Loading...
1970 12 03 CC Minutess� MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN December 3, 1970 The City Council of the City of Baytown, Texas, met in regular session on Thursday, December 3, 1970 at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Room of the Baytown City Hall with the following members in attendance: Ted Kloesel David Evans Don M. Hullum Leonard W. Stasney Allen Cannon Lamar Kelley C. Glen Walker D. R. Voelkel Howard F. Northcutt W. R. Laughlin Absent Edna Oliver Councilman Councilman. Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Mayor City Manager Administrative Assistant City Attorney City Clerk The Mayor called the meeting to order and the Invocation was offered. He then called for consideration of minutes for regular meeting of November 18. Councilman Kelley moved to approve the minutes as sub- mitted in written form. Councilman Kloesel seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel, Evans, Hullum, Stasney, Cannon and _Kelley, Mayor Walker Nays: None Reconsidered Ordinance No. lfdS amending Chapter 7, Buildings -Code of Ordinances Mr. Laughlin, City Attorney, presented Ordinance No. 1050 to the Council for consideration. He stated that the City had adopted the 1965 edition of the Southern Standard Building Code, but had never adopted the 1969 edition which allows three story residential structures. Friendswood Development being developed by Tipco plans some limited three story dwellings which will cause no problems since the City is considering density standards. Mr. Stasney stated that he thought this ordinance was a bit premature since we do not have density standards and passage of this ordinance would lend to slum conditions. Councilman Stasney moved that an exception.:be made for Tipco, Rollingbrook Project in the Building of three story units on an individual basis. This motion was seconded by Councilman Hullum. Mayor Walker asked if there was any discussion concerning this motion; then, Mr. Wilhite was questioned about density standards and Mr. Laughlin was asked if the City would be under any obligation if the exception was granted to Tipco. Mr. Laughlin stated that the City would be under no obligation except to treat each request fairly. After the discussion ended, the Mayor asked that the Council vote on the motion. The vote followsc Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel, Evans, Hullum, Stasney, Cannon and Kelley Mayor Walker Nays: None Ordinance No. 1050 - Telephone Rates Mr. Laughline presented Ordinance No. 1050 to the Council for con- sideration. This ordinance would amend our present rate ordinance and adopt the Texas Tariff Agreement as it presently reads; also, it would give the City the opportunity to consider any new miscellaneous services and charges, and the City the opportunity to consider any new miscellaneous services and charges, and the Council 90 days in advance new proposed rates for miscellaneous services and charges, and the Council would have 30 days after which to have the company show cause why these charges should be instituted; in which case the City would have an after the fact type regulation and before the charges become effective. 7 Minutes, December 3, 1970 4881 Adopting the Tariff Agreement would eliminate the amending of the ordinance each time there was a new piece of equipment that might be in conflict with the existing ordinance. After the ordinance itself was discussed, the question of holding a public hearing was raised. Mr. Laughlin stated that there was no legal reason to hold a public hearing; however, Councilman Stasney stated that he felt a public hearing should be held to give the citizens an opportunity to express themselves. Justification for the rate hearing being citizens will be charged additional fees for equipment they already have. Councilman Stasney moved that action be tabled concerning Ordinance No. 1050 and a public hearing w be held December 15, 1970 at 7 :00 p.m. Councilman Evans seconded the motion. No vote was taken at this time due to the fact that Mr. Chappel requested that he be permitted to address the Council. Mr. Chappel stated that the key element to be considered upon the part of the telephone company was whether or not they could increase rates. He stated that the company did not wish to break the law; however, if the Council did not take action bills would be issued with increased rates. The company's main justification was the fact that rates had not been increased since 1949 for the services under discussion. Hates are reasonable and not discriminatory. Equipment is not the only factor to consider, installation is part of the cost to the company. According to Mr. Chappel there is no way to Justify these charges due to the fact there is too much equipment, man- power, time etc. involve. The point was made that the public's reaction to this new increase was that they had not asked for anything but was being charged irregardless. Mr. Chappel was asked how these rates were decided. ge rate making department combine all factors, make calculations, and produce what they consider a reasonable cost for service. Mr. Chappel stated that the telephone company needed the ordinance up -dated to make charging more expedient and practical (Package Deal) , rather than itemizing different charges. Some charges will be lowered due to package billing. Mr. Laughlin stated that the City Secretary will have a copy of the Texas Tariff Agreement that has miscellaneous charges and the City will keep up -dated listings of all changes to it; also, the Tariff Agreement will be made part of the Code of Ordinances by reference. At the last Council meeting the Council was under the impression that there would be no rate change -now a rate charge is indicated. Mr. Laughlin clarified this point by stating that rates will not go up on any phone until sometime in 1972; unless this ordinance is not approved, than the company will be forced to ask for a rate increase. Mr. Laughlin then explained the circumstances and reasons for adopting the 1965 rate ordinance and recommended that the Council take action to avoid any confrontation with the Company. He then requested that if the Council chose not to take action that the company would cooperate with the City until such time as the matter could be cleared up. More discussion followed and Councilman Kelley moved to end de- bate. Councilman Stasney seconded the motion. .. Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel, Evans, Hull=, Stasney, Cannon and Kelley Mayor Walker Nays: None The Mayor then stated that the previous question motion made by David Evans and seconded by Leonard Stasney was that Ordinance 1050 be tabled until next regular meeting and a public hearing be set for 7:00 p, m. at that time. Ayes: Councilmen Stasney and Hullum Nays: Councilmen Kloesel, Evans, Cannon, and Kelley Mayor Walker Councilman Kelley then moved that Ordinance No. 1050 be adopted. This al was seconded by Councilman Allen Cannon; however, at this time Councilman Stasney moved that the current residential base rate be held until 12/31/72 and this should be stated in the ordinance. Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel, Evans, Hull=, Stasney, Cannon and Kelley Mayor Walker Nays: None After some discussion, the Mayor called for a vote adopting Ordinance No. 1050 as amended freezing residential base rate until 12/31/72. Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel, Evans, Hull=, Stasney, Cannon and Kelley Mayor Walker 488 2 Minutes, December 3, 1970 Mr. Laughlin requested that Mr. Chappel check with the company concerning the residential base rate date of 12/31/72. The caption of the Ordinance follows: ORDINANCE NO. 1050 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 753 TO CLARIFY THE PROCEDURE FOR ADMINISTERING CHANGES IN MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE TARIFFS OF GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF THE SOUTHWEST; PROVIDING THAT NO CHANGE SHALL BE MADE IN BASIC SERVICE RATES UNTIL 1972; REPEALING ORDINANCES INCON- SISTENT HEREWITH; CONTAINING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Extension -Ward Road Across Cedar Bayou Mr. Ross Wilhite was asked to give a report of his findings and re& commendations. Mr. Wilhite stated that there is an apartment complex under con- sideration at the dead end of Ward Road and the Council should consider rather to push for a crossing of Cedar Bayou at this point or veto the possibility. The property on the east side belongs to C.-R..Hayden who does not favor a crossing through his property. The Texas Highway Department was contacted; although the district engineer was not available, the'chief design engineer stated he felt the highway department would not be able to limit traffic to autos only. At this point Mr. Wilhite suggested that he favored obtaining a right- of-way for this crossing while the land was acreage. At the bridge session some indication was made that the crossing to the north was in jeopardy due to the fact that Mobay was opposed to the idea. No crossing will be built until the need arises ; how- ever, at some date in the future the need will be evident. It was the understand- ing of the Council that the developer had agreed to dedicate 130 feet of right - of -way at no cost to the City; however, Mr. Wilhite indicated that the developer was willing to set his buildings back making space for a right -of -way, but this did not necessarily mean that he was giving a right-of-way..-Mr. Laughlin pointed out that the City could ask for a certain amount of right -of -way. At this time Mr. Wilhite some estimated figures as to number of square feet City would have to purchase and the value. The City would have to purchase 47,600 square feet @ Ij $14,280 @ $ .30 per square foot; $23,800 @ $ .50 per square foot. Due to poss- ibility of truck traffic through a residential area, Councilman Kloesel moved that the request for crossing at this site be rejected. Councilman Stasney seconded the motion. No action was taken at this time due to more discussion. Councilman Hullum indicated need to select at least three crossings and he did not wish to start omitting each one. He felt that the Council was obligated to look at this situation and select an area for future use. Further discussion followed in which the members of the Council and a citizen expressed a desire to keep truck traffic from residential areas and from downtown Baytown. The Mayor called for a vote. Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel, Evens, Hullum, Stasney, and Kelley Nays: Councilman Cannon and Mayor Walker Ordinance No. 1051 - Restricting parking on portions of Ward Road and West Main Street Mr. Laughlin read the ordinance that the Traffic Committee had re- commended. The committee recommends that Ward Road from North Main to Kilgore be restricted from parking at all times except for that area on North side of Ward Road between Houston Street and North Main prohibiting parking between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. This ordinance to be adopted pursuant to a provision of City Code stated Council will designate from time to time no- parking areas and this would direct the police department to in- stall and sign the areas appropriately. Councilman Kloesel moved that the ordinance be adopted as presented. This was seconded by Councilman Cannon. How- ever, attention was brought to the fact that the Ordinance should also include a no- parking area on West Main from Lee Drive to the bridge crossing Goose Creek; therefore, the motion was amended to include this paragraph. Discussion followed concerning establishing no- parking areas on other streets in the City and enforcing the law concerning no- parking and speeding on residential streets. The vote on the ordinance as read including no- parking areas on Ward Road and West Main follows: Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel, Evans, Hullum, Stasney, Cannon, and Kelley Mayor Walker Nays: None 4883 Minutes. December 3. 1970 The caption of the ordinance follows: ORDINANCE NO. 1051 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS, DESIGNATING CERTAIN AREAS AS NO- PARKING ZONES AS PROVIDED BY SECTION 16 -122 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE AND THE PUBLICATION HEREOF. Award Bid Installation of Traffic Equipment -Bowie Drive 6 Highway 146 Mr. Voelkel gave the bid summary which indicated that Vornsand Enterprises had the low bid of $3,640 in 10 working days and Pfeiffer Gambrell Inc, was second with a bid of .$4,890 in 10 working days; therefore, the Administration recommended that Vornsand Enterprises. be awarded the contract. Councilman Evans moved to accept the recommended the recommendation of the Administration and the motion was seconded by Councilman Hullum. The vote follows: Ayes: Councilmen Evans, Hullum, Stasney, Cannon, and Kelley Mayor Walker Nays: Councilman Kloesel After the vote, Councilman Stasney asked that the Traffic committee consider activating the traffic Lights already installed at the intersection of Highway 146 and Ward Road with left hand turning signals; however, at the present time there is no provision for left hand signals. Mr. Voelkel commented that he had asked Mr. Laughlin to investigate the possibility of additional right -of -way; also he had spoke to Mr. Busch and it is possible to widen the street within the present right- of-way but the curb would be within the right - of-way line. Mr. Stasney asked why not install left turn signals. Mr. Voelkel agreed that this possibility could be carried out, but the highway department would have the final decision since they would tell the City rather or not the signals can be installed. The problem will be given to the Traffic Committee for study. _ Mr. Connerton- Regarding Local News Coverage Mr. Carl Connerton appeared before the Council, first, to ask the procedure for being placed on the agenda. In order to be placed on the agenda, one may call the City Clerk's office or the City Manager's office asking to be placed on the agenda and give the subject matter to be discussed. Some matters are not Council but Administrative; however, if the individual is not totally satisfied he is allowed to present his problem to the Council. It is possible to appear before the Council without even requesting to do so before hand. After this question was clarified, Mr. Connerton read the license renewal application of KWBA to the Federal Communications Commission and suggested vast improvement in KWBA operations. He requested that the Council remove the Police Department from the news reporting business and issue a formal invitation to KWBA to be present at the Council meetings. Councilman Stasney moved that the matter be referred to the Administration. This motion was seconded by Councilman Hullum. Discussion followed as to hvv the Administration should take care of the situation and the fact that the Council meeting was a public meeting and it is State law that anyone may attend. Then, Councilman Stasney moved previous question which was seconded, and the vote was taken on the original motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel, Evans, Hullum, Stasney, and Kelley Mayor Walker Nays: Councilman Cannon Mr. Moak - Quality of City's Water Mr. Moak appeared before the Council to express the concern of a number of citizens having to do with the poor quality of Baytown's water supply. They had reached this conclusion from lab analysis of water from homes in Baytown, condition of pipes, and a recent newspaper article. These citizens would like to know just what they can expect of the Council in the way of correcting the problem. Mr. Morton, the City engineer was asked if he could enlighten the Council. This is the same problem that the City has faced in other sections of City, but according to his knowledge there has been no problem with corrosion of water pipes in the older sections of the City. Mr. Morton stated he did not know had to define the problem .or the solution at the present time. When the City goes to surface water the pro- 4884 Minutes, December 13, 1970 blem will be solved, but this will not be effected for 5 -10 years. Wells in the southeast part of town have a higher mineral content and total solids exceed re- commended maximum, but we do not have an alternate source of water. The question was asked what is the cause of corrosion in some areas and not in others. The problem is prevalent all over town in spots. An explanation was given as follows: Old pipe has calcium deposited which protects it from errosion and the new pipe does not ; although, the deposit will eventually be dissolved and the people in older sections of town will have same problem. This water causes trouble in pipes, appliances, etc. anything it comes into contact with regularly. Mr. Walter Homan suggested that the water rates be raised so the City could go to surface water. The corrosiveness of the water was discussed. Mr. Joe Aylor stated that in the apartment complexes the action was arrested by introducing sodium silicon into the - water. The City does introduce some chemical into the water to eliminate rusting; however, since we still have rusty water this hasn't really improved the water. Mr. Clarence Johnson of the Water Quality Control Board was questioned and he stated that the Chemical introduced into the water system to cure the iron problem was not the same thing as what was being discussed at present. Some research on the subject revealed that the dissolved solvent present in Baytown's water is 1,053; the city of Houston Health Department does not have anything over 100 and the Textbook by Best recommends a maximum of 500. The reason the City is unable to give relief to the area is that water lines are not looped but if the lines are looped, then we can push for water main up Decker into that area and drill two or more additional wells and feed water in that direction. This is possible and the lines would have to be looped to bring in water from the southwest section of town even if the City goes to surface water. This is planned in the first phase of the Bond Program but, until the water system is looped so that the City can move water, we must continue to use wells. Time estimate on looping is next_summer__but bonds must be sold first. During last bond issue part of a contract was withheld to com- plete a loop was the opinion of Councilman Stasney, but Mr. Voelkel stated this was a 16" transmission main along Decker Drive which will eventually curve to the east in the 201 right- of-way line. The City has contacted the district office of the Texas State Highway Department, but this office must obtain per- mission from Austin to proceed with acquisition of right-of -way due-to the fact that this is partially sponsored by federal funds. The Federal govern- ment will not release funds until the final design is presented; therefore, if Austin gives its approval the project will be continued hoping the Fed- eral government will release the funds when it is completed. At this point, Mr.- Kloesel made a motion that the matter be referred to the Administration with the intent that the Administration seek out professional advice, phase out thetwo wells, obtain the cost estimate and time of developing two add- itional wells to include looping. There was not second at this time. The Mayor suggested setting a meeting to hear recommendations. Mr. Johnny Busch, Consulting Engineer, has been studying the problem and stated that he was prepared to give a report which would allow the phasing out of these wellt'- that have highly mineralized water. He would recommend keeping wells only on stand by conditions in case of fire. Mr. Busch will be heard Thursday night 7:00 p.m. Mr. Busch continued saying as chloride content of.water goes up the ability of water to conduct increases when this increases the effect of electrolysis increases. The reason pipes do not last-is miner- alization of water and poor quality of pipe; also conductivity of soil in which pipe is laid. Phasing out wells would be most beneficial to having better water. The State Health Department's maximum of total dissolved solids is 1,000 parts per million and 250 part per million total chloride. The East James well which services Plumwood is at present 1,082 part per million chloride. The northwestern part of town ranges only about 500 parts per million total dissolved solids and 125 part per million chloride. This part of town has better water and this has been constant for appro- ximately 10 years. Mr. Kloesel again made the motion to direct the Ad- ministration to seek out professional advice and to report to the Council if possible next Thursday. Mr. Hullum seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel, Evans, Hullum, Stasney, Cannon, and Kelley Mayor Walker Nays: None 4885 Minutes. December 3. 1970 More discussion followed concerning copper tubing and plastic pipe in place of galvanized pipe; also the general health of the citizens drinking poor quality water; however, no further action was taken. Authorize City Attorney to Begin Preliminary Study a Rough Draft of a Utility District - Council to Study Council to consider authorizing the City Attorney to begin pre - liminary study and rough draft of a utility district in order to allow sufficient time for Council to study before presenting same to the leg- islature. Councilman Hullum made the motion to authorize City Attorney to proceed and Councilman Evans seconded the motion. Ayes: Councilmen Evans, Hullum, Stasney, Cannon, and Kelley Mayor Walker Nays: Councilman Kloesel The Mayor read the Resolution No. 302 which presents the back- ground on the county's commitment on Baker Road and requests immediate designation of those committed funds for the City's use. Councilman Stasney moved to adopt the Resolution and Councilman Hullum seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Councilmen Klosel, Evans, Hullum, Stasney, and Kelley. Mayor Walker Nays: None The Caption follows: r RESOLUTION NO. 302-,? I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN FORM- ALLY REQUESTING COUNTY COMMISSIONER V. V. RAMSEY TO CAUSE THE COMMISSIONER'S COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY TO EARMARK MONEY PRE- VIOUSLY COMMITTED TO ASSURE THE IMPROVEMENT OF BAKER ROAD; AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THIS RESOLUTION AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO FOINARD A CERTIFIED COPY OF SAME TO COUNTY COMMISSIONER V. V. RAMESY. Requirements- Off - Street Parking - Discussed Traffic Council recommended preparation of an off -street parking ordinance to be prepared by the City Attorney. Mr. Ross Wilhite, City Planner, discussed recommendations with Council. If density standards are adopted then the two famity and multiply family dwelling would apply, but if density standards are not adopted the apartment parking will remain as is. This ordinance will apply only to new construction. There are two main divisions in this ordinance: 1. Parking requirements for new buildings off street 2. Curb cut standards (how much curb can be laid at one time) The imfonmation given to the Council is very similiar to the City of Hous- ton off - street parking ordinance and copies of this ordinance will be available by next Thursday. The long range effect of the ordinance is that it will move some cars off the street. Mr. Voelkel noted that there was not a definition of off - street parking. He suggested that the turning movements should be off - street. Mr. Wilhite suggested that 100 feet of curb allowed back out type parking; however, it also allows motorists to drive into parking area at higher rate of speed. In some areas now when the auto is parked the back end is on edge of pavement and one must back at least 10 feet into moving lane before one can see in both directions, this plan would give more sight distance. Mr. Cannon was asked if he would like to make a motion, however, he declined since he felt that at this time the Council was unable to give Mr. Laughlin the necessary guide line to prepare an ordinance. Mr. Wilhite stated that he felt that pro- 4886 Minutes, December 3, 1970 vision should be made in the ordinance for the small lots which could come up short of necessary requirements, such as a review board to re- view such cases. Mr. Wilhite and Mr. Voelkel were asked to recommendations together and present them to Council next Thursday, December 10. * Councilman David Evans leaves meeting. Fire Lane Easements- Multiple Dwelling Unit - Density Standards for Sub- divisions & Multiple Dwelling Unit Developments Fire lane easement effects apartments. The Planning Commission met and recommended unanimously density of 20 dwelling units to the acre in other words the ordinance should be changed to include this density standard. This would be tract density which does not include abutting streets in the acreage. FHA prefers this standard but will accept higher density. This ordinance will promote higher quality apartment develop- ments and will ease sewer and water problems. This ordinance will not be of advantage or disadvantage to any particular developer. At the present time apartment complexes average 24 units to the acre. Mr. Lammers in- dicated that at some time in the future the City would have to consider a change in density to ground area to cover high rise building. The council had some discussion and as a first step setting up density stand- ards now is a good step. There should be an ordinance establishing 8 units to the acre for Town House Apts. and a change in the Mobile Home Ordinance limiting 7 units to the acre which is FHA standard. A motion was made by Mr. Stasney to authorize the City Attorney'•- to prepare the necessary ordinances. The motion was seconded by Mr. Kloesel. The vote follows: Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel, Hullum, Stasney, Cannon, and Kelley Mayor Walker Nays: None Council and Administrative Communications Tabled. Motion made by Councilman Stasney and seconded by Councilman Kloesel. Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel, Hullum, Stasney, Cannon, and Kelley Mayor Walker Nays: None Authorize City Attorney to Initiate Action Against Beach City's Anne- xation Within Baytown's Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Mr. Laughlin was asked to use the most economical and fairest way possible to initiate action against the proposed Beach City annexation with the City of Baytown's extraterritorial jurisdiction. Councilman Kloesel seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel, Hullum, Stasney, Cannon, and Kelley Mayor Walker Nays: None Volunteer Fireman- Clear Title to Fireman's Hall The volunteer fireman were inquiring about getting a clear title to the Volunteer Fireman's Hall, and right to use City right-of-way. Mr. Laughlin stated that the right-of-way problem could easily be solved in that the City would issue a license for use of the right- of�-aay inde- finitely, and the clear title would be issue within 24 hours after field notes describing the property were received. Old Water Tower - Maryland Street Old water tower on Maryland Street hazard. Administration to sew about having it removed. 4887 Minutes. December 3. 1970 Amend Sewer Ordinance — /C -;,- The cost of temporary improvement is estimated to be $50 per dwelling unit as being estimated cost of providing 50,000 gallon treat- ment plan on temporary basis. An amendment to the sewer system portion of the Utilities Chapter Code of ordinances would cover this temporary improvement cost. Section 31 -67 covers sewer tap fees. Section 31 -68 labels fee. Swelling units $50 sewer tap; non dwelling unit average 250 gallons effluent per day divide that into total anticipated discharge, multiply by $50 to get comparable level. Section 31 -69 Time fees go into effect. To build resident in existing subdivision pay at time of paying sewer tap fee; platted subdivision look at plat multiply $50 times number of units, pay at time Planning Commission approves plat. Effective Date: As far as subdivisions or projects which have not been approved or build- ing permit issued, the effective date is when application is made. On unplatted land where the tap fee has not been paid, the effective date - is upon application also. Councilman Stasney moved to amend ordinanc2. Councilman Hullum seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Hullum, Stasney, Cannon and Kelley Mayor Walker Nays: Councilman Kloesel Mr. Voelkel at this point requested that the Council refer to the "Patrol Women" as "School Patrol" because "Patrol Women" is a Civil Service Class- ification. Councilman Cannon moved that the clarification be made. Councilman Stasney seconded the motion. Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel, Hullum, Stasney, Cannon, and Kelley Mayor Walker Nays: None Councilman Cannon moved that a meeting of the Baytown City Council be held Thursday, December 10, 1970 at 6:30 p.m. Councilman Kloesel seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Councilmen Kloesel, Hullum, Stasney, Cannon, and Kelley Mayor Walker Nays: None Adjourn There being no further business to come before the Council, the motion was made and seconded that the meeting adjourn. The ayes were unanimous and the Mayor declared the meeting adjourned. 1 , 6 d� o� Apps C. G� Waalker, Mayor William R. Laughlin, City Atto nay �Iuwa"' 'Vicutmp Aaminisrra�ye Assistant