Loading...
CC Resolution No. 872 1579 RESOLUTION NO. 872 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS, SUPPORTING THE EFFORTS OF THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MUNICIPAL LAW OFFICES TO REVERSE THE TREND OF RISING COSTS OF MUNICIPAL BORROWING; TO PROVIDE FIVE HUNDRED AND NO/100 ($500.00) DOLLARS TO SUCH CAUSE; TO PARTICIPATE AS A PARTY IN SUCH ENDEAVOR IF NECESSARY. *�ra��r�r■it*»**a**�ra�rtx�r+�r*.*��r*�t■*�r**r+razor+�-�r��r*�tz�ra����rr�r*��t*x�r�r�t*��ta■***�-x-��r WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 834, passed the 24th day of March, 1983, the City Council of the City of Baytown supports the repeal of Title 26, Section 103(j) of the Internal Revenue Code requiring municipalities to issue fully registered securities; and WHEREAS, it is believed that municipal bond registration is the first step toward taxing interest of all municipal bonds and securities; and WHEREAS, imposing a tax on income received from municipal bonds is clearly unconstitutional; and WHEREAS, the Supreme Court of the United States has recently taken original jurisdiction of the State of South Carolina's complaint challenging the constitutionality of the state and municipal bond registration and "public approval" of "Industrial Development Bonds" requirements of the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982. WHEREAS, the National Institute of Municipal Law Officers (NIMLO) has filed an Amicres Curiae brief in support of the State of South Carolina's complaint; and WHEREAS, NIMLO has determined that this is "massive" litigation for which a separate fund should be set up to cover costs of legal fees, experts witnesses; and other expenses; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS: Section 1: That the City of Baytown supports NIMLO's efforts to reverse this trend which raises the costs of borrowing for municipalities. Section 2: That the City Manager and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute and attest the attached "agreement" with NIMLO. 1580 Section 3: That the Finance Director of the City of Baytown is hereby authorized to pay NIMLO the sum of FIVE HUNDRED AND NO/100 ($500.00) DOLLARS; to certify his estimate of the cost of this legislation to the City of Baytown; and to appear as a witness is behalf of the City of Baytown before the master appointed by the United States Supreme Court. Section 4: This resolution shall take effect immediately from and after its passage by the City Council of the City of Baytown. INTRODUCED, READ, and PASSED by the affirmative vote of the City Council of the City of Baytown, this the 12th day of April, 1984. 6 ALLEN CANNON, Mayor ATTE�SJT- EILEEN P. HALL, City APPROVED: RANDAL STRONG, Ci Attorney AGRF� 1581 Return to: Benjamin L. Brown, President National Institute of M-micipal Law Officers 1000 Connecticut Avenue, N. W. , Suite 800 Washington, D. C. 20036 Dear President Brown: The of hereby attaches its check in the amount of (State, City or County) $ (according to population formula shown on this agreement) payable to NDW Federal Bond Registration Litigation Trust Fund to be placed in the NDW Trust Fund for use for the expenses, legal fees, experts and others who are employed by the Trustees to support the liti- gation attacking the constitutionality of the orovisions of the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsi- bility Act of 1982 (TF"RA) requiring registration of said bonds and securities to qualify in- te-,st paid on said bonds and securities for exemption from the Federal ties to qualify interest pa . on said bonds and securities for exemption from the Federal income tax. Further the liti.- gation will attack the requuiresrent of said Act of "public approval" in a specified way of all "industrial development bonds" including airport and other public facility bonds caught up in the broad definition of such bonds as an unconstitutional Federal burden upon States and their municipalities, as Federal tax exemption depends upon said approval. In addition, the attaches a sc,orn affidavit of its chief financial (State, City or County officer certifying as to his estimate of the cost of this legislation to the (State, City or If considered necessary by counsel, the State, City or County agrees that this County) financial officer will care and act as a witness at any hearing held by the Master appointed by the U. S. Suprerre Court to find the facts as to the impact of TEFRA upon the undersigned m -acipality. If deemed helpful by counsel, the name of this municipality may be entered as an intervening party and the undersigned counsel's nave may be signed to pleadings, briefs and other papers in this litigation provided such are first cleared through the undersigned. Population of Participating Jurisdiction Suggested Trust Fund Payment 25,000 and Under $ 125 25,001 - 50,000 $ 250 50,001 - 200,000 $ 500 200,001 - 500,000 $1,250 500,001 - 1,000,000 $2,750 over 1,000,000 $5,000 Participating Jurisdiction _Name, Title and Signature of Authorized Officer Mailing Address and Telephone Nuanber of Authorized Officer