Ordinance No. 3,1071 0 3 1 2- 1 4
ORD I NAN C E NO _ 3 1 0 7
AN ORDI NANCE REP EA L I N G ORDINAN CE S NOS _ 3 0 5 0 AN I] 3 0 5 2
WHICH 13AD AWARDED HOUSING REHAB I L I T AT Z ON C ONTRACT S # 7 9-
03 -OS AND #79 -03 -14 TO ALFRED FORD CO�ISTRTJCTION COiIPAi�3Y
AND PROVIDING FOR THE E FF'E CT I VE D ATE HERE OF
WHERRAS the City of Baytown awarCled two C 2 > housing
ReYiabilitatiorx Corxtracts for repairs to Alfred Ford Construc-
t ion Comparsy and
WHE R EA S t h e t wo p r o j e c t s wa r e P r o j e c t # '7 9- O 3 - 1 4 5 1 3
Oak Street , as awarded by Ord inarnce No _ :3 passed ox3
D e c o mb e r 1 1 1 9 8 0 a rz d P r o j e c t # 7 9- O 3- O S, 1 1 2 5 B o 0 k e r t e e a s
awarded by Orciiriarrce iVo _ 3050 passed on December 11 1JSO ;
and
WHERE A S, n ume r o u x p r o b l e m s D a v e a r i s e rz o n
project awarded to Alfred Forcl Construction Company, being
Proj ect #"79 -04 -11 irrcl -Lx c3irng :
1_ F a i l u r e t o s up p l y m a t e r i a l s o f t h e cl zz a 1 i t y s p e c i-
f i e cl ;
2 _ L7rireasoriable delay in complet ing tYze work ;
3 _ Damage to tyro homeowraers property ;
4 _ Perforrrrirrg work irx a marxrzer which Forced tine
homeowner out of her home which is a breach of the
contract s terms arrd
WHEREAS the lzomaowriors at 513 Oak Street and 1125
Bookertaa have requested triat Alfred fiord Corstruction
Company riot do -the work on their homes because of its past
failure to adequately per sorrri tree worms a.ncl
WHE R E A S t h e Comm u n i t -Sr D ev e l o p m e n t A dv i s o r y C o mm i t t e e
rias reviewed the past record of Alfred Ford Construction
Company, grid has deterr�aixaecl that tree contract awards on
7 9- 0 3- 1 4 a n d # 7 9- 0 3- O S s h o u l d b e r e s c i n Cl e d; a n d
WEIEREAS , Alfred Ford Corrstructiori Company has requested
tliaIL; it be a L flowed to withdraw its bid on the two cCD zXX acts ,
NOW T R E RE FORE ,
10312 -14
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BAYTOWN:
Section 1: That based on the above findings, Alfred
Ford Construction Company was not the lowest and best res-
ponsible bidder on Housing Rehabilitation Projects #79- -03 -08
and #79- 03 -14.
Section 2: That Ordinance 3050, awarding Project
#79 -03 -08 to Alfred Ford Construction Company and Ordinance
No. 3052, awarding Project #79 -03 -14 to Alfred Ford Construct-
ion Company are hereby repealed and declared of to further
force and effect.
Section 3: That the Community Development Advisory
Committee is directed to rebid the above two projects.
Section 4: This ordinance shall take effect from and
after its passage.
INTRODUCED, READ, and PASSED by the affirmative vote of
the City Council on this the 12th day of March
441ETIT 0. HUTTO, Mayor
ATTEST:
EILEEN P. HALL, City Clerk
APPROVED:
A ALL B. STRONG, ZCity At ney
-2-
. 1981.