Loading...
1966 08 11 CC Minutes�1 4185 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN August 11, 1%6 The City Council of the City of Baytown, Texas, met in regular session on Thurs- day, August 11, 1966 at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Room of the Baytown City Hall with the following members in attendance: Don M. Hullum A. M. Braswell Clem M. Massey Albert Fanestiel Raymond T. Donnelly Seaborn Cravey Councilman Councilman Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilman Councilman Mayor Fritz Lanham City Manager George Chandler City Attorney Edna Oliver City Clerk Absent: Patrick Ball Councilman The Mayor called the meeting to order, the Invocation was offered, afterwhich the Mayor called for the minutes of the special meetings of July 27, August 1, August 2, 1%6 and the regular meeting of July 28, 1966. One or two minor corrections were made to the August 1st minutes, then Councilman Donnelly moved to approve the minutes, including the corrections, as submitted in written form. Councilman Massey seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Councilmen Massey, Hullum. Braswell, Fanestiel and Donnelly. Mayor Cravey Nays: None Petition - E. L. Gunn - Residents of Gravwood Mr. E. L. Gunn, spokesman for residents of Graywood subdivision, submitted a petition requesting that the present Felton Street access to the parking lot of the K -Mart Shopping Center be permanently closed to automobile traffic and that this become effective upon completion of the current Memorial Drive -Park Street project. The petition listed eight reasons for the request, namely: (1) Street not designed to carry such heavy volume of traffic; (2) the width of the street; (3) small children and school route; (4) hazard in parking in front of own homes because of width of street; (5) entrance and exit of family automobiles very hazardous because of traffic; (6) the design of the Felton Street access to the K -Mart lot is conducive to accidents; (7) Closing the narrow street outlet will not materially reduce access to the K -Mart parking lot; and (8) cbsing Felton Street will reduce the probability of acci- dents within the K -Mart lot and the Williams - Felton intersection. The Council discussed the contents of the petitions with Mr. Gunn and it was pointed out that there may be some legal impediment to such a request; this would have to be checked into by the City Attorney. Other phases were discussed; afterwhich Councilman Braswell moved to accept the petition; to refer the request to-the Traffic Committee for study, a sketch.of the ,layout of the traffic flow, to discuss the effect of-such closing with K -Mart management and report its finding to the Council with a recommendation for its considerance. Councilman Donnelly seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Councilmen Massey, Hullum, Braswell. Fanestiel and Donnelly. Mayor Cravey Nays: None 4186 Public Hearing - Annexation of Additional Strips along FM Road 2354 and Tri -City Beach Rd. Mayor Cravey opened the public hearing upon the proposed annexation of an additional ten -foot strip along FM Road 2354 and Tri -City Beach Road. No one in the audience offered a question and Mayor Cravey declared the hearing closed after repeating his statement on the purpose of the public hearing upon the afrementioned strips. Annexation Ordinance - FM Road 1942 and Bohemian Hall Road - First Reading Councilman Braswell moved to adopt an ordinance..under first reading, upon the annexation of ten -foot strips along FM Road 1942 and along the.Bohemian Hall Raod, Councilman Massey seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Councilmen Massey, Hullum, Braswell. Fanestiel and Donnelly. Mayan Cravey Nays: None The caption of the ordinance follows: ORDINANCE NO. 807 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXTENSION OF CERTAIN BOUNDARY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS, AND THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY CONSISTING OF 4.8 ACRES OF LAND, WHICH SAID TERRITORY LIES ADJACENT TO AND ADJOINS THE.PRESENT BOUNDARY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS. Report Lowell Lammers. Architect - Construction City Hall and Community Building Lowell Lammers, Architect, gave a construction report upon the.progress being made by the contractor on the construction of the City Hall and Community Building. In the excavation for the lower level, the soil at the site was found:to be uniform In its texture to a considerable depth and prompted the Engineers to request and do additional bearing testing work on the soil. The McClellan Engineering Company now recommends a safe bearing area for soil at 6000 lbs per square foot. In line with this recommended safe bearing area, the Architect asked for permission to issue Change Order No. 1 to the contract for changes to the foundation structures as recommended by Pace Company Engineers raising the grade of the footing bearing and slightly reducing the bearing area, changes in the drilling of the bell holes showing a total net credit for this change of $1,725.30. After some discussion, Councilman Braswell moved on the basis of the recommendation of the consultants that the Architect has hired, that:the City reduce the depths of-footings and take the credit of $1.725.30. Councilman Massey seconded the,motion., The Vote follows: Ayes: Councilmen Massey, Hullum, Braswell. Fanestiel and Donnelly. Nays: Mayor Cravey The second Change Order recommended by the Architect was in the;br.ick for the walls and exposed interior brick walls of the building. His recommendation stipulated a Texsize Acapulco brown glazed brick for the walls and exposed interior walls and the brick for the columns be changed to a Texsize brick in a light Cream - White. The proposed glazed brick will retain its beauty for the life of the building and will never need sand blasting, acid etching, or other cleaning procedures to maintain its new appearance. Its glazed surface is impervious to water and moisture penetration. The cost for this change amounts to $2,100.06. After some discussioq.,Councilmon Fanestiel moved to accept the recommendation of the Architect and approved,the,Change Order No. 2, in reference to the glazed brick of Acapulco brown for the walls and in- terior walls. Councilman Braswell seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Councilmen Hullum. Fanestiel and Braswell Mayor Cravey Nays: Councilmen Donnelly and Massey Transfer - Resolution Councilman Massey moved to adopt a resolution transferring $400.00 to the Police Budget to purchase Instructor's Kit for Drivers Training Program. Councilman 4187 Minutes Baytown City Council August 11, 1966 Fanestiel seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Councilmen Massey, Hullum, Braswell, Fanestiel and Donnelly. Mayor Cravey Nays: None The caption of the resolution follows: RESOLUTION NO. 116 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO TRANSFER FOUR HUNDRED ($400.00) DOLLARS FROM THE GENERAL FUND CONTINGENCY TO BUDGET ACCOUNT 200 -2 -1 ** Mayor Cravey excused from the meeting. Discuss - Issuance of- Warrants for Sewer System Improvements At a special meeting August 2nd, the Council discussed, with Tom Masterson, the possibility of issuing time warrants, if necessary, to finance a portion of the sanitary sewer improvements. No definite action was taken at the meeting, it was to be resumed at this regular meeting. City Manager Lanham reported that at this time, based on the estimated cost of the proposed sanitary sewer improvements and, based on the amount of money we presently have in hand and committed, the City will have a $335,000.00 deficit. Application has been made for $136,000 other Fed- eral funds which it is possible the City may get, but this will leave $200,000 short of the goal. A difference may be realized after the bids are taken and some funds may be available from the budget but, if the Council is willing to state at this time that, if necessary, warrants would be issued the Administration could authorize the engineers to-proceed with plans and specifications for all of the proposed improvements. Councilman Donnelly moved to express our intention to issue warrants, if necessary, to complete the proposed sanitary sewer program. Councilman Hullum proposed going back to the voters for an expression if the City was going to go in debt $325,000.00. The Council has made changes in plans, he favored the new plant but was reluctant to assume the deficit shown without an expression from the people. Mayor Pro Tem Braswell favored the Council moving ahead with the present program and others pointed out the escalation rate the City may be faced with if it does not proceed with the engineering and letting of contracts. Councilman Hullum was of the opinion that the Council has now come to the point of deciding if the Woodlawn and Cedar Bayou plants will be closed down and a new plant built elsewhere and then take action on the warrants. Other relating features were discussed such as trunk lines, force main, etc., after - which Councilman Massey seconded the motion of C ouncilman Donnelly. The vote follows: Ayes: Councilmen Massey, Fanestiel and Donnelly Mayor Pro Tem Braswell Nays: Councilman Hullum E. 0. Cambern - General Telephone Company - Request for Easement The Council received a request from E. 0. Cambern, General Telephone Company, for an extension of an easement along the south side of Roseland Park to Cedar Bayou and cross at this point to serve the U. S. Steel complex in Chambers County. The company presently has a joint construction lead, with the Houston Light & Power Company, serving the Roseland Park attendant's house. His request is for an extension from this point. He explained that this is an immediate temporary route, setting four poles for the Company is studying the possibility of submerging; also the possibility of taking conduit completely over into the Steel complex. This immediate extension will provide 300 private telephones. Councilman Donnelly moved to grant the easement, with the understanding that the Company will disturb as few tree limbs as possible during the setting of the poles and installation of cable. Councilman Fanestiel seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Councilmen Massey, Hullum, Fanestiel and Donnelly. • Mayor Pro Tem Braswell Nays: None 4188 Minutes Baytown City Council August 11, 1966 Second Request - Mr. Lomax - Relocate Strom Sewer Inlet The Council, once again, reviewed the request of Douglas Lomax for the relocating of a storm sewer inlet by the City, at its expense, at the corner of Kipling and Viking. The Council had taken action upon this request at the July 14th meeting but Mr. Lomax was not present; he was present at this meeting to discuss the matter again. The problem was reviewed in detail by Mr. Lomax and Councilman Donnelly pointed out that the Council had already agreed that the inlet could be moved, even offering the engineering services of the City Engineer, but declined to share in the cost since the storm sewer inlet was in place at the time of purchase and the City was not at fault, but the person designing the location of the structure on the lot. Mayor Pro Tem Braswell agreed the entire problem was a series of errors, but,the City may be at fault somewhat in the location of the catch basin because it is not.as shown on the plans thus making the responsibility of modification costs to be jointly shared. Councilman Donnelly contended that any modifications costs should be borne by the property owner. the City offering the services of the City Engineerinn planning , the relocation in order for the drainage to be effective. After a further lengthy discussion, Councilman Donnelly moved to lend the assistance of the City Engineer to work with and cooperate the relocation of the storm sewer inlet or the installa- tion of a grate but the work to be done at the property owner's expense.. Councilman Massey seconded the motion. The vote follows:, Ayes: Councilmen Massey. Hullum, Fanestiel and Donnelly.. Nays: Mayor.Pro Tem Braswell Discuss Paving Daniel Street - Oak Addition At the July 28th meeting, the City Manager was instructed to contact aq official of Missouri - Pacific RR to see if the Company would be willing to.,participate in the costs of improving Daniel.Street as a petition has been..presegted,.bearing the major portion of property -owner signatures requesting this improvement. He contac4ed Mr. J. A. Austin. Houston Vice- President and the engineering department and they have agreed to pay the total cost.of the section of the street that is entirely on their property and will pay for paving between their tracks and two feet on each side on the section that is located within the dedicated street. The estimated cost of the total project if $19,680.00, the railroad company's portion being between $10,000 and $11,000, under these terms. It was his recommendation that the engineer be instructed to proceed with plans on the street and that an initiation ordinance be prepared. He also suggested that the un -named street to the new YMCA site be included as part of this contract since the building will be completed around the first of 1%7. After some discussion, Councilman Donnelly moved to authorize the Engineer to prepare plans and specifications for improvement of Daniel Street and the un -named street to the YMCA site and the City Attorney to prepare an initiation ordinance ordering the improvement. Councilman Hullum seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Councilmen Massey, Hullum. Fanestiel and Donnelly. Mayor Pro Tem Braswell Nays: None Laverne Fuller - Feeder Streets Wynnewood Addition to South Main Laverne Fuller and G. K. Hathaway.,local businessmen, appeared before,,the Council to offer some modification to the proposal to close Parkway Drive and.provide an outlet to Alexander Drive parallel.with the proposed Mopac spur approved at the, August 8th meeting. In his opinion, by closing Parkway Drive.and turnigg the traffic into Alexander Drive, would create as great a hazard as,would be eliminated by blocking off the railroad at Parkway Drive since Alexander Drive is,a major artery and carries a heavy flow of traffic. He proposed-buildings new street cross- ing connecting Sunset Drive with East.Nazro using property acquired by the railroad company in connection with securing the necessary right -of -way for the spur track. Mr. Fuller was asked to have a petition passed among the residents.of the area asking the MPRR to open Nazro Street through to Sunset Drive if Parkway Drive is closed. The petition can.then be presented to the City Council and they in turn, can discuss the proposal with officials of the Company at their next meeting. Messrs. Fuller and Hathaway were invited to attend the meeting also. They will be notified of the time and place. 4189 Unfinished Business The Council favored the proposal of Councilman Donnelly for the Mayor to re- activate the Capital Improvement Committee, with the possibility of additional members, to reevaluate the needs of Baytown, using the long range plan submitted by Bernard - Johnson Engineers and adding a few factors to include the new growth which is expected. Should the Committee start now in the development of a bond program, it would be possibly 18- months before a definite plan would be adopted for presentation to the voters of Baytown. City Manager Lanham suggested that the Council may want to update the present Comprehensive Plan since it was completed before the announcement of U. S. Steel locating within the area. This could be done either before or after the Committee is re- activated. The City Manager was instructed to investigate the possi- bility of getting funds to up -date the comprehensive plan prior to an extensive study by the aforementioned Committee. Councilman Donnelly asked that the CATV Franchise be place on the agenda for the August 25th regular meeting. Councilman Donnelly stressed the need of an early meeting with officials of MPRR, not only to discuss the right -of -way acquisition but, request them to bring a profile sketch of their proposed bridge crossing at Cedar Bayou. There is a possibility that the City may need to file a protest with the Corps of Engineers as to the height. He preferred discussing the problem with them to determine if there is a need to file a protest but any protest must be received by the District Engineer not later than August 25th. The City Manager was instructed to try to arrange a luncheon meeting on Tuesday or Wednesday, of the following week. Councilman Donnelly reported that on October 2 -7, the Baytown Chamber of Commerce is sending representatives on a tour with the East Texas Chamber of Commerce to the Sixth Industrial Tour which will visit Chicago. Pittsburg.,-.Cleveland and New York. U. S. Steel officials have indicated that, if any member of the City Council can make this tour. they would be pleased to have him visit their facitlites at Pittsburg. Plans are such that any.member of the City Coucil could remain in Pittsburg Wednesday. Thursday and possibly a part of Friday to talk with the U. S. Steel officials. The officials also indicated that they would like to take the Baytown group on a tour of the Gary, Indiana works. The Chamber of Commerce presently has three (3) additional reservations should any of the Council decide to take the tour. The cost per person is $480.00. CouncilmanlDonnelly suggested-that the City bear the expense of sending the City Manager as he was of.the opinion that this would be a very educational tour in view of the proposed U. S. Steel complex in Chambers County. The Council expressed some reluctance to authorize the expenditure - should any member of the Council prefer to go at :his expense this would be a worth while tour. After some discussion Council- man Fanestiel moved to encourage any Council member or City Official to make this tour at their own expense, if his schedule can be so arranged. Councilman Hullum seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Councilmen Massey, Hullum, and Fanestiel Mayor Pro Tem Braswell Nays: None Abstained: Councilman Donnelly Councilman Donnelly then moved to ask the City Manager to make the tour with the City bearing the initial cost of the expense, but no further action was taken on the motion as City Officials were included in the motion made by Mr. Fanestiel. Mayor Pro Tem Braswell mentioned the possibility of combining the tax appraisal procedure or t city an School,.and perhaps with the county, so that valuations may be more in line to ease the tax burden of the citizens of Baytown. Mr. Lanham reported that both the City and School Administrative Heads have been discussing a single appraisal from which each of the taking bodies could apply their own basis of assessment and the tax rate; Councilman Fanestiel suggested the three combining with the County serving as the collection agency. The project was assigned to the Council - School Board-Joint Committee for study, beginning with the thought�of a common appraisal. From this, the assessment and collection phase of the program may be projected if, and when, the proper- time-comes. 4190 Committee Reports Councilman Fanestiel gave a Traffic Committee report which included its discussion of the Defensive Driving Course which is to be held Monday and Tuesday, August 29, & 30th. at the Baytown Chamber of Commerce enrollment fee. $3.00 per person. The original course will be given to instructors; later any interested party. The City Council has approved the purchase of an Instructor's Kit which will be used by the Instructors in training five hundred (500) citizens at a fee of $4.00 per person. The money received for the enrollment will be used in buying supplies to keep the kit up to date. The original plan was to reimburse the City for the $400 spent in the purchase of the ' Kit. but the Citizens Traffic Advisory Council has no operating funds and it is the. recommendation of.the Traffic Committee be permitted to establish their own operating fund, with the stipulation if the Advisory Council ever disbands, the money reverts back to the City treasury. The City Attorney saw no prohibitiow to this arrangement as it would have no legal status to begin with. since it is a voluntary grail. Council- man Fanestiel then moved that the Citizens Traffic Council, rather than reimbursing the City. the Advisory Council set up their own treasury.and establish an operating fund for the Traffic Council, which will be use in carrying on the activities of the Traffic Council which will be of interest to the community; said operating fund is not to exceed $400.00. In the event the group disbands, any funds left in the operating fund will revert back to-the City of Baytown. Councilman Hullum seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Councilmen Massey, Hullum, Fanestiel and Donnelly. Mayor Pro Tem Braswell Nays: None (B) The target date. set by the Traffic Committee, for putting the traffic signal light at Midway and Harold Lane in operation is September.lst. (C) Committee approved the expenditure.of funds, left in the budget for signaliza- tion, to install traffic light at Park and Garth Road extension; also, possibility . of using funds to purchase traffic light.for installation at the intersection of Park and Bayway - this decision to be finalized after a meeting with V. V. Ramsey, to solicit.his assistance in the cost of the equipment. (D) Will prepare plans for signalization at the intersection of State Highway 146 and Ward Road. These plans will be submitted to the State Highway Department for their approval. (E) Denied request of Tex Dittman to install parking signs in front of his . hotel on South Ashbel Street. since it is in the fire zone. (F) Rufus Honeycutt, Manager of Brunson Theatre, has requested that the.block on South Jones, from West Pearce to West Texas which has No PARKING, signs; modified to permit parking on Saturdays, Sunday and holidays to accomodate patrons of the theatre. He asked that the modification be made immediately, if possible. Since the NO PARKING signs were placed there to eliminate parking and driving hazards during banking flours, Councilman Fanestiel moved that the parking sign on Jones Street, between Pearce and Texas, be modified to read: NO PARKING, MONDAYS THROUGH FRIDAYS - 8 AM to 5 PM. Councilman Donnelly seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Councilmen Massey, Hullum, Fanestiel and Donnelly. Mayor Pro Tem Braswell Nays: None (G) Embark on educational program acquainting the public with the requirements for operating motor scooters over the streets of Baytown. (H) Will make further study on the proposal to designate Stewart Street one -way for one block, from North Main east to Houston•Street. Councilmen Fanestiel and Donnelly will act as a Committee to discuss the signalization at Garth Road and Decker Drive intersection. Councilman Donnelly proposed that the City black -top 100 -feet west on Lynchburg Road at its intersection with Market Street to prevent water standing at this intersection as well and eliminating the hazard presently caused by the shell being pushed on Market. Also. the Administration to contact the School officials and ask them to purchase drainage tile. which the City will install, to prevent the some occurance on Market Street at the school's parking lot west of Robert E. Lee. 4191 Citv Manner's Resort The City Manager passed out copies of a proposed ordinance requiring the fencing of swimming pools. A public hearing will be called for the next regular meeting of the Council, ample publicity will be given to inform interested parties prior to the hearing. In order for the City Attorney to have sufficient time to prepare legal documents should the Council decide to protest the height of bridge to be built over Cedar Bayou by Mopac, the City Manager stressed the need of definite Council action to guide the City Attorney in his preparation. Councilman Donnelly moved that the Council file a protest, in order to have an opportunity to be heard before the Corps of Engineers. Councilman Hullum seconded the motion. The vote Sllows: Ayes: Councilmen Massey, Hullum, Fanestiel and Donnelly. Mayor Pro Tem Braswell Nays: None A special meeting will be held on August 18th to consider the plans on the East District Sewage Treatment Plant. The City Manger was instructed to contact the Maintenance Foreman of the Baytown - LaPorte Tunnel and request a better schedule on minor repairs in order to eliminate the blockage of automobile traffic using the tunnel during peak periods of the day. The City Manager will notify the Mopac officials that the Council is not pre- pared to make a decision on the Parkway crossing at this time. The status report on the North Main right -of -way reveals 23 deeds signed, 2 persons willing to sign, 12 thinking it over and 14 condemnations; these on the bass of the low appraisal. 7 Upon recommendation by the City Manager, Councilman Donnelly moved to authorize the City Manager to advertise for a mud jack to be used in the public works depart- ment, funds having been provided in the 1965 -66 budget. Councilman Massey seconded the motion. The vote follows: Ayes: Councilmen Massey, Hullum, Fanestiel and Donnelly. Mayor Pro Tem Braswell Nays: None The proposed budget for 1966 -67 is presently being type d and it is hoped, will be ready for presentation to the Council the week of August 14th. Adiouroment Councilman Hullum moved for the meeting to ajourn. Councilman Fanestiel seconded the motion. The ayes were unanimous and the Mayor Pro Tem declared the meeting adjourned. Edna Olier, City Clerk GENERAL CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF HARRIS § I, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Baytown, Texas, do hereby make and execute this certificate for the benefit of the Attorney General of the State of Texas and all other persons interested in said City's $(84,000 City of Baytown, Texas, Waterworks and Sewer System Refunding Bonds, Series 1966, now in the process of issuance. I certify as follows, to -wit: (1) That the members of the City Council of said City are the following: Seaborn Cravey Mayor A. M. Braswell Councilman Patrick Ball Councilman —' C. M. Massey Councilman Albert Fanestiel Councilman Don M. Hullum Councilman Raymond Donnelly Councilman Edna Oliver City Clerk (2) That J. B. LeFevre is Director of Finance of said City, and Mickie Coe is Tax Assessor - Collector of said City, (3) That said City on the 24th day of January, 1948, adopted a Home -Rule Charter, and since that day has operated as a Home - Rule City under the laws of the State of Texas; and that said Charter has in no way been amended, altered, changed, or repealed since its adoption. (4) I further certify that none of the bonds being refunded by the bonds in the process of issuance have ever been purchased by or held in the sinking funds created for said bonds being refunded. WITNESS MY HAND AND THE OFFICIAL SEAL OF SAID DISTRICT this day of , 1966. City Clerk, City of Baytown, Texas ( SEAL) r� CERTIFICATE OF ASSESSED VALUATIONS THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF HARRIS § 1 I, the undersigned, Tax Assessor - Collector of the City of Y Baytown, Texas, do hereby certify that the following is a true and correct statement of the assessed valuations of taxable property within said City as shown by the duly approved assess- ment rolls for the year 1965, which are the last approved assessment rolls for said City on file in my office, to -wit: $133,988,590 WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this day of , 1966. 0, �. a OfL_� Tax Assessor- Collec rs City of Bay t own , T •� ( SEAL) 3 INDEBTEDNESS CERTIFICATE OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF HARRIS § W. I, the undersigned, Director of Finance of the City of Baytown, Texas, do hereby certify that the following is a true, correct, and complete statement of the outstanding indebtedness of said City payable from ad valorem taxes: Purpose Date Interest Maturities Amt.Outst. Sewer 10 -10 -27 5 -1/2% $ 2M 10 -10 -66/67 $ 4,000 (Goose Creek) W.W. 10 -10 -27 5 -1/2% 6M 10 -10 -1966 9,000 (Goose Creek) 3M 1967 St.Imp. 9 -1 -45 2 -1/2% 25M 3 -1 -1967 25,000 (Goose Creek) Refunding 4 -10 -35 5% 1.5M 4 -10 -67/73 10,500 (Pelly) W.W. Ref. 4 -10 -35 5% 2M 4 -10 -67/73 14,000 (Pe l ly ) City Hall 7 -1 -35 5% 1.5M 7 -1 -67/71 7,500 Ref. (Pe l ly ) St.Imp. 12 -1 -45 3 -3/4% 6m 4 -1 -67/68 26,000 (Pelly ) 7M 1969/70 Park Imp. 2 -1 -48 3 -1/2% 7M 2 -1 -67/68 30,000 8M 1969/70 W and S.Ref. 3 -1 -52 2 -3/4% 5M 3 -1 -1967 11,000 6m 1968 W and S.Ref. 5 -15 -57 4 =1/4% 15M 5 -15 -1967 140,000 4% 44M 1968/69 4 -1/4% 12M 1969 4% 25M 1970 Purpose Date Interest Maturities Amt.Outst. St. & Drain. 2 -15 -58 3 -1/4% $ 41M 2 -15 -67 76o,000 15M 1972/73 45M 1968 17M 1976 4oM 1969 19M 1978/79 82M 1970 22M 1982/83 *All of the bonds of this issue will be refunded by the bonds in the 127M 1971 * *$205,000 of the bonds of this issue maturing as follows: $15M -1973, $16M- 1974/75, 134M 1972 $22M- 1982/83, will be refunded by the bonds in the process of issuance. 141M 1973 150M 1974 St.Imp. 5 -1 -59 4 -1/2% 30M 5 -1 -67/70 550,000 4% 35M 1971/74 90M 1975 100M 1976 2 -1/2% 100M 1977 Library 3 -1 -61 3 -1/2% 100M 3 -1 -75/76 350,000 3 -3/8% 150M 1977 Assumed Water District Bonds Combination Tax & Revenue Bonds: Harris Co. 12 -1 -56 4 -3/4% 10M 12 -1 -66/70 $ 450,000 WC &ID #58 15M 1971/75 W & S & D 20M 1976/80 25M 1981/89 J Harris Co.* 8 -1 -59 5% 5M 12 -1 -80/89 250,000 WC &ID #58 25M 1990/97 W & S & D Harris Co. 4 -1 -61 5% 10M 4 -1 -80/84 300,000 WC &ID #58 15M 1985/89 W & S & D 20M 1990/94 25M 1995/97 Harris Co. ** 12 -1 -49 3 -3/4% 12M 3 -1 -1967 286,000 FWSD #8 13M 1968/69 W & S 14m 1970/71 15M 1972/73 16m 1974/75 17M 1976 18M 1977 19M 1978/79 20M 1980 21M 1981 22M 1982/83 *All of the bonds of this issue will be refunded by the bonds in the process of issuance. * *$205,000 of the bonds of this issue maturing as follows: $15M -1973, $16M- 1974/75, $17-19V6, $18M -1977, $19M- 1978/79 $20M -1980, $21M -1981, $22M- 1982/83, will be refunded by the bonds in the process of issuance. r Purpose Date Harris Co. * ** 6 -1 -52 FWSD #8 w & S Harris Co. 9 -1 -55 FWSD #8 W & S Harris Co. * * ** 3 -1 -61 FWSD #8 w &S Harris Co. 3 -1 -61 FWSD #8 w &S Gen. Oblig. 2 -15 -66 3 -1/4% $ 5M 3 -1 -71/74 3 -1/2% 5M 1975 6m 1976/81 7M 1982/83 25M 1984/85 3 -1/2% 5M 3 -1 -1967 4M 1968 3 -3/4% 6m 1969 4m 1970 6M 1971 5M 1972 1M 1973 7M 1975 6m 1979 8m. 198o/81 7M 1982 9M 1983 15M 1984 16M 1985 4.05% 20M 3 -1 -86 23M 1987 25M 1988 28m 1989 30M 1990 52M 1991 55M 1992 57M 1993 6om 1994 4.15% 22M 3 -1 -86 20M 1987/90 5% 40M 2 -15 -67 50M 1968/73 3.80% 50M 1974/77 LOOM 1978/81 3.90% 150M 1982/84 3.95% 150M 1985 200M 1986 $ 125,000 107,000 350,000 102,000 1,74o,000 ** *$105,000 of the bonds of this issue maturing as follows: $5M -1975, $6m- 1976/81, $7M- 1982/83, $25M - 1984/85, will be refunded by the bonds in the process of issuance. * ** *$224,000 of the bonds of this issue maturing as follows: $52M -1991, $55M -1992, $57M -1993, $60M -1994, will be refunded by the bonds in the process of issuance. Purpose Date Interest Maturities Amt,Outst. BONDS IN PROCESS OF ISSUANCE Waterworks 8 -1 -66 & Sewer System 4% 4M 8 -1 -1967 $ 781,000 15M 1973/74 j Re£. Bonds, 20M 1975 Ser. 1966 25M 1976/79 30M 1930 35M 1981/83 30M 1984/85 35M 1990 1ooM 1991/94 TOTAL $5,647,000 WITNESS MY HAND AND THE OFFICIAL SEAL OF SAID CITY, this day of �{� 1966. Director of inance,- City of Baytown, Texas (SEAL)