1971 07 20 CC Minutes5040
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR
MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF BAYTOWN
July 20, 1971
The City Council of the City of Baytown, Texas met in regular session on
Tuesday, July 20, 1971 at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Room of the Baytown City Hall
with the following members in attendance:
Ted Kloesel Councilman
C. O. Walker Councilman
Jody Walker Councilman
Leonard Stasney Councilman
Allen Cannon Councilman
Jim McWilliams Councilman
C. Glen Walker Mayor
Kenneth DeHart Acting City Attorney
Edna Oliver City Clerk
The Mayor called the meeting o0 order and the Invocation was offered.
He then called for the minutes of the regular meeting on Jly 6th. Councilman
Stasney offered the following correction: Parks r Recreation... Recommendation:
Councilman Stasney stated that roads and public buildings would not be a valid
use for matching funds. With this correction, Councilman Kloesel moved to approve
the minutes as corrected. Councilman Lander seconded the motion. The vote follows:.
Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel, Walker, Lander, Stasney, Cannon and McWilliams
Mayor Walker
Nays: None
Councilman Lander moved to approve the minutes of the special meeting on
July 13th as submitted in written form. Councilman Stasney seconded the motion.
The vote follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel, Walker, Lander, Stasney, Cannon and McWilliams
Mayor Walker
None; None
Representative Boise Cascade Apartments - Sanitary Sewer Service
Mr. Braham, representing the Boise - Cascade Apartment Complex off Baker
Road, appeared before the council to express objections to the action of the Council
at the July 6th meeting when it voted to deny further tie -ins, including the
apartment project, to the sanitary sewer system of the Craigmont Treatment Plant
until the movable plant, now under contract, is in place and ready for use. He
reviewed the steps that have been taken heretofore by the developer in relation to
available facilities, particularly sewage treatment and stated that the cityaappears
to have broken faith on two occasions, in April and July of 1971. He continued by
saying that the issue of initial occupancy as a supplement income for the property
is most imperative as the developer is 3 or 4 months behind in the income projections
and asked the Council to reconside: its action of July 6 which pertains to the 236
apartment project. He requested immediate permission to occupy which will be over
an extended period which should not effect the functioning of the Craigmont Plant
and that the Council control the increase to any plant, not just to Craigmont plant
before the construction permit, not after permit has been approved. The Council heard
Mr. Brehm and offered some questions following his presentation as a matter of
clarification.;. but no action was taken upon his request to permit the management
to occupy the apartments prior to the date of the completion of the movable
treatment plant.
Don Hallam - Exception to No. 2 Fire Zone - Property Abutting Minnesota Street
Don HulluM appeared to request the Council to grant him permission to move
a mobile home on a lot abutting a washateria which he owns at 3323 Minnesota Street.
The area in question is in the No. 2 Fire Zone of the city and would require a 30 -foot
clearance on each side of the unit, and this is not possible because of the width of the
5041
Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel, Walker, Lander, Stesney, Cannon and
McWilliams
Mayor Walker
Nays: None
mayor Walker then called for the vote on the original motion, plus the
amendment. The vote follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel, Walker, Lander, Stasney, Cannon and McWilliams
Mayor Walker
Nays: None
Councilman Kloesel then moved to request the Administration to give
the City Council a report with a recommendation to complete the study of
fire zone boundaries within the next nineth (90) days. Councilman
Stasney seconded the motion. Fire Chief Bland stated that to do this
type of project objectively he will need the services of a Fire Protection
engineer or a representative of the State Board of Insurance to do it
adequately. He suggested forming a committee from the insurance industry,
property owners to make it equitable to all parties involved. Following
further discussion, Councilman Stasney withdrew his second to the motion.
Councilman Walker then seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel, Walker, Lander, Stasney, Cannon and McWilliams
Mayor Walker
Nays: None
Verdette Hall - Consulting Services - Rate increase and Franchise Negotiatio
Telephone Compa
The Council heard Mr. Verdette Hall, a representative of Communication
Management, Inc., who offered consulting services to assist the City in
determining the rate increase and new franchise negotiations with General
Telephone Company. The retainer fee was quoted as $1,500 per month and
he would expect to complete the study in approximately sixty (60) days. The
Council submitted several questions for clarification, and concluded by
thanking Mr. Hall for the information he supplied.
RS°
lot. Mr. Hullum explained that his place of business has been vandalized
or robbed five times in the past two weeks and this move would be for the
protection of his investment. Councilman Kloesel stated that he felt there
is a need for considering revisions to the fire zones of Baytown. Some
areas included have depreciated to such an extent until it is not feasible
to include them within the zones but other areas are presently outside the
fire zones and should be included. He suggested modifications be made
following the completion of a study. Councilman Stasney stated that he
had looked at the location in question at this meeting and felt that some
modifications could be made that would protect the business firm or firms
facing Mennesota Street as there is a need for fire zoning because of the
high loss risks. In this particular instance, the lots are approximately
200 feet deep and the back portion of the lots have apartments build on
them. He suggested that the first 100 feet be included in the fire zone
and the back 100 feet be excluded. This would permit Mr. Hullum to move
in the mobile home, place it at the rear of the property near his building
and solve his problem. Councilman Lander expressed concern if the
amendment would effect the city's fire insurance rate. Fire Chief Bland
stated that it would affect the individual in question. He concurred that
there is a need to modify the present fire zone ordinance but it should be
done on an indepth study rather than an exceptional type situation. Council-
man Stasney moved to instruct the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance, for
adoption at a later meeting, granting exception in this case for the one
particular lot in question. Councilman Cannon seconded the motion. Councilmen
Lander then moved to amend the original motion to add provided it does not
jeopardize or increase the insurance of the neighboring properties. Councilman
Kloesel seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel, Walker, Lander, Stesney, Cannon and
McWilliams
Mayor Walker
Nays: None
mayor Walker then called for the vote on the original motion, plus the
amendment. The vote follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel, Walker, Lander, Stasney, Cannon and McWilliams
Mayor Walker
Nays: None
Councilman Kloesel then moved to request the Administration to give
the City Council a report with a recommendation to complete the study of
fire zone boundaries within the next nineth (90) days. Councilman
Stasney seconded the motion. Fire Chief Bland stated that to do this
type of project objectively he will need the services of a Fire Protection
engineer or a representative of the State Board of Insurance to do it
adequately. He suggested forming a committee from the insurance industry,
property owners to make it equitable to all parties involved. Following
further discussion, Councilman Stasney withdrew his second to the motion.
Councilman Walker then seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel, Walker, Lander, Stasney, Cannon and McWilliams
Mayor Walker
Nays: None
Verdette Hall - Consulting Services - Rate increase and Franchise Negotiatio
Telephone Compa
The Council heard Mr. Verdette Hall, a representative of Communication
Management, Inc., who offered consulting services to assist the City in
determining the rate increase and new franchise negotiations with General
Telephone Company. The retainer fee was quoted as $1,500 per month and
he would expect to complete the study in approximately sixty (60) days. The
Council submitted several questions for clarification, and concluded by
thanking Mr. Hall for the information he supplied.
RS°
5042
John Humphrey — Baytown Fire Fighters Association - Pay Increase & Fringe Benefits
John Humphrey, spokesman for the Baytown Firefighters Association, Local 1173,
appeared to present the Association's request for increase-in wages and other
benefits, They are enumerated as follows:
1. $100 per month across the board pay increase
2. 48 hour work week
3. Increase vacation days allowance
4. Restoring pay roll deduction for fire fighter association dues
'5. City increase contribution for the retirement program
6. For two additional holidays per year
7. City to pay for all hospitalization insurance premiums for dependents
of employees
8. $1.00 per month- increase in longevity
9. Do not create any pay or fringe benefit disparity between the Police and
Fire Departments
The Council submitted several questions relating to several items listed but
no action was taken on the requests at this meeting. These requests will be considered
during the forthcoming budget study.
Carl Connerton, Jr. - Three Items
Carl Connerton, Jr. submitted three items for Council consideration. (1) During
budget study, he has heard there will be no workshop, only breakfast meetings. He
wanted the Council to stay away from breakfast meetings as he could not attend; and
(2) redistricting after Federal Census; and (3) asked council to appeal his case
to the highest level so that he can have his name placed on the ballot in 1972 should
he desire. Recent action of the State Legislature will become law as of August 30,
1971, and states that the State Law will supersede any City Charter when a conflict
is found.
Travis Porter - Brownwood Civic Association"
Travis Porter, President of the Brownwood Civic Association, asked when the
Citx would start work on the perimeter roads in Brownwood. Mayor Walker reported
that he had received official notification from Commissioner Bray that the
County will furnish the trucks and man -power for hauling the dirt for the
internal levy project which will.help in lowering the cost of the project so that
the $200,000 provided in the bond fund may cover the costs. By this action, the
date for starting the project will be brought nearer and when this information is
available the Civic Association will be notified. The Council expressed appreciation
to Commissioner Bray for his assistance in this matter of hauling.
Bids - Chlorine - Rock Asphalt,.- Boat Ramp Lighting - Street Repaving
Bids were received on four contracts and they are tabulated as follows:
Liquid Chlorine
Diamond Shamrock
Jones Chemical
Van Waters & Rogers
Thompson Hayward
S. E. C. Corp (not complete)
total
bid
$15,312.50
total
bid
$15,312.50
total
bid
$15,312.50
total
bid
$17,000.00
total
bid
$ 6,336.00
The present supplier is Diamond Shamrock, who is equally low with two other
firms. It was the recommendation of the Administration that the contract be
awarded to Diamond Shamrock. Councilman McWilliams moved to award the contract
to Diamond Shamrock as recommended by the Administration. Councilman Walker seconded
the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel, Walker, Lander, Stasney, Cannon and McWilliams
Mayor Walker
Nays: None
Minutes, July 20, 1971
Precoated Rock Asphalt Aggregate and Premix Pock Asphalt
5043
Whites Mines
Precoat Rock
Asphalt Aggregate
Premix Asphalt
Grade 3
$5.19
$2,595.00
$5.75 $8,625.00
Grade 4
$5.39
$2,695.00
Grade 5
$5.49
$2,745.00
Total bid: $16,660.00
9R9
Uvalde Rook Asphalt Premix Asphalt
Grade 3 $5.16 $2,580.00 $5.82 $8,730.00
Grade 4 $5.38 $2,690.00
Grade 5 $5.48 $2,740 Total bid: $16,740.00
It was the recommendation of the Administration that the White's Mines
Bid be accepted. Following some discussion, Councilman McWilliams moved to
accept the recommendation of the Administration, and accept the low bid of
White's Mines. Councilman Cannon seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel, Walker,, Lander, Stasney, Cannon and McWilliams
Mayor Walker .
Nays: None
Three bids were received for additional lighting installation in
Roseland Park. The tabulation follows:
Baytown Industrial Corporation $1,800
Cantrell Electrical Co. $1,850
Vomsand Electric Co. No bid
It was the recommendation of the Administration that the contract be
awarded to the low bidder, Baytown Industrial Corporation. Councilman
Kloesel stated that he felt that Cantrell Electrical Company had the better
bid because of their experience in the electrical contracting field. He
concluded with a motion that the Council accept the second low bid of
Cantrell Electrical Co. Councilman McWilliams seconded the motion. Following
some discussion, Mayor Walker called for the vote.
Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel and McWilliams
Nays: Councilmen Walker, Lander, Stasney, and Cannon
Mayor Walker
Councilman Stasney than moved to accept the low bid of Baytown
Industrial Corporation in the amount of $1,800. Councilman Lander seconded
the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Walker, Lander, Stasney and Cannon
Mayor Walker
Nays:: Councilmen Klossel and McWilliams
1971 Street Rebuilding Bids
Warren Brothers Company Total Bid: $109,954.30
Brown s Root, Inc. Total Bid: $133,001.40
It was the recommendation of the Administration that the low bid
of Warren Brothers Company be accepted. Councilman Stasney mentioned some
sub - standard installations made on Ward Road by Warren Brothers and expressed
his reluctance in awarding the contract without assurance of some repair
to the discrepancies presently evident on Ward Road. Following some further
discussion, Councilman Lander moved to accept the low bid of Warren Brothers
Company. Councilman Walker seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel, Lander, Walker, Cannon 6 McWilliams
Mayor Walker
Nays: None
Abstained: Councilman Stasney
9R9
5044 Minutes, July 20, 1971
Ordinance - Setting Public Hearing - Sanitary Landfill Site off Cedar Bayou -
Lynchburg Road
Acting City Attorney DeHart introduced and read an ordinance setting
the date of August 3, 1971, at 6 :30 p.m. to hold a public hearing upon the
proposed annexation of 55 acres of land owned by the city and located
in the CG & S F R R Survey off Cedar Bayou - Lynchburg Road. Councilman
Stasney moved to adopt the ordinance as read. Councilman Walker
seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel, Walker, Lander, Stasney, Cannon
Mayor Walker
Nays: None
Abstained: Councilman McWilliams
The caption of the ordinance follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 1106
AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE, TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING
ON THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY BY THE CITY OF
RAYTOWN, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH
NOTICE OF SUCH PUBLIC HEARING AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE
DATE THEREOF.
Resolution - Naming Walter Jenkins Memorial Park
Councilman Cannon moved to adopt a resolution officially dedicating
tracts of land acquired by the city from Mrs. Jenkins as a public park
and naming such tracts the "Walter Jenkins Memorial Park ". Councilman
Walker seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Councilman Kloesel, Walker, Lander, Stasney, Cannon
and McWilliams
Mayor Walker
Nays: None
The Caption of the resolution follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 344
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BAYTOWN OFFICIALLY DEDICATING TRACTS OF LAND
ACQUIRED BY THE CITY FROM MRS. LOUISE JENKINS, AS
A PUBLIC PARK, AND OFFICIALLY DESIGNATING AND NAMING
OUCH TRACTS AS THE "WALTER JENKINS MEMORIAL PARK."
Ordinance - Revising Code Enlarge Membership of Planning Commission Setting
Attendance Guideline
After introduction by Acting City Attorney DeHart, Councilman
McWilliams moved to adopt an ordinance enlarging the membership of the
Planning Commission from seven (7) to nine (9) members and to set meeting
attendance guidelines. Councilman Kloesel seconded the motion. The vote
follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel, Walker, Lander, Stasney, Cannon and
McWilliams
Mayor Walker
Nays: None
The caption of the ordinance follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 1107
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE II (BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS), DIVISION
4 (PLANNING COMMISSION), SECTIONS 2 -48, 2- 49,2 -50, and 2 -51 OF THE
CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS,FOR THE PURPOSE OF
ENLARGING THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND SETTING MEETING
ATTENDANCE GUIDELINES, REPEALING ORDINANCES INCONSISTENT HEREIN= CON-
TAINING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE THEREOF.
9 R (,
Minutes, July 20, 1971 5095
Consider Administrative Proposal Adoption New Plumbing Code
Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel, Walker, Lander, Stasney, Cannon and McWilliams
Mayor Walker
Nays: None
Consider Payment of LEGAL Fees - Vinson Elkins Suit Taxpayers Association
City Manager Voelkel reviewed the steps leading up tb.the presentation
of a statement from Vinson, Elkins, Searle & Smith of $5,000 as a fee
for services rendered in connection with the case of B. B. Williams, Authorized
Official and President of Texas Federation of Independent Business & Tax
Payers Alliance vs City of Baytown, at al, in Harris County, Texas, ,
including injunction proceedings and Motion for Suamary Judgement in District
Court. Since there was no formal Council action or agreement with the firm
as to a fee, the City Manager asked for approval of the statement by adoption
of an ordinance. Former City Attorney Laughlin explained that because of
the seriousness of the allegations of the suit, the seriousness of the suit
to the city, the fact that we had delayed the sale of the bonds because of
an unfavorable market, because of the allegations and asking for a permanent
injunction from sale of bonds, attacking the bond issue because of the procedures
which were used, those which Vinson, Elkins helped the City outline, it was
his thought that it would be no question but that the City would have to look
to the bond firm and it would be necessary to avail ourselves of the counsel
of the firm who had the opinions that the Attorney General would rely upon
for the purpose of issuing the bonds. Vinson Elkins has been the city's bond
counsel of long standing and he felt that the Council should have been aware
there would be fees for this service. At the time the suit was filed, Mr.
Laughlin explained that he had no idea what would be involved in disposing of
the law suit and he could not ask the bond firm for an estimate of, fees because
there was none available but thought it essential to ask them for their
services, because of the seriousness of the matter. At that time he suggested
that they increase the cost of their services under the bond program, but
they elected to segregate the fee because they wanted the Council to know
their fee was in relation to the law suit. Councilman Stasney stated that
as far as he knew, it was never conveyed to the Council that this service
would coat the city extra, however, Mr. Laughlin as an agent of the city
incurred the debt and the city would be obligated to pay it, but in the
future, he wanted to make sure that the Council is aware of an additional
cost. The City Manager and Mr. Laughlin both agreed that the City Council
did not authorize the expenditure. Councilman McWilliams stated that he
questioned the authorization and the size of the fee and moved not to pay
any part of the fee. Councilman Kloesel seconded the motion. Councilman
Stasney then asked if the city was obligated to pay the fee to which the
Acting City Attorney stated that he would have to brief it out to see where
the city stands in this matter. Following some further discussion, Councilman
Stasney moved to table the motion until the next regular meeting and ask
the City Manager to give the Council a legal opinion as to the legality of
incurring this debt. Councilman Walker seconded the motion.
Ayes: Councilmen Stasney, Lander, Walker
Mayor Walker
Nays: Councilmen Kloesel and Cannon
Abstained: Councilman McWilliams
f1, 7
City Manager Voelkel reviewed the recommendation of the Administration
for the adoption of a new Plumbing Code as the present code is obsolete
due to the new materials that have been tested and used successfully over
the past few years. It was the recommendation of the Administration that
the code compiled by the Texas State Board of Plumbing Examiners and the
Texas Municipal League be adopted with two amendments, namely (1) delete
ra
the use of bituminized sewer pipe, and (2) delete the use of plastic sewer
pipe installation under concrete slabs. Councilman Kloesel moved to accept
the recommendation of the Administration, including the two amendments, and
instruct the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance, for consideration at
the next regular meeting, adopting the new Plumbing Code as stipulated.
Councilman Stasney seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel, Walker, Lander, Stasney, Cannon and McWilliams
Mayor Walker
Nays: None
Consider Payment of LEGAL Fees - Vinson Elkins Suit Taxpayers Association
City Manager Voelkel reviewed the steps leading up tb.the presentation
of a statement from Vinson, Elkins, Searle & Smith of $5,000 as a fee
for services rendered in connection with the case of B. B. Williams, Authorized
Official and President of Texas Federation of Independent Business & Tax
Payers Alliance vs City of Baytown, at al, in Harris County, Texas, ,
including injunction proceedings and Motion for Suamary Judgement in District
Court. Since there was no formal Council action or agreement with the firm
as to a fee, the City Manager asked for approval of the statement by adoption
of an ordinance. Former City Attorney Laughlin explained that because of
the seriousness of the allegations of the suit, the seriousness of the suit
to the city, the fact that we had delayed the sale of the bonds because of
an unfavorable market, because of the allegations and asking for a permanent
injunction from sale of bonds, attacking the bond issue because of the procedures
which were used, those which Vinson, Elkins helped the City outline, it was
his thought that it would be no question but that the City would have to look
to the bond firm and it would be necessary to avail ourselves of the counsel
of the firm who had the opinions that the Attorney General would rely upon
for the purpose of issuing the bonds. Vinson Elkins has been the city's bond
counsel of long standing and he felt that the Council should have been aware
there would be fees for this service. At the time the suit was filed, Mr.
Laughlin explained that he had no idea what would be involved in disposing of
the law suit and he could not ask the bond firm for an estimate of, fees because
there was none available but thought it essential to ask them for their
services, because of the seriousness of the matter. At that time he suggested
that they increase the cost of their services under the bond program, but
they elected to segregate the fee because they wanted the Council to know
their fee was in relation to the law suit. Councilman Stasney stated that
as far as he knew, it was never conveyed to the Council that this service
would coat the city extra, however, Mr. Laughlin as an agent of the city
incurred the debt and the city would be obligated to pay it, but in the
future, he wanted to make sure that the Council is aware of an additional
cost. The City Manager and Mr. Laughlin both agreed that the City Council
did not authorize the expenditure. Councilman McWilliams stated that he
questioned the authorization and the size of the fee and moved not to pay
any part of the fee. Councilman Kloesel seconded the motion. Councilman
Stasney then asked if the city was obligated to pay the fee to which the
Acting City Attorney stated that he would have to brief it out to see where
the city stands in this matter. Following some further discussion, Councilman
Stasney moved to table the motion until the next regular meeting and ask
the City Manager to give the Council a legal opinion as to the legality of
incurring this debt. Councilman Walker seconded the motion.
Ayes: Councilmen Stasney, Lander, Walker
Mayor Walker
Nays: Councilmen Kloesel and Cannon
Abstained: Councilman McWilliams
f1, 7
5046
ti
Minutes, July 20, 1971
Report - Billy Angel _ . Self Service Stations - City Appeals Ruling
Mr. Laughlin reported that the 15th Court of .Civil Appeals, in a
judgement entered on July 14, 1971, affirmed the judgement of the trial
court in the Billy B. Angel setf- service gasoline station case. In
so doing, the Court of Civil Appeals agreed with the trial court's-
findings that the City's ordinance prohibiting -self +service gasoline
stations is void as being inconsistent with a- general law of the State.
As a result of the Court's holding, the City will be unable to enforce
its ordinance as to prevent additional self- service stations which
comply with the State regulatory law. The City has two _. choices„ either
appeal the decision of the Court. of Civil Appeals to the State Supreme
Court, or abide by the ruling of the Court. In order to appeal, a motion
for a rehearing must be filed in the Court of Civil Appeals on or before
,July 29, 1971,. however; this is a matter the Council must decide. Should
the Council decide to appeal, the legal fees would be from $500 to $750.
Councilman McWilliams moved to appeal the decision of the Court of Civil
Appeals to the State Supreme Court. Councilman Kloesel seconded the motion.
The vote follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel, Walker, Lander, Stasney, Cannon a:d McWilliams
Mayor Walker
Nays: None
Retain Service Laughlin Appeal Case
Councilman Kloesel moved to retain Mr. Laughlin to appeal the case.
Councilman Cannon seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel, Walker, Lander, Stasney, Cannon and
McWilliams
Mayor Walker
Nays: None
Draft Ordinance Prohibiting Mobile Gasoline Stations In Baytown
Councilman Kloesel moved to instruct the City Attorney to prepare
an ordinance, for presentation at the next regular meeting, prohibiting
mobile service stations in Baytown. Councilman Walker seconded the motion.
The vote follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel, Walker, Stasney, Lander and Cannon
Mayor Walker
Nays: None
Abstained: Councilman McWilliams
Elect - Mayor Pro Tem - Councilman Cannon
Two nominations were received for Mayor Pro Tem, Councilman Lander
nominating Councilman Cannon and Councilman Walker nominating Councilman
Kloesel. Mayor Walker then called for the vote on the two nominees and
the results follow:
Ted Kloesel: Walker, Kloesel, and Mayor Walker
Allen Cannon: Lander, Stasney, McWilliams and Cannon
Ferry Road - Dust Problem
Councilman Kloesel requested the Administration to check out a dus
problem which presently exists on Ferry Road, also, the possibility of
widening the road.
Minutes. Julv 20, 1971
5047
fi e. 6
Ordinance - Amending Electrical Code - Master Electricians Conduit
All Commercial Buildings
Acting City Attorney DeHart introduced and read an ordinance
amending the city's electrical code requiring all Master Electricians
applying for permits for the use of electrical contractors to be
associated with the firm for whom he is applying and requiring conduit
in all commercial buildings rather than in the present practice of
requiring /8811" A construction of commercial buildings located within
the City's fire zones. Councilman Kloesel moved to adopt the ordinance
as read. Councilman Walker seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel, Walker, Lander, Stasney, Cannon
and McWilliams
Mayor Walker
Nays: None
The caption of the ordinance follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 1108
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY
OF BAYTOWN; THE ELECTRICAL CODE CHAPTER 11, SECTION 11 -48
AND 11 -73, SUBSECTION 18 ADDING ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
FOR MASTER ELECTRICIANS TO OBTAIN PERMITS AND INCLUDING
ALL COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS IN REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN
SUBSECTION 18 OF SECTION 11 -48; REPEALING ORDINANCES
INCONSISTENT HEREWITH.
Municipal Court Committee - Procedure Appointing Municipal Judge
Councilman Kloesel, Chairman of the Municipal Court Committee,
proposed that the present Committee handle all applications for the
Municipal Court Judge. interested applicants to file their application
with the City Clerk during the next 30 -day period and at the end of
the period the Committee interview the applicants and make a recommendation
to the Council prior to September 1. Neel Richardson, the present
Municipal Court Judge who has been hired to fill the vacancy of the
City Atto??,�ey's position, stated that he felt there would be some
conflict/tne same person should serve as City Attorney and Municipal
Coutt Judge at the same time,in that by Charter and State Law the
,
City Attorney has the duty and obligation to prosecute all cases that
are pending in the Court. He is presently trying to clear up some
cases in his law practice before assuming the duties of the City Attorney.
However, he will work with the Council in any manner it may choose.
Councilman Stasney stated that he felt that the Council should act on
the appointment of a municipal Judge at the first meeting in August.
Councilman Kloesel then moved to authorize the municipal Court Committee
to receive applicants for the position of Municipal Court Judge and bring
a recommendation to the council within a 30 -day period. Councilman
Cannon seconded the motion. He then moved to amend the motion to close
the acceptance of applications two weeks from tonight or the first meeting
in August, Councilman Lender seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel, Walker, Lander, Stasney, Cannon and
McWilliams
Mayor Walker
Nays: None
The Mayor then called for the vote on the original motion as amended
following no further discussion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel, Walker, Lander, Stasney, Cannon and
McWilliams
Nays: None
Councilman Walker was appointed as the third member of the Municipal
Court Committee to serve with Councilmen Kloesel and Cannon in the appraisal
of applicants for the Municipal Court Judge position.
fi e. 6
t
504$ Minutes, July 20, 1971
Councilman Kloesel stated that for clarification the applicant did not have
to be a licensed attorney as had been previously stated in the newspaper. Councilman
McWilliams was of the opinion that a prerequisite for the Municipal Court Judge
is that he be a licensed attorney and moved to instruct the Committee to screen all
applicants who are not licensed attorneys from this position. Councilman
Lander seconded the motion. Following some further discussion, the Mayor
called the vote and the results follow:
Ayes: Councilman Lander and McWilliams
Nays: Councilmen Kloesel, Walker, Stasney and Cannon
Mayor Walker
Wrecker Service Committee -- Councilman Lander
Councilman Lander, Chairman of the Wrecker Administrative asked the
Council to defer action on the proposed revisions to the Wrecker Ordinance
after he learned that one of the proposed revisions was in conflict with the
wrecker operator's need.
Rtasney - Named Baytown's Representative Houston - Galveston Executive Committee
Councilman Kloesel moved to name Councilman Stasney as Baytown's representative
on the Houston - Galveston Area Council Executive Committee. Councilman
Cannon seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: councilmen Walker, Kloesel, Lander, Stasney, Cannon and McWilliams
Mayor Walker
Nays: None
Study Bicycle Lanes Throughout City
I
Councilman Kloesel asked the Administration to give some study and be
prepared to make some recommendations for the designation of bicycle lanes
by the latter part of August, for the safety of bicycle riders across Baytown.
The Parks Director is looking at lanes for recreational purposes but some
thought should be given to the educational aspect since the new regulations
require bicycles to be operated as near the right side of the read as possible.
Appointments to Planning Commission Approved
Councilman McWilliams moved to approve the recommendation of Mayor
Walker and reappoint Richard Park, Righard King, Mack Holland and Alton Laird
to the Planning Commission for another term and Wayne Hanson and Robert
Frysinger to fill the two vacancies created by the adoption of a recent
ordinance increasing the Planning Commission by two. Councilman Stasney seconded
the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel, Walker, Lander, Stasney, Cannon and McWilliams
Mayor Walker
Nays: None
-Advertise Bids - Contract No. 1 Water Mains
Councilman waIX*r- -coved to instruct A. J. Busch, Consulting Engineer
to advertise for bids to be received August 10 on water main extensions from
the northwest to south and southeast section of the city and included in
the bond program. Councilman Lander seconded the motion. The vote follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel ,Walker,Lander,Stasney,Cannon & McWilliams
Mayor Walker
Nays: None
Adjourn
There being no further bus -ness to come before the Council, Councilman
Kloesel moved and Councilman Cannon seconded that the meeting adjourn. The ayes
were unanimous and the Mayor declared the meeting adjourne
Edna Oliver, City. Clerx
C. Glen Walker, Mayor
_ R+