposed $1.35 since the rate proposed by the tax department, $1.13 plus 130o inflation equals $1.28. He felt since values had been increased to 1977 figures, this would provide necessary funds to operate the city and provide a satisfactory level of service. 00925 -5 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - September 25, 1980 Councilman Cannon stated that the City needed to devise meth- ods to offset inflation, such as bidding smaller vehicles and planning work schedules so that more people can ride per vehicle. However, he emphasized that he would want to provide the pay packet that had been discussed. He felt the employees are entitled to this increase. Mayor Hutto mentioned that with regard to inflation, in many instances there are few things that can actually be done and the 13% increase to employees will not actually provide an increase, but only allow the employees to "break even." Mr. Lanham reviewed several of the budget accounts for Council. Afterwhich, Councilman Simmons stated that it has been his experi- ence that in the budget process, the Administration is usually conservative in estimating revenues and liberal in estimating expenditures which usually provides some cushion. There is no control over revenues; however, expenditures can be controlled by waiting to make the expenditure or eliminating the expenditure completely. Therefore, he felt the proposed tax rate of $1.35 could be reduced without causing problems. Mayor Hutto inquired if Council had a figure besides the proposed $1.35 rate to discuss. Mayor Hutto had suggested $1.28 and Council members Philips and Caffey had recommended $1.32 and $1.30 respectively. Councilman Cannon stated that he had determined before attending the meeting that $1.25 would be a reasonable tax rate. He had reached this determination by taking $1.13, last year's rate, and adding an inflation factor of 10 %. He mentioned that in the Administration's alternatives, Council could find $.07 which would mean Council would need to find further reductions to equal the $225,000. This could mean a crunch toward the end of the budget year, but again there are a number of variables which may produce more revenue or less expense. Therefore, Councilman Cannon moved to establish a tax rate of $1.25. Mayor Hutto inquired if Councilman Cannon had considered where the $225,000 would be derived? Councilman Cannon responded Council would need to reconsider each departmental budget. He was not suggesting that the contin- gency be lower further than Case No. 4 proposed. The Administration could wait 3 - 4 months to make certain expenditures. Councilman Simmons stated that he had been against the pro- posed $1.35 rate from the beginning, but by the same token with the unpredictables in fuel cost, he would think the better part of discretion would be to entertain Case No. 3, providing a $.07 reduction. Mayor Hutto pointed out that Council had two statements from absent Council members recommending $1.32 and $1.30. Also, he stated that as a prudent businessman he could not support $1.25. He also pointed out that the surplus is considered very important to the bond rating firms. Councilman Cannon's motion died for lack of second. Councilman Johnson explained that he too desired to establish a tax rate which would be the lowest possible rate, but he would prefer to know where the $225,000 would be derived. Therefore, Councilman Johnson moved that $1.28 be established as the tax rate as indicated in Case No. 3 of the Administration's alternatives. Councilman Simmons seconded the motion. 00925 -6 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - September 25, 1980 The City Attorney was allowed time to make appropriate changes in the ordinance. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 2971 AN ORDINANCE FIXING THE RATE AND TAX LEVY FOR THE CITY OF BAYTOWN FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1981, UPON ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY IN SAID CITY OF BAYTOWN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS AND THE CHARTER PROVISIONS AND ORDINANCES OF SAID CITY; AND REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT THEREWITH. Ordinance - Adopting 1980 -81 Budget for City of Baytown Mr. Lanham explained that the budget which Council had been given was based on changes through August. The $60,000 that resulted from the Board of Equalization report was not included. The Administration had developed a summary of 1980 -81 proposed budget which included the $60,000 figure based on $1.35 tax rate. With the adjustment in the tax rate, the general fund figure, $14,834,805 was reduced by $528,990 for a figure of $14,305,815 to be included in the ordinance under Section 2, General Fund. Councilman Simmons moved for the adoption of the ordinance, subject to the reduction; Councilwoman Wilbanks seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 2972 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR THE ENSUING FISCAL YEAR, BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 1980, AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1981, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CHARTER AND ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION OF TIiIS ORDINANCE. Ordinance - Adopting City of Baytown Revenue Sharing Budget for 1980 -81 Mr. Lanham explained that at the present there was no confirmation that the revenue sharing legislation had been finalized; therefore, Council would be acting with the under- standing that Council action is contingent upon legislative action. Also, the Administration would not proceed with any revenue sharing expenditures until such authorization was received. The Administration recommended approval of the $500,000 for the purposes outlined in recommendations. The major portion of the $500,000 would be utilized toward matching funds for the West District Treatment Plant. 00925 -7 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - September 25, 1980 Councilwoman Wilbanks moved for the adoption of the ordinance; Councilman Johnson seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 2973 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN TO APPROPRIATE FIVE HUDNRED THOUSAND AND N01100 ($500,000) DOLLARS FROM THE UNAPPROPRIATED TWELFTH ENTITLEMENT PERIOD FUNDS OF GENERAL REVENUE SHARING, 1981, TO THE FOLLOWING BUDGET ACCOUNTS: 9020, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; 9060, LIBRARY; 9070, SOCIAL SERVICES; AND 9080, FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION; DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO FILE AND GIVE NOTICE OF THE AVAIL- ABILITY OF THE ADOPTED BUDGET; AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Approval of Baytown Area Water Authority Budget for 1980 -81 This is the budget that has been reviewed and approved by the Baytown Area Water Authority Board. The figures are based on estimated treatment of 7,600,000 gallons of water per day. If BAWA were to treat more water, the cost of treat- ment would increase accordingly, but so would revenues since revenue projections are also based on 7,600,000. Based on City of Baytown consumption, there should be demand for at least the 7,600,000. The Administration recommended approval of the Baytown Area Water Authority Budget for 1980 -81. Councilman Simmons moved to approve the 1980 -81 Budget for the Baytown Area Water Authority; Councilwoman Wilbanks seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None Ordinance - Amending Chapter 31, "Utilities," to Provide for Increase in Sewer Service Rates and Tapping Fees for Water and Sewer Service Passage of this ordinance would increase the sewer rates from the present rate of $3.50 for the first 3,000 gallons and $.40 per 1,000 gallons in excess of 3,000 to $4.50 for the first 2,000 gallons and $.85 for all service over the minimum. For residential customers a cap will be set at 10,000 gallons. For service over 10,000 gallons for residential customers, there will be no charge. The Administration has reviewed the tapping fees and a change is indicated. The recommendation is to go from $215 to $250 for a three - quarter inch water tap; from $275 to $300 for a one inch water tap and from $140 to $175 for a four inch sewer tap. All taps larger than these residential taps will be made at cost. The Administration recommended approval of the ordinance. In response to a question from the audience, Mayor Hutto explained that Council realizes the increase in water is high, but there are bonds to be retired and the cost of raw water to 00925 -8 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - September 25, 1980 consider. With regard to the sewer rate, Council had requested a cap be placed at 10,000 gallons because Council felt anything over 10,000 gallons would be used to water lawns, wash autos, etc. Mr. Lanham explained that in past years, the water fund has been subsidizing the sewer fund to some degree and this would change that and put the sewer system on a self - supporting basis. Councilman Simmons moved to adopt the ordinance; Councilwoman Wilbanks seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 2974 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 31, "UTILITIES," OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN BY AMENDING SECTION 31 -55, WATER TAPPING FEES; AMENDING SECTION 31- 65, SEWER SERVICE CHARGE; AMENDING SECTION 31 -67, SEWER TAPPING FEES; PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE; CONTAINING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Ordinance - Amending Chapter 14, "Garbage, Trash and Brush," to Provide an Increased Charge for Solid Waste Collection The present rate is $4.50 per month for normal residential service and $2.25 per month for senior citizen service. The proposal is to increase each of these rates by $1.00 per month. This rate will cover the cost of garbage collection twice weekly, but will not cover the cost of trash and heavy items collection. That would continue to be subsized from other city revenues. The Administration recommended approval of the ordi- nance. Councilman Johnson moved for adoption of the ordinance; Councilman Simmons seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 2975 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 14, "GARBAGE, TRASH, AND BRUSH," OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN SETTING THE CHARGE FOR COLLECTION; PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE; CONTAINING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. K Ordinance - Approving a Contract with Lake Municipal Utility District to Provide Sanitary Sewer Service The Council has made certain agreements with the developers of Lake Municipal Utility District which this contract will implement. The contract provides that Lake Municipal Utility District will pay the City of Baytown $525,000 as a capital charge for sewer plant capacity. The agreement was that Lake Municipal Utility District's rates will be the same as that of customers within the city limits and that is what this contract provides. The district will be responsible for building the 00925 -9 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - September 25, 1980 system and transmission line to the city subject to the city approval of plans and specifications and city inspection of the work. A flow device must be installed to meter and record the amount of sewerage flowing into the city's system. The system will be owned by the district, but the district must comply with city regulations and there is a very stiff penalty for infiltration. Article V speaks to scheduled types of wastes that the city will accept. There is a table attached to the contract which shows that by 1986 the average volume expected to be delivered to the city is 500,000 gallons per day. The capital buy -in charge as determined by Langford Engineering is $1.04 per thousand gallons for plant expansion; therefore, by multiplying the $1.04 by 500,000 results in the capital buy -in. The remainder of the contract speaks to payment and the right of the city to inspect the district's books. The district will be billing its customers and paying the city on a lump sum basis. The Administration recommended approval of the ordinance. Councilman Cannon moved for adoption of the ordinance; Councilman Johnson seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 2976 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK OF THE CITY TO EXECUTE AND ATTEST TO A WASTEWATER DISPOSAL CONTRACT WITH LAKE MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Ordinance - Awarding Bid for Depository Contract Specifications were changed and rebid. On second bidding, two bids Bank and Trust submitted .4% below Texas National Bank submitted .895% Rate. The bid of Citizens Bank and Administration recommended approval the depository contract was were received. Citizens the current Treasury Bill Rate. below the current Treasury Bill Trust is the high bid. The of the ordinance. Councilman Simmons moved to adopt the ordinance; Councilman Cannon seconded the motion. In response to an inquiry from Council, Mr. Lanham explained that the big change in the contract was the provision that the city would be able to do some investing on its own. The contract ambiguity discussed at the last meeting was changed in an effort to clarify that both parties have the right to cancel the contract for cause. With regard to the pledges that can be accepted, Mr. Strong stated that the state law specifies acceptable securities and the contract follows that except there is a provision that on some federal agencies, the securities be unconditionally guaranteed. Also, any bonds of another governmental entity which are used as collataral must be "A" rated or better. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None 00925 -10 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - September 25, 1980 ORDINANCE NO. 2977 AN ORDINANCE SELECTING A CITY DEPOSITORY; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AND ATTEST TO A CONTRACT WITH THE SELECTED DEPOSITORY; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Ordinance - Awarding Bid for Term Life, Accidental Death and Dismemberment and Medical Insurance for City Employees Six bids were received on September 24, 1980, for term life, accidental death and dismemberment and medical insurance for city employees. Bids were taken on two group medical plans. Plan A is based on the current city medical plan with minor modifications. Plan B is based on specifications developed by the Texas Municipal League's Insurance Trust Fund. Plan A provides for a $200 deductible, average semi - private room rate, $1,000 first dollar coverage with 80% co- insurance for the next $4,000 and 100% coverage over $5,000. Plan B provides for $100 deductible, average semi - private room rate, and 80% co- insurance for the first $2,500 with 100% coverage over $2,500. Plan A provides better coverage on smaller claims, while Plan B provides more coverage on larger claims. The low bid for group medical insurance on Plan B was submitted by the Texas Municipal League's Insurance Trust Fund. The rates quoted for employee medical insurance are identical with the current rates -- $38.34 for employee coverage, $25.42 for child coverage, $65.19 for spouse coverage, and $88.21 for family coverage. The Texas Municipal League Insurance Trust Fund Plan is currently insured by Philadelphia Life Insurance Company and reinsured and administered by the Prudential Insurance Company of Austin. The City's annual cost for medical coverage for 521 employees will be $239,701.68. Currently, 161 employees have child, spouse, or family coverage. Employees with dependent insurance will pay $115,695. The total cost of group medical insurance at present enrollment will be $355,396.68. Mutual of New York submitted the low bid on Plan B at a total cost of $381,489. Mutual of New York also submitted the low bid on Plan A at a total cost of $426,484.92. Group Life Insurance is provided as part of the employee group coverage package. Currently, the city provides employees with $5,000 coverage and retirees with $3,000 coverage. Bids were taken on this plan and two others. One would provide only $3,000 coverage and the other for full salary up to $25,000. Since the Administration has recommended modifying the City's Texas Municipal Retirement System Plan by adding both 10 year vesting and increased death benefits, it is probably best to stay with the present life insurance plan. The total city cost for this coverage is $16,144.92. Council expressed some concern there was no employee input prior to advertising for bids; however, Councilman Cannon noted that in a situation where many individuals are affected, that it would be difficult to please everyone. He stated that this appeared to be a good plan with no increase in cost to the employees. 00925 -11 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - September 25, 1980 Mr. Savage pointed out that the plan itself was designed by Municipal League Trust Fund Board composed of persons who rep- resent cities throughout the state and the plan is designed for cities which is an important consideration. Councilman Johnson moved for adoption of the ordinance; Councilman Cannon seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 2978 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS, ACCEPTING THE BID OF TEXAS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE INSUR- ANCE TRUST FUND FOR A GROUP INSURANCE POLICY PROVIDING FOR LIFE INSURANCE, MAJOR MEDICAL BENEFITS, AND BASIC MEDICAL BENEFITS FOR THE CITY OF BAYTOWN EMPLOYEES; AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AND ATTEST TO A CONTRACT WITH TEXAS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE INSURANCE TRUST FUND; DIRECTING PAYMENTS OF PREMIUMS PURSUANT TO THE TERMS OF SAID CONTRACT; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. For tabulation, see Attachment "C." Ordinance - Authorizing Execution of a Facilities Management Contract with B. H. Greer d /b /a Computer Consulting Services For the last three years, the City has had a contract with Bob Greer of Computer Consulting Services to provide technical service for data processing operations. What the Administration is proposing is to renew that contract. The original contract called for an annual payment of $18,000 which provided for 1,000 hours of work at a rate of $18.00 per hour. That contract was signed in September, 1977. The contract that the Administration is proposing is a three -year contract, but under the terms of this contract each year, the city would specify the basic number of hours that Mr. Greer and his employees would be working. In the 1980 -81 fiscal year, the recommendation is that he be employed to work 1,500 hours and that during that fiscal year, he be guaranteed a minimum of $30,000; that an hourly rate be established for him at the rate of $25.00 per hour, systems analyst at the rate of $20.00 per hour and programmers at a rate of $18.00 per hour. In the event he is required to work more than the 1,500 hours specified, the rates will be changed to $30.00 per hour for his time, $25.00 per hour for systems analyst, and $20.00 per hour for programmers. In subsequent years, the Administration would like to set the minimum hours at no less than 1,000 hours per year, but each year prior to beginning of the fiscal year, a rate would be established. Also, there is a provision that Mr. Greer's salary and that of his employees will be-negotiable up to, but not to exceed, the cost of living increase granted city employees. The contract has a clause that either party may cancel the contract, provided that 60 days written notice is given. The contract is not assignable. There is an attachment to the contract entitled, "Scope of Services," which basically makes Mr. Greer responsible for the technical aspects of the city's data processing operations -- existing systems, as well as new systems. The city has the respon- sibility to establish priorities and to supervise and operate the production operations of the department and its personnel -- computer operators and keypunch operators. 00925 -12 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - September 25, 1980 In response to questions from Council, Mr. Savage explained that Mr. Greer has been involved with data processing since 1966 or 1967, and became involved with the City of Baytown through Honeywell when the city was in desperate need of a programmer. The City had hired Mr. Greer on a temporary basis until such time that a full -time programmer could be retained. At that time, the City was unable to get a person with the proper back- ground to operate the City's data processing system; therefore, Mr. Greer was offered the data process consulting contract. Mr. Savage likened Mr. Greer to an engineering consultant who has expertise at a greater level than the City would be able to afford on a full -time basis. A contract such as this gives the City continuity which the City would not be able to maintain by competing on the data processing market. Mr. Greer is responsible to Mr. Savage who makes all scheduling decisions. Mr. Savage felt that the best procedure at this point would be to develop a procedure to consolidate the data processing operation, bring existing system up to current technology and attempt to realize some economics. A work plan has been developed and presented to the City Manager. During this fiscal year, Mr. Savage would like to develop a data processing review committee to help establish plans and set priorities in terms of future develop- ment. With regard to recommendations made by the auditors, Mr. Savage explained that some of the cash receipt programs are operational, but not fully implemented. With regard to verifying, Mr. Savage felt that the edits that the program produces are designed to do that. Mr. Greer is available to the City by phone and in many instances problems are resolved by phone. If the problem cannot be resolved by phone, Mr. Greer makes an on -site inspection. Over the three years of the present contract, this has not been a real problem. Mr. Greer possesses the expertise necessary and provides necessary continuity to move into an on -line system. Councilman Cannon stated that at some point, he felt that the City would need to look at having a full -time person on the City's payroll to handle the data processing program. Councilman Cannon moved to adopt the ordinance; Councilwoman Wilbanks seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 2979 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK OF THE CITY TO EXECUTE AND ATTEST TO A FACILITIES MANAGE- MENT CONTRACT WITH B. H. GREER, d /b /a COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICES, FOR DATA PROCESSING SERVICES AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. 00925 -13 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - September 25, 1980 Ordinance - Authorizing Execution of a Contract with Baytown Area Water Authority for Personnel Services Council approved the City of Baytown budget for the 1980 -81 fiscal year which included employee positions for staffing of the water treatment plant. It had been decided some time ago that rather than the Authority hiring its employees, the City would hire and supervise the employees and the Authority would reimburse the City for the actual expense of providing the service. The contract provides that the City will provide a plant manager, operators, etc. to operate and maintain the water treatment plant. BAWA will pay the City the actual expense incurred to furnish employees, that is salary, benefits, licensing, etc. The Baytown Area Water Authority Board has approved the contract; the Administration concurred. Councilman Simmons moved for approval of the ordinance; Councilman Johnson seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 2980 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN TO EXECUTE AND ATTEST TO A CONTRACT WITH THE BAYTOWN AREA WATER AUTHORITY (BAWA) FOR PERSONNEL SERVICES TO BE FURNISHED BY THE CITY OF BAY - TOWN TO BAWA TO MAINTAIN AND OPERATE ITS PLANT. Ordinance - Authorizing Execution of Contract with Baytown Area Water Authority Establishing Rate for Sale of Water to the City of Baytown When the contract election was held in 1977, what was actually being voted on was a contract between the Baytown Area Water Author- ity and the City of Baytown which provides that the Authority will build and operate a water treatment plant and transmission system. The City of Baytown will be financially responsible to pay to the Authority funds to pay the interest and principal on the bonds and to operate the plant. It is necessary to have a supplemental contract to set forth the rate that the Authority is authorized to charge. Based on the budget recently approved and based on the sale of 7,600,000 gallons of water per day, that charge must be $.97 per thousand gallons. In dealing with the customers other than the City of Baytown, $1.00 is being used as a basis for negotiation. If more than 7,600,000 gallons are sold, it may be possible to reduce this rate. The original contract makes this provision. The Baytown Area Water Authority Board has approved this contract; the Administration concurred. Councilman Cannon moved for adoption of the ordinance; Councilman Johnson seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None 00925 -14 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - September 25, 1980 ORDINANCE NO. 2981 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN TO EXECUTE AND ATTEST TO A CONTRACT WITH THE BAYTOWN AREA WATER AUTHORITY (BAWA) ESTABLISHING THE RATE FOR SALE OF WATER TO THE CITY OF BAYTOWN. Ordinance - Approving Final Payment for the 1980 Street Improve- ment Program Brown and Root, Inc. has completed the work. The total cost of the contract, including two change orders is $417,183.44 which is an underrun of $79.20. The major change order was the change in plans for Lobit Street. The Administration recommended approval of the ordinance. Councilwoman Wilbanks moved for adoption of the ordinance; Councilman Cannon seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 2982 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND ACCEPTING CONSTRUCTION OF THE 1980 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BY BROWN & ROOT, INC.; FINDING THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACT; ACCEPTING THE CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE; AUTHORIZING THE FINAL PAYMENT TO THE SAID BROWN & ROOT, INC.; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Ordinance - Approving Final Payment for 1980 Sanitary Sewer Sliplining Program This work has been completed with an overrun of $300 bringing the final payment to $18,168. The Administration recommended approval of the ordinance. Councilman Cannon moved for adoption of the ordinance; Councilwoman Wilbanks seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 2983 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND ACCEPTING CONSTRUCTION OF THE 1980 SANITARY SEWER SLIPLINING PROGRAM BY SHUR -FLO, INC.; FINDING THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACT; ACCEPTING THE CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE; AUTHORIZING THE FINAL PAYMENT TO THE SAID SHUR -FLO, INC.; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. 00925 -15 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - September 25, 1980 Ordinance - Approving Final Payment for Twelve -Inch Water Main to Gentry Junior School This is the line that is to be jointly funded by the school district and the City. Final payment is $13,131.70. The Administration recommended approval of the ordinance. Councilman Johnson moved for adoption of the ordinance; Councilman Cannon seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 2984 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND ACCEPTING CONSTRUCTION OF A WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM BY JAHO, INC.; FINDING THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACT; ACCEPTING THE CONSULTING ENGINEERS' CERTIFICATE OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE; AUTHORIZING THE FINAL PAYMENT TO THE SAID JAHO, INC.; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Consider Proposed Resolution - Establishing Rules and Procedure for Conduct of Council Meetings Since all Council members were not in attendance, this item was passed. Resolution No. 746 - Authorizing the Administration to Make Grant Application for Senior Citizens Taxicab Program The Houston - Harris County Area Agency on Aging has changed its fiscal year to coincide with the federal fiscal year. Therefore, requests for funds will be limited to a nine -month period, January 1 to September 30, 1981. The Administration would like authorization to submit another grant application for continuation of the senior citizens taxicab program. Currently, approximately 1100 rides per month are being provided. The average cost per ride is about $1.65 and there are about 540 people who are enrolled in this program. The City would be applying for $17,280 in federal funds which will be matched with $11,520 local funds for a 60 -40 match. The Admin- istration recommended approval of the resolution. Councilwoman Wilbanks moved for adoption of the resolution; Councilman Johnson seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None RESOLUTION NO. 746 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN TO MAKE APPLICATION TO THE HOUSTON- HARRIS COUNTY AREA AGENCY ON AGING FOR GRANT FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF SEVENTEEN THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED EIGHTY AND N01100 ($17,280.00) DOLLARS FOR THE CITY OF BAYTOWN SENIOR CITIZENS' TAXICAB PROGRAM. 00925 -16 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - September 25, 1980 Ordinance - Approving Stipulation Agreement Concerning Proposed Rural Rate Increase for Houston Lighting and Power Company Council authorized the Administration to participate in the rural rate case regarding Houston Lighting and Power Company request for rate increase. Prior to the hearing, several of the parties involved, in an effort to eliminate some of the time and effort that goes into a rate hearing, worked out a stipulation agreement as to a proposed rate increase. That has been presented as part of the packet to the Public Utilities Commission. The stipulation would give-Houston Lighting and Power Company a rate increase of approximately $134,000,000. Houston Lighting and Power had requested in their rate packet $214,000,000. The City of Houston hired the firm of Touche, Ross to study Houston Lighting and Power's request and make a recommendation. Touche, Ross's recommendation is $121,000,000. The City of Baytown did not participate with Touche, Ross in that, but the City has used that firm in the past. The stipulation which was agreed to was fairly close to what the City of Houston's experts had recommended and it was in fact approximately $1,000,000 under what the Public Utilities Staff had recommended. In light of the fact that in past cases, Public Utilities Commission has usually accepted the staff recommendation or just above that recommendation, the stipulation had the effect of lowering the increase as to residential rates as opposed to what Houston Lighting and Power had originally requested. In the opinion of the City Attorney, the stipulation was reasonable. Under the stipulation, the total increase for residential customers would be 9.6 %. The company had requested a little above 14% originally. With regard to some of the newspaper stories which state that the stipulation agreement represents 18% increase, it does represent 18% increase if you look at the base rate only and do not count fuel costs. Using the same comparison and looking at Houston Lighting and Power's original request, the original request for base rate was 28 %. Therefore, the stipulation agreement is a fairly modest increase. The stipulation also raised the return differential somewhat. The return differential would be .81 from .70. The Public Utilities Commission staff had recommended .83. The City Attorney did not have an opportunity to present this to the Council prior to this being agreed upon. All the parties agreed to the stipulation, but the City Attorney did state that the stipulation would need to be presented to City Council for final decision. Theoretically, the stipulation applies strictly to the rural case and is not binding on any municipality in its own rate making case. Therefore, when the City Council holds its hearing, the Council may set whatever rate it deems just. However, realistically, if the City Council agrees to this stipulation, when it comes time to hear the City case there is some obligation for the Council to abide by the stipulation, because in essence Council in agreeing to the stipulation, is saying that this is a correct amount for Houston Lighting and Power to receive. Therefore, if Council agrees to the stipulation and then later decides on a different rate, this would put the City in a difficult position when appealing to the Public Utilities Commission. Therefore, the City Attorney felt that if Council adopted the stipulation agreement, it would set the tone for what Council would be doing in the City's case. The stipulation agreement is what Houston Lighting and Power received in the rural case and because Baytown was an intervenor in that case, the Public Utilities Commission is expecting Baytown to either approve or disapprove the stipulation agreement. Councilman Simmons expressed the desire to make a decision on the stipulation agreement after a public hearing is held by the City of Baytown to allow time to hear from the citizens with regard to what posture the City should take. 00925 -17 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - September 25, 1980 The City Attorney explained that part of the reason that Houston Lighting and Power was willing to enter into this stipulation was that the rates will go into effect on October 1 for rural areas and the cities entering the stipulation are agreeing that they will hold their rate hearings as soon as possible where these same rates can take effect in the cities. Therefore, by the stipulation Houston Lighting and Power would be able to put their increase into effect a month or two earlier. Another provision of the stipulation is that persons using less than 500 kilowatt hours per month would pay at the winter rate even in the summer. For those persons, their bill would actually decrease. Mr. Schafer stated that 210 of their customers fall in this category. The City Attorney also pointed out for Council information that the franchise fee will be considered separately by the Public Utilities Commission and is not settled as part of the stipulation. This will be considered at a separate hearing before the Public Utilities Commission. One of the proposals is that a portion of the franchise rate will be allocated to all consumers and a portion will be allocated to municipal customers. At present, municipal consumers pay the entire franchise cost. In response to a question from Council regarding energy audits, Mr. Schafer explained that Houston Lighting and Power will be offering to residential customers a service by which Houston Lighting and Power would go into the home and perform an energy audit and make recommendations as to energy conservation, along with facts related to pay back in energy savings. As part of the National Energy Act, this is mandated. Originally, Houston Lighting and Power has estimated a charge of $25.00, but the National Energy Act specifies that the maximum to be charged for this service is $15.00. Houston Lighting and Power now estimates that the actual cost to perform this service is $75.00, but by law the maximum that can be charged for the service is $15.00; therefore, the remainder will be absorbed elsewhere. Mayor Hutto pointed out that it appeared that the cost to perform the service out weights the actual benefit. He felt that the individual could go to a private concern to perform this audit if he so desired and then other customers would not be paying for the audit. Mr. Schafer explained that the City of Houston chose not to endorse the Administration's recommendation regarding the stipulation. Therefore, Houston Lighting and Power did file an appeal of that ordinance and the Public Utilities Commission will hear that appeal on October 6. Historically, the Public Utilities Commission has provided interim rates based on the determination in the rural rate case. Council requested that the Administration place this item on the Council agenda for October 9, 1980 meeting, along with an item to hold a public hearing on the Houston Lighting and Power rate request at 7:00 p. m. in the Council Chamber. Mr. Lanham inquired if Council would like the Administration to contact Touche, Ross with regard to testifying at the public hearing concerning the rate increase? Council responded that the Administration could be in contact with Touche, Ross to be present if the charge for this service is within reason. uuy65 -16 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - September 25, 1980 Consider Request to Make Median Cut on North Main Street Near Briarcreek Subdivision The Planning Commission has given preliminary approval of the plat for Briarcreek Subdivision. The developer has requested to make a median cut on North Main Street. at Podea Boulevard. The Admin- istration recommended that the request be approved with the stipulation that the developer pay the cost of the median cut and that there also be a left -turn storage lane. The Administration recommended approval subject to the developer paying the cost of the median cut and left -turn storage lane. Councilman Johnson moved to accept the Administration's recommendation; Councilman Simmons seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Johnson, Simmons, Wilbanks and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None Recess and Adjourn The meeting was recessed into executive session to discuss personnel matters. When the open meeting reconvened, the Mayor announced that no business had been transacted. There being no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned. J Eileen P. Ha 1, City Clerk la ATTACHMENT "A." TO: HONORABLE PilAYOR HUTTO AND CITY COUNCIL 51EMBERS FROM: EILEEN CAFFEY, COUNCIL MEMBER SUBJECT: TAX RATE I WOULD LIKE TO GO ON RECORD AS BEING IN FAVOR OF CUTTING THE PRESENT TAX RATE OF $1.44 to $1.309 RATHER THAN GOING WITH THE PREVIOUSLY PROPOSED RATE OF $.1.35. THIS WOULD AMOUNT TO A 140 REDUCTION FROM LAST YEAR'S RATE, IT IS WITH DEEP REGRET THAT I AM NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THIS MOST IMPORTANT COUNCIL DIETING, AS AN OBLIGATION FROM OVER A YEAR AGO TAKES US OUT OF STATE. OTHERWISE, AS YOU WELL KNOB "J, I INOULD BE PRESENT. AFTER MUCH STUDY AND MANY INQUIRIES, I BELIEVE WE CAN STILL GIVE GOOD SERVICE TO OUR CITIZENS AT THIS RATE WITHOUT SACRIFICING OR CUTTING THE QUALITY OF SERVICE. AS AN EXAMPLE, SURELY NO ONE CAN BE AGAINST ADEQUATE LAW ENFORCEMENT. Al DEFINITELY NEED ADDTIONAL POLICE AND FIRE PROTECTION TO COVER THE GROWTH OF OUR CITY. ALSO, I DEFINITELY WOULD NOT WANT TO SEE A CUT -BACK ON THE DRAINAGE WORK AND STREET BUILDING AND REPAIR THAT HAS BEEN DONE THIS LAST YEAR. I AM CERTAINLY PROUD OF THAT PROGRESS AND WANT TO SEE THAT MOMENTUM RETAINED, STEPPED UP IF AT ALL POSSIBLE, CERTAINLY NOT CUT BACK! AT THIS RATE Vol CAN CONTINUE ON AT A STEADY PACE. ANOTHER SERVICE OUR CITY HAS BEEN ABLE TO GIVE IS THE $25,000 ASSESSED VALUE EXEbM'ION TO THE DISABLED AND SENIOR CITIZENS, WHICH AMOUNTS TO BETWEEN $400,000 and $500,000 PER YEAR. THIS EQUATES TO 6 to 80 OF THE TAX DOLLAR BEFORE WE EVEN GET STARTED. I CERTAINLY HOPE THAT EVERY CITIZEN IS AWARE OF THIS FIGURE. IT IS MY OPINION THAT $1.30 PER $100.00 OF ASSESSED VALUATION IS NOT TOO MUCH TO PAY ON A NICE HOME IN A NICE PLACE TO DIVE. LAST WEEK A CITIZEN TELEPHONED ME TO TELL ME HE PELT THE CITY OF BAYTOWN GETS A LOT OF MILEAGE OUT OF THEIR MONEY AND IN HIS OPINION THEY DO A GOOD JOB. HUb IS NOT IN FAVOR OF A LARGE TAX CUT WILL YOU AND THE CITY �:OUNCIL P.,FA`E' CONSIDER A TAX RATE OF $1.30 FOR THE 198o - 1981 BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF BAYTOWN? ATTACHMENT •rv. or BAYTOWN POST OFFICE BOX 424 • TELEPHONE 422 -8281 • AREA CODE 713 • BAYTOWN, TEXAS 77520 September 19, 1980 Honorable Mayor and Fellow City Council Members: I deeply regret that a business commitment made four months ago will require my absence at the September 25 Council meeting. I had assumed that final approval of the budget would have occurred earlier as it did last year. However, because of the extensive investment in my time during seven long budget work sessions plus the Council budget hearing, I feel compelled to express my views on this important matter even though I cannot cast my vote. May I say that during the work sessions the Council carefully reviewed the budget line item by line item. Council also listened to numerous spokes- persons who made special appeals. Council has met with every city department head to discuss their operation and budget needs. Based on this extensive background, I wish to state for the record my recommendation for the 1980 -81 tax rate: It is a matter of record that next year's tax rate would be $1.13 based on last year's budget and the new assessed value of $668,000,000 dollars. This rate does not recognize inflation. Neither does it take into account the increased cost of growth. Inflation, I am sad to say, must be passed on to our citizens. This year it is 13% and that amounts to a 15 cents increase over last year's base of $1.13. Thus, we have $1.28 with inflation coverage. Baytown has grown in area and in population during the past year. It is my opinion that growth alone forces us to add police, fire, drainage, streets and other services at the rate of 3 %. This will add 4 cents to the no growth plus inflation base of $1.28. September 19, 1980 Page No. 2 In summary, I recommend the $1.13 base plus 15 cents for inflation, plus 4 cents to meet the needs of growth for a total of $1.32 per $100 valuation for the 1980 -81 tax rate. To set a lower rate would start a decline in the quality of life in Baytown. I am opposed to that because Baytown's best years are ahead of us - -not behind us. S'ncerely, Fred T. Philips Councilman, District 3 FP /kp cc: Fritz Lanham, City Manager Eileen Hall, City Clerk W CITY OF BAYTOWN T1TLE: Group Insurance BID TABULATION BID: DATE. September 24, 1980 American Nationat116.51 Mon Cross TEM QTY DESCRIPTION UNIT EXTENDET EXTENjEPB:lue NDEO q UN1 65.18 No Bid 108.39 176.00 215.14 No Bid .52 .069 Pl an A • Employee 50.15 01 48.38 Employee and Dependents 165.78 137.90 140.66 Employee and Children 83.53 76.51 80.46 82.07 Employee and Spouse 135.62 124.24 130.65 133.26 Employee and Family 165.78 151.86 159.70 162.89 Plan B Employee 41.15 43.42 44.28 v Employee and Dependents 104.22 123.74 126.21 Employee and Children No Bid 68.45 72.20 73.64 z Employee and Spouse 111.15 117.25 119.57 W Employee and Family 135.85 143.32 1.46.16 x U Plan I H Life .48 .49 .36 .36 E-' Q A D & D .07 .072 .06 .06 Plan II Life .46 .49 .38 .38 A D & D .07 .072 .06 .06 Plan III Life .42 .39 .33 .33 A D & D .07 .072 .06 .06 GROSS TOTAL LESS DISC. NET TOTA L D_IVERY .� NDEO q UN1 65.18 No Bid 108.39 176.00 215.14 No Bid .52 .069 0 U U H w x U H CITY OF BAYTOWN TITLE Group Insurance BID TABULATION BID: _ DATE. September 24, 1980 � r ' TNII. Mass. Mutual ITEM QTY DESCRIPTION unllr EXTENDED UNIT EXTENDED UNIT X NO D uNlT EXTENDED UNIT XT ND D Plan A Employee 48.57 Employee & Dependents 136.93 Employee & Children No Bid 108.92 Employee & Spouse 108.92 Employee & Family 150.10 Plan B Employee 38.34 43.16 Employee & Dependents 101.22 119.36 Employee & Children 63.76 98.86 Employee & Spouse 103.53 98.86 Employee & Family 126.55 129.26 Plan I ,Life .34 .35 A D & D .05 .06 Plan II Life .34 .33 A D & D .05 .06 Plan III Life .33 NA A D & D .05 GROSS. TOTAL LESS DISC. NET TOTAL D. _IVERY