Ordinance No. 10,013ORDINANCE NO. 10,013
Published in the Baytown Sun
Thursday, March 3, 2005
® AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS,
PROVIDING FOR THE EXTENSION OF CERTAIN BOUNDARY LIMITS OF THE
CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS, AND THE ANNEXATION OF 12.1300 ACRES OF
LAND IN THE GEORGE C. DAVIS SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1472, HARRIS COUNTY,
TEXAS, LOCATED SOUTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF INTERSTATE
HIGHWAY 10 AND NORTH MAIN STREET; WHICH SAID TERRITORIES LIE
ADJACENT TO AND ADJOIN THE PRESENT BOUNDARY LIMITS FOR THE CITY
OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS.
WHEREAS, there being no request for an "on- site" hearing, two public hearings before the City
Council of the City of Baytown, Texas, where all interested persons were provided with an opportunity to be
heard on the proposed annexation of the property described in Section 1 of this ordinance, were held, during
the City Council meeting on the 27`h day of January, 2005, in the City Council Chamber of the City Hall of the
City of Baytown, Texas, which date is not more than forty (40) nor less than twenty (20) days prior to the
institution of annexation proceedings; and
WHEREAS, notices of such public hearings were published in a newspaper having general circulation
in the City of Baytown, Texas, and in the below described territories on the 13'b day of January, 2005, which
date is not more than twenty (20) nor less than ten (10) days prior to the date of such public hearings; and
WHEREAS, a notice of such public hearings was posted on the City of Baytown's website on the 13'h
day of January, 2005, which date is not more than twenty (20) nor less than ten (10) days prior to the date of
such public hearings and remained posted until the date of the hearings; and
WHEREAS, the total corporate area of the City of Baytown, Texas, on the 1 st day of January, 2005,
was 32.43 square miles; and
WHEREAS, the population of the City of Baytown, Teas, is approximately 66,430 inhabitants; and
i
WHEREAS, the below described territories lie within the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of
f Baytown, Texas; and
WHEREAS, the below described territories lie adjacent to and adjoin the City of Baytown, Texas;
NOW THEREFORE
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS:
Section 1: That the following described land and territories lying adjacent to and adjoining the
City of Baytown are hereby added and annexed to the City of Baytown, Texas, and shall hereinafter be
included within the boundary limits of the City of Baytown, Texas, and present boundary limits of such City, at
the various points contiguous to the areas hereinafter described, are altered and amended so as to include said
areas within the corporate limits of the City of Baytown, Texas, to -wit:
SEE EXHIBIT "A"
Section 2: The above described territories and the areas so annexed shall be a part of the City of
® Baytown, Texas, and the property so added hereby shall bear its pro rata of the taxes levied by the City of
Baytown, Texas, and the inhabitants thereof shall be entitled to all of the rights and privileges of all the citizens
® of the City of Baytown and shall be bound by the acts, ordinances, resolutions, and regulations of the City of
Baytown, Texas.
Section 3: In accordance with Texas Local Government Code Annotated § 43.056, as amended,
the service plan prepared by the City for providing municipal services to the annexed areas is attached as
Exhibit "B" and is hereby approved.
Section 4: This ordinance shall be published and passed in the manner provided in Article 1,
Section 9, of the Charter of the City of Baytown, Texas.
INTRODUCED, READ and PASSED on the FIRST READING this the 24`h day of February, 2005.
CALVIN MUNDINGER, Mayor
ATTEST:
/Y1& J
GARY W. SMITH, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ACIO RAMIREZ, SR., C i Attorney
INTRODUCED, READ and PASSED on the SECOND AND FINAL READING this the /a' day
of M LI-Y )2005.
' 1
CALVIN MUNDINGER, Mayor
ATTEST:
SMI'114, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ACIO RAMIREZ; SR.,6h Attorney
® R:Ueanene\My Docu men ts\Counci1\04- 05Tebruary 2ndl AnnexationReadingt2+ 1300AcresCommercialInvestment .doc
STATE OF TEXAS)
COUNTY OF HARRIS)
FIELD NOTES of a 12.1300 acre tract of land situated in the George C. Davis Survey,
Abstract 1472, Harris County, Texas, and being out of and a part of that certain 23.304
acre tract of land conveyed by Troy J. Casey, et ux, to Ten Main, LTD, by Deed dated
December 11, 1969 and recorded in County Clerk's File No. D030921 of the Deed
Records of Harris County, Texas and part of that certain 0.1962 of an acre Landscape
Easement Tract conveyed by HGC, Limited Partnership, to Char, Inc. by Deed dated
December 21, 2001 and recorded in County Clerk's File No. V511224 of the Official
Public Records of Real Property of Harris County, Texas. This 12.1300 acre tract of land
is more particularly described by the following metes and bounds, to -wit:
NOTE: BEARINGS ARE GRID BEARINGS AND ALL COORDINATES REFER TO
THE STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, SOUTH CENTRAL ZONE, NAD 83.
ALL DISTANCES ARE ACTUAL DISTANCES. SCALE FACTOR = 0.9998832.
REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE PLAT OF EVEN DATE ACCOMPANYING THIS
METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION.
BEGINNING at a brass disc found in the West right-of- Nay line of Barkaloo Road (60
feet wide right -of -way; also known as Crosby -Cedar Bayou Road) at the Southeast corner
of said 23.304 acre tract and the Northeast corner of that certain 12.372 acre tract of land
conveyed by J. C. Noonan, Trustee, to George Gilman, Trustee, by Deed dated
November 10, 1978 and recorded in County Clerk's File No. F853137 of the Deed
Records of Harris County, Texas. Said point being the Southeast comer and POINT OF
BEGINNING of this tract and having a State Plane Coordinate Value of Y=
13,838,112.08 and X = 3,243,765.13.
THENCE: South 77'29'14" West along the South line of this tract, the South line of said
23.304 acres and the North line of said 12.372 acres for a distance of 928.09 feet to a' /z
inch iron rod, with cap, set in the East right-of-way line of North Main Street (100 feet
wide right -of -way) and the West line of said 23.304 acres for the Northwest comer of
said 12.372 acres, the southwest corner of said 23.304 acres and the Southwest corner of
this tract.
THENCE: North 12 °49'50" West along the Southernmost West line of this tract, the
West line of said 23.304 acres and the East right -of -way line of said North Main Street
for a distance of 400.00 feet to a'' /z inch iron rod, with cap, set for the Westernmost
Northwest corner of this tract and the Westernmost Southwest comer of the residue of
said 23.304 acres.
THENCE: North 77029'13" East along the Westernmost North line of this tract and the
Westernmost South line of said residue tract for a distance of 479.80 feet to a' /z inch iron
rod, with cap, set for an interior corner of this tract and the Southernmost Southeast
® corner of said residue tract.
iT A
® PAGE 2 — 12.1300 ACRES.
THENCE: North 12 °50'21" West along the middle West line of this tract and the
Southernmost East line of said residue tract for a distance of 195.03 feet to a point for an
interior comer of this tract and an exterior comer of said residue tract.
THENCE: South 77 °09'39" West along an interior line of this tract and an exterior line
of said residue tract and at a distance of 30.00 feet pass a point for the Southeast comer of
that said 0.1962 of an acre Landscape Easement Tract; in all, a total distance of 40.00 feet
to a point for an exterior corner of this tract.
THENCE: North 12050'21" West along the Northernmost West line of this tract and an
interior line of said Landscape Easement Tract and at 10.00 feet pass an interior South
line of said Landscape Easement Tract; in all, a total distance of 149.23 feet to a point for
the Northernmost Northwest corner of this tract.
THENCE: North 77 °29' 13" East along the Northernmost North line of this tract, over
and across said Landscape Easement Tract, for a distance of 10.00 feet to a point in the
Northernmost East line of said Landscape Easement Tract_ for an exterior Northeast
corner of this tract.
THENCE: South 12 °50'21" East along an exterior East line of this tract and the
Northernmost East line of said Landscape Easement Tract for a distance of 10.00 feet to a
point for an interior comer of this tract and an exterior corner of said residue tract.
THENCE: North 77'29'13" East along the Eastemmost North line of this tract and the
Easternmost South line of said residue tract for a distance of 483.07 feet to a' /z inch iron
rod, with cap, set in the West right -of -way of said Barkaloo Road (also known as Crosby -
Cedar Bayou Road) and the East line of said 23.304 acres for the Easternmost Northeast
corner of this tract and the Easternmost Southeast corner of said residue tract.
THENCE: South 12 °27'42" East along the East Iine of this tract, the East line of said
23.304 acres and the West right -of -way line of Barkaloo Road (also known as Crosby -
Cedar Bayou Road) for a distance of 734.03 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and
containing within these boundaries 12.1300 acres of land.
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
I, Juliene Ramsey, Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 4379, do hereby certify that the
hereinabove described tract of land was surveyed, under my supervision, on the ground, in
August of 2004 and that all lines, boundaries and landmarks are accurately described therein.
1 TESS my hand and sea] at Baytown, Texas, this the I" day of Decemb A. D., 2004.
O F T�
Ju ' ne Ramsey
Re istered Professional Land Sury nor No. 4379
04- 2607B.annexation.fdn.doc "JULJENE RAWS
. .�......... �
.
4379
9y�
Doi ��Q
0
W
J
Q
V
C4
z —�P p
H
W Z
0b
N O O
C G a
tu
W W
o
�n
W ^ j
a
0 2 N
N
W
m
J J
Ati
V '
s
L J
.W
SGT
wwi
J N
L!B O
�dY
g
"
� IY"
WyW�
o _1�
V ° N
LJ of
yw
W
■ to
J IL
O W
u La
a La
J 0-
to S
I
I
t
s
0
a a
o N •
as
O
ny c �c
t
S $
x� Yane CAD)
u� r
4 R BAYC R 0 _ w)
A
CSBY`CERD (60'
(CR ALCC
BARK S ,z•z
I
I
I
1
LI 1J-
vv _-
6
J
I
I
o�
yLa
a
05
do
�/ +POs ; �
fib• ��
r
1
rvN
II
" �
u bk
g
�hw
II
�yt
bbd i_og
•`� `�Si�k
0
o� °"
I
I
o�
yLa
a
Rf
— — ; cr.
do
�/ +POs ; �
fib• ��
r
1
p
II
" �
u bk
g
�hw
II
�yt
bbd i_og
•`� `�Si�k
YYW' yN.wr
NN�O•P)j II
o� °"
I T
1 b L J,
II
II
N jz•49:50.
bqw
C a °
w '
w
a
0
a.
o°
e
r
n �gg
d
°
60 �
>1 w
N€ 4R
i
sre� R
at�i. R
a 4
;t ! I
"
�ae—ae
nws
do
�/ +POs ; �
fib• ��
Y�
.
IL
o LU
z co
a
I N ST.
F NCRTH MAI
pp •r yyj
V_� =J
=y tlYj �3
V 400.00' Y��
R_C -W)
(1 00
It,
A
J
.... ...............................
.... ...............................
.... ...............................
SERVICE PLAN
for
12.1300 Acres
Apartment Complex
250 multi - family dwelling units to be located south of Interstate 10, east of N. Main Street
.... ...............................
.... ...............................
November 23, 2004
1:01,41,11P a.
SUMMARY
November 23, 2004
The area to be annexed is located in the ETJ, located on south of Interstate 10, east of
North Main Street.
Size of Area: The area proposed for annexation is 12.1300 acres shown on the attached
map.
Proposed Land Use: Multi- family Development. Upon annexation, the property will be in
the Mixed Use (MU) zoning district.
Impact: As a result of this proposed annexation:
The Fire Department will deliver the same services as other developments in the area.
The Response Time for receipt of call for services until the arrival of the 1St due
company 7 minutes 36 seconds. Fire will be confined to the room of origin increasing
the probability of accomplishing the critical task of rescue, fire control, and property
conservation. EMS survivability from cardiac arrest increase by 10% for each minute.
with BLS care before 6 minutes. The Response Time for receipt of call for services until
the arrival of the 1St alarm assignment (2 Engines, 1 Ladder, 1 Chief) on location, 14
minutes 36 seconds. The time over 10 minutes will significantly increase fire spread and
therefore decrease rescue, fire control, and property conservation measures.
Additionally, the return of circulation for cardiac arrest victims without ALS care within
10 minutes diminishes significantly. To improve the service delivery performance
measures to the proposed area the initial investment for construction of a new building,
equipment and personnel is $2,165,000 with a recurring cost of $1,039,900. (See
attached Service Plan). The project site will be assigned to Fire Station 1.
The Police Department indicates that the proposed annexation will increase area to be
patrolled, as well as increase amount of workload and an increase to crime rate is to be
anticipated. In addition, an increase in workload and response times to current
residents is to be anticipated. Preventative patrol time will decrease with additional
workload. The project site will be assigned to Police District 4. (See attached Service
Plan).
The Public Works and Utilities Department workload work and backlog will increase.
(See attached Service Plan).
The Health Department states that future annexation and development will increase the
r demand for services and decrease our ability to meet Advance Life Support (ALS)
response standards. To improve the service delivery performance measures to the
proposed area the initial investment for construction of a new building, equipment and
personnel is $1,375,000. (See attached memo)
• Means of Accomplishment: The annexation will be accomplished from the existing city
limit line.
Public Input: Public Hearings will be held to allow for public input.
Attachments: Attached to this summary are the specific Service Plan elements
submitted by each of the major city departments.
0
® SERVICE PLAN FOR THE FIRE DEPARTMENT
RE: Proposed annexation of 12.0958 acres (approximately 250 multi - family dwelling units
proposed) located on East side of North Main South of Interstate 10.
1. The area being annexed is described as: a Tracts 24A and 24B out of the George C.
Davis Survey, Abstract 1472 Harris County, Texas.
2. The area will be assigned to the following service area: District 1. The newly annexed
area will receive the same services as other developments in the area.
3. What are the expected service delivery performance measures for the area within
existing resources?
a. First Due: 7 minutes 36 seconds. (2.8 miles) Response Time for receipt of call
for services until the arrival of the 15` due company. Time less than six minutes is
required to confine the fire to the room of origin increasing the probability of
accomplishing the critical tasks of rescue, fire control, and property conservation.
EMS survivability from cardiac arrest increases by 10% for each minute with BLS
care before 6 minutes.
b. First Alarm: 14 minutes 36 seconds. (6.3 miles) Response Time for receipt of
call for services until the arrival of the first alarm assignment (2 Engines, 1
Ladder, 1 Chief) on location. The time over 10 minutes will significantly increase
fire spread and therefore decrease rescue, fire control, and property conservation
measures. Additionally, the return of circulation for cardiac arrest victims without
ALS care within 10 minutes diminishes significantly.
4. What expansion of resources would be required to improve the service delivery
Derformance measures to the Aror)osed area?
Initial Investment
Cost in dollars
Building —4 Bay Fire Station
1,700,000
Equipment — Fire Engine
450,000
Personnel Hiring Costs — 15 Personnel
15,000
Initial Costs Total
2,165,000
Recurring Costs
Cost in dollars
Personnel
1,020,000
Educational
1,500
Building Maintenance
4,000
Utilities
14,400
Recurring Costs Total
1,039,900
5. What would be the predicted service delivery performance measures with expanded
resources?
a. First Due: 6 minutes. Response Time for receipt of call for services until the
arrival of the 13' due company. Fire will be confined to the room of origin
increasing the probability of accomplishing the critical tasks of rescue, fire
control, and property conservation. EMS survivability from cardiac arrest will
increase by 10% for each minute of BLS care before 6 minutes.
b. First Alarm: 10 minutes. Response Time for receipt of call for services until the
arrival of the first alarm assignment (2 Engines, 1 Ladder, 1 Chief) on location.
The time under 10 minutes will significantly decrease fire spread and therefore
increase rescue, fire control, and property conservation measures. Additionally,
the return of circulation for cardiac arrest victims with ALS care within 10 minutes
increases significantly.
S on Blake, Fire Chief
0 Date
•
SERVICE PLAN FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT
RE: Proposed annexation of 12.0958 acres located south of Interstate 10, east of North Main Street.
1. The area being annexed is described as being a part of Tracts 24A and 24B out of the George Cl
Davis Survey, Abstract 1472, Harris County, Texas.
2. The area will be assigned to the following service area: foLiGL 0 /5-r The newly
annexed area will receive the same services as other developments in the area.
3. What will be the fiscal impact of this annexation on your department?
$ "D Construction of additional buildings. Please list in details any new building
requirements and attach hereto as Exhibit "A ".
➢ $ 'D The need to purchase additional vehicles. Please list in details any specific
vehicle requirements and attach hereto as Exhibit "B ".
➢ $ The Department need for additional personnel. Please list in details any specific
personnel required and attach hereto as Exhibit "C'.
➢ $ v If this annexation requires the construction and or expansion of any other
service facility or any capital equipment an explanation should be attached hereto as
Exhibit "D ".
4. How will this annexation eff
e ' ing response times ?
—IA115
0j U, .L/d 0/2-f15g
uh,P s
w
s
�►fo�ta� f
ffAW ,
M 2:
GrGffir d %•¢ i Tv
will this annexation effect
established (response ti
e) standards as established by
recognized agencies ?(explain)
f� i r
fir
r
e✓ t�0 /�2a•Cl.1�A� 5
5. The effective date of implementation of this service plan will be Upon Annexation.
Signatur
Date
9 SERVICE PLAN FOR THE PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
RE: Proposed annexation of 12.0958 acres located south of Interstate 10, east of North Main Street.
1. The area being annexed is described as being a part of Tracts 24A and 24B out of the George C.
Davis ry Abstract 1472, Harris n Texas.
2. The area will be assigned to the following service area: . The newly
annexed area will receive the same services as other developments in the area.
I What will be the fiscal impact of this annexation on your department?
4
➢ $ Construction of additional buildings. Please list in details any new building
requirements and attach hereto as Exhibit "A ".
➢ $ The need to purchase additional vehicles. Please list in details any specific
vehicle requirements and attach hereto as Exhibit "B ".
$ The Department need for additional personnel. Please list in details any specific
personnel required and attach hereto as Exhibit "C.
➢ $ If this annexation requires the construction and or expansion of any other
service facility or any capital equipment an explanation should be attached hereto as
Exhibit "D ".
How will this annexation effect existing response times?
and
will this annexation effect established (response time) standards as established by
recognized agencies ?(explain)
5. The effective date of implementation of this service plat
6� "s
�I
�W �-U-7
Date
® SERVICE PLAN FOR THE PUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT
RE: Proposed annexation of 12.0958 acres located south of Interstate 10, east of North Main Street.
1. The area being annexed is described as being a part of Tracts 24A and 24B out of the George C.
Davis Survey. Abstract 1472. Harris County, Texas,
2. The area will be assigned to the following service area: The newly
annexed area will receive the same services as other developments m the area.
3. What will be the fiscal impact of this annexation on your department?
➢ Construction of additional buildings. Please list in details any new building
req/u�irf ents and attach hereto as Exhibit "A ".
➢ $ /TThe need to purchase additional vehicles. Please list in details any specific
vehicle requirements and attach hereto as Exhibit "B ".
➢ ��The Department need for additional personnel. Please list in details any specific
personnel required and attach hereto as Exhibit "C'.
OrVs.2
➢ G f this annexation requires the construction and or expansion of any other
service facility or any capital equipment an explanation should be attached hereto as
Exhibit "D ".
4. How will this annexation effect existing response times ? /}GL f}w�►[x,��7o,�s /,.r tre,�r
reu&r,O,C -il mr .11 W r/c(oAdr &A tea,- kerAv .�r���o �o.y►c= deq Ncc
.� and
will this annexation effect established (response time) standards as established by
recognized agencies ?(explain)
5. The effective date of implementation of this service plan will be Upon Annexation. I ia�e
C ture
Z
Date ^
C.
SERVICE PLAN FOR THE BUILDINQ DEPARTMENT
RE: Proposed annexation of 12.0958 acres located south of Interstate 10, east of North Main Street.
The area being annexed is described as being a part of Tracts 24A and 24B out of the George C.
Davis Survey, Abstract 1472, Harris County, Texas.
2. The area will be assigned to the following service area: The newly
annexed area will receive the same services as other developments in the area.
3. What will be the fiscal impact of this annexation on your department?
➢ $-0- Construction of additional buildings. Please list in details any new building
requirements and attach hereto as Exhibit "A ".
➢ $-0- The need to purchase additional vehicles. Please list in details any specific
vehicle requirements and attach hereto as Exhibit "B ".
➢ S-zQ —The Department need for additional personnel. Please list in details any specific
personnel required and attach hereto as Exhibit "C'.
➢ $ - (D - If this annexation requires the construction and or expansion. of any other
service facility or any capital equipment an explanation should be attached hereto as
Exhibit "D ".
4. How will this annexation effect existing response times? Af /&
and
will this annexation effect established (response time) standards as established by
recognized agencies ?(explain) II A-
5. The effective date of implementation of this service plan will be Upon Annexation.
Signature
i //8 /off
Date
LJ
•
in MEMORANDU�m
CITY OF BAYTOWN
B`s
To: Planning and Community Development / Annexations
From: Mike Lester, Director of Health & EMS
Date: 11/10/04
Subject: 12.0958 acres, south of I -10 east of N. Main,
The continued incremental annexations of property combined with the increased demands for
service from citizens has caused a complete saturation of staffs capacity to provide service. To
continue to provide the same level of service to any additional annexations, without reducing
services to existing citizens, additional staff in EMS, Environmental Health and Neighborhood
Protection will be necessary. (See attached EMS response) The necessary staff for EH and NP
would be one Environmental Health Specialist and one Neighborhood Protection Officer
respectfully. The budgetary impact of each would be approximately $50,000 for a total of
$100,000.
As indicated in previous annexation comments the annexation of undeveloped property has little
impact on operational activities, however, as the properties are developed citizen demand for
service is immediate.
If there are any questions please advise.
•
CITY OF BAYTOWN
BAMWN MEMORANDUM
TO: Mike Lester, Director of Health and EMS
FROM: Jack Pitcock, EMS Division Man ge
DATE: November 11, 2004
SUBJ: Annexation Service Plan
This is our response to the proposed annexation of 12.0958 acres, south of Interstate 10, east of
North Main for use as a multi - family development.
The decision to add or modify Emergency Medical Service resources are based on two primary
criteria: Call Volume and Response Times.
Call Volume
The requests for service that we receive vary by time of day, day of week. Our goal is to
maintain enough ambulances so that we are able to respond to every request for service, allowing
for hourly call volume fluctuations. Historically, each City EMS unit can handle an average of
2,400 requests for service each year without significantly impacting our ability to respond to
each call. Our failure to maintain adequate resources results in calls which are passed to
commercial ambulance firms, which do not maintain the same standards of care which we offer
to the citizens. We have 3 EMS units staffed each day, which gives us a call load limit of about
7,200 requests for service. Our call volume this year will approach 7,000 and we are forecasting
an increase to just over 7,100 for next year.
New development impacts our call volume. As an example, a growth in population of 120
individuals adds 1 call per month to our call volume. In this specific annexation request, it's
estimated that there will be 240 apartments, approximately 500 people added to the population of
Baytown. This equates to an increase in call volume of about 50 calls per year. While this may
not be the `trigger' to require additional response resources, other cumulative incremental growth
in Baytown may push anticipated call volume beyond 7,200 requests annually. This will require
the consideration of additional staffed ambulances to meet call volume demands.
Response Times
There are several sources for response time standards for Emergency Medical Services. The two
most noted are the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard 1710, and the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung
Health Department
Emergency Medical Services Division
0
•
and Blood Institute "Staffing and Equipping Emergency Medical Services Systems ". They both
state that Advanced Life Support (ALS) response should be 9 minutes or less, 90% of the time.
Using current staffing and deployment plans, response time computer modeling and historical
data, the area considered for annexation will meet the minimum ALS response time standards.
Recommendation
Future annexation and development will not only increase the demand for services, but will also
decrease our ability to meet ALS response standards.
Estimated Costs
Buildings — Construction of a facility to house an ALS ambulance and crew 24 hours per
day in the northeast section of Baytown. Approximate Cost $750,000.
Vehicles — One Type 1, Class 1 A Modular Ambulance. Approximate Cost $130,000.
Additional Personnel — Four (4) Paramedics, Three (3) Senior Paramedics to staff the
ambulance. Approximate Cost $350,000.
Capital Equipment — Minimum essential equipment for the new ambulance, to 'include
12 -lead EKG Monitor, Stretcher, Carry-in Bags, Extrication Equipment, 2 -way radios for
ambulance, portable radios for crew. Approximate Cost $45,000
.Health Department
Emergency Medical Services Division
2
by /1 //2204 1b: 16b 2U142Ut8'31
pctition for Annotation
• pgge 1 of 2
L:! I Y UH BAY I UWN IIAUL U21 b'1
Acknowledgement
state of Texas
County of Harris/Chambers
Before me, the undersigned authority, on this day personally. appeared
James P. Hutchison - known to me to be the person whose name is
subscribed hereto, and who acknowledged that he executed the same for the purposes and
consideration therein expressed.
To certify which, witness my hand and official seal.
Notary Public, State of Texas
My commission expires: cc
E. DIANE FELAND
Natary Public, State of Texas
Commission Expires
06/14/2006
F:gws/en n cAa ti on/peti tion
Elizabeth Diane Feland
Notary's name printed
•
•
b
hti
y
�,A,d ,xsbw
5
Y
<g h
z
Z=
t
a
8! t
�q
}yyyOy�
J w
33
Y_$
SaW �
F»
Y� Y
3"
a
u<
Nil
i
�Yx
Y
d
g�Kr
z_, p
944
Z_
J
W Q.
U w
2 �
•
_j y a d
■
J W
o a a
W
Li j N c W
J a :3 a >
a to m Cl
y � T
5
SoF
°
a.
_ = a
p s
b °•s3
°
°5os
S_ a
a a-
-�� <o =� CAD)
qua R BAYOU p —W)
OSBY —CERD X60 R
(CP, Loo
BARKA S_12'2'
7
oQ
N
h
s _ 3
NYV
J Yti
wz
I
I
1
1
1
1 t
V 12t I
4 .Yj
i Y
v
C
Clq
.q
`i H NiAii� ST.
a
NCRT
a
a
r
G
E
S
m
s °
vg
=c �
t N
Ej �w
uNi C n Y
a
P �
ti
gr
AC\l
U
N
�
V
a
y
�
ro`
V
b
hti
y
�,A,d ,xsbw
5
Y
<g h
z
Z=
t
a
8! t
�q
}yyyOy�
J w
33
Y_$
SaW �
F»
Y� Y
3"
a
u<
Nil
i
�Yx
Y
d
g�Kr
z_, p
944
Z_
J
W Q.
U w
2 �
•
_j y a d
■
J W
o a a
W
Li j N c W
J a :3 a >
a to m Cl
y � T
5
SoF
°
a.
_ = a
p s
b °•s3
°
°5os
S_ a
a a-
-�� <o =� CAD)
qua R BAYOU p —W)
OSBY —CERD X60 R
(CP, Loo
BARKA S_12'2'
7
oQ
N
h
s _ 3
NYV
J Yti
wz
I
I
1
1
1
1 t
V 12t I
4 .Yj
i Y
v
C
Clq
.q
`i H NiAii� ST.
a
NCRT
a
a
r
G
E
S
m
s °
vg
=c �
t N
Ej �w
uNi C n Y
a
P �
5H u•`L °»
u
V aUO.ilil' i'zj7
' R C W)
(10 0
C.72
LU
5H u•`L °»
u
V aUO.ilil' i'zj7
' R C W)
(10 0