Loading...
1979 01 11 CC Minutes90111 -1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN January 11, 1979 The City Council of the City of Baytown, Texas, met in regular session Thursday, January 11, 1979, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the Baytown City Hall. The following members were in attendance: Jody Lander Jimmy Johnson Ted Kloesel Mary E. Wilbanks Eileen Caffey *Allen Cannon Emmett 0. Hutto Fritz Lanham Dan Savage Randy Strong Eileen P. Hall Absent: Scott Bounds Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilwoman Councilwoman Councilman Mayor City Manager Assistant City Manager Assistant City Attorney City Clerk City Attorney Mayor Hutto called the meeting to order and the invocation was offered by Reverend David Caskey of the Missouri Street Church of Christ. Minutes Councilman Kloesel moved for approval of the minutes of the regular meeting of December 14, 1978, and the special meeting of January 4, 1979, and ratification of actions taken concerning each of the matters listed on the agendas of said meetings; Councilwoman Wilbanks seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Lander, Johnson, Kloesel, Wilbanks, and Caffey Mayor Hutto Nays: None Receive Petitions None. City Manager's Report Ed Emmett - Mr. Lanham reported that State Representative Ed Emmett, prior to leaving for Austin, had indicated a desire to meet with the Council. Mr. Emmett had mentioned that he would like to meet with Council early during the legislative session to become informed of Council's feelings regarding the issues that the legislature will be considering. Mr. Lanham suggested that a work session in this regard be held before the next Council meeting on January 25, 1979, at 5:30 p.m. Council had no objections. Work Session - Community Development Program - Council had expressed a desire to have a work session regarding the Community Development Program which the City will be working on during the next few months. On January 17, 1979, Bill Cornelius, Director of Planning and Traffic, will be attending an all day meeting in Houston with H -GAC to become familiar with the application procedures and what requirements must be met. The Administration would be prepared to have a work session anytime after that date. From time to time, the Administration will be presenting necessary documents to Council for consideration. 90111 -2 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 22, 1979 Councilman Kloesel suggested that Mr. Cornelius make a presentation at the next Council meeting. State Department of Highways and Public Transportation - The Administration has been notified by the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation that signal installations to be installed by the state will be let in March. The intersections involved are listed below: Bob Smith at North Main Pruett at Williams Harold at North Main Stewart at North Main James at North Main Hines /Williams at North Main Cedar Bayou at North Main All of these will be installed by the State Highway Department; the City's participation in this project is 30 %. Mr. Wasicek - At the last meeting, Mr. Wasicek appeared before Council regarding his driveway at 504 American. The Administration checked into this matter and has determined that City work did not cause this problem. The policy that was adopted several months ago was that metal pipe would be placed in driveways after an engineering investigation and determination that the problem was caused by the City and only upon request of the property owners. In some cases when a street is over -laid, the elevation is build up, but the curb and gutter elevation is not changed which causes a problem. At the time the Administration suggested the above mentioned solution, Council was apprised that this probably would not be a good solution. Placing pipe in driveways produces problems with debris and leaves gathering at the entrance to the pipe and preventing the flow of water to the gutter. Mr. Lanham suggested that perhaps Council would want to reconsider this policy with the thought of discontinuing this practice. Turnpike Authority - The Administration was asked to get additional information regarding the policy of the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation and the Turnpike Authority for toll bridges and toll roads. Mr. Lanham explained that he had talked with Mr. Goode in the state office of the Highway Department. Mr. Goode had explained that guidelines to determine what projects are to be constructed through the Turnpike Authority are those projects that the Highway Department cannot handle with tax money. In recent years, those projects that are not scheduled as part of the Highway Plan that was adopted approximately 2 years ago are also included. The SH 146 bridge was included in the Highway Plan. A project in Dallas that was on the Highway Department's priority list was made a toll road. The Turnpike Authority built the toll road after being requested to do this by the local governing body and after a determination that it would be several years before the Highway Department could get to it. This was also done during the time when the Highway Department was not receiving the funding that they are now receiving. With respect to the toll bridge in the Pasadena area which may be built in the next 2 or 3 years, preliminary work including environmental studies and necessary permits have been taken care of by the Highway Department before this was taken over by the Turnpike Authority. With the possibility of this toll bridge in the Pasadena area, serious consideration would have to be given to the feasibility of constructing a toll bridge on Highway 146. Councilwoman Wilbanks inquired as to the time frame that the Highway Department is now considering on the bridge study. No recent estimate has been given, but the last 90111 -3 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 11, 1979 estimate was 6 or 7 years. Councilman Kloesel commented that the Council is on record as pursuing the state construction of a bridge paralleling the tunnel and it might be to the City's advantage to pursue the bridge construction more extensively. Councilman Kloesel said that he felt the Council should have a work session on this with any groups in Baytown that are interested in pursuing the bridge, and that this work session needs to be held within the next month. He mentioned that an item could be placed on the agenda regarding this matter, but he felt that a work session would be the better thing to do. Assessment Street Paving Project - The work has started on Wye Drive, but all construction projects have been stalled due to the bad weather conditions. Neighborhood Center at the Baytown Sports Complex - The interior finish work is being completed. Jenkins - Hollaway Park - A small amount of work remains to be done to finish all the walkways at this site. This work plus some cleanup and final grading are all that remains to having that project completed. Sliplining - The sliplining contractor has completed the work on Florida Street. He is working in the Beecher, Burbank, and Barrymore area and has made the service connections on the sewer lines where he has pulled the pipe. Harris County Mayor's and Councilmen's Association - Council has received a notice of the Harris County Mayor's and Councilmen's Association meeting. The Administration will be in touch with Council members to see how many members will attend. Highway Department Projects - The Highway Commission will receive bids on the next phase of Spur 201 on January 19, 1979. That is the portion between Decker Drive and McKinney Road. The Highway Commission hopes to be ready to take bids on the portion from McKinney to the Cedar Bayou bridge late this year. In response to a question from Councilman Kloesel, Mr. Lanham explained that there will be two contracts let on this phase. The first contract is for dirt work and underground work and another contract will be awarded for concrete work which includes bridges. Questions or Comments Regarding the City Manager's Report Councilwoman Wilbanks reported that she and Dan Savage, Assistant City Manager, attended a meeting with Mrs. Jocelyn Wesselhoft, Director of Baytown's Senior Citizen Nutrition Center, which produced concern with the nutritional service that the senior citizens in Baytown are receiving. A couple of months ago, the state awarded the grant to the Gulf Coast Metropolitan Senior Citizens Services, Inc. Prior to that, Baytown senior citizens had been served by the Harris County Commissioner's Court. All of the services now in Baytown are being handled by this non - profit organization and Baytown people are not receiving the attention and the care that they were getting from Harris County. Councilwoman Wilbanks explained that the people working with the nutrition center were asking questions about the extent of involvement of the City, and would the City care to be more involved? The City had helped with maintenance funds for a vehicle for the senior citizen program. This vehicle has not yet arrived; therefore, the funds for this vehicle could be used in other ways. Councilwoman Wilbanks commented that as the discussion continued, she saw it to be a rather complex situation and one that Council needs to devote some time to. This nutrition site is serving many of the senior citizens of Baytown. 90111 -4 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 11, 1979 Mayor Hutto commented that he had received several calls regarding this matter in the past few weeks. He further commented that he mentioned this to Commissioner Jim Fonteno who indicated that the treatment senior citizens are receiving under this program is of general concern all over the area. Councilwoman Wilbanks explained that when this program was examined on the project review of H -GAC and when it came before the Executive Committee, all the input was to stay with the local elected officials because that made someone responsible to the people in the community. As is is now, the City does not have that link that was there before. Councilwoman Wilbanks commented that at the end of the meeting, the outcome was a request for a work session with the City Council so that Council could be informed on this subject and to determine if the City could be of assistance. Councilman Kloesel commented that he is interested in a work session regarding this, or in having an item placed on the agenda so that Council may receive public input. He stated that he is not certain that he would favor the City expending funds toward this program, but after investigation of the matter, perhaps a resolution could be drafted to express Council's concern. Council asked that this item be placed on the agenda for the next Council meeting. Councilwoman Wilbanks commented that she had received a phone call before Christmas from Jan Wrister concerning dogs running at large. She had asked Mrs. Wrister to record dates and events. This information was handed to Council members. Councilwoman Wilbanks felt that Council may want to give more attention to that ordinance to determine if the ordinance should be amended or if the enforcement should be stricter. Councilwoman Wilbanks asked that an item in this regard be placed on the next agenda. Consider Request of Houston Lighting and Power Company for Fuel Cost Adjustment for the Month of January 1979 Council received a copy of a letter from Jim Schaefer, District Manager for Houston Lighting and Power Company. In his letter, Mr. Schaefer sets forth the proposed fuel cost adjustment for the month of January 1979. Since his letter was written, the Public Utilities Commission has imposed an interim rate which corresponds to the new rates listed in Mr. Schaefer's letter. Those rates are in effect and it does not require Council action. The PUC has set that rate. The new rate for 1,000 KWH in January will be $35.96. This represents an increase of $4.67 over the December rate. A significant increase in fuel cost accounts for a large portion of this increase. In response to a question from Councilman Lander, Randy Strong, Assistant City Attorney, explained that the PUC postponed the re- hearing motion this morning until next week. At that time, they will hear oral arguments and final determination should be made within the two weeks following that hearing. Mayor Hutto read a paragraph from Mr. Schaefer's letter which stated, "Please note that under the new rate, fuel also appears as a much larger amount because there is no fuel charge included in the base cost as it is in the old rate. In addition, the cost of service adjustment has been eliminated under the new rate." Mayor Hutto inquired if the cost of service is included in the base rate or is the company going to come back to Council in a year and ask for a cost of service adjustment. Mr. Schaefer explained that the cost of service adjustment is still in the basic rate. 90111 -5 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 11, 1979 In response to a question from Councilman Johnson, Mr. Schaefer explained that there is no cost of fuel in the basic rate any longer. Fuel is shown as a separate item which is adjusted monthly. Hold a Public Hearing on the Proposed Annexation of the C. A. Wright Subdivision At 7:00 p.m., Mayor Hutto declared the public hearing open on the proposed annexation of C. A. Wright Subdivision. The subdivision is located north of Massey- Tompkins Road and east of Chaparral Drive. It is being subdivided into 24 lots. Mayor Hutto recognized Jack Ford, Jr., who stated his opposition to the annexation of additional property due to the fact that the City will be obligated to provide services to this area. *Allen Cannon present. With no further comments to be heard, the Mayor declared the public hearing closed. Ordinance - Removing the 2 -Hour Parking Restrictions in Portions of the Downtown Area Council's Traffic Committee approved a recommendation to remove the 2 -hour parking restrictions in portions of the downtown area. The 2 -hour parking limitations would be removed on Defee between Pruett and Jones, and between Ashbel and Commerce, on the east side of Commerce between Defee and Pearce, and on Pearce between Pruett and Commerce. The purpose for removing these limitations is to encourage employees to park elsewhere other than the Texas Avenue area. There are a total of 79 parking spaces involved. The Administration recommended approval of the ordinance. Mayor Hutto commented that the proposed ordinance only removes the 2 -hour parking on the north side of West Pearce, when he felt the restriction could be removed completely. The Mayor pointed out that only two business establishments are located in this area. Mr. Lanham said that the Traffic Committee had made their recommendation based on the location of the businesses in that area and the fact that several residences are also located there. Councilman Kloesel moved that the proposed ordinance be adopted, but with the following change- -West Pearce from South Pruett to South Commerce -both sides, and South Pruett to South Commerce -north side only. Councilman Lander seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Lander, Johnson, Kloesel, Wilbanks, and Caffey Mayor Hutto Nays: Councilman Cannon ORDINANCE NO. 2599 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE REMOVAL OF TWO -HOUR PARKING RESTRICTIONS IN SECTIONS OF THE DOWNTOWN AREA AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Public Hearing on Deregulation of Rates to be Charged by Teleprompter At 7:15 p.m., Mayor Hutto declared the public hearing open on the deregulation of rates to be charged by Teleprompter. At the December 14, 1978 meeting, representatives of Teleprompter appeared before Council to demonstrate the expanded programming which will be offered in the Baytown area, and requested that the City Council either repeal the ordinance regulating the rates or increase those rates to a level that would allow Teleprompter to offer the expanded programming. The proposed ordinance would deregulate the rates charged for cable television service in Baytown. It does not affect the 90111 -6 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 11, 1979 other provisions of the City's franchise agreement with Teleprompter. Teleprompter will still be required to pay the annual franchise fee of 3% of annual gross receipts. The proposed deregulation will allow cable television companies in Baytown to set their own rates without the approval of City Council. Mayor Hutto recognized Jack Ford, Jr., who spoke in favor of cable television and the deregulation of rates to be charged by Teleprompter. Mayor Hutto recognized Frederick J. Bradford, attorney for Teleprompter, who was available to answer questions. He stated that the plans are to get the expanded programming on- screen by February 1. Mr. Bob Poindexter, representative of Teleprompter, explained in response to a question from Council that Teleprompter has never shown any X -rated movies. Periodically, R -rated movies are shown; however, these are fully described in the program guide. Mr. Poindexter explained that Teleprompter's entire package will cost $16.95 per month, which will include Showtime movies, 24 -hour sports, classic movies and 14 hours daily of children's programs. Mr. Poindexter did mention that there is an additional charge of $3.00 per month for extra outlets. Mr. Bradford emphasized that Teleprompter does not -have an exclusive franchise and a deregulation of rates would seem to be the best thing to encourage additional cable companies to establish in this area. With no further questions or comments to be considered, Mayor Hutto declared the public hearing closed on the deregulation of rates to be charged by Teleprompter. Ordinance - Deregulating the Rates to be Charged by Teleprompter Councilman Johnson moved for adoption of the ordinance; Councilman Kloesel seconded the motion. Councilman Kloesel expressed his support of the ordinance, since he felt it non - essential to regulate the prices of closed- circuit television. He felt that if Baytown was in an area where this was the only service available, there would be a need for regulation. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Lander, Johnson, Kloesel, Wilbanks, Caffey, and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 2600 AN ORDINANCE DEREGULATING RATES TO BE CHARGED ALL PERSONS FOR CABLE TELEVISION SERVICE AND CONTAINING VARIOUS PROVISIONS RELATED THERETO. Mary Booker Appeared Mrs. Mary Booker appeared before Council to relate incidents having to do with dogs running loose in the Brownwood area and some problems which she had experienced with the current remedies of the law. Mrs. Booker ended her presentation with a plea that something be done to solve this problem in the community. Arthur Morgan Appeared Mr. Morgan appeared to speak in favor of the adoption of an ordinance to restrict commercial establishments from building directly on the property line and an ordinance to restrict certain businesses with regard to noise. Mr. Morgan had particular reference to a machine shop which is 90111 -7 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 11, 1979 in operation next to his home. The shop is built on the property line, and is only 28 inches from Mr. Morgan's bedroom. Mr. Morgan's proposal is that an ordinance be adopted to restrict a business that manufactures, rebuilds, or repairs any product and is located closer than 5 feet to a property line where a residence is located to operate from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. only. Councilman Johnson inquired if Mr. Morgan received any relief after calling the police about the noise problems. Air. Morgan responded that the police did come out and asked the machine shop operators to close. Councilman Kloesel said that he had personally inspected the machine shop and felt that the operators of the shop have done everything reasonable to eliminate noise outside the building. He also expressed the feeling that there will be times when machine work will have to be done at night, but felt that the brick wall of the shop will retain the noise. Councilwoman Wilbanks commented that there are items on the agenda that pertain to what Mr. Morgan has appeared to discuss. J. W. Pittman Appeared Mayor Hutto recognized J. W. Pittman who stated that Mr. Morgan is his neighbor and a reputable person. Mr. Pittman went on to express concern that easements dedicated to the city for public purposes are fenced. Mayor Hutto recognized John Kubik, a partner in the ownership of Ace Machine Shop, who stated that the noise from the shop was not excessive, and he would invite Council out to test the noise factor. If Council found the noise to be excessive, he would be happy to add insulation. Ordinance - Amending Section 7 -4.1 of the Code of Ordinances to Increase Setback from Residential Property This is one of the proposed ordinances that Mr. Morgan mentioned, but this does not deal with the noise problem. The proposed ordinance amends the City's building code by requiring that commercial improvements must be built at least 5 feet back from the property line when the commercial property adjoins a lot with a single family residential unit unless the residential portion of the single family unit is at least 10 feet from the property line. This amendment to the Building Code has been approved by the Building Code Appeals Board. Presently, the Building Code permits the construction of a commercial building to the property line. Whereas, a residential builder must stay at least 5 feet back from the side property line. However, the proposed ordinance could cause a problem where a commercial building is erected next to a residence and must be built 5 feet from the property line - -then later the residential property is sold for commercial use and any new construction thereon may be constructed up to the property line. This would be an inequity. The problem of constructing buildings on the property line adjacent to a residence is a problem, not just at this location, but could be a problem throughout the City. The proposed ordinance would exempt a commercial building from the new restrictions if the living area of the residential structure is located 10 feet or more from the common property line. Councilman Kloesel stated that he is a supporter of zoning. He felt that this ordinance is not a solution, but a type of zoning which may produce a 5 -foot area where litter could collect to cause another problem. 90111 -8 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 11, 1979 Councilman Lander commented that he thought it was true that even in cities that have zoning, the transition from residential to commercial creates problems. However, when such an encroachment occurs, this presents a real problem to the citizen. Citizens in this situation need some kind of protection. He felt that when a commercial establishment moves into a residential area, the establishment should pay the penalty for some protection for the neighborhood. Mayor Hutto stated that many people have small businesses in their homes. Councilman Lander responded that this is fine as long as it does not interfere with the living conditions of a family. Councilman Cannon commented that he does not want to penalize a commercial business from expanding at a location, but by the same token, a minimum of 10 feet needs to be maintained in order to protect residential areas. Councilman Kloesel felt that occupancy is more a problem than commercial buildings in residential areas because of esthetic and health problems. Councilman Lander moved for adoption of the ordinance; Councilman Cannon seconded the motion. Councilwoman Wilbanks questioned whether there might be a problem with enforcement should this ordinance pass? Mr. Lanham felt that enforcement would not be a problem. Councilman Lander commented that when someone moves a commercial establishment into a residential neighborhood, they are adversely affecting that neighborhood. Mayor Hutto recognized Jack Ford, Jr., who commented that he is in favor of zoning. Mayor Hutto recognized Mr. Jimmie Foster, a resident of the Wooster area, who spoke in favor of an accoustical building provision in the Code to alleviate noise problems. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Lander, Johnson, Wilbanks, Caffey and Cannon Nays: Councilman Kloesel Mayor Hutto ORDINANCE NO. 2601 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 7 -4.1, BUILDING CODE AMENDMENTS, OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES TO ESTABLISH BUILDING LINES FOR COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS NEXT TO RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY; REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; CONTAINING A SAVINGS CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Consider Proposed Ordinance No. 90111 -3, Regulating Noise Mr. Lanham explained that the Administration had not prepared an ordinance on this item, but there has been a memorandum placed at the Council table which was prepared by Scott Bounds regarding the present power the City has to regulate noise and other factors which should be considered in amending the present ordinance. Randy Strong, Assistant City Attorney, commented that there are 3 basic approaches to regulating noise -- ordinances enacted pursuant to a City's police power; ordinances enacted pursuant to a City's zoning power, and private lawsuits. 90111 -9 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 11, 1979 The City has available several ordinances which allow regulation of noise. Chapter 19 of the Code of Ordinances, "Noise Control," generally prohibits unreasonably loud, disturbing, and unnecessary noises. Chapter 19 specifically prohibits unreasonable noises caused by loudspeakers, radios, phonographs, or car horns. The City registers and regulates sound trucks. The City Council recently amended the animal ordinance which prohibits a person from keeping animals which cause unreasonable noise. State law also prohibits disorderly conduct. It is a Class 'C' misdemeanor, actionable in Municipal Court, for a person to intentionally or knowingly make an unreasonable noise in a public place, or in or near a private residence that he has no right to occupy. The City Administration has not had any serious enforcement problems with the existing ordinances. The federal government has established some guidelines for noise control. They have used standards based on decible levels but these levels do not necessarily reflect the annoyance level. Also, the equipment and expertise needed to monitor decible levels would require substantial administrative costs. A traditional method of controlling noise has been through zoning. By this approach, noisy type enterprises would be grouped and isolated within one zone. The City does not have a comprehensive zoning plan which would allow it to adopt such a noise zoning ordinance. Individuals may also file lawsuits for injunction against unreasonable noises or for damages caused by noise. Such private nuisance suits have been successfully prosecuted in Texas. Councilman Lander stated that it appeared from the City Attorney's memorandum that the Administration felt that the existing ordinances adequately cover this situation. Mr. Lanham responded that the Administration does feel that way, and the Police Department does enforce the existing ordinances. Mayor Hutto recognized J. A. King, who stated that he felt the present anti -noise laws are sufficient. Mayor Hutto declared a 10- minute recess. Ordinance - Awarding the Bid for the Purchase of Medium Duty Trucks Four bids were received on medium duty trucks. The bid tabulation is attached to the minutes as Attachment "A." Baytown Motors submitted the low bid in the amount of $29,496 for two 6 -yard dump trucks for the Street Department. Hugh Wood Ford submitted the low bid in the amount of $13,410.19 on one flatbed steel side dump truck for the Sanitation Department, and Baytown Motors submitted the low bid in the amount of $7,882 for one 1 -ton utility truck for the Water Distribution Division. Funds have been budgeted for the purchase of these trucks. The Administration recommended approval of the ordinance. Councilman Johnson moved for adoption of the ordinance; Councilwoman Caffey seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Lander, Johnson, Kloesel, Wilbanks, Caffey, and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None 90111 -10 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 11, 1979 ORDINANCE NO. 2602 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF MEDIUM DUTY TRUCKS BY ACCEPTING THE BIDS OF BAYTOWN MOTORS INC. FOR ITEMS NO. I AND IV AND HUGH WOOD FORD FOR ITEMS NO. II AND III OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN BID NO. 7812 -12; AND AUTHORIZING PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN FOR EACH ITEM AS SET OUT BELOW. Ordinance - Awarding the Bid for the Purchase of Police Vehicles Three bids were received for the purchase of vehicles for the Police Department. The bid tabulation is attached to the minutes as Attachment "B." Specifications for Police vehicles this year called for 116 -inch wheelbase. Hugh Wood Ford's bid did not meet specifications because the unit bid had a 114.4 inch wheelbase. Bob Hamric Cheverolet submitted the low bid on the patrol vehicles and four -door sedans. The total purchase price for all 15 vehicles would be $97,285. The budgeted amount for these vehicles is $91,125. To avoid overspending the budget, the Administration recommended deleting the purchase of one four -door sedan. Total cost of 14 vehicles will be $90,866. The Administration recommended awarding the bid for the purchase of 14 vehicles for the Police Department to Bob Hamric, Inc. Councilman Cannon moved for adoption of the ordinance; Councilwoman Caffey seconded the motion. Councilman Cannon inquired if the specifications called for the intermittent windshield wipers and suggested that this be considered for future years. Mr. Lanham responded that the specifications did not call for that type of windshield wipers. Councilman Kloesel stated that he would vote against the ordinance because he felt that sharing vehicles by the officers would be a better use of the taxpayer's dollar. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Lander, Johnson, Wilbanks, Caffey, and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: Councilman Kloesel ORDINANCE NO. 2603 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF POLICE VEHICLES BY ACCEPTING THE BID OF BOB HAMRIC, INC. FOR ITEMS NOS. I AND II OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN BID NO. 7812 -13; AND AUTHORIZING PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF BAYTOWN FOR EACH ITEM AS SET OUT BELOW. Ordinance - Authorizing the Administration to Make an Offer for Purchase of a Parcel of Land for Easement to Lift Station This item will be discussed in executive session. Ordinance - Awarding the Bid for the Purchase of a Fire Rescue Vehicle Three bids were received for the purchase of a fire rescue vehicle. The bid tabulation is attached to the minutes as Attachment "C." This item will be purchased with Revenue Sharing funds; $25,000 has been appropriated for this purchase. The total cost of this vehicle will be $18,928. The bid of Superior Southwest is the low bid when deducting $500 for having the vehicle driven to Baytown 90111 -11 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 11, 1979 rather than shipped. The vehicle would be used by the fire captain. The Administration recommended approval of the ordinance. Councilman Kloesel moved for adoption of the ordinance; Councilman Cannon seconded the motion. Councilman Lander inquired as to how this vehicle is equiped. Fire Chief McBride explained that the bid is for the module only. Equipment existing in the van now in use will be transferred to the new van. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Lander, Johnson, Kloesel, Wilbanks, Caffey, and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 2604 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF SUPERIOR SOUTHWEST, INC., FOR THE PURCHASE OF ONE FIRE RESCUE VEHICLE AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF THE SUM OF EIGHTEEN THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED TWENTY -EIGHT AND N01100 ($18,928) DOLLARS. Ordinance - Awarding the Bid for the Purchase of Water Pumps Four bids were received for the purchase of 3 water pumps for Public Works. The bid tabulation is attached to the minutes as Attachment "D." The low bid was submitted by Pump and Power Equipment in the total amount of $1,722. The Administration recommended approval of the ordinance. Councilman Cannon moved for adoption of the ordinance; Councilman Johnson seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Lander, Johnson, Kloesel, Wilbanks, Caffey, and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 2605 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF PUMP & POWER EQUIPMENT COMPANY FOR THE PURCHASE OF PUMP EQUIPMENT AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF THE SUM OF ONE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED TWENTY -TWO AND NO 1100 DOLLARS. Ordinance - Awarding the Bid for the Purchase of a Magnetic Tape Recorder /Reproducer System Two bids were received for the purchase of a magnetic tape recorder /reproducer system for the Police Department. The bid tabulation on this item is attached to the minutes as Attachment "E." The low bid was submitted by Taft Sounds Equipment Company for the amount of $5,491. Budgeted funds will be used to purchase this equipment. The Administration recommended approval of the ordinance. Councilman Lander moved for adoption of the ordinance; Councilman Cannon seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Lander, Johnson, Kloesel, Wilbanks, Caffey, and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 2606 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF TAFT SOUND EQUIPMENT CORPORATION FOR THE PURCHASE OF ONE MAGNETIC TAPE RECORDER /REPRODUCER SYSTEM AND AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF THE SUM OF FIVE THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED NINETY -ONE AND N01100 ($5,491.00) DOLLARS. 90111 -12 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 11, 1979 Ordinance - Awarding the Bid for the Solid Waste Disposal Contract Two bids were received for the City's solid waste disposal contract. The City gave the bidders the opportunity to bid on one, two, or three year contracts. Gene Hazlewood bid a 3 -year contract at a cost of $1.25 per cubic yard. Mr. Hazlewood's landfill is located on Cedar Bayou and is only 4 miles from the Municipal Service Center. The other bid was from Browning and Ferris, Inc. of Houston who bid on 1, 2, and 3 -year contracts. Their bid was as follows: 1- year - $1.10 / cu.yd.; 2 -year - $1.18 /cu.yd.; 3 -year - $1.25 / cu.yd. The Browning and Ferris landfill site is located 20 miles from the MSC. The current contract expires on April 1, 1979. The current cost is $.90 per cubic yard. This is the same amount the City has paid since April 1976. Because of the closer location of the Hazlewood landfill, the time and expense of disposing of the City's solid waste at that site makes it more attractive than the Browning and Ferris site. The Administration recommended that the contract be awarded to Gene Hazlewood for the 3 -year period. Councilman Johnson moved for adoption of the ordinance; Councilwoman Caffey seconded the motion. In response to a question from Councilman Johnson, Mr. Lanham explained that the budgeted amount would be enough to cover the increase unless the volume of solid waste increases more than anticipated. Additional funds were budgeted in anticipation of an increase in costs. Mr. Lanham commented that the Administration proposes to make some changes in the contract. Councilman Kloesel suggested that the City look into the possibility of purchasing some land as an alternative in case the price becomes prohibitive in the next few years. Mr. Savage explained that Gulf Coast Waste Disposal Authority is trying to develop a transfer station concept. They have been working with several cities inside the ship channel. Basically the problem is that in the entire Harris County region, a choice of landfill sites is no longer available. The GCWDA is trying to work up arrangements whereby transfer stations can be sited, and residential and commercial collection can take place at a reasonable cost. Then, a disposal site must be found where the refuse can be hauled for final disposition. A number of concepts have been discussed, including steam generation, but nothing has firmed up yet. Mr. Lanham commented that this is probably 2 or more years away and hopefully by the time this contract is up, there will be a regional solution to the problem. Mr. Strong commented that there have been 3 major changes in this new contract. The previous contract has a $20,000 security deposit which the City does not require in the new contract. The old contract stated that the landfill would be open on Saturday afternoons - -this has been deleted from the new contract. The third and most significant change was that in this contract, either party can assign the contract to a third party. The City could franchise out the collection to someone else and use the same landfill agreement. 90111 -13 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 11, 1979 Councilman Kloesel commented that he is definitely interested in negotiating to keep the landfill open all day on Saturdays. He felt that there is a need for the citizens of Baytown to have a place to dump their trash at least one full day on weekends. If not, the City needs to locate some stations where people can dump their trash. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Lander, Johnson, Kloesel, Wilbanks, Caffey, and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 2607 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE BID OF GENE B. HAZLEWOOD FOR THE OPERATION OF A SANITARY LANDFILL FOR THE DISPOSAL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN'S MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE ON A UNIT PRICE BASIS WITH COMPENSATION TO BE PAID UPON THE ACTUAL QUANTITIES DISPOSED OF; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Resolution No. 654 - Approving the Agreement Between the State of Texas and Southern Pacific Transportation Company Regarding the Lee Drive Railroad Crossing The proposed resolution approves an agreement between the State of Texas and the Southern Pacific Transportation Company regarding the installation of grade crossing warning systems at the intersection of the railroad tracks and Lee Drive. This installation will be accomplished at no expense to the City. The Administration recommended approval of the resolution. Councilwoman Wilbanks moved for the adoption of the resolution; Councilwoman Caffey seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Lander, Johnson, Kloesel, Wilbanks, Caffey, and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None RESOLUTION NO. 654 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE STATE OF TEXAS AND SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY REGARDING THE LEE DRIVE RAILROAD CROSSING. Resolution No. 655 - Formally Accepting the West Main Street Bridge and Instructing the Consulting Engineers to Delete All Reference to Fenders from the Permit Drawing, and Providing for the Removal of the Fenders From the Waterway The proposed resolution formally accepts the West Main Street Bridge from Harris County and instructs the consulting engineers to delete all reference to fenders from the permit drawing, and provides authorization for the removal of the fenders from Goose Creek. Passage of this resolution is necessary for the City to secure a permit to construct a pedestrian walkway across Goose Creek at the West Main Street bridge. Council received a copy of a letter from J. Irico, Chief of the Bridge Administration Branch of the Department of Transportation, United States Coast Guard. In his letter, Mr. Irico indicated that the West Main Street bridge is presently in violation of the original permit requirements pertaining to vertical clearance due to subsidence. However, this reduced vertical clearance has not posed any navigational problems. There is no existing commercial navigation on Goose Creek in the vicinity of the bridge site, nor is there any foreseeable prospect for future commercial navigation at the site. As long as the reduced 90111 -14 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 11, 1979 clearance does not interfere with navigation, including recreational boating, the Coast Guard will not require the City of Baytown to restore the bridge to its original permitted vertical clearance. Mr. Lanham explained that the state law provides that all public highways and annexed territory become, without any action on the part of municipal authorities, streets of the municipalities. Therefore, this is a City bridge. Councilman Cannon pointed out that if future navigation warrants, the City is committing itself to restoring the bridge to the original permitted clearance. Councilwoman Caffey felt that from the appearance of the bridge, it may not be structurally sound. She also expressed the feeling that someday there may be navigation in the bays. Councilman Johnson asked Jim Hutchison, of Busch, Hutchison, and Associates, if the bridge is structurally sound. Mr. Hutchison the pilings have been hit and the consulting recommending that while the City is removing the concrete pilings be repaired. representative Nest Main Street responded that engineers are the fenders, Councilman Kloesel moved for the adoption of the resolution; Councilman Lander seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Lander, Johnson, and Kloesel Mayor Hutto Nays: Council members Wilbanks, Caffey, and Cannon RESOLUTION NO. 655 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE WEST MAIN STREET BRIDGE AND ACCEPTING CONDITIONS FOR MODIFICATION OF THE BRIDGE. Resolution No. 656 - Designating Federal Aid Urban Systems Project The improvements to Bayway Drive were financed by the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation. The funds were from the Federal Aid Urban Systems Program. It has been the City's thought all along that the Highway Department would continue to build Bayway in segments using funds from the same source. The state has funds available to build the next segment of Bayway, from Crow Road to Park Street. The City has been asked to recommend eligible projects to be included in the next 2 -year program, 1979 to 1980. The suggested amounts to base computations on are in the $300,000 to $400,000 range. Each project should be assigned a priority. Projects in varying price ranges should be recommended. The Administration suggested that the City continue to put Bayway Drive as the City's highest priority, that is, Bayway Phase III from Park Street to somewhere in the Exxon Plant property. The estimated cost for this work is $600,000. The remainder of the project - Bayway Phase IV to Market Street would cost approximately $600,000. Several signal installations and improvements were included in the priorities. The following is a list of those improvements: Lee Drive /Vest Main - $28,000 Missouri /Loop 201 - $23,000 Garth /Northwood /Scenic - $44,000 Garth Rollingwood - $26,000 Garth /Park - $23,000 Garth /Baker - $23,000 90111 -15 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 11, 1979 Mr. Lanham pointed out that some of those projects are in the City's plan for Phase II of the Signal Improvement Program, but should not be deleted from those plans unless the state agrees to fund the projects. By doing this, the City will be following their suggestion of including several projects with various estimated costs. Mr. Lanham explained that a second part of this resolution would be to add Garth Road between Loop 201 and Lynchburg /Cedar Bayou Road to the Federal Aid System, and SH 146 between Loop 201 and Ferry Road to the system. Councilman Kloesel inquired when the City officially decided on Bayway Drive through the Exxon plant? Mr. Lanham responded that this was never officially done. Councilman Kloesel felt that Bayway Drive in some areas has a good road bed and he felt that Bayway Drive should remain on the same route. Mr. Lanham explained that this project had been discussed on several occasions and especially when the Bayway water line was routed through the Exxon plant. However, this item would have to be presented to Council for a trade -out on the right -of -way before if could finally be accomplished. Mr. Lanham explained that the big advantage of relocating Bayway to the community is that it would get that property away from Baytown Junior School and away from residential streets and on to Market Street. Councilman Lander pointed out that there is going to be some expense involved in relocating the road. He also pointed out that the refinery tank farm will be located in close proximity, which would cause problems. In response to questions from Council, Jim Hutchison explained that the rerouting of Bayway was Exxon's request. In laying the water line through the Exxon plant, the engineering firm laid out the entire right -of -way for Bayway Drive and there is adequate space for a roadway. Councilman Lander commented that it might be a good idea for the City to contact Exxon about the rerouting of Bayway because many new tanks have been installed in this area and this would be bringing a roadway close to some tanks that are handling volatile materials. Mr. Lanham felt it would be unnecessary for the City to spell out where Phase III would be located exactly. Councilman Cannon moved for adoption of the resolution; Councilman Kloesel commented that he would like to change the priority concerning Bayway Drive from Park Street to Market Street. Mr. Lanham explained that there would be no need to list a route. Therefore, Councilman Kloesel seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Lander, Johnson, Kloesel, Wilbanks, Caffey, and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None RESOLUTION NO. 656 A RESOLUTION ENDORSING THE REVISED FEDERAL AID URBAN SYSTEMS AND REVISED URBAN BOUNDARIES IN THE HOUSTON METROPOLITAN AREA. Consider Proposal to Cover the Signal and Install Temporary Yield Signs at the Intersection of South Main /West Main/ South Alexander Council's Traffic Committee approved a recommendation to cover the signal and install a temporary yield sign at the intersection of South Main /West Main /South Alexander. 90111 -16 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 11, 1979 Several months ago the signal at this intersection was out of service. The signal head was covered and temporary yield signs were placed at the intersection, which worked very well. The Traffic Committee would like to run a 90 -day experiment on this to see if this should be done permanently. The Administration recommended approval of the proposal. Councilman Cannon moved to accept the recommendation of the Administration; Councilman Johnson seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Lander, Johnson, Kloesel, Wilbanks, Caffey, and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None Consider Letter Regarding Land Use in the Vicinity of the Proposed Municipal Airport The final instrument required by the engineers for submission to the FAA for consideration is an indication from the City that the City will take all steps within its legal power to guide development which is compatible with the proposed normal airport operations. This includes the adoption of an airport hazard ordinance and limiting development in noise sensitive areas. The purpose of this is to insure, for example, that a tall building is not built at the end of a runway. Council received a copy of a letter which the Mayor would sign giving the FAA this assurance. The Administration recommended approval of the letter. Councilman Kloesel moved to accept the recommendation of the Administration; Councilwoman Caffey seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Lander, Johnson, Kloesel, Wilbanks, Caffey, and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None Councilman Kloesel commented that he is really concerned about the location selected for the airport. He felt that Council should consider a site further north of the present site or in Chambers County because he felt that the airport could not be located too close to the City. He also stated that Interstate 10 will be built up in years to come which would pose more problems. He commented that most of the airports being constructed now are at a considerable distance from any town. He felt that it would be better to consider relocating now rather than to wait until airport construction has begun. In response, Mr. Hutchison stated that when Council first considered the locations for a proposed site, there were 8 sites and some were located in Chambers County. Based on the FAA evaluation, this was the best site. One consideration of the FAA is the proximity of the site to the City and serving area. Mr. Hutchison explained that for this airport, this site appears to be the best location. Councilman Kloesel said that he would like to review this again if anyone on the Council would be interested. If not, he would be willing to drop the subject. Councilman Lander stated that the City had experts in this field look at the situation; therefore, he would not know what other course to take other than accepting the recommendation of the experts. Discuss Proposed Charter Amendments At the Special Meeting of January 4, 1979, Councilman Kloesel requested that an item be placed on the agenda to discuss the proposed Charter amendments. He said that 90111 -17 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 11, 1979 Council has had some time to think about the proposed amendments and to consider what effect the amendments might have on the City. The first amendment would put a limitation on the tax rate. In a sense, if the fourth amendment passes, the City would be limited in their general fund, but there would be no limitation on the bonded indebtedness other than the voters decision to approve the bonds or not. Councilman Lander inquired if Council would designate what portion of the tax levy will go toward the general fund and operating expense and what portion will go toward debt retirement? Mr. Lanham explained that it would work very much as it does at the present time. Mr. Lanham also pointed out that there is always the constitutional limitation that would apply to the total levy. Councilman Kloesel commented that that was the question- - whether the bonded indebtedness would override that constitutional levy. He commented that if the first amendment passed, the City would have a limitation of $.60. At the present time, the City's portion of the General Fund is approximately $.97, and the City is looking at a possible reduction of $.50. The City's total levy is now $1.44. Mr. Lanham also commented that the two together, the general fund and the principal and interest requirements, would exceed the six - tenths of one percent. Councilman Kloesel inquired if the indebtedness is all voted by bonds or does the City have other indebted obligations not actually passed by voters. Mr. Lanham commented that the City still owes approximately $50,000 to $100,000 in certificates of obligation for fire vehicles. Councilman Kloesel commented that from a practical standpoint, the first amendment would not really have any effect on reducing taxes if the fourth amendment also passes. The general fund would remain the same. Mr. Lanham commented that the City would be able to tax for general fund purposes below the maximum. Councilman Lander inquired if the fourth amendment would apply only to the new bond issues. Mr. Lanham replied that it would apply to all bonds. Mr. Lanham further explained that bond attorneys have indicated that these amendments would apply to bonds that are currently outstanding because the City has a contract on existing bonds. He further explained that if Council wanted to reduce taxes below what is necessary to pay those bonds, he felt that this could not be done. It was the intent of Amendment No. 4, as it was worded, to exempt all bonds that were voted from the limitation. Councilman Lander commented that on six - tenths of one percent tax levy, if property were to be assessed at true market value, the taxes would be the same as they are now. Councilman Cannon commented that if Amendment No. 3 became effective the day after Amendment No. 2, the City would not have any problem - -but property that is valued at 30% now can never get caught up to the property that is on the rolls at current market value. Councilman Lander stated that the City will not raise any value until the entire City is revalued and inquired if that 10% applies to this first time revaluation. Mr. Lanham explained that Amendment No. 2 provides that the City would bring the values up to the 1977 values. What this means is that the 10% does not apply until the entire City is brought up to 1977 valuation. 90111 -18 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 11, 1979 Hear Report on Watershed for the Baytown Area Council received a report and a memorandum from Randy Strong, Assistant City Attorney, concerning a watershed for the Baytown area. These are on file in the City Clerk's office. Mr. Lanham commented that the Council might want to read the report and it there are any questions, the Administration would try to answer them. Mr. Lanham stated that what has been done is that the Administration has summarized some of the studies that have been made. One of the important points to stress is that the information is available and it is in the Sterling Municipal Library and also at City Hall. The Houston - Galveston Area Council has an ongoing study on this. Councilman Kloesel commented that his concern was about pollution of the water in this area. It affects a greater area than just Baytown. There are deposits of solid waste and septic systems in the watershed area. If the City receives some of this waste directly into the water system, the City would have an extremely unhealthly situation. He felt that the state may need to take a position on this. Consider Designation of Charter Committee Councilman Kloesel commented that he would like the Council to appoint a Charter Committee. If a committee is set up by Council, they could submit proposed changes to Council, which changes could be submitted to the voters. In response to a question from Councilman Kloesel, Mr. Strong commented that state laws set out the way of amending City Charter, and the Charter itself states that when making amendments, the same procedure must be followed. Council passes an ordinance to put to vote whether there shall be a commission chosen to frame a new Charter. Then the citizens would vote on whether they want a Charter Commission and who would be on it at the same time. Councilman Cannon emphasized that if these amendments are passed, Council will be restricted for 2 years to reconsider the Charter. He stated that he would like to encourage anyone to oppose the Charter amendments. He is in complete agreement with limiting spending. If all 4 amendments were defeated, then a Charter committee would be appointed to review the entire Charter, including the 4 amendments. If Council would spend the proper time, with the proper legal advice on the situation, the Charter Commission may be able to give Baytown something that would be constitutional, reasonable, and enforceable. This then could be put to a vote. Councilman Kloesel concurred with Councilman Cannon and stated that he would be willing to wait until after the election because he feels that the changes that are proposed will not really solve the problem. Councilman Cannon commented that he will support appointing a Charter Study Committee if the 4 amendments are defeated. Councilman Kloesel commented that if Council were to appoint a committee at the present time, it would likely fade away within a 2 -year period. Councilman Lander stated that another factor to be considered is the fact that the City's Charter regarding taxes can be overridden by the state legislation. Councilman Kloesel commented that he will wait until after the referendum election to see what will happen and then Council may want to consider the Charter Study Committee. 90111 -19 Minutes of the Regular Meeting - January 11, 1979 Consider Appointment of Street Construction Committee Due to the late hour, Councilman Kloesel stated that he would ask that this item be placed on the agenda of a later meeting. Consider Appointments to the Electrical Board This item will be discussed in Executive Session. Consider Appointments to the Mobile Home Review Board This item will be discussed in Executive Session. Committee Reports None. Unfinished Business Councilman Johnson wanted to congratulate the Police Department on the two letters of commendation that were in the agenda packet. Recess and Reconvene At this time, Mayor Hutto recessed the open meeting into Executive Session to discuss legal matters, land acquisition, and personnel matters. When the open meeting was reconvened, the following business was transacted: Ordinance - Authorizing the Administration to Make an Offer for the Purchase of a Parcel of Land for Easement to Lift Station The proposed ordinance authorizes the Administration to purchase a parcel of land for easement to lift station in the Roseland Oaks area. An appraisal of the property has been obtained. The ordinance authorizes payment by the City of the sum of $6,000 for said tract of land. Councilman Johnson moved for adoption of the ordinance; Councilman Kloesel seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Council members Lander, Johnson, Kloesel, Wilbanks, Caffey, and Cannon Mayor Hutto Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 2608 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO MAKE AN OFFER ON AND PURCHASE LOT 14, BLOCK 1, ROSELAND OAKS, FROM FIRST AMERICAN BANK AND TRUST OF BAYTOWN OR OTHER PARTIES OF INTEREST; AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT BY THE CITY OF THE SUM OF $6,000 DOLLARS; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Adjourn With no further business to be transacted, Councilwoman Caffey moved for adjournment; Councilman Johnson seconded the motion. The vote for adjournment was unanimous. �J aren Petru, Deputy City Clerk APPROVED: P. ,, �'� Eileen P. Hall, City Clerk EXHIBIT "A" 90111 -20 CITY OF BAYTOWN TITLE: MEDIUM DUTY TRUCKS BID TABULATION BID: 7812 -12 DATE. December 18, 1978 - 9:30 a.m. ITEM QTY. DESCRIPTION BAYTOWN UNIT MOTORS 'EXTENDED HUGH WOOILFORn UNIT EXTENDED JIM RAIL UNIT I JNTFR EXTENDED VINSON B UNIT YTOWN QODGE EXTENDED UNIT EXTENDED RICE PRIrF 1. 2 ea. DUMP TRUCK, 6 cubic yard $14,748. $29,496.00 14,856. 29,712.72 14,800. $29,600.00. NO BID MAKE E MODEL: GMC C7D0 2 Ford. F -700 Int. S -1824 2. 2 ea. FLATBED DUMP TRUCK - 16 -ft. Flatbed $13,593. $27,186.00 ')12,940.13 $25,880.38 13,519. 3 $27,038.21 NO BID MAKE 6 MODEL: GMC C70012 Ford- F -600 [I nt. S -1724 3. 1 each FLATBED DUMP TRUCK, Steel Side $13,973.00 $13,410.19 $13,645.71 NO BID MAKE & MODEL: GMC C700 h2 Ford F -600 - Int. S -1724 4. 1 ea. ONE TON TRUCK, with Utility Body $ 7,882.00 $ 8,288.92 NO BID $ 8,195.37 MAKE & MODEL: GMC C350C Ford F -350 Dodge D-300 Powers S 300 -106 None Giv n Koenig 58D -4R DELIVERY A.R.O. 90 days None Giv n 120 -140 days 120 day I o i • r N N GROSS 1OTAL . $78,537.00 $77,242.21 LESS DISC.: NET TOTAL DELIVERY- EXHIBIT "B" 90111 -22 is GROSS TOTAL LESS .DISC. NET, -70TA L P. n F1' 1� /FfaY' '. $94,264.25 $97,285.00 $98,169.75 GITY"'- -OF BAYTOWN TITLE: P01M=xw VEHICLES BID TABULATION BID: 7812 -13 DATE. December 19, 1978 ITEM QTY DESCRIPTION FHUGIHN,T° DExrENDEO UNIT EXTENDED UNIT EXTENDED UNIT EXTENDED UNIT EXTENDED ICE F Ppirr 1 13 each PATROL VEHICLES 6,290.95 $81,782.35:: $6,499.0 $84,487.00 $6,558-65 $85,262.45 MAKE AND MODEL Ford LTD If Chevrolet Impala Dodge St. Regis 2 2 each FOUR DOOR SEDAN 6,240.95 $6,399.00.$12,798-00 $6,453..6 $12,907.30 MAKE AND MODEL Ford LTD I Chevrolet Impala Dodge St. Regis DELIVERY A.R.O. Not given 90 days 120 day * Does not meet specif cations is GROSS TOTAL LESS .DISC. NET, -70TA L P. n F1' 1� /FfaY' '. $94,264.25 $97,285.00 $98,169.75 VA EXHIBIT "C" 90111 -24 CITY O F BAYTO WN TITLE: FIRE RESCUE VEHICLE BID 'TABULATION BID: 79t -ts DATE.- January 3, 1979 PIERCE MFG. INC SUPERIOR SOUTHWEST MARION WKS ITEM Q TY DESCRIPTION UNIT EXTENDED UNIT EXTENDED UNIT UNIT EXTENDED UNIT EXTENDED rp C 1 1 each FIRE RESCUE VEHICLE $19,156.00: $19,423.00 21,725:00 TRUCK MAKES MODEL: 1979 Che rolet'. 1979 Chevrolet 1979 Ch vrolet : BODY MAKES MODEL: Pierce C V -16 Emergency One Marion Irire.Rescue No. 1006 1 DELIVERY A.R.O. 180 -240 Days 160 days 240 day Deduct $500.00 for Deduct $1,048.00 drive in of vehicle for drive In of. vehicle cn ' GROSS TOTAL LESS DISC. NET. 'TOTA L... .DELIVERY EXHIBIT "D" fk 90111 -26 CITY OF BAYTOWN TITLE: WATER PUMPS BID TABULATION BID: 791 -16 DATE January 5, 1979 - 9:30 a.m. ITEM QTY DESCRIPTION vNIT EXTENDED UNIT EXTENDED UNIT EXTENDED UNIT EXTENDED UNIT EXTENDED RICE 1 3 each WATER PUMPS $574.00 $1,722.00 $674.00 $2,022.00 $700.00 $2,100.00 $665.00 $1,995.00 MAKES MODEL Gorman -R pp Gorman- upp Non -Gi n Non -Giv n 83A17 83A17 DELIVERY A.R.O. 45 days 14 days 2 days 5 days C i • N GROSS TOTAL LESS DISC. N. NET:. TOTA L DELIVERY 94111 -28 EXHIBIT "Ell CITY OF BAYTOWN TITLE: MAGNETIC TAPE RECORDER /REPRODUCER SYSTEM BID TABULATION BID: 791 -17 , DATE: January 5, 1979 1TEM QTY DESCRIPTION ND EQUIP SOUNDSCRIBER CO. FR EXTENDED UNIT EXTENDED UNIT ENDED UNIT EXTENDED UNIT EXTENDED PRICF i l system MAGNETIC TAPE RECORDER/REPRODUCER $5,491.00 $5,765.55 SYSTEM MAKE Soundscr ber Soundsc iber DELIVERY A.R.O. 30 days 30 days • o • N i N GROSS TOTAL LESS DISC. NET. TOTAL' DELIVERY