Ordinance No. 2,268I
7735
ORDINANCE NO. 2268
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN,
TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK OF THE CITY
OF BAYTOWN TO EXECUTE AND ATTEST TO A CONTRACT WITH
LANGFORD ENGINEERING, INC. FOR CONSULTING SERVICES FOR
A SMALL AREA TRANSIT STUDY AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE
DATE HEREOF.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BAYTOWN, TEXAS:
Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Baytown,
Texas, hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor and City
Clerk of the City of Baytown to execute and attest to a
contract with Langford Engineering, Inc. for consulting
services for a small area transit study. A copy of the
above referred to contract is attached hereto, marked Exhibit
"A," and made a part hereof for all intents and purposes.
Section 2: This ordinance shall take effect from and
after its passage by the City Council of the City of Baytown.
INTRODUCED, READ, and PASSED by the affirmative vote of
the City Council of the City of Baytown on this 14th day
of July , 1977.
TOM GENTRY, Mayor
ATTEST:
10
EILE N P. HALL, City Clerk
APPROVED:
NEE RI H DSON, City Attorney
'Illp
T T,-
7 7-T
fx! jj,f!
f ; f w) 'n T7
!
CI
z
I
w
MOM
W,M
7736
E X H I B IT "A"
9
STATE OF TEXAS X
COUNTY OF HARRIS X
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
THIS AGREEMENT entered into as of this
1977, by and between the City of Baytown
referred to as the CITY, and LA GF RD ENG
after referred to as the ENGINEER. The C
fore, as the parties to this agreement do
lows:
ARTICLE I SCOPE OF SERVICES
7737
day of ,
Texas, hereina ter
\EERING, INC., herein -
ITY and ENGINEER, there -
mutually agree as fol-
The ENGINEER agrees to undertake, perform and complete in an ex-
pedient and satisfactory and proper manner all of the professional
services described in the attached SCOPE OF WORK. Such SCOPE OF
WORK is labeled "Exhibit A" and is incorporated herein by,
r -e - rence. Reports shall be furnished by ENGINEER to the CITY in
accordance with the schedule set forth in ARTICLE V and all reports
rendered to the CITY shall become the property of the CITY.
ARTICLE II SCHEDULE FOR WORK
The work to be completed in accordance with the SCOPE OF WORK shall
be accomplished as a single phase of endeavor and the wor s all be
completed within four months following the authorization to com-
mence the work and delivery to the ENGINEER of a fully executed .
copy of this agreement.
ARTICLE III SUB - CONTRACTOR
Subject to this AGREEMENT the ENGINEER will sub - contract portions
of the work as described in the PROPOSAL to the Texas A F M Re-
search Foundation acting as contracting agency for the Texas
Transportation Institute, The Texas A & M University System. The
FOUNDATION agrees and will comply with all conditions of this
AGREEMENT and the SCOPE OF WORK. The AGREEMENT between the
FOUNDATION and the ENGINEER is included herewith as "Exhibit B".
ARTICLE IV MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY
ENGINEER represents that it has or will secure through the FOUNDA-
TION- (Sub - Contractor) the personnel with the professional compe-
tence and expertise required to perform the work called for in the
SCOPE OF WORK. The ENGINEER will assume responsibility for the
work to be performed and will provide all necessary supervision
and coordination of activities that may be required to complete
its requirements as provided for hereunder.
PAGE 1 of 7
7738
ARTICLE V STUDY COORDINATION AND REPORTS
1. COORDINATION. ENGINEER agrees that the work being completed
under this agreement shall be coordinated at regular and frequent
intervals with personnel designated by the CITY.
2. PRELIMINARY FINAL REPORT. Upon completion of the work defined
by the PROPOSAL, the ENGINEER will submit a preliminary draft
report to the CITY.
3. FINAL REPORT.
other appropriate
copies of a final
thirty (30) days.
4. CREDIT. Each
the following sta
After review and approval by the CITY, and any
agencies of the preliminary report, ten (10)
report.shall be submitted to the CITY within
report prepared by the ENGINEER shall include
tement on the title page:
"The preparation of this report has been financed
in part through a grant from the U. S. Department
of Transportation, Urban Mass Transportation Admin-
istration, under the Act of 1964, as amended."
S. OUTSIDE REPORTS. The reporting of work completed under this
Agreement to parties other than the CITY must have advance writ-
ten approval of the CITY.
ARTICLE VI COMPENSATION
The ENGINEER shall be reimbursed in accordance with Federal Pro-
curement Regulations Subpart 1 -15.3, the com ensation payable
hereunder shall be Twent - Thousand dollars (20,000.00) which
shall be.paid as provided iereina ter.
The budget which is attached in "Exhibit A" is an estimate of the
anticipated cost, as provided in Federal Procurement Regulations
Subpart 1 -15.3.
ARTICLE VII METHOD AND SCHEDULE OF PAYMENT
The ENGINEER shall submit monthly billings to the CITY and each
billing shall reflect expenditures on the project for the prior
month. Such invoices shall indicate the amounts expended by
major budget category. The CITY shall reimburse the ENGINEER
for such billings within thirty (30) days subsequent to receipt
of such billings.
Up to 900 of the compensation due as specified in ARTICLE VI
shall be invoiced and paid on a monthly basis, as described in
this Article. The remaining 10% shall-be paid upon completion
of the work described in this proposal, described in "Exhibit All
and the approval of said work by the CITY, with such approval and
payment not being unreasonably withheld.
PAGE 2 of 7
7739
The ENGINEER designates R. WAYNE SMITH, P. E. as project manager
and D. L. CHRISTIANSEN, P. E. as Principal Investigator for the
FOUNDATION who will devote their best efforts to insure that the
services to be provided hereunder are completed in a professional
manner acceptable to the CITY. It is anticipated that the indi-
viduals named in the SCOPE OF WORK included herewith as "Exhibit A"
shall contribute the 'indicated—e-TTort to this project; however,
the ENGINEER reserves the right to assign varying amounts of the
work to selected individuals of its choosing. This provision shall
not be used as a means of degrading the professional competence
devoted to the work provided for under this contract.
ARTICLE VIII TERMINATION
1. CONVENIENCE
It is agreed that the CITY may cancel or terminate this con-
tract at any time by written notice by certified mail to the
ENGINEER, with the understanding that, upon receipt of writ-
ten notice of termination, all work hereunder of the ENGINEER
and its employees shall cease. In the event of such termina-
tion prior to completion of the work provided for herein, the
CITY agrees to pay the ENGINEER for ~cork actually performed
and invoices in accordance with the terms of this contract,
less payment of any compensation previously paid.
2. CANCELLATION OF GRANT
Should this contract be terminated as a result of cancellation
of the UMTA Project Grant covering this project, then the CITY
will promptly notify the ENGINEER of the cancellation by certi-
fied mail; whereupon the ENGINEER will immediately, on receipt
of the latter, cease and desist from performing any other work
or services hereunder. In such event, ENGINEER will be paid
for professional services and other costs obligated prior to
said date upon furnishing CITY progress report and invoice to
such date.
ARTICLE IX VENUE
Venue and jurisdiction of any suit, right, or cause of action
arising under or in connection with the contract shall lie exclu-
sively in Harris County, Texas.
ARTICLE X TIME EXTENSIONS
The ENGINEER may request in writing an extension of the time of
completion beyond the time of performance specified in ARTICLE II,
and the CITY may extend the contract period if it so warrnts.
The CITY shall promptly process all such time extension requests
and advise the ENGINEER within fifteen (15) days of its decision.
PAGE 3 of 7
7740
ARTICLE XI CHANGES
.The CITY, from time to time, may require changes in scope of
the services and personnel of the ENGINEER to be performed
hereunder, provided the ENGINEER agrees in writing. Changes in-
cluding any increase or decrease in the amount of the ENGINEER'S
compensation, which are mutually agreed upon by and between the
CITY and the ENGINEER shall be incorporated in written amendments
to the AGREEMENT.
ARTICLE XII AUDIT AND INSPECTION OF RECORDS
The ENGINEER shall permit the authorized representatives of the
CITY, the U. S. Department of Transporation and the Comptroller
General of the United States to inspect and audit all data and
records of the ENGINEER relating to its performance under this
contract.
ARTICLE XIII OWNERSHIP -OF MATERIALS
Copies of all maps, data, reports, research, graphic presentation
materials, etc. developed by the ENGINEER as a part of its work
under this contract shall become the property of the CITY upon
completion of this contract, or in the event of termination or
cancellation hereof at the time of payment under ARTICLE VI for
work performed. Copies of all -such. data and material shall be
furnished to the CITY on request.
ARTICLE XIV EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
During the performance of this AGREEMENT, the ENGINEER, for it-
self, its assignees and successors in interest agree as follows:
1. COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATIONS
The ENGINEER shall comply with the Regulations relative to non-
discrimination in federally- assisted programs of the Department
of Transportation (hereinafter, "DOT ") Title 40, Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 21, as they may be amended from time to time
(hereinafter referred to as the Regulations), which are herein
incorporated by reference and made a part of the AGREEMENT.
2. NONDISCRIMINATION
The ENGINEER, with regard to the work, performed by it under this
AGREEMENT, shall not discriminate on the ground of race, color,
sex or national origin in the selection and retention of subcon-
tractors, including procurements of materials and leases of equip-
ment. The ENGINEER shall not participate either directly or in-
directly in the discrimination prohibited by section 21.5 of the
Regulations, including employment practices when the AGREEMENT
covers a program set forth in Appendix B of the Regulations.
PAGE 4 of 7
7741
3. SOLICITATIONS FOR SUBCONTRACTS, INCLUDING PROCUREMENTS
OF MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT
In all solicitations either by competitive bidding or negotiation
made by the ENGINEER for work to be performed under a subcontract,
including procurements of materials or leases of equipment, each
potential subcontractor or supplier shall be notified by the
ENGINEER of the ENGINEER'S obligations under this AGREEMENT and
the Regulations relative to nondiscrimination on the grounds of
race, color, sex or national origin.
4. INFORMATION AND REPORTS
The ENGINEER shall provide all information and reports required
by the Regulations or directives pursuant thereto, and shall per-
mit access to its books, records, accounts, other sources of
information and its facilities as may be determined by the CITY
or the URBAN MASS TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATION (UMTA) to be
pertinent to ascertain compliance with such Regulations, orders,
and instructions. Where any information is required of the
ENGINEER is in the exclusive possession of another who fails or
refuses to furnish this information, the ENGINEER shall so certify
to the CITY, or the URBAN MASS TRANSPORATION ADMINISTRATION, as -t
appropriate, and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain
the information.
S. SANCTIONS FOR NONCOMPLIANCE
In the event of the ENGINEER noncompliance with the nondiscrimina-
tion provisions of the AGREEMENT, the CITY shall impose such con-
tract sanctions as it or the URBAN MASS TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRA-
TION may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited
to:
(a) Withholding of payments to the ENGINEER
under the AGREEMENT until the ENGINEER
complies, and /or
(b) Cancellation, termination or suspension
of this AGREEMENT, in whole or in part.
6. INCORPORATION OF PROVISIONS
The ENGINEER shall include the provisions of paragraph 1 through
6 in every subcontract, including procurements of materials and
leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Regulations, or direc-
tives issued pursuant thereto. The ENGINEER shall take such
action with respect to any subcontract or procurement as the CITY
or the URBAN MASS TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATION may direct as a
means of enforcing such provision including sanctions for noncom-
pliance: Provided, however, that in the event the ENGINEER be-
comes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a sub-
contractor or supplier as a result of such direction, the ENGINEER
may request the CITY to enter into such litigation to protect the
interests of the CITY, and, in addition, the ENGINEER may request
PAGE 5 of 7
7742
the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the
interests of the United States.
ARTICLE XV MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRA4
Consistent with Federal policy expressed in Executive Order
11625, the ENGINEER assures that minority business enterprises
have the maximum practical opportunity to participate in all
contracting activities pursuant to this project.' In.providing
this opportunity, the ENGINEER must use its best efforts.
ARTICLE XVI COPYRIGHT
No report, maps or other documents produced in whole or in part
under this AGREEMENT shall be the subject of an application for
copyright by or on behalf of the ENGINEER.
If any contract or subcontract involves the development of patents,
a Patent Rights Clause will be required for inclusion in the con-
tract and will be obtained from URBAN INLASS TRANSPORTATION ADMINIS-
TRATION.
ARTICLE XVII INTEREST OF MEMBERS OF CONGRESS
No member of or delegate to the
shall be admitted to any share
any benefit arising therefrom.
Congress of the United States
or part of this AGREEMENT or to
ARTICLE XVIII INTEREST OF PUBLIC OFFICIALS
No member, officer, or employee of the public body or of a local
public body during his tenure or for one year thereafter shall
have any interest, direct or indirect, in this AGREEMENT or the
proceeds thereof.
ARTICLE XIX CLEAN AIR ACT OF 1970
ENGINEER hereby agrees to comply with all orders, applicable
standards, or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act
of 1970.
PAGE 6 of 7
7743
IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT
in duplicate originals at Baytown, Harris County, Texas the day
and year hereinabove written.
ATTEST: LANGFORD ENGINEERING, INC.
V ang o Jr. P. E. {
President W1
ATTEST:
City o Baytown, Texas
IL: tjc
PAGE 7 of 7
7744
EXHIBIT "A"
Scope of Work
Task I - Gather and Verify Data
Data pertaining to traffic operations and transportation planning
collected by agencies such as the City of Baytown, the Houston -
Galveston Area Council, the Houston - Galveston Regional Transpor-
tation Study, the State Department of Highways and Public Trans-
portation, and the City of Houston will be collected. This infor-
mation will be reviewed by the project staff to determine its
application to the study.
Travel patterns in the two selected corridors will be identified.
Computer data tapes developed as part of the Houston- Galveston
Regional Transportation Study will be processed through the Texas
A $ M computer facilities to develop trip tables showing district
to district movements for the traffic operating in the two study
corridors. This will provide origin- destination data for daily
trips using the two corridors. Combining this with other data
collected as part of the Regional Transportation Study and traffic
counts obtained by the City of Baytown will provide trip purpose
and peak hour data. An employees' zip code survey performed by
the Houston - Galveston Area Council will also be useful in deter-
mining travel patterns.
Task I will be an accurate description of existing and forecasted
travel patterns in the two study corridors.
Task II - Develop Transit Generation Methodology
Transit generation techniques will be formulated that can be
used in estimating potential ridership for various transit alter-
natives.
TTI has compiled considerable transit data, especially relating
to transit operations in Texas. Available Texas and U.S. data
will be used to develop techniques for estimating transit ridership.
Other data from Texas transit systems pertaining to trip purpose
served, ridership generated per vehicle -mile, socio- economic
characteristics of transit ridership, etc., will provide a basis
for additional estimates of transit ridership. The result of
Task R will be the development of transit generation methodol-
ogies which, given the base data developed in Tasks I and III, can
be used to estimate potential transit ridership for various transit
alternatives. The alternatives to be considered are enumerated in
Task IV of this proposal.
PAGE 1 of 4
7745
Task III - Identify Traffic Generation of Major Activity Centers
Three independent approaches will be used to estimate the work
trip generation of major activity centers. The first involves
analysis of existing data in the study area. Specifically, the
analyses performed in Task I will have provided existing and fore-
casted origin- destination data. The zip code survey performed by
H -GAC will assist in estimating the generation potential of the
Houston central business district.
A second approach will involve interviewing certain major employers
in the Houston Ship Channel area. It is proposed that between
10 and 15 major employers be interviewed. Information concerning
the magnitude of employment as well as estimates of the employees'
residential trip end will be obtained from these interviews. The
interviews will serve another valuable purpose. The attitudes
of major employers concerning transit will be identified. This
knowledge will be crucial in evaluating certain transit alterna-
tives, such as van pooling or subscription bus service.
A third approach to estimating work trip attractions will involve
the application of trip generation rates. Through the years cer-
tain generation rates have been established that define the general
magnitude of trip generation that is associated with certain land
uses. These rates will be used to assure that the rates obtained
using the first two approaches result in reasonable estimates.
The end result of Task III will be an estimate of the work trip
attractions of major activity centers influencing travel patterns
in the two study corridors. Knowledge of the employers' attitudes
concerning provision of transit will also have be obtained.
Task IV - Identify Transit Opportunities
The following three major alternatives will be evaluated.
1. Lease buses from the City of Houston to provide peak period
service in the two study corridors. Such an arrangement
could be similar to the City of Garland leasing transit
service from the City of Dallas.
2. Operate peak period service in the two study corridors as
a part of an overall city transit operation. Under this
alternative, the City of Baytown Mould become involved
in transit operations.
3. Provide information to major employers and other concerned
parties that could be used by those parties in establishing
van pools or subscription bus services. Other than pro -
vision of information, no direct city involvement would be
required.
PAGE 2 of 4
7746
It is anticipated that the results of this study will permit the
City of Baytown to determine which of the above listed alternatives,
if any, it chooses to pursue in providing transit service in the
two study corridors.
Several sub - alternatives can be
alternatives previously listed.
could be developed, van pooling
be encouraged, or connections w
routes could be provided. Each
evaluated in Task V.
associated with each of the broad
For example, park- and -ride lots
or subscription bus service could
ith proposed and existing HouTran
of these possibilities will be
Task V - Determine Transit Feasibility
The information assembled in Tasks I through III will be used to
evaluate the alternatives described in Task IV.
Alternative 1 would primarily relate to park- and -ride service.
Estimates of cost, revenues, and ridership for such a service will
be formulated. Also, the effect the ridership levels may have on
existing corridor congestion will be identified.
Alternative 2 would involve the City of Baytown operating a transit
system. The services such a system could provide during peak
periods in the two study.corridors will be evaluated. Such service
Mould include park- and -ride service as well as possible express
linkages to existing HouTran routes. Estimates of cost, revenue,
and ridership will be formulated. Also, a general estimate of
the total magnitude of cost and revenue that might be incurred in
operating a transit system (at an assumed level -of- service and fare)
will be presented.
It is possible that the evaluations performed will identify travel
patterns that are susceptible to being
CP
served by either subscrip-
tion bus service or van pooling. If such is the case, it is pos-
sible that, by providing this information to major employers and
other concerned parties, such a service will develop without any
expenditure of public funds. Estimates of ridership and costs
for these types of services will be formulated.
Task VI - Advise in Evaluation
Tasks I through V will have identified alternative courses of action
and defined the consequences of those actions. This will provide
the information required for the appropriate decision - makers to
determine which approach, if any, should be pursued by the City of
Baytown in implementing transit service in the two study corridors.
The findings of the study will be documented in a report and sub-
mitted to the City of Baytown.
PAGE 3 of 4
BUDGET
7747
The following is a budget projection by task.
Man hours of each
task are shown as a percentage of estimated
total
project time.
The estimated percentages of time per
task for
prime consultant
and sub - contractor is also shown. The
ratios
of man hours allo-
cated to prime consultant and sub - contractor
are
flexible and may
be revised, if necessary during the course
of
the project.
TASK OF
a OF
% OF
TASK
TASK
TOTAL
L.E.I.
TTI EXPENSES
I- Gather and Verify Data 16.25
38.5
61.5 $3250.00
II- Develop Transit Generation
Methodology 13.75
9.1
90.9 2750.00
III - Identify Traffic Generation
A.
of Major Activity Centers 16.25
46.2
53.8 3250.00
IV- Identify Transit Oppor-
tunities 15.00
2S.0
7S.0 3000.00
V- Determine Transit
Feasibility 32.50
26.1
73.9 6500.00
VI- Advise in Evaluation 6.2S
60.0
40.0 1250.00
TOTAL 100
$20,000.00
PAGE 4 of 4
7748
.c
•� EXHIBIT "B"
SUBCONTRACT
This Subcontract is entered into by and between
the Langford Engineering, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under
the laws of the State of Texas, hereinafter called SPONSOR, and TEXAS A & M
RESEARCH FOUNDATION, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of
the State of Texas, hereinafter called SUBCONTRACTOR.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, SPONSOR desires to engage SUBCONTRACTOR to perform certain
services in support of SPONSOR'S prime contract with the City of Baytown,
and
WHEREAS, the SUBCONTRACTOR is specifically qualified and equipped to
perform work and /or services described in a manner contemplated herein,
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual
covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, the parties hereby-covenant
and agree as follows:
I.
The SUBCONTRACTOR agrees to use its best efforts to perform the work
set forth in the Work Statement which is appended hereto as Appendix "A" made
a part hereof. The Work Statement shall not be changed except by duly
executed amendment to this Subcontract.
II.
The period of performance for this Subcontract shall extend for approx-
imately four (4) months beginning on the effective date of the Subcontract
and terminating four (4) months thereafter unless extended by mutual agree-
ment of the parties in writing.
7749
As compensation for the performance of this Subcontract, the SPONSOR
agrees to pay the SUBCONTRACTOR'S actual cost, both direct and indirect,
not to exceed $13,803. Details of costs, by amount and category, may
vary from those shown in the proposed budget so long as total costs do
not exceed the $13,803. Invoices from the SUBCONTRACTOR shall be pre-
pared in triplicate and sent to SPONSOR no more than monthly for costs
incurred.
IV.
SUBCONTRACTOR agrees that its performance of work and services
required by this Subcontract shall conform to high professional standards.
All work under this Subcontract shall be performed under the general
guidance and direction of Sadler Bridges, with Dennis Christiansen serving
as Principal Investigator.
V.
During the performance of this Subcontract, the SUBCONTRACTOR agrees
to comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 dated September
24, 1965, as amended and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders
of the Secretary of Labor on Equal Employment Opportunity created thereby.
VI.
SUBCONTRACTOR agrees to indemnify and save SPONSOR harmless from all
legal liability for injury or damages arising out of, or in connection with,
the presence of the SUBCONTRACTOR'S employees or agents on SPONSOR'S premises
pursuant to this Subcontract, provided, however, that such damage and
liability shall not have been caused by or contributed -to by the negligence
of agents or employees of SPONSOR.
775D
VII.
Neither the name of the SUBCONTRACTOR, nor any part of the Texas A & M
University System nor their employees shall be used by, or under authority
of, the SPONSOR for advertising or sales promotion with respect to any
commercial product or service.
VIII.
Any invention conceived or made under this Subcontract by SUBCONTRACTOR
shall be the SPONSOR'S property subject to an irrevocable, royalty -free,
unrestricted worldwide license which is hereby granted SUBCONTRACTOR.
1X.
SUBCONTRACTOR shall have the right to publish any information, con-
clusions or developments resulting from its research under this Subcontract,
provided, however, that SPONSOR shall be provided with a copy of such
intended publication at least two months prior to the submission of such
information to the publisher. SPONSOR shall have the right within a reason-
able time after its receipt to suggest alterations or deletions. The
subject matter of any publications shall not contain proprietary information
about the process or methods of the SPONSOR and no rights therein shall accrue
to the SUBCONTRACTOR as a result of this research.
X.
This Subcontract constitutes the entire agreement between the parties
relative to the subject matter, and may be modified or amended only by
a written agreement signed by both parties. It shall be construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of Texas.
7751
XI.
During the performance of this Subcontract, the SUBCONTRACTOR, for itself,
its assigneees and successors in interest agree as follows;
1. Compliance with Regulations- The SUBCONTR %CTOR shall conply
with the Regulations relative to nondiscrimination in federally
assisted programs of the Department of Transportation (herein-
after, "DOT ") Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 21
as they may be amended from time to time (hereinafter referred
to as the Regulations), which are herein incorporated by
reference and made a part of the Subcontract,
2. Nondiscrimination - The SUBCONTRACTOR with regard to the
work performed by it under this Subcontract,.shall not
discriminate on the ground of race, color, sex or
national origin in the selection and retention of
subcontractors, including procurements of materials
and leases of equipment. The SUBCONTRACTOR shall not
participate either directly or indirectly in the dis-
crimination prohibited by section 21.5 of the Regula-
tions, including employment practices when the Sub-
contract covers a program set forth in Appendix B
of the Regulations.
3. Solicitations for Subcontract, Including Procurements
of materials and Equipment- In all solicitations either
by competitive bidding or negotiation made by the
SUBCONTRACTOR for work to be performed under a subcontract,
including procurements of materials or leases of
equipment, each potential subcontractor or supplier
shall be notified by the SUBCONTRACTOR of the SUBCONTRACTOR'S
obligations under this Subcontract and the Regula-
tions relative to nondiscrimination on the grounds
of race, color, sex or national origin.
4. Information and Reports- The SUBCONTRACTOR shall provide
all information and reports required by the Regualtions or
directives issued pursuant thereto, and shall permit
access to its books, records, accounts, other sources
of information, and its facilities as may be determined
by the CITY or the URBAN MASS TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRA-
TION (UMTA) to be pertinent to ascertain compliance
with such Regulations, orders, and instructions. Where
any information is required of the SUBCONTRACTOR is the
exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to
furnish this information, the SUBCONTRACTOR shall so certify to
:the CITY, or the�URBAN MASSS TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATION.
as appropriate, and shall set forth what efforts it has
made to obtain the information.
7752
5. Sanctions for Noncompliance-. In the event of-the SUBCONTRACTOR
noncompliance with the nondiscrimination provision of the
Subcontract, the CITY shall-impose such contract sanctions
as it or the URBAN MASS TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATION may
determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to:
(a) Withholding of payments to the SUBCONTRACTOR
under the Subcontract until the SUBCONTRACTOR
complies, and /or
(b) Cancellation, termination or suspension
of this Subcontract, in whole or in part.
6. Incorporation of Provisions- The SUBCONTRACTOR shall include
the provisions of paragraph 1 through 6 in every subcontract,
inlluding procurements of materials and leases of equipment,
unless exempt by the Regulations, or directives issued
pursuant thereto. The SUBCONTRACTOR shall take such action with
respect to any subcontract or procurement as the CITY or.the
URBAN MASS TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATION may direct as a
means of enforcing such provision including sanctions for
noncompliance: Provided however, that in the event the
SPONSOR becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litiga-
tion with a subcontractor or supplier as a result of such
direction, the SUBCONTRACTOR may request the CITY to enter into
such litigation to.protect the interests of the CITY, and,
in addition, the SUBCONTRACTOR may request the United States to
enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the
United States.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Subcontract on
the day and year last specified below.
THE LANGFORD ENGINEERING, INC.
By.
Title
(late
TEXAS A & M RESEARCH FOUNDATION
By
Title
Date
FA
7753
APPENDIX A
Work Statement
Texas Transportation Institute, as a subcontractor to Langford Engineer-
ing, Inc., proposes to perform the following work as a part of the Small Area
Transit Study to be conducted for Baytown, Texas. The tasks referred to in
this Work Statement relate to those set forth in the proposal submitted by
Langford Engineering, Inc., to the City of Baytown, Texas.
Task I - Gather and Verify Data-
Texas Transportation Institute will contact the State Department of
Highways and Public Transportation, the Houston - Galveston Regional Transpor-
tation Study office, and the Houston- Galveston Area Council to collect exist-
ing data that are relevant to the project. The Institute will collect and
process through the Texas A &M University computer facility the origin -
destination data that have been assembled as part of the regional transpor-
tation study.
TTI will determine the appropriate methods of analyzing these data and
will supervise the data reduction process.
Task II - Develop Transit Generation Methodology
Texas Transportation Institute will establish methodologies to be used
in estimating potential transit ridership. The Institute will supervise the
application of these methodologies to the study corridors.
Task III - Identify Traffic Generation of Major Activity Centers
Texas Transportation Institute will draft a format to be used in inter-
viewing major employers located along the ship'channel. - The Institute will
recommend approaches to be used in interpreting and presenting the results
of these interviews.
r - ,
7754
TTI will develop methodologies to be used in analyzing available data
to estimate the trip generation potential of major employers. The Institute
will supervise these analyses.
Texas Transportation Institute will identify appropriate trip generation
rates, as developed in the literature, to be used as a means of assuring the
accuracy of the generation rates obtained from analyzing both the available
data and the data collected through the interview process.
Task IV - Identify Transit Opportunities
The Institute will identify and describe alternative transit approaches
that appear to warrant evaluation. TTI will suggest approaches that can be
used in presenting these alternatives (development of figures, etc.) to the
appropriate agencies and organizations.
Task V - Determine Transit Feasibility
Texas Transportation Institute will determine all methodologies to be
used in evaluating the transit alternatives. TTI will supervise the conduct
of the analyses performed.
Task VI - Advise in Evaluation
TTI will assist Langford Engineering, Inc., in explaining the signifi-
cance of the study findings.
7755
CONTRACT PRICING PROPOSAL
(RESr.Al(C11 A O 1W 1' 1.1.0PM1,.' \ 1.)
Upice of MarTa;;en►rnI Cott Dtul);et
Apptuval No. 2g- R01tt•f
This form is for tic when li) subn►i.sitan n(eust at pricing 6t3 (sec F113 1- 3.807 -311 is requirrd and
(ii) %uhstitntion for the Uptian d Fw►n S9 is authurised by tare contracting ti. car.
PAGE 110.
1
NO. Of PAGES
3
e+AbtE Of OffEFOR
Texas A & M Research Foundation
SUPPLIES Ar+D /OR St1cVICES TO BE FURNISHED
Scope of Service I
"Small Area Transit Study"
RF -77 -536
SOIAL AMOUNT Of PROPOSAL GOVT SOLICITATION NO.
s 13,803
Ho'Af 01110E ADDRESS
Faculty Exchange Box H
College Station, Texas 77843
i tSIOHIS1 + 110,14;5) wHE3` W02c TO BE PF RMEO
"texas ��rWiversity, 'texas Transportation
DETAIL DESCRIPTION OF COST ELEMENTS See Attached
Detail
I. DIRECT MATERIAL (Itewhe ON r ;Nbibit .1)
EST COST (S)
_77777
TOTAL
EST COST'
REFER -
ENCE:
r. PURCHASED PARTS
b. SUBCONTRACTED ITEMS
e O:NER-.(1) RAW MATERIAL
(2) YOUR STANDARD COMMERCIAL ITEMS
(3) INTERDiVIS10NAl TRANSFERS (At other than Call)
— TOTAL VIRECT M37TRI-11-
�
50
2. MATERIALOVERn!AD• (Rate %XS br.r =)
-0-
3. DIRECT LABOR (Spedfy)
ESTIMATED
HOURS
RAT -c)
HOUR
EST
COST (S)
'7s', z•
701.41. 1) RI-XT LABOR
.1 C ..SY
T 4 QOSk':N
�. � ...
� fy.' -.�. <�RO
7,715
a. LAS08 OVERHEAD (Spe:i %r D►parlinenl or Coil (:nNrr)'
O.H. RAZE
X LASE =
EST COSt (S)
1. SPECIAL TEST1.vG (Gnludirg field pork as Gorrrnwitnt iitttallitioas)
EST COST (S)
TOT.-It. SYJ:Cl.11. TESTrYG
-0-
6. SPECIAt EOUIPMENT (1/ dirret tb.erge) (lfeiisite as 1-- Vh;ln1 .1)
-0-
7. TP,eVEt (1%Ji,ecr charge) (Girr dreads ou aleailied Schedule)
EST COST (S)
a. TRANSPORTATION
23
b. PER DIEM OR SU3StSTENCE
1 080
TOTAL. 7R 11.1:1.
1,303
d CONSULTANTS (l. :rnti /t- pnrPolr -/ te)
Est COSt I S)
Y
-- TOTA1. C+)V ►17.7• 1 V t
�0-
V. OTHfR DIRECT COSTS IIfe -i -e en liJnlit .�) _
955
_
.I,- — — 'lY11.1l. lulac'r cat4 :1�n ui'l :u1a :. -111
10,023
11 GLIERAL AND ADMINIMRATIVE EXPENSE (R.rle 49 '/. Of sort de+arnt %-1.
f2
3 8
I
1 T. ROtIlT1ES •
-0-
13 �ur.u.rsrru.rt4n cnlr'
13,803
I < II If c, PROW
'107,11 1 Lir1 1411) (to %1'1:n IT i _ in; rRtuir - --
; 13
0.1..bcr 19-1
Enteral 4rt..ts .W nnuHtstr.n
FI'R I- lt..rt•it.
♦ma. -1 r. t
BUDGET DETAIL
RF -77 -536
Proposed Budget Period: July 1, 1977 - October 31, 1977 (4 Months)
1. Direct Material
General and Office Supplies
2. Material Overhead
Est. Rate/
Hours Hour
3.
Direct Labor
Principal Investigator
D. L. Christiansen
522 $ 9.89
R. W. Holder
85 13.05
J. D. Benson
87 10.55
Secretary
87 3.45
Subtotal
Provision for 6% Salary Increase
@ September 1, 1977
Total Direct Labor Costs
4.
Labor Overhead
5.
Special Testing
6.
Special Equipment
7.
Travel
a. Transportation
6 Trips from College Station,
Texas to
Baytown, Texas
6 Trips x 232 Miles /Trip @
$.16 /Mile
Est.
Cost
$5,163
1,109
918
300
7,490
225
223
7756
$ 50
-0-
7,715
-0-
-0-
-0-
N
M
M
BUDGET DETAIL (Continued)
RF -77 -536
7. Travel (Continued)
b. Per Diem or Subsistence
6 Trips to Baytown x 3 Days /Trip x
1.5 Man Trips x $40 /Day Subsistence Costs
Total Travel
8. Consultants
9. Other Direct Costs
Employee Fringe Benefits
(OASI and Insurance)
Estimated @ 8% of Direct Labor Costs
Computer Costs (Amdahl 470V/6)
Communications Costs
Reproduction Costs
Total Other Direct Costs
10. Total Direct Cost and Overhead
11. General and Administrative Expense
@ 49% of Direct Labor Costs
12. Royalties
13. Total Estimated Cost
1,080
617
238
50
50
7757
$ 1,303
-0-
955
10,023
3,780
-0-
13 803
7758
This ptupusAI•is Submitted fur utr in t'Utlneelloll with and in rrsl+uttsr to (llrunlr RF11,
TAMRF -77 -536
•nd fAfl C s our hest estimates as of this dite, in xrordinra with tl,e Inatrurtinns to Offerors And the Vn.armtrs which folLss.
TYPED NAME AND TITLE
Jo Ann Treat
Associate Director and Comptroller
SIGs URE
�� 2 24= _
NAME Of FIRM
Texas A & M Research Foundation
DATE OF SUBMISSION '
I June 27, 1977
EXHIBIT A— SUPPOPTI11G SCHEDULE (SPeciJy. If more spate is needed. me reverse)
COST EL NO.
ITEM DESCRIPTION (Srr footrrole S)
EST COST (S)
1. HAS ANY EXECUTIVE AGENCY Of THE UNITED STATES GOVERNtieENT FERFORre.EO ANY REVIEW Of YOUR ACCOUNTS OR RECORDS IN CONNECTION WITH ANY OTHE2
GOVERNMENT PRIME CONTRACT OR SUECONIRACi WITHIN THE PAST TWELVE MONTHS?
p YES E) NO (If yrt. ide llif) Won..)
NAME ANO ADDRESS OF REVIEWING OFFICE AND INDIVIDUAL DREW Audit Agency
Room 1017A 1114 Commerce Street, Dallas, Texas 75202
TELEPHONE NUMBER /EXTENSION
AC 214/749 -2436
It. WILL YOU REOU12i THE USE OF ANY GOVERNMENT PROPERTY I.V THE P °_2FO, -m4NCE OF THIS PROPOSED CON' ?ACT?
nYES ® NO (ff yes. iderrlif► w+ rrrene ar sep.rnrlr page)
fit GO YOU REOUME GOVERNMENT CONTRACT FINANCING TO PERFORM THIS PROPOSED CONTRACT?
a YES E] NO (1/ yes. hirmlifr.): U ADVANCE PAYMENTS 0 PROGRESS PAYMENTS Oil 1:1 GUARANTEED LOANS
IV. DO YOU NOW HOLD ANY CONTRACT (Or. do yarn hate any indrpr,rdrwNy /inissfe,l (1K&D) projal.) FOR THE SAME OR SIMILAR WORK GLLED fOR BY TKIS
PROPOSEO CONTRACT?
El YES W NO (1f ►,v. idrnri�►.):
V. DOES THIS COST SUMMARY CONFORM WITH THE COST P2INCIPLES SET FORT,s IN AGENCY REGULATIONS?
YES [:] NO it/u.. rspl.rin ov rtIrrrr er Iep.,rare p.,gr)
See Rel erce /•r In srrsnr,4+ss .rnd 1`,,anares vi, 1 sv, \A1. ruts m ou ( IU — %s I
2
INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS
1. The purpma of this (urns is to provide a atans]Ard format by %hich
the uffrrur submits to the Govrrnusrnt a summary Of incurred and
estimated rusts (wed anachtd rnpporling iaafmrm.11ion) suitable fur de-
tailed review and analysis. Prior to the award of a contract resulting
from this proposal the oRrror shall, under the condieiosts stated in
FPR 1-1.1407 -3 be required to submit a Certificate u( Current Gast or
Pricing Dica (See FPH 1- S•14ts7 - ;(h) and 1- 3.807 -4).
2. in addition to the specific information required by this Wnn, the
offeror is expected, in good faith, to incorporate in and submit with
this form any additional data, supporting schedules, or substantiation
which are reasonably required for the conduct of an appropriate re-
view and analysis in the light of the speeilk facts of this prucurenscnt.
For crfectil�e negotiations, it is essential that there be a clear under.
standing of.
a. The existing, verifiahle data.
Is. The judgmental (sours applied in projecting from known data
to the estimate, and
e. The contingencies used by the offeror in his proposed price.
In slsort, the o6eror's estimating process itself nccds to be discluwd.
7759
3. When attachment of supporting cost or pricing data to chit form it
impracticable, the dace will he described (tisch uhrduli..rr appropriate J,
and made available is. the contracting ulliccr or his rep-cscntativc upon
request.
J. The formats for the Cost F.Icnsetsts" and the "Peopts" Gmtract
Estimate" arc not intended as rigid ectluircments. These may tic per.
sentrd in different forma[ with the prior approval of the Contracting
011icer if required far nuste'etfeative and CM47ient presentatiun. In all
other respects this form will be completed and subsuittcd without
change.
S. By submission of this proposal the offeror grants to the Contracting
Oriicer, or his authorised representative, the right to exinsior, for the
purpose of verifying the cost tar pricing data submitted. chute hesesks.
records, documents and Other supporting data which will peranit idt•-
quatc evaluation Of such cost tar pricing data. Aung with the eumpuu-
tions and projeetitans used therein. This right may be exercised in cun-
nection with any negotiations prior to contract awacJ.
FOOTNOTES
1 Enter in this column these necenary and reatnurhle costs u•bith he the
jadymrat of the offeror will property he incurred in the t//tieuc prrforru.ni: r
of the contract. 11 -bem any of rile costs is this eolnamn batr alreassr been
irtrurred /e g.. a a letter contract or change order), dr•cribt Mine on on
attaebrd rnpporling rehedulr. cacti /y all rare and grant %rrs LHerrrn your
plank. diont, or orgg.rnitatious under a eonuuoai control, uVeh are in-
cluded at other thou the lower of east to ebr original rrautfrrror or tadrrrra
m.srkrr price.
3 II'ben spdcr ill addition to slats avail able he F..vhibil A it rrpnirrd. at-
tacb separate page as arcessary and identify he this •'Rrfrrrncr' talraann
the allachanrnt in u•hicb the information snppo.tinr the sprcific cost element
may br fofurd. No standard format it prescribes/: houerr. be cost or prior-
Vag ddhr roast be accurate, aanplrre and store t. and the j+ed/Krnrml fa :lsa0
word in projeedug from $be data to lbe athemses +rust he stairs/ in su//cinsr
detail $o arable the Contrrcing U,�rjcer to ttalnase the proposal. For ♦s-
asaplr, pruside she bafit rased fur pricing materials such as by Inador yno•
rations, shop estimates. or inroad price: the reason for rut of aerbead rates
ethicb disposes signijicaully from eaprrieotrd rotes (redused roln or. a
planned maior ►t•arraurrratrrt. etc.): or ju.ti/ieution for an ianratt in
labor falser (atatidpated iragr ansl salary increase. ale.). Identify sun/ ec-
p/ain any conlingrrcies ra•bich art indicated ire the proposed print, tart/, as
anticipated costs of rejects and defecate work, or aatliripatrd technical
di/frcul its.
3 fndicrlr the rater arced and provide an appropriate tsplanatiin. Where
agrermtrtl has been reatbtd "'ilk Gorerarntnl reprnrntalitto on. the art of
forward rising rater: describe the nature of the agrreurrnt. Pror•ide the
melhad of coerpraJ.uien and applieaion of your orerheaal mpnnr. indud eig
cost breakdon•n and sbou•ing !rends and bodgrsary data as eercenary to
pror•idr a basis for eraluation of the reasonablener of proposed rasa.
4 if the total cost entered here is in evicer of S31110, provide on a separate
pagr the fWasting information on each « pdrale itt" of roy rlh or license
fee. name acrd address of li :error. date of latemse adrteraent: pasrnl nuw-
bers. parrot application serial unwhers, or oshr► bads on ta•hish the royalty
it payah {t: brief description. including any part or model nramtirrs of each
conaract item or io+nponent on which she to is payable: per :enr,agr or
dollar rate of royally per unit: unit price of Contract item: number of
units, and total dotter aurarnt of royaltirr. to addition. if sperili::dly re-
stunted by the toutracting oJ�cer. a copy of tlar Current li:rute agretmuvs
and ideattijiea6osu of appheablo, Bairns of tperift patruts shall be prodded.
S prorije a list of priodpal items$ sr•ithin each caltgorl i4sh Nmg lewrar
or anticipated sourre. quamsity, rani, price. competition obtained. and basis
of orimbli.bing source and redsonablenrss of cat.
I CONTINUATION OF EXHIEIT A— SUPP02TING SCHEME AND REPLIES TO OUESTIONS 11 AND V. I